Pearl River Basin Report FINAL 4.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pearl River Basin Report FINAL 4.Pdf 2009 PPeeaarrll RRiivveerr BBaassiinn Characterization Report Louisiana State Reservoir Priority and Development Program BASIN CHARACTERIZATION REPORT FOR THE PEARL RIVER BASIN The Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development (DOTD) is responsible for reviewing and prioritizing proposed reservoir projects for which State of Louisiana (State) funding is being sought, and then recommending projects to the State Legislature. To support reservoir project review, prioritization, and recommendation efforts, DOTD has prepared characterization reports of water resources conditions in each of the nine principal surface water Report Topics Page basins in the State. These characterization reports provide an overview of water uses, Basin Overview ...................................2 needs, and concerns, and can be used by applicants for State funding, and by State Land Use and Legal Entities ...................4 agencies as they evaluate the applications. The basin characterization reports also Physiographic and Climatic contain extensive references that interested parties can use to find more information Information ........................................5 from Federal, State, and local agencies or other sources. The reports represent a Water Use .........................................6 “snapshot” of conditions in early 2009 (or when the references cited in the reports Surface Water ....................................8 were published). Groundwater ....................................12 Flooding ..........................................14 Based on available data, this basin characterization report provides an overview of the Environmental and Cultural Issues .........15 water uses, needs, and key water resources concerns for the Pearl River Basin (PRB) Recreation, Navigation, and (Map 1). Additional technical information on important issues may be provided in Hydropower ................................................17 separate technical reports. Interbasin and Interstate Issues ............17 Summary of Water Resources Needs .....18 Abbreviations and References ..............20 Red Bayou River ARKANSAS Macon Ouachita River Legend *# Major Cities %&'# Interstate B ± Bayou a y D Arbonne o Major Streams u Lake D o r c River Basins h e a t ATCHAFALAYA- TECHE-VERMILION Shreveport *# ¨¦§20 CALCASIEU-MERMENTAU Lake r LAKE PONTCHARTRAIN- LAKE MAUREPAS Bistineau ve Ri f n eu o S o c MISSISSIPPI RIVER DELTA a Wallace B a bi n Lake M R e iv O e u u OUACHITA RIVER r a o y c r R h a e i e d ta B v i PEARL RIVER R R R i i v v s e e r r a s Saline n RED RIVER D e Lake ug T Clear de SABINE RIVER R mo Lake iv n r e a e r v i R TENSAS RIVER i p p i s s i s s i Toledo ¨¦§49 M 010 20 40 60 80 Bend Reservoir Miles Catahoula Lake MISSISSIPPI Red River TEXAS Cocodrie Lake Tangipahoa Tangipahoa C B o a Whiskey River c y Chitto o ou d Pearl r Creek i r e e v i River R e n i b a S P e a r Baton Rouge l *# 12 R A §¨¦ iv t e Calcasieu River c 55 r h ¨¦§ a Amite f a la River y a 10 R *# Lake § i Lake ¨¦ v Lake Pontchartrain Mermentau River e M r is Maurepas Charles sis sip pi Ri B ve a r yo Vermilion u *# New Te River ch Orleans Sabine Calcasieu Lake Grand Lake e Lake Lac Des Allemands White Lake Lake Salvador Gulf of Mexico Map 1. Major Surface Water Basins of Louisiana1 1 BASIN OVERVIEW The PRB is located in southeastern Lake Pontchartrain-Lake Maurepas and its tributaries. The southern PRB Louisiana and has an area of 2,400 Basin to the west, and the Gulf of is in the Coastal Zone, as delineated by square miles2 (Map 2). The PRB is Mexico to the south. The PRB consists the Louisiana Department of Natural bounded by the Mississippi-Louisiana of the Louisiana portion of the upland Resources (LDNR). State line to the north and east, the terraces and valleys of the Pearl River Tangipahoa P us he pa ± ta pa C 0 10 20 re ek Washington Scale in Miles B B og o ue Bogalusa g L u us e a C Cre h ek it to R iv er St. Tammany P ea rl R iv er Legend W e Scenic Rivers s t P Main Waterways e a r l Lakes, Reservoirs, Canals R i v and Other Water Features e r Cities Coastal Zone Pearl River Basin Parish Boundary Map 2. Parishes, Main Waterways, and City Boundaries3 2 Bogalusa is the largest city in the PRB. 80,000 Estimated total population in the PRB in 2005 was 69,834. Table 1 shows 70,000 the 2005 population distribution in the 60,000 PRB by parish. Most of Washington 50,000 Parish and small parts of St. Tammany 40,000 and Tangipahoa parishes are located 30,000 in the PRB. Figure 1 shows historical 20,000 basin population from 1960 to 2005. Population Basin Total 10,000 The population of the PRB grew steadily from 1970 through 2005. 0 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010 Principal economic activities in the Pearl River Basin Year PRB include the timber industry and x Figure 1. Historical PRB Population4 the manufacture of wood products. Pearl River Also, the lower Pearl River’s healthy marsh complex helps maintain a viable fisheries industry in Louisiana and Mississippi.5 The primary future economic growth areas of this basin are not clearly defined. Table 1. PRB Population by Parish in 20054 Parish Population St. Tammany* 26,063 Tangipahoa* 1,249 Washington* 42,523 TOTAL 69,834 *Parish is located in more than one basin; population estimated for the area within the PRB. PRB=Pearl River Basin 11 3 LAND USE AND LEGAL ENTITIES Map 3 shows 2003 land uses in the decrease slightly in the PRB, and that irreversible conversion of any Prime PRB. The principal land use is wetlands, a large increase in urban land uses is Farmland for reservoir construction with interspersed agricultural and expected.6 The PRB contains some and water storage. Table 2 lists legal forested land areas in the northwest and land considered Prime Farmland by the entities in the PRB that may affect central regions of the basin. Economic Federal Natural Resources Conservation or be affected by water resources modeling for the 1992 to 2020 period Service (NRCS).7 The NRCS must development. indicates that forested land uses may be contacted regarding proposed ! ! ± 0 10 20 ! Scale in Miles Legend ! Oil/Gas Fields Land Use Open Water Developed, Open Space Developed, Low Intensity Developed, Medium Intensity Developed, High Intensity Barren Forest Natural Vegetation ! Pasture or Crops Wetlands Map 3. PRB Land Uses in 20038 4 Table 2. PRB Water Resources Legal Entities Legal Entity Responsibilities Capital Region Planning Commission Planning and development in south central Louisiana Regional Planning Commission for Jefferson, Orleans, Plaquemines, St. Bernard Planning and development in southeast Louisiana and St. Tammany Parishes PRB=Pearl River Basin PHYSIOGRAPHIC AND CLIMATIC INFORMATION Map 4 shows general basin topography. southern PRB encompasses flat coastal point, 374 feet above mean sea level, The PRB is dominated by the Pine marshes subject to tidal flooding. The is located in Washington Parish, on the Hills physiographic division, which is lowest elevation within PRB, at the northern basin boundary. characterized by undulating hills covered southern end of the basin, is 2 feet by pine and hardwood forests. The below mean sea level. The highest [_ Basin High ± 0 10 20 Scale in Miles Legend Geologic Faults Elevation Relative to Mean Sea Level (Feet) Basin High : 374 Basin Low Basin Low : -2 [ Highest/Lowest Elevation Locations [_ Map 4. PRB Topography9 5 Soils in the Pine Hills physiographic at Bogalusa, which varies between Average high temperature at Bogalusa region are dominated by loamy, fluvial about 40 and 80 inches per year, with a in the warmest month, July, is 92oF; deposits.10 Average annual rainfall historical average of about 61 inches. average low temperature in the coldest in the PRB is 64 inches per year Average annual temperature generally month, January, is 38oF. 12 throughout the entire basin.11 Figure increases from north to south from 66 to 2 shows historical annual precipitation 68 degrees Fahrenheit (oF) in the PRB.11 100 Annual Total 90 Historical Average 80 70 60 50 40 30 Precipitation (inches) Precipitation 20 10 0 Figure 2. Historical Annual Precipitation at Bogalusa11 WATER USE Water use in the PRB in 2005 is nearly 10 mgd. Nearly all surface from 6.2 mgd in 1990 to 13.5 mgd summarized in Table 3 by sector, water water used in the basin, exclusively in 2005. Total industrial water use type, and parish. Table 3 is based on from Bogue Lusa Creek, was dedicated increased from 13.7 mgd in 1990 to 20.5 water withdrawal data, which may be to industrial purposes, mainly for mgd in 2005. greater than total water consumptive manufacturing paper products. Because Per capita water use in 2005 (based use. For example, water withdrawn groundwater use is not reported by on reported rural domestic and public for irrigation is not entirely consumed surface water basin, individual parish supply uses by parish and population) by crops, allowing a percentage of the groundwater use was estimated by for PRB parishes varied from 103 water to be returned to a waterway. multiplying total parish groundwater gallons per capita (person) per day Groundwater served as the major water use by the percentage of total parish (gpcd) in St. Tammany Parish to 301 source in the PRB in 2005. Industry and population within the PRB (Table 3); gpcd in Washington Parish.13 The large public supply used this supply nearly actual groundwater use by parish may differences between parishes suggest equally in 2005: the sectors used 14.9 differ from this estimation.
Recommended publications
  • Flooding Concerns on the Lower Pearl River Near Walkiah Bluff
    Flood Assessment and Management Flooding Concerns on the Lower Pearl River Near Walkiah Bluff Amanda L. Roberts, National Weather Service Walkiah Bluff is located in south Mississippi on the East Pearl River near Wilson Slough and the divergence of the Pearl River into the East and West Pearl Rivers. Approximately 175 residents own homes on or near the East Pearl River near Walkiah Bluff, MS. Flooding often occurs in the Walkiah Bluff area whenever flooding occurs upstream on the Pearl River, thus heightening concerns of local citizens. The Lower Mississippi River Forecast Center (LMRFC) has flood forecasting responsibility in this area, however, Walkiah Bluff is not currently an official forecast point. Historical data from the period of record was utilized to develop flood forecasting guidance tools for the Walkiah Bluff area. Flood events were analyzed to obtain a better understanding of how Walkiah Bluff reacts in relationship to upstream flooding on the Pearl River at Bogalusa, LA and the Bogue Chitto River at Bush, LA. As- sessments were also made regarding how the Pearl River at Pearl River, LA reacts in association with upstream flooding at Walkiah Bluff and Bush. The effects of the Bogue Chitto River on the crest at Walkiah Bluff, MS are complicated due to numerous sloughs and bayous that interconnect the two channels. It is difficult to accurately interpolate any affects from the Bogue Chitto by utilizing a crest to crest curve for Bogalusa to Walkiah Bluff. However, because the crest at Pearl River, LA is based upon water routed from both Bogalusa and Bush, the LMRFC forecast for Pearl River, LA can be utilized along with the crest to crest curve for Walkiah Bluff to Pearl River, LA to essentially back-forecast the crest at Walkiah Bluff.
    [Show full text]
  • COMMON BOTTLENOSE DOLPHIN (Tursiops Truncatus Truncatus) Mississippi Sound, Lake Borgne, Bay Boudreau Stock
    May 2015 COMMON BOTTLENOSE DOLPHIN (Tursiops truncatus truncatus) Mississippi Sound, Lake Borgne, Bay Boudreau Stock NOTE – NMFS is in the process of writing individual stock assessment reports for each of the 31 bay, sound and estuary stocks of common bottlenose dolphins in the Gulf of Mexico. Until this effort is completed and 31 individual reports are available, some of the basic information presented in this report will also be included in the report: “Northern Gulf of Mexico Bay, Sound and Estuary Stocks”. STOCK DEFINITION AND GEOGRAPHIC RANGE Common bottlenose dolphins are distributed throughout the bays, sounds and estuaries of the northern Gulf of Mexico (Mullin 1988). Long-term (year-round, multi-year) residency by at least some individuals has been reported from nearly every site where photographic identification (photo-ID) or tagging studies have been conducted in the Gulf of Mexico (e.g., Irvine and Wells 1972; Shane 1977; Gruber 1981; Irvine et al. 1981; Wells 1986; Wells et al. 1987; Scott et al. 1990; Shane 1990; Wells 1991; Bräger 1993; Bräger et al. 1994; Fertl 1994; Wells et al. 1996a,b; Wells et al. 1997; Weller 1998; Maze and Wrsig 1999; Lynn and Wrsig 2002; Wells 2003; Hubard et al. 2004; Irwin and Wrsig 2004; Shane 2004; Balmer et al. 2008; Urian et al. 2009; Bassos-Hull et al. 2013). In many cases, residents predominantly use the bay, sound or estuary waters, with limited movements through passes to the Gulf of Mexico (Shane 1977; Shane 1990; Gruber 1981; Irvine et al. 1981; Shane 1990; Maze and Würsig 1999; Lynn and Würsig 2002; Fazioli et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplemental Environmental Assessment #269-A: Mississippi River Gulf Outlet, South of Lake Borgne, Additional Disposal Areas
    PO-32 Ph2 request item #4f ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT LAKE BORGNE - MRGO SHORELINE PROTECTION PROJECT ST BERNARD PARISH, LOUISIANA EA #402 INTRODUCTION The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), New Orleans District (CEMVN) prepared Environmental Assessment #402 (EA #402) to evaluate the potential impacts associated with the proposed Lake Borgne – Mississippi River Gulf Outlet (MRGO) Shoreline Protection Project. EA #402 was prepared in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 and the Council on Environmental Quality’s Regulations (40 CFR 1500-1508), as reflected in the USACE Engineering Regulation, ER 200-2-2. PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE PROPOSED ACTION The purpose of the proposed action is to protect salt marsh from erosion, between Lake Borgne and the MRGO in the vicinity of Shell Beach and Hopedale. This project is a Coastal Wetland Planning, Protection and Restoration Act (CWPPRA) project and was selected for completion by the Louisiana Coastal Wetlands Conservation and Restoration Task Force. The action is needed because high-energy waves are eroding wetland habitat along the south shore of Lake Borgne and the north bank of the MRGO. Continued erosion along both shorelines could eventually result in the merging of Lake Borgne and the MRGO. AUTHORITY FOR THE PROPOSED ACTION The Coastal Wetlands Planning, Protection and Restoration Act (Public Law 101-646) authorized the proposed action and the local cost share is being provided from the State of Louisiana’s Wetlands Conservation Trust Fund (LA. R.S. 49:213 et seq). PRIOR REPORTS Environmental Impact Statement: Operation and Maintenance Work on Three Navigation Projects in the Lake Borgne Vicinity, Louisiana, May 21, 1976.
    [Show full text]
  • Golden Triangle Marsh Creation Council (LA RESTORE 002 000 Cat1)
    Gulf Coast Mississippi River Delta Watershed Ecosystem Restoration Golden Triangle Marsh Creation Council (LA_RESTORE_002_000_Cat1) Project Name: Golden Triangle Marsh Creation - Planning Cost: Category 1: $4,347,733 Responsible Council Member: State of Louisiana Project Details: This proposed project would complete planning to create approximately 600 acres of marsh within the Golden Triangle Marsh system. Because the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal/Lake Borgne Surge Barrier stretches across the Golden Triangle Marsh, these wetlands provide an important natural buffer in the multiple lines of defense protecting geographically vulnerable communities in New Orleans from storm surge. In addition, the Golden Triangle Marsh falls within - and would enhance if fully implemented - the Bayou Sauvage National Wildlife Refuge, which includes fresh and brackish marshes and coastal hardwood forest, and serves as valuable wildlife, fish, and shellfish habitat. Activities: Activities would include engineering and design of the Golden Triangle Marsh Creation project, leading to construction-ready plans and specifications and the development of an adaptive management plan to guide decision-making for future project maintenance activities. If the plans are implemented in the future, the project would be constructed by hydraulically dredging and pumping sediment from Lake Borgne to a 600-acre fill site located approximately 16 miles from the borrow site. The borrow area, which consists mostly of clays and silts, currently has a depth of -10 feet and would be dredged to a depth of -30 feet. Earthen containment dikes would be constructed to facilitate the construction of the marsh. The engineering and design and permitting is expected to take three years to complete.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendations for Freshwater Diversion to Louisiana Estuaries
    0 0 RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 0 FRESHWATER DIVERSION TO LOUISIANA ESTUARIES EAST OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER 0 0 DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES COASTAL MANAGBIIBNT SECTION 0 0 Cover: a A plume of turbid water emanates from Bayou Lamoque as freshwater is diverted from the Mississippi River into the Breton �ound estuary to control salinity levels �nd enhance oyster production (p. 2). _ 0 0 . , 0 n 0 0 0 � 0 0 This document was published at a cost of $3.17 per copy by the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, P.O. Box 44396, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, for the purpose of carrying out the requirements of the Louisiana Coastal Zone Management Program under the authority of Act 361 of 1979. This material was printed in accordance with 0 the standards for printing by state agencies established pursuant to R.S. 43:31 and was purchased in accordance with the provisions of Title 43 of the Louisiana Revised Statutes. This project was financed through a grant provided under the Coastal Management Act of l9n, amendeci, which is administered by the U.S. Office of Coastal Zone Management, asNational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 0 � 0 0 0 D RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FRESHWATER DIVERSION TO LOUISIANA EAST OF THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER 0 ESTUARIES ( D by J. L. van Beek 0 D. Roberts D. Davis D. Sabins S. M. Gagliano 0 · Coastal Environments, Inc. 0 Baton Rouge, LA 0 This study was funded by: 0 Office of Coastal Zone Management National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 0 Department of Commerce · o prepared for: Coastal Management Section a Louisiana Department of Natural Resources G Baton Rouge, Louisiana 0 JUNE 1982 0 0 0 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS 0 CHAPTER IV: SUPPLEMENTAL FRESHWATER REQUIREMENTS List of Phot()S iii ..
    [Show full text]
  • Louisiana's Waterways
    Section22 Lagniappe Louisiana’s The Gulf Intracoastal Waterways Waterway is part of the larger Intracoastal Waterway, which stretches some three As you read, look for: thousand miles along the • Louisiana’s major rivers and lakes, and U.S. Atlantic coast from • vocabulary terms navigable and bayou. Boston, Massachusetts, to Key West, Florida, and Louisiana’s waterways define its geography. Water is not only the dominant fea- along the Gulf of Mexico ture of Louisiana’s environment, but it has shaped the state’s physical landscape. coast from Apalachee Bay, in northwest Florida, to Brownsville, Texas, on the Rio Grande. Right: The Native Americans called the Ouachita River “the river of sparkling silver water.” Terrain: Physical features of an area of land 40 Chapter 2 Louisiana’s Geography: Rivers and Regions The largest body of water affecting Louisiana is the Gulf of Mexico. The Map 5 Mississippi River ends its long journey in the Gulf’s warm waters. The changing Mississippi River has formed the terrain of the state. Louisiana’s Louisiana has almost 5,000 miles of navigable rivers, bayous, creeks, and Rivers and Lakes canals. (Navigable means the water is deep enough for safe travel by boat.) One waterway is part of a protected water route from the Atlantic Ocean to the Map Skill: In what direction Gulf of Mexico. The Gulf Intracoastal Waterway extends more than 1,100 miles does the Calcasieu River from Florida’s Panhandle to Brownsville, Texas. This system of rivers, bays, and flow? manmade canals provides a safe channel for ships, fishing boats, and pleasure craft.
    [Show full text]
  • Levee-District-Map.Pdf
    Louisiana Levee Districts Claiborne Union Morehouse West Carroll East CMD Coastal Zone 13 Carroll Bossier Webster Coastal Area Boundary Lincoln 15 Teche-Vermilion Fresh Water District Caddo Ouachita LA Parishes Richland Madison Oklahoma Bienville Arkansas Levee Districts Jackson 4 Atchafalaya Basin Levee District 2 Mississippi Franklin Madison 15 Bossier Levee District 16 Red Caldwell 3 De Soto River Texas 13 Caddo Levee District Tensas Louisiana Winn 22 Chenier Plain Coastal Restoration and Protection Authority 3 Fifth Louisiana Levee District Catahoula 17 Gulf of Mexico 30 Grand Isle Independent Levee District La Salle 20 Iberia Parish Levee, Hurricane Protection, and Conservation District Sabine Natchitoches Grant Concordia 33 Lafitte Area Independent Levee District 19 6 Lafourche Basin Levee District 17 Natchitoches Levee and Drainage District 19 Nineteenth Louisiana Levee District Avoyelles Rapides 24 North Lafourche Conservation, Levee and Drainage District Vernon West 5 Pontchartrain Levee District 21 Feliciana 18 16 Red River Levee and Drainage District West East Washington Feliciana Feliciana St. 21 Red River, Atchafalaya, and Bayou Boeuf Levee District Helena Evangeline 25 South Lafourche Levee District Pointe St. Beauregard Allen Tangipahoa St. Coupee Tammany 34 St. Mary Levee District Landry East West Baton 35 St. Tammany Levee District Baton Rouge Livingston Rouge 12 2 Tensas Levee District 36 35 10 Terrebonne Levee and Conservation District Jefferson Acadia St. 4 Jefferson Calcasieu Davis Lafayette Martin SLFPA - East Iberville 5 St. John Ascension Orleans the 27 East Jefferson Levee District 22 St. Baptist 7 James 27 8 Lake Borgne Basin Levee District St. 20 Assumption 6 32 11 Bernard 7 Orleans Levee District Cameron St.
    [Show full text]
  • Info Sheet Flood Defense System 18Jan30.Pub
    THE FLOOD PROTECTION AUTHORITY COMPREHENSIVE REGIONAL FLOOD DEFENSE The Evolution of the Local-Federal Flood Protection Partnership Local governmental flood protection efforts began with the establishment of levee districts. The Orleans Levee District was established in 1890, Lake Borgne Basin Levee District in 1892 and Pontchartrain Levee District (PLD) in 1895. The East Jefferson Levee District was removed from the PLD and established in 1979. The Great Flood of 1927 resulted in the eventual collapse of all levees around the Mississippi River. Congress passed the Flood Control Act of 1928 authorizing the Mississippi River and Tributaries (MRT) project. The MRT project brought an un- precedented degree of protection against riverine flooding. The first federal hurricane protection project was authorized by Congress in July, 1946 (Lake Pontchar- train, LA), for the construction of levees along the Jefferson Parish lakefront and Jefferson Parish side of the 17th Street Canal. In September, 1965, Hurricane Betsy made landfall in Louisiana as a powerful Category 4 hurricane causing widespread destruction across the region. The Flood Control Act of 1965, enacted by Congress on October 27, 1965, authorized the Corps of Engineers to design and construct hurricane flood protection in the New Orleans region [Lake Pontchartrain and Vicinity, Louisiana Hurricane Protection Project (LP&VHPP)] through the construction of levees, floodwalls and flood control structures. A Federal-Local Partnership developed with the local levee districts serving as the non-federal sponsor and assuming the local cost share for design and construction as well as taking on the operation and maintenance responsibilities of project features upon completion. The project was severely hindered by technical issues, environmental concerns, legal challenges and local opposition to certain features, and experienced significant costs escalations due to modifications and inflation.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of Hydrologic Modifications on Salinity and Formation of Hypoxia In
    Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Effects of Hydrologic Modifications on Salinity and Formation of Hypoxia in the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet and Adjacent Waterways, Southeastern Louisiana, 2008 to 2012 Scientific Investigations Report 2014–5077 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Front cover: Top, Looking southward along the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet at the rock barrier. Middle, Looking westward along the Gulf Intracoastal Waterway towards the Inner Harbor Navigation Canal-Lake Borgne Surge Barrier. Bottom, Looking southward from Lake Pontchartrain to the Seabrook floodgate complex and Inner Harbor Navigation (Industrial) Canal. All photographs courtesy of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Effects of Hydrologic Modifications on Salinity and Formation of Hypoxia in the Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet and Adjacent Waterways, Southeastern Louisiana, 2008 to 2012 By Christopher M. Swarzenski and Scott V. Mize Prepared in cooperation with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Scientific Investigations Report 2014–5077 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2014 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Lake Borgne and MRGO Shoreline Protection (PO-32) De-Authorized
    Louisiana Coastal Wetlands Conservation and Restoration Task Force rev. March 2010 Cost figures as of: September 2021 Lake Borgne and MRGO Shoreline Protection (PO-32) De-authorized Project Status Approved Date: 2003 Project Area: 465 acres Approved Funds: $1.08 M Total Est. Cost: $1.08 M Net Benefit After 20 Years: 266 acres Status: De-authorized Project Type: Shoreline Protection PPL #: 12 Location The project is located along the Lake Borgne shoreline between Doulluts Canal and Jahnckes Ditch and along the north bank of the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet (MRGO) between Doulluts Canal and Lena Lagoon in St. Bernard Parish, Louisiana. This project will help protect the fragile landbridge separating the MRGO (left Problems side of picture) and Lake Borgne (upper right). Doulluts Canal is also visible in this photograph. Shoreline erosion rates in this area were estimated to be 9 feet per year along Lake Borgne and 24 feet per year along the MRGO. Progress to Date The Louisiana Coastal Wetlands Conservation and Restoration Strategy Restoration Task Force approved funding for engineering and design at their January 2003 meeting. Engineering and The objective of this project is to preserve the marsh Design were completed in March 2005. Following between Lake Borgne and the MRGO by preventing Hurricane Katrina MVN Operations Division received 3rd shoreline erosion. In order to accomplish this objective, an supplemental funds and constructed the Lake Bornge reach 18,500 linear foot rock dike will be constructed along the using the CWPPRA design. In January 2010, the Task Force Lake Borgne shoreline from Doulluts Canal to Jahnckes initiated procedures to deauthorize this project.
    [Show full text]
  • Shell Beach South Marsh Creation (PO-168)
    Louisiana Coastal Wetlands Conservation and Restoration Task Force June 2021 Cost figures as of: September 2021 Shell Beach South Marsh Creation (PO-168) Project Status Approved Date: 2015 Project Area: 634 acres Approved Funds: $3.17 M Total Est. Cost: $28.1 M Net Benefit After 20 Years: 344 acres Status: Deauthorized/Transferred Project Type: Marsh Creation PPL#: 24 Location Region 1, Pontchartrain Basin, South Lake Borgne Mapping Unit, St. Bernard Parish, north bank of the Mississippi River Gulf Outlet (MRGO) in the vicinity of Shell Beach. Problems The marsh boundary separating Lake Borgne and the MRGO has undergone both interior and shoreline wetland losses due to subsidence, impacts related to construction and use of the MRGO (i.e., deep draft vessel traffic), and wind-driven Subsidence and salt water intrusion has caused shoreline and wetland loss within waves. Although much of the project area is protected from the marsh boundary separating Lake Borgne and the MRGO. Dredged sediment from Lake Borgne will be pumped into open water areas which will create 346 edge erosion by shoreline protection measures, and since acres of marsh and nourish 288 acres of existing fragmented marsh. 2009, the MRGO has been deauthorized for deep draft navigation and maintenance, interior wetland loss due to Progress to Date subsidence continues to cause marsh fragmentation and pond enlargement. Wetland loss rates in the project area are This project was approved for Phase I Engineering and estimated to be -0.60 percent a year based on USGS analysis. Design in January 2015. In March 2021, the project was deauthorized/transferred because the benefit area overlapped Restoration Strategy with a much larger NRDA project.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Resources of St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana
    In cooperation with the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development Water Resources of St. Tammany Parish, Louisiana Introduction supplies accounted for 70 percent (16 Mgal/d) of the total water withdrawn (table 2). Withdrawals for domestic use were 28 percent (6 Mgal/d). Generally, water withdrawals in the St. Tammany Parish, located in southeastern Louisiana parish increased from 1960 to 1970, decreased from 1970 to (fig. 1), contains fresh groundwater and surface-water resources. 1985, and again increased from 1985 to 2005 (fig. 2). In 2005, about 22.8 million gallons per day (Mgal/d) were This fact sheet summarizes basic information on the withdrawn from water sources in St. Tammany Parish (fig. water resources of St. Tammany Parish, La. Information 2). Almost 100 percent (22.7 Mgal/d) was withdrawn from on groundwater and surface-water availability, quality, groundwater, and less than 1 percent (0.06 Mgal/d) was development, use, and trends is based on previously published withdrawn from surface water (table 1). Withdrawals for public reports listed in the references section. 90°15' 90°00' 89°45' 89°30' A R K A N S A S M L I WASHINGTON O S Bogue U S 30°45' PARISH I I S S S A I S A I X N P A Chitto P TE I Sun Enlarged Bogue River area Folsom PARISH G U L F O F MEM TANGIPAHOA E X I Falaya COC O Tchefuncte ST. TAMMANY PARISH River M River Talisheek I West Pearl SS 30°30' River Covington Abita Abita Springs I Hickory EXPLANATION Pearl SS A River Approximate altitude of the base of fresh groundwater, in feet below Madisonville National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 I Pearl River Mandeville River P 2,000 to 2,499 Bayou Lacombe P 2,500 to 2,999 A´ 3,000 to 3,499 Lacombe I 3,500 to 3,599 Slidell A A' Trace of hydrogeologic Lake Pontchartrain section (see fig.
    [Show full text]