DOCSLIB.ORG

Jeb Bush Ben Carson Chris Christie Ted Cruz Carly Fiorina Mike

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jeb Bush Ben Carson Chris Christie Ted Cruz Carly Fiorina Mike VI-E.PIC OFFICIAL REPUBLICAN PRIMARY BALLOT March 15, 2016 Fairfield County, Ohio Instructions to Voter • To vote: completely darken the oval ( ) to the left of your choice. • Note the permitted number of choices directly below the title of each candidate office. Do not mark the ballot for more choices than allowed. • If you mark the ballot for more choices than permitted, that contest or question will not be counted. • To vote for a write-in candidate: completely darken the oval ( ) to the left of the blank line and write in the candidate's name. Only votes cast for candidates who filed as write-in candidates can be counted. • Do not write in a candidate's name if that person's name already is printed on the ballot for that same contest. • If you make a mistake or want to change your vote: return your ballot to an election official and get a new ballot. You may ask for a new ballot up to two times. For Delegates-at-Large and For Chief Justice of the Supreme For County Commissioner Alternates-at-Large to the National Court (Full term commencing 1-2-2017) Convention (Full term commencing 1-1-2017) (Vote for not more than 1) (Vote for not more than 1) (Vote for not more than 1) Carly Fiorina Maureen O'Connor Dave Levacy Mike Huckabee For Justice of the Supreme Court For County Commissioner John R. Kasich (Full term commencing 1-1-2017) (Full term commencing 1-3-2017) Rand Paul (Vote for not more than 1) (Vote for not more than 1) Marco Rubio Colleen Mary O'Toole Steven A. Davis Rick Santorum Pat Fischer For Prosecuting Attorney Donald J. Trump (Vote for not more than 1) For Justice of the Supreme Court Jeb Bush (Full term commencing 1-2-2017) Kyle Witt Ben Carson (Vote for not more than 1) Gregg Marx Chris Christie Pat DeWine For Clerk of the Court of Ted Cruz For Judge of the Court of Appeals Common Pleas For District Delegates and District (5th District) (Vote for not more than 1) Alternates to the National (Full term commencing 2-9-2017) (Vote for not more than 1) Branden C. Meyer Convention (15th District) (Vote for not more than 1) David Gormley For Sheriff Carly Fiorina For Judge of the Court of Appeals (Vote for not more than 1) Mike Huckabee (5th District) Dave Phalen (Full term commencing 2-10-2017) John R. Kasich (Vote for not more than 1) For County Recorder Rand Paul Craig Baldwin (Vote for not more than 1) Marco Rubio Gene Wood For Member of State Central Rick Santorum Committee, Man (20th District) For County Treasurer Donald J. Trump (Vote for not more than 1) (Vote for not more than 1) Jeb Bush Chris Schweitzer James N. Bahnsen Ben Carson Patrick Hennessey For County Engineer Chris Christie (Vote for not more than 1) For Member of State Central Ted Cruz Committee, Woman (20th District) Jeremiah D. Upp (Vote for not more than 1) For U.S. Senator For Coroner (Vote for not more than 1) Diana L. Fleegle (Vote for not more than 1) Rob PortmanSAMPLEFor State Senator (20th District) Thomas R. Vajen Don Elijah Eckhart (Vote for not more than 1) For Member of County Central Troy Balderson For Representative to Congress Committee (Vote for not more than 1) (15th District) For State Representative (77th (Vote for not more than 1) District) Edwin W. Laramee Steve Stivers (Vote for not more than 1) Tim Schaffer Page 1 of 2 FRONT Card 394 RptPct 820-10 "VI-E.PIC" Default 3 Proposed Tax Levy (Additional) Violet Township Fairfield County, Ohio A majority affirmative vote is necessary for passage. An additional tax for the benefit of Violet Township, for the purpose of general construction, reconstruction, resurfacing and repair of streets, roads and bridges at a rate not exceeding one and one-half (1.5) mills for each one dollar of valuation, which amounts to fifteen cents ($0.15) for each one hundred dollars of valuation, for five (5) years, commencing in 2016, first due in calendar year 2017. For the Tax Levy Against the Tax Levy SAMPLE Members of the Board of Elections Fairfield County, Ohio March 15, 2016 Page 2 of 2 BACK Card 394 RptPct 820-10 "VI-E.PIC" Default .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Support the Pandemic Healthcare Access Act, H.R. 6338 and S. 3546
    April 2, 2020 Support the Pandemic Healthcare Access Act, H.R. 6338 and S. 3546 On behalf of FreedomWorks’ activist community, I urge you to contact your representative and senators and ask them to cosponsor the Pandemic Healthcare Access Act, H.R. 6338 and S. 3546, introduced in the House by Reps. Ted Budd (R-N.C.) and Chip Roy (R-Texas) and in the Senate by Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Texas). The Pandemic Healthcare Access Act is a simple, common-sense piece of legislation focused on giving all Americans, regardless of their insurance plan, access to a safe vehicle to save their own money tax-free for healthcare expenditures. Especially in a time of crisis such as this, it is crucial that we ensure Americans have easy access to healthcare, and expanding the use of health savings accounts (HSAs) is a straightforward method towards that end. HSAs are a special type of savings account backed by the federal government that allow qualified individuals to set aside money pre-tax to pay for qualified medical services. These types of accounts are an excellent way to grant individuals greater flexibility in managing their healthcare needs. Unfortunately, only individuals with High Deductible Health Plans are allowed to use HSAs under current law, severely limiting the availability of these accounts. Americans should have the freedom to choose how they manage their healthcare. Expanding HSAs is just one way to grant individuals more choice. Now more than ever, as Americans are dealing with the realities of the novel coronavirus, there is a desire for people to know that they have control and means by which to address healthcare needs that may arise.
    [Show full text]
  • The Second Tea Party-Freedomworks Survey Report
    FreedomWorks Supporters: 2012 Campaign Activity, 2016 Preferences, and the Future of the Republican Party Ronald B. Rapoport and Meredith G. Dost Department of Government College of William and Mary September 11, 2013 ©Ronald B. Rapoport Introduction Since our first survey of FreedomWorks subscribers in December 2011, a lot has happened: the 2012 Republican nomination contests, the 2012 presidential and Congressional elections, continuing debates over the budget, Obamacare, and immigration, and the creation of a Republican Party Growth and Opportunity Project (GOP). In all of these, the Tea Party has played an important role. Tea Party-backed candidates won Republican nominations in contested primaries in Arizona, Indiana, Texas and Missouri, and two of the four won elections. Even though Romney was not a Tea Party favorite (see the first report), the movement pushed him and other Republican Congressional/Senatorial candidates (e.g., Orin Hatch) to engage the Tea Party agenda even when they had not done so before. In this report, we will focus on the role of FreedomWorks subscribers in the 2012 nomination and general election campaigns. We’ll also discuss their role in—and view of—the Republican Party as we move forward to 2014 and 2016. This is the first of multiple reports on the March-June 2013 survey, which re-interviewed 2,613 FreedomWorks subscribers who also filled out the December 2011 survey. Key findings: Rallying around Romney (pp. 3-4) Between the 2011 and 2013 surveys, Romney’s evaluations went up significantly from 2:1 positive to 4:1 positive surveys. By the end of the nomination process Romney and Santorum had become the two top nomination choices but neither received over a quarter of the sample’s support.
    [Show full text]
  • Suffolk University/USA Today National July 2015
    Suffolk University/USA Today National July 2015 Region: (N=1,000) n % Northeast ---------------------------------------------------------- 207 20.70 South --------------------------------------------------------------- 354 35.40 Midwest ------------------------------------------------------------ 227 22.70 West ---------------------------------------------------------------- 212 21.20 Hello, my name is __________ and I am conducting a survey for Suffolk University/USA Today and I would like to get your opinions on some issues of the day. Would you like to spend seven minutes to help us out? {ASK FOR YOUNGEST IN HOUSEHOLD} 1. Gender (N=1,000) n % Male ---------------------------------------------------------------- 484 48.40 Female ------------------------------------------------------------- 516 51.60 2. How likely are you to vote in the election for President in 2016 --very likely, somewhat likely, 50- 50 or not likely? (N=1,000) n % Very likely --------------------------------------------------------- 928 92.80 Somewhat likely ------------------------------------------------- 48 4.80 50-50 ---------------------------------------------------------------- 24 2.40 3. Do you think of yourself as a Democrat, Republican, or Independent? {IF INDEPENDENT, “Which party would you lean toward/feel closest to”} (N=1,000) n % Democrat ---------------------------------------------------------- 369 36.90 Republican -------------------------------------------------------- 313 31.30 Independent ------------------------------------------------------ 279
    [Show full text]
  • Capitol Insurrection at Center of Conservative Movement
    Capitol Insurrection At Center Of Conservative Movement: At Least 43 Governors, Senators And Members Of Congress Have Ties To Groups That Planned January 6th Rally And Riots. SUMMARY: On January 6, 2021, a rally in support of overturning the results of the 2020 presidential election “turned deadly” when thousands of people stormed the U.S. Capitol at Donald Trump’s urging. Even Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell, who rarely broke with Trump, has explicitly said, “the mob was fed lies. They were provoked by the President and other powerful people.” These “other powerful people” include a vast array of conservative officials and Trump allies who perpetuated false claims of fraud in the 2020 election after enjoying critical support from the groups that fueled the Capitol riot. In fact, at least 43 current Governors or elected federal office holders have direct ties to the groups that helped plan the January 6th rally, along with at least 15 members of Donald Trump’s former administration. The links that these Trump-allied officials have to these groups are: Turning Point Action, an arm of right-wing Turning Point USA, claimed to send “80+ buses full of patriots” to the rally that led to the Capitol riot, claiming the event would be one of the most “consequential” in U.S. history. • The group spent over $1.5 million supporting Trump and his Georgia senate allies who claimed the election was fraudulent and supported efforts to overturn it. • The organization hosted Trump at an event where he claimed Democrats were trying to “rig the election,” which he said would be “the most corrupt election in the history of our country.” • At a Turning Point USA event, Rep.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tea Party Movement As a Modern Incarnation of Nativism in the United States and Its Role in American Electoral Politics, 2009-2014
    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works All Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects Dissertations, Theses, and Capstone Projects 10-2014 The Tea Party Movement as a Modern Incarnation of Nativism in the United States and Its Role in American Electoral Politics, 2009-2014 Albert Choi Graduate Center, City University of New York How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/gc_etds/343 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] The Tea Party Movement as a Modern Incarnation of Nativism in the United States and Its Role in American Electoral Politics, 2009-2014 by Albert Choi A master’s thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty in Political Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts, The City University of New York 2014 i Copyright © 2014 by Albert Choi All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other noncommercial uses permitted by copyright law. ii This manuscript has been read and accepted for the Graduate Faculty in Political Science in satisfaction of the dissertation requirement for the degree of Master of Arts. THE City University of New York iii Abstract The Tea Party Movement as a Modern Incarnation of Nativism in the United States and Its Role in American Electoral Politics, 2009-2014 by Albert Choi Advisor: Professor Frances Piven The Tea Party movement has been a keyword in American politics since its inception in 2009.
    [Show full text]
  • FEDEK'hlection COMMISSION 1 FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 2 999 E Street, N.W
    - '"Ti FEDEK'HLECTION COMMISSION 1 FEDERAL ELECTION COMMISSION 2 999 E Street, N.w. 20i5 SEP 22 AH 3- 08 3 Washington, D.C. 20463 4 5 FIRST GENERAL COUNSEL'S REPORT 6 7 MUR 6939 8 DATE OF COMPLAINT: May 19,2015 9 DATES OF NOTIFICATION: May 26, 2015 10 DATE OF LAST RESPONSE: June 17,2015 11 DATE ACTIVATED: June 24, 2015 12 13 ELECTION CYCLE: 2016 14 EXPIRATION OF SOL: May 5, 2020 15 16 COMPLAINANTS; Brad Woodhouse 17 American Democracy Legal Fund 18 19 RESPONDENTS: Mike Huckabee 20 Pursuing America's Greatness and 21 Bryan Jeffrey in his official 22 capacity as treasurer 23 24 RELEVANT STATUTES 52 U.S.C. §30116(a)' 25 AND REGULATIONS: 52 U.S.C. § 30125(e)(1)(A) 26 11 C.F.R. § 300.2(ra) 27 IIC.F.R. § 300.61 28 29 INTERNAL REPORTS CHECKED: Disclosure Reports 30 31 FEDERAL AGENCIES CHECKED: None 32 33 34 I. INTRODUCTION 35 This matter involves an allegation that former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee 36 solicited excessive contributions for an independent-expenditure-only committee when, during 37 the announcement of his candidacy for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination, he stated, 38 "[i]f you want to give a million dollars, please do it." Huckabee asserts that his statement was a 39 joke, not an actual solicitation of a million-dollar contribution. Although Huckabee's remarks On September 1, 2014, the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, as amended, was transferred from Title 2 to new Title 52 of the United States Code.
    [Show full text]
  • The Tea Party Movement and Entelechy: an Inductive Study of Tea Party Rhetoric By
    The Tea Party Movement and Entelechy: an Inductive Study of Tea Party Rhetoric By John Leyland Price M.A., Central Michigan University, 2013 B.S.B.A., Central Michigan University, 2010 Submitted to the graduate degree program in Communication Studies and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Chair: Dr. Robert C. Rowland Dr. Beth Innocenti Dr. Brett Bricker Dr. Scott Harris Dr. Wayne Sailor Date Defended: 5 September 2019 ii The dissertation committee for John Leyland Price certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: The Tea Party Movement and Entelechy: an Inductive Study of Tea Party Rhetoric Chair: Dr. Robert C. Rowland Date Approved: 5 September 7 2019 iii Abstract On February 19, 2009, CNBC journalist Rick Santelli’s fiery outburst against the Obama Administration on national television gave the Tea Party Movement (TPM) its namesake. Soon after rallies were organized across the U.S. under the Tea Party banner. From its inception in 2009, the TPM became an essential player in U.S. politics and pivotal in flipping control of the Senate and House to the Republican Party during the 2010 midterm elections. The movement faced controversy on both sides of the political spectrum for its beliefs and fervent stance against compromising with political adversaries. Researchers argued that the TPM was an example of Richard Hofstadter’s Paranoid Style. Others claimed that the movement’s rhetoric, member demographics, and political success demonstrated it was outside the boundaries of the Paranoid Style.
    [Show full text]
  • Still Only a Theory? America's Continuing
    Still Only a Theory? America’s Continuing Problem with Evolution Ken Miller Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, & Biochemistry Brown University 10/16/09 Sam Brownback We Live in Mike(Really) Huckabee Interesting Times Tom Tancredo I’m curious. Is there anybody on the stage that does not believe in evolution? Mike Huckabee: “If anybody wants to believe that they are the descendants of a primate, they are certainly welcome to do it.” Who’s to blame for humans being classified as primates? Not Charles Darwin. Carolus Linneaus: the father of modern scientific classifcation, and a creationist X “Deus creavit; Linneaus disposuit” TwoTwoEvolution StateFederal Elections isTrials an Issue GeorgiaKansas that Divides; ;Ohio PA Americans “If you believe in God, creation, & true science, vote for ” .... “If you believe in This textbook contains material on evolution. Debbie. Evolution is a theory, not a fact, regarding the origin of living things. This material should be approached with an open mind, evolution, abortion,studied carefully. and” critically & considered. sin, vote for her opponent Judgment Day What does “Intelligent Design” mean? • IDTheists, is the byproposition definition, that believe “design,” in a in the formtranscendent of outside intelligence, intelligent intervention, sometimes is requiredexpressed to as account a view for that the there origins is an of livingintelligent things. design to the universe. • This distinguishesBut thisID from is not more what is general considerationsmeant of meaning by ID. and purpose in the universe, and makes it a doctrine of special creation. 2004: The Dover (PA) school board votes for an “intelligent design” lesson in biology. The Dover Board followed a Discovery Institute playbook on ID, and purchased the textbook Of Pandas & People.
    [Show full text]
  • Trump's Conundrum for in Republicans
    V21, 28 Thursday, March 24, 2016 Trump’s conundrum for IN Republicans Leaders say they will support the ‘nominee,’ while McIntosh raises down-ballot alarms By BRIAN A. HOWEY BLOOMINGTON – GOP presidential front runner Donald J. Trump is just days away from his Indiana political debut, and Hoosier Republicans are facing a multi-faceted conundrum. Do they join the cabal seeking to keep the nominating number of delegates away from him prior to the Republi- can National Convention in July? This coming as Trump impugns the wife of Sen. Ted Cruz, threatening to “spill the beans” on her after two weeks of cam- paign violence and nativist fear mongering representing a sharp departure dent Mitch Daniels, former secretary of state Condoleezza modern Indiana internationalism. Rice, former senator Tom Coburn or former Texas governor Do they participate in a united front seeking an Rick Perry? alternative such as Sen. Ted Cruz, Ohio Gov. John Kasich, Or do they take the tack expressed by Gov. Mike or a dark horse consensus candidate such as Purdue Presi- Continued on page 3 Election year data By MORTON MARCUS INDIANAPOLIS – Let’s clarify some issues that may arise in this contentious political year. These data covering 2005 to 2015 may differ somewhat from those offered by other writers, speakers, and researchers. Why? These data are “This plan addresses our state’s from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ “Quarterly Census of immediate road funding needs Wages and Employment” via the while ensuring legislators come Indiana Department of Workforce Development’s Hoosiers by the back to the table next year ready Numbers website, where only the first three quarters of 2015 are to move forward on a long-term available.
    [Show full text]
  • International Trade Policy?”
    Conducted by the University of New Hampshire Survey Center Interviews with 1,010 adults in New Hampshire conducted by land line and cellular telephone on June 18-24, 2015 including 402 who say they plan to vote in the Republican presidential primary and 360 respondents who say they plan to vote in the Democratic presidential primary. The margin of sampling error for results based on Republican primary voters is plus or minus 4.9 percentage points and for results based on Democratic primary voters is plus or minus 5.2 percentage points. EMBARGOED FOR RELEASE: Thursday, June 25 at 5:00 p.m. CNN/WMUR/UNH Poll -1- June, 2015 (REPUBLICAN PRIMARY VOTERS ONLY:) "Next, I'd like to get your overall opinion of some REPUBLICANS who are running or may run for President in 2016. As I read each name, please say if you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of this person - or if you have never heard of him or her." "First, how about ... ROTATE 1 TO 19 1. (REPUBLICAN PRIMARY VOTERS ONLY:) “Former Florida Governor Jeb Bush?” (READ IF NECESSARY) "Would you say you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of him or don’t you know enough about him to say?" June 2015 FAVORABLE 50% NEITHER FAV. OR UNFAV. – VOLUNTEERED 12% UNFAVORABLE 33% DK / NEVER HEAR 5% 2. (REPUBLICAN PRIMARY VOTERS ONLY:) “Neurosurgeon Ben Carson?” (READ IF NECESSARY) "Would you say you have a favorable or unfavorable opinion of him or don’t you know enough about him to say?" June 2015 FAVORABLE 40% NEITHER FAV.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Evangelical Support For, and Opposition to Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election
    Portland State University PDXScholar Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 9-1-2020 Understanding Evangelical Support for, and Opposition to Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election Joseph Thomas Zichterman Portland State University Follow this and additional works at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds Part of the Political Science Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Zichterman, Joseph Thomas, "Understanding Evangelical Support for, and Opposition to Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election" (2020). Dissertations and Theses. Paper 5570. https://doi.org/10.15760/etd.7444 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of PDXScholar. Please contact us if we can make this document more accessible: [email protected]. Understanding Evangelical Support for, and Opposition to Donald Trump in the 2016 Presidential Election by Joseph Thomas Zichterman A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in Political Science Thesis Committee: Richard Clucas, Chair Jack Miller Kim Williams Portland State University 2020 Abstract This thesis addressed the conundrum that 81 percent of evangelicals supported Donald Trump in the 2016 presidential election, despite the fact that his character and comportment commonly did not exemplify the values and ideals that they professed. This was particularly perplexing to many outside (and within) evangelical circles, because as leaders of America’s “Moral Majority” for almost four decades, prior to Trump’s campaign, evangelicals had insisted that only candidates who set a high standard for personal integrity and civic decency, were qualified to serve as president.
    [Show full text]
  • CNN/ORC International Poll -- May 2 to 4, 2014
    Interviews with 1,008 adult Americans conducted by telephone by ORC International on May 2-4, 2014. The margin of sampling error for results based on the total sample is plus or minus 3 percentage points. The sample also includes 911 interviews among registered voters (plus or minus 3.5 percentage points) The sample includes 702 interviews among landline respondents and 306 interviews among cell phone respondents. FOR RELEASE: TUESDAY, MAY 6 AT 7:30 AM BASED ON 287 RESPONDENTS WHO DESCRIBE THEMSELVES AS REPUBLICANS AND 186 WHO DESCRIBE THEMSELVES AS INDEPENDENTS WHO LEAN REPUBLICAN, FOR A TOTAL OF 473 REPUBLICANS -- SAMPLING ERROR: +/- 4.5 PERCENTAGE PTS. 32. I'm going to read a list of people who may be running in the Republican primaries for president in 2016. After I read all the names, please tell me which of those candidates you would be most likely to support for the Republican nomination for president in 2016, or if you would support someone else. Former Florida Governor Jeb Bush, New Jersey Governor Chris Christie, Texas Senator Ted Cruz, Kentucky Senator Rand Paul, Texas Governor Rick Perry, Wisconsin Congressman Paul Ryan, Florida Senator Marco Rubio, former Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum, former Arkansas Governor Mike Huckabee or Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker. (RANDOM ORDER) May 2-4 Mar. 7-9 Jan. 31-Feb. 2 2014 2014 2014 Bush 13% 9% 10% Paul 13% 16% 13% Ryan 12% 15% 9% Huckabee 10% 10% 14% Christie 9% 8% 10% Perry 8% 11% 8% Cruz 7% 8% 8% Walker 7% NA NA Rubio 6% 5% 9% Santorum 2% 3% 4% Someone else (vol.) 4% 6% 8% None/No one (vol.) 4% 4% 3% No opinion 7% 5% 4% 33.
    [Show full text]