DOCSLIB.ORG

Email W/Attached ERM Draft Human Exposure Survey Workplan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Email W/Attached ERM Draft Human Exposure Survey Workplan Draft Human Exposure Survey Work Plan David Abranovic to: Ken Wangerud 12/21/2012 12:26 PM "[email protected]", Wendy OBrien, Dan Wall, "'Bill Brattin' Cc: ([email protected])", Robert Edgar, "'[email protected]' ([email protected])", "'Scott Everett' ([email protected])", "R. History: This message has been forwarded. Ken Please find attached the Draft Human Exposure Survey Work Plan for your review. I have included both a pdf of the entire document and a word file of the text. Feel free to contact me or Mark Jones at (916) 924-9378 anytime if you have any questions regarding this document. david _____________________________________ David J. Abranovic P.E. Partner ERM West, Inc. 7272 E. Indian School Road, Suite 100 Scottsdale, Arizona 85251 T: 480-998-2401 F: 480-998-2106 M: 602-284-4917 [email protected] www.erm.com One Planet. One Company. ERM. ü Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any attachment are confidential and may also contain privileged attorney-client information or work product. The message is intended only for the use of the addressee. If you are not the intended recipient, or the person responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you may not use, distribute, or copy this communication. If you have received the message in error, please immediately notify us by reply electronic mail or by telephone, and delete this original message. This message contains information which may be confidential, proprietary, privileged, or otherwise protected by law from disclosure or use by a third party. If you have received this message in error, please contact us immediately at (925) 946-0455 and take the steps necessary to delete the message completely from your computer system. Thank you. Please visit ERM's web site: http://www.erm.com This message contains information which may be confidential, proprietary, privileged, or otherwise protected by law from disclosure or use by a third party. If you have received this message in error, please contact us immediately at (303) 741-5050 and take the steps necessary to delete the message completely from your computer system. Thank you. Please visit ERM's web site: http://www.erm.com - USMag HE Survey WP Draft to USEPA.docx - Draft_HE_Survey_WP.pdf Draft Human Exposure Prepared for: Survey Work Plan US Magnesium, LLC Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study US Magnesium Site Rowley, Utah December 2012 The world’s leading sustainability consultancy US Magnesium, LLC Draft Human Exposure Survey Work Plan Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study US Magnesium Site Rowley, Utah December 2012 Project No. 0132320 David Abranovic Partner Project Manager Jennifer Holder, Ph.D. Partner Risk Assessment Leader Mark Jones Program Director ERM-West, Inc. 7272 E. Indian School Road, Suite 100 Scottsdale, AZ 85251 T: 480-998-2401 F: 480-998-2106 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS i LIST OF FIGURES iii LIST OF TABLES iii LIST OF ACRONYMS iv 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1-1 1.1 SITE BACKGROUND 1-2 1.2 STUDY AREA 1-2 1.3 CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL AND IDENTIFICATION OF HUMAN RECEPTORS 1-4 1.3.1 Current and Future Land Use 1-4 1.3.2 Relevant Exposure Scenarios – Receptors and Routes 1-4 2.0 SURVEY GOALS AND OBJECTIVES 2-1 2.1 STEP 1: STATE THE PROBLEM 2-1 2.2 STEP 2: IDENTIFY THE GOALS OF THE STUDY 2-2 2.3 STEP 3: IDENTIFY INFORMATION INPUTS 2-2 2.4 STEP 4: DEFINE THE BOUNDARIES OF THE STUDY 2-3 2.5 STEP 5: DEVELOP THE ANALYTICAL APPROACH 2-3 2.6 STEP 6: SPECIFY PERFORMANCE OR ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA 2-3 2.7 STEP 7: DEVELOP THE PLAN FOR OBTAINING DATA 2-5 3.0 LITERATURE REVIEW 3-1 4.0 EXPOSURE SURVEY DESIGN 4-1 4.1 STUDY POPULATION 4-1 4.1.1 On-Site US Magnesium Worker 4-2 i 4.1.2 Off-Site Workers at Adjacent Facilities 4-3 4.1.3 Federal and/or State Resource Managers 4-4 4.1.4 Off-Site Recreational Visitors 4-4 4.1.5 Ranchers 4-5 4.1.6 Seasonal Brine Shrimp Workers 4-6 4.2 CHARACTERIZATION OF RECREATIONAL VISITORS 4-6 4.3 SAMPLING METHODS 4-7 4.3.1 Small, Defined Subgroups (i.e., fewer than 30 People) 4-7 4.3.2 Large Subgroups 4-8 4.4 SURVEY IMPLEMENTATION 4-11 4.4.1 Pilot Survey 4-11 4.4.2 Survey Methods 4-11 4.4.3 Recruiting Strategy 4-12 4.4.4 Survey Team and Training Requirements 4-13 4.5 DRAFT SURVEY QUESTIONS 4-14 4.6 DATA PROCESSING 4-14 4.6.1 Data Entry 4-14 4.7 DEVELOPMENT OF EXPOSURE PARAMETERS 4-16 5.0 SUMMARY 5-1 6.0 REFERENCES 6-1 APPENDIX A — DRAFT HUMAN EXPOSURE SURVEY QUESTIONS ii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1- 1 Human Exposure Survey Flowchart Figure 1-2 Site Location Map Figure 1-3 Preliminary Remedial Investigation Areas Figure 1-4 Conceptual Site Model Figure 4-1 Camping and ATV Locations Figure 4-2 Box Elder Hunting Unit Figure 4-3 Fishing Locations LIST OF TABLES Table 4-1 US Magnesium Hourly Worker Schedules Table 4-2 Desired Sample Sizes for On-Site Workers Table 4-3 Desired Sample Sizes for ATI Employees iii LIST OF ACRONYMS ATV All-terrain vehicle BLM Bureau of Land Management CSM Conceptual site model CTE Central tendency exposure DQO Data quality objective DWR Department of Wildlife Resources ERM ERM-West, Inc. FS Feasibility study HHRA Human health risk assessment MWH Montgomery Watson Harza PRI Preliminary remediation investigation RI Remedial investigation RME Reasonable maximum exposure RSE Relative standard error SLC Salt Lake City US Mag US Magnesium, LLC USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency iv 1.0 INTRODUCTION ERM-West, Inc. (ERM) has been retained by US Magnesium, LLC (US Mag) to perform remedial investigation and feasibility study (RI/FS) services at the US Mag Site (the “Site”) located in Rowley, Utah. This Human Exposure Survey Work Plan (Work Plan) has been prepared by ERM and McDaniel Lambert, Inc., in accordance with the requirements of the Administrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent, which governs the performance of the RI/FS. The objective of the Work Plan is to develop a plan for collecting human exposure parameter data for specific receptors in the vicinity of the Site. This data will then be used to develop Site-specific exposure parameters for use in the baseline human health risk assessment (HHRA). It is also expected that survey responses will supply important qualitative information on the characteristics of the receptor groups and where and how they utilize the Site that can be used in the baseline HHRA to refine the conceptual site model (CSM) and exposure areas, if appropriate. The human exposure survey discussed in this Work Plan meets the quality objectives for the RI/FS, and is consistent with Section VIII, Paragraph 27 of the Administrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent (USEPA 2011a). The structure of this Work Plan is outlined below: Section 1 – Introduction; Section 2 – Survey Goals and Objectives; Section 3 – Literature Review; Section 4 – Exposure Survey Design; Section 5 – Summary; Section 6 – References; and Appendix A – Draft Survey Questions. As outlined in Figure 1-1, the development of human exposure data will be based on two main efforts: (1) a literature review to identify exposure parameters for populations similar to those at the Site, and (2) a survey of the human receptor populations that use the area within the 5-mile buffer around the Site. It is expected that the information collected from both efforts will be integral in developing the exposure parameters that will be used in the baseline HHRA. ERM 1-1 US MAGNESIUM/0132320 – DECEMBER 2012 1.1 SITE BACKGROUND The Site is in northwestern Utah (Tooele County) in the Basin and Range Province of the Western United States (Figure 1-2). The Site is located in the Lakeside Valley, approximately 1 to 3 miles west of the Great Salt Lake shoreline and approximately 5 miles east of the Lakeside Mountains (Figure 1-2). Elevation at the Site is approximately 4,220 feet above mean sea level, or about 8 feet above the maximum-recorded extent of the high lake elevation (Montgomery Watson Harza [MWH] 2003). US Mag is a commercial producer of magnesium and magnesium alloys derived from brine evaporated from Great Salt Lake water. The facility has been in production since 1972 and remains active. Operations at the US Mag facility utilize solar concentration of lake brine (approximately 0.4 percent magnesium chloride) followed by several chemical treatment steps designed to remove impurities and residual oxygen content. Following this initial process, the product then undergoes electrolysis to separate magnesium and chlorine. The chlorine gas byproduct is captured and reused or sold. Wastewaters from these processes are conveyed to an evaporation pond/lagoon at the facility. This wastewater has a low pH and is not returned to the Great Salt Lake. 1.2 STUDY AREA Based on discussions with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Region 6, the RI/FS study area includes the area within a 5-mile radius centered on the Site. Within this study area, the following preliminary remediation investigation (PRI) areas have been identified (Figure 1-3): PRI 1: Ditches; includes the Western Ditch, Central Ditch, Chlorine Ditch, Main Ditch, and former Boron Ditch. These ditches were constructed during the initial plant construction in the early 1970s. PRI 2: Landfill; approximately 36 acres, with 11 acres currently being used for disposal of municipal and construction waste from the Site.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Comprehensive Ecological Land Classification for Utah's West Desert
    Western North American Naturalist Volume 65 Number 3 Article 1 7-28-2005 A comprehensive ecological land classification for Utah's West Desert Neil E. West Utah State University Frank L. Dougher Utah State University and Montana State University, Bozeman Gerald S. Manis Utah State University R. Douglas Ramsey Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan Recommended Citation West, Neil E.; Dougher, Frank L.; Manis, Gerald S.; and Ramsey, R. Douglas (2005) "A comprehensive ecological land classification for Utah's West Desert," Western North American Naturalist: Vol. 65 : No. 3 , Article 1. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/wnan/vol65/iss3/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Western North American Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Western North American Naturalist 65(3), © 2005, pp. 281–309 A COMPREHENSIVE ECOLOGICAL LAND CLASSIFICATION FOR UTAH’S WEST DESERT Neil E. West1, Frank L. Dougher1,2, Gerald S. Manis1,3, and R. Douglas Ramsey1 ABSTRACT.—Land managers and scientists need context in which to interpolate between or extrapolate beyond discrete field points in space and time. Ecological classification of land (ECL) is one way by which these relationships can be made. Until regional issues emerged and calls were made for ecosystem management (EM), each land management institution chose its own ECLs. The need for economic efficiency and the increasing availability of geographic informa- tion systems (GIS) compel the creation of a national ECL so that communication across ownership boundaries can occur.
    [Show full text]
  • Quaternary Tectonics of Utah with Emphasis on Earthquake-Hazard Characterization
    QUATERNARY TECTONICS OF UTAH WITH EMPHASIS ON EARTHQUAKE-HAZARD CHARACTERIZATION by Suzanne Hecker Utah Geologiral Survey BULLETIN 127 1993 UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY a division of UTAH DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 0 STATE OF UTAH Michael 0. Leavitt, Governor DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Ted Stewart, Executive Director UTAH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY M. Lee Allison, Director UGSBoard Member Representing Lynnelle G. Eckels ................................................................................................... Mineral Industry Richard R. Kennedy ................................................................................................. Civil Engineering Jo Brandt .................................................................................................................. Public-at-Large C. Williatn Berge ...................................................................................................... Mineral Industry Russell C. Babcock, Jr.............................................................................................. Mineral Industry Jerry Golden ............................................................................................................. Mineral Industry Milton E. Wadsworth ............................................................................................... Economics-Business/Scientific Scott Hirschi, Director, Division of State Lands and Forestry .................................... Ex officio member UGS Editorial Staff J. Stringfellow .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Deterministic Earthquake Ground Motions Analysis
    A- A-rr"M"17- GEOMATRIX FINAL REPORT DETERMINISTIC EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS ANALYSIS PRIVATE FUEL STORAGE FACILITY SKULL VALLEY, UTAH Prepared for: Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation CS-028233 J.O. NO. 0599601-005 Prepared by: Geomatrix Consultants, Inc. and William Lettis & Associates, Inc. March 1997 GMX #3801.1 (REV. 9907160167 990709 0) PDR ADOCK 07200022 C PDR Geomatrix Consultants GEOMATRIX SWEC #0599601-005 GMX #3801-1 (REV. 0) DETERMINISTIC EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS ANALYSIS PRIVATE FUEL STORAGE FACILITY, SKULL VALLEY, UTAH Prepared for: Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation Prepared by: 01, Date: AZý-/d Reviewed by: ¢Date: 3/10/97 Kathryn L. Hanson Approved by: ' Date 3/10/97 Kevin J. Coppersmith QA Category I Geomatrix Consultants, Inc. San Francisco, CA GEOMATRIX TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1 2.0 SEISMOTECTONIC SETTING ................................................................................. 3 2.1 Seismotectonic Provinces ............................................................................................. 2.2 Tensile Stresses and Active Crustal Extension in the Site Region .......................... 5 3.0 REGIONAL POTENTIAL SEISMOGENIC SOURCES ........................................ 9 3.1 Potential Fault Sources Between 100 and 320 km of the Skull Valley Site ....... 9 3.2 Potential Fault Sources Within 100 km of the Skull Valley Site ......................... 11 3.2.1 Stansbury Fault
    [Show full text]
  • Potash Brines in the Great Salt Lake Desert, Utah
    Please do not destroy or throw away this publication. If you have no further use for it write to the Geological Survey at Washington and ask for a frank to return it DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Hubert Work, Secretary U. S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY George Otis Smith, Director Bulletin 795 B BY THOMAS B. NOLAN Contributions to economic geology, 1927, Part I (Pages 25-44) Published June 16,1927 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON ' 1927 CONTENTS Page Introduction___ 25 Location and settlement _ 26 History of development 26 Acknowledgments- ' _ -^ , 27 Bibliography____ 27 Method of prospecting 28 Geology______ - 29 General features _ 29 Surface features 30 Lake Bonneville beds _ 32 Calcareous clays and sands_____________ ________ 32 Salt___________________________________ 34 Brines __ _ 35 Origin of the brines___ _____ 40 Technical considerations __ _.___ _______________ 43 Summary- _ _ _ _ : ___ 44 ILLUSTEATION Page PLATE 3. Map showing the salinity of the brines underlying the Great Salt Lake Desert, Utah______________________ 40 n POTASH BRINES IN THE GREAT SALT LAKE.DESERT, UTAH By THOMAS B. NOLAN INTRODUCTION During and immediately after the war the brines of-the Salduro Marsh, in the Great Salt Lake Desert, were a source of considerable potash for the domestic supply. Although no p'otash has been pro­ duced from these brines in the last few years, a continued interest in the area has been shown by a large number of filings, in different parts of the desert, under the potash law of October 2, 1917 (40 Stat. 297), and the regulations issued under that law by the Department of the Interior on March 21, 1918, in Circular 594 (46 L.
    [Show full text]
  • Carpenter, R.M., Pandolfi, J.M., P.M. Sheehan. 1986. the Late Ordovian and Silurian of the Eastern Great
    MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM Contributions . In BIOLOGY and GEOLOGY Number 69 August 1, 1986 The Late Ordovician and Silurian of the Eastern Great Basin, Part 6: The Upper Ordovician Carbonate Ramp Roger M. Carpenter John M. Pandolfi Peter M. Sheehan MILWAUKEE PUBLIC MUSEUM Contributions . In BIOLOGY and GEOLOGY Number 69 August 1, 1986 The Late Ordovician and Silurian of the Eastern Great Basin, Part 6: The Upper Ordovician Carbonate Ramp Roger M. Carpenter, Department of Geology, Conoco Inc., 202 Rue Iberville, Lafayette, LA 70508; John M. Pandolfi, Department of Geology, University of California, Davis, California, 95616; Peter M. Sheehan, Department of Geology, Milwaukee Public Museum, 800W. Wells St., Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53233 ISBN 0-89326-122-X © 1986 Milwaukee Public Museum Abstract Two east-west transects examined in western Utah and eastern Nevada preserve Upper Ordovician-Lower Silurian lithofacies along a carbonate ramp transitional between a shelf and basin. Previous investigators have reconstructed this margin as a classic carbonate shelf with an abrupt, linear margin between shelf and slope. However, lithofacies change gradually between shelf and slope and are better explained by a carbonate ramp model. Intertidal and shallow subtidal dolomites are present to the east, with progressively deeper water limestones with increasing fine grained terrigenous content toward the west. Shelf edge reefs or shallow water carbonate margin buildups are absent. Latest Ordovician glacio-eustatic decline in sea level produced a period ofsubaerial exposure in the shallow eastern region. However, deposition continued deeper on the ramp, where shallow-water, cross laminated, massive dolomites were deposited during the glacio-eustatic regression. The carbonate ramp pattern was disrupted in the Middle or early part of the Late Llandovery, when an abrupt margin was established by listric growth faulting.
    [Show full text]
  • Late Quaternary Environmental Change in the Bonneville Basin, Western USA
    Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 167 (2001) 243±271 www.elsevier.nl/locate/palaeo Late Quaternary environmental change in the Bonneville basin, western USA D.B. Madsena,*, D. Rhodeb, D.K. Graysonc, J.M. Broughtond, S.D. Livingstonb, J. Hunta, J. Quadee, D.N. Schmitta, M.W. Shaver IIIa aUtah Geological Survey, Salt Lake City, UT 84116, USA bDesert Research Institute, Reno, NV 89512, USA cUniversity of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA dUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84102, USA eUniversity of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA Received 9 December 1999; received in revised form 24 July 2000; accepted for publication 7 September 2000 Abstract Excavation and analyses of small animal remains from strati®ed raptor deposits spanning the last 11.5 ka, together with collection and analysis of over 60 dated fossil woodrat midden samples spanning the last 50 ka, provide a detailed record of changing climate in the eastern Great Basin during the late Pleistocene and Holocene. Sagebrush steppe dominated the northern Bonneville basin during the Full Glacial, suggesting that conditions were cold and relatively dry, in contrast to the southern basin, which was also cold but moister. Limber pine woodlands dominated ,13±11.5 ka, indicating increased dryness and summer temperatures ,6±78C cooler than present. This drying trend accelerated after ,11.5 ka causing Lake Bonneville to drop rapidly, eliminating 11 species of ®sh from the lake. From ,11.5±8.2 ka xerophytic sagebrush and shadscale scrub replaced more mesophilic shrubs in a step-wise fashion. A variety of small mammals and plants indicate the early Holocene was ,38C cooler and moister than at present, not warmer as suggested by a number of climatic models.
    [Show full text]
  • Stratigraphy and Environmental Analysis of the Swan Peak Formation and Eureka Quartzite, Northern Utah
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 5-1972 Stratigraphy and Environmental Analysis of the Swan Peak Formation and Eureka Quartzite, Northern Utah George Gregory Francis Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Francis, George Gregory, "Stratigraphy and Environmental Analysis of the Swan Peak Formation and Eureka Quartzite, Northern Utah" (1972). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 1684. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/1684 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STRATIGRAPHY AND ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS OF THE SWAN PEAK FORMATION AND EUREKA QUARTZITE, NORTHERN UTAH by George Gregory Francis A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment· of the' requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Geology ADDr~d: (5o~ittee Membe;') Deal/of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 1972 ii ACKNOWLEDGMENT The author wishes to express his appreciation to Dr. Robert Q. Oaks for his technical assistance and inspiration throughout the study. Special thanks are due to Dr. J. Stewart Williams for identification of many Ordovician fossils, and to Dr. Donald R. Olsen and Dr. Williams for care­ ful reading of the manuscript and suggestions for its improvement. AppreCiation is extended to Walter Holmes, Calvin James, Robert Oaks, and Warren Schulingkamp for their assistance and companionship in the field. To Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resource Evaluation Report
    MINERAL RESOURCE EVALUATION OF LANDS SELECTED FOR THE UTAH TEST AND TRAINING RANGE EXCHANGE Prepared for the Utah School and Institutional Trust Lands Administration (Photo: Newfoundland Mountains viewed from the Hogup Mountains) by Andrew Rupke and Ken Krahulec June 2017 Utah Geological Survey a division of Utah Department of Natural Resources Although this product represents the work of professional scientists, the Utah Department of Natural Resources, Utah Geological Survey, makes no warranty, expressed or implied, regarding its suitability for a particular use. The Utah Department of Natural Resources, Utah Geological Survey, shall not be liable under any circumstances for any direct, indirect, special, incidental, or consequential damages with respect to claims by users of this product. CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................. 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 1 Background ..................................................................................................................... 1 Methods ........................................................................................................................... 2 GEOLOGIC SETTING ........................................................................................................ 2 INDUSTRIAL MINERALS ................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tooele I°X2° Quadrangle, Northwest Utah a CUSMAP Preassessment Study by Holly J
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Tooele I°x2° Quadrangle, Northwest Utah A CUSMAP Preassessment Study by Holly J. Stein1, Viki Bankey1, Charles G. Cunningham2, David R. Zimbelman1, David W. Brickey2* Michael Shubat3, David L. Campbell1, and Mel H. Podwysocki2 Prepared in cooperation with Utah Geological and Mineral Survey Open-File Report 89-0467 1989 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. ^.S. Geological Survey ^Jtah Geological and Mineral Survey Denver, Colorado 606 Black Hawk Way Salt Lake City, UT 84108-1280 2U.S. Geological Survey Reston, Virginia *Now at: EG&G Energy Measurements, Inc. P.O. Box 1912 M.S. H-02 Las Vegas, NV 89125 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PREFACE.......................................................... 7 SUMMARY.......................................................... 8 INTRODUCTION..................................................... 12 Scientific Gains............................................ 12 Industrial Profits.......................................... 13 Benefits to Other Agencies.................................. 13 GEOLOGY AND THE FORMATION OF MINERAL DEPOSITS.................... 15 The Oquirrh-Uinta Mineral Belt.............................. 15 Rock Types: Age, Structural History, and Relation to Ore Deposits.................................. 18 Precambrian Rocks...................................... 18 Mesozoic Plutons....................................... 22 Eocene and
    [Show full text]
  • Tooele County Emergency Management |
    TOOELE COUNTY Family ePremerParednessGency Guide Tooele County * WARNING: Public access to the Donner-Reed Trail and Lincoln Highway Geographical features, highways, locations and designations on this map are west of the Cedar Mountains is prohibited due to military property. only approximate renderings and do not represent relative scale. A B C D E F * WARNING: Public access to the Donner-Reed Trail and Lincoln Highway Geographical features, highways, locations and designations on this map are ○ Carrington Island west of the Cedar Mountains is prohibited due to military property. only approximate renderings and do not represent relative scale. R ISLAND MOUNTA VE INS L I S GREAT SALT LAKE Campbell Peak Floating Island RASSY MOUNTAINS G Cramer Peak 1 PUDDLE VALLEY DO NNE R-R EED TR ESIDE MOUNTAIN AI AK S L ( L NO A CC ES S) * ○ Stansbury Island BONNEVILLE SALT FLATS 2 Danger Cave Utah Tree 80 Wendover Knolls Hasting's Pass Delle Timpie 80 AR MOUNTAIN CED S Lake Point 3 GREAT SALT LAKE DESERT Stansbury Park West Canyon 138 SKULL VALLEY RD. Grantsville SBURY MOUNTAI Deseret Peak Erda TAN NS S Complex Lincoln North Willow Canyon SKULL VALLEY Grantsville Res. 112 Tooele South Willow Canyon Middle Canyon Deseret Peak Settlement Canyon Blue Lake Iosepa TOOELE VALLEY 36 4 South Mountain Tabbys Peak Hickman Canyon Rush Lake Wildcat Mountain Stockton Dry Canyon Skull Valley Jacob City Indian Reservation MORMON TRAIL RD. IRRH MOUNTAIN OQU S Rush Valley Ophir 5 White Rock Terra Clover Campground 199 RUSH VALLEY Dugway Mercur UI MOUNTA ONAQ INS Five Mile Twin Peaks 6 Pass Granite Peak 73 S)* CREEK MOUNTAI CES EEP NS AC D NO 7 ( 92 -1 19 OUTE 19 S R AY ES HW PR Gold Hill HIG EX LN NY CO 36 PO LIN Faust Pony Express info Davis Mountain 7 Montezuma Peak Vernon Lookout Pass Round Station Blood Mountain IBAPAH RD.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology of the Northern Onaqui Mountains, Tooele County, Utah
    BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY RESEARCH STUDIES Geology Series Vol. 3 No. I January, 1956 GEOLOGY OF THE NORTHERN ONAQUI MOUNTAINS, TOOELE COUNTY, UTAH by Mack G. Croft Brigham Young University Department of Geology Provo, Utah GEOLOGY OF THE NORTHERN ONAQUI MOUNTAINS TOO= COUNTY, UTAH A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the Department of Geology Brigham Young University In Partial Fulfient of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science by Mack G. Croft Januasy, 1956 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The writer, in the preparation of this thesis, is grateful for the assistance and suggestions of Drs. J. Keith Rigby, Kenneth C. Bullock, and H. J. Bissell. The writer also wishes to acknowledge Roland B. Woodland and other faculty members and students of the Department of Geology, Brigham Young University. iii TUIX OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS ........................ vi INTRODUCTION Location and Accessibility ................... 1 PwsicdFeatures ........................ 1 Climate and Vegetation ..................... 4 Swmnary of Previous Investigations TheGreatBasin ...................... 4 The Onaqui Mountains and Vicinity .............. 5 Field and Laboratory Studies .................. 6 GENEXNL GEOLOGY Sedimentary Rocks ............ Ordovician System Swan Peak Quartzite ....... Pre-Upper Ordovician Unconformity Fish Haven Dolomite ....... Silurian System Laketown Dolomite ........ Devonian System Sevy-Simonson Dolomite (~ndiff.) Mississippian System Gardner Dolomite ........ Pine Canyon Limestone ...... Hwnbug Format ion ........ Great Blue
    [Show full text]
  • A Synthesis of Archaeological Studies on the Utah Test and Training Range
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional Depository) Depository) 1999 A Synthesis of Archaeological Studies on the Utah Test and Training Range U.S. Air Force Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/govdocs Part of the Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment Commons Recommended Citation U.S. Air Force, "A Synthesis of Archaeological Studies on the Utah Test and Training Range" (1999). All U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional Depository). Paper 489. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/govdocs/489 This Report is brought to you for free and open access by the U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional Depository) at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All U.S. Government Documents (Utah Regional Depository) by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 1111111111111111111111111111111 PB99-178055 A SYNTHESIS OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL STUDIES []N THE UTAH TEST AND TRAINING RANGE u.s. Air Force Air Force Materiel Command Hill Air Force Base, Utah REPRODUCED BY: tIJ]S. u.s. Department of Commerce National Technicallnfonnation Service Springfield, Virginia 22161 Form Approved REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188), Washington, DC 20503.
    [Show full text]