DOCSLIB.ORG

European Patent Convention

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

No. 16208 MULTILATERAL Convention on the Grant of European Patents (European Patent Convention) (with Implementing Regulations, Protocol on Jurisdiction and the Recognition of Deci sions in Respect of the Right to the Grant of a Euro pean Patent, Protocol on Privileges and Immunities of the European Patent Organisation, Protocol on the Centralisation of the European Patent System and on its Introduction, and Protocol on the Interpretation of article 69 of the Convention). Concluded at Munich on 5 October 1973 Authentic texts: German, English and French, Registered by the Federal Republic of Germany on 11 January 1978. MULTILATERAL Convention sur la délivrance de brevets européens (Con vention sur le brevet européen) [avec Règlement d'exécution, Protocole sur la compétence judiciaire et la reconnaissance de décisions portant sur le droit à l'ob tention du brevet européen, Protocole sur les privilèges et immunités de l'Organisation européenne des brevets, Protocole sur la centralisation et l'introduction du système européen des brevets, et Protocole interprétatif de l'article 69 de la Convention]. Conclue à Munich le 5 octobre 1973 Textes authentiques : allemand, anglais et français. Enregistrée par la République fédérale d'Allemagne le 11 janvier 1978. Vol. 1065,1-16208 1978 United Nations — Treaty Series • Nations Unies — Recueil des Traités 255 CONVENTION1 ON THE GRANT OF EUROPEAN PATENTS (EURO PEAN PATENT CONVENTION) CONTENTS Preamble Art. 18. Examining Divisions Part I. General and institutional provisions Art. 19. Opposition Divisions Art. 20. Legal Division Chapter I. General provisions Art. 21. Boards of Appeal Art. 1. European law for the grant of Art. 22. Enlarged Board of Appeal patents Art. 23. Independence of the members of Art. 2. European patent the Boards Art. 3. Territorial effect Art. 24. Exclusion and objection Art. 4. European Patent Organisation Art. 25. Technical opinion Chapter II. The European Patent Organi Chapter IV. The Administrative Council sation Art. 26. Membership Art. 5. Legal status Art. 27. Chairmanship Art. 6. Seat Art. 28. Board Art. 7. Sub-offices of the European Patent Office Art. 29. Meetings Art. 8. Privileges and immunities Art. 30. Attendance of observers Art. 9. Liability Art. 31. Languages of the Administrative Council Chapter III. The European Patent Office Art. 32. Staff, premises and equipment Art. 10. Direction Art. 33. Competence of the Administra tive Council in certain cases Art. 11. Appointment of senior employees Art. 34. Voting rights Art. 12. Duties of office Art. 35. Voting rules Art. 13. Disputes between the Organisa Art. 36. Weighting of votes tion and the employees of the European Patent Office Chapter V. Financial provisions Art. 14. Languages of the European Art. 37. Cover for expenditure Patent Office Art. 38. The Organisation©s own resour Art. 15. The departments charged with ces the procedure Art. 39. Payments by the Contracting Art. 16. Receiving Section States in respect of renewal fees Art. 17. Search Divisions for European patents 1 Came into force in respect of the following countries on 7 October 1977, i.e., three months after the date of deposit with the Government of the Federal Republic of Germany of the last instrument of ratification or accession by six States on whose territory the total number of patent applications filed in 1970 amounted to 180,000 for all the said States, in ac cordance with article 169 (1): Date of deposit Date of deposit of the instrument of the instrument Slate of ratification State of ratification Germany, Federal Republic of..... 7 July 1976 France........................... i July 1977 Netherlands ............,-...... 28 February 1977 (Including the French Overseas Ter United Kingdom of Great Britain ritories and Departments.) and Northern Ireland .......... 3 March 1977 Luxembourg ..................... 7 July 1977 (Including the Isle of Man.) Belgium ......................... 14 July 1977 Switzerland..................... 20 April 1977 Vol. 1065,1-16208 256 United Nations — Treaty Series • Nations Unies — Recueil des Traités 1978 Art. 40. Level of fees and payments Art. 68. Effect of revocation of the Euro Special financial contributions pean patent Art. 41. Advances Art. 69. Extent of protection Art. 42. Budget Art. 70. Authentic text of a European Art. 43. Authorisation for expenditure patent application or European Art. 44. Appropriations for unforesee patent able expenditure Chapter IV. The European patent application Art. 45. Accounting period as an object of property Art. 46. Preparation and adoption of the budget Art. 71. Transfer and constitution of Art. 47. Provisional budget rights Art. 48. Budget implementation Art. 72. Assignment Art. 49. Auditing of accounts Art. 73. Contractual licensing Art. 50. Financial Regulations Art. 74. Law applicable Art. 51. Rules relating to Fees Part III. Application for European Patents Part II. Substantive Patent Law Chapter I. Filing and requirements of the European patent application Chapter I. Patentability Art. 75. Filing of the European patent Art. 52. Patentable inventions application Art. 53. Exceptions to patentability Art. 76. European divisional applications Art. 54. Novelty Art. 77. Forwarding of European patent Art. 55. Non-prejudicial disclosures applications Art. 56. Inventive step Art. 78. Requirements of the European Art. 57. Industrial application patent application Art. 79. Designation of Contracting Chapter II. Persons entitled to apply for and States obtain European patents Men Art. 80. Date of filing tion of the inventor Art. 81. Designation of the inventor Art. 58. Entitlement to file a European Art. 82. Unity of invention patent application Art. 83. Disclosure of the invention Art. 59. Multiple applicants Art. 84. The claims Art. 60. Right to a European patent Art. 85. The abstract Art. 61. European patent applications by persons not having the right to a Art. 86. Renewal fees for European European patent patent applications Art. 62. Right of the inventor to be men Chapter II. Priority tioned Art. 87. Priority right Chapter III. Effects of the European patent and the European patent appli Art. 88. Claiming priority cation Art. 89. Effect of priority right Art. 63. Term of the European patent Part IV. Procedure up to grant Art. 64. Rights conferred by a European patent Art. 90. Examination on filing Art. 65. Translation of the specification Art. 91. Examination as to formal of the European patent requirements Art. 66. Equivalence of European filing Art. 92. The drawing up of the European with national filing search report Art. 67. Rights conferred by a European Art. 93. Publication of a European patent application after publi patent application cation Art. 94. Request for examination Vol. 1065,1-16208 1978 United Nations — Treaty Series Nations Unies — Recueil des Traités 257 Art. 95. Extension of the period within Art. 124. Information concerning national which requests for examination patent applications may be filed Art. 125. Reference to general principles Art. 96. Examination of the European Art. 126. Termination of financial obliga patent application tions Art. 97. Refusal or grant Art. 98. Publication of a specification of Chapter II. Information to the public or the European patent official authorities Part V. Opposition procedure Art. 127. Register of European Patents Art. 128. Inspection of files Art. 99. Opposition Art. 129. Periodical publications Art. 100. Grounds for opposition Art. 130. Exchanges of information Art. 101. Examination of the opposition Art. 131. Administrative and legal coopera Art. 102. Revocation or maintenance of the tion European patent Art. 132. Exchange of publications Art. 103. Publication of a new specification of the European patent Chapter III. Representation Art. 104. Costs Art. 133. General principles of representa Art. 105. Intervention of the assumed in- tion fringer Art. 134. Professional representatives Part VI. Appeals procedure Part VIII. Impact on National Law Art. 106. Decisions subject to appeal Chapter I. Conversion into a national patent Art. 107. Persons entitled to appeal and to application be parties to appeal proceedings Art. 135. Request for the application of Art. 108. Time limit and form of appeal national procedure Art. 109. Interlocutory revision Art. 136. Submission and transmission of Art. 110. Examination of appeals the request Art. 111. Decision in respect of appeals Art. 137. Formal requirements for conver Art. 112. Decision or opinion of the En sion larged Board of Appeal Chapter II. Revocation and prior rights Part VII. Common provisions Art. 138. Grounds for revocation Chapter I. Common provisions governing Art. 139. Rights of earlier date or the same procedure date Art. 113. Basis of decisions Chapter III. Miscellaneous effects Art. 114. Examination by the European Art. 140. National utility models and utility Patent Office of its own motion certificates Art. 115. Observations by third parties Art. 141. Renewal fees for European Art. 116. Oral proceedings patents Art. 117. Taking of evidence Part IX. Special agreements Art. 118. Unity of the European patent application or European patent Art. 142. Unitary patents Art. 119. Notification Art. 143. Special departments of the Euro Art. 120. Time limits pean Patent Office Art. 121. Further processing of the Euro Art. 144. Representation before special de pean patent application partments Art. 122. Restitutio in integrum Art. 145. Select committee of the Adminis Art. 123. Amendments trative Council Vol. 1065,1-16208 258 United Nations — Treaty
Recommended publications
  • Library Start Your Business: Draft a Patent Application

    Library Start Your Business: Draft a Patent Application

    Library Start Your Business: Draft a Patent Application Azalea Ebbay Librarian, San Diego Public Library Roya Bagheri Staff Attorney, San Diego Volunteer Lawyer Program, Inc. Paul Yen Primary Examiner, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office June 10, 2020 Library Overview • Patent and Trademark Resource Center with Azalea Ebbay • San Diego Volunteer Lawyer Program, Inc. with Roya Bagheri • Learn How to Draft a Patent Application with Paul Yen Library Patent and Trademark Resource Center • Provide free access to patent and trademark resources provided by the USPTO • Direct you to information and explain the application process and fee schedule • Demonstrate how to use patent and trademark search tools • Show you a directory of local patent attorneys and agents who are licensed to practice before the USPTO • Assists with patent searches for an ancestor’s inventions • Offers free educational programs Note: We cannot provide business or legal advice. We cannot perform patent or trademark 2019 Start Your Business event searches. with San Diego Volunteer Lawyer Program, Inc. and Procopio Library Teaching patents to high school students for UCSD Rady School of Management’s LaunchPad Kid’s Invent It Month, a program children’s themed program Library You can borrow free small business eBooks with your library card on CloudLibrary. You can also pick up your holds at select San Diego Public Library locations. Library Our Final Event with the U.S.P.T.O. Trademark Application Walk-through with Jason Lott Date: June 17th Time: 2-3:30 p.m. PST Registration website: https://sandiego.librarymarket.com/events/start-your-business-trademark-application-w alk-through-webex-event Any questions? Azalea Ebbay, San Diego Public Library [email protected] (619) 238-6683 San Diego Volunteer Lawyer Program, Inc.
  • Patent Prior Art and Possession

    Patent Prior Art and Possession

    William & Mary Law Review Volume 60 (2018-2019) Issue 1 Article 4 10-15-2018 Patent Prior Art and Possession Timothy R. Holbrook Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons, and the Property Law and Real Estate Commons Repository Citation Timothy R. Holbrook, Patent Prior Art and Possession, 60 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. 123 (2018), https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr/vol60/iss1/4 Copyright c 2018 by the authors. This article is brought to you by the William & Mary Law School Scholarship Repository. https://scholarship.law.wm.edu/wmlr PATENT PRIOR ART AND POSSESSION TIMOTHY R. HOLBROOK* ABSTRACT Prior art in patent law defines the set of materials that the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and courts use to determine whether the invention claimed in a patent is new and non- obvious. One would think that, as a central, crucial component of patent law, prior art would be thoroughly theorized and doctrinally coherent. Nothing could be further from the truth. The prior art provisions represent an ad hoc codification of various policies and doctrines that arose in the courts. This Article provides coherency to this morass. It posits a prior art system that draws upon property law’s conception of possession. Possession operates when an actor asserts dominion over a resource or object in a way that communicates that assertion to third parties. In this way, public availability becomes the key lodestar to prior art. In the prior art context, the possession framework would divide prior art into two categories: prior art generated by third parties and prior art generated by the patent applicant herself.
  • Secret Prior Art – Time for Another Look Secret Prior Art –Time for by Andrew Berks* Another Look

    Secret Prior Art – Time for Another Look Secret Prior Art –Time for by Andrew Berks* Another Look

    A Publication of the New York Intellectual Property Law Association April/May 2017 The Report In This Issue Secret Prior Art – Time for Another Look Secret Prior Art –Time for By Andrew Berks* Another Look ......................1,4-7 ecret prior art” refers to a pat- files the application, even if the other President’s Corner ......................2-3 “Sent application that is effective person’s work was totally unknown to as a prior art reference as of its filing the inventor, then the subject invention In Memoriam date, even though it does not become fails the novelty test and should not be MARY RICHARDSON .............. 3 known to the public until its publi- entitled to a patent. cation date.1 These types of prior art But as a form of public disclosure, A Statistical Look at PTAB references, falling within the scope there is a special class of patent Post-Grant Proceedings .........8-11 of 35 U.S.C. § 102(a)(2) (or pre-AIA applications that may qualify as prior § 102(e)), have long been surrounded art: those that were filed before but PTAB Developments by controversy in obviousness-type published after the subject patent Involving CRISPR- invalidity arguments.2 This paper ex- application was filed. These so-called Cas9 Gene Editing amines the nature and history of this “secret prior art” patent applications Technology .........................12-15 problem and proposes a solution. are an artifact of the inherent delays in patent office procedures. For 95thAnnual Dinner in I. Conditions for Patentability example, in the United States, prior Honor of the Federal It is axiomatic under modern to 2000, patent applications were Judiciary .............................16-17 patent law systems that a patent claim kept secret until they issued.
  • European Patent Procedure Explained

    European Patent Procedure Explained

    European Patent Procedure Explained Patents in Europe When protecting an invention in Europe, you can either file a single European patent application covering 40 member states, or you can file individual national patent applications in each separate European state where you require patent protection. In general, if you require patent protection in more than a single national European state, it is likely to be more cost effective to file a European patent application under the European Patent Convention. European patent applications can take quite a long time to process. The average prosecution from filing to a decision on grant is around 44 months. Prosecution can be quicker in some individual national states. This is particularly true in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland. Additionally, short term patents (known as petty patents, or utility models), where there is generally a novelty requirement and either no inventive step requirement, or a lower level of inventive step requirement than for a European patent or a standard national patent, are available in some European states, for example Germany and Italy. These may have a cost or speed advantage over a standard national patent, or a European patent. However, for most inventions originating outside Europe, the European patent under the European Patent Convention, is the primary form of protection. European Patent - Overall Procedure From filing to grant, the stages are: - Filing the application: A full description, claims, abstract and where appropriate drawings, must be supplied at the point of filing. An application fee and search fee are also due on filing. The application can be filed in any official language of a member state, but a translation into English, French or German, the three official languages of the European Patent Convention, must be supplied shortly after filing.
  • Overview of Section 101 Patent Cases Decided After Alice V

    Overview of Section 101 Patent Cases Decided After Alice V

    CHART OF POST-ALICE CASES (as of March 1, 2019) OVERVIEW PAGE I. CLAIMS INELIGIBLE UNDER ALICE ........................................................................................................................................... 2 A. Software/Tech Patents (359 total) 1. Federal Circuit Decisions (52 total) ....................................................................................................................................2 2. District Court Decisions (307 total) ..................................................................................................................................24 B. Biotechnology/Life Sciences Patents (37 total) 1. Federal Circuit Decisions (6 total) .....................................................................................................................................86 2. District Court Decisions (31 total) .....................................................................................................................................90 II. CLAIMS ELIGIBLE UNDER ALICE ............................................................................................................................................ 99 A. Software/Tech Patents (170 total) 1. Federal Circuit Decisions (13 total) ...................................................................................................................................99 2. District Court Decisions (157) .........................................................................................................................................105
  • Examining the Abstract of Title

    Examining the Abstract of Title

    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UND Scholarly Commons (University of North Dakota) North Dakota Law Review Volume 46 Number 2 Article 1 1969 Examining the Abstract of Title J. Philip Johnson Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.und.edu/ndlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Johnson, J. Philip (1969) "Examining the Abstract of Title," North Dakota Law Review: Vol. 46 : No. 2 , Article 1. Available at: https://commons.und.edu/ndlr/vol46/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the School of Law at UND Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in North Dakota Law Review by an authorized editor of UND Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EXAMINING THE ABSTRACT OF TITLE J. PHILIP JOHNSON* Introduction Many otherwise experienced lawyers express dismay when a client appears with an abstract of title in hand. Even within the generalized practice of North Dakota, there are relatively few attorneys that handle the great majority of title examinations, usually in connection with the mortgaging of the property. There is no deep secret to the examination process but there is a certain amount of background and a few rules of practice that can be extremely helpful. The following is offered as an explanation and aid for title examination within this region and particularly this state. 1. HISTORY OF THE ABSTRACT-OPINION SYSTEM The system of real estate title examination common to the upper midwest region of the United States is based upon the opinion of a lawyer gained from examination of an abstract of the real estate records.
  • Chapter 6: Novely Under Pre-Aia Law A. Introduction

    Chapter 6: Novely Under Pre-Aia Law A. Introduction

    CHAPTER 6: NOVELY UNDER PRE-AIA LAW A. INTRODUCTION TO THE PRE-AIA VERSION OF § 102 .................................................... 1 B. § 102(b): THE GENERAL STATUTORY BARS ...................................................................... 3 C. §§ 102(c) & (d): RARE STATUTORY BARS ........................................................................... 6 1. Section 102(c): Abandonment ................................................................................................ 6 2. § 102(d): Late U.S. Application After Foreign Patenting ....................................................... 7 D. NOVELTY (REFERENCES TESTED BY INVENTION DATE) .......................................... 10 1. § 102(a): Publicly Available Prior Art .................................................................................. 11 2. § 102(e): Disclosures in U.S. Patent Applications ................................................................ 17 3. § 102(g)(1): Inventions Claimed in U.S. Applications ......................................................... 21 4. § 102(g)(2): Inventions Made In the United States ............................................................... 21 E. DATES OF INVENTION AND PRIORITY ............................................................................ 21 1. § 102(g)(1): Determining Priority in Interferences ............................................................... 24 a. Conception, Diligence and Reduction to Practice ............................................................ 25 b. “Abandoned,
  • MPEP § National Fees, and Publication of the Application

    MPEP § National Fees, and Publication of the Application

    Chapter 1800 Patent Cooperation Treaty 1801 Basic Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) 1834 Correspondence Principles 1834.01 Filing of Correspondence by 1802 PCT De®nitions Facsimile 1803 Reservations Under the PCT Taken by, 1834.02 Irregularities in the Mail or Electronic and Noti®cations of Incompatibility Communications Service Made by, the United States of America 1835 [Reserved] 1804 [Reserved] 1836 Recti®cation of Obvious Mistakes 1805 Where To File an International 1837 [Reserved] Application -1839 1806 Applicants and Inventors 1840 The International Searching Authority 1807 Agent or Common Representative and 1840.01 The European Patent Of®ce as an General Power of Attorney International Searching Authority 1808 Change in or Revocation of the 1840.02 The Korean Intellectual Property Appointment of an Agent or a Common Of®ce as an International Searching Representative Authority 1809 PAIR Access 1840.03 The Australian Patent Of®ce (IP 1810 Filing Date Requirements Australia) as an International 1811 [Reserved] Searching Authority 1812 Elements of the International 1840.04 The Federal Service for Intellectual Application Property (Rospatent) (Russian 1813 [Reserved] Federation) as an International -1816 Searching Authority 1817 PCT Member States 1840.05 The Israel Patent Of®ce (ILPO) as an 1818 [Reserved] International Searching Authority 1819 Earlier Search 1840.06 The Japan Patent Of®ce (JPO) as an 1820 Signature of Applicant International Searching Authority 1821 The Request 1840.07 The Intellectual Property Of®ce of 1822 [Reserved]

  • Prior Art, Classification, and Search

    Chapter 900 Prior Art, Classification, and Search 903.07 Classifying and Cross-Referencing 901 Prior Art at Allowance 901.01 Canceled Matter in U.S. Patent Files 903.07(a) Cross-Referencing — Keep Systematic 901.02 Abandoned Applications Notes During Prosecution 901.03 Pending Applications 903.07(b) Issuing in Another Technology Center 901.04 U.S. Patents Without Transfer 901.04(a) Kind Codes 903.08 Applications: Assignment and Transfer 901.05 Foreign Patent Documents 903.08(a) New Applications 901.05(a) Citation Data 903.08(b) Classification and Assignment to Examiner 901.05(b) Other Significant Data 903.08(c) Immediate Inspection of Amendments 901.05(c) Obtaining Copies 903.08(d) Transfer Procedure 901.05(d) Translation 903.08(e) General Regulations Governing the 901.06 Nonpatent Publications Assignment of Nonprovisional 901.06(a) Scientific and Technical Information Applications for Examination Center (STIC) 903.09 International Classification of Patents 901.06(b) Borrowed Publications for Inventions 901.06(c) Alien Property Custodian Publications 903.09(a) Locarno Classification Designations 901.06(d) Abstracts, Abbreviatures, and Defensive 904 How to Search Publications 904.01 Analysis of Claims 901.07 Arrangement of Art in Technology Centers 904.01(a) Variant Embodiments Within Scope 901.08 Borrowing References of Claim 902 Search Tools and Classification Information 904.01(b) Equivalents 902.01 Manual of Classification 904.01(c) Analogous Arts 902.01(a) Index to the U.S. Patent Classification System 904.02 General Search Guidelines
  • European Patent Convention) of 5 October 1973 As Revised by the Act Revising Article 63 EPC of 17 December 1991 and the Act Revising the EPC of 29 November 20001

    European Patent Convention) of 5 October 1973 As Revised by the Act Revising Article 63 EPC of 17 December 1991 and the Act Revising the EPC of 29 November 20001

    Convention on the Grant of European Patents (European Patent Convention) of 5 October 1973 as revised by the Act revising Article 63 EPC of 17 December 1991 and the Act revising the EPC of 29 November 20001 Footnotes and cross-references are added for the convenience of the reader; they do not form part of the official text. 1 The new text of the Convention adopted by the Administrative Council of the European Patent Organisation by decision of 28 June 2001 (see OJ EPO 2001, Special edition No. 4, p. 55) has become an integral part of the Revision Act of 29 November 2000 under Arti- cle 3(2), second sentence, of that Act. 1 European Patent Convention April 2021 PREAMBLE 8 PART I GENERAL AND INSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS 9 Chapter I General provisions 9 Article 1 European law for the grant of patents 9 Article 2 European patent 9 Article 3 Territorial effect 9 Article 4 European Patent Organisation 9 Article 4a Conference of ministers of the Contracting States 10 Chapter II The European Patent Organisation 10 Article 5 Legal status 10 Article 6 Headquarters 10 Article 7 Sub-offices of the European Patent Office 10 Article 8 Privileges and immunities 10 Article 9 Liability 11 Chapter III The European Patent Office 11 Article 10 Management 11 Article 11 Appointment of senior employees 12 Article 12 Duties of office 13 Article 13 Disputes between the Organisation and the employees of the European Patent Office 13 Article 14 Languages of the European Patent Office, European patent applications and other documents 13 Article 15 Departments entrusted
  • Title Glossary

    Title Glossary

    GLOSSARY A Word About Title Language The title industry has its own language. Many of its words and idioms are derived from the language of the law while others are common words given special meaning related to land titles. There are also words and phrases coined over the years by the title industry itself. While functions of the title industry are substantially the same throughout the nation, words describing or relating to the same thing often differ considerably in various parts of the country. Also, in many instances, several different words have substantially the same meaning. You will learn that a "closing" in one area is called a "settlement" in another; that a "take-off" is not a strip tease, or a "joint take-off" a marijuana orgy. You will also learn that a title plant is not something green growing in a garden; that an attachment is not an amorous affinity; that a suit is not a garment or wearing apparel; that an execution is not a public hanging; that prescription is not medication prepared at a drug store; that "writ" is not a colloquial past participle of "write;" that to condemn is not to censure or criticize; and that courts which deal with wills and estates of deceased persons are called "Ordinary's Court" in some states, in others "Orphan's Court," while in others they are called "Probate Court" and in still others, "Surrogate Court". Title company employees should know their industry's language. To assist you in this regard we have compiled this glossary of words and terms used in the title industry.
  • Prior Art in Inter Partes Review

    Prior Art in Inter Partes Review

    E15_YELDERMAN (DO NOT DELETE) 7/15/2019 9:44 PM Prior Art in Inter Partes Review Stephen Yelderman* ABSTRACT: This Essay is an empirical study of the evidence the Patent Trial and Appeal Board relies upon when cancelling patents in inter partes review. To construct our dataset, we collected every final written decision invalidating a patent claim over a twelve-month period. We coded individual invalidation events on a reference-by-reference, claim-by-claim basis. Drawing on this dataset, we report a number of details about the prior art supporting patent cancellation, including the frequency with which U.S. patents, foreign patents, and printed publications were cited, the frequency with which the invalidating prior art would have been amenable to a pre-filing prior art search, and whether the invalidating prior art was known at the time of examination. I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................... 2706 II. BACKGROUND ............................................................................. 2709 III. METHODOLOGY .......................................................................... 2715 A. COLLECTION AND CODING ..................................................... 2715 B. SELECTION EFFECTS ............................................................... 2717 IV. RESULTS ...................................................................................... 2719 A. ANTICIPATION VS. OBVIOUSNESS ............................................ 2719 B. CATEGORIES OF PRIOR ART ...................................................