Sierra Leone

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Sierra Leone SIERRA LEONE Country correspondent: Me/ron C Nicoi-Wilson; LLB (Hons) (Sierra Leone), LLM (Human Rights and Constitutional Practice) (Pretoria), BL; Barrister and Solicitor of the High Court of Sierra Leone and Executive Director, Lawyers' Centre for Legal Assistance, Sierra Leone ( 1) BASIC FACTS Independence: 27 April 1961, former British colony Leader: Ahmed Tejan Kabbah, born 1932, head of state since1996 Capital: Freetown (main seaport and international airport) Other major city: Bo, Kenema, Makeni Area: 71 740 km 2 Population: 5,2, mn (2000) Population growth: 2,6% Urbanisation: 40% (2000) Languages: English (official), Temne, Limba, Mende, Krio HDI rank: 162 {1999) Life expectancy at birth: 38 years ( 1999) Adult literacy rate: 32% (1999) Gross enrolment ratio (all educational levels): 27% ( 1994) GNP: $762 mn GNP/capita: $180 (1995) GDP (average annual growth rate): -4,2% (1990-95) Foreign debt: $1 226 mn (1995); as% of GNP: 161% Development aid: $188 mn {1995); as% of GNP: 28% Currency: Leone (Le) Comments: Decades of bad government have ruined the fragile economy. The transition from single-party to multi-party politics was disrupted by the civil war in neighbouring Liberia, which spilt over into Sierra Leone. Junior army officers overthrew President Joseph Momoh's government in April 1992 and Captain Valentine Strasser became the military ruler. In January 1996 Strasser was deposed by military colleagues who restored civilian rule after multi-party elections held in February-March 1996. The ECOMOG states, led by Nigeria, intervened militarily when, in May and June 1997, junior military officers overthrew the government of President Ahmed Tejan Kabbah, but without success. By March 1998 the rebels had been driven from the capital and President Kabbah and his cabinet were re­ instated. The civil war nevertheless continued, until 2001 when a large United Nations peacekeeping force began to gain control of the situation. On the Special Court for Sierra Leone, see volume I of this publication. (2) COUNTRY REPORT Historical background Early history: The earliest inhabitants of Sierra Leone are the Limbas and the Sherbros. Most of today's ethnic groups entered the country after 1400 as a result of disturbances elsewhere in the region. In 1427 a Portuguese explorer, Pedro DA Cintra visited the country and gave it the name " Sierra Lyoa" which in Portuguese means "Lion Mountain"- after the shape of the Freetown peninsular. The name was later changed to Sierra Leone. Inhabitants of the country were taken into slavery during the slave trade. In 1787, 356 "Black Poor" and 100 whites left Britain to establish a colony in Sierra Leone, although few survived their first two years. 1474 SIERRA LEONE In 1792, 200 freed slaves, many of them refugees from the American war of independence, arrived from Halifax and established a permanent settlement they called Freetown (the present capital). The settlers became known as the Creoles, over time developing their own language, "Krio", based on English. 1791: On 6 June 1791 the British House of Commons passed the Sierra Leone Company Act, setting up a Government for Sierra Leone, colonial in form and content, controlled by the Directors of a Company of Merchants resident in England. 1808 - 1938: On 1 January 1808 the British Government declared a Sierra Leone a Crown Colony and extended its influence and rule to the rest of the country in 1896. A Governor was sent from Britain to administer the country. On 26 September 1812, the Governor established a Court (Act No 6 of 181 2). 1951 - 1956: The British Government issued an Order in Council, Public Notice No 1 06 of 1951, which introduced the 1 951 Constitution of Sierra Leone. This Constitution provided for a Legislative and Executive Council and for an unofficial majority. It intended to introduce representative government. A statutory instrument of 1956 changed the title of the legislature from Legislative Council to House of Representatives. 1961: On 14 April the Sierra Leone Constitution Order in Council was laid before the British Parliament. The Constitution of Sierra Leone was an Appendix to the Order. Parliament then passed the Sierra Leone Independence Act 1961 and so relinquished responsibility for the Government of Sierra Leone, transferring its powers and authorities therein to the Government and people of Sierra Leone. The Constitution for the first time in the history of the country contained an entrenched Bill of Rights. 1971: On 19 April, by a majority of 53 to 10, the Sierra Leone Parliament passed a Republican Constitution, which replaced the position of a Governor-General with that of an Executive President. 1978: Parliament passed the one party Republican Constitution, which provided that the All Peoples Congress Party is the only recognised party in the Republic, thus making all political opposition illegal. Section 5 of that Constitution subjected the rights and liberties of all Sierra Leoneans to the rights and liberties of the then recognised party. 1991: Sierra Leone returned to multi-party democracy with the enactment of the 1 991 Constitution, which allowed individuals to form political parties. The Constitution also guaranteed a number of fundamental rights and freedoms. In March of this year the Revolutionary United Front of Sierra Leone (RUF), led by Foday Sankoh and supported by Charles Taylor, entered Sierra Leone from neighbouring Liberia and launched an armed rebellion to overthrow the one-party rule of the All Peoples Congress Party (APC), headed by retired Major-General Joseph Saidu Momoh. 1992: A military coup removed the Momoh Government and suspended the Constitution. In December of the same year 24 individuals were executed for an alleged coup attempt just 24 hours after the plot was uncovered. 1992 - 1996: The civil war deteriorated into a campaign of brutality against innocent and unarmed civilians. Thousands of men, women and children were deliberately and arbitrarily killed or had their hands, arms, limbs or other body parts amputated by the RUF. Rape and other forms of sexual violence against girls and women became widespread and systematic. The Government forces committed extra-judicial killings, torture and ill treatment of suspected 1475 .
Recommended publications
  • 1 Sierra Leone
    Sierra Leone – Researched and compiled by the Refugee Documentation Centre of Ireland on 18 March 2010 Information as to what recent wars Sierra Leone has been involved in and when they ended. In a section titled “History” the United Kingdom Foreign & Commonwealth Office country profile for Sierra Leone states: “The SLPP ruled until 1967 when the electoral victory of the opposition APC was cut short by the country's first military coup. But the military eventually handed over to the APC and its leader Siaka Stevens in 1968. He turned the country into a one -party state in 1978. He finally retired in 1985, handing over to his deputy, General Momoh. Under popular pressure, one party rule was ended in 1991, and a new constitution providing for a return to multi-party politics was approved in August of that year. Elections were scheduled for 1992. But, by this stage, Sierra Leone's institutions had collapsed, mismanagement and corruption had ruined the economy and rising youth unemployment was a serious problem. Taking advantage of the collapse, a rebel movement, the Revolutionary United Front (RUF) emerged, with backing from a warlord, Charles Taylor, in neighbouring Liberia, and in 1991 led a rebellion against the APC government. The government was unable to cope with the insurrection, and was overthrown in a junior Officers coup in April 1992. Its leader, Capt Strasser, was however unable to defeat the RUF. Indeed, the military were more often than not complicit with the rebels in violence and looting.” (United Kingdom Foreign & Commonwealth Office (25 February 2009) Country Profiles: Sub-Saharan Africa – Sierra Leone) This profile summarises the events of the period 1996 to 2002 as follows: “Strasser was deposed in January 1996 by his fellow junta leaders.
    [Show full text]
  • African Coups
    Annex 2b. Coups d’Etat in Africa, 1946-2004: Successful (1), Attempted (2), Plotted (3), and Alleged (4) Country Month Day Year Success Leaders Deaths Angola 10 27 1974 2 Antonio Navarro (inter alia) 0 Angola 5 27 1977 2 Cdr. Nito Alves, Jose van Dunen 200 Benin 10 28 1963 1 Gen. Christophe Soglo 999 Benin 11 29 1965 1 Congacou 0 Benin 12 17 1967 1 Alley 998 Benin 12 13 1969 1 de Souza 998 Benin 10 26 1972 1 Maj. Mathieu Kerekou 0 Benin 10 18 1975 2 Urbain Nicoue 0 Benin 1 16 1977 2 unspecified 8 Benin 3 26 1988 2 Capt. Hountoundji 0 Benin 5 1992 2 Pascal Tawes 0 Benin 11 15 1995 2 Col. Dankoro, Mr. Chidiac 1 Burkina Faso 1 3 1966 1 Lt. Col. Sangoule Lamizana 0 Burkina Faso 11 25 1980 1 Col. Saye Zerbo 0 Burkina Faso 11 7 1982 1 Maj. Jean-Baptiste Ouedraogo 20 Burkina Faso 8 4 1983 1 Capt. Thomas Sankara 13 Burkina Faso 10 15 1987 1 Capt. Blaise Campaore 100 Burkina Faso 10 20 2003 4 Norbert Tiendrebeogo, Capt. Wally Diapagri 0 Burundi 10 18 1965 2 unspecified 500 Burundi 11 29 1966 1 Capt. Micombero 999 Burundi 5 1972 4 unspecified 100000 Burundi 11 1 1976 1 Lt. Col. Jean-Baptiste Bagaza 0 Burundi 9 3 1987 1 Maj. Pierre Buyoya 0 Burundi 3 4 1992 2 Bagaza? 0 Burundi 7 3 1993 2 officers loyal to Buyoya 0 Burundi 10 21 1993 2 Gen. Bikomagu, Francois Ngeze 150000 Burundi 4 25 1994 2 Tutsi paratroopers 999 Burundi 7 25 1996 1 army 6000 Burundi 4 18 2001 2 Lt.
    [Show full text]
  • 5 November, 97 Ref
    ECONOMIC COMMUNITY OF WEST AFRICAN STATES COMMUNAUTE ECONOMIQUE DBS ETATS DE L'AFRIQUE DE L'OUEST ECOWAS CEDEAO HEADQUARTERS: SIEGE: 6, KING GEORGE V ROAD, 6, KING GEORGE V ROAD, P. M. B. 1 2745, LACOS (NIGERIA) P. M. B. 12745, LAGOS (NIGERIA) TELEPHONE: 2600720-9, 2600860-8, TELEPHONE: 2600720-9, 2600860-8, TELEX: 22633, 28213, 23749 ECOWAS NC. TELEX: 22633, 28213, 23749 ECOWAS NG. FAX: 26370S2, 2637675, 2600869. FAX:2637052, 2637675, 2600869. SECRETARIAT. SECRETARIAT. ECW/REL/020/LEG/139 5 November, 97 Ref. No., :.-•. 19 The Secretary-General United Nations 1 UN Plaza New York 10017 New York Dear Sir, of the ECOWAS Committee of Five Sierra Leone— -? to the United Nations Security Council I have the honour to transmit the first report of the ECOWAS Committee of Five on Sierra Leone, covering the period from 8 October to 5 November, 1997 as requested by the Security Council in paragraph 9 of Resolution 1132(1997) concerning the situation in Sierra Leone for onward transmission to the Chairman of the United Nations Security Council. ......................... ....... ------ ............ ----------- Please accept, Your Excellency, the renewed assurances of my highest consideration. Lansana Executive Secre/tary ECONOMIC COMMUNITY OF WEST AFRICAN STATES FIRST REPORT OF THE ECOWAS COMMITTEE OF FIVE ON SIERRA LEONE TO THE UNITED NATIONS SECURITY COUNCIL MADE PURSUANT TO UNITED NATIONS RESOLUTION S/RES 1132(1997) OF 8/10/97 EXECUTIVE SECRETARIAT LAGOS, INTRODUCTION 1. On 25 May, 1997. a section of the military in Sierra Leone violently overthrew the legitimate government of President Ahmad Tejan Kabbah. 2. The coup d'etat was not only notably bloody but it also resulted in very tragic consequences on all class of citizens of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Sierra Leone Assessment
    Sierra Leone, Country Information http://194.203.40.90/ppage.asp?section=...erra%20Leone%2C%20Country%20Information SIERRA LEONE ASSESSMENT April 2002 Country Information and Policy Unit I SCOPE OF DOCUMENT II GEOGRAPHY III HISTORY IV STATE STRUCTURES V HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUES VI HUMAN RIGHTS - SPECIFIC GROUPS VII HUMAN RIGHTS - OTHER ISSUES ANNEX A: CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS ANNEX B: POLITICAL ORGANISATIONS ANNEX C: PROMINENT PEOPLE REFERENCES TO SOURCE MATERIAL I. SCOPE OF DOCUMENT 1.1. This assessment has been produced by the Country Information & Policy Unit, Immigration & Nationality Directorate, Home Office, from information obtained from a variety of sources. 1.2. The assessment has been prepared for background purposes for those involved in the asylum determination process. The information it contains is not exhaustive, nor is it intended to catalogue all human rights violations. It concentrates on the issues most commonly raised in asylum claims made in the United Kingdom. 1.3. The assessment is sourced throughout. It is intended to be used by caseworkers as a signpost to the source material, which has been made available to them. The vast majority of the source material is readily available in the public domain. 1.4. It is intended to revise the assessment on a 6-monthly basis while the country remains within the top 35 asylum producing countries in the United Kingdom. 1.5. An electronic copy of the assessment has been made available to the following organisations: Amnesty International UK 1 of 43 07/11/2002 5:44 PM Sierra Leone, Country Information http://194.203.40.90/ppage.asp?section=...erra%20Leone%2C%20Country%20Information Immigration Advisory Service Immigration Appellate Authority Immigration Law Practitioners' Association Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants JUSTICE Medical Foundation for the care of Victims of Torture Refugee Council Refugee Legal Centre UN High Commissioner for Refugees 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Taylor Trial Transcript
    Case No. SCSL-2003-01-T THE PROSECUTOR OF THE SPECIAL COURT V. CHARLES GHANKAY TAYLOR THURSDAY, 4 NOVEMBER 2010 9.00 A.M. TRIAL TRIAL CHAMBER II Before the Judges: Justice Julia Sebutinde, Presiding Justice Richard Lussick Justice El Hadji Malick Sow, Alternate For Chambers: Mr Artur Appazov For the Registry: Ms Rachel Irura Mr Alhassan Fornah For the Prosecution: Ms Brenda J Hollis Mr Nicholas Koumjian Ms Kathryn Howarth Ms Maja Dimitrova For the accused Charles Ghankay Mr Terry Munyard Taylor: Mr Silas Chekera Ms Logan Hambrick Ms Kimberley Punt CHARLES TAYLOR Page 48670 4 NOVEMBER 2010 OPEN SESSION 1 Thursday, 4 November 2010 2 [Open session] 3 [The accused present] 4 [Upon commencing at 9.02 a.m.] 09:02:58 5 PRESIDING JUDGE: Good morning. We'll take appearances, 6 please. 7 MR KOUMJIAN: Good morning, Madam President. Good morning, 8 your Honours, and good morning to Defence counsel. This morning 9 for the Prosecution, Kathryn Howarth, Maja Dimitrova, an intern 09:03:24 10 with our office Jacqueline Greene, and myself, Nicholas Koumjian. 11 MR MUNYARD: Good morning, Madam President, your Honours, 12 counsel opposite. For the Defence this morning, myself, Terry 13 Munyard, Silas Chekera, Logan Hambrick and our legal assistant 14 Kimberley Punt and intern Szilvia Csevar. 09:03:54 15 PRESIDING JUDGE: Mr Witness, we're going to continue with 16 your testimony this morning and I'm required to remind you that 17 you took an oath to tell the truth and that oath is binding on 18 you today. 19 THE WITNESS: Yes.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Chronology: 1991-1997
    QUESTION AND ANSWER SERIES SIERRA LEONE POLITICAL, MILITARY, AND HUMAN RIGHTS CHRONOLOGY: 1991-1997 [QA/SLE/98.001] APRIL 1998 PRODUCED BY: INS RESOURCE INFORMATION CENTER 425 I STREET, N.W. (ULLICO BUILDING, 3RD FLOOR) WASHINGTON, D.C. 20536 DISCLAIMER The July 27, 1990 Regulations, “Aliens and Nationality: Asylum and Withholding of Deportation Procedures,” mandated the creation of a new corps of Asylum Officers to provide an initial, nonadversarial adjudication of asylum claims. Asylum Officers use asylum law, interviews with asylum applicants, and relevant information on country conditions to determine the merits of individual claims for asylum. As specified in the Regulations (8 CFR 208.12), as amended, such information may be obtained from “the Department of State, the Office of International Affairs, other Service offices, or other credible sources, such as international organizations, private voluntary agencies, news organizations, or academic institutions.” Question and Answer Series papers are one means by which information on human rights conditions in a country and/or conditions affecting given groups or individuals deemed “at risk” within a given country is presented to Asylum and Immigration Officers. Question and Answer Series papers are brief descriptions of conditions in countries based on information provided by the sources referred to above. They are prepared by expert consultants and/or the staff of the Resource Information Center, Immigration and Naturalization Service, U.S. Department of Justice. Question and Answer papers cannot be, and do not purport to be either exhaustive with regard to the country surveyed, or conclusive as to the merits of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum.
    [Show full text]
  • Sierra Leone, Country Information
    Sierra Leone, Country Information SIERRA LEONE ASSESSMENT April 2003 Country Information and Policy Unit I SCOPE OF DOCUMENT II GEOGRAPHY III ECONOMY IV HISTORY V STATE STRUCTURES VIA HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUES VIB HUMAN RIGHTS - SPECIFIC GROUPS VIC HUMAN RIGHTS - OTHER ISSUES ANNEX A: CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS ANNEX B: POLITICAL ORGANISATIONS ANNEX C: PROMINENT PEOPLE REFERENCES TO SOURCE MATERIAL 1. SCOPE OF DOCUMENT 1.1 This assessment has been produced by the Country Information and Policy Unit, Immigration and Nationality Directorate, Home Office, from information obtained from a wide variety of recognised sources. The document does not contain any Home Office opinion or policy. 1.2 The assessment has been prepared for background purposes for those involved in the asylum / human rights determination process. The information it contains is not exhaustive. It concentrates on the issues most commonly raised in asylum / human rights claims made in the United Kingdom. 1.3 The assessment is sourced throughout. It is intended to be used by caseworkers as a signpost to the source material, which has been made available to them. The vast majority of the source material is readily available in the public domain. These sources have been checked for currency, and as far as can be ascertained, remained relevant and up to date at the time the document was issued. 1.4 It is intended to revise the assessment on a six-monthly basis while the country remains within the top 35 asylum-seeker producing countries in the United Kingdom. 2. GEOGRAPHY 2.1 The Republic of Sierra Leone covers an area of 71,740 sq km (27,699 sq miles) and borders Guinea and Liberia.
    [Show full text]
  • Edible Diamonds? Exploring the Role of Fisheries As a Resource in Conflict Futures in West and Central Africa
    EDIBLE DIAMONDS? EXPLORING THE ROLE OF FISHERIES AS A RESOURCE IN CONFLICT FUTURES IN WEST AND CENTRAL AFRICA A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE DIVISION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAI‘I AT MĀNOA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICAL SCIENCE (ALTERNATIVE FUTURES) August 2020 By Anna Butchart Dissertation Committee: Jairus Grove, Chairperson Jonathan Goldberg-Hiller John Lynham Krishna Sankaran Nicole Grove Keywords: conflict, future studies, fisheries, fish, West Africa, Central Africa, Sierra Leone, São Tomé & Príncipe, resources, scarcity, environmental security. Acknowledgements Researching and writing this dissertation has been an important and challenging journey that I could not have accomplished alone. I’d like to thank the great colleagues and friends I worked with during my time on the Maritime Security desk, those I met during my field work and the people who gave their time for my interviews, your support, input and advice has been essential to completing this work. I’d also like to thank the Spark M. Matsunaga Institute for Peace and Conflict Resolution for awarding me the Nabumoto Tanahashi Peace Graduate Fellowship in 2019. My Committee, particularly Jairus and Jon for helping me navigate some stormy waters and for valuable support and input. And of course, my family and friends who are always there for me, particularly my Mum for her essential proof reading and encouragement during our Covid-lockdown, and Dr. Katrina who has been my cheerleader and guide throughout this whole journey. Thank you all. i Abstract There is much scholarship examining the role of resources in causing, prolonging or preventing conflict.
    [Show full text]
  • Sierra Leone: the Perpetual Struggle for Security
    Sierra Leone: the Perpetual Struggle for Security Between 1991 and 2002, the Sierra Leone civil war left approximately 70,000 people dead, hundreds of thousands mutilated and displaced over half of the population of five million.1 This tragedy is a result of various factors that became intertwined. The country’s “historical, cultural, sociological and political milieu” combined with the complexities of natural resources and economic issues all “contributed to and fueled the conflict.”2 The aim of this research is to investigate the severity of events and violent acts along with how society functions today that can provide pertinent information on Sierra Leone’s stability and what threats to security may currently exist or are likely to occur. Analyzing such a historical event and its aftermath provides crucial information on what is lacking in peace efforts and the significant gaps in programs that hinder developing and maintaining stability in countries that have experienced conflict. The atrocities committed during the civil war are infamous to Sierra Leone. A decade of violence that included drug-induced children who “hacked off the limbs of thousands of civilians, including women and babies,”3 has left a psychological imprint on a nation. Sierra Leone’s civil war and its aftermath can be held as a prime example when attempting to predict probable outcomes and possible solutions in similar conflicts. Examining the situation in post-conflict Sierra Leone can assess the effectiveness of its DDR (disarmament, demobilization and reintegration) program and what issues have remained persistent that can be properly addressed in current and future dilemmas, such as the marginalization of girls.
    [Show full text]
  • Sierra Leone, the Quest for Face Critical Challenges As They Embark on the Complex Tasks of Reconciliation, Peace and the Rebuilding of War-Torn Societies
    The Quest for Sustainable POST-CONFLICT AFRICAN STATES such as Sierra Leone, The Quest for face critical challenges as they embark on the complex tasks of reconciliation, peace and the rebuilding of war-torn societies. Conflict transformation ultimately depends on the Sustainable Development democratisation of society, in ways that promote equitable inclusiveness in the political process, social justice and the promotion of citizenship rights. and Peace This collection of three essays explores the significance of Democracy, Development and Peace Sierra Leone’s 2007 elections in the light of the quest of the people for a democracy that is responsive to social demands, welfare and popular aspirations. It provides first- hand information and analysis of the struggles of the Sierra Leonean citizens to overcome the legacy of a traumatic past, by using their vote to sanction bad governance, and choose a path to a good life and sustainable democracy as the most viable guarantee for peace and development. CONTRIBUTIONS BY Fantu Cheru, The Nordic African Institute Osman Gbla, University of Sierra Leone The 2007 A.B. Zack-Williams, University of Central Lancashire Zubairu Wai, York University Sierra Leone Elections Edited by A.B. Zack-Williams ISBN 978-91-7106-619-0 Nordiska Afrikainstitutet With a Foreword by Fantu Cheru The Nordic Africa Institute P.O. Box 1703 SE-751 47 Uppsala, Sweden www.nai.uu.se P O L IC Y DI AL O G UE N O . 2 THE NORDIC AFRIC A In S T I T U T E The Nordic Africa Institute (Nordiska Afrikainstitutet) is a center for research, documentation and information on modern Africa in the Nordic region.
    [Show full text]
  • Mono 118.Indd
    iv LIST OF TABLES, FIGURES AND MAPS TABLE 1 Sierra Leone poverty lines FIGURE 1 Sierra Leone national poverty headcount TABLE 2 Sierra Leone diamond export data TABLE 3 Liberia DDRR statistics MAP 1 West Africa MAP 2 Liberia MAP 3 Sierra Leone v GLOSSARY AND ABBREVIATIONS AFRC – Armed Forces Revolutionary Council, a militia split from the Sierra Leone Army that staged a coup in 1997 and allied with the RUF. APC – All People’s Congress, Sierra Leone political party. CBO – Community-based organisation DDR – Disarmament, Demobilisation, and Reintegration De Beers – The largest diamond mining and selling company in the world. ECOMOG – The ECOWAS Cease-fire Monitoring Group. ECOWAS – The Economic Community of West African States. EO – Executive Outcomes, a South African private military company dissolved in 1999 under South Africa’s anti-mercenary laws. IDMP – Integrated Diamond Management and Policy, a USAID-funded programme to implement new policy on the diamond trade. IMP – Integrated Management Programme, a programme of the IDMP and PDA to empower diamond diggers in Sierra Leone in cooperatives that will monitor their diamonds from “Earth to Export.” Juju – An object used as a fetish, a charm, or an amulet in West Africa, and the supernatural power ascribed to such an object. The Kamajors in Sierra Leone believed that the use of juju, including following strict behavioral codes, kept them safe from attack by their enemies. Kamajors – Mende hunter-warriors who fought the RUF in Sierra Leone under the leadership of Sam Hinga Norman. vi Local catalysts, global reactions: Cycles of conflict in the Mano River Basin KPCS – Kimberley Process Certification Scheme – A process for stopping the flow of rough diamonds from conflict areas.
    [Show full text]
  • A Vision for Sierra Leone
    Transcript A Vision for Sierra Leone Rtd. Brig. Julius Maada Bio SLPP Presidential Nominee for the 2012 Elections Chair: Alex Vines Research Director, Area Studies and International Law; and Head of Africa Programme, Chatham House 10 May 2012 The views expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of Chatham House, its staff, associates or Council. Chatham House is independent and owes no allegiance to any government or to any political body. It does not take institutional positions on policy issues. This document is issued on the understanding that if any extract is used, the author(s)/ speaker(s) and Chatham House should be credited, preferably with the date of the publication or details of the event. Where this document refers to or reports statements made by speakers at an event every effort has been made to provide a fair representation of their views and opinions, but the ultimate responsibility for accuracy lies with this document’s author(s). The published text of speeches and presentations may differ from delivery. Transcript: A Vision for Sierra Leone Rtd. Brig. Julius Maada Bio: Please permit me on behalf of my Party, the Sierra Leone People’s Party (SLPP), to first and foremost thank the United Kingdom (UK) Government for its continued support to Sierra Leone and for helping my country through our numerous difficulties, including support to re-establish peace after a devastating war and for our post-war reconstruction. I would also like to say that there I am very aware many of you would like to ask questions.
    [Show full text]