Walleye Pollock and Its Utilization and Trade

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Walleye Pollock and Its Utilization and Trade Foreign Fishery Developments ther subdivide stocks into local groups; details regarding the structure of each stock or local subgroup have not been investigated and analyzed in detail. Some fishery biologists believe that the Walleye Pollock and Its biomass of all these pollock stocks ex­ ceeds that of any other demersal species. Utilization and Trade Much of the walleye pollock fishery is conducted by bottom trawling, al­ though gillnetting, longlining, and mid­ water trawling are also used in the fishery. The length of a mature walleye Introduction Ocean from the Sea of Japan, the Ok­ pollock is between 30 and 60 cm and hotsk and Bering seas, the Gulf of Alas­ the weight of an individual averages be­ The annual harvest of walleye pol­ ka, and extend into waters off British tween 0.2 and 1.4 kg. Walleye pollock lock, Theragra chalcogramma, also Columbia. Although fishery biologists is harvested throughout the North Pacif­ called Alaska pollock, currently repre­ are uncertain about walleye pollock ic wherever stocks are found, but in re­ sents the world's largest single-species stock identification, it is generally ac­ cent years greater harvesting efforts have fishery; catches were between 5 and 6 cepted that there is a likely amount of been made in specific fishing areas (Fig. percent of the total world fisheries migratory mixing among neighboring 1). About 75 percent of walleye pollock harvest in 1984 and amounted to a stocks in certain areas of the North harvests are made in the eastern North record high 6.0 million metric tons (t). Pacific-especially in the Sea of Japan. Pacific; the other 25 percent are made Although walleye pollock is found A study made in 19]7 suggested that west of long. 175°W, primarily in U.S. throughout the North Pacific, stocks are there are at least 12 major pollock stocks waters. Although the flesh of walleye centered principally within the exclusive in the entire North Pacific. Four of these pollock is most commonly utilized for economic zones of the United States and stocks are located in the Sea of Japan human consumption, stocks are often the Soviet Union. In addition, there are at: 1) Western Hokkaido; 2) northern adversely affected by parasites in many several pollock stocks located in the Sea Japan (Honshu); 3) western Japan (Hon­ fishing regions. In this event, harvests of Japan. Four countries (the Soviet shu); and 4) Primorskiy-Korean penin­ are often used for fishmeal. Union, Japan, the United States, and the sula. North of Hokkaido there are two Ever since the 1m El Nino phenom­ Republic of Korea (ROK» harvest over more pollock stocks at: 5) Kuril Islands enon decimated the Peruvian anchovy 95 percent of the world walleye pollock and 6) east and southern Hokkaido. In fishery, walleye pollock has been the catch. About one-fourth of this total the Sea of Okhotsk, there are two stocks world's largest single-species fishery. catch has been harvested within U.S. identified as the: 7) Sakhalin-Hokkaido Despite this fact, the pollock fishery is waters in recent years. and 8) northern Okhotsk stocks. Mov­ remarkably little known to the general Walleye pollock is marketed through­ ing east from the Sea of Okhotsk, American public, considering that a out the world in various forms and the observers note the 9) Kamchatka penin­ large segment of it occurs within the potential for expanded uses of this sula stock. 200-mile fisheries zone of the United groundfish species is great. The most The three remaining pollock stocks States. The reason for the lack of infor­ interesting commodity produced from are found around North America in: 10) mation probably stems from the fact that pollock is surimi, a minced product The eastern Bering Sea; ll) the Gulf of the fishery is only about 20 years old which is used to manufacture such prod­ Alaska; and, finally, 12) waters around around Alaska and did not involve U.S. ucts as imitation crab legs, scallops, British Columbia. It should be noted commercial fishery participation until shrimps, and other analog foodstuffs. that within these stocks observers report recently. Worldwide pollock surimi production differing genetic characteristics that fur­ Historically, the North Pacific fishery exceeded 400,000 t in 1984 and ex­ periments are being conducted on other marine species to test their commercial viability for surimi production. Walleye Pollock Harvests Pollock stocks occur throughout the eastern and western North Pacific This news article was written by George Herrfurth of the Office of International Fisheries, ational Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, Washington, DC 20235. Walleye pollock, Theragra chalcogramma 49(1), 1987 61 U.S.S.R. U.S.A. OCEAN PACI FIC Walleye pollock distribution • Major walleye pollock fishing grounds Figure I.-Distribution and major fishing grounds for walleye pollock. for walleye pollock was limited to the Table 1.-World walleye pollock catch, by country, 1975-84.' coastal waters of Japan and Korea until Catch (1.000 t) the late 1950's, when it underwent a Country 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984' rapid expansion as a distant-water fish­ USSR. 1.958.1 2.090.9 1.975.1 2.011.9 2.048.8 2,111.7 2.137.9 2,497.9 2.747.0 3,449.6 ery. Japanese operations, in particular, Japan 2.677.4 2,445.4 1.927.6 1.546.1 1.551.1 1,552.4 1,595.3 1,570.4 1,434.4 1.605.9 spread quickly up into the Sea of Ok­ United States neg!. 0.2 0.3 1.8 3.1 1.4 60.7 130.4 284.5 455.1 S. Korea (ROK) 387.8 532.6 390.6 361.9 297.2 286.2 278.6 262.1 367.4 398.6 hotsk and across into the Bering Sea Poland 0.5 neg!. 1.4 1.2 40.4 61.0 92.9 0.4 53.7 during the 1960's. The Japanese harvest Germany (FRG) 6.0 10.3 16.1 23.7 24.4 1.3 of walleye pollock in the Bering Sea in­ Canada 0.9 2.4 3.4 2.2 1.1 0.9 1.0 0.7 creased from 25,800 t in 1960 to over Total' 5,023.9 5,070.4 4.295.9 3,925.3 3,944.0 4,020.8 4,176.8 4,478.2 5,047.3 5,986.0 655,800 t in 1969. At the same time, 'Sources: FAG "Yearbook of Fishery Statistics, various years; NMFS "Fisheries of the United States, 1984" pollock fishing efforts elsewhere in the North Pacific, particularly by Soviet fishermen, also expanded. During the 1960's, annual pollock harvests in­ potential for increased harvests depends 200-mile zones of the United States and creased from 465,000 t in 1961, to nearly upon the size of the walleye pollock the Soviet Union, vessels from Japan, 3.6 million tons by 1971. biomass, which is not known with any China, Korea (ROK), and other coun­ The annual world catch of walleye certainty by biologists. tries, have reportedly concentrated fish­ pollock was about 5.0 million tons in In an interesting development to the ing efforts there in recent months to 1975 (Table 1). Following the establish­ North Pacific pollock fishery, surveys offset restrictions made by either the ment of 200-mile fishery zones in the carried out by Japanese research vessels United States or the Soviet Union in North Pacific in 1977, the catch de­ have indicated that substantial schools their respective fishery zones. creased by over 20 percent. After 1980, of large adult-sized Alaska pollock in­ when Japan and Korea secured catch habit the surface and midwater layers of Soviet Union allocations within U.S. waters and the the 3,000-4,000 m deep Aleutian basin The Soviet Union currently maintains Soviet Union increased fishing efforts in the central Bering Sea. Observers the world's largest walleye pollock fish­ within their own waters, catches again believe that these fish are associated ery (Fig. 2), and harvests annually ac­ increased. Harvests exceeded 6.0 mil­ with stocks in the area and are not an count for about one-fourth of the total lion tin 1984, or about 20 percent more isolated population. Because a large part Soviet fisheries catch. Soviet fishermen than the catches made in 1975. The of the area in question lies outside the caught a record-high 3.4 million t in 62 Marine Fisheries Review 1984, accounting for 55 percent of the ~ world's pollock harvest. Soviet catches 3.500 have increased steadily since 1978 be­ cause of expanded fishing efforts within domestic waters. Estimates on the bio­ mass of the four pollock stocks located ~::t~ ~"'~ __..:u:;:;;.s;;..s;o.R_.__... within the Soviet 200-mile zone are un­ ,=[ _ available, and observers are not sure ~ . __~Ja~p~an~ _ whether Soviet stocks can withstand an­ ~ 1,500 - nual harvests of over 3.0 million t on a .Q" ~ sustained basis. 1.000 The Soviet Government, under terms of a bilateral treaty with Japan, permits 500 Japanese fishermen to harvest pollock Rep. of Korea ........ ···\is·~ Other within the Soviet 200-mile zone. Annual o ----,--.-r-,-==r,==;::,:::-;:;;~·::;:·r·":------:S;;;i~~T'~~~=:;- pollock quotas for Japanese fishermen 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 in the Soviet waters decreased from 290,000 to 250,000 t between 1980 and 1985, and decreased further in 1986, Figure 2.-World walleye pollock catch, 1975-84. after the Soviet-Japanese annual agree­ ment resulted in a quota of only 150,000 t of pollock for Japanese fishermen.
Recommended publications
  • Climate Change and Fisheries: Policy, Trade and Sustainable Nal of Fisheries Management 22:852-862
    Climate Change and Alaska Fisheries TERRY JOHNSON Alaska Sea Grant University of Alaska Fairbanks 2016 ISBN 978-1-56612-187-3 http://doi.org/10.4027/ccaf.2016 MAB-67 $10.00 Credits Alaska Sea Grant is supported by the US Department of Commerce, NOAA National Sea Grant, grant NA14OAR4170079 (A/152-32) and by the University of Alaska Fairbanks with state funds. Sea Grant is a partnership with public and private sectors combining research, education, and extension. This national network of universities meets changing environmental and Alaska Sea Grant economic needs of people in coastal, ocean, and Great Lakes University of Alaska Fairbanks regions. Fairbanks, Alaska 99775-5040 Funding for this project was provided by the Alaska Center for Climate Assessment and Policy (ACCAP). Cover photo by (888) 789-0090 Deborah Mercy. alaskaseagrant.org TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract .................................................................................................... 2 Take-home messages ...................................................................... 2 Introduction............................................................................................. 3 1. Ocean temperature and circulation ................................................ 4 2. Ocean acidification ............................................................................ 9 3. Invasive species, harmful algal blooms, and disease-causing pathogens .................................................... 12 4. Fisheries effects—groundfish and crab ......................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wholesale Market Profiles for Alaska Groundfish and Crab Fisheries
    JANUARY 2020 Wholesale Market Profiles for Alaska Groundfish and FisheriesCrab Wholesale Market Profiles for Alaska Groundfish and Crab Fisheries JANUARY 2020 JANUARY Prepared by: McDowell Group Authors and Contributions: From NOAA-NMFS’ Alaska Fisheries Science Center: Ben Fissel (PI, project oversight, project design, and editor), Brian Garber-Yonts (editor). From McDowell Group, Inc.: Jim Calvin (project oversight and editor), Dan Lesh (lead author/ analyst), Garrett Evridge (author/analyst) , Joe Jacobson (author/analyst), Paul Strickler (author/analyst). From Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission: Bob Ryznar (project oversight and sub-contractor management), Jean Lee (data compilation and analysis) This report was produced and funded by the NOAA-NMFS’ Alaska Fisheries Science Center. Funding was awarded through a competitive contract to the Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission and McDowell Group, Inc. The analysis was conducted during the winter of 2018 and spring of 2019, based primarily on 2017 harvest and market data. A final review by staff from NOAA-NMFS’ Alaska Fisheries Science Center was completed in June 2019 and the document was finalized in March 2016. Data throughout the report was compiled in November 2018. Revisions to source data after this time may not be reflect in this report. Typically, revisions to economic fisheries data are not substantial and data presented here accurately reflects the trends in the analyzed markets. For data sourced from NMFS and AKFIN the reader should refer to the Economic Status Report of the Groundfish Fisheries Off Alaska, 2017 (https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/resource/data/2017-economic-status-groundfish-fisheries-alaska) and Economic Status Report of the BSAI King and Tanner Crab Fisheries Off Alaska, 2018 (https://www.fisheries.noaa.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 3 FISH and CRUSTACEANS, MOLLUSCS and OTHER AQUATIC INVERTEBRATES I 3-L Note
    )&f1y3X CHAPTER 3 FISH AND CRUSTACEANS, MOLLUSCS AND OTHER AQUATIC INVERTEBRATES I 3-l Note 1. This chapter does not cover: (a) Marine mammals (heading 0106) or meat thereof (heading 0208 or 0210); (b) Fish (including livers and roes thereof) or crustaceans, molluscs or other aquatic invertebrates, dead and unfit or unsuitable for human consumption by reason of either their species or their condition (chapter 5); flours, meals or pellets of fish or of crustaceans, molluscs or other aquatic invertebrates, unfit for human consumption (heading 2301); or (c) Caviar or caviar substitutes prepared from fish eggs (heading 1604). 2. In this chapter the term "pellets" means products which have been agglomerated either directly by compression or by the addition of a small quantity of binder. Additional U.S. Note 1. Certain fish, crustaceans, molluscs and other aquatic invertebrates are provided for in chapter 98. )&f2y3X I 3-2 0301 Live fish: 0301.10.00 00 Ornamental fish............................... X....... Free Free Other live fish: 0301.91.00 00 Trout (Salmo trutta, Salmo gairdneri, Salmo clarki, Salmo aguabonita, Salmo gilae)................................... X....... Free Free 0301.92.00 00 Eels (Anguilla spp.)..................... kg...... Free Free 0301.93.00 00 Carp..................................... X....... Free Free 0301.99.00 00 Other.................................... X....... Free Free 0302 Fish, fresh or chilled, excluding fish fillets and other fish meat of heading 0304: Salmonidae, excluding livers and roes: 0302.11.00 Trout (Salmo trutta, Salmo gairdneri, Salmo clarki, Salmo aguabonita, Salmo gilae)................................... ........ Free 2.2¢/kg 10 Rainbow trout (Salmo gairnderi), farmed.............................. kg 90 Other............................... kg 0302.12.00 Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.), Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and Danube salmon (Hucho hucho).............
    [Show full text]
  • Portraits with Pollock
    FOREWORD The Department of the Interior's Bureau of Commercial Fisheries and th e dom es­ tic fishing industry, especiall y that part of the industry lo cated in New England, recommend pollock, an excellent sea food- nutritious, flavorful and sati s fying­ a delicious substitute for haddock. Pollock is available in great numbers in the co ld waters of the North Atlantic but is a relatively unused food resource. They are more difficult to catch th an haddock, but haddock have experienced spawning failures during the past 5 years. The famous Georges Bank haddock populations are extremely low. The United States and 13 other nations and their fishing fleets are cooperating in a program to rehabilitate the haddock resource. International annual catch quotas have been imposed and fishing for haddock in certain areas is prohibited during the spawnin g season. This program will continue at least through 1972. With little or no h addock on the market, fishing efforts are now co ncentrated on pollock, a close relative of both the haddock and cod. Try pollock us in g you r own favorite recipe, or the Bureau of Commercial Fisheries tested and approved "0;"' ;0 <h;. ,obl;"I;,o, @~ H. ~I Charles H. Meacham Commissioner for Fi sh and Wildlife The Bureau of Commercial Fishefles of the U.S. Department of the Interior proudly presents a new showing of Portraits with PollocK. In an unusual series of still lifes, the Bureau portrays this versatile fish in an exciting array of seafood spectaculars for today's busy homemaker. By using classic techniques of the masters, the Bureau has captured all the rich flavor and imagination of American pollock in this special collector's edition.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollachius Virens
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Published October 5 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Use of rocky intertidal habitats by juvenile pollock Pollachius virens Robert W. Rangeley*, Donald L. Kramer Department of Biology, McGill University, 1205 Docteur Penfield Avenue, Montreal, Quebec, Canada H3A 1B1 ABSTRACT: We ~nvestigatedpatterns of distribution and foraging by young-of-the-year pollock Pol- lachius virens in the rocky intertidal zone. Pollock were sampled by beach seine in fucoid macroalgae and in open habitats at all stages of the tide, day and night throughout the summer. Their presence in shallow water at the high tidal stages indicated that at least part of the pollock population migrated across the full width of the intertidal zone (150 m) each tide. Densities in shallow water were much higher at low than at high tidal stages suggesting that a large influx of pollock moved in from the sub- tidal zone at low tidal stages and then dispersed into intertidal habitats at high tidal stages. There were few differences in pollock densit~esbetween algal and open habitats but abundances likely increased in the algal habitat at higher tidal stages when changes in habitat availability are taken Into account. Densities were higher at night and there was an order of magnitude decline in pollock densities from early to late summer. In another study we showed that piscivorous birds are a probable cause of pollock summer mortality. Pollock fed on invertebrates from intertidal algae relatively continuously. The tidal migrations of juvenile pollock observed in this study and their use of macroalgae as a foraging and possibly a refuging habitat strongly suggests that the rocky intertidal zone may be an important fish nursery area.
    [Show full text]
  • Pollock Or Cod: Can the Difference Be Told?
    Fishery Notes versa. The tasters were asked to identify the two like samples and then give their preference of either the like pair or the odd sample. Tasters marked their re­ sults on score sheets which were re­ Pollock or Cod: Can turned for tabulation (Fig. 1). To avoid the Difference Be Told? chance selection of the odd sample, samples were served in the order shown in Table 4, thus lowering to one-third The pollock, Pollachius virens, is a ethnic ongln. The tests were con­ the probability of chance selection of good source of protein which can often ducted, and the samples prepared, by the odd sample. be processed and prepared in recipes students of the Institute's Food Science The results ofthe 2-day test are given that call for Atlantic cod, Gadus and Nutrition Program. Fish used for in Table 5. More than 60 percent of the morhua, or haddock, Melanogrammus the taste tests were donated by a com­ tasters failed to identify the like sam­ aeglefinus. The pollock is similar in mercial fish processor in the form of ples of Fishwich and Fishcake, and flavor, odor, and texture to both cod and frozen fish fillet blocks. Recipe samples nearly half of the tasters failed to iden­ haddock, yet is not a popular catch were prepared as in Table 3 for Glouces­ tify the like samples of Gloucester Sea among coastal water fishermen who ter Sea Puffs, Fishwiches, and Puffs. About 50 percent of those tasters often equate it with poor quality and Fishcakes. who correctly identified the like pairs throw it back.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Register/Vol. 85, No. 123/Thursday, June 25, 2020/Rules
    Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 123 / Thursday, June 25, 2020 / Rules and Regulations 38093 that make the area biologically unique. and contrary to the public interest to DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE It provides important juvenile swordfish provide prior notice of, and an habitat, and is essentially a narrow opportunity for public comment on, this National Oceanic and Atmospheric migratory corridor containing high action for the following reasons: Administration concentrations of swordfish located in Based on recent data for the first semi- close proximity to high concentrations 50 CFR Part 679 annual quota period, NMFS has of people who may fish for them. Public [Docket No. 200604–0152] comment on Amendment 8, including determined that landings have been from the Florida Fish and Wildlife very low through April 30, 2020 (21.9 RIN 0648–BJ35 Conservation Commission, indicated percent of 1,318.8 mt dw quota). concern about the resultant high Adjustment of the retention limits needs Fisheries of the Exclusive Economic potential for the improper rapid growth to be effective on July 1, 2020; otherwise Zone Off Alaska; Modifying Seasonal of a commercial fishery, increased lower, default retention limits will Allocations of Pollock and Pacific Cod catches of undersized swordfish, the apply. Delaying this action for prior for Trawl Catcher Vessels in the potential for larger numbers of notice and public comment would Central and Western Gulf of Alaska fishermen in the area, and the potential unnecessarily limit opportunities to AGENCY: National Marine Fisheries for crowding of fishermen, which could harvest available directed swordfish Service (NMFS), National Oceanic and lead to gear and user conflicts.
    [Show full text]
  • Tilapia Aquaculture Exceeds Salmon in 2009 Farmed Tilapia Farmed Salmon 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500
    Tilapia: The aquatic chicken and its role leading the aquaculture industry Kevin Fitzsimmons, Ph.D. University of Arizona, Professor of Environmental Science World Aquaculture Society, Past-President Aquaculture without Frontiers, Past-Chairman American Tilapia Association, Sec. Tres. June 2010 Tilapia Model for how aquaculture industry should develop Global demand, variety of production systems and geographic regions, some vertically integrated Environmentally sustainable – “Green Aquaculture” (no fish meal required in the diet, no antibiotics, many farms use effluents for crops) Honduras Malaysia United States World Tilapia Production of Costa Rica 3,078,443 mt in 2009 Saudi Arabia Vietnam Ecuador Others Cuba Colombia Bangladesh Indonesia China Brasil Taiwan Thailand Mexico Egypt Philippines Global production of tilapia production Global Aquaculture Fishery 3,500,000 3,000,000 2,500,000 2,000,000 1,500,000 Metric tons Metric 1,000,000 500,000 0 1986 1988 1998 2008 1984 1990 1992 1994 1996 2000 2002 2004 2006 2010(est) Global tilapia aquaculture exceeds salmon in 2009 Farmed Tilapia Farmed Salmon 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 Metric (000) tons Metric 1,000 500 0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2007 2008 2009 2006 2010(est) Tilapia (May 25, 2005 Madrid Daily) Europe is following US trend of adopting tilapia as replacement for traditional fishes Tilapia (June 2007, Tesco, UK) $8 US per lb whole fish!!!! Top Ten Seafoods (U.S.) per capita (lbs) 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Tuna 3.5 Shrimp 3.4 Shrimp 3.7 Shrimp 4.0 Shrimp 4.2 Shrimp
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study in France Saithe Fillets
    CASE STUDY SAITHE FILLETS IN FRANCE PRICE STRUCTURE IN THE SUPPLY CHAIN SEPTEMBER 2018 WWW.EUMOFA.EU Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Contents SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................................... 1 0 TASK REMINDER – SCOPE AND CONTENT ........................................................................... 2 0.1 CASE STUDY SCOPE ........................................................................................................................ 2 0.2 CONTENT OF THE DOCUMENT ........................................................................................................ 2 1 DESCRIPTION OF THE PRODUCT ............................................................................................ 3 1.1 BIOLOGICAL AND COMMERCIAL CHARACTERISTICS ..................................................................... 3 1.2 PRODUCTION AND AVAILABILITY OF SAITHE ................................................................................ 4 2 STRUCTURE OF THE EU MARKET .......................................................................................... 7 2.1 EU MARKET FOR SAITHE ................................................................................................................ 7 Apparent market by Member State ......................................................................................... 7 Imports ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Pollock Pollachius Virens
    Atlantic Pollock Pollachius virens Description: Atlantic Pollock is a whitefish that resembles Cod. They NUTRITIONAL are members of the same family, except Pollock doesn’t INFORMATION have a barbel (whisker). Pollock range from olive green Per 3.5 ounce portion to brownish green dorsally and pale grey to yellow Calories 92 on its belly. Atlantic Pollock is found on both sides Saturated Fst 0.14 g Total Fat 0.98 g of the Atlantic. On the East Coast, it is sourced from Protein 19 g Newfoundland to New Jersey. Pollock has previously Sodium 86 mg been largely consumed as a versatile alternative to Cod Cholesterol 71 mg and Haddock. Eating Qualities: COOKING METHODS Pollock has a light flaky white flesh that can be Poach substituted for Cod or Haddock in most recipes. The Bake fish is very mild (although stronger than Cod), and Broil lean with a large flake. Atlantic Pollock is very low Fry in saturated fat and is a very good source of protein, Grill vitamin B12, phosphorus, and selenium. Sauté Fishing Methods: HANDLING Pollock are caught by a variety of gears but most Whole fish should be packed in commonly by bottom trawls and gillnets. Pollock are flaked ice. Whole fish and fillets well managed throughout their, range and there is little should be stored in a drain pan bycatch associated with Pollock fisheries. in the coldest part of the walk-in. Fillets should also be covered in ice although with a barrier, so the ice never touches the flesh. Fortune Fish & Gourmet Chicago Office: Minneapolis Office: (630) 860-7100 (612) 724-5911 (888) 803-2345 (866) 363-6063 www.fortunefishco.net.
    [Show full text]
  • Wasted Catch: Unsolved Problems in U.S. Fisheries
    © Brian Skerry WASTED CATCH: UNSOLVED PROBLEMS IN U.S. FISHERIES Authors: Amanda Keledjian, Gib Brogan, Beth Lowell, Jon Warrenchuk, Ben Enticknap, Geoff Shester, Michael Hirshfield and Dominique Cano-Stocco CORRECTION: This report referenced a bycatch rate of 40% as determined by Davies et al. 2009, however that calculation used a broader definition of bycatch than is standard. According to bycatch as defined in this report and elsewhere, the most recent analyses show a rate of approximately 10% (Zeller et al. 2017; FAO 2018). © Brian Skerry ACCORDING TO SOME ESTIMATES, GLOBAL BYCATCH MAY AMOUNT TO 40 PERCENT OF THE WORLD’S CATCH, TOTALING 63 BILLION POUNDS PER YEAR CORRECTION: This report referenced a bycatch rate of 40% as determined by Davies et al. 2009, however that calculation used a broader definition of bycatch than is standard. According to bycatch as defined in this report and elsewhere, the most recent analyses show a rate of approximately 10% (Zeller et al. 2017; FAO 2018). CONTENTS 05 Executive Summary 06 Quick Facts 06 What Is Bycatch? 08 Bycatch Is An Undocumented Problem 10 Bycatch Occurs Every Day In The U.S. 15 Notable Progress, But No Solution 26 Nine Dirty Fisheries 37 National Policies To Minimize Bycatch 39 Recommendations 39 Conclusion 40 Oceana Reducing Bycatch: A Timeline 42 References ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The authors would like to thank Jennifer Hueting and In-House Creative for graphic design and the following individuals for their contributions during the development and review of this report: Eric Bilsky, Dustin Cranor, Mike LeVine, Susan Murray, Jackie Savitz, Amelia Vorpahl, Sara Young and Beckie Zisser.
    [Show full text]
  • FAO Fisheries & Aquaculture
    Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Fisheries and for a world without hunger Aquaculture Department Species Fact Sheets Pollachius virens (Linnaeus, 1758) Pollachius virens: (click for more) Synonyms Gadus carbonarius Linnaeus, 1758 Gadus colinus Lacépède, 1800 FAO Names En - Saithe(=Pollock), Fr - Lieu noir, Sp - Carbonero(=Colín). 3Alpha Code: POK Taxonomic Code: 1480401501 Scientific Name with Original Description Gadus virens Linnaeus, 1758, Syst.Nat., ed. 10:254. Diagnostic Features A small barbel at tip of lower jaw. Lateral line smooth along its entire length. Colour: brownish-green dorsally, only slightly paler ventrally; fins coloured like the body, except for pelvics which are pale; lateral line pale. Geographical Distribution FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Department Launch the Aquatic Species Distribution map viewer Barents Sea and Spitsbergen to Bay of Biscay, around Iceland, southwest Greenland, and in the western Atlantic from Hudson Strait to North Carolina, although rare at the extremes of the range. Habitat and Biology An active, gregarious, pelagic fishoccurring in inshore and offshore waters to about 200 m depth.Migrations are known to occur, especially for spawning, to coastal waters in spring and to deeper waters in winter. Also, long-distance north-south migrations are known, both for Europe and America. During their first 2-3 years of age, saithe remain in shallow coastal waters.Growth is rapid: at 1 year, ca. 20 cm, 2 years, 35 cm, 3 years, 50 cm, 5 years, 60-65 cm, 10 years, 94-97 cm, 15 years, 108 cm. Maximum age is 25 years. European saithe grow faster in the southern part of their range, but it is not known whether this also applies to the North American population.
    [Show full text]