Trends in Thumb Carpometacarpal Interposition Arthroplasty in the United States, 2005–2011
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
An Original Study Trends in Thumb Carpometacarpal Interposition Arthroplasty in the United States, 2005–2011 Brian C. Werner, MD, Andrew B. Bridgforth, MD, F. Winston Gwathmey, MD, and A. Rashard Dacus, MD ligament reconstruction and tendon interposition (LRTI).4-20 Abstract The authors of a recent systematic review concluded there is We conducted a study to investigate current trends no evidence that any one surgical procedure for CMC-OA is in carpometacarpal (CMC) interposition arthroplasty superior to another in terms of pain, function, satisfaction, across time, sex, age, and region of the United States; range of motion, or strength.4 Nevertheless, a recent survey per-patient charges and reimbursements; and the as- found that 719 (62%) of 1156 US hand surgeons used LRTI as sociation between this procedure and concomitantly the treatment of choice for advanced CMC-OA.21 performed carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and carpal Our detailed literature search yielded no other database tunnel release (CTR). studies characterizing current trends in the practice patterns Patients who underwent CMC interposition arthro- of US orthopedic surgeons who perform interposition arthro- plasty (N = 41,171) were identified in a national data- plasty for CMC arthritis. Analysis of these trends is important base. Between 2005 and 2011, the number of patients not only to patients but also to the broader orthopedic and who had CMC interposition arthroplasty increased health care community.22 46.2%. Females had the procedure more frequently We conducted a study to investigate current trends in CMC than males at all time points, though theAJO percentage interposition arthroplasty across time, sex, age, and region of of patients who were male increased throughout the the United States; per-patient charges and reimbursements; study period. Of the patients who had CMC interposi- and the association between this procedure and concomitantly tion arthroplasty, 40.9% also had a diagnosis of CTS. performed carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and carpal tunnel Between 15.5% and 17.3% of these patients had CTR release (CTR). In addition, we compared incidence of CMC performed concomitantly. interposition arthroplasty with that of CMC arthrodesis. Despite a lack of evidence that thumb CMC inter- DOposition arthroplasty is superior NOT to other surgical treat- Patients COPY and Methods ment options, the number of patients who are having All data were derived from the PearlDiver Patient Records Data- this procedure has increased significantly. The impetus base (PearlDiver Technologies), a publicly available database of for these trends requires additional investigation. patients. The database stores procedure volumes, demograph- ics, and average charge information for patients with International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) diagnoses and proce- dures or Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes. Data for the common entity, osteoarthritis (OA) at the base of the present study were drawn from the Medicare database within thumb is largely caused by the unique anatomy and the PearlDiver records, which has a total of 179,094,296 patient Abiomechanics of the thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) records covering the period 2005–2011. This study did not re- joint.1 Radiographically evident CMC degeneration occurs in quire institutional review board approval, as it used existing, 40% of women and 25% of men over age 75 years, making the publicly available data without identifiers linked to subjects. thumb CMC joint the most common site of surgical reconstruc- PearlDiver Technologies granted us database access for tion for upper extremity OA.2,3 academic research. The database was stored on a password- Over the past 40 years, numerous surgical techniques for protected server maintained by PearlDiver. ICD-9 and CPT codes managing thumb CMC-OA have been described. These include can be searched in isolation or in combination. Search results volar ligament reconstruction, first metacarpal osteotomy, yield number of patients with a searched code (or combina- CMC arthrodesis, CMC joint replacement, and trapeziectomy. tion of codes) in each year, age group, or region of the United Trapeziectomy can be performed in isolation or in combina- States, as well as mean charge and mean reimbursement for tion with tendon interposition, ligament reconstruction, or the code or combination of codes. Authors’ Disclosure Statement: The authors report no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article. www.amjorthopedics.com August 2015 The American Journal of Orthopedics® 363 Trends in Thumb Carpometacarpal Interposition Arthroplasty B. C. Werner et al We used CPT code 25447 (arthroplasty, interposition, inter- Throughout this period, females underwent CMC interposi- carpal, or CMC joints) to search the database for patients who tion arthroplasty more frequently than males at all time points underwent thumb CMC interposition arthroplasty. Although (P < .0001). Overall ratio of female to male patients, however, this code does not specify thumb, we are unaware of any pro- changed significantly. In 2005, 18.1% of all CMC interposition cedure (other than thumb CMC interposition arthroplasty) arthroplasties were performed on male patients; this increased typically given this code. Our search yielded procedure vol- to 23.9% of all procedures by 2011 (P < .0001) (Figure 2). Table umes, sex distribution, age distribution, region volumes, and 1 presents an age-group analysis. There were no significant mean per-patient charges and reimbursements for each CPT differences in relative percentage of patients in any given age code. We then searched the resulting cohort for CTS (ICD-9 group who underwent CMC interposition arthroplasty over code 354.0), endoscopic CTR (CPT code 29848), and open CTR the study period. (CPT code 64721) to find CTR performed concomitantly with Analysis of overall procedure incidence by region revealed CMC interposition arthroplasty. Last, patients were tracked significant increases in all regions P( < .0001), ranging from in the database past their surgery date to evaluate for postop- 18.5% (West) to 54.5% (Northeast) (Figure 3). At all time erative physical or occupational therapy evaluations within points, the incidence of CMC interposition arthroplasty was 6 months (using CPT codes appearing in at least 1% of the significantly lower in the Northeast than in any other region cohort: 97001, 97003, 97004, 97110, 97112, 97124, 97140, and compared with the overall average. 97150, 97350, 97535) and postoperative thumb, hand, or wrist Between 2005 and 2011, there were significant increases radiographs within 6 months (using CPT codes appearing in in both per-patient charges and reimbursements for CMC in- at least 1% of the cohort: 73140, 73130, 73110). To ensure terposition arthroplasty (Figure 4). Mean per-patient charge adequacy of 6-month postoperative data, we included in this increased from $2676 in 2005 to $4181 in 2011 (P < .0001), portion of the study only those patients with surgery dates and mean per-patient reimbursement increased from $1445 in between 2005 and 2010. 2005 to $2061 in 2011 (P < .0001). The discrepancy between For comparative purposes, we also searched the database for charge and reimbursement increased throughout the study patients who underwent thumb CMC arthrodesis within the period: Reimbursement in 2005 was 54.0% of the charge; this same period—using CPT codes 26841 and 26842 (arthrodesis decreased to 49.3% by 2011 but was not statistically significant CMC joint thumb, with or without internal fixation; with or (P = .08). without autograft) and CPT code 26820 (fusionAJO in opposition, Overall, 40.9% of patients who underwent CMC interpo- thumb, with autogenous graft). sition arthroplasty also had a CTS diagnosis. Between 15.5% Overall procedure volume data are reported as number of and 17.3% of these patients had concomitant open or endo- patients with the given CPT code in the database output in a scopic CTR at time of CMC interposition arthroplasty (Table given year. Age-group and sex analyses are reported as number 2). Percentage of patients who underwent concomitant CTR of patients reported in the database output and as percentage did not change significantly from 2005 to 2011 P( = .139). of patients who underwent the CPT code of interest that year. Use of postoperative occupational and/or physical therapy MeanDO charges and reimbursements NOT are reported as results by increased significantlyCOPY over the study period, from 33.5% of the database for the code of interest (CPT 25447). Data for the patients in 2005 to 50.7% of patients in 2010 (P < .0001). Use region analysis are presented as an incidence, as there is an of postoperative thumb, hand, and/or wrist radiography also uneven distribution of patient volumes among regions. This increased throughout the study period, from 7.4% of patients incidence is calculated as number of patients in a particular in 2005 to 18.7% of patients in 2010 (P < .0001). region and year normalized to total number of patients in the We identified 1916 unique patients who underwent thumb database for that particular region or year. Regions are defined CMC arthrodesis between 2005 and 2011. Over the 7-year as Midwest (IA, IL, IN, KS, MI, MN, MO, ND, NE, OH, SD, study period, there was a 19.1% decrease in number of patients WI), Northeast (CT, MA, ME, NH, NJ, NY, PA, RI, VT), South who underwent CMC arthrodesis, from 309 in 2005 to 250 (AL, AR, DC, DE, FL, GA, KY, LA, MD, MS, NC, OK, SC, TN, in 2011 (P < .0001) (Figure 5). Significantly fewer patients TX, VA, WV), and West (AK, AZ, CA, CO, HI, ID, MT, NM, had CMC arthrodesis compared with CMC interposition ar- NV, OR, UT, WA, WY). throplasty at all time points, ranging from 6.5% (thumb CMC Chi-squared linear-by-linear association analysis was used arthrodesis:CMC interposition arthroplasty) in 2005 to 3.6% to determine statistical significance with regard to trends over in 2011 (P < .0001). time in procedure volumes, sex, age group, and region.