DOCSLIB.ORG

Intra-UK Allocations Review

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Intra-UK Allocations Review Intra-UK Allocations Review September 2019 1 Contents Intra-UK Allocations Review ................................................................................... 1 Foreword ................................................................................................................... 4 Executive summary .................................................................................................. 6 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 6 The 2013 decision ................................................................................................... 6 Recommendation .................................................................................................... 7 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 9 1.1 About the review ............................................................................................... 9 1.2 How the review was carried out ........................................................................ 9 1.3 Governance of the review ............................................................................... 10 2. Farming in the UK today .................................................................................... 11 2.1 The Common Agricultural Policy ..................................................................... 11 2.2 Leaving the CAP ............................................................................................. 12 2.3 Farming across the UK ................................................................................... 12 Farming in Scotland ........................................................................................ 16 Farming in Wales ............................................................................................ 17 Farming in Northern Ireland ............................................................................ 18 2.4 Future support for farming ............................................................................... 22 3. Why do we have convergence funding? .......................................................... 25 3.1 The CAP budget ............................................................................................. 25 3.2 2003 CAP reform ............................................................................................ 26 3.3 2013 European Commission review ............................................................... 27 3.4 2013 Intra-UK allocation of convergence funding ........................................... 29 3.5 Convergence funding beyond 2020 ................................................................ 30 4. Overarching considerations .............................................................................. 33 4.1 Fairness, reasonableness and sustainability ................................................... 33 4.2 The concept of convergence ........................................................................... 34 4.3 A convergence funding formula ...................................................................... 35 4.4 The UK government’s funding commitments .................................................. 35 4.5 Uncertainty ...................................................................................................... 36 5. What did we find? ............................................................................................... 37 5.1 Responses by consultation question ............................................................... 37 2 5.2 Engagement with the UK government and devolved administrations ............. 49 5.3 Engagement with agricultural economists ....................................................... 54 5.4 Key themes ..................................................................................................... 54 5.5 Factors ............................................................................................................ 55 5.6 Summary of stakeholder engagement ............................................................ 57 6. What did we consider? ...................................................................................... 59 6.1 What are the options? ..................................................................................... 59 6.2 Funding methodologies ................................................................................... 61 6.3 Factors ............................................................................................................ 62 6.4 Conclusion ...................................................................................................... 68 7. What should be done? ....................................................................................... 70 7.1 Recommendations .......................................................................................... 70 7.2 Wider observations ......................................................................................... 72 Annexes .................................................................................................................. 75 [1]: Terms of reference .......................................................................................... 76 [2]: The size of the convergence pot ..................................................................... 78 [3] Payments per hectare methodology ................................................................ 79 [4] The Scottish perspective .................................................................................. 83 [5] The Welsh perspective .................................................................................... 93 [6] The perspective from Northern Ireland ............................................................ 97 [7] The English perspective ................................................................................. 101 [8] Letter from Lord Bew to the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs on the Intra-UK Allocations Review.......................................................... 102 [9] Letter from the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs to Lord Bew about the Intra-UK Allocations Review ................................................ 104 [10] Letter from Lord Bew to Phil Hogan, the European Commissioner, about the Intra-UK Allocations Review................................................................................ 107 [11] Letter from Phil Hogan, the European Commissioner, to Lord Bew about the Intra-UK Allocations Review................................................................................ 109 [12] Stakeholder engagement documentation..................................................... 112 [13] List of stakeholders who have submitted evidence to the review ................. 119 [14] Glossary Definition ..................................................................................... 121 [15] Abbreviations ............................................................................................... 123 3 Foreword We were asked specifically by the Secretary of State to focus on fairness across the four regions of the UK. It is clear that a desire to reinforce the stability of the UK was part of the underlying rationale for the review. Fairness in this context, we were to learn, is a notoriously subjective concept. We made every effort to ensure that our research was evidence-based. In particular we opened a dialogue with the European Commission and the Cabinet Office, as well as the devolved administrations. We are grateful for the support of devolved administration officials in assisting us with our enquiries. Our objective was to find out as much as we could about the controversial decision in 2013 with respect to convergence funding. We are publishing this report after 7 months of investigation; consultation with over 50 industry, academic, NGO and devolved administration representatives; and deliberations over our conclusions. While we did not receive all the material we asked for, we did receive a very substantial amount of documentation. We have also backed this up with a new layer of statistical evidence. We have been able to agree on factors by which the allocation of the notional ‘convergence’ pot for 2020-22 should be determined, in a way that recognises the historical concern of Scottish farmers and the Scottish Government, based on the EU’s own approach to external convergence. But we are not going to be able fulfil the instruction to recommend a fair solution and to remain within the condition in our terms of reference for our recommendations to be fiscally neutral, because we cannot tolerate a reduction of funding to farmers in any part of the UK. Our recommendation addresses the long-standing concern of those in Scotland that an injustice had been done and, according to the analysis we commissioned, would see a modest increase for Welsh farmers, recognising that they also have not been major beneficiaries from the convergence windfall since 2014. Assuming our request is met, farmers in England and Northern Ireland would see no change. We considered carefully the option of maintaining current allocations, which would have avoided a request for some additional funding. But we are conscious of the need to find a solution that creates a foundation for a sustainable post-2022 funding settlement, without a continuing perceived injustice undermining
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Democracy, Sovereignty and Unionist Political Thought During the Revolutionary Period in Ireland, C
    This is a repository copy of Democracy, Sovereignty and Unionist Political Thought during the Revolutionary Period in Ireland, c. 1912-1922. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/118211/ Version: Accepted Version Article: Reid, C.W. orcid.org/0000-0001-6252-6321 (2017) Democracy, Sovereignty and Unionist Political Thought during the Revolutionary Period in Ireland, c. 1912-1922. Transactions of the Royal Historical Society, 27. pp. 211-232. ISSN 0080-4401 https://doi.org/10.1017/S008044011700010X This article has been published in a revised form in Transactions of the Royal Historical Society [https://doi.org/10.1017/S008044011700010X]. This version is free to view and download for private research and study only. Not for re-distribution, re-sale or use in derivative works. © Royal Historical Society 2017. Reuse This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND) licence. This licence only allows you to download this work and share it with others as long as you credit the authors, but you can’t change the article in any way or use it commercially. More information and the full terms of the licence here: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ DEMOCRACY, SOVEREIGNTY AND UNIONIST POLITICAL THOUGHT DURING THE REVOLUTIONARY PERIOD IN IRELAND, c.
    [Show full text]
  • Adrian Jahna Adrian Jahna Is from Avon Park and Works As a Sales Representative for BASF in the Southern Half of the State
    WEDGWORTH LEADERSHIP INSTITUTE for Agriculture & Natural Resources newsletter• Director’s Dialogue- p.1-3 classX • Welcome to Swaziland...-p. 4-7 • Dam Sugar Cane- p. 8-11 Seminar XI • Swaziland Goodbyes...- p. 12-14 • Dairy, Sheep, & Berries So Sweet- p. 15-19 In This Issue: • Dancing Nights in Scotland Away- p. 20-23 • Cup of Joe with Dr. Joe Joyce- p. 24-25 • Coordinator’s Corner- p. 26-27 Reflect.Let’s Director’s Dialogue -Dr. Hannah Carter, Program Director “But if not for Wedgworth...” This is a familiar phrase that I love to have people complete who have been through the program. They finish the sentence with friendships they’ve formed, places they visited, experiences they would have never had or mind changing moments that altered their path. If you are reading this and have been through the program, how would you finish “But if not for Wedgworth…”? I am going to alter this though for the sake of sharing my experiences around our international seminar. “But if not for Dr. Eugene Trotter and Dr. Pete Hildebrand…” this class would not have had the most incredible international seminar—it was truly amazing for so many 1 different reasons—but it all leads back to these to issues around land and generational agriculture. two gentlemen who served as pioneers in their Through our relationship with Scotland’s equivalent respective fields and mentors to two “Yankee” grad of the Wedgworth program, we were able to visit students who found themselves at the University of the farms and enterprises of several Scottish Florida at the same time.
    [Show full text]
  • Citizens' Forums, and Attitudes to Agriculture
    CITIZENS’ FORUMS, AND ATTITUDES TO AGRICULTURE, ENVIRONMENT AND RURAL PRIORITIES RESEARCH REPORT BY MARK DIFFLEY CONSULTANCY AND RESEARCH AND INVOLVE 1 Citizens’ Forums and Attitudes to Agriculture, Environment and Rural Priorities June 2019 AUTHORS: Mark Diffley, Sanah Saeed Zubairi (Mark Diffley Consultancy and Research), Kaela Scott, Andreas Pavlou (Involve) 2 Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................ 5 Background and methodology ............................................................................... 5 Key findings and points of consideration ............................................................... 5 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 11 Background and aims .......................................................................................... 12 Methodology ........................................................................................................ 14 Quantitative data .............................................................................................. 15 Qualitative data ................................................................................................ 16 Principles................................................................................................................ 18 High quality food production............................................................................ 19 Perceptions of the value of
    [Show full text]
  • Land Economy and Environment Research Group, Scottish Agricultural College (SAC), UK [email protected]
    DISTRIBUTION OF BEEF CATTLE IN SCOTLAND: HOW IMPORTANT IS AGRICULTURAL POLICY? ALAN RENWICK, CESAR REVOREDO-GIHA, STEVEN THOMSON, PHILIP LEAT AND SIAN RINGROSE Land Economy and Environment Research Group, Scottish Agricultural College (SAC), UK [email protected] Paper prepared for presentation at the 114th EAAE Seminar ‘Structural Change in Agriculture’, Berlin, Germany, April 15 - 16, 2010 Copyright 2010 by Alan Renwick, Cesar Revoredo-Giha, Steven Thomson, Philip Leat and Sian Ringrose. All rights reserved. Readers may make verbatim copies of this document for non-commercial purposes by any means, provided that this copyright notice appears on all such copies. 1 Distribution of Beef Cattle in Scotland: How Important is Agricultural Policy? Alan Renwick, Cesar Revoredo-Giha, Steven Thomson, Philip Leat and Sian Ringrose1 Land Economy and Environment Research Group, Scottish Agricultural College (SAC), UK Abstract If one observe aggregated cattle figures for Scotland for more than a century it is possible to perceive that that cattle numbers seem to react strongly to agricultural policy (e.g., livestock subsidies before 1973, UK becoming part to the European Community). The purpose the paper is to provide a regional view of this result, namely whether the same trend can be observed if the analysis is done by Scottish regions. For this purpose, we assembled a panel dataset for 11 Scottish regions for the period 1959 until 2008. We specialised the analysis on beef cattle. We use simple regression techniques to verify whether there have been changes in the regional shares of beef cattle and whether beef cattle numbers in the different regions tend to converge to a steady state value.
    [Show full text]
  • Irish Political Studies the Art and Effect of Political Lying in Northern Ireland
    This article was downloaded by: [The Library at Queen's University] On: 06 May 2015, At: 09:02 Publisher: Routledge Informa Ltd Registered in England and Wales Registered Number: 1072954 Registered office: Mortimer House, 37-41 Mortimer Street, London W1T 3JH, UK Irish Political Studies Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.tandfonline.com/loi/fips20 The Art and Effect of Political Lying in Northern Ireland Arthur Aughey Published online: 08 Sep 2010. To cite this article: Arthur Aughey (2002) The Art and Effect of Political Lying in Northern Ireland, Irish Political Studies, 17:2, 1-16, DOI: 10.1080/714003199 To link to this article: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/714003199 PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE Taylor & Francis makes every effort to ensure the accuracy of all the information (the “Content”) contained in the publications on our platform. However, Taylor & Francis, our agents, and our licensors make no representations or warranties whatsoever as to the accuracy, completeness, or suitability for any purpose of the Content. Any opinions and views expressed in this publication are the opinions and views of the authors, and are not the views of or endorsed by Taylor & Francis. The accuracy of the Content should not be relied upon and should be independently verified with primary sources of information. Taylor and Francis shall not be liable for any losses, actions, claims, proceedings, demands, costs, expenses, damages, and other liabilities whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with, in relation to or arising out of the use of the Content.
    [Show full text]
  • And Agricultural Writings of the Rev Dr John Walker (I73 I-I8o3) by CHARLES W J WITHERS
    A Neglected Scottish Agriculturalist: the 'Georgical Lectures' and Agricultural Writings of the Rev Dr John Walker (I73 I-I8o3) By CHARLES W J WITHERS HE eighteenth century witnessed important and prestigious Highland and many changes in Scottish agricul- Agricultural Society, founded in I784, T ture. Several related components of epitomize the close links between insti- change may be identified. New ways of tutionalized scientific enterprise and the managing and working the land -- for development of Scotland's rural economy example, the more widespread adoption of in this period. ~- enclosure and use of lime, and changing Published works on agriculture likewise practices of rotation ~ occurred alongside mirrored the widespread interest in the a variety of shifts in Scottish rural society local and national improvement of the involving such things as the passing of the land. Books and pamphlets outlining the 'fermtoun' and the move from single to established methods of husbandry or multiple tenancies. These changes were urging the adoption of new practices and paralleled by, and were, in part, the result better principles had appeared before I7oo, of the active involvement of forward- but it was in the eighteenth century in thinking 'improving' landowners and particular, and in concert with these other farmers. These themes occurred together elements, that changes in rural society and with an increase in the number of scientific, on the land were increasingly reflected in predominantly agricultural, 'improve- papers in societies' transactions and in ment' societies, and a growth in the published books. 3 literature on Scotland's agriculture and Important as these trends are, any ap- rural economy.
    [Show full text]
  • The Henry Jackson Society and the Degeneration of British
    Tom Griffin Hilary Aked David Miller Sarah Marusek THE HENRY JACKSON SOCIETY AND THE DEGENERATION JUNE 2015 OF BRITISH NEOCONSERVATISM: LIBERAL INTERVENTIONISM, ISLAMOPHOBIA AND THE ‘WAR ON TERROR’ Sponsored by: ISBN 978-0-9570274-4-2 AUTHOR PROFILES David Miller is Professor of Sociology in the Department of Social and Policy Sciences at the University of Bath. He is an RCUK Global Uncertainties Leader- ship Fellow (2013-15) conducting Tom Griffin is a freelance writer and a project to examine the construc- researcher and a doctoral candidate tion, use and impact of expertise on at the University of Bath. He is a ‘terrorism’. He has written widely on contributing editor of OpenDemoc- propaganda, spin and lobbying and racy’s OurKingdom blog and writes for was co-founder of Public Interest Investigations a non profit Spinwatch. He is a former executive company of which Spinwatch and Powerbase are projects. editor and political correspondent of Recent publications include: A Century of Spin: How Public the Irish World. Relations Became the Cutting Edge of Corporate Power (Pluto Press, 2008, co-author); Neoliberal Scotland (Cam- bridge Scholars, 2010, co-editor); Critical Terrorism Studies Dr Sarah Marusek is a freelance since 11 September 2001. What has been learned? (Rout- researcher and writer. She has a PhD in ledge, 2014, co-editor). Researching the Powerful: Public social science from the Maxwell School Sociology in Action (Routledge, forthcoming, co-editor). of Syracuse University. Her doctoral research focused on Islamic activism in Lebanon and was funded by the gener- Hilary Aked is a freelance researcher ous support of the Mellon Foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Scotland's Rural College Use Or Delight? History of Conflicting Hill
    Scotland's Rural College Use or delight? History of conflicting hill land uses in Scotland - a review Morgan-Davies, C; Wilson, R; Waterhouse, A Published in: Scottish Geographical Journal DOI: 10.1080/14702541.2014.994671 First published: 01/01/2015 Document Version Peer reviewed version Link to publication Citation for pulished version (APA): Morgan-Davies, C., Wilson, R., & Waterhouse, A. (2015). Use or delight? History of conflicting hill land uses in Scotland - a review. Scottish Geographical Journal, 131(2), 98 - 122. https://doi.org/10.1080/14702541.2014.994671 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Download date: 19. Oct. 2019 USE OR DELIGHT? HISTORY OF CONFLICTING HILL LAND USES IN SCOTLAND – A REVIEW Scottish Geographical Journal Corresponding author: Dr Claire MORGAN-DAVIES SRUC
    [Show full text]
  • The Circulation of Scottish Agricultural Books During the Eighteenth Century
    AGHR54_1.qxd 10/05/2006 16:13 Page 45 The circulation of Scottish agricultural books during the eighteenth century by Heather Holmes Abstract This paper focuses on aspects of the circulation of Scottish agricultural books in the eighteenth century to 1790. In viewing the books as an object of material culture, it considers a range of factors which affected their circulation: the progress of agricultural development, the rise of the Scottish book trades (and the demand for books), the methods that were available to publish books, the ability to read, the cost of books and their reputation. It concludes with a survey of the subscribers to a selection of agri- cultural books. These show that the range of people who purchased and read agricultural books widened, especially between the 1760s and 1790s. Agriculture, it might be thought, is a practical business. Much agricultural knowledge though has been book learning; and there has been much interest from the pioneering accounts of George Fussell onwards in the role of print in spreading innovation and good practice. Although a number of agricultural historians have provided comprehensive surveys of the contents of eighteenth-century Scottish agricultural books, and the surveys of James E. Handley have become classic accounts, few scholars have examined the circulation of these books.1 J. A. Symon, Alex McCallum and Charles W. J. Withers refer to a range of channels available to disseminate agricultural information and record a number of the more important agricultural books.2 For English books, Nicholas Goddard discusses aspects of the circulation and readership of books in a survey of the period 1750 to 1850.3 Other authors have suggested their influence.
    [Show full text]
  • Money and Nationalist Politics in Nineteenth Century Ireland: from O’Connell to Parnell
    MONEY AND NATIONALIST POLITICS IN NINETEENTH CENTURY IRELAND: FROM O’CONNELL TO PARNELL by MICHAEL J. KEYES THESIS FOR THE DEGREE OF PHD DEPARTMENT OF HISTORY NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF IRELAND MAYNOOTH Supervisor of Research: Professor R.V. Comerford April 2009 CONTENTS: Page Acknowledgements iii List of abbreviations iv Introduction v Part One: I. The political significance of the Catholic Rent, 1824-9 1 II. Testimonial, Tribute and ‘Justice for Ireland’, 1830-40 52 III. Agitation anew and the Repeal Rent, 1841-7 95 Part Two: IV. The rise of Parnell and the emergence of nationalist 157 cohesion, 1879-82 V. Parnell and the political machine, 1883-6 205 VI. Land agitation, expense and division, 1886-91 254 Conclusion 292 Bibliography 331 ii Acknowledgements The completion of this thesis could not have happened without the support and assistance of a great many people. Foremost of these is my supervisor, Professor R. V. Comerford. His deftness of touch on the tiller kept the vessel on course when it might otherwise have ended up on the rocks. His kindness, wisdom and encouragement sustained me throughout, and I am eternally grateful to him for his assistance in bringing the project safely to harbour. More practical support came in the form of a three year research scholarship which I was lucky enough to have been awarded by the Irish Research Council for the Humanities and Social Sciences. I wish to express my gratitude to the council for providing me with means to devote myself to fulltime research and my thanks also go to another council, my employer, South Dublin County Council, who were generous enough to grant me leave of absence for the duration of my research.
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture in Scotland Note
    DIRECTORATE GENERAL FOR INTERNAL POLICIES POLICY DEPARTMENT B: STRUCTURAL AND COHESION POLICIES AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT AGRICULTURE IN SCOTLAND NOTE Content: This note is a supporting document for the members of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development of the European Parliament providing some information on the Scottish Agriculture on the occasion of a delegation to Scotland (25-27/2/ 2009). It is consisted by: I. An introductory section setting out the main historical, geographical and demographic information, II. Some economic and trade data, and III. An in-depth analysis of the agricultural sector in terms of both production and structures. IP/B/AGRI/NT/2009_01 PE 408.969 This document was requested by the European Parliament's Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development. AUTHOR Mrs Ekaterini STAVRIDI Policy Department Structural and Cohesion Policies European Parliament B-1047 Brussels E-mail: [email protected]] LINGUISTIC VERSIONS Original: EN ABOUT THE EDITOR To contact the Policy Department or to subscribe to its monthly newsletter please write to: [email protected] Manuscript completed in January 2009. Brussels, © European Parliament, 2009. This document is available on the Internet at: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/activities/expert/eStudies.do?language=EN DISCLAIMER The opinions expressed in this document are the sole responsibility of the author and do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Parliament. Reproduction and translation for non-commercial purposes are authorized, provided the source is acknowledged and the publisher is given prior notice and sent a copy. Agriculture in Scotland ____________________________________________________________________________________________ CONTENTS ACRONYMS 4 1. INTRODUCTION 7 1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Applying the Concept of Sustainable Intensification to Scottish Agriculture
    Applying the concept of sustainable intensification to Scottish Agriculture Barnes, A.P. and Poole, C.E.Z. Land Economy Research Group, SAC, Edinburgh, UK Contributed Paper prepared for presentation at the 86th Annual Conference of the Agricultural Economics Society, University of Warwick, United Kingdom 16 - 18 April 2012 Copyright 2012 by Barnes and Poole. All rights reserved. Readers may make verbatim copies of this document for non-commercial purposes by any means, provided that this copyright notice appears on all such copies. Abstract: A number of influential policy circles have championed the concept of sustainable intensification (SI) as a technology to meet the challenge of a growing population. Various definitions exist for sustainable intensification, but the concept is driven by future constraints on land use. Most of the work directed at SI has been focused on developing countries, where the imperative for output increases are paramount. Fewer studies have applied the concept to developed economies. This paper examines this concept for Scotland, which is experiencing falls in productivity and has a complex policy arena based on quality rather than quantity improvements. We develop a schema for understanding the concept of sustainable intensification which we argue must develop beyond the provision of eco-systems services and encompass social as well as economic and ethical parameters. We apply these concepts and apply data from the Farm Account Survey for a balanced panel of 42 beef farms within Scotland over the period 2000-2010. A principal components analysis was applied to these data to provide a basis for understanding weighting structures within the various dimensions of sustainability and we find five main components, one of which strongly represents the intensivity but under- represents other sustainability factors.
    [Show full text]