DOCSLIB.ORG

Basic Stability – Guide 2… Calculations Home Page

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Home Page Basic Stability – Guide 2… Calculations Loadline Displacement G-Transverse G- Longitudinal Free Surface & Loll Guide 2 – Stability Calculations This guide will cover the following… • Loadline, Fresh Water Allowance • Dock Water Allowance • Draft, Mean Draft, Trim • Displacement and Block Coefficient • Hydrostatic Tables, TPC • Movement of G in the transverse plane • Movement of G in the longitudinal plane • Free Surface and Loll Guide 3 (the third and final guide in this series) The next guide will cover stability calculations using MV Twosuch , an excerpt from a ship’s stability booklet that will be used for examination purposes. by Stevehdc 1 Basic Stability – Guide 2… Calculations Loadline Displacement G-Transverse G- Longitudinal Free Surface & Loll Loadlines Loadlines from a Ship Stability perspective often involve calculations to determine how much to sink the summer loadline in dock water so that the vessel will be on her Top of F summer marks when entering salt water. Fresh Water Allowance (FWA) Top of S Assume a vessel loaded in Fresh Water of RD 1.0 so that the water level is at the TOP of the F load line. If the vessel was then placed into Salt Water of RD 1.025 the vessel would float with the water level at the TOP of the S loadline due to the density of the water changing. FWA Fresh Water Allowance can be found in the ship’s stability manual. 2 Basic Stability – Guide 2… Calculations Loadline Displacement G-Transverse G- Longitudinal Free Surface & Loll Dock Water Allowance ( DWA ) Calculation The number of millimetres by which the Summer Load Line can be submerged in Dock Water so that the vessel will be at its Summer Load Line when the vessel To determine the DWA enters Salt Water (density 1025 kg/m³) (ퟏퟎퟐퟓ − 풅풐풄풌 풘풂풕풆풓 풅풆풏풔풊풕풚) Dock Water Allowance ( DWA ) - Calculation 푫푾푨 = 푭푾푨 × A calculation is required to determine how much you can (ퟏퟎퟐퟓ − ퟏퟎퟎퟎ) sink your Summer load line below the water at a river berth, so you can be on your Summer Load Line when entering the (ퟏퟎퟐퟓ − 풅풐풄풌 풘풂풕풆풓 풅풆풏풔풊풕풚) 푫푾푨 = 푭푾푨 × ocean (ퟐퟓ) FWA units millimetres DWA units millimetres Orals Question A common Orals question is Calculation of DWA The following examples will assist you in becoming competent with this important calculation 3 Basic Stability – Guide 2… Calculations Loadline Displacement G-Transverse G- Longitudinal Free Surface & Loll Dock Water Allowance - Calculation A vessel is loading cargo in Dock Water density 1012kg/m³, if the vessel has a FWA of 160 mm, how much can the Summer Load Dock Water Allowance - Calculation Line be submerged in Dock Water, so that the vessel will float at her Summer Marks on entering Salt Water? (density 1025 kg/m³) (ퟏퟎퟐퟓ − 풅풐풄풌 풘풂풕풆풓 풅풆풏풔풊풕풚) 푫푾푨 = 푭푾푨 × Try the following examples to check your ability to carry out (ퟏퟎퟐퟓ − ퟏퟎퟎퟎ) this important calculation. (ퟏퟎퟐퟓ − ퟏퟎퟏퟐ) 푫푾푨 = ퟏퟔퟎ × Question FWA Density (ퟐퟓ) mm kg/m³ 푫푾푨 = ퟖퟑ. ퟐ 풎풎 1 150 1016 2 120 1006 3 110 1018 4 110 1012 Answers shown on next page … 4 Basic Stability – Guide 2… Calculations Loadline Displacement G-Transverse G- Longitudinal Free Surface & Loll Dock Water Allowance - Calculation Dock Water Allowance - Calculation (ퟏퟎퟐퟓ − ퟏퟎퟏퟔ) 푫푾푨 = ퟏퟓퟎ × (ퟐퟓ) 1 Question FWA Density 푫푾푨 = ퟓퟒ 풎풎 mm kg/m³ (ퟏퟎퟐퟓ − ퟏퟎퟎퟔ) 푫푾푨 = ퟏퟐퟎ × 1 150 1016 (ퟐퟓ) 2 2 120 1006 푫푾푨 = ퟗퟏ. ퟐ 풎풎 3 110 1018 (ퟏퟎퟐퟓ − ퟏퟎퟏퟖ) 푫푾푨 = ퟏퟏퟎ × 4 110 1012 3 (ퟐퟓ) 푫푾푨 = ퟑퟎ. ퟖ 풎풎 (ퟏퟎퟐퟓ − ퟏퟎퟏퟐ) 푫푾푨 = ퟏퟏퟎ × 4 (ퟐퟓ) 푫푾푨 = ퟓퟕ. ퟐ풎풎 5 Basic Stability – Guide 2… Calculations Loadline Displacement G-Transverse G- Longitudinal Free Surface & Loll Displacement The total weight of the vessel and everything on board that Draft Marks … how to read vessel. (Often abbreviated to 'W‘.) (assume the blue lines represent Q. How can we determine the displacement of a vessel? the water level) A. By observing the draft. 1.30 metres Draft Sometimes written as "Draught" The measurement of "how deep 1.20 metres the vessel sits in the water" This is measured at specific points of the vessel...eg. the forward draft or after draft. Mean Draft 10cm The mean draft is the arithmetical mean of the fore and aft drafts. 2 That is the fore and aft drafts added together and divided by 2. 1.10 metres 10cm Trim The difference in draft readings between the forward draft 1M 10cm marks and the after draft marks. 1 metre 6 Basic Stability – Guide 2… Calculations Loadline Displacement G-Transverse G- Longitudinal Free Surface & Loll Trim (by head or stern) Mean Draft and Trim If the forward reading is larger, the vessel is considered to be trimmed by the head. Consider a vessel with the following drafts: If the after reading is larger, the vessel is considered to Fwd draft = 3.60m be trimmed by the stern. Aft draft = 3.80m Find mean draft and the trim of the vessel Calculations for mean draft and trim are commonplace on board ship 푓푤푑 푑푟푎푓푡 + 푎푓푡 푑푟푎푓푡 푚푒푎푛 푑푟푎푓푡 = 2 Hydrostatic Table 3.60 + 3.80 This table is found in the Stability manual on 푚푒푎푛 푑푟푎푓푡 = 2 board the vessel. The table lists variables used in the calculation 풎풆풂풏 풅풓풂풇풕 = ퟑ. ퟕퟎ풎 of stability. On smaller vessels, the mean draft is calculated 푇푟푖푚 = 푎푓푡 푑푟푎푓푡 ~푓푤푑 푑푟푎푓푡 and used to enter the hydrostatic table. 푇푟푖푚 = 3.80~3.60 Displacement and other variables can then be 푻풓풊풎 = ퟎ. ퟐퟎ풎 풃풚 풕풉풆 풔풕풆풓풏 determined by inspection. On larger vessels a further calculation to convert mean draft to draft at the LCF is required. 7 Basic Stability – Guide 2… Calculations Loadline Displacement G-Transverse G- Longitudinal Free Surface & Loll Hydrostatic Table (extract from stability booklet M.V. Twosuch) Hydrostatic Displacement TPC MCT 1 cm LCF KM Draft (m) (tonnes) (t-m) (m aft 0) (m) 2.60 156.5 1.168 1.438 -1.072 3.94 2.65 162.5 1.172 1.465 -1.065 3.91 2.70 168.0 1.180 1.480 -1.060 3.89 2.75 174.0 1.185 1.500 -1.050 3.87 If the table is entered with a mean draft of 2.60m the values associated with this draft can be viewed … our Displacement would be 156.5 tonnes and all the other values in the table in this row would be valid for this draft. If the vessel had a draft of 2.75m the Displacement would be 174.0 tonnes. If the vessel had a displacement of 168 tonnes, the mean draft would be 2.70 metres. 8 Basic Stability – Guide 2… Calculations Loadline Displacement G-Transverse G- Longitudinal Free Surface & Loll TPC Tonnes per centimetre immersion, the amount of weight in Calculation using TPC tonnes required to change the draft of the vessel by 1 cm Vessel can submerge the Summer If a vessel is box shaped, it would have the same TPC value Load Line by 83.2 mm or 8.3cm. irrespective of its draft. How much cargo can be loaded if the vessel has a TPC value of 8? Ships vary in shape as their draft changes and consequently the TPC will vary as the draft changes. Look at how the Hydrostatic table shows change of TPC value with change in draft. 퐴푚표푢푛푡 푡표 푙표푎푑 = 푠푖푛푘푎푔푒 × 푇푃퐶 퐴푚표푢푛푡 푡표 푙표푎푑 = 8.3 × 8 Up to now we have determined the change in draft measured in mm or cm. By using TPC we can convert a change in draft to an amount 푨풎풐풖풏풕 풕풐 풍풐풂풅 = ퟔퟔ. ퟒ 풕풐풏풏풆풔 of weight in tonnes. 9 Basic Stability – Guide 2… Calculations Loadline Displacement G-Transverse G- Longitudinal Free Surface & Loll KG Height of the centre of gravity of the ship above the baseline, weight referred to as KG. (from the keel ‘K’ to the centre of gravity ‘G’) Vessel with Movement of G – Load and discharge weight on The height of G will change as weights are loaded or deck discharged. It is important for the person in charge of G monitoring the stability of the vessel, to know how G will move in all cases. The basic principles of movement of G are as follows: G moves towards the loaded weight Weight is discharged G moves away from the discharged weight G G moves away from the discharged weight 10 Basic Stability – Guide 2… Calculations Loadline Displacement G-Transverse G- Longitudinal Free Surface & Loll Movement of G - a weight already on board Assume the weight is already on board and is shifted on deck weight Vessel with weight on deck The height of G will not change as the weight height will not change G Movement of G in this case: weight G moves parallel to the shifted weight Weight is shifted G G moves parallel to the shifted weight 11 Basic Stability – Guide 2… Calculations Loadline Displacement G-Transverse G- Longitudinal Free Surface & Loll Movement of G - Lifting a Weight When a weight is lifted by a crane or derrick, the The weight is weight is considered to act at the head of the crane or considered to derrick. Subsequent lifting or lowering of the hoist act at the head wire will not change the position of the vertical centre of gravity of the weight. of the crane weight This is an important consideration as the centre of gravity of the vessel, “G “ will now rise a considerable amount as the weight is initially lifted and remain at that height until the crane or G moves G2 derrick head is lowered. towards the head of the crane when G1 the weight is lifted clear of the deck 12 Basic Stability – Guide 2… Calculations Loadline Displacement G-Transverse G- Longitudinal Free Surface & Loll G moves towards the loaded weight Calculation – Vertical Shift of G In order to calculate the shift of G from its original A weight of 10 tonnes is loaded on the position to its new position the following formula is used: centre line.
Recommended publications
  • Inclining Test and Lightweight Survey V2.1

    Inclining Test and Lightweight Survey V2.1

    GL Leaflet for Inclining test and Lightweight survey V2.1 Leaflet for Inclining test and Lightweight Survey Version 2.1 dated 2011-08-24 1 GL Leaflet for Inclining test and Lightweight survey V2.1 Version information Version Date Editor Items treated Approved 1.0 2005-05 Fim, TBo, Pei initial version HB 2.0 2011-04 Pei, GLe, SKl, MBst draft readings, status of vessel, FSM, tank fillings AFl 2.1 2011-08 Pei, Jasch BW shifting tanks, amount of additional masses, AFl shifting weights, editorial changes 2 GL Leaflet for Inclining test and Lightweight survey V2.1 Table of contents: 1 Inclining Test........................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Purpose and objective..................................................................................................................... 4 1.2 Acceptance of the test..................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 Procedure of the inclining test ......................................................................................................... 5 1.3.1 Notification of the inclining test/lightweight survey.................................................................. 5 1.3.2 Condition of the vessel ........................................................................................................... 5 1.3.3 Mooring Arrangement.............................................................................................................5
  • Panamax - Wikipedia 4/20/20, 10�18 AM

    Panamax - Wikipedia 4/20/20, 1018 AM

    Panamax - Wikipedia 4/20/20, 1018 AM Panamax Panamax and New Panamax (or Neopanamax) are terms for the size limits for ships travelling through the Panama Canal. General characteristics The limits and requirements are published by the Panama Canal Panamax Authority (ACP) in a publication titled "Vessel Requirements".[1] Tonnage: 52,500 DWT These requirements also describe topics like exceptional dry Length: 289.56 m (950 ft) seasonal limits, propulsion, communications, and detailed ship design. Beam: 32.31 m (106 ft) Height: 57.91 m (190 ft) The allowable size is limited by the width and length of the available lock chambers, by the depth of water in the canal, and Draft: 12.04 m (39.5 ft) by the height of the Bridge of the Americas since that bridge's Capacity: 5,000 TEU construction. These dimensions give clear parameters for ships Notes: Opened 1914 destined to traverse the Panama Canal and have influenced the design of cargo ships, naval vessels, and passenger ships. General characteristics New Panamax specifications have been in effect since the opening of Panamax the canal in 1914. In 2009 the ACP published the New Panamax Tonnage: 120,000 DWT specification[2] which came into effect when the canal's third set of locks, larger than the original two, opened on 26 June 2016. Length: 366 m (1,201 ft) Ships that do not fall within the Panamax-sizes are called post- Beam: 51.25 m (168 ft) Panamax or super-Panamax. Height: 57.91 m (190 ft) The increasing prevalence of vessels of the maximum size is a Draft: 15.2 m (50 ft) problem for the canal, as a Panamax ship is a tight fit that Capacity: 13,000 TEU requires precise control of the vessel in the locks, possibly resulting in longer lock time, and requiring that these ships Notes: Opened 2016 transit in daylight.
  • 13.012 Hydrodynamics for Ocean Engineers Reading #3

    13.012 Hydrodynamics for Ocean Engineers Reading #3

    13.012 Hydrodynamics for Ocean Engineers Reading #3 13.012 Hydrodynamics for Ocean Engineers Prof. A.H. Techet Fall 2004 Archimedes’s Principle and Static Stability “Any object, wholly or partly immersed in a fluid, is buoyed up by a force equal to the weight of the fluid displaced by the object.” “The apparent loss in weight of a body immersed in a fluid is equal to the weight of the displaced fluid.” I. Archimedes’s Principle: The force on a body due to pressure alone (in the absence of viscous forces) K F = ∫∫ p nˆ ds (3.1) S where pressure is a function of depth below the free surface: p(z) = −ρgz . (3.2) K F = ∫∫ p nˆ ds = − ρg ∫∫ z nˆ ds (3.3) S S By Calculus the surface integral can be converted into a volume integral (Gauss’s Theorem/Divergence Theorem): K K ∫∫G ⋅ nˆ ds = ∫∫∫∇ ⋅G dV (3.4) SV Thus equation becomes: K FpndsgzndsgdVgVk==−=∫∫ˆˆρρρ ∫∫ ∫∫∫ =ˆ (3.5) SSV version 3.0 updated 9/8/2004 -1- ©2003, 2004 aht 13.012 Hydrodynamics for Ocean Engineers Reading #3 We can see now that the buoyancy force acts to counterbalance the displaced volume of fluid. For a half submerged body the area of the water plane must be accounted for in the integration. II. Moment on a body (Ideal Fluid) The moment on a submerged body follows directly from structural mechanics or dynamics methodologies. K K M = p(x × nˆ) ds ≡ (M ,M ,M ) = (M ,M ,M ) (3.6) ∫∫ 1 2 3 x y z S Figure 1: x, y, z coordinate reference frame.
  • Course Objectives Chapter 2 2. Hull Form and Geometry

    Course Objectives Chapter 2 2. Hull Form and Geometry

    COURSE OBJECTIVES CHAPTER 2 2. HULL FORM AND GEOMETRY 1. Be familiar with ship classifications 2. Explain the difference between aerostatic, hydrostatic, and hydrodynamic support 3. Be familiar with the following types of marine vehicles: displacement ships, catamarans, planing vessels, hydrofoil, hovercraft, SWATH, and submarines 4. Learn Archimedes’ Principle in qualitative and mathematical form 5. Calculate problems using Archimedes’ Principle 6. Read, interpret, and relate the Body Plan, Half-Breadth Plan, and Sheer Plan and identify the lines for each plan 7. Relate the information in a ship's lines plan to a Table of Offsets 8. Be familiar with the following hull form terminology: a. After Perpendicular (AP), Forward Perpendiculars (FP), and midships, b. Length Between Perpendiculars (LPP or LBP) and Length Overall (LOA) c. Keel (K), Depth (D), Draft (T), Mean Draft (Tm), Freeboard and Beam (B) d. Flare, Tumble home and Camber e. Centerline, Baseline and Offset 9. Define and compare the relationship between “centroid” and “center of mass” 10. State the significance and physical location of the center of buoyancy (B) and center of flotation (F); locate these points using LCB, VCB, TCB, TCF, and LCF st 11. Use Simpson’s 1 Rule to calculate the following (given a Table of Offsets): a. Waterplane Area (Awp or WPA) b. Sectional Area (Asect) c. Submerged Volume (∇S) d. Longitudinal Center of Flotation (LCF) 12. Read and use a ship's Curves of Form to find hydrostatic properties and be knowledgeable about each of the properties on the Curves of Form 13. Calculate trim given Taft and Tfwd and understand its physical meaning i 2.1 Introduction to Ships and Naval Engineering Ships are the single most expensive product a nation produces for defense, commerce, research, or nearly any other function.
  • Tendency Toward Mega Containerships and the Constraints of Container Terminals

    Tendency Toward Mega Containerships and the Constraints of Container Terminals

    Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Article Tendency toward Mega Containerships and the Constraints of Container Terminals Nam Kyu Park 1,* and Sang Cheol Suh 2 1 Department of International Logistics, Tongmyong University, Busan 48520, Korea 2 Institute of Port & Logistics Industry, Busan 48520, Korea; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +82-010-3575-1004 Received: 25 February 2019; Accepted: 17 April 2019; Published: 6 May 2019 Abstract: This paper focuses on the coping ability of the existing container terminals when mega containerships call at a port. The length of 30,000 TEU (Twenty Equivalent Unit) ships are predicted to be 453 m and occupy 498 m of a quay wall. As a result, the length of berth should be more than a minimum of 500 m. If a 25,000 TEU ship or 30,000 TEU ship call at a terminal, the outreach of QC (Quay Crane) should be a minimum 74.3 m or 81.0 m respectively. As mega ships are calling at the port, the ship waiting time, the available stacking area, and the number of handling equipment can be limited. The analysis reveals that larger ships wait for longer than the smaller ones because they have difficulty allocating the proper seat on berth. As a result of the survey in a terminal, the average occupancy is shown to be 60.4%, the minimum is 52.4%, and the maximum is 73.3%. Surveying the monthly equipment operation rate for 3 years, the average is 85.8%, the minimum is 80.1%, and the maximum is 90.1%.
  • Us Tonnage Regulations Application for Formal Measurement Services

    Us Tonnage Regulations Application for Formal Measurement Services

    U.S. TONNAGE REGULATIONS MTN 01-98 APPLICATION FOR FORMAL MEASUREMENT SERVICES as amended I. APPLICABILITY A U.S. flag vessel is eligible to be measured under the Convention system (46 CFR 69 subpart B) if it is 79 feet or more in overall length. Also, any U.S. flag vessel, regardless of length, may be measured under the Standard system (46 CFR 69 subpart C) or Dual system (46 CFR 69 subpart D). Some vessels, including those that are less than 79 feet in overall length, are eligible to be measured under the Simplified system (46 CFR 69 subpart E), without the need for formal measurement. Refer to section 69.11 of 46 CFR 69 for complete measurement eligibility details. II. APPLICATION INFORMATION *1. REQUESTED SERVICE (see instructions on reverse) 12. OVERALL HULL DIMENSIONS Length = ________ ft Breadth = _______ ft Depth = ______ ft INITIAL MEASUREMENT (indicate measurement system(s)) Subpart B - Convention system ( GT ITC / NT ITC ) Subpart C - Standard system ( GRT / NRT ) Subpart D - Dual system ( GRT / NRT ) REMEASUREMENT (indicate reason(s)) Configuration changes Change in passengers or draft 13. ADDITIONAL VESSEL INFORMATION Correction of measurement errors a. PROPULSION: Self-Propelled Non-Self-Propelled Other (describe in remarks) b. NUMBER OF PASSENGERS: OTHER (describe in remarks) Total: _____ Accommodated in cabins for 8 or fewer: _____ *2. REQUESTED TONNAGE CERTIFICATE(S): US ITC69 c. NUMBER OF CARGO SPACES: ______ *3. VESSEL NAME ____________________________________ d. NUMBER OF PORTABLE ENCLOSED SPACES: ______ e. DRAFT RESTRICTIONS: Load Line Other *4. VESSEL NUMBER ___________________________________ Stability Letter 5. HAILING PORT _____________________________________ f. INTENDED VOYAGES: Domestic Great Lakes 6.
  • The Impact of Mega-Ships

    The Impact of Mega-Ships

    The Impact of Mega-Ships Case-Specific Policy Analysis The Impact of Mega-Ships Case-Specific Policy Analysis INTERNATIONAL TRANSPORT FORUM The International Transport Forum at the OECD is an intergovernmental organisation with 54 member countries. It acts as a strategic think tank with the objective of helping shape the transport policy agenda on a global level and ensuring that it contributes to economic growth, environmental protection, social inclusion and the preservation of human life and well-being. The International Transport Forum organises an Annual Summit of ministers along with leading representatives from industry, civil society and academia. The International Transport Forum was created under a Declaration issued by the Council of Ministers of the ECMT (European Conference of Ministers of Transport) at its Ministerial Session in May 2006 under the legal authority of the Protocol of the ECMT, signed in Brussels on 17 October 1953, and legal instruments of the OECD. The Members of the Forum are: Albania, Armenia, Australia, Austria, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Bulgaria, Canada, Chile, China (People’s Republic of), Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, India, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Korea, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Mexico, Republic of Moldova, Montenegro, Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russian Federation, Serbia, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey, Ukraine, United Kingdom and United States. The International Transport Forum’s Research Centre gathers statistics and conducts co-operative research programmes addressing all modes of transport. Its findings are widely disseminated and support policy making in Member countries as well as contributing to the Annual Summit.
  • Containerization of the Baltic

    Containerization of the Baltic

    CONTAINERIZATION OF THE BALTIC SEA - A COMPETITIVE PERSPECTIVE inspired by challenges of rivalry and interchange between the gateways of Kattegat/The Sound and Gdansk Bay Centre for Regional Analysis (CRA) School of Business, Economics and Law at University of Gothenburg Sten Lorentzon www.cra.handels.gu.se Working Paper 2014:1 CONTENTS Page Introduction 1 Approach 2 Background 5 Containerization; development of ships and ports 9 Main ports of northern Europe – an overview 10 Main ports of the Baltic Sea – an overview 12 Gateways of the Baltic Sea – competitive perspective 18 Ports of Gothenburg and Gdansk/Gdynia – 23 competition and cooperation Functions of the ports 23 Competitive challenges 25 Cooperative challenges 27 Concluding remarks 29 Appendix A: Baltic Link 34 Appendix B: Cargo ships in movement to destinations 35 in the Baltic Sea Appendix C: Ships of more than 200 metres length in the 36 Baltic Sea in movement northwards to Baltic destinations Appendix D: Flows of traffic of cargo ships with marking of 38 number of passages in both directions in 2011. References 39 Preface The introduction of new big container ships sends waves on established transport systems and illustrates the need to satisfy the demand for ports enabling efficient loading and unloading. This study is an attempt to throw light on the impact of containerization on the accessibility of ports at the Baltic Sea with attention paid to the changing conditions after the fall of the Wall. Former locked in areas have become hinterlands of ports serving the international market. EU has strengthened this integration in efforts made in Interreg-programs exemplified by the Baltic Link stretching from Trondheim in the North via Gothenburg to Adriatic ports in the South.
  • Ship Types & Sizes

    Ship Types & Sizes

    The Source for Maritime Information and Insight Chris Pålsson, Director, IHS Fairplay Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. 1 Size matters Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. 2 Endorsed by the IMSF 2011 Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. 4 Basis for size categories • Dimensional limitations – Passages, straits, canals, bridges, locks….. • Operational – Rate setting mechanisms – Cargo batch sizes – Type of service – Range of service – ….. Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. 5 Lingo • Handysize, small/large • VLCC • Handymax, large • ULCC • Supramax • VLGC • Panamax, sub/post/new • Feeder • Kamsarmax • ULCS • Capesize, mini • Seawaymax • VLOC • Chinamax • MR, small/large • Q-max • Aframax • Säfflemax • Suezmax • …. Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. 6 Dimensional limitations Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. 7 Panama Canal Panamax – L 294.1 m – B 32.3 m – D 12.04 m – H 61.3 New Panamax – L 366 m – B 49 m – D 15.2 m Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. – H 61.3 8 Suez Canal Suez Canal Bridge Shohada 25 January Bridge Egyptian-Japanese Friendship Bridge Max draft: 20.1 m, Max height: 68 m Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. 9 The Strait of Malacca Depth 25 m. Max draft 21 m. Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. 10 St Lawrence Seaway • L 225.6 m (740 feet) • B 23.8 m (78 feet) • D 7.9 m (26 feet) • H 35.5 m (116 feet) Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc. All Rights Reserved. 11 Qatar: Q-max • L 345 m (1,132 ft) • B 53.8 m (177 ft) • H 34.7 m (114 ft) Copyright © 2011 IHS Inc.
  • Angle of Loll Calculation by Cubic Spline

    Angle of Loll Calculation by Cubic Spline

    JOURNAL OF MARITIME RESEARCH Vol. X. No. 2 (2013), pp. 21 - 26 ISSN: 1697-4040, www.jmr.unican.es Angle of Loll Calculation By Cubic Spline I. Basterretxea1,2,*, I. Sotés1,3, A. López1,4 and I. Alcedo1,5 ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: Several years ago the Basque Government supported the programming of the software ARKITSAS in order to provide Received 28 February 2013; all existing vessels with a specific software to calculate stability, cargo and longitudinal strength data. The aim of this in revised form 12 March 2013; article is to present the part of that research concerning the definition of the static stability curve by cubic spline in its accepted 25 May 2013 initial end when the metacentric height is negative. Taking into account that the slope at initial end is known, the pre- cision of the results for low heeling angles may be improved and, in this way, the accuracy in the calculation of loll should be enhanced. This method of calculation is compared to other traditional methods used for wall-sided ships by Keywords: the application to three different ships. Static stability curve, Cubic splines, Free and fixed end, Angle of loll. © SEECMAR / All rights reserved 1. Introduction within the initial stability more precise and, taking into ac- count that the angle of loll is usually small; its calculation The static stability curve represents the values of GZ arms for would be suitable by means of non-free end cubic spline the different heeling angles. However, the stability booklet method. usually provides GZ arms for every ten or fifteen degrees of When the ship is ‘wall-sided’ the approximate formula in heeling angles.
  • DRAFT: 2018/2019 Update to Inventory for Ocean-Going Vessels: Methodology and Results

    DRAFT: 2018/2019 Update to Inventory for Ocean-Going Vessels: Methodology and Results

    Update to Inventory for Ocean-Going Vessels DRAFT: 2018/2019 Update to Inventory for Ocean-Going Vessels: Methodology and Results January 15, 2019 AIR RESOURCES BOARD 1 Update to Inventory for Ocean-Going Vessels Contents 1. Summary and Background...................................................................................... 5 2. Ocean-Going Vessel Background and Description ................................................. 6 2.1. Ocean-Going Vessel Marine Engines and Operations ................................ 9 2.2. Geographical Areas..................................................................................... 9 3. General Emissions Inventory Methodology and Sources...................................... 12 3.1. Base Year Vessel Visits and Time At Berth............................................... 13 3.2. Vessel Visit Length .................................................................................... 15 3.3. Effective Power (EP) ................................................................................. 19 3.4. Emission Factors (EF) ............................................................................... 22 4. Future Year Forecasts........................................................................................... 22 4.1. Freight Analysis Framework ...................................................................... 23 4.2. Mercator Forecast for Ports of LA/LB ........................................................ 27 4.3. Engine Tier Availability and Introduction...................................................

  • 15 Facts About Freigh T

    o u s Ab t F c t re a ig F h t 5 1 T h s e t c n e u x d t o s r t p a r g u e i o n t o f he journey Matching traded cargo to the right vessel takes flexibility, meticulous planning and highly specialized knowledge. Louis Dreyfus Company (LDC) invests in world-class logistics and tracking technology, and continually upgrades its port facilities and chartered fleet around the world, to deliver the most efficient Freight services to our customers and partners. A brief history of maritime trade: 1450 - 1815 - 1950 - tomorrow 1815 1950 today Global trade blossoms after voyages Empires make use of new steam With the rise of bulk shipping, companies A greener and more of discovery reach the New World engines and steel hulls to further their turn to oil - and diesel-fueled machinery responsible shipping business model across the globe and welded steel hulls, enabling a new, notably through low-cost model emission reduction Maritime trade accounts for 11 BILLION TONS Today, the world’s main of goods traded annually shipyards are in around the world 90% 50% China Japan dry bulk, of which 15% of global trade is agri-products S.Korea Philippines It takes approximately Common life span of a cargo vessel is Right now, there are as many as 12 MONTHS to build a cargo ship 20-30 YEARS 60,000 VESSELS ON THE JOB Dry bulk carriers can carry grains, Wet tankers are for vegetable oils, Liners carry containers packed Refrigerated ships transport oilseeds, sugar, rice and minerals ethanol and biodiesel with coffee and cotton orange juice The QUANTITY A VESSEL