DOCSLIB.ORG

Herries-And-Adams-20

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Herries-And-Adams-20 Journal of Human Evolution xxx (2013) 1e6 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Journal of Human Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/jhevol News and views Clarifying the context, dating and age range of the Gondolin hominins and Paranthropus in South Africa Andy I.R. Herries a,*, Justin W. Adams b a Australian Archaeomagnetism Laboratory, Department of Archaeology, Environment and Community Planning, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, La Trobe University, Melbourne Campus, Bundoora, 3086 VIC, Australia b Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Melbourne, 3800 VIC, Australia article info Article history: necessary to reply on fauna estimations for the age of these de- Received 1 March 2013 posits based on correlations with the other end of the African Accepted 7 June 2013 continent; and with little data existing in between. Moreover, Available online xxx recent geochronological studies on the South African caves has shown that many dates based on biochronological analysis with Keywords: Geochronology sites in East Africa are up to half a million years too old (Herries Paranthropus et al., 2010; Herries and Shaw, 2011). This discordance may relate Gondolin to South Africa functioning as both a continuous population refuge Sterkfontein and geographic origin for several Pleistocene and extant lineages Palaeokarst (see summary in Lorenzen et al., 2012; also Pickford, 2004). This Swartkrans Electron spin resonance expanding dataset on the complex, dynamic biogeography of Af- rican mammals precludes assuming that the South and East African sites, separated by 3000e4000 km, had homologous first/last appearance dates of species/lineages. It also highlights the impor- tance of using the current chronometric dating framework of South African localities to establish revised, ‘local’ biochronological Introduction data; particularly given the recycling in the literature of early bio- chronological dates that, themselves, were based in part on In a recent article, Grine et al. (2012) provided a thorough South African site dates that have been revised in recent years. analysis of the GD A-2 Paranthropus robustus M , one of the two 2 Here we review the dated record of Paranthropus in South Africa hominin specimens recovered from the Gondolin palaeocave in the (2.0e<1.0 Ma, Table 1), including that of Gondolin (1.95ew1.78 Ma; northeastern corner of the UNESCO Cradle of Humankind World Table 1) and review chronometric ages that Grine et al. (2012) Heritage Site (‘Cradle’), South Africa (Menter et al., 1999). Although dismiss as unreliable, so that such errors are not left to propagate we appreciate the detailed approach of their research on the their way through the published literature. hominin specimen, we wish to clarify several incorrect citations of our work at the Gondolin site, including the probable origin of the hominin specimens and age of the deposits. Moreover, Grine et al. Recovery and depositional context of the Gondolin hominins (2012) suggest that Paranthropus occurs in South Africa between 1.9 fl and 1.5 million years ago (Ma), an age range that does not re ect the As is the case at most South African palaeocaves, the Gondolin ages produced by a number of dating studies on Paranthropus- site was mined for lime deposits during the early 20th century. The bearing sites and continues to argue for the reliability of bio- mining activity at Gondolin was particularly extensive and oblit- chronology based on correlations with East Africa over existing erated the central portions of the cave system, leaving only chronometric ages that exist for the sites. With recent advances in extensive ex situ dumpsites and partial in situ remnants of the a number of dating methods that are applicable to the South original karstic deposits along the margins of the open cast mine African caves and studies that show their accurate cross correlation (Menter et al., 1999; Herries et al., 2006a,b; Adams et al., 2007). One (Lacruz et al., 2002; Herries et al., 2010, 2013) it is no longer of these in situ remnant deposits, designated GD 2, preserves a dense accumulation of fossils in a red siltstone matrix (Watson, * Corresponding author. 1993; Menter et al., 1999). The GD 2 deposits were excavated in E-mail addresses: [email protected], [email protected] (A.I.R. Herries). the late 1970s and yielded a rich faunal assemblage that was later 0047-2484/$ e see front matter Ó 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.06.007 Please cite this article in press as: Herries, A.I.R., Adams, J.W., Clarifying the context, dating and age range of the Gondolin hominins and Paranthropus in South Africa, Journal of Human Evolution (2013), http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2013.06.007 2 A.I.R. Herries, J.W. Adams / Journal of Human Evolution xxx (2013) 1e6 Table 1 Age ranges for the South African Paranthropus bearing units (2.0e0.6 Ma) based on a combination of multiple dating methods (Palaeomagnetism, ESR, UePb). Site Unit Age Method Reference Swartkrans Member 1 hanging remnant 2.0e1.8 Ma UePb, ESR Pickering et al. (2011), Curnoe et al. (2001), This paper Swartkrans Member 1 lower bank Sometime between 2.3 and 1.6 Ma UePb Pickering et al. (2011) (likely contemporary with Hanging Remnant) Gondolin GD 1 w1.78 Ma Palaeomag. Fauna Herries et al. (2006), Adams et al. (2007) Gondolin GD 2 1.95e1.78 Ma (w1.8 Ma) Palaeomag. Fauna Herries et al. (2006), Adams et al. (2007) Gondolin GD A 1.95ew1.78 Ma Correlation/fauna Herries et al. (2006), Adams et al. (2007) Kromdraai B Member 3 1.8e1.6 Ma Palaeomag. Fauna Thackeray et al. (2002), Herries et al. (2009) Sterkfontein Member 5b 1.8e1.5 Ma Palaeomag. UePb, ESR Curnoe (1999), Pickering and Kramers (2010), Herries and Shaw (2011) Swartkrans Member 2 1.7e1.1 Ma UePb Balter et al. (2008) Cooper’s D Upper facies A and C <1.4 Ma UePb de Ruiter et al. (2009) Cooper’s D Lower facies A and C 1.6e1.4 Ma UePb de Ruiter et al. (2009) Drimolen All 2.0e<1.4 Ma Faunal estimate Keyser et al., 2000, This paper Swartkrans Member 3 1.3e0.6 Ma UePb, ESR Blackwell (1994), Balter et al. (2008) only partially described (Watson, 1993). Subsequent analysis of the processed fossils; a position that has not been advocated in any entire GD 2 assemblage (Adams and Conroy, 2005; Adams, 2006, prior publications on the Gondolin hominins or fossil deposits (e.g., 2010) failed to identify any primate remains among the 95,549 Menter et al., 1999; Adams and Conroy, 2005; Adams, 2006; Herries specimens recovered from the GD 2 sample. The only other in situ et al., 2006a,b; Adams et al., 2007; Adams, 2010). In sum, we wish to fossil-bearing deposits thus far identified at Gondolin, designated reinforce that: 1) the Dumpsite A ex situ calcified sediments have GD 1, occur along the western rim of the excavated cave system and never been described as being either largely or exclusively derived consist of a complex mix of grey breccia, conglomerates and other from deposits near the GD 1 datum point; 2) only the grey finer-grained clastic sediments that have become partially decal- ‘Conglomerate Unit’ ex situ blocks from Trench A are similar to cified through erosional dissolution (Adams et al., 2007). Excava- those in the GD 1 in situ deposits; 3) both of the ex situ Gondolin tion of these deposits and analysis of the 4843 specimens recovered hominin teeth were processed from ‘Finer Clastic Unit’ blocks that fossil assemblage also failed to identify any primate specimens and have a red siltstone matrix dissimilar to that of the GD 1 deposits the hominin remains are an oddity in this respect (Adams, 2006). (but resembling that near the northern [GD 2] and southern [GD 3] At present the only primate (including hominin) bearing deposit datum points); and 4) neither of the Gondolin hominin specimens at Gondolin is ‘Dumpsite A’, a massive ex situ pile of calcified sed- have been definitively associated with excavated in situ deposits at iments near the southwestern edge of the mined cave system the site (GD 1, GD 2). (Menter et al., 1999; Adams, 2006). Excavation in 1997 into the top of the dumpsite through two adjacent 1 m2 units to a depth of Dating of the Gondolin site deposits approximately 2 m (Trench A) yielded both the GD A-2 P. robustus M2, as well as a partial, indeterminate hominin lower molar (GD A- It has seemingly become the opinion that the South African 1) (Menter et al., 1999). In their description of the recovery of the palaeocave sites are too complex to understand and thus date two hominin specimens, Menter et al. (1999) noted the occurrence accurately. This is a view perpetuated by studies of, and arguments of at least two types of calcified sediment blocks within Dump A: a over, the dating and geology of complex multi-generational sites grey, clastic ‘breccia’ (Conglomerate Unit sensu Menter et al.) and a where multiple phases of karstification, infilling and erosion occur, fine, red siltstone with sporadic clasts (Finer Clastic Unit sensu such as Sterkfontein (Partridge, 2000; Clarke, 2007; Pickering and Menter et al.). Both hominin teeth were recovered from small Kramers, 2010). Moreover, mis-citation and continued misrepre- blocks attributed to this Finer Clastic Unit and no attempt was made sentation of dating methods in papers that are not fundamentally to specifically associate the ex situ blocks with the limited GD 1 or about dating, as is the case in Grine et al.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Title: Drimolen Crania Indicate Contemporaneity of Australopithecus, Paranthropus and Early Homo Erectus in S
    Submitted Manuscript: Confidential Title: Drimolen crania indicate contemporaneity of Australopithecus, Paranthropus and early Homo erectus in S. Africa Authors: Andy I.R. Herries1,2*†, Jesse M. Martin1†, A.B. Leece1†, Justin W. Adams3,2†, Giovanni Boschian4,2†, Renaud Joannes-Boyau5,2, Tara R. Edwards1, Tom Mallett1, Jason Massey3,6, Ashleigh Murszewski1, Simon Neuebauer7, Robyn Pickering8.9, David Strait10,2, Brian J. Armstrong2, Stephanie Baker2, Matthew V. Caruana2, Tim Denham11, John Hellstrom12, Jacopo Moggi-Cecchi13, Simon Mokobane2, Paul Penzo-Kajewski1, Douglass S. Rovinsky3, Gary T. Schwartz14, Rhiannon C. Stammers1, Coen Wilson1, Jon Woodhead12, Colin Menter13 Affiliations: 1. Palaeoscience Labs, Dept. Archaeology and History, La Trobe University, Bundoora, 3086, VIC, Australia. 2. Palaeo-Research Institute, University of Johannesburg, Gauteng Province, South Africa. 3. Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, VIC, Australia. 4. Department of Biology, University of Pisa, Italy 5. Geoarchaeology and Archaeometry Research Group (GARG), Southern Cross University, Military Rd, Lismore, 2480, NSW, Australia 6. Department of Integrative Biology and Physiology, University of Minnesota Medical School, USA 7. Department of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Germany. 8. Department of Geological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa 9. Human Evolution Research Institute, University of Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa 10. Department of Anthropology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, USA 11. Geoarchaeology Research Group, School of Archaeology and Anthropology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia 12. Earth Sciences, University of Melbourne, Australia 13. Department of Biology, University of Florence, Italy 14. Institute of Human Origins, School of Human Evolution and Social Change, Arizona State University, U.S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Speleology and Magnetobiostratigraphic Chronology of the Buffalo Cave Fossil Site, Makapansgat, South Africa ⁎ Andy I.R
    Quaternary Research 66 (2006) 233–245 www.elsevier.com/locate/yqres Speleology and magnetobiostratigraphic chronology of the Buffalo Cave fossil site, Makapansgat, South Africa ⁎ Andy I.R. Herries a,b, , Kaye E. Reed c, Kevin L. Kuykendall d, Alf G. Latham e a Geomagnetism Laboratory, University of Liverpool, L69 7ZE, UK b Palaeoanthropology Research Group, School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Kensington, Sydney 2052, Australia c Institute of Human Origins, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA d Department of Archaeology, University of Sheffield, UK e Department of Archaeology, Hartley Building, University of Liverpool, L69 3BX, UK Received 30 September 2004 Available online 12 June 2006 Abstract Speleological, stratigraphic, paleomagnetic and faunal data is presented for the Buffalo Cave fossil site in the Limpopo Province of South Africa. Speleothems and clastic deposits were sampled for paleomagnetic and mineral magnetic analysis from the northern part of the site, where stratigraphic relationships could be more easily defined and a magnetostratigraphy could therefore be developed for the site. This is also where excavations recovered the fossil material described. A comparison of the east and South African first and last appearance data with the Buffalo Cave fauna was then used to constrain the magnetostratigraphy to produce a more secure age for the site. The magnetostratigraphy showed a change from normal to reversed polarity in the basal speleothems followed by a short normal polarity period in the base of the clastic deposits and a slow change to reversed directions for the remainder of the sequence. The biochronology suggested an optimal age range of between 1.0 Ma and 600,000 yr based on faunal correlation with eastern and southern Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological and Taphonomic Context for the New Hominin Species Homo Naledi from the Dinaledi Chamber, South Africa
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2015 Geological and taphonomic context for the new hominin species Homo naledi from the Dinaledi Chamber, South Africa Dirks, Paul HGM; Berger, Lee R; Roberts, Eric M; Kramers, Jan D; Hawks, John; Randolph-Quinney, Patrick S; Elliott, Marina; Musiba, Charles M; Churchill, Steven E; de Ruiter, Darryl J; Schmid, Peter; Backwell, Lucinda R; Belyanin, Georgy A; Boshoff, Pedro; Hunter, K Lindsay; Feuerriegel, Elen M; Gurtov, Alia; Harrison, James du G; Hunter, Rick; Kruger, Ashley; Morris, Hannah; Makhubela, Tebogo V; Peixotto, Becca; Tucker, Steven Abstract: We describe the physical context of the Dinaledi Chamber within the Rising Star cave, South Africa, which contains the fossils of Homo naledi. Approximately 1550 specimens of hominin remains have been recovered from at least 15 individuals, representing a small portion of the total fossil content. Macro-vertebrate fossils are exclusively H. naledi, and occur within clay-rich sediments derived from in situ weathering, and exogenous clay and silt, which entered the chamber through fractures that prevented passage of coarser-grained material. The chamber was always in the dark zone, and not accessible to non-hominins. Bone taphonomy indicates that hominin individuals reached the chamber complete, with disarticulation occurring during/after deposition. Hominins accumulated over time as older laminated mudstone units and sediment along the cave floor were eroded. Preliminary
    [Show full text]
  • Carnivore Community
    identified from Drimolen, Kromdraai, Sterkfontein A preliminary and Swartkrans; large-spotted genets (Genetta assessment of the tigrina) have been identified from Plovers Lake and Swartkrans; small-spotted genets (Genetta carnivore community genetta) from Sterkfontein; honey badger (Mellivora outside Johannesburg, capensis), African clawless otter (Aonyx capensis) and black-backed jackal all from Plovers Lake South Africa (Werdelin & Peigné 2010). This illustrates the resilience of these species in the region. Brian F. Kuhn To gain a better understanding of the current Evolutionary Studies Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, carnivore community inhabiting the Cradle of Johannesburg, WITS, 2050 South Africa Humankind we used camera traps to investigate E-mail: [email protected] the presence of carnivores in the Malapa Nature Received 8 May 2012. Accepted 21 January 2014 Reserve and John Nash Nature Reserve. We report INTRODUCTION on the number of species detected and frequency The UNESCO Sterkfontein, Swartkrans, Kromdraai of detection. and Evirons World Heritage Site, known as the Cradle of Humankind (–25.948938°S;27.784395°E) METHODS in South Africa, is known for its numerous fossil sites (Hilton-Barber & Berger 2002; Dirks et al. Study area 2010) but little is known regarding its current carni- The Malapa Nature Reserve and John Nash vore diversity. Occasionally a leopard (Panthera Nature Reserve are situated in the heart of the pardus) attack will make the news and a leopard Cradle of Humankind. The combined fenced den was examined in 2000 (de Ruiter & Berger reserves comprise approximately 6730 ha of 2000; de Ruiter & Berger 2001), while local ranchers privately owned land. The land consists of grass- and farm managers report a high number of lands, Backenveld vegetation and wetlands and black-backed jackals (Canis mesomelas) in the transitions between the Carletonvillle Dolomite area (H.
    [Show full text]
  • Herpestidae Remains from the Early Pleistocene Cooper's D Locality In
    1 Mongoose Manor: Herpestidae remains from the Early Pleistocene Cooper’s D locality in the Cradle of Humankind, Gauteng, South Africa Brigette F. Cohen1, 2, *, Hannah J. O’Regan 3, Christine M. Steininger2, 4 1 Natural History Department, Iziko South African Museum, Gardens, PO Box 61, Cape Town, 8000 2Evolutionary Studies Institute, University of the Witwatersrand, Private Bag 3, Wits 2050, Johannesburg, South Africa 3Department of Classics and Archaeology, Humanities Building, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, U.K. 4DST-NRF Centre of Excellence in Palaeosciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg *Corresponding Author Email Addresses: [email protected] (BF Cohen), [email protected] (HJ O’Regan), [email protected] (CM Steininger) ABSTRACT Mongooses (Herpestidae) are an important component of African ecosystems, and a common constituent of southern African fossil assemblages. Despite this, mongoose fossils from the Cradle of Humankind, Gauteng, South Africa, have received relatively little interest. This paper presents the diverse mongoose craniodental assemblage of the Early Pleistocene fossil locality Cooper’s D. A total of 29 mongoose specimens from five genera were identified at Cooper’s including numerous first appearances in the Cradle or in South Africa. The exceptional mongoose assemblage at Cooper’s likely reflects the effects of an unknown taphonomic process, although mongooses follow other carnivore 2 groups in the Cradle in displaying an apparent preference for the southern part. This investigation shows the value of mongooses as palaeoecological indicators and supports previous interpretations of the environment at Cooper’s as grassland with a strong woody component near a permanent water source.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconstructing Human Evolution: Achievements, Challenges, and Opportunities
    Reconstructing human evolution: Achievements, challenges, and opportunities Bernard Wood1 George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052 This contribution reviews the evidence that has resolved the can then be used as the equivalent of a null hypothesis when branching structure of the higher primate part of the tree of life considering where to place newly discovered fossil great ape taxa. and the substantial body of fossil evidence for human evolution. It considers some of the problems faced by those who try to interpret The Human Fossil Record. The fossil record of the human clade the taxonomy and systematics of the human fossil record. How do consists of fossil evidence for modern humans plus that of all ex- you to tell an early human taxon from one in a closely related clade? tinct taxa that are hypothesized to be more closely related to How do you determine the number of taxa represented in the modern humans than to any other living taxon. Not so long ago human clade? How can homoplasy be recognized and factored into nearly all researchers were comfortable with according the human attempts to recover phylogeny? clade the status of a family, the Hominidae, with the nonhuman extant great apes (i.e., chimpanzees, bonobos, gorillas, and history | hominin orangutans) placed in a separate family, the Pongidae. But given the abundant evidence for a closer relationship between Pan and his contribution begins by considering two achievements rele- Homo than between Pan and Gorilla (see above), many research- Tvant to reconstructing human evolution: resolving the branch- ers have concluded that the human clade should be distinguished ing structure of the higher primate part of the tree of life and the beneath the level of the family in the Linnaean hierarchy.
    [Show full text]
  • Terrestrial Laser Scanning and Photogrammetry Techniques for Documenting Fossil‐Bearing Palaeokarst with an Example from the Drimolen Palaeocave System, South Africa
    Revised: 15 February 2017 Accepted: 11 July 2017 DOI: 10.1002/arp.1580 RESEARCH ARTICLE Terrestrial laser scanning and photogrammetry techniques for documenting fossil‐bearing palaeokarst with an example from the Drimolen Palaeocave System, South Africa Brian J. Armstrong1 | Alex F. Blackwood1 | Paul Penzo‐Kajewski1 | Colin G. Menter2 | Andy I.R. Herries1,2 1 Palaeoscience Laboratories, Department of Archaeology and History, La Trobe University, Abstract Melbourne Campus, Bundoora, 3086, Victoria, This paper presents the results of a recent three‐dimensional (3D) survey at the Drimolen Australia Makondo palaeontological deposits in the Hominid Sites of South Africa UNESCO World 2 Centre for Anthropological Research, Heritage site. The Drimolen Makondo is a palaeokarstic feature that consists of a heavily eroded University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, 2.6‐2.0 Ma fossil‐bearing palaeocave remnant. With photogrammetry and a laser scan survey, Gauteng Province, South Africa two 3D site models were created, georectified, and imported into geographical information sys- Correspondence Brian J. Armstrong, Palaeoscience tem software. This paper outlines both of these survey techniques and provides an assessment Laboratories, Department of Archaeology and of the relevant merits of each method and their applicability for detailed recording and archival History, La Trobe University, Melbourne documentation of palaeokarstic palaeontological and archaeological sites. Given the complex Campus, Bundoora, 3086, VIC, Australia. Email: [email protected];
    [Show full text]
  • An Acheulean Handaxe from Gladysvale Cave Site, Gauteng
    Research in Action South African Journal of Science 102, March/April 2006 103 Stratigraphy of the outer deposits An Acheulean handaxe from Sedimentologically, two distinct units appear to be present in the outer deposits: Gladysvale Cave Site, Gauteng, the GVED and a partially exposed talus cone (Fig 2). The exposed section of the South Africa GVED is about 5 m thick and consists of domes of calcified breccia surrounded by a,b* b,e b,c pockets of decalcified material. Both areas Grant Hall , Robyn Pickering , Rodrigo Lacruz , are fossiliferous in nature and most likely c b b,d John Hancox , Lee R. Berger and Peter Schmid represent a single deposit, which under- went a post-depositional phase of prefer- ential decalcification, probably as a result E DESCRIBE A SINGLE HANDAXE FROM deeper underground deposits have been of the de-roofing of this part of the cave fossiliferous breccias at Gladysvale only partially explored, and contain both and presence of tree roots growing down WCave, South Africa. The artefact is the calcified and decalcified breccias, which into the deposits. The calcified breccias only known tool so far discovered during the have been excavated by members of the of the GVED are clearly stratified, an controlled excavations conducted at this site over the last decade, and was recovered from University of Zurich. Three-dimensional unusual occurrence within South African decalcified sediments near the stratigraphic Geographical Information System (GIS) cave deposits, and nine sedimentary interface of two breccia units, making it diffi- images showing the associations between units (A to I) can be identified, by clast and cult to assign it with confidence to either.
    [Show full text]
  • A Preliminary Estimate of the Age of the Gladysv Ale Australopithecine Site
    Palaeont. afr., 30, 51-55 (1993) A PRELIMINARY ESTIMATE OF THE AGE OF THE GLADYSV ALE AUSTRALOPITHECINE SITE by Lee. R. Berger Palaeo-Anthropology Research Unit, Department ofAnatomy and Human Biology, University of the Witwatersrand, Medical School, 7 York Rd., Parktown, Johannesburg 2193 ABSTRACT Excavations conducted at the Gladysvale site in the Transvaal, South Africa during 1991 -1992 have revealed an abundant Plio-Pleistocene fossil fauna from the limeworks breccia dumps and in situ decalcified deposits. To date, over 600 specifically identifiable macro-mammalian specimens have been recovered including the remains of Australopithecus. These identifications have revealed that the Gladysvale site has an extremely diverse macro-mammalian faunal assemblage equal to many other South African Plio-Pleistocene fossil sites. Comparison of the Gladysvale macro­ mammalian fauna with those of the other early hominid-associated sites in South Africa indicates an age for the deposit(s) at Gladysvale between 1.7- 2.5 m.a.. ln addition, the Kromdraai A macro­ mammalian assemblage is considered to be closer in age to the Gladysvale assemblage than any other South African faunal assemblage. KEY WORDS: Australopthecus, Gladysvale, Macro-mammalian chronology INTRODUCTION Despite the site's richness in fossil bone, it was not until In November of 1991, a joint excavation project by the recently that the breccias were extensively sampled. Only Palaeo-Anthropology Research Unit and the South Afri­ a few fossils had previously been identified from the site, can Geological Survey was undertaken at the Gladysvale most of these were recovered by the University of fossil site in the Krugersdorp District, approximately 13 California, Berkeley expedition of 1947-48, and km east of Sterkfontein.
    [Show full text]
  • U–Pb-Dated Flowstones Restrict South African Early Hominin Record to Dry Climate Phases Robyn Pickering1,2*, Andy I
    LETTER https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0711-0 U–Pb-dated flowstones restrict South African early hominin record to dry climate phases Robyn Pickering1,2*, Andy I. R. Herries3,4, Jon D. Woodhead5, John C. Hellstrom5, Helen E. Green5, Bence Paul5, Terrence Ritzman2,6,7, David S. Strait7, Benjamin J. Schoville2,8 & Phillip J. Hancox9 The Cradle of Humankind (Cradle) in South Africa preserves a of the flowstones. The intervening times represent substantially rich collection of fossil hominins representing Australopithecus, drier phases, during which fossils of hominins and other fossils Paranthropus and Homo1. The ages of these fossils are contentious2–4 accumulated in open caves. Fossil preservation, restricted to and have compromised the degree to which the South African drier intervals, thus biases the view of hominin evolutionary hominin record can be used to test hypotheses of human evolution. history and behaviour, and places the hominins in a community However, uranium–lead (U–Pb) analyses of horizontally bedded of comparatively dry-adapted fauna. Although the periods of cave layers of calcium carbonate (flowstone) provide a potential closure leave temporal gaps in the South African fossil record, the opportunity to obtain a robust chronology5. Flowstones are flowstones themselves provide valuable insights into both local and ubiquitous cave features and provide a palaeoclimatic context, pan-African climate variability. because they grow only during phases of increased effective The early hominin fossil record in South Africa is best represented precipitation6,7, ideally in closed caves. Here we show that flowstones by deposits preserved in a series of dolomite caves 40 km northwest from eight Cradle caves date to six narrow time intervals between of Johannesburg (Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Speleology and Magnetobiostratigraphic Chronology of the GD 2 Locality of the Gondolin Hominin-Bearing Paleocave Deposits, North West Province, South Africa
    Journal of Human Evolution 51 (2006) 617e631 Speleology and magnetobiostratigraphic chronology of the GD 2 locality of the Gondolin hominin-bearing paleocave deposits, North West Province, South Africa Andy I.R. Herries a,e,*, Justin W. Adams b,c, Kevin L. Kuykendall d,c, John Shaw e a Palaeoanthropology Research Group, Department of Anatomy, School of Medical Sciences, University of New South Wales, Kensington 2052, Sydney, Australia b Department of Anthropology, Washington University, Campus Box 1114, One Brookings Drive, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA c School of Anatomical Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa d Department of Archaeology, University of Sheffield, S1 4ET, UK e Geomagnetism Laboratory, School of Archaeology, Classics and Egyptology, Oliver Lodge, University of Liverpool, L69 7ZE, UK Received 6 October 2005; accepted 7 July 2006 Abstract Speleological, paleomagnetic, mineral magnetic, and biochronological analyses have been undertaken at the Gondolin hominin-bearing paleocave, North West Province, South Africa. Two fossiliferous but stratigraphically separate sequences, GD2 and GD1/3, which were once part of a large cavern system, have been identified. Although some comparative paleomagnetic samples were taken from the GD 1, 3, and 4 localities that are currently under investigation, the research presented here focuses on the fossil-rich, in situ deposits at locality GD 2, excavated by E.S. Vrba in 1979. The GD 2 deposits are dominated by normal-polarity calcified clastic deposits that are sandwiched between clastic-free flowstone speleothems. The lower flowstone has a sharp contact with the red siltstone deposits and is of reversed polarity. The capping flowstone shows a change from normal to reversed polarity, thereby preserving a polarity reversal.
    [Show full text]
  • Tracing the Directorial Process of Theatrical Translation: a Practice-Led Case Study
    TRACING THE DIRECTORIAL PROCESS OF THEATRICAL TRANSLATION: A PRACTICE-LED CASE STUDY By Anitra Michelle Davel A mini-dissertation submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree MAGISTER ARTIUM (PERFORMANCE) in the Department of Drama at the UNIVERSITY OF PRETORIA FACULTY OF HUMANITIES Supervisors: Professor M. Munro Professor M-H. Coetzee August 2014 © University of Pretoria i TABLE OF CONTENTS Front Page Table of Contents i Declaration vi Acknowledgements vii Abstract viii Keywords ix Chapter 1 – Introduction 1 1.1 Research Problem, Investigative Question, Research Objectives and 2 Approach 1.1.1 Research Problem 2 1.1.2 Investigative Question 2 3 1.1.3 Research Objectives 1.1.3.1 Pre-Production Research Objectives 3 1.1.3.2 In-Production Research Objectives 3 1.1.3.3 Post Production Research Objectives 4 1.1.4 Research Approach 4 1.1.4.1 Research Phase 1 6 1.1.4.2 Research Phase 2 7 1.1.4.3 Research Phase 3 7 1.1.4.4 Research Phase 4 7 1.2 Chapter Outline 8 © University of Pretoria ii Chapter 2 – Musical Theatre in Context 11 2.1 The definition of Musical Theatre 11 2.2 Background to the development of Musical Theatre 12 2.3 Characteristics of a musical 17 2.4 The Book Musical and the contribution of Richard Rodgers and Oscar 18 Hammerstein II 2.5 The development of the Concept Musical and the diffusion of the 19 Post-modern Musical 2.6 The elements of Musical Theatre 29 2.7 The development of South African Musical Theatre 34 2.7.1 Eurocentric Musicals in Apartheid South Africa 35 2.7.2 The home-grown musicals of
    [Show full text]