DOCSLIB.ORG

Field Labs in Action for Ebola Control in Sierra Leone

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Field Labs in Action for Ebola Control in Sierra Leone Infectious Diseases and Translational Medicine • Letter: Field Laboratory • Field labs in action for Ebola control in Sierra Leone Infect Dis Transl Med, 2015;1(01):2-5. DOI:10.11979/idtm.201501002 Dear Editor, To cope with the challenges of newly emerging or re- used to compare the proportion of confirmed EVD cases emerging infectious diseases, timely diagnosis is critical among total cases between Sierra Leone and Liberia. A for triage of suspected patients. The outbreak of Ebola- matched-pairs t-test was used to compare the number virus disease (EVD) in West Africa in late 2013 and the of confirmed EVD cases during the first three weeks of subsequent out-of-control situation compelled the World operation at the five laboratories with the previous three Health Organization (WHO) to declare the epidemic to weeks. The SPSS 18.0 software package for Windows be a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analy- (PHEIC)[1]. As of 8 February 2015, a total of 10, 958 ses. confirmed, probable, and suspected EVD cases with 3, LTWG of the Ministry of Health and Sanitation of 344 deaths had been reported by the Ministries of Health Sierra Leone coordinated the Ebola laboratory service and Sanitation of Sierra Leone. Ebola diagnostic labo- response through a special organization, the Director- ratories, supported by international partners, confirmed ates of Hospital and Laboratory Services and Disease 8, 149 cases (74.4%) and 2, 978 deaths (89.1%)[2]. Here Prevention and Control. The goal of the laboratory re- we highlight the critical role played by internationally sponse effort was to ensure a 24-hour turnaround time supported field labs during the Ebola outbreak in Sierra from initial collection of the specimen to result reporting. Leone. The LTWG also collaborated with the WHO and the US Ebola virus spreads primarily by direct contact with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in bodily fluids of patients who are experiencing obvious quality assurance by requesting laboratories to adhere to clinical symptoms, person-to-person transmission can be an external quality assessment (EQA)- proficiency test- prevented effectively by implementation of a combina- ing (PT) scheme that had been validated by the LTWG, tion of early diagnosis to ensure timely patient isolation which developed a manual of laboratory service response and care, contact tracing, infection control measures, and operations to guide specimen collection, packaging, and safe burial[3]. EVD was transmitted into Sierra Leone in dispatch. The manual also includes criteria for laboratory May 2014, at which time only the Kenema Government acceptance or rejection of specimens, as well as for dis- Hospital had research experiences with viral hemorrhag- semination of results. At the end of Jan. 2014, there were ic fever. Therefore, patients whose illness met the criteria 13 international laboratories in Sierra Leone that were defining a suspected Lassa fever case were referred to providing confirmatory diagnostic services for EVD. this hospital for initial diagnosis and clinical care[4]. Due Before 6 Dec. 2014, there were only five laboratories, to the high incidence of nosocomial Ebola virus infec- including the US CDC lab in Bo city, the China CDC lab tion, the Sierra Leone government closed this hospital in Jui Hospital, the National Institute for Communicable in August of 2014[5]. As a result of this closure, the labo- Diseases (NICD) lab of South Africa in Lakka, the Pub- ratory diagnostic capability in Sierra Leone depended lic Health Agency Canada (PHAC) lab in Kailahun, and mainly on international support. the Public Health England (PHE) lab in Kerry Town (Fig. 1). The geographical locations of each of the laboratories Between 6 Dec. 2014 and 15 Jan. 30, 2015, eight other and the status of the sampling teams in Sierra Leone were laboratories were established in support of “Operation obtained from the National Laboratory Technical Work- Western Area Surge” (WAS), the effort initiated to help ing group (LTWG) of the Ministry of Health and Sani- control the epidemic. Of the six existing laboratories tation of Sierra Leone. The weekly statistics regarding in the Western Area, the region with the most affected confirmed EVD cases, total cases, and samples tested, hotspots, three are new, including the European Union- were obtained from the EVD situation report published supported and Nigerian-run lab at Kingtom, the Euro- by the Ministry of Health and Sanitation of Sierra Leone pean Mobile (EM) Lab at the Police Training School in (http://health.gov.sl/?page_id=583). The Directorate of Hastings, and the Italian lab in Goderich, as well as an Disease Prevention and Control of the Ministry of Health additional five new laboratories supported by England, and Sanitation of Sierra Leone provided the situation re- Canada, U.S.A., and Dutch that are located in Port Loko, ports that were missing from the website. These detailed Bombali, Tonkolili, Moyamba and Kono, regions which data are shown in Table 1. The Chi-square method was were expected to become new hotspots. 2 Infect Dis Transl Med 2015;1(01):2-5. Field labs in action for Ebola control in Sierra Leone Table 1 Numbers of confirmed EVD cases, total EVD cases, and samples tested, listed per epidemiological week in Sierra Leone. Number of confirmed number of total No. of samples Epi week date Week No. cases cases tested 26 May to 01 June 2014 22 18 58 58 02 to 08 June 2014 23 24 55 55 09 to 15 June 2014 24 34 80 80 16 to 22 June 2014 25 29 101 101 23 to 29 June 2014 26 36 89 89 30 June to 06 July 2014 27 63 119 130 07 to 13 July 2014 28 59 92 153 14 to 20 July 2014 29 29 93 122 21 to 27 July 2014 30 57 102 123 28 July to 03 August 2014 31 77 160 251 04 to 10 August 2014 32 95 124 207 11 to 17 August 2014 33 90 122 217 18 to 24 August 2014 34 137 217 293 25 to 31 August 2014 35 171 199 276 01 to 07 September 2014 36 181 210 329 08 to 14 September 2014 37 215 252 414 15 to 21 September 2014 38 254 301 510 22 to 28 September 2014 39 350 408 677 29 September to 05 October 2014 40 315 467 647 06 to 12 October 2014 41 371 468 842 13 to 19 October 2014 42 386 496 987 20 to 26 October 2014 43 399 471 1092 27 October to 02 November 2014 44 435 540 1272 03 to 09 November 2014 45 421 543 1419 10 to 16 November 2014 46 533 705 1912 17 to 23 November 2014 47 385 526 1690 24 to 30 November 2014 48 537 713 2042 1 to 7 December 2014 49 397 585 1870 8 to 14 December 2014 50 327 459 1721 15 to 21 December 2014 51 315 440 1986 22 to 28 December 2014 52 337 442 2159 29 December 2014 to 04 January 2015 53 252 421 2574 05 to 11 January 2015 54 191 294 2131 Field laboratories play a critical role in providing rapid year of field lab operation in multiple countries. Never diagnosis of emerging infections and implementation of before has the role of field labs been so crucial as it has specific control and prevention countermeasures[6-8]. Field been during the EVD responses in Sierra Leone. Figure laboratory scientists have done essential work in de- 2 depicts a timeline of EVD cases and the laboratory di- ployed laboratories, providing crucial help with the con- agnostic services that facilitated timely triage of patients trol efforts in West Africa. However, some governments and hence the implementation of effective EVD control are worried about the possibility of importing EVD cases and prevention countermeasures. by sending scientists to epidemic areas where they risk According to the WHO Ebola situation report of 8 infection. Professor Tim Inglis, a medical microbiolo- February 2015[2], confirmed EVD cases accounted for gist at the University of Western Australia in Nedlands, 74.4% of the total cases in Sierra Leone, a much higher who is experienced in working in the deployable lab, percent than in Liberia (35.9%) (P < 0.001). Since the appealed that, “Developed nations must not fear sending EVD outbreak began in May 2014 in Sierra Leone, a Ebola help”[9]. There has not been an EVD case reported total of 13 laboratories have been involved in EVD di- among field laboratory personnel after more than a half- agnostic testing in this country. The arrival of additional 3 Infectious Diseases and Translational Medicine Figure 1. Geographical locations of 11 Ebola laboratories in Sierra Leone with capacity to provide laboratory diagnostic services for con- firmation of EVD cases as of 15 Feb., 2015. Figure 2. Numbers of confirmed EVD cases, total EVD cases, and samples tested, depicted by epidemiological week. Data are accord- ing to the Sierra Leone country situation report. The following laboratories are represented: a, Kenema Government Hospital Lab; b, US Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Lab, Kenema; 1, Public Health Agency Canada (PHAC) Lab, Kailahun; 2, US-CDC Lab, Bo City; 3, South African National Institute for Communicable Diseases (NICD) Lab, Lakka; 4, China-CDC Lab, Jui; 5, Public Health England (PHE) Lab, Kerry Town; 6, PHE Lab, Port Loko; 7, PHE Lab, Makeni; 8, Nigerian Lab, Kingtom; 9, Italian Lab, Goderich; 10, PHAC Lab, Maguraka; 11, EM Lab, Hastings; 12, US Lab, Moyamba; 13, Dutch Lab, Kono. The gray arrow represents the date of first testing for two laboratories that are no longer operational.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Ebola Synthesis Reference Document August 2017
    Ebola Synthesis Reference Document August 2017 The IFRC is committed to upholding its Framework for Evaluation. The framework is designed to promote reliable, useful, ethical evaluations that contribute to organizational learning, accountability, and our mission to best serve those in need. It demonstrates the IFRC’s commitment to transparency, providing a publicly accessible document to all stakeholders so that they may better understand and participate in the evaluation function. International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies (IFRC) Case postale 372 1211 Genève 19 Suisse Tel: +41 22 730 4222 Fax: +41 22 733 0395 http://www.ifrc.org/MandE Africa Regional Office Woodlands Road, off Dennis Pritt Road | P. O. Box 41275, 00100 | Nairobi | Kenya. Tel: +254 202835000 Fax: +254202712777 Find out more on www.ifrc.org/africa Acknowledgement This synthesis reference document was prepared by Steve Powell, IFRC consultant, with support and editorial review by IFRC staff, Dr. Adeiza Ben Adinoyi, Gabriel Pictet, Amanda McClelland and Josse Gillijns. Thanks are owed to the individuals within the Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement and partner organization who gave their input into the background documents for this report. 2 | Key to coloured highlighting: Findings Analyses Lessons Contents Executive Summary ......................................................................... 8 Purpose, scope, background ........................................................ 11 Purpose .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ebola Outbreak – Monthly Overview April
    ACAPS: Ebola Outbreak – Monthly Overview April 4 May 2015 Ebola continues to have a negative impact on food security and livelihoods. The recovery of markets and trade should be supported by the lifting of movement Ebola Outbreak restrictions and reopening of borders. Household (HH) incomes remain below average across the region, due to decreased employment opportunities. Weak Monthly Overview April purchasing power is expected to be the main driver of food insecurity. Need for international Not required Low Moderate Significant Urgent assistance X Key Findings Insignificant Minor Moderate Significant Major Expected impact X Anticipated scope and Health systems continue to struggle to provide non-Ebola care. Crisis Overview ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Capacity remains limited and fear of Ebola is still preventing scale Key Findings ............................................................................................................................................... 1 people from seeking healthcare. Regional ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 Outbreaks of infectious diseases, such as measles, are being Guinea ........................................................................................................................................................ 5 reported in the three most affected countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of the West African Ebola Virus Disease Outbreak on Food Security
    Impact of the West African Ebola Virus Disease Outbreak on Food security Anne- Claire THOMAS Tharcisse NKUNZIMANA A n a P EREZ HOYOS François KAYITAKIRE D e c e m b e r 2014 European Commission Joint Research Centre Institute for Environment and Sustainability Contact information François Kayitakire Address: Joint Research Centre Via Fermi, 2749 / TP266 21027 Ispra (VA), Italy E-mail: [email protected] Tel.: +: +39 0332786580 https://ec.europa.eu/jrc Legal Notice This publication is a Science and Policy Report by the Joint Research Centre, the European Commission’s in-house science service. It aims to provide evidence-based scientific support to the European policy-making process. The scientific output expressed does not imply a policy position of the European Commission. Neither the European Commission nor any person acting on behalf of the Commission is responsible for the use which might be made of this publication. © European Union, 2014 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Main Conclusions . The exceptional extent and duration of the 2014 Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) outbreak in West Africa has had significant adverse effects on food security in Guinea, Sierra Leone and Liberia, the countries most affected. Despite these adverse effects on food security, food availability is not expected to be significantly reduced on average compared to a normal year. Overall production in affected countries is expected to decline slightly, essentially because of labour shortages. In addition, all borders other than the Guinea-Senegal border had been re-opened by the end of November 2014. Food imports may thus resume and food availability may improve starting December 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Impacts of Ebola on Firms in Sierra Leone
    Final report The economic impacts of Ebola on firms in Sierra Leone Katherine Casey Rachel Glennerster Tavneet Suri April 2017 When citing this paper, please use the title and the following reference number: F-39204-SLE-1 Project Report: The Economic Impacts of Ebola on Firms in Sierra Leone1 Katherine Casey Rachel Glennerster Tavneet Suri Stanford GSB MIT J-PAL MIT Sloan [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] 1. Introduction and Motivation In 2014, Sierra Leone was hit by the emergence of Ebola, a deadly and terrifying disease. In an effort to control the spread of the disease, national and international agencies took drastic action: land borders were closed; several international airlines stopped service to the country; cordons were placed around particularly affected districts; schools were closed for nine months; and bars, nightclubs and restaurants were restricted for over a year. The economic consequences of the fear and disruption caused by the outbreak have been hard to estimate, not least because Sierra Leone simultaneously suffered a reduction in the price of iron ore, one of its main exports. Few would contest, however, that the economic impacts were substantial. In previous work, we used nationally representative household surveys to document how hours worked fell for those in informal employment and that nonfarm household businesses were badly hit during the worst of the crisis (Fu et al., 2015). However, little is known about how formal sector firms reacted to the crisis. As in other low income countries, formal sector firms represent a relatively small fraction of employment in Sierra Leone (91% of the labor force is self-employed), but a much higher proportion of taxes and exports (corporate tax alone makes up 11% of tax revenues).
    [Show full text]
  • Fears and Misperceptions of the Ebola Response System During the 2014-2015 Outbreak in Sierra Leone
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Fears and Misperceptions of the Ebola Response System during the 2014-2015 Outbreak in Sierra Leone Thespina Yamanis1,2*, Elisabeth Nolan1, Susan Shepler1 1 School of International Service, American University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America, 2 Center on Health, Risk and Society, American University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America * [email protected], [email protected] a11111 Abstract Background OPEN ACCESS Future infectious disease epidemics are likely to disproportionately affect countries with Citation: Yamanis T, Nolan E, Shepler S (2016) weak health systems, exacerbating global vulnerability. To decrease the severity of epi- Fears and Misperceptions of the Ebola Response demics in these settings, lessons can be drawn from the Ebola outbreak in West Africa. System during the 2014-2015 Outbreak in Sierra There is a dearth of literature on public perceptions of the public health response system Leone. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 10(10): e0005077. that required citizens to report and treat Ebola cases. Epidemiological reports suggested doi:10.1371/journal.pntd.0005077 that there were delays in diagnosis and treatment. The purpose of our study was to explore Editor: Matthew Kasper, Armed Forces Health the barriers preventing Sierra Leoneans from trusting and using the Ebola response system Surveillance Center, UNITED STATES during the height of the outbreak. Received: February 25, 2016 Accepted: September 27, 2016 Methods Published: October 18, 2016 Using an experienced ethnographer, we conducted 30 semi-structured in-depth interviews Copyright: © 2016 Yamanis et al. This is an open in public spaces in Ebola-affected areas. Participants were at least age 18, spoke Krio, and access article distributed under the terms of the reported no contact in the recent 21 days with an Ebola-infected person.
    [Show full text]
  • Briefing Note West Africa Ebola
    ACAPS Briefing Note EBOLA OUTBREAK IN SIERRA LEONE DATE: 26 June 2014 Insignificant Minor Moderate Important Major Priorities for humanitarian interventions in the coming weeks Expected impact X Immediate needs include qualified medical staff, the organisation of training on how to treat Ebola, and increasing number of contact tracing and awareness-raising Need for international Not required Low Moderate Important Urgent activities among the population. There is need for socioeconomic and psychological assistance x support to cases, their families and communities. There is social disruption and stigma associated with the illness. Most of the people affected by Ebola in Sierra Leone are women, as they are the ones who take care of sick family members, Crisis overview deceased and relatives. An Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) outbreak, which started in Guinea in early 2014, Humanitarian constraints has now spread to Liberia and Sierra Leone. As of 23 June, the total cumulative The upcoming rainy season is expected to hamper humanitarian access. number of cases reported in the three countries was 635 out of which 399 died, a Case Fatality Rate (CFR) of 62.8%. (WHO, 25/06/2014). Ebola patients Need for humanitarian assistance have been identified in more than 60 separate locations across the three There is an urgent need to intensify response efforts, and to promote cross-border countries, complicating efforts to treat patients and curb the outbreak (MSF, collaboration and information sharing (WHO 25/06/2014). Bringing the epidemic under 25/06/2014). control will require a massive deployment of resources by governments in West Africa and aid organisations (MSF 24/06/2014).
    [Show full text]
  • Magnitude of Ebola Relative to Other Causes of Death in Liberia, Sierra
    Correspondence Magnitude of Ebola We used the most recent (2013) In Liberia, for virtually all model relative to other causes national estimates of non-EVD parameters, EVD deaths exceeded the mortality,2,7 together with projections expected number of deaths due to of death in Liberia, of population growth, to calculate the the leading non-EVD cause of death Sierra Leone, and Guinea expected number of deaths from non- (fi gure). In Sierra Leone, a broad range EVD causes in Liberia, Sierra Leone, and of model parameters also indicated With more than 20 000 cases reported, Guinea in 2014. For all combinations that EVD might have killed more the outbreak of Ebola virus disease of model parameters, we mapped how people in 2014 than the leading non- (EVD) in west Africa is by far the largest the estimated number of EVD deaths EVD cause of death (ie, malaria). In in recorded history. Despite the scale ranked relative to the expected number other sets of model parameters, EVD of the current outbreak, EVD is often of deaths from non-EVD causes. still killed more people than the second perceived as a “small-scale killer”.1 By comparison, malaria caused an Liberia Sierra Leone Guinea estimated 854 000 deaths world wide 2·5 2 10k 15k in 2013. However, although limited 5k at the global level, the impact of EVD on mortality could be substantial in 10k countries with intense transmission. We thus aimed to compare EVD with 2·0 other causes of death in Liberia, Sierra Leone, and Guinea in 2014.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of the Ebola Virus Disease Outbreak on Market Chains And
    FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Dakar, 2016 The conclusions given in this information product are considered appropriate at the time of its preparation. They may be mod- ified in the light of further knowledge gained at subsequent stages of the project. In particular, the recommendations included in this information product were valid at the time they were written, during the FAO workshop on the market chains and trade of agricultural products in the context of the Ebola virus disease outbreak in West Africa, organized in December 2014 in Dakar, Senegal. The views expressed in this information product are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not men- tioned. ISBN 978-92-5-109223-1 © FAO, 2016 FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise in- dicated, material may be copied, downloaded and printed for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in any way.
    [Show full text]
  • After Ebola: Why and How Capacity Support to Sierra Leone's Health
    Researching livelihoods and services affected by conflict After Ebola: why and how capacity support to Sierra Leone’s health sector needs to change Report 7 Lisa Denney and Richard Mallett with Ramatu Jalloh June 2015 Written by Lisa Denney and Richard Mallett with Ramatu Jalloh SLRC reports present information, analysis and key policy recommendations on issues relating to livelihoods, basic services and social protection in conflict affected situations. This and other SLRC reports are available from www.securelivelihoods. org. Funded by DFID, Irish Aid and the EC. Disclaimer: The views presented in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of DFID, Irish Aid, the EC, SLRC or our partners SLRC reports present information, analysis on issues relating to livelihoods, basic services and social protection in conflict affected situations. This and other SLRC reports are available from www.securelivelihoods.org. ©SLRC 2015. Readers are encouraged to quote or reproduce material from SLRC for their own publications. As copyright holder SLRC, requests due acknowledgement and a copy of the publication. Secure Livelihoods Research Consortium Overseas Development Institute (ODI) 203 Blackfriars Road London SE1 8NJ United Kingdom T +44 (0)20 7922 8249 F +44 (0)20 7922 0399 E [email protected] www.securelivelihoods.org Researching livelihoods and services affected by conflict i About us Secure Livelihoods Research Consortium (SLRC) aims to generate a stronger evidence base on how people make a living, educate their children, deal with illness and access other basic services in conflict-affected situations (CAS). Providing better access to basic services, social protection and support to livelihoods matters for the human welfare of people affected by conflict, the achievement of development targets such as the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and international efforts at peace- and state-building.
    [Show full text]
  • WFP Sierra Leone | Brief
    WFP Sierra Leone | Brief Reporting period: 01 April – 30 June Country Director: Gon Myers COUNTRY STRATEGY WFP’s regional Emergency Operation (EMOP) focuses on food and nutritional support under three pillars – care, Brief contain, protect – to support the health response in | bringing Sierra Leone to an Ebola free status. The regional Special Operation augments the capacity of the humanitarian response by providing logistics, engineering, air service, coordination, and telecommunications support to enhance the efficiency of the humanitarian response. The Country Programme (CP, currently on hold) focused on school feeding, supplementary feeding for vulnerable populations and livelihood support; targeted support to HIV patients is ongoing. WFP has been present in Sierra Leone since 1968. Sierra Leone Sierra OPERATIONS WFP 6 Months Planned Total Total Total Project Net Funding number requirements received Funded Top 5 Donors Duration Requirements of people (in USD) (in USD) (%) (in USD)* Japan, Republic of CP 200336 Jan 2013 – Sierra Leone, UK, Country Programme 337,382* 45,388,138 2,343,947 European Dec 2015 35,481,917 78% Sierra Leone (2013- Commission, 2015) Multilateral EMOP 200761.SL USA, Republic of Support to Sierra Leone, Populations in Areas Aug 2014 – Canada, 1,473,675 65,499,329** n/a n/a 2,694,772 Affected by the Germany, UN Sept 2015 Ebola Outbreak in CERF Guinea, Liberia, and Sierra Leone SO 200773.SL UN Common Logistics Common Funds & Agencies Services for the (excl. CERF), Oct 2014 – Humanitarian n/a 76,557,478** n/a n/a n/a USA, Republic of Community’s Dec 2015 Sierra Leone, Response to the Germany, Ebola outbreak in European West Africa Commission *July – December, **Sierra Leone part of the Regional Ebola Response Project only Summary of WFP assistance WFP’s Emergency Operation is focused on supporting the health response to stop the spread of the Ebola Virus Disease (EVD) by meeting the basic food and nutrition needs of affected families and communities in Sierra Leone.
    [Show full text]
  • Part I: Results Achieved
    8 PART I: RESULTS ACHIEVED The government of Liberia, WFP and WorldBank deliver rice, cereal and USAID vegetable oil to an Ebola-quarantined household in Monrovia. The 7 people living in the house had been quarantined since March 1 were medically monitored for 21 days and received psycho social counselling. Photo: World Bank/Dominic Chavez PHASE ONE: TAKING THE HEAT OUT OF THE OUTBREAK At the height of the outbreak between August and October 2014, hundreds of people were getting sick and dying each week. Until this time, national and international partners, including frontline non-governmental actors, particularly Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), members of the UN country teams and the UN Mission in Liberia (UNMIL), had been active on the ground in responding to the outbreak, but the growth in transmission continued to outpace response capacity. Significantly more financial resources, trained medical personnel and clinical capacities were needed to rise to the challenge. On 29 August 2014, the Presidents of Guinea, Liberia and Sierra Leone jointly wrote to the Secretary-General, requesting a UN resolution on a comprehensive response to the Ebola outbreak and calling for the United Nations to take the lead in coordinating the international response. In response to this letter, and with the unwavering support of the General Assembly, on 17 September, the Secretary-General informed the General Assembly of his intent to establish the United Nations Mission for Ebola Emergency Response (UNMEER), which deployed to the region ten days later with the objective of supporting the scaling up of the UN system in response to this unprecedented outbreak.
    [Show full text]
  • NCP Were Developed Using the NCSH Reference While the Text Reflects the Newer 2006 WHO Standards
    Comprehensive Africa Agriculture Development Programme (CAADP) West Africa Regional CAADP Nutrition Program Development Workshop Nutrition Country Paper – Sierra Leone English Version DRAFT November 9-12, 2011 Dakar, Senegal This synthesis has been elaborated for a CAADP workshop on the integration of nutrition in National Agricultural and Food Security Investment Plan, held in Dakar, Senegal, from the 9th to the 12th November 2011. The purpose of this Nutrition Country Paper is to present key data and information required to improve nutrition in participating countries and scale up nutrition in agricultural strategies and programs. This work document has been initiated and updated by the workshop work team of the country, composed of focal points from different sectors; with the assistance of the technical piloting committee. It will be regularly updated and completed. Key policy documents to be consulted Other key documents: Please refer to the workshop material - National Sustainable Agriculture Development Plan NSADP/CAADP (2010-2030) - The National Food and Nutrition Policy - An Agenda for Change : National PRS II (2008-2012) General sources used to produce this document Sources Information Lien internet Nutrition Country Profiles http://www.fao.org/ag/agn/nutrition/profiles_by_country_en.stm FAO FAO Country profiles http://www.fao.org/countries/ FAO STAT country profiles http://faostat.fao.org/site/666/default.aspx Nutrition Country Profiles http://www.childinfo.org/profiles_974.htm UNICEF MICS: Multiple Indicators Cluster Surveys
    [Show full text]