The Myth of the Absolute-Return Investor M

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Myth of the Absolute-Return Investor M Financial Analysts Journal Volume 62 • Number 2 ©2006, CFA Institute PERSPECTIVES The Myth of the Absolute-Return Investor M. Barton Waring and Laurence B. Siegel n meetings with clients and colleagues in the both sensible and true to the sense of the term past few years, we have noticed that many eluded us. That experience further piqued our otherwise hardheaded and clear-eyed inves- interest in the idea. I tors are excited about “absolute return” So, let us explore the term a bit. It is widely investing. The notion is spreading like wildfire. used, and because words are chosen to a purpose, Many institutional investors have already added, one can find some of that purpose by observing the or are planning to add, an absolute-return “asset context in which a term is used. class” to their policy mix. At a time when pension One important bit of context is that the word funds, foundations, and endowments are under pair “absolute return” has been used most by those pressure to increase their investment returns, abso- managers who resist the practical and theoretical lute-return investing is often positioned as The successes of relative-return investing and who are Answer—with enthusiasts arguing that it will do a looking for terminology that supports their rebel- better job of meeting institutional return require- lious spirit. The term captures this spirit: If ments than other types of investing. benchmark-relative investing is considered inade- The concept seems to have struck a special quate or wimpy by these rebels, then absolute- chord with those who have struggled to fully accept return investing implies that managers can take the the perceived confines of benchmark-relative opposite approach, one that is not benchmark rel- investing. If you have never really understood why ative. (Real men do not use benchmarks!) all investing is, in the end, relative-return investing, What does it mean to be opposite in spirit to then the notion that absolute returns might be supe- relative-return investing? We surveyed websites to rior seems to make good sense. see how investments that are purportedly absolute- Alas, we fear we have disclosed our conclusion return investments are portrayed. Not surpris- in the title, and we have more than a mild suspicion ingly, many of the descriptions are cagey; the web- that our bias shows in this introduction. So what is sites simply use the term without precisely defining absolute-return investing? What is wrong with it; what they mean by it. But some sites are less from where does our skepticism spring? Is there guarded, particularly those outside the United something valuable and redeemable in the concept, States. Here are some samples. and if so, what is it? The first is taken from a well-known financial pundit writing for SmartMoney.com:1 Why Absolute-Return Investing Is But when the bubble burst, and indeed up until this year, simply staying above water has a Myth been perceived as commendable. In fact, The first question is: Just what are “absolute” plenty of managers have boasted of their good returns? We originally assumed we could start this “relative” performance, having lost only sin- gle digits, for example, at a time in which the essay by simply reporting an agreed definition of S&P 500 index was down significantly more. the term “absolute-return investing.” Instead, we Of course, I don’t know many groceries that found ourselves repeatedly offering up ideas to can be bought using good “relative” perfor- each other for what the definition would have to be mance, if that performance . happens to be for the term to make sense. Definitions that were negative. I don’t have a degree in economics, only a stack of bills to be paid. So I start, perhaps naively so, with the basic notion that a M. Barton Waring is managing director and head of the good year is one in which I make money—end Client Advisory Group at Barclays Global Investors, of story. My benchmark might be low, but it’s San Francisco. Laurence B. Siegel is director of research very strict. A good return is a positive return, in the Investment Division of The Ford Foundation, even at a relatively low level. In hedge-fund New York City. speak, it’s what we call absolute return. 14 www.cfapubs.org ©2006, CFA Institute The Myth of the Absolute-Return Investor Here is another, from Macquarie Bank, that Definition and Importance of 2 emphasizes higher-than-market, positive returns: Relative Returns Absolute return investments can offer you potential benefits such as: If absolute returns are supposed to be different from—and better than—relative returns, perhaps a •the potential for higher returns than tradi- place to start is with a discussion of relative returns. tional asset classes Beginning in 1963, Sharpe laid the foundation for •the potential to achieve positive returns when how investment professionals understand and traditional share markets are falling— 5 because they often adopt hedging strategies. decompose total returns on portfolios today. His And another, to the same point, from the Aus- work showed how the total return on any portfolio— tralian Stock Exchange:3 note the emphasis—can be decomposed into a part that is ascribable to the return on the market bench- Absolute return funds have the ability to mark, which he called “beta,” and an idiosyncratic— produce positive investment returns regard- in this case, manager-specific—part that is uncorre- less of general market conditions. The strate- lated with the market, which he called “alpha” (plus gies they adopt can produce returns in both 6 rising and falling markets. the risk-free rate, or cash, of course). In the slightly condensed form popularized by These quotations are consistent with the notion Grinold and Kahn (2000a), this relationship is of providing a return pattern that is different in expressed as spirit from those of relative-return investments. If a definition could be teased out of these statements, rp = βprbm + αp. it might be that absolute returns are positive (as in To restate the equation in plain English, the excess absolute value) and always (or at least mostly) bet- return of a manager’s portfolio (excess over the ter than the market. The idea appears to be that, as riskless rate), rp, is the expected beta of that portfo- a result of these combined attributes, the total return lio, βp, multiplied by the excess return of the man- from absolute-return investing will have less down- ager’s normal portfolio or custom benchmark, rbm side risk and more upside return than the total (that is, the risk premium), plus an alpha (or resid- return produced in a relative-return environment. ual term), αp, that is uncorrelated with the beta Many readers of this article will have already return. rejected this expansive approach to defining abso- Sharpe’s observation is perhaps the most pro- lute returns and will have worked to come up with found insight in modern finance. The return on any, their own more sensible and less rebellious defini- repeat any, portfolio consists of a market part and tion. We will offer our own view later—a view that a nonmarket part. In the jargon of finance, this idea will give some comfort to many of those sensible is often abbreviated to simply: A portfolio has a readers. But our view is stronger: We do not sup- part that is beta and a part that is alpha. port continued use of the term. The beta part results from the average future Of course, we would not disagree that a return exposure to total market returns, often expressed in pattern that beats the market in rising markets and terms of one or more market benchmarks. This mix that does not lose money in falling markets would of exposures is sometimes called a “normal portfo- 4 be a good thing—if it really existed ex ante. (And lio.” Most long-only managers know with relative as you will see, something like it can exist—but it clarity what their normal portfolios are; simple, is not an absolute return.) single-factor examples are large-cap value and One more bit of context: Today, the term “abso- fixed-income credit. (Other, more complex exam- lute return” seems to be used most often to describe ples are also possible.) For a purported absolute- what wealthy individual investors have always return manager, the normal portfolio may not have called hedge funds. Perhaps the term is thought to been purposefully or thoughtfully designed—and give more legitimacy or sophistication to the hedge may be more implicit than explicit—but some- fund approach in the institutional context. But where in the manager’s investment style lies a absolute-return investing is really a more general “home,” a set of factor exposures or betas that the term, and it has been applied to alternative strate- manager goes to when he or she has no reason to gies other than hedge funds as well as to certain go somewhere else. conventional long-only managers (particularly Therefore, the notion that every return has a those with concentrated portfolios that bear little beta component and an alpha component applies resemblance to their benchmarks). Here, we focus to any portfolio—that is, to a portfolio with any on hedge funds because that is where the interest normal portfolio or benchmark, including complex is today. multifactor benchmarks. A portfolio that normally March/April 2006 www.cfapubs.org 15 Financial Analysts Journal contains multiple asset classes (or a fixed-income absolute-return investors: Is the expected return portfolio) could thus be analyzed within the same you offer investors attributable to
Recommended publications
  • Pension Fund Investment in Hedge Funds", OECD Working Papers on Insurance and Private Pensions, No
    Please cite this paper as: Stewart, F. (2007), "Pension Fund Investment in Hedge Funds", OECD Working Papers on Insurance and Private Pensions, No. 12, OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/086456868358 OECD Working Papers on Insurance and Private Pensions No. 12 Pension Fund Investment in Hedge Funds Fiona Stewart* JEL Classification: G11, G18, G23, J31 *OECD, France PENSION FUND INVESTMENT IN HEDGE FUNDS Fiona Stewart September 2007 OECD WORKING PAPER ON INSURANCE AND PRIVATE PENSIONS No. 12 ——————————————————————————————————————— Financial Affairs Division, Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2 Rue André Pascal, Paris 75116, France www.oecd.org/daf/fin www.oecd.org/daf/fin/wp 1 ABSTRACT/RÉSUMÉ Pension fund investment in hedge funds Having outlined the potential concerns relating to pension fund investment in hedge funds, the OECD carried out a survey to investigate what information pension fund regulators have on these investments and how they are being controlled. The survey confirms that pension fund regulators have little information regarding how pension funds in their jurisdiction are investing in hedge fund products (in terms of size of investments, the types of hedge funds pension funds are exposed and to what type of product). Only the Slovak Republic and Mexico (for the mandatory system) prevent pension funds from investing in hedge funds. Although the level of such investment is still very low in other countries, it is almost universally expected to increase. Few countries impose specific quantitative investment restrictions on pension fund investment in hedge funds, with most regulators exercising control via general investment restrictions and requirements (for diversification, transparency, through the prudent person rule etc.).
    [Show full text]
  • Securitization & Hedge Funds
    SECURITIZATION & HEDGE FUNDS: COLLATERALIZED FUND OBLIGATIONS SECURITIZATION & HEDGE FUNDS: CREATING A MORE EFFICIENT MARKET BY CLARK CHENG, CFA Intangis Funds AUGUST 6, 2002 INTANGIS PAGE 1 SECURITIZATION & HEDGE FUNDS: COLLATERALIZED FUND OBLIGATIONS TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................................ 3 PROBLEM.................................................................................................................................................... 4 SOLUTION................................................................................................................................................... 5 SECURITIZATION..................................................................................................................................... 5 CASH-FLOW TRANSACTIONS............................................................................................................... 6 MARKET VALUE TRANSACTIONS.......................................................................................................8 ARBITRAGE................................................................................................................................................ 8 FINANCIAL ENGINEERING.................................................................................................................... 8 TRANSPARENCY......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES SECURITIES and EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K X ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012 or TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number: 001-33294 Fortress Investment Group LLC _____________________ (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 20-5837959 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) or organization) 1345 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10105 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (212) 798-6100 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (b) of the Act: Title of each class: Name of exchange on which registered: Class A shares New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. X Yes No Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes X No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Absolute Return Review
    Absolute Return Review November 2, 2016 Prepared at the request of: Kentucky Retirement System Important Information This presentation constitutes client reporting, is considered confidential, proprietary and includes trade secret information and is intended solely for the receipt (“Kentucky Retirement System” or “KRS”) and is not for further distribution or public use. The data and information presented are for informational purposes only. The information contained herein should be treated in a confidential manner and may not be transmitted, reproduced or used in whole or in part for any other purpose, nor may it be disclosed without the prior written consent of Prisma Capital Partners LP (“KKR Prisma”) and Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P. (together with its affiliates, “KKR”). By accepting this material, the Recipient agrees not to distribute or provide this information to any other person. The information is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Confidential Private Placement Memorandum and Subscription Agreement of Prisma Spectrum Fund Ltd (the “Fund”), each as amended and/or restated from time to time (the “Fund Documents”). The interests in the Fund (the “Interests”) have not been approved or disapproved by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) or by the securities regulatory authority of any state or of any other jurisdiction. The Interests have not been registered under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), the securities laws of any other state or the securities laws of any other jurisdiction, nor is such registration contemplated. The Fund will not be registered as investment companies under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”).
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Letter to Our Co-Investors
    QUARTERLY LETTER TO OUR CO-INVESTORS OCTOBER 2019 OCTOBER 2019 Dear co-investor, We finish the third quarter of 2019, a period of continuity with respect to previous quarters, in which investors' money continues to flow towards certainty, at any price, and flees from the most illiquid and/or cyclical companies, despite the attractiveness of their valuation. This situation is causing an unsatisfactory relative (and absolute) return on our portfolios in the short term, but nevertheless contributes to generating great opportunities for appreciation in the long-term. At Horos it is clear to us that we must flee from the "fashionable", as comfortable as it may seem to follow them, because our main objective as managers (and co-investors) of our funds is to maximise returns (in the long term) while minimising the risk we incur. Periods like the present should not make us despair, nor call into question an investment process built with this sole objective in mind. From the fruits we are sowing (our potentials are at historical highs) we will reap the rewards. As always, I would like to take this opportunity to thank you, on behalf of the entire Horos team, for your trust. Yours sincerely, ı———ı Javier Ruiz, CFA CIO Horos Asset Management 1 The great evasion We have in effect put all our rotten eggs in one basket. And we intend to watch this basket carefully. - Von Luger, the Kommandant (Great Escape, 1963) In the last quarterly letter (read letter) we discuss how various factors may be contributing to the relative poor performance of our portfolios when compared to benchmarks.
    [Show full text]
  • MERITAGE CAPITAL, LLC 500 West 2Nd Street, Suite 1850 Austin, Texas 78701 Telephone
    FIRM BROCHURE MERITAGE CAPITAL, LLC 500 West 2nd Street, Suite 1850 Austin, Texas 78701 Telephone (512) 637.9700 Fax (512) 320.0594 [email protected] www.meritagecapital.com THIS BROCHURE PROVIDES INFORMATION ABOUT THE QUALIFICATIONS AND BUSINESS PRACTICES OF MERITAGE CAPITAL, LLC. IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS BROCHURE, PLEASE CONTACT US AT (512) 637.9700, OR BY EMAIL AT [email protected]. THE INFORMATION IN THIS BROCHURE HAS NOT BEEN APPROVED OR VERIFIED BY THE UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR BY ANY STATE SECURITIES AUTHORITY. THIS BROCHURE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER, SOLICITATION OR RECOMMENDATION TO SELL OR AN OFFER TO BUY ANY SECURITIES, INVESTMENT PRODUCTS OR INVESTMENT ADVISORY SERVICES. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT MERITAGE CAPITAL, LLC ALSO IS AVAILABLE ON THE SEC’S WEBSITE AT WWW.ADVISERINFO.SEC.GOV. March 30, 2020 Item 2: Material Changes This Item 2 discusses material changes that are made to this brochure since the last update of our Brochure dated October 14, 2019. There have been no material changes from the last update to the Brochure. The information set forth in this brochure is qualified in its entirety by the applicable offering materials and/or governing or account documents. In the event of a conflict between the information set forth in this brochure and the information in the applicable governing, account and/or offering documents, such documents will control. We encourage all clients and investors to carefully review this document
    [Show full text]
  • In the “Lost Decade,” Institutions Berkshire Capital Securities LLC Embrace Hedge Funds Is a Privately-Owned Investment for Most of the 1990S, While the U.S
    www.berkcap.com | NEWSLETTER | 1st Quarter 2008 NEW YORK | DENVER | LONDON In the “Lost Decade,” Institutions Berkshire Capital Securities LLC Embrace Hedge Funds is a privately-owned investment For most of the 1990s, while the U.S. stock market was in the midst of one of the bank that provides merger, greatest bull runs in history, West Virginia’s state pension plan managers watched acquisition, valuation and from the sidelines, their inaction the legacy of 19th-century rules that prohibited strategic advisory services public funds from investing in equities. Having played catch-up when the ban was to clients focused in the lifted in 1997, the state is moving far more rapidly to embrace alternatives: last investment management and year, the legislature gave the West Virginia Investment Management Board approval securities industries. Since to invest up to 20% of its $8.9 billion portfolio in such assets, including hedge 1983, Berkshire Capital funds. has completed over 220 West Virginia is hardly alone. Throughout the U.S., and indeed the world, pension transactions (with AUM transfer funds, endowments, insurance companies, banks and other institutions are of over $400 billion and an expanding their holdings of alternative investments. In part, this reflects a sea aggregate value of nearly change in investment philosophy. Amid what the Wall Street Journal recently called $10 billion) and over 185 the “lost decade” for stocks, alternatives are increasingly viewed as a prudent valuations, strategic reviews component in a diversified portfolio, not a heart-thumping roll of the dice. and fairness opinions. Among the largest institutional players, public employee pension plans, that _____________________________ conversion is also driven by a pressing financial reality: the need to fund the commitments made to retiring baby boomers.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 7 Minutes of the PRIM Real Estate and Timberland Committee Meeting Wednesday, November 1, 2017 Committee Members Prese
    Minutes of the PRIM Real Estate and Timberland Committee Meeting Wednesday, November 1, 2017 Committee members present: Committee members not present: • Jill S. Hatton, CRE, Chair • Treasurer Deborah Goldberg • Sarah Kim, Esq., Treasurer Goldberg’s • Jack Lutz, Ph.D. designee. • Peter O’Connell • Lydia Chesnick, Esq. • Robert Gifford • Anthony E. Hubbard, Esq. • William F. McCall, Jr., CRE • Garlan Morse, Jr., CRE • Carly Rose The PRIM Real Estate and Timberland Committee meeting was called to order at 9:36 a.m. Committee Chair Jill S. Hatton, CRE, began by praising PRIM’s staff work on the Mass+Main development in Cambridge. I. Approval of the Minutes (Voting Item) The PRIM Real Estate and Timberland Committee unanimously approved the minutes of the May 8, 2017 and August 2, 2017 meetings. II. Executive Director/Chief Investment Officer Comments Michael G. Trotsky, CFA, Executive Director and Chief Investment Officer, comments to the Committee included: The September quarter was strong, and despite the frequent weather and political storms affecting the United States, the overall economy is little changed since the last Board meeting. Economic indicators are still mostly strong, equity markets continue to move higher, to new records, while bond yields remain low and inflation is absent. The overall health of the economy remained on an upswing, even while several economic indicators were affected by the storms. National employment measures, automobile sales, retail sales and home building statistics all exhibited anomalies in the quarter, but are expected to rebound. More important, the September 2017 quarterly Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth came in at 3%, annualized, beating expectations of 2.5% and only slightly below the 3.1% reported in the June 2017 quarter, which was revised upward.
    [Show full text]
  • 2Q 2017 Quarterly Commentary
    2Q 2017 4/1/2017 to 6/30/2017 Dow Jones 3.95% S&P 500 3.09% NASDAQ 4.16% Russell 2000 2.46% MSCI EAFE 6.12% QUARTERLY COMMENTARY July 2017 “The inherent irony of the efficient market theory is that the more people believe in it and correspondingly shun active management, the more inefficient the market is likely to become.” — Seth Karman – The Baupost Group Dear Friends and Clients, About once every decade I lament the day in college when I finished reading “The Intelligent Investor” by Benjamin Graham, and it clicked as I became an investor devoted to seeking “value.” Well, here I am again, feeling like momentum investors are having all the fun as my patience wears thin waiting for securities that we believe are both safe and cheap. Currently, most of the equity markets appear neither cheap nor safe to us. The momentum investors who are the current subject of my envy seem to only care that prices are going up, downside be damned, and pithy market aphorisms like “Don’t fight the Fed” and “BTFD” (buy the – uh, friendly dip) have worked out swimmingly for the last several years. To me, much of what I am observing in the equity markets is indicative of this momentum mindset, and frankly, why trend-following can work so well at times. I accuse most investors of “buying high and selling low” or, in the immortal words of the humorist Will Rogers, “Don’t gamble; take all your savings and buy some good stock and hold it till it goes up, then sell it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cambridge Commentary
    THE CAMBRIDGE COMMENTARY A Review of M&A Activity in the Investment Management Industry During 2017 January 1, 2018 780 Third Avenue, 7 th Floor, New York, NY 10017 (212) 826‐8290 www.cambintl.com CAMBRIDGE INTERNATIONAL PARTNERS provides top‐ quality M&A advisory services to the global investment management industry. We use our two‐plus decades of specialist experience and contacts to find, develop and structure lasting corporate relationships for our clients. We have over 25 years of experience providing transactional and related advice to the investment management industry. While based in New York, a significant portion of our business is derived from cross‐border or foreign transactions. Our extensive calling program keeps us current with managers and financial institutions globally. Cambridge prides itself on the objective, conflict‐free advice provided to clients. Our advice is untainted by investment activities and, as a member of FINRA, we follow the highest standards of compliance. Our experienced partners, who are also the owners of the firm, are fully engaged throughout the course of every assignment we undertake. John H. Temple David W. Abbott President Managing Director (212) 829‐8292 (212) 826‐8293 [email protected] [email protected] Richard H. Haywood, Jr. Managing Director (212) 826‐8294 [email protected] th 780 Third Avenue, 7 Floor, New York, NY 10017 (212) 826‐8290 www.cambintl.com A Review of M&A Activity in the Investment Management Industry During 2017 Strong equity markets and synchronized equity purchases, accounting for about growth in major economies characterized 20% of global transaction volume and 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • Fixed Income Absolute Return Fund Semi-Annual Report
    Putnam Fixed Income Absolute Return Fund Semiannual report 4 | 30 | 21 Absolute return funds are designed for a wide range of investors and pursue positive returns with less volatility over time than more traditional funds. FUND SYMBOL CLASS A PTRNX Putnam Fixed Income Absolute Return Fund Semiannual report 4 | 30 | 21 Message from the Trustees 1 Interview with your fund’s portfolio manager 3 Your fund’s performance 8 Your fund’s expenses 10 Consider these risks before investing 12 Terms and definitions 13 Other information for shareholders 15 Financial statements 16 Message from the Trustees June 11, 2021 Dear Fellow Shareholder: With summer at hand, it’s worth asking whether the economy has returned to normal. More than half of the 50 states have lifted pandemic-related restrictions. First-quarter growth in U.S. gross domestic product was 6%, reflecting a return nearly to pre-pandemic levels of economic output. The global economy is a different story. Beyond our shores, many nations lag the United States in vaccination rates and business activity. While there are reasons to feel some relief, it’s important to recognize what may be a new normal. The pandemic is not in the past, and many of the changes precipitated by it could last. During this time, dynamic, well-managed companies have adapted to seize new, more sustainable growth opportunities. Putnam’s active philosophy is well suited to this time. Putnam’s investment teams are analyzing companies, industries, consumers, and even governments. They try to understand the fundamentals of what has stayed the same and what has changed to uncover valuable investment insights or potential risks.
    [Show full text]
  • Absolute Return Strategies
    REPRINTED FROM NOVEMBER 19, 2007 Absolute Return Strategies WILLIAM E. FLAIG JR., Chief Investment Officer at Arrow Investment Advisors, LLC, joined the firm in February 2007. He spent five years at Rydex Investments, working as Director of Portfolio Management, in which he managed the entire portfolio team. While at Rydex, Mr. Flaig defined the concept of hedge fund replication, initiated the research and investment strategies on which the Rydex Absolute Return Strategies Fund and the Rydex Hedge Equity Fund are based, and directed those strategies. He also developed best practices for creating leverage within the constraints of a mutual fund offering unlimited trading. Prior to Rydex, he spent six years at Bankers Trust Company in a range of roles including currency trading, proprietary trading, derivatives structuring, emerging market fixed-income, and currency trading. He graduated from Purdue University with a degree in Management. TWST: Please start with an overview of Arrow ponents to the recent sale of Rydex. I met this team when I was Funds. Tell us all about its investment philosophy and what the Director of Portfolio Management at Rydex. I joined Arrow you do there. Funds earlier this year, in the capacity of Chief Investment Offi- Mr. Flaig: Arrow Funds is one of the fasting growing cer, with a mandate to enhance the firm’s manufacturing capabil- investment management companies in the industry. The company ity of absolute return strategies and oversee other investment was formed in early 2006 and launched its first product, the initiatives. Absolute return strategies aim to produce positive re- Arrow DWA Balanced Fund, in August of that year.
    [Show full text]