Ganta (Guinean Border-32.5 Km) of OPRC Lot 2 – Gbarnga – Ganta – Guinea Border Road Rehabilitation Project

Resettlement Action Plan

Public Disclosure Authorized St. John River Bridge to Ganta (Guinean Border-32.5 km) of OPRC Lot 2 – Gbarnga – Ganta – Guinea Border Road Rehabilitation Project

PROJECT ID NO.: P125574 Loan No: 49HIDAH49500 Contract No.: LIBRAMP – MPW/LRTF/OPRC/GGG/002/’13

Public Disclosure Authorized

Resettlement Action Plan – Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY……………………………………………………... i

1.0 INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………. 1 1.1 Background……………………………………………………………… 1 1.2 Project Description and Location .………………………………………. 1 1.3 Objective of the Resettlement Action Plan ………..…………………….. 2 1.4 Approach and Methodology of the RAP……………………………..….. 3 1.5 Report Structure……………………………….…………………………. 3 1.6 Planning Principle………………………………………………………. 4

2.0 POLICY, REGULATORY & INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK ……. 5 2.1 Policy Framework ……………………………………………………….. 5 2.2 Regulatory Framework …………………………………………………… 6 2.3 Institutional Framework …………………………………...... 7 2.4 Land Tenure Systems …………………………………………………….. 8 2.5 Land Valuation System …………………………………………………… 8 2.6 Compensation …………………………………………………………….. 8 2.7 Grievance Remedial ………………………………………………………. 9 2.8 Comparison of Liberian Legislations & World Bank Policies,………....…. 9

3.0 SOCIO-ECONOMIC STUDY OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AREA.. 11 3.1 Survey Methodology and Approach ………………………………………. 11 3.2 Socio-Environment………………………………………………………... 12 3.2.1 Population…………………………………………………………. 12 3.3 Socio-economic Conditions of the Project Area…………………………. 12 3.3.1 Gender of the PAPs……………………………………………….. 12 3.3.2 Ages of the PAPs and Vulnerable PAPs…………………………. 12 3.3.3 Level of Education……………………………………………….. 12 3.3.4 Livelihood Activities of PAPs……………………………………. 13 3.3.5 Types and nature of Affected Structures………………………….. 13 3.3.6 Effect of Project on Affected Properties………………………….. 14 3.3.7 Land Tenure of PAPs……………………………………………… 14 3.3.8 PAPs Support to the Project and Willingness to Move…………… 15 3.3.9 Time Period to Relocate………………………………………….. 15 3.3.10 PAPs Preferred Mode of Compensation…………………………. 16

4.0 PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MITIGATION.………..……………. 17 4.1 Types of Impacts ………………………………………………………….. 17 4.2 Mitigation Measures……………………………………………………….. 18

5.0 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION…………………………………….………... 19 5.1 Consultation with Stakeholders …………………………………………… 19 5.1.1 Perception of the Project by Affected Persons………………….…. 19 x

Resettlement Action Plan – Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

5.2 Future Consultation Plans ………………………………………………… 20 5.3 Resettlement Consultation……………………………………………..…. 20 5.4 Disclosure of RAP Document…………………………………………... 20

6.0 RESETTLEMENT COMPENSATION TO PROJECT AFFECTED PERSONS……………………………………………………………….… 21 6.1 Eligibility Criteria for Project Affected Persons…………………………... 21 6.2 Consultation …………………..……………………………………….….. 21 6.3 Valuation Process/Methodology………………………………………….. 21 6.4 Mode of Restitution…………. …………………………………………… 22 6.5 Compensation and other Assistances …………………………………….. 22 6.6 Unit Cost per Structure……………………………………………………. 23 6.7 Compensation and Entitlement Matrix………………………….………… 24 6.8 Grievance Redress Mechanism……………...…………………………….. 25 6.8.1 PAPs Right to Redress………. ……………...……………………. 25 6.8.2 Grievance Procedure ……………………………………………… 25

7.0 RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES FOR RAP IMPLEMENTATION, MONITORING & EVALUATION……………………………………… 26 7.1 RAP Implementation …………………………………………………….. 26 7.2 Internal Review, Monitoring and Evaluation.……………………..……… 27 7.2.1 Performance Monitoring Indicators………………………………. 27 7.2.2 Reporting………………………………………………………….. 27

8.0 BUDGET, SOURCE OF FUNDING & TIME SCHEDULE FOR IMPLEMENTING RAP …………………………………..……….……. 28 8.1 Budgets for Implementing the RAP……………………………………… 28 8.2 Time Schedule for the RAP Implementation…………………………… 30

References………………………………………………………………………… 32

APPENDICES

APPENDIX 1: Compensation/Replacement Payment to Owners of Affected Structures Relocation Assistance to PAPs of Residential Structures Loss of Income & Relocation Assistance to PAPs of Commercial Structures and Assistance to Vulnerable PAPs APPENDIX 2: Compensation to Owners of Cash/Tree Crops APPENDIX 3: Survey Questionnaires – Residential & Commercial APPENDIX 4: Names/Contacts of Members of Resettlement Implementation Committee APPENDIX 5: Minutes & Attendance of Consultation Meeting in Ganta of August 3, 2013 APPENDIX 6: Minutes & Attendance of Consultation Meeting in Kpein of August 3, 2013

Resettlement Action Plan – Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

LIST OF FIGURE

Figure 1-1: Map showing the affected portion of the Gbarnga – Ganta Highway. 2 Figure 3-1: Graph Showing Gender of PAPs……………………………………. 12 Figure 3-2: Graph Showing Education Status of PAPs…………………………… 13 Figure 3-3: Graph Showing Livelihood Activities of PAPs……………………… 13 Figure 3-4: Graph Showing Structure Type………………………………………. 13 Figure 3-5: Graph Showing Nature of Structure………………………………….. 14 Figure 3-6: Graph Showing the Land Tenure of PAPs…………………………… 14 Figure 3-7: Graph Showing the Time PAPs Occupied Project Area……………… 15 Figure 3-8: Graph Showing the PAPs Time to Relocate………………………….. 15 Figure 3-9: Graph Showing PAPs Mode of Compensation……………………….. 16 Figure 7-1: RAP Implementing Entities…………………………………………… 26

LIST OF TABLES

Table 2.1: Comparison between Liberian Legislations and World Bank Policies 9 Table 3-1: Gender of the PAPs...... 12 Table 3-2: Education Status of PAPs………………………………………….. 13 Table 3-3: Livelihood Activities of the PAPs…………………………………. 13 Table 3-4 Types of Structures………………...... 13 Table 3-5: Nature of Structures………………………………………………… 14 Table 3-6: Land Tenure of PAPs ……………………………………………… 14 Table 3-7: Duration of Occupancy of PAPs…………………………………... 15 Table 3-8: PAPs’ Time to Relocate……………………………………………. 15 Table 3-9: PAPs’ Preferred Mode of Compensation…………………………… 16 Table 3-10: Summary Table of the RAP ...... 16 Table 6.1: Valuation Process...... 22 Table 6-2: Unit Rates of Structure Kinds……………………………………… 23 Table 6-3: Unit Rates of Other Structures…………………………………….. 24 Table 6-4: Compensation and Entitlement Matrix for PAPs...... 24 Table 6.1: Matrix showing Implementing Agencies of the RAP ...... 38 Table 8-1: Budget for Implementation of the RAP……………………………. 29 Table 8-2: Budget Cost for Phase One of the RAP...... 29 Table 8-3: Budget Cost for Phase Two of the RAP...... 30 Table 8-4: Implementation Schedule of the RAP,...... 31

xii

Resettlement Action Plan – Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

LIST OF ACRONYMS

CHICO - China Henan International Group Company Ltd.

EPA - Environmental Protection Agency

GAC - General Auditing Commission

GOL - Government of Liberia

IAS - Internal Audit Secretariat

IRP - Involuntary Resettlement Policy km - kilometer

LRRRC - Liberian Refugee Repatriation & Resettlement Commission

MLME - Ministry of Lands, Mines & Energy

MOF - Ministry of Finance

MPW - Ministry of Lands, Mines & Energy

OP - Operational Policy

PAPs - Project Affected Persons

RAP - Resettlement Action Plan

SES - Socio-Economic Survey

WB - World Bank

xiii

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway - Nimba County August 2013

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Introduction Most of the road network in Liberia was constructed more than thirty years ago, long before the civil conflicts. Even before the civil conflicts and long after, maintenance of the road network could not be undertaken due to lack of the financial capability. Hence, most of the road network deteriorated rapidly, making them unworthy for travelling thereon. Such is the condition of the Gbarnga – Ganta Highway.

After the civil crisis, the World Bank (WB) resumed its intervention in Liberia and took on a leading role in the areas of infrastructure, economic management, and community driven development programs. As part of the infrastructure program, the World Bank is supporting the Government of Liberia (GOL) to improve the road network of the country. This support is under projects which are intended to rebuild derelict road networks that were destroyed as a result of having outlived their lifespan.

In order to meet statutory and international requirements, certain distances within the right-of-way of both sides of the motor road are expected to be free of obstructions. At present, there exist structures within the right-of-way of portions of the highway that is to be reconstructed. Occupants of these structures are expected to be relocated and compensated for losses incurred, so as to provide for the implementation of the project.

Against this background, CHICO hired the services of Earth Environmental Consultancy, Inc., a local Liberian environmental firm, to prepare a Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) for the resettlement and relocation of occupants of structures within the right-of-way from km Gbarnga (Bong County) to Ganta City (Nimba County), up to the Guinea border, so as to provide for the reconstruction of the highway road between these cities.

Project Location and Affected Areas This overall project area under Loan No. 49HIDAH49500 is the Gbarnga – Ganta Highway, up to the Guinea border. This is a highway of approximately 68.6 kilometers. It is expected that the right-of-way along this road length will be affected as a result of the reconstruction of the highway. This is likely to lead to the involuntary resettlement of persons within the right of way along the corridor. The project is also to have other social impacts on livelihood, restriction of access, loss of assets among others. And to meet statutory and international standards, right-of-way of 50 to 75 feet will be established. 50 feet on both side of the road will be considered within urban limits and 75 feet within the rural areas. This has therefore triggered the World Bank’s Policy on Involuntary Resettlement, OP 4,12 which warrants the preparation of a resettlement action plan. Though the entire project covers area from Gbarnga to Ganta, the portion considered in this Report is only the area in Nimba County, from the St. John River Bridge to the Custom Office at the Guinean border in Ganta City.

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

Objective of the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) The RAP is aimed at collecting detailed information on persons who will be directly affected by the project activities, types and magnitude of impacts, as well as identifying options and strategies for compensating such affected persons for resettlement. The cut- off-date was set at August 3, 2013.

Approach and Methodology of Social Assessment The methodology and approach adopted in preparing the RAP is consistent with The Liberian Constitution (2006) and other Statutory Laws and Regulations among others, coupled with the World Bank Safeguard Policy O.P 4.12.

Report Structure This report provides the RAP for the portion of the Gbarnga – Ganta Highway from the St. John River Bridge to the Custom Offices at the Guinea border, a distance of approximately 32.5 kilometers. The report has been prepared to cover the following:

Chapter One: Introduces the project, location, purpose and methodology.

Chapter Two: Presents the existing policy, regulatory and institutional framework. The Section also presents an assessment of the legal framework and reviews provisions of municipal regulations and the World Bank’s policy requirements.

Chapter Three: Provides the planning principles upon which the RAP is being prepared and objectives to be achieved. This section also provides the public participation in preparing the RAP and disclosure method.

Chapter Four: This Section reports on the socio-economic survey of the project area. The section also describes the project impacts and mitigation measures.

Chapter Five: Outlines the proposed assistance to project affected persons. It discusses the methodology for taking inventory of losses, replacement cost study, vulnerable groups and compensation/entitlement matrix.

Chapter Six: Outlines the eligibility criteria and compensation procedure. The section also outlines redress mechanisms for aggrieved persons for peaceful resolution of possible grievances in connection with compensation. It also shows the grievance redress mechanism and mitigation.

Chapter Seven: Shows the responsible agencies for the implementing agencies, monitoring and evaluation of the RAP.

Chapter Eight: Presents the RAP budget and time schedule for implementation.

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

Policy, Regulatory and Institutional Framework The RAP takes into account applicable existing policy, institutional and regulatory frameworks within the context of Liberian Law. Preparation of this RAP draws on the requirements of the World Bank Policies 4.12 Involuntary Resettlement and relevant social safeguard policies. The RAP also draws on the Liberian Constitution of 1986, the Aborigine Law of 1956, Property Law of 1976, Revised Rules and Regulations Governing the Hinterland of Liberia (2001) and recent Land Right Policy (2013).

Socio-Economic Study of the Proposed Project Area A Socio-Economic Survey (SES) was conducted of the Project Affected Household- heads (PAHs), who are the owners and tenants of structures within the right of way of the Gbarnga – Ganta Highway, from the St. John River Bridge to the Customs Offices at the Guinea border in Ganta City. Most of the project affected household-heads (PAHs) were interviewed for the purpose of gaining information on their situation and present living standards. Most PAHs will lose partial or entire of the structures within the project area. They are mainly persons who do not own the land and will therefore not lose land. The SES could not cover all of the possible PAHs because the survey team could not meet with some PAHs due to their absence. 472 structures were recorded. Of these, 9 structures owners were unavailable. It was also observed that some owners owned multiple structures. Hence, 383 structure owners were interviewed during the survey. 9 structures owners could not be found regardless of efforts such as site investigations, announcement through radio stations, posting notice on all structures and discussions with relevant authorities

A total of 383 PAHs (male and females) were identified, whose structures are to be demolished. The structures include concrete building with zinc roof, mud-dubbed structures with zinc and thatched roofs, mud bricks with zinc and thatched roofs, wooden structures with zinc roofs and containers.

The survey indicates that majority of the PAHs are aged 18 to 69. This age range account for 370 or 97% of the 394 PAHs interviewed. 13 or 3% of the PAPs are aged 65 years and above. It is this group of PAPs, along with female household- heads, that are considered vulnerable and will receive some assistance for vulnerability.

About half (50%) of the PAHs have formal education, though most only completed secondary school. 23% dropped out of school at some time in elementary, junior high or high school; and 27% never attended school.

Majority of the PAHs are engaged in livelihood activities. Most are self-employed, evidenced by the majority commercial structures in the project area. These persons are mainly in the urban area. For the rural areas, majority of the PAHs are farmers. The PAHs will however not disclose their income in financial terms for fear of taxation or disclosure to neighbors who were nearby during the survey. Since they also do not keep proper records of their financial activities, there was no way to independently verify same. Results of studies done in similar setting, where better data were available, were used.

iii

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

There are 472 structures that will be affected by the project. The structures include concrete blocks building, mud bricks buildings with zinc and thatch roofs, mud dub buildings with zinc and thatch roofs, wood frame structures with zinc and thatch roofs, containers and others, which include kiosks, fence and a water well, etc. Some of the PAHs own more than one structure, thus 383 PAHs own 463 structures. 9 structure owners were unavailable for the survey.

The survey sought to find out preferred modes of compensation. All the PAHs (100%) stated that the project was beneficiary to the community and they would move to allow for its implementation. The majority (98%) prefer cash compensation or financial assistance so that they can seek relocation.

Summary Table S – 1 of the RAP Description Comment Region Northeastern Liberia County Nimba County Type of Civil Work & Road Length Rehabilitation and pavement strengthening of existing Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Asphalt Concrete Pavement – 32.5 km

Total Number of Structures to be Affected by the 472 Project Total Number of Patches of Farms/Tree Crops affected 135 Total Number of PAHs unavailable for survey 9 Total Number of Eligible PAHs 383 Total Number of Males PAHs 257 Total Number of Females PAHs 126 Total Number of Affected Persons, including members of household and employees 1,042

Number of Affected Communities Bain-Garr and Loa Districts Number of Affected Public Utilities 6 community water wells and hand pumps Graves 2 sets of 21 graves in total Mosque/Church 1 Schools none Total Budget for Implementation of RAP US$1,643,792.83

Project Impacts and their Mitigations The goal of the project is to improve transportation, social welfare and enhance living standards of residents of Bong and Nimba Counties, and all Liberians as a whole through an efficient road transport network. However, the road to be reconstructed transverses through areas of diverse land uses. Therefore, its reconstruction is expected to have a widespread positive impact on overall the socio-economic status and livelihoods of the iv

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

road users, project affected people (PAHs) as well as the economy of Bong and Nimba Counties and the country. There will however be some negative impacts. For the negative impacts, mitigation measures are presented to mitigate these impacts. The major negative impacts include permanent losses of residential and commercial structures, loss of land, loss of public facilities, and adjustment of fences and relocation of businesses.

Public Participation and Consultation Consultations were held with a wide range of stakeholders including community leaders, household heads, business owners, landlords, structure owners. Local authorities and leaders from various administrative levels were also consulted as part of the preliminary phase of this project. The objectives of these consultations were:

• Dissemination of information among potentially affected communities about the intended project; • Getting perception of communities towards the project; • Identification of anticipated project impacts on the socio-economic and cultural life of the community; and • Identification of stakeholders and their roles in project activities.

Disclosure of RAP Document The Resettlement Action Plan for this 32.5.1 kilometer from the St. John River Bridge to the Customs Building at Ganta will be disclosed in Liberia by the Ministry of Public Works, through the Infrastructure Implementation Unit (IIU), and the EPA. There will be newspaper adverts as well. Summary of the RAP will be hosted in the affected area. Copies will also be disclosed at the Administrative Building in Ganta City, Nimba County. After the in-county disclosure, the World Bank will also disclose the report at its infoshop.

Resettlement Compensation to Project Affected Persons

For a person to be considered a project affected person (PAP), the property, crops or activity of the person must fall within the right-of-way designated for the construction of the Gbarnga – Ganta Highway, from the St. John River Bridge to the Customs Offices at the Guinea border. Those eligible for compensations are occupants (tenants, land and crops owners) of properties that will be affected or demolished and who also met the cut- off-date.

Vulnerable people who will be considered include female PAHs as structure heads and those who are 65 or more years of age who are at risk of being deprived of productive assets such as land/house. These persons are earmarked for vulnerability assistance, in addition to other payments or assistances.

All of the properties to be affected by the construction of the motor road have been valued and assessed according to laid down procedure. The regulations for valuation of real properties set by the Real Estate Division of the Ministry of Finance and best practices were used. For crops, the price list set by the Ministry of Agriculture was used.

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

Details of compensation due PAHs for affected properties and crops are provided in - Appendices 1 and 2 respectively.

Mode of Restitution Owners of structures and crops whose properties are affected by the project are protected by law and would receive adequate compensation for their properties. If the property owner is not satisfied with the offer of GOL/MPW, he/she has the option of requesting a private valuer of his/her choice to reassess the property and submit the same to MPW and Earth Environmental Consultancy for consideration and final determination of the value of the property. The determined figure will be considered.

However, in the situation where the affected person is still not satisfied with the amount of compensation payable to him, he is at liberty to seek redress at the courts. However, the property cannot be demolished until the issue is resolved.

Therefore, all those persons who are affected regardless of their legal status concerning the affected area should be considered as Project Affected Persons (PAPs). Table S – 2 below shows the Compensation and Entitlement Matrix for PAHs.

Category of Entitlement / Compensation PAHs Type of Loss Compensation for Compensation for loss of Payment Regime

loss of structure/ Accommodation/income land or crops Owner of structure Loss of structure Replacement value Relocation and Lump sum of transportation assistance total Owner of crops Loss of crops Stipulated N/A Lump sum of Compensation total Owner of land Loss of land Replacement value N/A Lump sum of total Business owners Loss of income N/A Assistance for loss of Lump sum business income and payment Relocation Assistance Vulnerable Loss of Special assistance Relocation and Lump sum Persons accommodation disturbance assistance payment

Grievance Redress Mechanism Cash compensation will be paid to all PAHs whose structures, crops and/or land are to be demolished or cleared to allow for the implementation of the project.

Each individual PAH has the right to refuse the compensation rate proposed, if he/she finds the compensation to be inadequate and unfair under replacement cost. In the event of disagreement, the affected party may first seek recourse through the Committee set up for that purpose to implement the RAP. The PAH is allowed to engage his/her own valuer to determine the compensation due. The valuer and the Grievance Committee together with the relevant valuation entities will negotiate a settlement. If the PAH is still not convinced with what has been proposed, as stated above, he/she can take the case to the court for redress. vi

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

RAP Implementation Implementation of the RAP will involve relevant institutions with experience in displacement and resettlement programs. These institutions, as shown in Figure 8-1, will include (1) Ministry of Public Works/Infrastructure Implementation Unit, (2) General Auditing Commission (GAC), (3) Liberia Refugee Repatriation and Resettlement Commission (LRRRC), (4) The Ministry of Lands, Mines & Energy (MLME) (5) Ministry of Finance (MOF), (6)The Internal Audit Secretariat (IAS); and (7) EPA.

Internal Review, Monitoring & Evaluation There will firstly be an internal review process to be conducted by the IIU to ensure that all those listed on the compensation listing are qualified and certified. It is to these PAHs that payment will be made. Further, an external monitor should be selected to conduct the external monitoring and evaluation stage to strengthen consistency and follow-up of the whole project process.

Budget for Implementing the RAP The population affected by this project, includes people occupying the right-of-way along the Gbarnga – Ganta Highway, from the St. John River Bridge to the Custom offices at the Guinean border. Some of these PAHs are legitimate landowner and will therefore receive full replacement cost for their property. Some do not have legitimate title and are not entitled to compensation for loss of land under the World Bank policy. However, they are entitled to compensation for any improvement made to the land as well as to resettlement assistance if they occupied the project area before the established cutoff date. Vulnerable persons will also receive some form of compensation.

The values presented assume a standard permanent house, even when it is temporary, to comply with the requirement of the provision of World Bank policy for preparing resettlement action plan, which outlines that PAPs should be assisted to improve their standards of living or at least to restore them to their pre-displacement levels.

From the valuation, the total cost for compensation and resettlement of PAPs for structures in the affected area amounts to US$1,335,617.50. The cost for loss of cash/tree crops is US$212,582.82. The cost for loss of business income is US$15,650.00. The cost for Relocation/Transportation Allowance is US$23,250.00. The cost for Assistance to Vulnerable Persons is US$6,600.00 and the cost for the administration, monitoring and evaluation is US$10,000.00. There is no cost for land as no PAHs has produced genuine deed for land. Should same be produced in future, amount set aside in contingency will cover same. The tables below show the RAP budget.

vii

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

Budget for the Implementation of the RAP in Table S- 3.

Estimated Source of Cost Item Comments Cost(US$) Funding Compensation to Affected Persons Compensation for all structures 1,335,617.50 Compensation will be paid for loss of complete or GOL/MPW/IIU partial structures on affected areas. This is estimated Compensation for loss of Compensation will be paid to owner of businesses 15,650.00 GOL/MPW/IIU business income that will be relocated or disturbed during the Relocation/Transport Assistance 23,250.00 Amount to assist PAPs relocate from the project area GOL/MPW/IIU Assistance to Vulnerable Persons 6,600.00 Amount to assist vulnerable persons GOL/MPW/IIU Compensation for affected land - Amount will be taken from contingency in future GOL/MPW/IIU Compensation for affected crops 212,582.82 Amount to PAHs for affected cash/tree crops GOL/MPW/IIU SUB-TOTAL: $1,593,700.32 Implementation, Monitoring & Evaluation

Amount to be utilized for the transportation, Verification Team 2,500.00 GOL/MPW/IIU accommodation and feeding of the Verification

2,500.00 Amount to be utilized for the transportation, Pay Team accommodation and feeding of the Pay Team GOL/MPW/IIU Amount to be used for the hiring of demolition 5,000.00 equipment and provision of fuel for the demolition Demolition GOL/MPW/IIU of all structures within the project area. SUB-TOTAL: $10,000.00 Contingency: (2.5% of Sub-Totals) $40,092.51 TOTAL RAP BUDGET: $1,643,792.83

Budget Cost for Phase One of the RAP in Table S-4

Total Cost No Items/Activities No. Unit 1 Concrete Structures 107 769,790.50

2. Mud Bricks/Zinc Roof 157 423,984.25 3. Mud Bricks/Thatch Roof 7 20,422.00 4. Mud Dub/Zinc Roof 34 65,295.00

5. Mud Dub/Thatch Roof 13 7,691.50

6. Wooden Frame/Zinc Roof 115 48,209.75 7. Wooden Frame/Thatch Roof 24 6,916.50

8. Others 15 38,808.00

9. Cash/Tree Crops 212,582.82 Sub-Total: 1,593,700.32 viii

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

Budget Cost for Phase Two of the RAP in Table S-5.

Phase Two: Implementation, Monitoring & Evaluation

No Items/Activities Total Cost (US$) 11. Verification Team (Accommodation, Feeding & Transportation) 2,500.00

12. Pay Team (Accommodation, Feeding & Transportation) 2,500.00

13. Demolition (Equipment hiring and fuel) 5,000.00

SUB-TOTAL: 10,000.00 14. Miscellaneous (2.5% of Sub-totals) 40,092.51

GRAND-TOTAL: 1,643,792.83

Time Schedule for RAP Implementation The time period for the implementation of the RAP is estimated below, as indicated in Table S- 6 below. The implementation period takes into account important variables such as detailed asset survey and negotiation with APAs. It also provided for resolution of conflicts and grievances and cash flow from GOL/MPW/IIU to the PAHs.

S - 6: Implementation Schedule of the RAP

Responsible Agency No. RAP Activity (Institution) Target Date

1 Socio-economic Survey/ RAP Commencement CHICO/EEC July - Aug. 2013 2 Stakeholder Meetings CHICO/EEC July - Aug. 2013 3 Detailed Assets Survey and Compensation Estimation IIU/MPW July - Aug. 2013 4 Negotiation with PAHs & RAP Budget Approval IIU/MPW April 2014 5 RAP Approval WB May 2014 6 RAP Disclosure IIU/MPW & WB May - June 2014 7 Grievances/Complaints Redress IIU/MPW & PAHs After Disclosure 8 RAP Compensation Payment IIU/MPW After Disclosure 9 Relocation of Project Affected Persons (PAPs) PAPs After Disclosure 10 Completion of Relocation of PAPs IIU/MPW & PAPs After Disclosure 11 Demolition Exercise of Affected Structures IIU/MPW After Disclosure 12 RAP Implementation Completion Report IIU/MPW After Disclosure

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

1.0 INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background Most of the road network in Liberia was constructed more than thirty years ago, long before the civil conflicts. Even before the civil conflicts and long after, maintenance of the road network could not be undertaken due to lack of the financial capability. Hence, most of the road network deteriorated rapidly, making them unworthy for travelling thereon. Such is the condition of the Gbarnga – Ganta Highway.

In order to meet statutory and international requirements, certain distances within the right-of- way of both sides of the motor road are expected to be free of obstructions. At present, there exist structures within the right-of-way of portions of the highway that is to be reconstructed. Occupants of these structures are expected to be relocated and compensated for losses incurred, so as to provide for the implementation of the project.

The World Bank Operational Policies 4.12 requires that social impacts of all project be mitigated according to operational polices that spell out the principles and planning methods for mitigation work. The WB OP. 4.12 now applies whenever property must be acquired, demolished or its usage modified to allow for the implementation of projects, and that acquisition, demolition or modification results in the loss of income, residence or access to resources, either permanent or temporary and whether the occupation is legal or illegal. This standard is also enforced by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of Liberia which requires that for all projects where resettlement is required, a Resettlement Action Plan must be implemented before permit will be issued for the implementation of said project.

1.2 Project Description and Location This overall project area under Loan No. 49HIDAH49500 is the Gbarnga – Ganta Highway, up to the Guinea border. This is a highway of approximately 68.61 kilometers. It is expected that the right-of-way along this road length will be affected as a result of the reconstruction of the highway. This is likely to lead to the involuntary resettlement of persons within the right of way along the corridor. The project is also to have other social impacts on livelihood, restriction of access, loss of assets among others. And to meet statutory and international standards, right-of- way of 50 to 75 feet will be established. 50 feet will be considered within urban limits and 75

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

feet within the rural areas. This has therefore triggered the World Bank’s Policy on Involuntary Resettlement, OP 4,12 which warrants the preparation of a resettlement action plan. Though the entire project covers area from Gbarnga to Ganta, the portion considered in this Report is only area in Nimba County, from the St. John River Bridge to the Custom Office at the Guinean border in Ganta City. Figure 1-1 shows the portion of the Gbarnga – Ganta Highway considered in this Report.

Figure 1-1: Map showing the portion of the Gbarnga – Ganta Highway covered in this Report.

1.3 Objective of the Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) The RAP is aimed at collecting detailed information on persons who will be directly affected by the project activities, types and magnitude of impacts, as well as identifying options and strategies for compensating such affected persons for resettlement.

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

The methodology and approach adopted in preparing the RAP is consistent with The Liberian Constitution (2006) and other Statutory Laws and Regulations among others, coupled with the World Bank Safeguard Policy O.D 4.12.

A socio-economic baseline has been developed and a valuation for compensation costs prepared in an attempt to maintain the livelihoods of the PAPs.

1.4.1 Approach The approach adopted in the RAP is consistent with existing Liberian laws, the project objectives and the World Bank's Operational Policy 4.12.

The Liberian Constitution recognizes the rights of individuals to properties. The Constitution also considers that private property can be utilized for public use, fulfilling certain obligations.

There is also a Poverty Reduction Strategy being implemented by the Government, whereby the lives of the ordinary people are been improved through the reduction of poverty and ensuring sustainable economic growth.

In compiling the RAP, various steps were taken in order to meet the requirements of national legislation and objectives of World Bank Safeguard Policy 4.12. To ensure that concerns of major stakeholders were incorporated in the RAP, consultation meetings were held throughout the RAP preparation process and are expected to continue up to the implementation.

1.4.2 Methodology Initially, data about the project site was collected through the review of the existing data sources which included the Liberian Census 2008 Report and maps of the project area. Secondly, a reconnaissance survey was undertaken by a team of consultants comprising environmentalists in order to get a deeper understanding of the technological, biophysical and socio-economical environment of the project site. Thirdly, focused group discussions were held with county and community leaders in order to have a feel of their desires and expectations concerning the project.

Finally, a socio-economic survey of the project area was conducted in order to evaluate the socio-economic conditions of the project affected people (PAPs) prior to the project works. The understanding of critical socio-economic parameters of the PAPs, and valuation of the properties to be lost, will enable the project proponent to address impacts of resettlement in a positive manner.

1.5 Report Structure: This report provides the RAP for the portion of the Gbarnga – Ganta Highway from the St. John River Bridge to the Custom Offices at the Guinea border, a distance of approximately 32.5 kilometers. The report has been prepared to cover the following:

Chapter One: Introduces the project, location, purpose and methodology.

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

Chapter Four: This Section reports on the socio-economic survey of the project area. The section also describes the project impacts and mitigation measures.

Chapter Five: Outlines the proposed assistance to project affected persons. It discusses the methodology for inventory of loss, replacement cost study, inventory of loss, vulnerable groups and compensation/entitlement matrix.

Chapter Seven: Shows the responsible agencies for the implementing agencies, monitoring and evaluation of the RAP.

Chapter Eight: Presents the RAP budget and time schedule for implementation.

1.6 Planning Principle In order to achieve the underlying objectives of the project (i.e. the PAPs derive maximum benefit), the planning process considered public education, stakeholder sensitization and evaluation of project impacts.

The main objectives of this Resettlement Action Plan are:

• To raise the awareness of the project and its consequences among the public in general and those who will be directly affected by it in particular.

• To estimate the costs necessary for resettlement/land acquisition

• To prepare a Resettlement Action Plan (RAP) that sets out strategies and schedules to mitigate adverse effects. The RAP sets the parameters and establishes entitlements for project affected people (PAP), the institutional framework, mechanisms for consultation and grievance resolution, the time schedule and budget, and proposed monitoring and evaluation system. The agreed entitlement package includes both compensation and measures to restore the economic and social base of those affected. It addresses the requirements of the Government of Liberia, as fostered by the Environmental Protection Agency, and the World Bank for land acquisition and resettlement.

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

2.0 POLICY, REGULATORY AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK

The RAP takes into account applicable existing policy, institutional and regulatory frameworks within the context of Liberian Law. Preparation of this RAP draws on the requirements of the World Bank Policies 4.12 Involuntary Resettlement and relevant social safeguard policies. The RAP also draws on the Liberian Constitution of 1986, the Aborigine Law of 1956, Property Law of 1976, Revised Rules and Regulations Governing the Hinterland of Liberia (2001) and recent Land Right Policy (2013).

2.1 Policy Framework Land Right Policy of Liberia (2013) The Land Right Policy of 2013 provides policy recommendations for land rights in Liberia, centered on four basic types of rights: Public Land, Government Land, Customary Land, and Private Land.

The Policy also fosters equal protection of all relative to land matters. The policy recognizes that since the founding of Liberia, the lands of customary communities have been less secure than private lands. This must end such that lands under customary practice and norms are given protection equal to that of private lands. This policy aims to give equal protection to the land rights of men and women.

National Environmental Policy (2003) The National Environmental Policy aims at improving the physical environment, quality of life and coordination between economic development, growth, and sustainable management of natural resources. Key objectives of the policy include:

• The systematic and logical framework with which to address environmental issues; • Benchmarks for addressing environmental problems in the medium- to long-term; • Context for financial/donor support to particular sectors and non-sector; • The means for generating information and awareness on environmental problems; and • To demonstrate Liberia’s commitment to sustainable management of the environment.

World Bank Operational Policy 4.12 – Involuntary Resettlement The World Bank’s environmental and social safeguard policies are a cornerstone of its support to sustainable poverty reduction. The objective of these policies is to prevent and mitigate undue harm to people and their environment in the development process. These policies provide guidelines for the identification, preparation, and implementation of programs and projects.

The Bank believes that the effectiveness and development impact of projects and programs it supports has substantially increased as a result of attention to these policies. Safeguard policies also provide a platform for the participation of stakeholders in project design and have been an important instrument for building a sense of ownership among local populations.

In essence, the safeguards ensure that social issues are evaluated through consultations, help reduce and manage the risks associated with a project or program, and provide a mechanism for consultation and disclosure of information. OP 4.12 particularly deals with the issue of Involuntary Resettlement.

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

According to World Bank’s Involuntary Resettlement Policy, the resettlement plan should include measures to ensure that displaced persons are:

• Informed about their options and rights pertaining to resettlement; • Consulted on, offered choices among, and provided with technically and economically feasible resettlement alternatives and • Provided prompt and effective compensation at full replacement cost for losses • Provided assistance (such as moving allowances) during relocation, and • Provided with residential housing, or housing sites, or as required agricultural sites for which a combination of productive potential, location advantages and other factors is at least equivalent to the advantages of old sites.

2.2 Regulatory Framework The Liberian Constitution and other laws provide for resettlement and compensation. This section provides a detailed description of the legal framework for the implementation of involuntary resettlement projects in Liberia, taking into account the following applicable Liberian Laws.

Liberian Constitution 1986 Article 22 (a) and (b) of the Constitution of Liberia gives right to all individuals to own property, either on individual basis or in conjunction with other individuals, as long as they are Liberian citizens. The right to ownership of property however does not extend to mineral resources on or beneath the land.

Article 24 indicates that the state guarantees the inviolability of property rights, but then provides for the expropriation of property for public purposes. It requires prompt payment of just compensation where this occurs. However, there is a lack of procedural provisions.

Article 65 also contains provision that the courts shall apply both statutory and customary laws in accordance with the standards enacted by the Legislature. This provides the constitutional basis for the application of the customary land tenure rules under which many rural Liberians hold their land.

Aborigines Law of 1956 Chapter II of this Act states that each tribe is entitled to the use of as much of the public land in the area inhabited by the tribe, as is required for farming and other enterprises essential to tribal necessities. It shall have the possession of such land as against any other person.

It goes further to say that the omission of a tribe to have its territory so delimited shall not, however, affect in any way its right to the use of the land.

Property Law of 1976 This law established the conditions under which a Liberian can own real property and dispose of same. It states that one must hold title document for such land and when transferring same, it shall be done by title, duly registered.

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

Revised Rules & Regulations Governing the Hinterland of Liberia (2001) These rules are a successor to the earlier Law and Regulations on the Hinterland. These rules apply not only to hinterland, but also to land in older counties, under the customary land tenure system.

Articles 66 and 67 of the rules grant tribal people in a rural area the right to utilize land in their locale. And that any stranger wishing to utilize such land as against their usage, such stranger shall compensate for the use of the land.

2.3 Institutional Framework The institutions that have the statutory roles in implementation of this RAP are as follows:

Ministry of Public Works This ministry has the statutory responsibility to approve the design and construction of all civil works, including motor road. Additionally, it is also responsible to carry out urban and town planning, as well as provide architectural and engineering supervision of infrastructure required for waste management.

Liberia Refugee Resettlement Reintegration Commission This commission is clothed with the responsibility of ensuring that people affected by the civil crisis are resettled and reintegrated into the society. .

Ministry of Lands, Mines and Energy This Ministry, besides its pivotal role in mineral resource development, is also in charge of administering and regulating public and private lands. This includes land tenure, land policy, land reform, land use, planning, and other aspects of land administration.

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) The EPA is responsible for monitoring, coordinating, and supervising the sustainable management of Liberia’s environment. It is mandated to ensure the conduct of environmental impact assessment for all projects and activities that are likely to have significant adverse effects on the environment.

Ministry of Finance (MOF) The Ministry of Finance (MOF) is the agency of Government responsible for the allocation of funds for the RAP implementation.

General Auditing Commission (GAC) The General Auditing Commission is the agency of Government responsible for ensuring accountability and transparency. The entity will ensure that funds provided and expensed for the intended purposes as stipulated in this RAP.

Internal Audit Secretariat (IAS) The Internal Audit Secretariat is the institution of government responsible to ensure that spending of the government is expedient and that there is value for money. Its role is to ensure careful spending of money.

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

2.4 Land Tenure Systems

Customary Tenure Customary tenure involves the use of land which the government has granted to people in the hinterland through customary rights. The process begins with the Town Chief, then the Clan or Paramount Chief and finally the District Commissioner who prepares Customary Land Grant Certificates which are subsequently legalized by the President of Liberia.

Freehold Tenure This involves holding land in perpetuity or for a term fixed by a condition and enables the holder to exercise, subject to the law, full powers of ownership.

Leasehold Tenure This tenure is created either by contract or by operation of the law. Under leasehold tenure, the landlord or lessor grants the tenant or lessee exclusive possession of the land, usually for a specific period in return for a rent, granting the tenant security of tenure and a proprietary interest in the land.

2.5 Land Valuation System The Republic of Liberia is the original grantor of land and the public are all grantees. Anyone who obtains land from the State has a bona fide title and right to full possession and use of said land. However, the State has the right to revoke any previously granted title it has given.

In the exercise of such power of condemnation, the State, through its institutions, is statutorily obligated to first evaluate the current market value of the property to be acquired with the aim of providing just compensation to the affected owner. Where the land to be condemned is for public use, the State has the burden of replacing it with one of commensurate value.

2.6 Compensation The basis for one to receive compensation for acquired land is provided for by Article 24 of the 1986 Liberian Constitution. The provision states that expropriation may be authorized for national security issues or where the public health and safety are endangered, or for any other public purposes, provided:

• That reasons for such expropriation are given and it should be intended for public/national use; • That there is prompt payment of just compensation; • That such expropriation or the compensation offered may be challenged freely by the owner of the property in a court of law with no penalty for having brought such action; and • That when property taken for public use ceases to be so used, the Republic shall accord the former owner, the right of first refusal to re-acquire the property.

This basis is also supported by the recent Land Right Policy of 2013 that lands under customary practice and norms are given protection equal to that of private lands. For the customary practices, deeds are not usually issued for the transfer of land.

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

2.7 Grievance Remedial The laws of Liberia provides avenue for which an aggrieved party can seek redress. In the instance where the grievance lies against an entity of government, the first step in seeking redress is to lodge a complaint with the agency, which shall then conduct an administrative hearing and make a determination on the matter. Such decisions are subject to appeal to a court of competent jurisdiction. Appeal may also be taken to higher court from a lower court if the aggrieved is not satisfied with the judgment of the lower forum. An aggrieved may seek appellate review up to the Supreme Court of Liberia. The Supreme Court is the highest judicial body to which an appeal may be lodged and its decision is not appealable.

Besides the judicial system, a dispute may be resolved through mechanisms such as mediation at administrative agencies, where the aggrieved party refers the dispute to a third party for a decision binding on both parties; or arbitration, where both parties appoint a board or arbitrators who may make a binding decision on resolution of the dispute.

2.8 Comparison of Liberian Legislations and WB Operational Policy 4.12

The below Table 2-1 shows the comparison between the Liberian legislations and World Bank Operational Policy 4.12.

Table 2-1: Comparison between Liberian Legislations and World Bank Policies Theme Liberian Legislation World Bank Policy OP.4.12 Mitigation Measures Categories of There is no distinction Involuntary Resettlement should be Project should be designed to distinguish affected individuals between affected individuals. avoided where feasible, or between classes of affected individuals and Land owners, land tenants, minimized. this should be taken into consideration in land users, owners of • Particular attention should be awarding compensation. buildings, and owners of given to vulnerable groups perennial crops are all • Displaced persons should be grouped together and treated assisted to improve their likewise. livelihoods and standards of There are no separate living or at least to restore provisions especially for them to pre-project levels. vulnerable classes of people. Impacts Addresses only direct Compensation should involve Design project to take socio-economic physical impact of acquiring direct economic and social impact issues into consideration in determining land. Socio-economic cause by acquisition. compensation. considerations are not given It is not required to cover indirect priority. social or economic impacts, but it is good practice for the project proponent to undertake social assessment and implementation measures to minimize adverse impacts, particularly to poor and vulnerable groups Compensation & Affected persons are to be Affected persons should be: Adequate communication between Participation informed before repossession • Informed in a timely manner government agencies and affected of land. However, there is on their options and right individuals well ahead of scheduled period of repossession. no provision on the notice pertaining to resettlement • Offered choices among, and period, neither is there a provided with technically and distinction between farmed economically feasible land, nor developed land. resettlement alternatives Provided with timely and relevant information to host communities

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013 receiving re-settlers. Eligibility for Compensation is restricted to The absence of legal title to land or Design project to extend compensation compensation & individuals having a legal other assets is not, in itself, a bar to (social and economic) to individuals who do benefits title to affected land or compensation for lost assets or not have legal title to property property other resettlement assistance Monitoring & External evaluation is not Internal monitoring and external Design project to involve third party input Evaluation required evaluation are required in assessment of compensation to be paid.

In case of conflict between the Liberian Regulations and World Bank policies during the implementation of this RAP, the World Bank Policies will prevail.

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

3.0 SOCIO-ECONOMIC STUDY OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AREA

A Socio-Economic Survey (SES) was conducted of the Project Affected Household-heads (PAHs), who are the owners and tenants of structures within the right of way of the Gbarnga – Ganta Highway, from the St. John River Bridge to the Customs Offices at the Guinea border in Ganta City. Most of the project affected households (PAHs) were interviewed for the purpose of gaining information on their situation and present living standards. Most PAHs will lose part or their entire structures within the project area. They are mainly persons who do not have legitimate title to the land and will therefore not lose land. The SES could not cover all of the possible PAHs due to the absence of few. 472 structures were recorded. Of these, 9 structures owners were unavailable. It was also observed that some owners owned multiple structures. Hence, only 383 structure owners were interviewed during the survey. 9 structures owners could not be found regardless of efforts such as site investigations, subsequent verification, announcement through radio stations, posting notice on all structures and discussions with relevant authorities. The Resettlement Implementation Committee which will be established within MPW will have to follow up on the 9 household heads that were absent and update detail information of the RAP.

The themes for the survey were basic demography, vulnerability of the people, income, household condition, preferred mode of transportation, preferred mode of resettlement, etc.

The following discussion of the socio-economic characteristics of the consulted PAHs is based on a field survey conducted between July – August 2013. The RAP cut-off-date was set as August 3, 2013

3.1 Survey Methodology and Approach The socio-economic survey was conducted by qualified sociologists and socio-economists that focused on collection of primary data on demographic characteristics, income and livelihoods, and housing conditions. The primary data sources used to describe the existing socio-economic situation are as follows:-

• Census of all project affected people; • Household survey based on households that are to be directly affected by the project; • Public/community consultations that provide qualitative data; and • Inventory of affected assets in the area.

Questionnaires were used to obtain census and socio-economic information of the affected people. The objective of the survey was to establish the magnitude of the project impacts on the affected households as well as establish an inventory of assets likely to be impacted. To ensure concise response, pre-coded multiple-choice questions were used during the interviews.

The project team members held training and practical sessions focusing on interview techniques, recording responses, and standardization of assessments. The collected data were checked by supervisors, re-checked by a data analyst and edited for consistency, error and coding, both in the field and before data entry

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

3.2 Socio-Environment 3.2.1 Population Human settlement and commercial activities are the major undertaking in the project area. 1,042 PAPs were identified along the Gbarnga – Ganta Highway, from the St. John River Bridge to the Customs Office at the Guinean border. This is a distance of approximately 32.5 kilometers. Out of the 1,042 PAPs, 383 are household heads, 248 are children/wards/elderly and 411 employees who will be affected by the project.

Of the 383 household heads, 370 are aged between 18 and 65, while 10 of the PAPs are aged 65 and above. Males are in the majority (257 – 67%), while females make up the minority (126 - 33%).

The majority of the PAPs in the project area belong to the Gio and Mano ethnic groups. Few belong to one of the other 16 major ethnic groups of Liberia.

3.3 Socio-Economic Conditions of the Project Area 3.3.1 Gender of the PAHs A total of 383 household heads (male and females) were identified, whose structures are to be demolished. The structures include concrete building with zinc roof, mud-dubbed structures with zinc and thatched roofs, mud bricks with zinc and thatched roofs, wooden structures with zinc roofs and kiosks. The gender of the PAHs is shown in Table 3-1 and Figure 3-1.

Table 3-1: Gender of the PAHs. Population by Gender Survey Report Male 257 67% Female 126 33% 383 100%

Figure 3-1: Graph showing gender of PAHs.

3.3.2 Ages of PAHs and Vulnerable PAPs The survey indicates that majority of the PAHs are aged 18 to 64. This age range account for 370 or 97% of the 383 PAHs interviewed. 13 or 3% of the PAHs are aged 65 years or above. It is this group of PAHs, along with female PAHs, that are considered vulnerable and will receive some assistance for vulnerability. A total of 133 persons were recorded as vulnerable.

3.3.3 Level of Education Half (50%) of the PAHs have formal education, though most only completed secondary school. 23% dropped out of school at some time in elementary, junior high or high school. And 27% never entered school. Table 3-2 and Figure 3-2 show the educational status of the PAHs interviewed.

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

Table 3-2: Educational Status of PAHs. Population by Gender Survey Report Never Attended 96 27% Drop Out 82 23% Secondary & Above 178 50% 356 100%

Figure 3-2: Graph showing Educational Status of PAHs. 3.3.4 Livelihood Activities of PAHs

Majority of the PAHs are engaged in some form of activities to obtain their livelihood. Most are

self-employed, evidenced by the majority commercial structures in the project area. These persons are mainly in the urban area of Ganta. For the rural areas, majority of the PAHs are

farmers. The PAHs will however not disclose their income in financial terms due to their

academic limitations or for fear of taxation or disclosure to neighbors who were nearby during the survey. Since they also do not keep proper records of their financial activities, for even those doing business, there was no way to independently verify same. Table 3-3 and Figure 3-3 show the livelihood activities of the PAHs.

Table 3-3: Livelihood Activities of the PAHs What Do You Do For A Living? Survey Report Unemployed 5 1% Self-Employed 267 75% Employee 16 5% Farmers 66 19% 354 100% Figure 3-3: Graph showing livelihood activities of PAHs.

3.3.5 Types and nature of affected structures There are 472 structures that will be affected by the project. The structures include concrete blocks building, mud bricks buildings with zinc and thatch roofs, mud dub buildings with zinc and thatch roofs, wood frame structures with zinc and thatch roofs and others, which include kiosks, fence and water wells/hand pumps, etc. Some of the PAHs own more than one structure, thus 383 PAHs own 463 structures, as 9 structures owners were unavailable during the survey. 168 of these structures will be wholly affected, while the remaining 304 structures will be partially affected or removed to other locations, like in the case of kiosks/booths and containers that are removable. Table 3-4 and Figure 3-4 show the structure types in the project area.

Table 3-4: Types of Structures Structure Types Survey Report Concrete with zinc roof 107 23% Mud Bricks with zinc roof 157 33% Mud Bricks with thatch roof 7 1% Mud Dub with zinc roof 34 7% Mud Dub with thatch roof 13 3% Wood Frame with zinc roof 115 24% Wood Frame with thatch roof 24 5% Others 15 3% 472 100%

Figure 3-4: Graph showing structure types.

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

Out of the 472 structures observed during the survey, 137 are used for residential or related purposes, 321 are used for commercial or related purposes, and 14 used for other purposes not related to residential or commercial purposes. Table 3-5 and Figure 3-5 indicate the nature of structures observed.

Table 3-5 Nature of Structures Nature of structures Survey Report Residential Structures 137 29% Commercial Structures 321 68% Others 14 3% 472 100%

Figure 3-5: Graph showing nature of structure. 3.3.6 Effect of Project on Affected Properties

The survey shows that out of the 472 structures to be affected by the project, 168 will be wholly

affected. The remaining 304 will be partially affected. Partially affected structures include

structures where only porches or fences will be affected. Other structures like kiosks will receive

relocation assistance as they will not be destroyed, but simply relocated to other locations.

Though some structures were marked in the middle, those structures were considered as going to be fully or wholly affected since the remainder of the structures will not serve the original purpose. Therefore, the survey considered such structures to receive 100% compensation.

3.3.7 Land Tenure of PAHs During the conduct of the survey, despite being educated on tenure, majority of the PAHs claimed to have fee simple ownership of the property they occupy. However, when questioned about title deed for the property, fewer claimed to have same. Some claimed to have inherited the property. During the consultation/meeting, none of the PAHs presented title deed to substantiate their claim. It can therefore be concluded that majority of the PAHs may be considered as without genuine title. For the 9 structure owners who were not available during the survey, their tenure could not be established. Efforts will be made during follow-up process to locate these persons. Table 3-6 and Figure 3-6 present the land tenure of the PAHs as stated during the survey. Since majority of the PAHs did not properly establish their tenure, it is necessary to confirm their tenure before and during the implementation of the RAP, especially for those who were unavailable during the survey.

Table 3-6: Land Tenure of PAHs. Land tenure of PAHs Survey Report Own in Fee Simple 253 72% Rent 33 9% Lease 58 16% Other 8 2% 352 100%

Figure 3-6: Graph showing the land tenure of PAHs.

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

It was also gathered from the survey data that the majority of the PAHs have occupied the project area for up to ten (10) or more years. Few have even stayed more than 25 years in the area. However, the period stated by the PAHs could not be independently verified. Table 3-7 and Figure 3-7 show the length of time the PAHs claimed to have occupied the project area.

Table 3-7: Duration of Occupancy of PAHs. Time at project area Survey Report Less than 1 year 5 1% 1 – 5 years 157 45% 6 – 10 years 133 38% 11 – 15 years 28 8% 16 – 20 years 8 2% 21 – 25 years 7 2% More than 25 years 14 4% 352 100% Figure 3-7: Graph showing time PAHs occupied project area.

3.3.8 PAHs Support for the Project and Willingness to Move. The 383 PAHs interviewed were asked about their view for the Project and willingness to move to allow for the implementation of the Project. All of the PAHs who answered expressed high support for the Project and also indicated that they are willing to move to another location or be resettled to allow for the Project implementation.

3.3.9 Time Period to Relocate 352 PAHs responded to the question as to what time period would be adequate for them to relocate from the area, after receiving compensation. 9 or 2% of the 352 PAHs indicated that they would need up to 4 weeks to relocate. 81 or 22% stated that they would need up to 3 months to relocate, while 88 or 24% indicated that they would need up to 6 months to relocate. The majority – 189 or 52% stated that they would need up to 1 year to relocate. These results are presented in 3 - 8and Figure 3 - 8. However, during the stakeholders’ consultations that followed the survey, the majority of the PAHs attending indicated that a period of up to 3 months would be reasonable.

Table 3-8: PAPs’ Time to Relocate. Land tenure of PAPs Survey Report 1 – 3 months 193 55% 4 – 6 months 47 13% 6 – 12 months 112 32% 352 100%

Figure 3-8: Graph showing the PAPs time to relocate.

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

3.3.10 PAHs Preferred Mode of Compensation The survey sought to find out preferred modes of compensation as a way of developing a participatory driven compensation mechanism. All of the PAHs (100%) stated that the project was beneficiary to the community and they would move to allow for its implementation. The majority (98%) prefer cash compensation or financial assistance so that they can seek relocation. Table 3-9 and Figure 3-9 show the preferred mode of compensation of the PAHs.

Table 3-9: PAHs Preferred Mode of Compensation. How Do PAHs want to be resettled? Survey Report Cash Compensation 343 98% Alternative Land 5 1% Cash & Alternative Land 2 1% 350 100% Figure 3-9: Graph showing PAHs mode of compensation. The choice of the mode of compensation to PAHs in the project area is largely influenced by the fact that the nature of tenure on land is not clear for majority of the PAHs. This makes them most likely qualify for cash compensation for structures lost and disturbance allowance. Table 3-10 presents a summary table of the RAP.

Table 3-10: Summary Table of the RAP Description Comment Region Northeastern Liberia County Nimba County Type of Civil Work & Road Length Rehabilitation and pavement strengthening of existing Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Asphalt Concrete Pavement – 32.5 km

Total Number of Structures to be Affected by the Project 472 Total Number of Patches of Farms/Tree Crops to be affected 135 Total Number of PAHs unavailable for the survey/verification 9 Total Number of Eligible PAHs interviewed 383 Total Number of Males PAHs interviewed 257 Total Number of Females PAHs interviewed 126 Total Number of Affected Persons, including members of 1,042 household and employees Number of Affected Communities Bain-Garr and Loa Districts Number of Affected Public Utilities 6 community water wells and hand pumps Graves 2 sets of 21 graves in total Mosque/Church 1 Schools none Total Budget for Implementation of RAP US$1,643,792.83

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

4.0 PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MITIGATION The goal of the project is to improve transportation, social welfare and enhance living standards of residents of Bong and Nimba Counties, and all Liberians as a whole through an efficient road transport network. However, the road to be reconstructed transverses through areas of diverse land uses. Therefore, its reconstruction is expected to have a widespread positive impact on overall the socio-economic status and livelihoods of the road users, project affected people (PAPs) as well as the economy of Bong and Nimba Counties and the country. There will however be some negative impacts. For the negative impacts, mitigation measures are presented to mitigate these impacts. The major negative impacts include permanent losses of residential and commercial structures, loss of land, loss of public facilities, and adjustment of fences and relocation of businesses.

4.1 Types of Impacts

Positive Impacts Improved Transportation. The rehabilitation of the road will improve transportation between Gbarnga, Bong County, and Ganta, Nimba County, the two (2) largest commercial cities in Northern Liberia, making the movement of goods and services efficient.

Advance Regional Road Network. The rehabilitation of the road will also advance the planned regional transportation network between West African States as the Gbarnga – Ganta Highway connects with other road networks in the country, which connect with roads in bordering countries

Negative Impacts Loss of Residential houses and other Domestic Structures: 137 or 29% of the structures, which are solely residential, will be affected. The buildings are mainly constructed with concrete blocks and mud bricks.

Loss of Portions of Farmland or Tree Crops: 135 farms or patches of tree crops will be affected.

Loss of shops and business places: Of the total 472 structures to be affected by the project, 321 representing 68% are used for commercial purposes. This range from large stores, to little shops and then market stalls, kiosks or filling stations.

Displacement of People (homelessness): Some 1,042 persons from the St. John River Bridge to the Guinea border in Ganta will be displaced by the road construction work. Out of the total PAPs, 383 household heads (PAHs) were interviewed, the majority of which are males. And the majority of the affected persons are between the ages 18 – 69.

Components for which land acquisition and resettlement are required are:

• General road improvement which will affect people who have residences or businesses located along road right-of-way. • People settled in the right-of-way which will be affected by construction works during the construction process.

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

Cut-off date was essential in the process of drawing up lists to ensure that ineligible persons do not take the opportunity to claim eligibility. The cut-off date for this project was set at August 3, 2013 after the socio-economic survey and stakeholders’ consultation, making anyone who makes a claim for loss of land or any assets after this date to be ineligible for expropriation/ compensation.

4.2 Mitigation Measures In order to arrive at a mitigation plan, the PAHs have been involved in the decision-making process whereby they have been informed about their options and rights pertaining to resettlement namely:

 Cash for compensation  Land or another place  A combination of the above.

Compensation is mainly skewed towards cash compensation for structures (housing, crops, etc.) which will be affected. Cash compensation has been adopted as the mitigation measure at full replacement cost rates. And as requested by the PAHs, prompt compensation will readily enable them relocate quicker.

All of the PAHs (100%) expressed willingness to move so as to facilitate commencement of the project. They all stated that they could move anytime when requested, but a period of 3 months seems adequate. In view of the urgency to commence the project, it is important to negotiate with the PAHs sooner to facilitate earlier start date of the project.

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

5.0 PUBLIC PARTICIPATION & CONSULTATION Consultations were held with a wide range of stakeholders including community leaders, household heads, business owners, landlords, structure owners. Local authorities and leaders from various administrative levels were also consulted as part of the preliminary phase of this project. The objectives of these consultations were:

5.1 Consultations with Stakeholders Series of consultations were held with stakeholders in the areas affected by the project. Individuals, groups, and institutions interested in and potentially affected by the project were engaged in a stakeholders’ forum where issues relating to the project impacts were discussed. Key stakeholders identified in the project area include:

• County leaders; • community leaders; • households heads; • business owners; and • structure owners

A meeting was held with the County Superintendent, Superintendent Dagadu, and her office staff. This meeting was intended to notify the leaders of the project and the likely displacement to result therefrom. It was also resolved that PAHs will be adequately informed and would be allowed to participate in the process; and just compensation will be provided. Similar meeting was held with the Mayor of Ganta City and her city officials.

Two (2) meetings were held with the PAHs and other stakeholders in the project area. The meetings were held on Saturday, August 3, 2013 in Ganta City and Kpain Town at 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. respectively. During the meetings, detailed information on the cut-off-date (August 3, 2013) for the census of affected individuals, assets and resources was provided to the PAHs. Appendices 6 and 7 present the minutes of the meetings stated herein and attendances thereat. Ownership of the properties were also discussed and the mode of compensation and remedy available to the PAHs. The PAHs also elected community members at each of the meetings to serve as their representative on the Resettlement Implementation Committee.

5.1.1 Perception about the Project by Affected Persons Residents in the area were generally receptive of the road reconstruction. However, many PAHs expressed concerns over loss of homes and livelihood. Most people were doubtful about receiving adequate or any compensation, thus being made worse off than they were before the project. The most important issues over which all PAHs raised concerns were compensation for affected assets and financial assistance to ensure restoration of livelihoods.

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

5.2 Future Consultation Plan CHICO and MPW/IIU have the responsibility for conducting future public consultation and disclosure plans as necessary. The goal of the plan will be to improve decision-making through dialogue with individuals, groups and organizations having legitimate interest in the project.

These will be held prior to the payment of compensations to the individual PAHs. They will be notified about compensations due them and where to collect the compensation. They will also be notified of the start date of civil works.

5.3 Resettlement Consultation MPW undertook a comprehensive and formal negotiation process with the PAHs and other stakeholders to determine mutually agreed compensation policies, procedures and rates. The negotiation process was complemented by series of consultation and disclosure activities. The activities involved formal and informal dialogue with stakeholders and relevant agencies on implementation process. This process included:

• the formation of a Resettlement Negotiations Committee, involving all stakeholders; • collaboration between stakeholder groups at the Resettlement Negotiation Committee; • an agreement on the compensation principles, policies, procedures and rates describes in this document; • alleviating pressures, fears and anxieties of both impacted persons/households and MPW • promoting broad community support for the Project.

5.4 Disclosure of RAP Document The Resettlement Action Plan for the 32.5 kilometers from the St. John River Bridge to the Customs Office in Ganta will be disclosed in Liberia by the Ministry of Public Works, through its Infrastructure Implementation Unit (IIU) and the EPA. There will be newspaper adverts as well. Summary of the RAP will be hosted in the affected area. Copies will also be disclosed at the Administrative Building in Ganta City, Nimba County. After the in-country disclosure, the Rap will also be disclosed at the World Bank infoshop.

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

6.0 RESETTLEMENT COMPENSATION TO PROJECT AFFECTED PERSONS 6.1 Eligibility Criteria for Project Affected Persons For a person to be considered a project affected person (PAP), the property, crops or activity of the person must fall within the right-of-way designated for the construction of the Gbarnga – Ganta Highway, from the St. John River Bridge to the Customs Offices at the Guinea border within the period declared as the cut-off date. Those eligible for compensations are occupants (tenants, land and crops owners, business owners) of properties that will be partially affected or demolished.

Vulnerable people who will be considered include PAHs as female structure heads and those who are 65 or more years of age who are at risk of being deprived of productive assets such as land/house. These persons are earmarked for vulnerability assistance, in addition to other payments or assistances. A total of 133 persons were recorded as vulnerable.

Buildings and structures to be affected by the project were identified. A compensation valuation of all affected properties was carried out to assess commensurable values. However, only PAPs registered during the socio-economic and asset surveys were considered to be eligible for either the compensation or supplementary assistance. In other words, the date of commencement of the surveys, August 3, 2013 was the cut-off date for persons in the project area to be eligible for receipt of compensation or any assistance.

6.2 Consultation Consultations were held with all PAHs with structures within the project area on issues of their compensation. All properties that fall within the right-of-way from St. John Bridge to the Custom offices at the Guinean border have been captured with measurements, construction details and photos. Consultations were also held with the county and cities officials

Survey of affected persons was initiated to collect data and at the same time to inform PAPs about the project. A compensation valuation of all affected properties was carried out between July 17 and August 2, 2013 to assess commensurable values.

6.3 Valuation Process/Methodology Valuation of lost assets has been made at their Replacement Cost. This is in line with the provisions of the Operational Policy (OP) 4.12 on Involuntary Resettlement and the World Bank Handbook for preparing a resettlement action plan both of which require that PAPs should be assisted to improve their standards of living or at least to be restored to their pre-displacement levels.

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013 Some of the affected households and landholders lack legal claim for land ownership. In the valuation process, the element of land value has been omitted for such PAHs and the individual structure values given in isolation. This is as shown in the Table 6-1 below.

Table 6-1 Valuation Process Assets Process Buildings Steps  A detailed inventory of all persons, possession, assets and stock requiring resettlement is made  Accurate and real valuation of properties is undertaken.  Determination of compensation package according to valuation carried out. Recommendation:  GOL/MPW to provide compensation for affected structures Loss of Cash/Tree Crops  A detailed inventory of all cash/tree crops.  Accurate and real valuation of crops is undertaken.  Determination of compensation package according to valuation carried out. Recommendation:  GOL/MPW to provide compensation for affected crops Loss land and earning  Compensation to be paid on loss of land and income during period of relocation or disturbance to structure. Recommendation:  GOL/MPW to provide assistance for relocation and disturbance

6.4 Mode of Restitution Owners of structures and crops whose properties are affected by the project are protected by law and would receive adequate compensation for their properties. All affected properties will be compensated at present market value or replacement cost. And if the property owner is not satisfied with the offer of GOL/MPW, he/she has the option of requesting a private valuer of his/her choice to reassess the property and submit the same to MPW for consideration and final determination of the value of the property. The determined figure will be considered.

6.5 Compensation and other Assistances Land taking or property demolition typically entails compensation for land, houses, crops and other structures on that land, as well as other assistance in order to mitigate the adverse consequences that affect people and communities when they give up property for public good. The form of resettlement agreeable to the PAPs for land, structures and crops is monetary compensation to enable them relocate. The method of valuation of the structures is that set by the Real Estate Division of the Ministry of Finance and that of tree crops is that set by the Ministry of Agriculture. Title deeds of affected land will be verified through the CNDRA and Ministry of Land, Mines and Energy to ascertain land ownership.

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

This RAP intended compensation according to the following three options: (1) cash compensation (2) alternative land, or (3) combination of the both. However, as deduced from the survey, nearly all of the PAHs prefer cash compensation.

(a) Loss of structures For compensation, the affected persons are to be compensated at full replacement value for structures. There will also be payment of transportation and disturbance allowance. Majority of PAHs fall under this category. They will receive the same treatment as the private property owners as regards compensation, except payment for land.

(b) Loss of perennial and annual crops All PAHs with cash crops or trees will be compensated for the said crops/trees as per the price listing of the Ministry of Agriculture.

(c) Loss of livelihood or business income All PAHs with businesses to be relocated will receive assistance for loss of income during the relocation process.

(d) Vulnerable groups This group includes household or business heads who are female and 70 years of age or above. In addition to other compensation that will be due them, they will receive some special assistance to help them. 133 persons were identified as vulnerable.

6.6 Unit Cost Per Structure For the purpose of the survey, several structure types were categorized. Values of affected structures were determined by the prevailing market price of materials used including labor cost necessary for construction. This methodology is supported by the Regulation of the Real Estate Division of the Ministry of Finance to determine structure value. The regulation is reviewed and revised periodically based on prevailing market value and labor cost. Therefore, the prevailing rates per area of structure kind based on the materials of construction, as published in the regulation, was used to determine the rates of structures kinds for the RAP.

Eight (8) main structure kinds were identified during the survey. The unit rates of each kind are shown in Table 6-2:-

Table 6-2: Unit rates of structure kinds Structure Kinds Roof Wall Floor Storey Unit Cost US$/m2 Average Range/m2 Concrete Flat Zinc Concrete Concrete Single 15.00 10.00 – 20.00 Mud Bricks Zinc Mud Bricks Concrete Single 6.00 4.00 – 8.00 Mud Bricks Thatch Mud Bricks none/soil Single 4.50 4.00 – 5.00 Mud Dub Zinc Mud Dub none/soil Single 4.25 4.00 – 4.50 Mud Dub Thatch Mud Dub none/soil Single 3.50 3.00 – 4.00 Wooden Frame Zinc Round Pole none/soil Single 3.50 3.00 - 400 Wooden Frame Thatch Round Pole none/soil Single 2.50 2.00 – 3.00 Container none none none none

Other structures such as fences and water wells including labor cost necessary for construction were also studied to estimate unit cost based on prevailing market value. The results of the specific rates are listed in Table 6-3.

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

Table 6-3: Unit Rates for other structures Structure Kinds Unit Cost US$/m2 Fence 1.50 Fuel Station 6.50 Well $300 per well Hand Pump $2,000 per pump Graves $900 per grave

6.7 Compensation and Entitlement Matrix Provision of an adequate right-of-way for the reconstructed Gbarnga – Ganta Highway, from the St. John River to the Custom offices at the Guinea border, will adversely affect the livelihood of persons who live, work or earn their livelihood within the right-of-way that will be acquired for the project. Before the commencement of the project, there needs to be in place a mechanism for compensation of Project Affected Persons (PAPs) to avoid household economic difficulties that will result due to loss of residential houses, businesses or farm profits derived from occupying within the affected area.

For the purpose of this report, the affected persons can be adequately defined as follows:-

 Persons who have a right in structures (owners of buildings)  Persons who own cash/tree crops in the project area. (owners of crops)  Persons who use the structures or persons whose businesses, occupation or habitat are adversely affected; or  Persons whose standards of living are adversely affected as a consequence of resettlement activities.

Therefore, all those persons who are affected regardless of their legal status concerning the affected area should be considered as Project Affected Persons (PAPs). Table 6-4 shows the Compensation and Entitlement Matrix for PAPs.

Table 6-4 Compensation and Entitlement Matrix for PAPs Category of PAPs Entitlement / Compensation Type of Loss Compensation for Compensation for loss of Payment Regime

loss of structure/ Accommodation/income land or crops Owner of structure Loss of structure Replacement value Relocation and Lump sum of total transportation assistance Owner of crops Loss of crops Stipulated N/A Lump sum of total Compensation Owner of land Loss of land Replacement value N/A Lump sum of total Business owners Loss of income N/A Assistance for loss of Lump sum payment business income and Relocation Assistance Vulnerable Persons Loss of Special assistance Relocation and disturbance Lump sum payment accommodation assistance

Listings of compensation of affected persons are presented by Appendix 1.

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

6.8 Grievance Redress Mechanism

6.8.1 PAHs Right to Redress Cash compensation will be paid to all PAHs whose structures, crops and/or land are to be demolished or cleared to allow for the implementation of the project.

In the event of disagreement, the affected party may first seek recourse through the Committee set up for that purpose to implement the RAP. The PAP is allowed to engage his/her own valuer to determine the compensation due. The valuer and the Grievance Committee together with the relevant valuation will negotiate a settlement. If the PAH is still not convinced with what has been proposed, as stated above, he/she can take the case to the court for redress.

The objective of the grievance procedure stated above seeks to address the following:

 Provide PAHs with avenues for making complaint or resolve any dispute that may arise during the course of land, structure and any assets acquisition;  Ensure that appropriate and mutually acceptable corrective actions are identified and implemented to address complaints;  Verify that complainants are satisfied with outcomes of corrective actions; and avoid the need to resort to judicial proceedings.

If appropriate, the individual grievances and corrective actions will be received in the light of the project policy and procedures to determine if any changes to the current system are warranted. This review will aid in avoiding similar grievances in the future. The Grievance Redress Committee will be set up by the Committee for the implementation of the RAP, which will include representative of the affected towns , commissioner/chief, member of civil society organization, etc.

6.8.2 Grievance Procedure The Committee implementing the RAP will set up the grievance handling body. Every grievance must be recorded and communicated to the committee for action or for recording purposes. Once compensation and relocation are complete, no grievance will be received from said PAHs.

The contact details of the members of the RAP Grievance Committee are included as Appendix 4.

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

7.0 RESPONSIBLE AGENCIES FOR RAP IMPLEMENTATION, MONITORING & EVALUATION

7.1 RAP Implementation Implementation of the RAP will involve relevant institutions with experience in displacement and resettlement programs. These institutions, as shown in Figure 8-1, will include (1) Ministry of Public Works/Infrastructure Implementation Unit, (2) General Auditing Commission (GAC), (3) Liberia Refugee Repatriation and Resettlement Commission (LRRRC), (4) The Ministry of Lands, Mines & Energy (MLME) (5) Ministry of Finance (MOF), (6) The Internal Audit Secretariat (IAS); and (7) EPA. The respective roles of the institutions involved in implementation of the RAP are as follows:

MPW/IIU: The Ministry of Public Works/Infrastructure Implementation Unit, as supervisory entity to ensure reconstruction of the Gbarnga – Ganta Highway, will coordinate and supervise the activities of the Committee.

MOF: This institution will provide the funding for the implementation of the RAP.

GAC: This institution will be responsible to ensure that there is transparency and accountability on funds provided for the RAP implementation.

LRRRC: This institution will assist with the resettlement of all PAPs.

MLME: This ministry will verify the demarcation of all disputed land boundaries.

IAS: Thee secretariat is responsible to ensure that spending of the government is expedient and that there is value for money. Its role is to ensure careful spending of money.

EPA: The EPA will be responsible to assess the environmental suitability of proposed actions including choice of resettlement areas.

Figure 8-1: RAP implementing entities.

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

7.2 Internal Review, Monitoring & Evaluation Some of the risks that will be associated with resettlement in this case is wrongful payment of compensation, deletion of rightful PAHs from the process, impoverishment and destitution caused by inappropriate spending of compensation money by some heads of households. There is possibility of profligate spending of compensation money by the head of households, to the detriment of other members of the household, The team will continue to sensitize and ensure that households understand the purpose for the compensation and use it for the right purpose. Other risks involve the breaking up of social cohesion and loss of access to community facilities.

Hence, there will firstly be an internal review process to be conducted by the IIU to ensure that all those listed on the compensation listing are qualified and certified. It is to these PAHs that payment will be made. Further, an external monitor should be selected to conduct the external monitoring and evaluation stage to strengthen consistency and follow-up of the whole project process. Earth Environmental Consultancy will work in an advisory role for the implementation committee and report accordingly.

Continuous evaluation is necessary for the identification of problems and difficulties occurring after the process of implementation. Monitoring and evaluation will pay special attention to vulnerable groups, such as female and the aged family heads. Baseline data from the socio- economic survey and census of the PAHs will be used as the control data measuring improvements or deterioration of the PAHs relocation, after displacement.

Monitoring will focus on:  Information about PAHs post compensation and entitlement spending;  Relevance of relocation RAP implementation timetable to what actually took place moving out of the site.  Content of grievances, efficiency of procedures and accountability in handling the grievance; and  Use of compensation money for those who “invested” it in profit-making enterprises.

7.2.1 Performance Monitoring Indicators. These indicators measure inputs, outputs, and outcome relative to the resettlement activities. The indicators shall include:  Number and categories of affected people compensated  Number of owners of structures compensated  Number of owners of cash crops compensated.  Number of owners of land compensated  Adherence to schedules for compensation  Resolved cases of complaints and grievances  Accuracy of payment records  Number of businesses which have restarted

7.2.2 Reporting The independent monitoring reports will be prepared by the Implementation Committee; and final report to follow at the end of the resettlement process.

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

8.0 BUDGET, SOURCE OF FUNDING AND TIME SCHEDULE FOR IMPLEMENTING RAP

8.1 Budget for Implementing the RAP The budget values presented in this RAP assume a standard permanent house, even when it is temporary, to comply with the requirement of the provision of World Bank policy for preparing resettlement action plan, which outlines that PAHs should be assisted to improve their standards of living or at least to restore them to their pre-displacement levels.

The total cost for compensation and resettlement of PAHs for structures in the affected area amounts to US$1,335,617.50. This total is based on the assessed value of the structures in accordance with the rates presented in the Real Estate Properties Evaluation of the Ministry of Finance. The cost for loss of cash/tree crops is US$212,582.82. This total is based on the stipulated prices for damaged crops as presented by the Ministry of Agriculture. The cost for loss of business income is US$15,650.00. Each PAH with business to be relocated was given US$50.00. Most of the business owners are petty traders, with some engaged in general merchandise. This amount was estimated as a bi-weekly profit for a general merchandise business. The cost for Relocation/Transportation Allowance is US$23,250.00. Each PAH with residential structure to be relocated was given US$50.00. This was estimated as the cost to transport a household of five (5) persons over a distance of 50 kilometers and most of the PAHs have smaller household and are not expected to resettle beyond this distance. Relocation amount was also paid for wells and hand pumps. The cost for Assistance to Vulnerable Persons is US$6,600.00, as each vulnerable PAP was given US$50.00. The cost for the implementation, monitoring and evaluation is US$10,000.00. Out of this amount, US$2,500.00 will be used by the Verification Team, which will comprise of 10 members. Each member will receive a daily stipend of US$50.00 to cover cost of accommodation and feeding. Another amount of US$2,500.00 will be used by the Pay Team to cover the cost of accommodation, feeding and fuel for the payment process. The remaining amount of US$5,000.00 will be used for the hiring of equipment and purchase of fuel for the demolition of structures within the project area. There is no cost for land as no PAHs has produced genuine deed for land. Should there be need for payment for land or additional structures/crops in future; amount set aside in contingency will be used.

Implementation of this RAP will be financed by the Government of Liberia, through MPW/IIU. Compensation will be paid directly to the affected parties by the RAP Implementation Committee. Appropriate mechanism will be put in place to ensure timely flow of funds for the RAP activities. Tables 8-1, 8-2 and 8-3 present budget estimates for costs associated with different phases of the RAP, including implementation, compensation, monitoring and evaluation.

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

Table 8-1: Budget for the Implementation of the RAP:

Estimated Source of Cost Item Cost(US$) Comments Funding Compensation to Affected Persons Compensation will be paid for loss of complete or partial structures on affected areas. This is estimated using the formulation of the GOL/MPW/IIU Compensation for all structures 1,335,617.50 Real Estate Division of Ministry of Finance. Compensation for loss of business Compensation will be paid to owner of businesses that will be income 15,650.00 relocated or disturbed during the implementation of the project. GOL/MPW/IIU Relocation/Transport Assistance 23,250.00 Amount to assist PAHs relocate from the project area GOL/MPW/IIU Assistance to Vulnerable Persons 6,600.00 Amount to assist vulnerable persons GOL/MPW/IIU Compensation for affected land - Amount will be taken from contingency in future GOL/MPW/IIU Compensation for affected crops 212,582.82 Amount to PAHs for affected cash/tree crops GOL/MPW/IIU

SUB-TOTAL: $1,593,700.32

Implementation, Monitoring & Evaluation 2,500.00 Amount to be utilized for the transportation, accommodation Verification Team and feeding of the Verification Team GOL/MPW/IIU Amount to be utilized for the transportation, accommodation 2,500.00 Pay Team and feeding of the Pay Team GOL/MPW/IIU Amount to be used for the hiring of demolition equipment 5,000.00 and provision of fuel for the demolition of all structures Demolition within the project area. GOL/MPW/IIU SUB-TOTAL: $10,000.00 Contingency: (2.5% of Sub-Totals) $40,092.51 TOTAL RAP BUDGET: $1,643,792.83

Table 8-2: Budget Cost for Phase One of the RAP No Items/Activities No. Unit Total Cost (US$)

1 Concrete Structures 107 769,790.50

2. Mud Bricks/Zinc Roof 157 423,984.25 3. Mud Bricks/Thatch Roof 7 20,422.00 4. Mud Dub/Zinc Roof 34 65,295.00

5. Mud Dub/Thatch Roof 13 7,691.50 6. Wooden Frame/Zinc Roof 115 48,209.75 7. Wooden Frame/Thatch Roof 24 6,916.50

8. Others 15 38,808.00 9. Cash/Tree Crops 212,582.82 Sub-Total: 1,593,700.32

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

8-3: Budget Cost for Phase Two of the RAP. Phase Two: Implementation, Monitoring & Evaluation

No Items/Activities Total Cost (US$) 11. Verification Team (Accommodation, Feeding & Transportation) 2,500.00 12. Pay Team (Accommodation, Feeding & Transportation) 2,500.00 13. Demolition (Equipment hiring and fuel) 5,000.00 SUB-TOTAL: 10,000.00 14. Contingency (2.5%) 40,092.51 GRAND-TOTAL: 1,643,792.83

The total amount of One Million Six Hundred Forty Three Thousand Seven Hundred Ninety Two United States Dollars and Eighty Three Cents (US$1,643,792.83) is required for the implementation of the RAP. Of this amount, US$1,593,700.32 will be paid directly to PAHs. The remaining amount is intended for supervising the implementation of the RAP, monitoring and evaluation.

During the internal review process, all PAHs will be provided with a census registration card that will make them eligible for payment, and serve as a means of identification. PAPs will be obliged to present a copy of their cards during payment. Notification of compensation will include locations where payments will be made, amount to be paid, the time and date of payment as well as the beneficiaries of such payment.

8.2 Time Schedule for the RAP Implementation The time period for the implementation of the RAP is estimated below, as indicated in Table 8-4. The implementation period takes into account important variables such as detailed asset survey and negotiation with APAs. It also provided for resolution of conflicts and grievances and cash flow from GOL/MPW/IIU to the PAHs. Time schedule and summary of activities is presented in the Table 8-4 below.

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

Table 8 - 4: Implementation Schedule of the RAP Responsible Agency No. RAP Activity (Institution) Target Date Socio-economic Survey/ RAP 1 Commencement CHICO/EEC July - Aug. 2013 2 Stakeholder Meetings CHICO/EEC July - Aug. 2013 Detailed Assets Survey and 3 Compensation Estimation IIU/MPW July - Aug. 2013 Negotiation with PAHs & RAP Budget 4 Approval IIU/MPW April 2014 5 RAP Approval WB May 2014 6 RAP Disclosure IIU/MPW & WB May - June 2014 7 Grievances/Complaints Redress IIU/MPW & PAPs After Disclosure 8 RAP Compensation Payment IIU/MPW After Disclosure Relocation of Project Affected Persons 9 (PAPs) PAPs After Disclosure 10 Completion of Relocation of PAPs IIU/MPW & PAPs After Disclosure Demolition Exercise of Affected After Disclosure 11 Structures IIU/MPW RAP Implementation Completion After Disclosure 12 Report IIU/MPW

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

R E F E R E N C E S

Earth Environmental Socio-economic Survey Report of the Gbarnga - Consultancy, Inc. Ganta Highway (July – August, 2013).

Liberia Institute of Republic of Liberia – 2008 National Population Statistics & Geo-Infor- & Housing Census Final Results mation Services (LISGIS) Monrovia, Liberia; May 2009

Ministry of Planning & Lift Liberia Poverty Reduction Strategy - Economic Affairs Final Report: A Results-Focused Assessment (June 2008 – December 2011);

Geographic Maps of Liberia

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

APPENDICES

APPENDIX 1: Compensation/Replacement Payment to Owners of Affected Structures Relocation Assistance to PAHs of Residential Structures Loss of Income & Relocation Assistance to PAHs of Commercial Structures and Assistance to Vulnerable PAPs APPENDIX 2: Compensation to Owners of Cash/Tree Crops APPENDIX 3: Survey Questionnaires – Residential, Commercial & Farm/Crops APPENDIX 4: Names/Contacts of Members of Resettlement Implementation Committee APPENDIX 5: Minutes & Attendance of Consultation Meeting in Ganta of August 3, 2013 APPENDIX 6: Minutes & Attendance of Consultation Meeting in Kpein of August 3, 2013

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

APPENDIX- 1

Compensation/Replacement Payment to Owners of Affected Structures Relocation Assistance to PAHs of Residential Structures Loss of Income & Relocation Assistance to PAHs of Commercial Structures and Assistance to Vulnerable PAPs

Nature of Structure Number of Verified Relocation Loff of Busi- Assistance to Total No. Structure ID Name of Principal Contact or Property KIND OF Structure Dependents Employees Value Assistance ness Income Vulnerable Payment 1 GGRP-NC-B-0001 Government of Liberia Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 8820 50 8870 2 GGRP-NC-B-0001A Government of Liberia Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 5400 5400 3 GGRP-NC-B-0002 Mailan Gaye Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 1512 50 50 1612 4 GGRP-NC-B-0004 Anita Tokpah Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 250 50 50 350 5 GGRP-NC-B-0005 Sabastine Nakor Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 160 50 210 6 GGRP-NC-B-0006 T. Girl Massalay Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 1452 50 50 1552 7 GGRP-NC-B-0007 Yei K. Lanor Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 2100 50 50 2200 8 GGRP-NC-B-0007A Mary Kerkular Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1596 50 1646 9 GGRP-NC-B-0009 Annie N. Flomo Commercial Mud Dub w/Zinc Roof 3 112 50 50 212 10 GGRP-NC-B-0009A John Moore Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 5616 50 5666 11 GGRP-NC-B-0010a Yei Baar Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 4 3240 50 50 3340 12 GGRP-NC-B-0010b Yei Baar Residential Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 252 50 302 13 GGRP-NC-B-0010c Yei Baar Commercial Mud Dub w/Zinc Roof 1 84 50 134 14 GGRP-NC-B-0011 Kelven Beibli Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 2 84 50 134 15 GGRP-NC-B-0012 Victoria Beibli Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 660 50 50 760 16 GGRP-NC-B-0013 Morris Beibli Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 7 5628 50 5678 17 GGRP-NC-B-0013A Kelven Beibli Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 4392 4392 18 GGRP-NC-B-0015 Chris N Darwon Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 2 2070 50 2120 19 GGRP-NC-B-0016 Mary Sahn Commercial Wood Frame w/Thatch Roof 1 144 50 50 244 20 GGRP-NC-B-0017 Owner Not Present Commercial Mud Dub w/Thatch Roof 120 50 170 21 GGRP-NC-B-0019 Anthony Wehdah Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 156 50 206 22 GGRP-NC-B-0020 Marie Glomeh Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 156 50 50 256 23 GGRP-NC-B-0021 Lincoln Totoe Residential Mud Dub w/Zinc Roof 2 936 50 100 1086 24 GGRP-NC-B-0022 Emmanuel Teah Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 98 50 148 25 GGRP-NC-B-0024 Moses K Dee Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 2 1840 50 1890 26 GGRP-NC-B-0025 Mary Sahn Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 3 1728 50 50 1828 27 GGRP-NC-B-0026 Mary sahn Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 260 50 310 28 GGRP-NC-B-0027 Mary sahn Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 1938 50 1988 29 GGRP-NC-B-0028 Mary sahn Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 250.25 50 300.25 30 GGRP-NC-B-0029 Venecial Whykor Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 4 1440 50 1490 31 GGRP-NC-B-0030 Venecial Whykor Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 97.5 50 147.5 32 GGRP-NC-B-0032 Prince Yini Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 200 50 250 33 GGRP-NC-B-0033 Anita Cooper Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 242 50 50 342 34 GGRP-NC-B-0033A Annvy Cooper Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 2520 2520 35 GGRP-NC-B-0033B Cecelia Gono Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 3576 50 3626 36 GGRP-NC-B-0034 Rebecca Swen Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 216 50 266 37 GGRP-NC-B-0035 Joseph S D Suah Residential Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 10500 50 10550 38 GGRP-NC-B-0036 Joseph S D Suah Residential Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 56000 50 56050 39 GGRP-NC-B-0037 Philip Shola Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 1350 50 1400 40 GGRP-NC-B-0038 Victor Dahn Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 180 50 230 41 GGRP-NC-B-0039 Nohn Yini Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 4 1020 50 1070 42 GGRP-NC-B-0040 Nohn Yini Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 6144 50 6194 43 GGRP-NC-B-0041 Nohn Yini Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Thatch Roof 72 50 122 Nature of Structure Number of Verified Relocation Loff of Busi- Assistance to Total No. Structure ID Name of Principal Contact or Property KIND OF Structure Dependents Employees Value Assistance ness Income Vulnerable Payment 44 GGRP-NC-B-0042 Nohn Yini Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 96 50 146 45 GGRP-NC-B-0043 Otis Dro Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 180 50 230 46 GGRP-NC-B-0045 Laykaryee Nyeingar Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 1200 50 50 1300 47 GGRP-NC-B-0046 Edwin Flomo Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 50 50 100 48 GGRP-NC-B-0046A Sylvester Kpai Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 5016 5016 49 GGRP-NC-B-0047 Mamie Jackson Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 2 192 50 50 292 50 GGRP-NC-B-0048 Dorris Dokie Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 126 50 50 226 51 GGRP-NC-B-0048A Nohn R. Kidau Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 5070 50 5120 52 GGRP-NC-B-0049 Irene Gono Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 423.5 50 50 523.5 53 GGRP-NC-B-0050 Prince Yini Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 160 50 210 54 GGRP-NC-B-0050A Nohn R. Kidau Other Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 672 672 55 GGRP-NC-B-0050B Nohn R. Kidau Other Others 300 300 56 GGRP-NC-B-0051 Kou Momo Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Thatch Roof 4 4554 50 50 4654 57 GGRP-NC-B-0052 Sakpa Sarty Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 3675 50 3725 58 GGRP-NC-B-0053 Princess Goyigba Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 84 50 50 184 59 GGRP-NC-B-0054 W. Alfred Dahn Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 1536 50 1586 60 GGRP-NC-B-0055 Anthony Tokpah Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 338 50 388 61 GGRP-NC-B-0056 Jestina Bomah Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 3 6012 50 6062 62 GGRP-NC-B-0056A Tetee Wehdah Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 2520 50 2570 63 GGRP-NC-B-0057 Joyline Teah Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 2 50 50 100 64 GGRP-NC-B-0059 Lincoln Glay Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 3 22500 50 22550 65 GGRP-NC-B-0059A J. Saye Gondah Other Others 2000 2000 66 GGRP-NC-B-0060 Nyanama Nyan Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 108 50 158 67 GGRP-NC-B-0063 Secret B Suah Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 2 160 50 50 260 68 GGRP-NC-B-0070 Peter R Saye Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 220 50 270 69 GGRP-NC-B-0071 Floyd Tomah Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 5720 50 5770 70 GGRP-NC-B-0072 Loretta Kasaryan Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 180 50 50 280 71 GGRP-NC-B-0073 Kishore Gubani Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 10800 50 10850 72 GGRP-NC-B-0074 Kishore Gubani Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 22545 50 22595 73 GGRP-NC-B-0075a Alex Tarpleh Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 4 4725 50 4775 74 GGRP-NC-B-0075b Semento Harward Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 4 4725 50 4775 75 GGRP-NC-B-0076 Tito Yormie Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 4788 50 4838 76 GGRP-NC-B-0077 Justina Yormin Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 20420 50 50 20520 77 GGRP-NC-B-0078 Gumpue Kargon Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 630 50 680 78 GGRP-NC-B-0079 Mohammed Kromah Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 11520 50 11570 79 GGRP-NC-B-0080 Mohammed Kromah Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 9450 50 9500 80 GGRP-NC-B-0081 James T. Wleyon Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 11730 50 11780 81 GGRP-NC-B-0082 Augustus Menkoah Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 3780 50 50 3880 82 GGRP-NC-B-0083 Paul Zourpeawon Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 2 2280 50 2330 83 GGRP-NC-B-0084 Victoria Varr Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 1800 50 50 1900 84 GGRP-NC-B-0085 Steve Johnny Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 11880 50 50 11980 85 GGRP-NC-B-0085A Steve Johnny Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 432 432 86 GGRP-NC-B-0086 Louise Cooper Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 210 50 50 310 Nature of Structure Number of Verified Relocation Loff of Busi- Assistance to Total No. Structure ID Name of Principal Contact or Property KIND OF Structure Dependents Employees Value Assistance ness Income Vulnerable Payment 87 GGRP-NC-B-0087 Pharaze Dekpah Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 112 50 162 88 GGRP-NC-B-0088 Pharaze Dekpah Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 147 50 197 89 GGRP-NC-B-0089 Fatu Kaizie Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 11655 50 50 11755 90 GGRP-NC-B-0090 Othello Z G Johnson Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 13545 50 13595 91 GGRP-NC-B-0090A Jerry Gonyon Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 702 50 752 92 GGRP-NC-B-0091 Julius Gontor Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 540 50 590 93 GGRP-NC-B-0092 Albert Paye Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 2800 50 2850 94 GGRP-NC-B-0093 Ernest Doitoe Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 2622 50 50 2722 95 GGRP-NC-B-0094 Koko Laywhyee Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 5700 50 50 5800 96 GGRP-NC-B-0094A Sampson Seabo Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 540 540 97 GGRP-NC-B-0095 Deno Kpantebee Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 3105 50 3155 98 GGRP-NC-B-0096 Cellcom Sub-Office Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 4485 50 4535 99 GGRP-NC-B-0097 Yah Tumpia Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 1680 50 50 1780 100 GGRP-NC-B-0098 Lawrance Baamie Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 5610 50 5660 101 GGRP-NC-B-0099 Fredrick Gaylay Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 1425 50 1475 102 GGRP-NC-B-0100 Vicky F. Cooper Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 3828 50 50 3928 103 GGRP-NC-B-0101 Joseph Czegarr Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 540 50 590 104 GGRP-NC-B-0102 Margret Gortor Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 2052 50 50 2152 105 GGRP-NC-B-0103 Garmie Mulbah Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 2448 50 50 2548 106 GGRP-NC-B-0104 John Kwoan Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 3696 50 3746 107 GGRP-NC-B-0104A Augustine Troh Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 648 50 698 108 GGRP-NC-B-0105 Lorina Zackpah Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 4200 50 50 4300 109 GGRP-NC-B-0106 Esther Togbah Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 1440 50 50 1540 110 GGRP-NC-B-0107 Omie Jallah Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 1824 50 50 1924 111 GGRP-NC-B-0108 Paul Kollie Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 1632 50 1682 112 GGRP-NC-B-0109 Allen Doloking Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 442 50 492 113 GGRP-NC-B-0110 Abraham Benson Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 6270 50 6320 114 GGRP-NC-B-0111 Henrietta Punni Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 5280 50 50 5380 115 GGRP-NC-B-0112 Elton Cooper Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 560 50 610 116 GGRP-NC-B-0113 Albert Martin Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 2244 50 2294 117 GGRP-NC-B-0114 Paye D Gondah Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 2484 50 2534 118 GGRP-NC-B-0115 Prince L Dorlan Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 1188 50 1238 119 GGRP-NC-B-0116 Dee Corner Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 3 2700 50 2750 120 GGRP-NC-B-0117 Angeline Tokpah Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 1836 50 50 1936 121 GGRP-NC-B-0118 George Kolleh Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 2520 50 2570 122 GGRP-NC-B-0119 Emmanuel Dolo Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 2 2160 50 2210 123 GGRP-NC-B-0120 Kou B Yinni Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 1296 50 150 1496 124 GGRP-NC-B-0121 Mohammed Barry Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 8 648 50 698 125 GGRP-NC-B-0122 Jeff V. Miapue Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 1800 50 1850 126 GGRP-NC-B-0123 Cyrus Gblee Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 2 936 50 986 127 GGRP-NC-B-0124 Asata Kromah Commercial Mud Dub w/Zinc Roof 1 956.25 50 50 1056.25 128 GGRP-NC-B-0125 Fanta Jabateh Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 75 50 50 50 225 129 GGRP-NC-B-0126 Jacob Begbon Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 252 50 302 Nature of Structure Number of Verified Relocation Loff of Busi- Assistance to Total No. Structure ID Name of Principal Contact or Property KIND OF Structure Dependents Employees Value Assistance ness Income Vulnerable Payment 130 GGRP-NC-B-0127 Ouma Jolloh Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 315 50 365 131 GGRP-NC-B-0128 Marcus M. Paye Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 3 2160 50 50 2260 132 GGRP-NC-B-0129 Felecia Leamah Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 202.5 50 50 302.5 133 GGRP-NC-B-0130 Henry Porte Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 2880 50 2930 134 GGRP-NC-B-0131 Samuka Dolley Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 2 1064 50 1114 135 GGRP-NC-B-0133 Fanta Jabateh Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 340 50 50 440 136 GGRP-NC-B-0134 Musa Jabateh Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 6 2280 50 2330 137 GGRP-NC-B-0135 Musa Jabateh Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 1566 50 1616 138 GGRP-NC-B-0136 Vofee Jabateh Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 2 612 50 662 139 GGRP-NC-B-0137 Vofee Jabateh Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 1632 50 1682 140 GGRP-NC-B-0138 Mark Karpeh Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 2346 50 2396 141 GGRP-NC-B-0139 Ducor Petrolum Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 3 3000 50 3050 142 GGRP-NC-B-0140 George Cooper Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 2640 50 2690 143 GGRP-NC-B-0141 George Cooper Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 864 50 914 144 GGRP-NC-B-0142 Yah M Taryor Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 3 1065 50 50 1165 145 GGRP-NC-B-0143 Musa M Kromah Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 7752 50 7802 146 GGRP-NC-B-0144 Othello Johnson Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 2 2500 50 2550 147 GGRP-NC-B-0145 Papa Zeo Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 594 50 644 148 GGRP-NC-B-0146 Jefferson Winston Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 1716 50 1766 149 GGRP-NC-B-0147 George Krulah Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 3 720 50 770 150 GGRP-NC-B-0149 Yah Gorbgoyee Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 1674 50 1724 151 GGRP-NC-B-0150 Abraham Tulbert Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 1920 50 1970 152 GGRP-NC-B-0151 Linda Bembo Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 2 1200 50 50 1300 153 GGRP-NC-B-0152 Prince Karnue Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 3 1260 50 1310 154 GGRP-NC-B-0154 Owner Not Present Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 9,720 50 9770 155 GGRP-NC-B-0155 Ladia Meipea Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 72 50 122 156 GGRP-NC-B-0156 Lawrance Paye Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 2 2442 50 50 2542 157 GGRP-NC-B-0157 Beverlyn Zoku Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 96 50 50 196 158 GGRP-NC-B-0158 Paul Kollie Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 7614 50 7664 159 GGRP-NC-B-0159 Peter Kollie Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 2 343 50 393 160 GGRP-NC-B-0160 Yah Leesalah Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 112 50 50 212 161 GGRP-NC-B-0161 Yah Leesalah Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 144 50 194 162 GGRP-NC-B-0162 Yah Tumpia Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 2016 50 2066 163 GGRP-NC-B-0164 Emmanuel Gbah Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 2 1512 50 1562 164 GGRP-NC-B-0165 Saye Dolo Residential Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 2 432 50 482 165 GGRP-NC-B-0166 Sarah Garnett Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 2 975 50 50 1075 166 GGRP-NC-B-0167 Owner Not Present Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 162 50 212 167 GGRP-NC-B-0168 Hawa V. Suah Commercial Wood Frame w/Thatch Roof 3 198 50 50 298 168 GGRP-NC-B-0168A Koffi Keita Other Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 5580 5580 169 GGRP-NC-B-0169 Sunny Yormie Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 272.25 50 322.25 170 GGRP-NC-B-0170 Admed Phas Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 1260 50 1310 171 GGRP-NC-B-0171 Hawa Kollie Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 162 50 50 262 172 GGRP-NC-B-0172 Owner Not Present Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 202.5 50 252.5 Nature of Structure Number of Verified Relocation Loff of Busi- Assistance to Total No. Structure ID Name of Principal Contact or Property KIND OF Structure Dependents Employees Value Assistance ness Income Vulnerable Payment 173 GGRP-NC-B-0174 Dorothy Gonor Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 222.75 50 50 322.75 174 GGRP-NC-B-0177 Garmai Gbozee Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 420 50 50 520 175 GGRP-NC-B-0177A James Wuo Other Others 2000 2000 176 GGRP-NC-B-0179 Daniel B. Sehyboa Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 3900 50 50 4000 177 GGRP-NC-B-0180 Alfred K. Flomo Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 7524 50 7574 178 GGRP-NC-B-0181 Anderson Sahn Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 5250 50 5300 179 GGRP-NC-B-0182 Saye B. Flomo Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 3 5616 50 5666 180 GGRP-NC-B-0183 Saye B. Flomo Residential Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 2 220 50 270 181 GGRP-NC-B-0184 Mercy Leday Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 432 50 50 532 182 GGRP-NC-B-0184A Musa Kamara Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 9450 9450 183 GGRP-NC-B-0185 Yah Pertahn Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 101.25 50 50 201.25 184 GGRP-NC-B-0186 Oveta Kwiti Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 260 50 50 360 185 GGRP-NC-B-0187 Hannah Kokeh Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 144 50 50 244 186 GGRP-NC-B-0188 Ruth Dolo Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 2 312 50 150 512 187 GGRP-NC-B-0189 Betty Kwiti Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 84 50 50 184 188 GGRP-NC-B-0191 Saye A. Gofan Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 3 7032 50 7082 189 GGRP-NC-B-0192 Yei Sendolo Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 216 50 50 316 190 GGRP-NC-B-0193 Yei Sendolo Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 7308 50 7358 191 GGRP-NC-B-0193A Mendoyaweh Kpayili Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 5100 5100 192 GGRP-NC-B-0194 Victor P. Sahn Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 8892 50 100 9042 193 GGRP-NC-B-0195 Nathan Domah Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 4 456 50 506 194 GGRP-NC-B-0196 Enoch Domah Commercial Mud Dub w/Zinc Roof 1 748 50 798 195 GGRP-NC-B-0197 Michael Korqui Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 1890 50 1940 196 GGRP-NC-B-0198 Eric Saye Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Thatch Roof 1 528 50 578 197 GGRP-NC-B-0199 James Mulbah Residential Mud Dub w/Zinc Roof 981.75 50 1031.75 198 GGRP-NC-B-0200 Saye T. Sendolo Residential Mud Dub w/Zinc Roof 1 1249.5 50 1299.5 199 GGRP-NC-B-0201 Titus G. Tarkpor Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 198 50 248 200 GGRP-NC-B-0202 Kou Luogan Residential Mud Dub w/Zinc Roof 1 1377 50 50 1477 201 GGRP-NC-B-0203 James Gbolue Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Thatch Roof 3 1216 50 1266 202 GGRP-NC-B-0203A John Nuah Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 5544 5544 203 GGRP-NC-B-0204 Moses Voah Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 2 1428 50 1478 204 GGRP-NC-B-0205 Moses Voah Residential Wood Frame w/Thatch Roof 1 198 50 248 205 GGRP-NC-B-0206 Patricia Gbolue Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 2160 50 50 2260 206 GGRP-NC-B-0206A Ernest Glay Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 4500 4500 207 GGRP-NC-B-0207 Joseph Yahn Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 3 1140 50 1190 208 GGRP-NC-B-0208 Vofee Jabateh Residential Mud Dub w/Zinc Roof 2 1326 50 1376 209 GGRP-NC-B-0208A Roosevelt Faryen Residential Mud Dub w/Zinc Roof 3206 3206 210 GGRP-NC-B-0209 Martha Zawalo Residential Mud Dub w/Zinc Roof 1 1215.5 50 50 1315.5 211 GGRP-NC-B-0210 Alfred Kolla Residential Mud Dub w/Zinc Roof 3 357 50 407 212 GGRP-NC-B-0211 J. Otosco Nyumah Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 3654 50 3704 213 GGRP-NC-B-0212 Oliver Venn Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 3 1350 50 1400 214 GGRP-NC-B-0213 Kou Goaneh Residential Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 2 360 50 150 560 215 GGRP-NC-B-0214 Abraham Bleeh Residential Mud Dub w/Thatch Roof 1 1197 50 1247 Nature of Structure Number of Verified Relocation Loff of Busi- Assistance to Total No. Structure ID Name of Principal Contact or Property KIND OF Structure Dependents Employees Value Assistance ness Income Vulnerable Payment 216 GGRP-NC-B-0215 Gapee Lackeh Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 2 3600 50 3650 217 GGRP-NC-B-0215A Emmanuel Seclo Grave Others 9900 9900 218 GGRP-NC-B-0216 Kou Nehlay Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 2 2352 50 2402 219 GGRP-NC-B-0216A Saye Gonganue Residential Mud Dub w/Zinc Roof 3570 50 3620 220 GGRP-NC-B-0217 Emmanuel Crabbe Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 6630 50 6680 221 GGRP-NC-B-0218 Alice David Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Thatch Roof 5 6630 50 50 6730 222 GGRP-NC-B-0219 Alice David Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 3 1716 50 1766 223 GGRP-NC-B-0220 Sunday boy Gbadiah Residential Mud Dub w/Zinc Roof 1 858 50 908 224 GGRP-NC-B-0220A Big-Boy Brown Residential Mud Dub w/Zinc Roof 3800 50 3850 225 GGRP-NC-A-0003 P. Shelton Gweh Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 4 1606.5 50 1656.5 226 GGRP-NC-A-0004 Albert Lanor Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 4 3450 50 3500 227 GGRP-NC-A-0005 Mama massaquoi Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 2 416 50 466 228 GGRP-NC-A-0006 Saye Gondah Other Others 300 300 229 GGRP-NC-A-0012 Beatrice Benson Commercial Wood Frame w/Thatch Roof 1 84 50 50 184 230 GGRP-NC-A-0016 Lucial Kolleh Commercial Mud Dub w/Thatch Roof 1 128 50 50 228 231 GGRP-NC-A-0017 Henry Paye Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 468 50 100 618 232 GGRP-NC-A-0018 Moses Paye Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 6 1995 50 2045 233 GGRP-NC-A-0019 J. Saye Gondah Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 5 7290 50 7340 234 GGRP-NC-A-0020 J. Saye Gondah Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 504 50 554 235 GGRP-NC-A-0020A J. Saye Gondah Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 4368 50 4418 236 GGRP-NC-A-0020B J. Saye Gondah Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 2112 50 2162 237 GGRP-NC-A-0021 J. Saye Gondah Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 283.5 50 333.5 238 GGRP-NC-A-0022 Emmanuel Diggs Residential Mud Dub w/Zinc Roof 2 1857.25 50 1907.25 239 GGRP-NC-A-0023 C. Blasewah Gaye Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 7 4050 50 4100 240 GGRP-NC-A-0025 Janjay Cole Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 540 50 590 241 GGRP-NC-A-0028 Esther Dahn Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 220 50 270 242 GGRP-NC-A-0034 Lisa Konkah Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 198 50 50 298 243 GGRP-NC-A-0035 Lisa Konkah Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 180 50 230 244 GGRP-NC-A-0037 Janet Kolleh Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 2 864 50 914 245 GGRP-NC-A-0039 Elvis Gweh Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 2 1680 50 1730 246 GGRP-NC-A-0042 Joe Kolonight Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 336 50 386 247 GGRP-NC-A-0045 Joe Kolonight Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 2268 50 2318 248 GGRP-NC-A-0048 Blessing Gweh Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 2 72 50 122 249 GGRP-NC-A-0049 James Flomo Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 84 50 134 250 GGRP-NC-A-0050 Owner Not Present Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 72 50 122 251 GGRP-NC-A-0051 Elizabeth Lobai Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 128 50 50 228 252 GGRP-NC-A-0052 Richell Mankoah Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 80 50 130 253 GGRP-NC-A-0053 Richell Mankoah Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 112 50 162 254 GGRP-NC-A-0054 Fenah Zuku Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 98 50 50 198 255 GGRP-NC-A-0055 Fenah Zuku Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 2 84 50 134 256 GGRP-NC-A-0057 Flomo Delamu Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 200 50 250 257 GGRP-NC-A-0058 Rose Kehdon Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 550 50 50 650 258 GGRP-NC-A-0058A Levely Doyen Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 576 50 626 Nature of Structure Number of Verified Relocation Loff of Busi- Assistance to Total No. Structure ID Name of Principal Contact or Property KIND OF Structure Dependents Employees Value Assistance ness Income Vulnerable Payment 259 GGRP-NC-A-0059 Habakkuk P. Yeanay Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 7254 50 7304 260 GGRP-NC-A-0059A Habakkuk P. Yeanay Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 360 360 261 GGRP-NC-A-0060 Saye Suah Residential Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 12240 50 12290 262 GGRP-NC-A-0061 Mohammed Keita Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 1860 50 1910 263 GGRP-NC-A-0062 Peter Chima Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 2520 50 2570 264 GGRP-NC-A-0063 Mohammed Keita Commercial Wood Frame w/Thatch Roof 1 312 50 362 265 GGRP-NC-A-0063A Siaka Keita Residential Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 5040 50 5090 266 GGRP-NC-A-0064 George B. Saye Residential Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 14175 50 14225 267 GGRP-NC-A-0065 John Koillie Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 495 50 545 268 GGRP-NC-A-0066 Kiada Cessay Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 160 50 50 260 269 GGRP-NC-A-0067 George B. Saye Residential Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 10755 50 10805 270 GGRP-NC-A-0068 Abraham S Donzo Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 344 50 394 271 GGRP-NC-A-0068A Abraham S Donzo Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 3846 50 3896 272 GGRP-NC-A-0069 George B. Saye Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 15960 50 16010 273 GGRP-NC-A-0070 George B. Saye Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 8835 50 8885 274 GGRP-NC-A-0071 George B. Saye Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 11385 50 11435 275 GGRP-NC-A-0072 George B. Saye Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 11160 50 11210 276 GGRP-NC-A-0073 Prince Haward Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 2 25500 50 25550 277 GGRP-NC-A-0074 Malcom Poden Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 1296 50 1346 278 GGRP-NC-A-0075 Barshir Hamoud Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 36540 50 36590 279 GGRP-NC-A-0076 Bill D. Delamu Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 30150 50 30200 280 GGRP-NC-A-0077 Winifred Gausi Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 2 9180 50 9230 281 GGRP-NC-A-0078 Richard Acquah Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 5 11340 50 11390 282 GGRP-NC-A-0079 Bashir Hamoud Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 25800 50 25850 283 GGRP-NC-A-0080 Bashir Hamoud Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 18300 50 18350 284 GGRP-NC-A-0081 Alphonso Glaydor Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 14335 50 14385 285 GGRP-NC-A-0082 Alphonso Glaydor Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1700 50 1750 286 GGRP-NC-A-0083 G. Matthew Tuah Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 2 5950 50 6000 287 GGRP-NC-A-0084 Owner Not Present Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 5780 50 5830 288 GGRP-NC-A-0085 Winifred Gausi Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 3 4760 50 4810 289 GGRP-NC-A-0086 Fred Suah Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 8670 50 8720 290 GGRP-NC-A-0087 Prince Henries Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 5 4845 50 4895 291 GGRP-NC-A-0088 Pharaze Dekpah Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 2 2640 50 2690 292 GGRP-NC-A-0089 Abraham Barry Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 720 50 770 293 GGRP-NC-A-0090 Mustapha Jalloh Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 2 1080 50 1130 294 GGRP-NC-A-0091 Fedes Koleh Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 2 1080 50 1130 295 GGRP-NC-A-0092 Arthur M. Dolo Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 2 7170 50 7220 296 GGRP-NC-A-0093 Harris Yeanay Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 2280 50 2330 297 GGRP-NC-A-0094 George Duo Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 2 5400 50 5450 298 GGRP-NC-A-0095 Betty Gbala Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 6 2808 50 2858 299 GGRP-NC-A-0096 Mitchell Garsaye Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 2 576 50 626 300 GGRP-NC-A-0098 Owner Not Present Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 175 50 225 301 GGRP-NC-A-0099 Jeffson Mantor Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 3 252 50 302 Nature of Structure Number of Verified Relocation Loff of Busi- Assistance to Total No. Structure ID Name of Principal Contact or Property KIND OF Structure Dependents Employees Value Assistance ness Income Vulnerable Payment 302 GGRP-NC-A-0100 Irene Tiah Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 396 50 446 303 GGRP-NC-A-0101 Harry Tiah Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 2070 50 2120 304 GGRP-NC-A-0102 Fohn Taryor Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 2208 50 2258 305 GGRP-NC-A-0103 Paye G. Taryor Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 2 3534 50 3584 306 GGRP-NC-A-0104 Musu Quoi Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 2 4140 50 4190 307 GGRP-NC-A-0104A Nohn Tensonnon Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1932 1932 308 GGRP-NC-A-0105 Mama Cooper Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 1980 50 2030 309 GGRP-NC-A-0106 Nathan Suah Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 1980 50 2030 310 GGRP-NC-A-0107 Alfred Katurah Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 2 1980 50 2030 311 GGRP-NC-A-0108 Amarah Donzo Other Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 17580 50 17630 312 GGRP-NC-A-0109 Margaret Carson Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 2 3696 50 50 3796 313 GGRP-NC-A-0110 Aaron S Gboko Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 4605 50 4655 314 GGRP-NC-A-0111 Saye Larkpor Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 2376 50 2426 315 GGRP-NC-A-0112 UBA Bank Commercial Others 3770 50 3820 316 GGRP-NC-A-0113 UBA Bank Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 26,700 50 26750 317 GGRP-NC-A-0114 Habakkuk Z. Gonquoi Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 96 50 146 318 GGRP-NC-A-0115 Habakkuk Z. Gonquoi Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 2 1008 50 1058 319 GGRP-NC-A-0115A Peter Glay Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 5928 5928 320 GGRP-NC-A-0116 Martin Gberdieh Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 2 1140 50 1190 321 GGRP-NC-A-0117 Betty Weah Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 2 1482 50 50 1582 322 GGRP-NC-A-0118 Kebbeh Vah Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 2 2208 50 50 2308 323 GGRP-NC-A-0119 Veraline Wesseh Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 1452 50 50 1552 324 GGRP-NC-A-0120 Albert Jackson Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 2 462 50 512 325 GGRP-NC-A-0121 Jenkins Cooper Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 2 2052 50 2102 326 GGRP-NC-A-0122 Vassebah S. Kromah Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 2 1716 50 1766 327 GGRP-NC-A-0123 Albert Brown Residential Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 6 5040 50 5090 328 GGRP-NC-A-0124 Mark Flomo Jr Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 2 1728 50 1778 329 GGRP-NC-A-0125 Alvin Sayetee Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 384 50 434 330 GGRP-NC-A-0127 Abraham Moore Commercial Others 576 50 626 331 GGRP-NC-A-0128 Marcus M. Paye Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 672 50 722 332 GGRP-NC-A-0129 Angeline Tokpah Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 1872 50 1922 333 GGRP-NC-A-0130 Abraham Moore Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 1872 50 1922 334 GGRP-NC-A-0131 Abraham Moore Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 4095 50 4145 335 GGRP-NC-A-0132 Abraham Moore Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 1782 50 1832 336 GGRP-NC-A-0133 Ericson Larkpor Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 2 1998 50 2048 337 GGRP-NC-A-0134 Kabeh Mulbah Commercial Mud Dub w/Zinc Roof 2 1309 50 1359 338 GGRP-NC-A-0135 George B. Saye Commercial Others 2 1200 50 1250 339 GGRP-NC-A-0136 Annie Sarty Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 2 5355 50 5405 340 GGRP-NC-A-0137 Tony Togba Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 242 50 292 341 GGRP-NC-A-0138 Habakkuk Kidau Commercial Mud Dub w/Zinc Roof 1 1083.75 50 1133.75 342 GGRP-NC-A-0140 Lincoln Dokpa Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 2 6642 50 50 6742 343 GGRP-NC-A-0141 Martha Dolo Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 280 50 330 344 GGRP-NC-A-0142 Hezekiah Jackson Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 6 3528 50 3578 Nature of Structure Number of Verified Relocation Loff of Busi- Assistance to Total No. Structure ID Name of Principal Contact or Property KIND OF Structure Dependents Employees Value Assistance ness Income Vulnerable Payment 345 GGRP-NC-A-0143 Amelia Karwhen Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 2 2508 50 2558 346 GGRP-NC-A-0144 William Kerkulah Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 4608 50 4658 347 GGRP-NC-A-0145 Larry Joe Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 160 50 210 348 GGRP-NC-A-0146 Mitchell Mills Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 4 50 50 349 GGRP-NC-A-0147 James S. Harris Jr Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 2 2610 50 2660 350 GGRP-NC-A-0148 Albert O. Brown Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 672 50 722 351 GGRP-NC-A-0150 Junior Weamie Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 600 50 650 352 GGRP-NC-A-0151 Owner Not Present Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 50 50 353 GGRP-NC-A-0153 Jackson Dolo Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 585 50 635 354 GGRP-NC-A-0154 Labista Flomo Commercial Wood Frame w/Thatch Roof 2 288 50 338 355 GGRP-NC-A-0155 Jenifer Kakia Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 840 50 50 940 356 GGRP-NC-A-0156 Yusuf Kamara Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 480 50 530 357 GGRP-NC-A-0157 Rufus Nobeh Residential Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 2160 50 2210 358 GGRP-NC-A-0158 Rufus Nobeh Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 2 2520 50 2570 359 GGRP-NC-A-0160 Nyah Tuayen Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 2 612 75 50 737 360 GGRP-NC-A-0161 Levi Yeebahn Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 2 1530 50 1580 361 GGRP-NC-A-0164 Betty T. Konah Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 200 50 50 300 362 GGRP-NC-A-0165 Martin Sekwai Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 648 50 698 363 GGRP-NC-A-0165A Peter Yeanay Other Others 2000 2000 364 GGRP-NC-A-0166 Prince Queeglay Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 4 2112 50 2162 365 GGRP-NC-A-0167 Kou Barlue Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 247.5 50 50 347.5 366 GGRP-NC-A-0168 Saye Zarweah Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 2 225 50 275 367 GGRP-NC-A-0169 Prince Korquoi Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 196 75 50 321 368 GGRP-NC-A-0170 Jeremiah Kaung Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 562.5 50 612.5 369 GGRP-NC-A-0171 Government of Liberia Commercial Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 1320 50 1370 370 GGRP-NC-A-0172 Nya Sekwai Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 2 780 50 830 371 GGRP-NC-A-0173 Nya Sekwai Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 2 7350 50 7400 372 GGRP-NC-A-0174 Nohn Gonleyen Residential Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 100 50 50 200 373 GGRP-NC-A-0175A Kou Menyaseh Grave Others 10800 10800 374 GGRP-NC-A-0176 Nohn Gonleyen Residential Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 160 50 210 375 GGRP-NC-A-0177 Nohn Kokai Residential Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 128 50 178 376 GGRP-NC-A-0178 Wuo Sekwai Residential Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 200 50 50 300 377 GGRP-NC-A-0180 Finee Sekwai Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 220 50 50 320 378 GGRP-NC-A-0182 Chero Sayegeh Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 2 2016 50 50 2116 379 GGRP-NC-A-0183 Williams Sayegeh Commercial Mud Dub w/Zinc Roof 2 1360 50 1410 380 GGRP-NC-A-0184 Grace Yeaney Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 2 330 50 50 430 381 GGRP-NC-A-0185 Sarah Bembo Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 160 50 50 260 382 GGRP-NC-A-0186 Saye Duanyean Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 4 2016 50 2066 383 GGRP-NC-A-0187 Patrick Bembo Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 242 50 292 384 GGRP-NC-A-0188 Yei Bembo Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 112 50 50 212 385 GGRP-NC-A-0189 Irene Gaye Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 144 50 50 244 386 GGRP-NC-A-0190 Rufus Nawel Residential Others 1 300 50 350 387 GGRP-NC-A-0191 Prince Wonyenneh Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 90 50 140 Nature of Structure Number of Verified Relocation Loff of Busi- Assistance to Total No. Structure ID Name of Principal Contact or Property KIND OF Structure Dependents Employees Value Assistance ness Income Vulnerable Payment 388 GGRP-NC-A-0192 Prince Yeanay Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 2 128 50 50 228 389 GGRP-NC-A-0193 Rufus Nawel Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 4 5568 50 5618 390 GGRP-NC-A-0194 John B. Yeaney Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 6 2736 50 2786 391 GGRP-NC-A-0195 Oretha Sahn Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 180 50 50 280 392 GGRP-NC-A-0196 Darlingboy Suah Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 126 50 176 393 GGRP-NC-A-0197 James Sayewaa Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 1254 50 1304 394 GGRP-NC-A-0197A Preston Brooks Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 6012 6012 395 GGRP-NC-A-0198 Rachel Young Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 300 50 50 400 396 GGRP-NC-A-0199 Nyan Glagasia Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1800 50 1850 397 GGRP-NC-A-0200 Femmie Sahn Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 2 570.5 50 50 670.5 398 GGRP-NC-A-0201 Emmanuel Kwiti Residential Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 50 50 399 GGRP-NC-A-0202 James Weaver Residential Mud Dub w/Zinc Roof 2 10050 50 10100 400 GGRP-NC-A-0207 Babygirl Langa Residential Wood Frame w/Thatch Roof 4 160 50 50 260 401 GGRP-NC-A-0208 Junior Langa Residential Wood Frame w/Thatch Roof 4 247.5 50 297.5 402 GGRP-NC-A-0209 John B Mulbah Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Thatch Roof 4 6156 50 6206 403 GGRP-NC-A-0210 Francis Gbenquoi Commercial Wood Frame w/Thatch Roof 1 840 50 890 404 GGRP-NC-A-0210A Rufus Pratt Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 5220 50 5270 405 GGRP-NC-A-0211 Nyanqui Felix Residential Wood Frame w/Thatch Roof 3 180 50 230 406 GGRP-NC-A-0212 Christian Baker Residential Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 1 13230 50 13280 407 GGRP-NC-A-0213 Philip Dumbar Residential Mud Dub w/Zinc Roof 3 1428 50 1478 408 GGRP-NC-A-0214 Richard Tokpah Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 230 50 280 409 GGRP-NC-A-0215 Richard Tokpah Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 2 7200 50 7250 410 GGRP-NC-A-0215A Alpha Jalloh Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 6480 50 6530 411 GGRP-NC-A-0216 Kou Kerkulah Residential Mud Dub w/Zinc Roof 1 6240 50 50 6340 412 GGRP-NC-A-0217 Isaac Sherman Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 4 3960 50 4010 413 GGRP-NC-A-0218 Isaac Sherman Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 1 1326 50 50 1426 414 GGRP-NC-A-0219 Kou Sherman Residential Mud Dub w/Thatch Roof 2 654.5 50 704.5 415 GGRP-NC-A-0220 Amos Beger Residential Mud Dub w/Thatch Roof 2 1249.5 50 1299.5 416 GGRP-NC-A-0221 Nathaniel Amos Residential Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 2 722.5 50 772.5 417 GGRP-NC-A-0221A Nya Seekie Residential Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof 5400 50 5450 418 GGRP-NC-A-0222 Deborah Zeon Commercial Wood Frame w/Thatch Roof 2 240 50 50 340 419 GGRP-NC-A-0223 Robert Sayon Residential Others 1 315 50 365 420 GGRP-NC-A-0224 Simeon Diggs Commercial Mud Dub w/Zinc Roof 1 1326 50 1376 421 GGRP-NC-A-0225 Prince Peter Residential Mud Dub w/Zinc Roof 2 1445 50 1495 422 GGRP-NC-A-0226 Cooper Wintiah Residential Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 2 1785 50 100 1935 423 GGRP-NC-A-0227 Oliver Mornie Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 245 50 295 424 GGRP-NC-A-0228 Veena Dolo Commercial Wood Frame w/Thatch Roof 2 135 50 50 235 425 GGRP-NC-A-0228A Romeo Dahn Other Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 6138 6138 426 GGRP-NC-A-0229 Marcella Mornie Commercial Wood Frame w/Thatch Roof 1 135 50 50 235 427 GGRP-NC-A-0230 Mohn Paye Commercial Wood Frame w/Thatch Roof 1 135 50 50 235 428 GGRP-NC-A-0231 Rebecca Wanto Commercial Wood Frame w/Thatch Roof 1 135 50 50 235 429 GGRP-NC-A-0232 Yah Blonia Commercial Wood Frame w/Thatch Roof 1 135 50 50 235 430 GGRP-NC-A-0233 Annie Baar Commercial Wood Frame w/Thatch Roof 1 135 50 50 235 Nature of Structure Number of Verified Relocation Loff of Busi- Assistance to Total No. Structure ID Name of Principal Contact or Property KIND OF Structure Dependents Employees Value Assistance ness Income Vulnerable Payment 431 GGRP-NC-A-0234 Regina Suah Commercial Wood Frame w/Thatch Roof 1 135 50 50 235 432 GGRP-NC-A-0235 Rebecca Tawan Commercial Wood Frame w/Thatch Roof 2 135 50 50 235 433 GGRP-NC-A-0236 Julie Boayue Commercial Wood Frame w/Thatch Roof 1 120 50 50 220 434 GGRP-NC-A-0237 Eva Boayu Commercial Wood Frame w/Thatch Roof 2 135 50 50 235 435 GGRP-NC-A-0238 Mealy Dolo Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 280 50 50 380 436 GGRP-NC-A-0239 Hamilton Suah Jr Commercial Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 2 2622 50 2672 437 GGRP-NC-A-0240 Mamie Sayebeah Commercial Wood Frame w/Thatch Roof 1 225 50 50 325 438 GGRP-NC-A-0241 Noawai Menyen Residential Mud Dub w/Zinc Roof 2 918 50 50 1018 439 GGRP-NC-A-0242 J.Otasco Nyumah Residential Mud Dub w/Zinc Roof 2 2737 50 2787 440 GGRP-NC-A-0243 Kou P. Voker Commercial Others 1547 50 1597 441 GGRP-NC-A-0244 Nancy Keman Residential Mud Dub w/Zinc Roof 2 1759.5 50 50 1859.5 442 GGRP-NC-A-0244A Mitchell Zuagele Other Others 2300 2300 443 GGRP-NC-A-0245 Kessereel Zayzay Residential Mud Dub w/Thatch Roof 1 315 50 365 444 GGRP-NC-A-0246 Moses Singbah Residential Mud Dub w/Thatch Roof 2 630 50 680 445 GGRP-NC-A-0247 Musu Johns Commercial Mud Dub w/Thatch Roof 1 270 50 50 370 446 GGRP-NC-A-0248 Franklin Henry Residential Mud Dub w/Thatch Roof 2 490 50 540 447 GGRP-NC-A-0249 Lawrence Belah Residential Mud Dub w/Thatch Roof 4 955.5 50 1005.5 448 GGRP-NC-A-0250 Cooper Zawolo Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Thatch Roof 2 816 50 866 449 GGRP-NC-A-0251 Susannah Saye Residential Mud Dub w/Zinc Roof 2 476 50 50 576 450 GGRP-NC-A-0251A Saye Gbalazeh Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 510 50 560 451 GGRP-NC-A-0252 Alphonso Menneh Residential Mud Dub w/Thatch Roof 2 392 50 442 452 GGRP-NC-A-0253 Alphonso Menneh Residential Mud Dub w/Thatch Roof 2 350 50 400 453 GGRP-NC-A-0254 Emmanuel Crabbe Residential Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 3307.5 50 3357.5 454 GGRP-NC-A-0255 Emmanuel Crabbe Residential Mud Dub w/Zinc Roof 1 459 50 509 455 GGRP-NC-A-0256 Emmanuel Crabbe Residential Mud Dub w/Zinc Roof 1 773.5 50 823.5 456 GGRP-NC-A-0256A Josiah Boam Residential Mud Dub w/Zinc Roof 576 576 457 GGRP-NC-A-0257 Peter Suah Residential Mud Dub w/Zinc Roof 2 3672 50 3722 458 GGRP-NC-A-0258 Peter Suah Residential Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 2 210 50 260 459 GGRP-NC-A-0259 James S. Paye Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 5 1176 50 1226 460 GGRP-NC-A-0260 James S. Paye Residential Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 160 50 210 461 GGRP-NC-A-0261 James S. Paye Residential Mud Dub w/Zinc Roof 3 1768 50 1818 462 GGRP-NC-A-0262 Abraham Sonnie Residential Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 202.5 50 252.5 463 GGRP-NC-A-0263 Abraham Sonnie Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 5 1440 50 1490 464 GGRP-NC-A-0263A Emmanuel Gergeh Other Others 1200 1200 465 GGRP-NC-A-0264 Yamah Frank Residential Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 210 50 50 310 466 GGRP-NC-A-0265 Susannah Sonnie Commercial Wood Frame w/Thatch Roof 1 140 50 50 240 467 GGRP-NC-A-0266 Matthew Y. Kollie Residential Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof 4 3720 50 3770 468 GGRP-NC-A-0267 Deborah Sonnie Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 2 250 50 50 350 469 GGRP-NC-A-0267A Abou Jalloh Other Mud Dub w/Zinc Roof 3230 3230 470 GGRP-NC-A-0268 Massa Kromah Commercial Mud Dub w/Thatch Roof 1 90 50 50 50 240 471 GGRP-NC-A-0269 Evelyne Garteh Commercial Wood Frame w/Thatch Roof 1 225 50 50 325 472 GGRP-NC-A-0270 Nue Barbar Commercial Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof 1 1 1134 50 1184 0 137 107 248 411 1335618 23250 15650 6600 1381117.5 Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

APPENDIX – 2

Compensation to Owners of Cash/Tree Crops

Verified Amount NO NAME OF PRINCIPAL CONTACT Kind of Cash/Tree Crops Quantity 1 Nancy Kemon Banana, Oil Palm 2, 3 16.07 2 Richard Acquah Banana 75 126.75 3 Moses Mamyen Banana, Rubber 125, 25 823.25 4 J. Otosco Nyumah Rubber 50 1,224.00 5 Rancy Goaneh Rubber, Banana 150, 70 3,790.30 6 Fofee Jabateh Plantain 175 470.75 7 Morris Duogou Rubber 150 3,672.00 8 Nyahn Yarkpah Oil Palm 18 76.14 9 Nyah Yahdolo Rubber 115 2,815.20 10 Lawrence P. George Rubber 150 3,672.00 11 Milton Lavalah Rubber, Mango 105, 4 2,682.40 12 Joseph Gogbey Rubber 150 3,672.00 13 Joseph Gogbey Rubber 225 5,508.00 14 Tupee Cooper Rubber 85 2,080.80 15 Tupee Cooper Rubber, Banana 125, 22 3,097.18 16 Josiah lackeh Rubber 300 7,344.00 17 Josiah lackeh Rubber 65 1,591.20 18 Peter Sahn Rubber 150 3,672.00 19 Sundayboy Gbadiah Rubber 50 1,224.00 20 Sundayboy Gbadiah Rubber 500 12,240.00 21 Sundayboy Gbadiah Rubber 75 1,836.00 22 Sundayboy Gbadiah Rubber 175 4,284.00 23 Sundayboy Gbadiah Rubber 175 4,284.00 24 Peter Martor Rubber 213 5,214.24 25 Owner Not Present Rubber, Mango 125, 4 3,172.00 26 F. Augustus Ceasus Jr Oil Palm, Pawpaw, Mango 20, 10, 1 188.40 27 Yah Venn Rubber 153 3,745.44 28 Shadrick K. Gbuseh Rubber 112 2,741.76 29 Edward A. Messah Rubber 105 2,570.40 30 Isaac Sheman Banana 180 304.20 31 Cyrus Mator Oil Palm, Pawpaw 1, 3 26.97 32 Nyan Sekwai Rubber 38 930.24 33 Nyan Sekwai Rubber 19 465.12 34 Christian Baker Rubber, Plaintain, Pineapple 200, 250, 86 5,405.36 35 Ernest Zune Oil Palm, Pineapple 4, 19 36.11 36 Cecelia Gondo Banana, Plaintain 43, 65 182.52 37 Nonie Totoe Oil Palm, Mango 10, 4 69.70 38 Owner Not Present Rubber 75 1,836.00 39 James Weaver Rubber, Banana, Plaintain 200, 50, 35 5,039.65 40 Otiga Gbongai Rubber, Plaintain, Pawpaw 49, 12, 2 1,234.96 41 Dorris Paye Banana, Plaintain, Pineapple 75, 13, 50 1,236.24 42 Paye Domah Rubber 75 1,836.00 43 Paye Suo Oil Palm, Plaintain 35, 12 168.33 44 Sylvester Zune Oil Palm 5 21.15 45 Emmanuel Siaway Oil Palm 5 21.15 46 Ruth Kakia Oil Palm 2 17.89 47 Nyanqui Felex Plaintain, Pineapple, Pawpaw 55, 4, 5 134.89 48 John Mulbah Rubber, 100, 2,448.00 49 Otis Kuty Rubber, Banana, Pineapple 150, 14, 50 3,746.16 50 Joseph Saye Oil Palm 10 42.30 51 Kelvin Zigbuo Oil Palm, Plaintain, Orange 3, 43, 2 253.36 52 Alex Zune Pineapple, Orange 54, 2 222.54 53 Sheriff Paye Oil Palm, Plaintain, Pineapple 12, 15, 15 91.26 54 Saye Takie Rubber 50 1,224.00 55 Ernest Domah Rubber, Pawpaw 80, 10 2,034.20 56 Owner Not Present Banana, Oil Palm, Mango 80, 6, 2 216.58 57 Mark David Oil Palm, Mango 8, 5 173.84 58 Richard Brown Oil Palm, Plaintain, Mango 2,9,3 107.67 59 Patience Bleh Mango 5 140 60 Saye Suah Orange, Mango 1, 3 168.00 61 Pst James Fred Banana, Oil Palm, Pawpaw, Mango 6, 4, 3, 2 133.8 62 Moses K. Gayewon Oil Palm, Mango 8, 2 89.84 63 Beatrice Benson Mango 2 56.00 64 Nonie Totoe Oil Palm, Mango 2, 4 120.46 65 Jerry O. Paye Banana, Oil Palm 80, 5 275.2 66 C.Blasewah Gaye Oil Palm, Pawpaw, Mango 2, 2, 2 79.62 67 J. Saye Gondah Oil Palm, Mango 4, 2 72.92 68 Lawrence Baamin Oil Palm, Mango 8, 5 173.84 69 Yei Baar Oil Palm, Mango 9, 2 94.07 Verified Amount NO NAME OF PRINCIPAL CONTACT Kind of Cash/Tree Crops Quantity 70 Kumou Momoh Banana, Oil Palm, Mango 20, 4, 4 152.56 71 Eric Saye Banana, Plaintain, Mango 130, 75, 2 402.45 72 Moses Vann Plaintain, Pineapple 50, 5 89.55 73 Joseph Yahn Mango 4 112 74 Enoch Bomah Oil Palm 3 12.69 75 Naton Domah Banana, Oil Palm 10, 3 29.59 76 Saye A Gofon Banana 100 169.00 77 Ruth Dolo Banana, Oil Palm, Plaintain 25, 8, 25 118.34 78 Wuo Yeanue Oil Palm, Plaintain, Mango 16, 60, 2 225.08 79 David Mayeadomah Mango, Oil Palm 3, 4 100.92 80 Owner Not Present Mango 6 168.00 81 Zarwolo Beibli Mango 6 168 82 Hon George N Domah Oil Palm 9 38.07 83 Esther Lumba Oil Palm, Plaintain 32, 26 179.3 84 Owner Not Present Orange, Mango 1, 2 140 85 Alexander Whykor Banana, Pawpaw 85, 8 204.29 86 Yei Lanor Cocoa, Kola 11, 2 150.22 87 Morris Beibli Oil Palm, Plaintain 4, 13 38.89 88 sundaygirl Swen Oil Palm, Mango 2, 1 36.46 89 Mary Sahn Oil Palm, Plaintain 6, 86 256.72 90 Fandal David Banana, Oil Palm, Pawpaw 70, 3, 12 221.95 91 Wilson W Mator Rubber, Banana 96, 15 2,375.43 92 Owner Not Present Pineapple 90 90.90 93 Alice David Banana, Oil Palm 17, 3 41.42 94 Joseph Martor Rubber 102 2,496.96 95 Sundayboy Gbadiah Rubber 80 1,958.40 96 Sundayboy Gbadiah Rubber 350 8,568.00 97 Sundayboy Gbadiah Rubber 500 12,240.00 98 Sundayboy Gbadiah Rubber 300, 3 7,366.74 99 Yah Feahn Rubber 350 8,568.00 100 Napoleon Cooper Rubber 75 1,836.00 101 Josiah lackey Rubber 350 8,568.00 102 Milton Lavaleh Rubber, Oil Palm 125, 75 3,377.25 103 Nya Bleeh Rubber 75 1,836.00 104 David Goaneh Rubber, Banana 200, 27 4,941.61 105 Paye G Vatikeh Rubber 175 4,284.00 106 Williams K Nulah Oil Palm, Mango 1, 4 116.23 107 Kebbeh Flomo Oil Palm, Mango 2, 2 64.46 108 Comfort Torbort Plaintain, Pineapple, Mango 1, 2, 2 59.71 109 Kou Paye Oil Palm, Mango 5, 1 49.15 110 Zotawon Jacob Oil Palm, Mango 4, 5 156.92 111 Lincoln Totoe Oil Palm 2 8.46 112 Lorpu Budy Mango 1 28.00 113 John Moore Oil Palm, Plaintain, Mango 8, 37, 6 264.37 114 marie Vorkpor Banana, Plaintain 30, 30 101.4 115 Darlington Gbopaye Oil Palm 6 25.38 116 John Mulbah Banana 27 45.63 117 John Paye Rubber, Banana 100 2,448.00 118 Oscar Venn Rubber 80 1,958.40 119 Bigboy Mulbah Banana, Pawpaw 29, 3 71.75 120 Rebecca Saye Banana, Oil Palm 15, 4 42.27 121 Celey Zeayon Oil Palm, Plaintain 7, 4 36.37 122 Wilson Payezon Rubber 80 1,958.40 123 Isaac Sheman Rubber 125 3,060.00 124 Gabriel Winny Rubber, Banana, Mango 150, 40, 2 3,795.60 125 Saye Memoe Oil Palm, Pawpaw 6, 8 33.46 126 Harrison Saam Pineapple 15 15.15 127 Lamina Bangura Rubber, Banana, Oil Palm 30, 12, 3 767.37 128 Alfred Saam Rubber, 100 2448 129 Jacob Yelegon Rubber 100 2448 130 Korpo S. Dolo Banana, Plaintain 19, 50 116.61 131 Ruth Zamsey Rubber, Oil Palm 26, 4 653.4 132 Marthline Venn Oil Palm 6 25.38 133 David Menyen Rubber 50 1,224.00 134 Rufus Kollie Plaintain, Pawpaw 10, 1 24.48 135 Fandal David Banana, Pawpaw 70, 12 209.26 TOTAL: 212,582.82 Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

APPENDIX – 3

Survey Questionnaires – Residential, Commercial & Farm

Survey – Construction of Gbarnga-Ganta Road Project

Commercial Location: Gbarnga/Ganta-Guinea Border Structure No.: GGRP-

Left Side Right Side Date: Page 1 of 1

Location: GPS Coodinate: ______District:______Photo No.:

Name of Primary Contact: Contact Number:______Ownership: Own: ______Rent: ______Lease: ______Other: ______Do you have Title Deed Yes ( ) No ( ) When was the premises purchased or constructed:

Type Structure: Residential Building Floor Area Concrete Block w/Zinc Roof, ______Floor: ______Sq. M. Concrete Block w/Thatch Roof, ______Floor: ______Sq. M. Wood Frame w/Zinc Roof, ______Floor: ______Sq. M. Wood Frame w/Thatch Roof, ______Floor: ______Sq. M. Mud/Brick Block w/Zinc Roof, ______Floor: ______Sq. M. Mud/Brick Block w/Thatch Roof, ______Floor: ______Sq. M. Other, describe: Assessed Value of Property:

How long have you worked at this place? ______months / years Where did you work before:______Do you like working here? Yes_____ No _____ Do you support developmental projects? ( ) Yes ( ) No Would you move to allow any project? ( ) Yes ( ) No If yes, how soon?_____year; ______months; _____weeks How far do you travel to work/school? ____km; medical services?____ km; place of worship? ___ km What is your preferred mode of transportation? ___Taxi; ___ Bus; ___Bike; ___Priv. vehicle What is your preferred mode of resettlement?____ Cash; ___Alternative Land; ___Land & Cash

Demographic Data Education Occupation/ Male Name Age Level Source of Income Religion Tribal Affiliation 1 2 3 4 Education Occupation/ Female Name Age Level Source of Income Religion Tribal Affiliation 1 2 3 4

Total Annual Income

principleContact/ Owner (sign off) Attach additional pages, if needed. Survey – Construction of Gbarnga-Ganta Road Project Residential Location:Gbarnga/Ganta- Guinea Border Structure No.: GGRP- Left Side Right Side Date: Page 1 of 1

Location: GPS Coodinate: ______District:______Photo No.:

Name of Primary Contact: Contact Number:______Ownership: Own: ______Rent: ______Lease: ______Other: ______Do you have Title Deed Yes ( ) No ( ) When was the premises purchased or constructed:

How long have you lived at this place? ______months / years Where did you live before:______Do you like living here? Yes_____ No _____ Do you support developmental projects? ( ) Yes ( ) No Would you move to allow any project? ( ) Yes ( ) No If yes, how soon?_____year; ______months; _____weeks How far do you travel to work/school? ____km; medical services?____ km; place of worship? ___ km What is your preferred mode of transportation? ___Taxi; ___ Bus; ___Bike; ___Priv. vehicle What is your preferred mode of resettlement?____ Cash; ___Alternative Land; ___Land & Cash

Total Household Annual Income:______Attach additional pages, if needed. Survey – Construction of the Gbarnga/ Ganta-Guinea Border

Farm/Trees/Crops/Grave Farm No.: GGRP- - Page 1 of 1 Location: GPS Coodinate (UTM): ______Photo No.: Location:Gbarnga/Ganta-Guinea Border District:______Left Side Right Side

Kind of Trees/Crops Productive Unproductive Total Number of Trees/Crops Assessed Value Rubber ______Cocoa ______Coffee ______Citrus ______Cassava ______Coconut ______Kola ______Avocado ______Breadfruit ______Banana/Plantain ______Oil Palm ______Plantain ______Pineapple ______Sugar Cane ______Other:______TOTAL: ______

GRAVE: Relationship to Household 1 ______2 ______3 ______4 ______5 ______

Principal Contact/Owner (sign-off):______Date:______

Attach additional pages, if needed.

D:\Earth\CHICO\Ganta Road\CHICO Survey Form.xls Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

APPENDIX - 4

Names/Contacts of Members of Resettlement Grievance Committee

Members of the Resettlement Grievance Committee

No Name Cell# Institution Function in Function in Institution Committee 1 Nicholas Perkins 0886-516337 LRRRC Chief of Chairman of the Protection Committee who presides over

2 Kojo Ross 0886-529703 LRRRC Refugee Pro- Sociologist tection Officer 3 Lydia Kollie LRRRC Resettlement Officer

34 Henry Mah 0886-450087 MPW Valuator Valuator

45 Rupert Taylor 0886-522532 MLM&E Surveyor Land Dispute Officer 6 Lovete Konah MLM&E 7 Sebastian Weah MOF Financial Officer Financial Officer 8 H. Gopee Coleman MOF Financial Officer Financial Officer 9 Rosetta Griggs-Cholopry GAC Auditor Auditor 10 Edward Neblett 0886-524002 EPA Environmentalist Environmentalist 11 Varney Conneh 0886-531029 EPA Environmentalist Environmentalist 12 David Carter 0886-525170 MPW Zoning Officer Zoning Expert 13 David L. Wiles 0886-527484 IIU Environmentalist Environmentalist 14 Stephen Kolee 0886-608763 IIU Safeguard Officer Safeguard Officer 15 Supt. Office -Nimba Member

16 Mayor Off.- Ganta Member

17 PAP Representative Ganta City Member 18 PAP Representative Kpein Town Member 19 Resident Engineer Nimba County Member

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

APPENDIX - 5

Minutes & Attendance of Consultation Meeting in Ganta of August 3, 2013

1. Gbarnga-Ganta Road Project 1.1Scoping Consultative Meeting Minutes

MEETING:GANTA CITY VENUE: METHODIST GUM

DATE: Aug 3,2013 TIME:12:00 mid-Day

Issue/s Raised Participant concerned Response -So how will the Mr Lahaison Warity (public work’ County Engineer) Government deal with GEORGE B, SAYE It is not that these measurements are not on the the issue of land, if the book, but at time some surveyors do make errors. land is deeded, which Howbeit, you will be justly compensated for your was done by the land, once the land is deeded and your structure as Government Herself, well, should the project affect it. just to fine out our structures are being demolished for the construction of the road. Seymour Dweh(Earth Environmental) -Will the road only be constructed from At the moment, the project is considering from Gbarnga to Guinea Gbarnga to the border of Guinea. Border? What’s about the road leading to Yekepa?

Do the government Stephen s. Jonnie Mr Lahaison Warity (public work County Engineer) have Zoning standard Yes, there is a set standard and it has not been for rural area? change, it is just that the Government has not been enforcing these standard.

I want to understand Seymour Dweh (Earth Environmental) how you intend to To be clear we are not the court, and we don’t address properties issue Mohammed Kromah intend getting involved in issue of such until either that has some ongoing parties’ fine a solution dispute and are found within the project area? The County Authorities will be involved into every Considering the fact that stage of this project. you will need a primary owner. During your survey, did Prince Mannah Seymour Dweh (Earth Environmental you request the property my team first requested the name of the owner, and legitimate owner or you later requested the name of the primary contact or only recorded the the person we met. person you met? What if I own a structure G. Matthew Tuah Seymour Dweh (Earth Environmental that is being rented by The exercise does involve the owner of the land business people, will the that is deeded, structure owner as well as those exercise only be renting, and leasing. concern about the owner alone or it’s involve the tenant as well? If my structure is G. Matthew Tuah Seymour Dweh(Earth Environmental affected just a little by This is only determine by the dimension taken of the project will you the structure, if it undermines the structure durability demolish the entire we collect the entire building, otherwise we only building? record the affected portion.

How do you determine The resettlement benefit goes to the tenant, or the who gets what should person who’s leasing while the owner gets the the owner, tenant or one structural value and land compensation if he owns whose leasing be place both. on the same form?

Will the Government Dee corner Absolutely not, the Government will not rebuild any rebuild my structure that one structure that might be demolish, but I can has been affected by assure you a just payment of your properties and the road project? resettlement packages before these demolishing exercises take place. My structure that is C.Blasewah Gaye Seymour Dweh(Earth Environmental ) affected contain You just mention that your structure contain a shop residential and a shop, and a dwelling place, so No there will be only one will I be compensated compensation because its one roof. for both? If my land and structure Moriken kenneh City mayor is affected by the Yes, you will have to resurvey because you will project, do I have to need to follow Government standard this time resurvey before reconstructing ? What are some John F Williams Mr Lahaison Warity (public work’ engineer) mechanism put in order This is why the Government is saying through the to avoid the demolishing ministry of public’s work that before you construct or of properties in the erect you must obtain a permit from the ministry. future because there are many roads that are needed to be build?

All of the questions of the attendances were answered. And the meeting ended at 2:35 p.m.

PICTORIAL OF MEETING

Resettlement Action Plan for Gbarnga – Ganta Highway – Nimba County August 2013

APPENDIX – 6

Minutes & Attendance of Consultation Meeting in Kpein of August 3, 2013

1. Gbarnga-Ganta Road Project 1.1Scoping Consultative Meeting Minutes

MEETING:KPAIN TOWN VENUE: KPAIN TOWN HALL

DATE: Aug 4,2013 TIME:12:00 mid-Day

Issue/s Raised Participant concerned Response Are you prepared to tell Rancy p Goaney Seymour Dweh(Earth Environmental us at this moment the No, if i should tell you now, it is going to be very value of our structures unfair or disadvantageous to you and other people. and crops? The valves of people structures and crops will be shown upon our return.

The 75feet Ragger Sekwai Seymour N. Dweh (Earth Environmental measurement along the Consultancy) road enter my oil palm Because no one is allow to buy land around the farm where no one is area you mention clearly speak that you do not own allow to purchase land the land, at that you will only be pay for your oil so what do I benefit? palm that might be damage. The survey is Alfred K. Sumo Seymour N. Dweh( Earth Environmental measuring 150ft in rural Consultancy) areas, is that the end of That is the measurement put forth by the the road or should we Government through the ministry of public’s work, expect an addition in the should that change in the future it’s left with the future? Government to decide.

I do have a squatter Prince Wonyenneh No, the squatter right does not gave you that right, does that qualified opportunity only the legitimate land owner who has me to benefit from the a title deed to substantiate his or her claims. land compensation? Regarding this survey Anderson Suo According to the environmental, social and impact will there be demolition assessment law of Liberia, states that there should before resettlement or be proper resettlement before any project after resettlement? commencement. So you will be resettled before the demolition period. Why have you decide to It’s not the decision of my company, but the measured 50ft in Ganta Government, that all urban areas should be city while 75ft along the measured 50ft while rural areas 75ft. road out of the city? -We also want to make Earth Environmental Consultancy, will convey this a request to the to the ministry of Public work via our report. Government to please upgrade the Kpain Town road, because this is where the road used to pass before. Some structures are Saye Flomo The only reason is that we are not marking all mark while others are structures along the road but the ones that are not yet they are both found within the 50ft in the urban or 75ft in the rural along the road, could areas. you please state why?

What if my land that I do J. Allison Payeson Provided you are able to present your deed to have a title deed for is substantiate your clam yes, you will be found within these compensated for your land appropriately. measurement, and there is no farm on it do I stand to benefit anything? Considering natural J Otosco Nyanmah Admittedly there will be time for verification so you phenomenon, should will have to maintain your structures till that time, my structure fall before other than that your faith might be question for a the demolition, will I still benefit. be a beneficiary? When the resettlement Abraham Sonnie You will be paid at your various Towns or Villages, issue get started, are but you will always gather here for meeting till the we going to be paid our entire exercise comes to an end. benefit at our various We will be using your Towns and villages for the Towns and Villages or payment so as to know whether you are the are we going to legitimate owner of the property you claim to have. transport ourselves to Kpain for the payment exercise as well?

All of the questions of the attendances were answered. And the meeting ended at 2:45 p.m.

PICTORIAL OF MEETING