Waiting for Democracy: the Politics of Choice in Natural Resource

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Waiting for Democracy: the Politics of Choice in Natural Resource WRI REPORT World Resources Institute WRI REPORT WAITING FOR DEMOCRACY WAITING JESSE C. RIBOT The Politics of Choice in Natural Resource Decentralization World Resources Institute 10 G Street, NE Suite 800 Washington, DC 20002 www.wri.org WAITING FOR DEMOCRACY The Politics of Choice in Natural Resource Decentralization WAITING FOR DEMOCRACY THE POLITICS OF CHOICE IN NATURAL RESOURCE DECENTRALIZATION JESSE C. RIBOT World Resources Institute WASHINGTON, DC MARTHA SCHULTZ AND EMILY YAGHMOUR EDITORS HYACINTH BILLINGS PUBLICATIONS DIRECTOR MAGGIE POWELL LAYOUT MOR GUEYE COVER ART Each World Resources Institute report represents a timely, scholarly treatment solicits and responds to the guidance of advisory panels and expert reviewers. of a subject of public concern. WRI takes responsibility for choosing the study Unless otherwise stated, however, all the interpretation and findings set forth topics and guaranteeing its authors and researchers freedom of inquiry. It also in WRI publications are those of the authors. Copyright © 2004 World Resources Institute. All rights reserved. The cover image was designed by the author and painted by the Senegalese reverse glass-painting artist Mor Gueye. As a government officer organizes a ISBN 1-56973-564-6 “participatory” meeting, a child is conjugating on the wall “I participate, you Printed in the United States of America. Text stock has a recycled content of participate, he/she participates, we participate, you (plural) participate, they 30%; cover stock has a recycled content of 10%. profit.” This graffiti was first brought to my attention by Lisa Peattie (personal communication April 2004), who saw this writing on a wall in Paris in 1968. The graffiti was written following President Charles De Gaulle’s May 1968 speech in which he spoke of the need for more “participation” and proposed a referendum on the topic (Rohan 1988; Atelier Populaire 1969; Gunn and Iain 1998 at www.marxist.com/1968/may68.html). Figure 3 © The New Yorker Collection 2001 Charles Barsotti from cartoonbank.com. All Rights Reserved. WRI: WAITING FOR DEMOCRACY ii CONTENTS Acronyms ...................................................... vii Section 2: Local Accountability— Institutional Choices in Practice ................. 25 Acknowledgments ....................................... viii Elected Local Government ................................... 26 Local Administrative Bodies: Deconcentration .... 30 Executive Summary........................................ 1 Customary Authority ............................................. 31 Main Findings ........................................................ 2 NGOs and Community Groups ........................... 34 Recommendations .................................................. 4 Crosscutting Institutional Issues .......................... 36 Implementation ..................................................... 6 Single-purpose vs. multi-purpose bodies ................. 36 Privileging marginal and poor groups .................... 38 Introduction—Democracy and Elite capture and patronage ................................... 41 Natural Resources ......................................... 7 Role of a strong central state ................................... 43 What Is Decentralization and Why Decentralize? .... 8 Accountability of the central state and Democracy and Natural Resources: Mutual donors to local government .................................. 43 Reinforcement, Sustainability, and Scaling Up . 12 Institutional Choice—Asking the Fettered Reforms .................................................. 14 Right Questions ................................................. 45 Measuring Decentralization: Cases, Methods, Limitations .......................................... 15 Section 3. Responsiveness of Local Organization of the Report ................................... 16 Institutions—Power and Capacity ............. 47 Power Matters ....................................................... 47 Section 1: Theoretical Foundation Power transfers in practice ..................................... 47 of Decentralization’s Potential Privatization is not decentralization ...................... 51 Environmental Benefits ............................... 17 Geographic scale ..................................................... 52 Democratic Decentralization and Interjurisdictional equity ........................................ 52 Representation: A Policy Process ...................... 17 Security: The “means of transfer” problem .............. 53 Accountability and Principles of Institutional Choice .. 18 Setting the boundaries on local power: Powers: Discretion and Subsidiarity ..................... 21 Planning versus standards .................................. 54 Mediating Factors: Decentralization Local control over outside industries ....................... 59 is No Panacea ..................................................... 23 The Capacity Conundrum .................................... 59 Power Choices—Asking the Right Questions ...... 65 WRI: WAITING FOR DEMOCRACY iii Section 4: Lessons Learned ........................ 67 Boxes Accountability and Institutional Choice ...............67 1. Defining Decentralization and Related Terms ............ 9 Interinstitutional accountability, plurality, 2. The Logic behind Decentralization’s Promises ............12 and coexistence—Choose democracy .................. 68 3. Measuring Decentralization’s Outcomes ............ 16 Institutional choice for scaling up 4. Sustained Forest Management in India through and sustaining representation ............................ 70 the Transfer of “Means of Regulation” ....................... 22 Institutional choice and citizenship ...................... 70 5. Trees Saved by Local Elections in Uganda .................. 26 Subsidiarity: Choosing Powers, 6. Elected Councillors in Senegal Give Away Sequencing Transfers ........................................70 Forests against the Will of Local People ...................... 28 Subsidiarity principles ........................................... 70 7. Elected Authorities Lose Legitimacy Sequencing points ................................................... 71 When They Can’t Deliver .......................................... 30 Beyond Actors, Powers, and Accountability: 8. King vs. Council in Uganda— Other Factors Affecting Outcomes .................... 72 Who Better Manages the Forests? ............................. 32 (En)countering Resistance to Democratic 9. Manufacturing Success .............................................37 Decentralization: Seizing Opportunities ........... 74 10. Elite Participation with Committee Proliferation ......... 38 Resistance to the transfer of powers........................ 74 11. Timber Concessions vs. Local Management Institutional choices as a form of resistance............ 75 and Matters of Scale .................................................. 40 Resistance by local actors ....................................... 76 12. The Loss of Local Jurisdiction Countering resistance ............................................ 76 in Uganda’s Masindi District ..................................... 50 13. Overly Complex Management Planning ..................... 55 Section 5: Recommendations ..................... 79 14. Greater Local Equity and Revenues, Fewer Outside Loggers in Bolivia .............................. 58 Establish the Institutional Infrastructure of Democratic Decentralization .........................79 15. Capacity as an Excuse for Retaining Central Power in Nicaragua ...................................... 60 Decentralize the Management of Natural Resources ........................................................... 82 16. Double Standards or Minimum Standards in Senegal ................................................ 63 Counter Resistance and Seize Opportunity .......... 82 17. Perverse Incentives in Uganda .................................. 64 Further Research .................................................. 83 18. Decentralizing Over-exploitation in Indonesia—Get It While It Lasts ............................73 Annex A: WRI Research on 19. Proposed Environmental Subsidiarity Principles ........ 81 Decentralization and the Environment ...... 85 Annex B: Case Study Descriptions ............. 87 Figures Country Case Studies............................................ 87 1. Formal Definitions: Decentralization, Not Decentralization ................................................. 10 Crosscutting Cases .............................................. 107 2. Accountability Defines Effective Decentralization ....... 19 Annex C: Accountability Mechanisms ......109 3. The Silent Majority ................................................... 39 4. Accountability Relations Mediated Works Cited ................................................. 115 by Local Government ............................................... 69 Endnotes ...................................................... 133 WRI: WAITING FOR DEMOCRACY iv This report is dedicated to the memory of Dr. Nyangabyaki Bazaara, who directed the Centre for Basic Research in Kampala, Uganda. Dr. Bazaara was an intellectual pillar of WRI’s decentralization research program. Reading this report you will see reflections of his insights and spirit throughout. He died in Kampala in August 2003 at the age of 42. WRI: WAITING FOR DEMOCRACY v WRI: WAITING FOR DEMOCRACY vi ACRONYMS CBNRM Community-based natural resource NRM Natural resource management management NWP Nature, Wealth, and Power
Recommended publications
  • Dahl and Charles E
    PLEASE READ BEFORE PRINTING! PRINTING AND VIEWING ELECTRONIC RESERVES Printing tips: ▪ To reduce printing errors, check the “Print as Image” box, under the “Advanced” printing options. ▪ To print, select the “printer” button on the Acrobat Reader toolbar. DO NOT print using “File>Print…” in the browser menu. ▪ If an article has multiple parts, print out only one part at a time. ▪ If you experience difficulty printing, come to the Reserve desk at the Main or Science Library. Please provide the location, the course and document being accessed, the time, and a description of the problem or error message. ▪ For patrons off campus, please email or call with the information above: Main Library: [email protected] or 706-542-3256 Science Library: [email protected] or 706-542-4535 Viewing tips: ▪ The image may take a moment to load. Please scroll down or use the page down arrow keys to begin viewing this document. ▪ Use the “zoom” function to increase the size and legibility of the document on the screen. The “zoom” function is accessed by selecting the “magnifying glass” button on the Acrobat Reader toolbar. NOTICE CONCERNING COPYRIGHT The copyright law of the United States (Title 17, United States Code) governs the making of photocopies or other reproduction of copyrighted material. Section 107, the “Fair Use” clause of this law, states that under certain conditions one may reproduce copyrighted material for criticism, comment, teaching and classroom use, scholarship, or research without violating the copyright of this material. Such use must be non-commercial in nature and must not impact the market for or value of the copyrighted work.
    [Show full text]
  • Literariness.Org-Mareike-Jenner-Auth
    Crime Files Series General Editor: Clive Bloom Since its invention in the nineteenth century, detective fiction has never been more pop- ular. In novels, short stories, films, radio, television and now in computer games, private detectives and psychopaths, prim poisoners and overworked cops, tommy gun gangsters and cocaine criminals are the very stuff of modern imagination, and their creators one mainstay of popular consciousness. Crime Files is a ground-breaking series offering scholars, students and discerning readers a comprehensive set of guides to the world of crime and detective fiction. Every aspect of crime writing, detective fiction, gangster movie, true-crime exposé, police procedural and post-colonial investigation is explored through clear and informative texts offering comprehensive coverage and theoretical sophistication. Titles include: Maurizio Ascari A COUNTER-HISTORY OF CRIME FICTION Supernatural, Gothic, Sensational Pamela Bedore DIME NOVELS AND THE ROOTS OF AMERICAN DETECTIVE FICTION Hans Bertens and Theo D’haen CONTEMPORARY AMERICAN CRIME FICTION Anita Biressi CRIME, FEAR AND THE LAW IN TRUE CRIME STORIES Clare Clarke LATE VICTORIAN CRIME FICTION IN THE SHADOWS OF SHERLOCK Paul Cobley THE AMERICAN THRILLER Generic Innovation and Social Change in the 1970s Michael Cook NARRATIVES OF ENCLOSURE IN DETECTIVE FICTION The Locked Room Mystery Michael Cook DETECTIVE FICTION AND THE GHOST STORY The Haunted Text Barry Forshaw DEATH IN A COLD CLIMATE A Guide to Scandinavian Crime Fiction Barry Forshaw BRITISH CRIME FILM Subverting
    [Show full text]
  • The Cultural Politics of Proxy-Voting in Nagaland
    TIF - The Cultural Politics of Proxy-Voting in Nagaland JELLE J P WOUTERS June 7, 2019 RODERICK WIJUNAMAI Voters in Kohima, Nagaland | PIB Photo Nagaland’s voter turnouts are often the highest in the country, and it may be so this time around as well. But why was the citizenry of Nagaland so keen to vote for their lone, largely ineffectual representative in the Lok Sabha? Of all truisms about democracy, one that is held to be particularly true is that any democracy’s vitality and verve depends on its voter turnouts during elections. As the acclaimed political and social theorist Steven Lukes (1975: 304) concluded long ago: “Participation in elections can plausibly be interpreted as the symbolic affirmation of the voters’ acceptance of the political system and of their role within it.” Indian democracy thence draws special attention; not just for its trope of being the world’s largest democracy (Indian voters make up roughly one-sixth of the world’s electorate) but for the democratic and electoral effervescence reported all across the country. While a disenchantment with democratic institutions and politics is now clearly discernible in large swathes of the so-called “West” and finds its reflection in declining voter turnouts, to the point almost where a minority of citizens elect majority governments, India experiences no such democratic fatigue. Here voter turnouts are not just consistently high, but continue to increase and now habitually outdo those of much older democracies elsewhere. And if India’s official voter turnouts are already high, they might well be a low estimate still.
    [Show full text]
  • Types of Democracy the Democratic Form of Government Is An
    Types of Democracy The democratic form of government is an institutional configuration that allows for popular participation through the electoral process. According to political scientist Robert Dahl, the democratic ideal is based on two principles: political participation and political contestation. Political participation requires that all the people who are eligible to vote can vote. Elections must be free, fair, and competitive. Once the votes have been cast and the winner announced, power must be peacefully transferred from one individual to another. These criteria are to be replicated on a local, state, and national level. A more robust conceptualization of democracy emphasizes what Dahl refers to as political contestation. Contestation refers to the ability of people to express their discontent through freedom of the speech and press. People should have the ability to meet and discuss their views on political issues without fear of persecution from the state. Democratic regimes that guarantee both electoral freedoms and civil rights are referred to as liberal democracies. In the subfield of Comparative Politics, there is a rich body of literature dealing specifically with the intricacies of the democratic form of government. These scholarly works draw distinctions between democratic regimes based on representative government, the institutional balance of power, and the electoral procedure. There are many shades of democracy, each of which has its own benefits and disadvantages. Types of Democracy The broadest differentiation that scholars make between democracies is based on the nature of representative government. There are two categories: direct democracy and representative democracy. We can identify examples of both in the world today.
    [Show full text]
  • Deliberative Ecological Economics for Sustainability Governance
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Diposit Digital de Documents de la UAB Sustainability 2010, 2, 3399-3417; doi:10.3390/su2113399 OPEN ACCESS sustainability ISSN 2071-1050 www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability Article Deliberative Ecological Economics for Sustainability Governance Christos Zografos 1,* and Richard B. Howarth 2 1 Institut de Ciència i Tecnologia Ambientals (ICTA), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, ETSE QC/3107, 08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain 2 Environmental Studies Program, Dartmouth College, HB 6182, 113 Steele Hall, Hanover, NH 03755, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +34-93-586-8260; Fax: +34-93-581-3331. Received: 29 June 2010; in revised form: 26 October 2010 / Accepted: 27 October 2010 / Published: 29 October 2010 Abstract: We discuss the recent emergence of ‗deliberative ecological economics‘, a field that highlights the potential of deliberation for improving environmental governance. We locate the emergence of this literature in the long concern in ecological economics over the policy implications of limited views of human action and its encounter with deliberative democracy scholarship and the model of communicative rationality as an alternative to utilitarianism. Considering criticisms over methods used and the focus of research in deliberative decision-making, we put forward a research agenda for deliberative ecological economics. Given the promising potential of deliberative processes for improving the effectiveness and legitimacy of environmental decision-making, work in this area could help advance both theory and practice in environmental governance. Keywords: sustainability governance; preference formation; deliberative democracy; environmental decision-making; ecological economics 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historian-Filmmaker's Dilemma: Historical Documentaries in Sweden in the Era of Häger and Villius
    ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS Studia Historica Upsaliensia 210 Utgivna av Historiska institutionen vid Uppsala universitet genom Torkel Jansson, Jan Lindegren och Maria Ågren 1 2 David Ludvigsson The Historian-Filmmaker’s Dilemma Historical Documentaries in Sweden in the Era of Häger and Villius 3 Dissertation in History for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy presented at Uppsala University in 2003 ABSTRACT Ludvigsson, David, 2003: The Historian-Filmmaker’s Dilemma. Historical Documentaries in Sweden in the Era of Häger and Villius. Written in English. Acta Universitatis Upsalien- sis. Studia Historica Upsaliensia 210. (411 pages). Uppsala 2003. ISSN 0081-6531. ISBN 91-554-5782-7. This dissertation investigates how history is used in historical documentary films, and ar- gues that the maker of such films constantly negotiates between cognitive, moral, and aes- thetic demands. In support of this contention a number of historical documentaries by Swedish historian-filmmakers Olle Häger and Hans Villius are discussed. Other historical documentaries supply additional examples. The analyses take into account both the produc- tion process and the representations themselves. The history culture and the social field of history production together form the conceptual framework for the study, and one of the aims is to analyse the role of professional historians in public life. The analyses show that different considerations compete and work together in the case of all documentaries, and figure at all stages of pre-production, production, and post-produc- tion. But different considerations have particular inuence at different stages in the produc- tion process and thus they are more or less important depending on where in the process the producer puts his emphasis on them.
    [Show full text]
  • WHY COMPETITION in the POLITICS INDUSTRY IS FAILING AMERICA a Strategy for Reinvigorating Our Democracy
    SEPTEMBER 2017 WHY COMPETITION IN THE POLITICS INDUSTRY IS FAILING AMERICA A strategy for reinvigorating our democracy Katherine M. Gehl and Michael E. Porter ABOUT THE AUTHORS Katherine M. Gehl, a business leader and former CEO with experience in government, began, in the last decade, to participate actively in politics—first in traditional partisan politics. As she deepened her understanding of how politics actually worked—and didn’t work—for the public interest, she realized that even the best candidates and elected officials were severely limited by a dysfunctional system, and that the political system was the single greatest challenge facing our country. She turned her focus to political system reform and innovation and has made this her mission. Michael E. Porter, an expert on competition and strategy in industries and nations, encountered politics in trying to advise governments and advocate sensible and proven reforms. As co-chair of the multiyear, non-partisan U.S. Competitiveness Project at Harvard Business School over the past five years, it became clear to him that the political system was actually the major constraint in America’s inability to restore economic prosperity and address many of the other problems our nation faces. Working with Katherine to understand the root causes of the failure of political competition, and what to do about it, has become an obsession. DISCLOSURE This work was funded by Harvard Business School, including the Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness and the Division of Research and Faculty Development. No external funding was received. Katherine and Michael are both involved in supporting the work they advocate in this report.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mass Media, Democracy and the Public Sphere
    Sonia Livingstone and Peter Lunt The mass media, democracy and the public sphere Book section Original citation: Originally published in Livingstone, Sonia and Lunt, Peter, (eds.) Talk on television audience participation and public debate. London : Routledge, UK, 1994, pp. 9-35. © 1994 Sonia Livingstone and Peter Lunt This version available at: http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/48964/ Available in LSE Research Online: April 2013 LSE has developed LSE Research Online so that users may access research output of the School. Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Users may download and/or print one copy of any article(s) in LSE Research Online to facilitate their private study or for non-commercial research. You may not engage in further distribution of the material or use it for any profit-making activities or any commercial gain. You may freely distribute the URL (http://eprints.lse.ac.uk) of the LSE Research Online website. This document is the author’s submitted version of the book section. There may be differences between this version and the published version. You are advised to consult the publisher’s version if you wish to cite from it. Original citation: Livingstone, S., and Lunt, P. (1994) The mass media, democracy and the public sphere. In Talk on Television: Audience participation and public debate (9-35). London: Routledge. Chapter 2 The mass media, democracy and the public sphere INTRODUCTION In this chapter we explore the role played by the mass media in political participation, in particular in the relationship between the laity and established power.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Resources, Contending Theoretical Perspectives, and the Problem of Prescription: an Essay
    Volume 30 Issue 2 Public Policy and Natural Resources Spring 1990 Natural Resources, Contending Theoretical Perspectives, and the Problem of Prescription: An Essay John G. Francis Recommended Citation John G. Francis, Natural Resources, Contending Theoretical Perspectives, and the Problem of Prescription: An Essay, 30 Nat. Resources J. 263 (1990). Available at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol30/iss2/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Natural Resources Journal by an authorized editor of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected], [email protected]. JOHN G. FRANCIS* Natural Resources, Contending Theoretical Perspectives, and the Problem of Prescription: An Essay ABSTRACT Natural resource studies have gained increasing scholarly atten- tion, yet these studies have remained outside the mainstream of po- litical science inquiry. This essay explores why it is that natural resources political studies have failed to attain greater prominence, reviews the strong prescriptive tradition characterizing these studies, and offers a critique of the major theoretical constructs used to explain natural resource policy. It is argued that explanation can best be advanced by developing greater interconnections between theory and observation. Today should be the golden age of natural resources political studies. Many of the traditions of inquiry that have characterized natural resources policy analysis during this century are now finding increasing favor in the general field of political inquiry. There has been increased interest in qualitative analysis, along with an increased willingness to assign central importance to the role of values in political inquiry and to rely on the use of narrative in policy analysis.' These strategies of inquiry have long characterized much of the work in natural resources studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 7 Investment in Independent Production
    APPENDIX 7 INVESTMENT IN INDEPENDENT PRODUCTION ABRIDGED Appendix 7 - Expenditures on Programming and Development on Independent Productions in Quebec (Condition of licence 23) CBC English Television 2019-2020 SUMMARY Programming Expenditure* All Independents* Quebec independents Percentage 131,425,935 5,895,791 4.5% Development Expenditures All Independents Quebec independents Percentage #### #### 8.5% Note: * Expenses as shown in Corporation's Annual Reports to the Commission, line 5 (Programs acquired from independent producers), Direct Operation Expenses section. Appendix 7-Summary Page 1 ABRIDGED APPENDIX 7 - CANADIAN INDEPENDENT PRODUCTION EXPENDITURES - DETAILED REPORT CBC English Television 2019-2020 Program Title Expenditures* Producer / Address Producer's Province A Cure For What Hails You - 2013 #### PYRAMID PRODUCTIONS 1 INC 2875 107th Avenue S.E. Calgary Alberta Alberta Digging in the Dirt #### Back Road Productions #102 – 9955 114th Street Edmonton Alberta Alberta Fortunate Son #### 1968 Productions Inc. 2505 17TH AVE SW STE 223 CALGARY Alberta Alberta HEARTLAND S 1-7 #### Rescued Horse Season Inc. 223, 2505 - 17th Avenue SW Calgary Alberta Alberta HEARTLAND S13 #### Rescued Horse Season Inc. 223, 2505 - 17th Avenue SW Calgary Alberta Alberta HEARTLAND X #### Rescued Horse Season Inc. 223, 2505 - 17th Avenue SW Calgary Alberta Alberta HEARTLAND XII #### Rescued Horse Season Inc. 223, 2505 - 17th Avenue SW Calgary Alberta Alberta Lonely #### BRANDY Y PRODUCTIONS INC 10221 Princess Elizabeth Avenue Edmonton, Alberta Alberta Narii - Love and Fatherhood #### Hidden Story Productions Ltd. 347 Sierra Nevada Place SW Calgary Alberta T3H3M9 Alberta The Nature Of Things - A Bee's Diary #### Bee Diary Productions Inc. #27, 2816 - 34 Ave Edmonton Alberta Alberta A Shine of Rainbows #### Smudge Ventures Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Transforming Government Post–COVID-19 How Flipping Orthodoxies Can Reinvent Government Operating Models
    A report from the Deloitte Center for Government Insights Transforming government post–COVID-19 How flipping orthodoxies can reinvent government operating models Part I of a Center for Government Insights series on transforming government post–COVID-19 About the authors William D. Eggers | [email protected] William D. Eggers is the executive director of Deloitte’s Center for Government Insights, where he is responsible for the firm’s public sector thought leadership. His most recent book isDelivering on Digital: The Innovators and Technologies that Are Transforming Government. His other books include The Solution Revolution, the Washington Post bestseller If We Can Put a Man on the Moon, and Governing by Network. He coined the term Government 2.0 in a book by the same name. His commentary has appeared in dozens of major media outlets including the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and Washington Post. Pankaj Kishnani | [email protected] Pankaj Kishnani is a researcher with the Deloitte Center for Government Insights. He specializes in emerging trends in technology and their impact on the public sector. Shruthi Krishnamoorthy | [email protected] Shruthi Krishnamoorthy is a researcher with the Deloitte Center for Government Insights. Her research focuses on emerging trends in government operations and delivery. Contents The old normal won’t work anymore 2 A short introduction to orthodoxies 4 Workforce and workplace 5 Service delivery 12 Pace 17 Beyond normal 20 Endnotes 21 Transforming government post–COVID-19 The old normal won’t work anymore OVERNMENTS AROUND THE world are should be done that often go unstated and beginning to reopen not only their unquestioned.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Common Purpose: Reinventing American Democracy for the 21St Century (Cambridge, Mass.: American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2020)
    OUR COMMON REINVENTING AMERICAN PURPOSEDEMOCRACY FOR THE 21ST CENTURY COMMISSION ON THE PRACTICE OF DEMOCRATIC CITIZENSHIP Thus I consent, Sir, to this Constitution because I expect no better, and because I am not sure that it is not the best. The opinions I have had of its errors, I sacrifice to the public good. I have never whispered a syllable of them abroad. Within these walls they were born, and here they shall die. If every one of us in returning to our Constituents were to report the objections he has had to it, and endeavor to gain partizans in support of them, we might prevent its being generally received, and thereby lose all the salutary effects and great advantages resulting naturally in our favor among foreign Nations as well as among ourselves, from our real or apparent unanimity. —BENJAMIN FRANKLIN FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE COMMISSION ON THE PRACTICE OF DEMOCRATIC CITIZENSHIP OUR COMMON REINVENTING AMERICAN PURPOSEDEMOCRACY FOR THE 21ST CENTURY american academy of arts & sciences Cambridge, Massachusetts © 2020 by the American Academy of Arts & Sciences All rights reserved. ISBN: 0-87724-133-3 This publication is available online at www.amacad.org/ourcommonpurpose. Suggested citation: American Academy of Arts and Sciences, Our Common Purpose: Reinventing American Democracy for the 21st Century (Cambridge, Mass.: American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2020). PHOTO CREDITS iStock.com/ad_krikorian: cover; iStock.com/carterdayne: page 1; Martha Stewart Photography: pages 13, 19, 21, 24, 28, 34, 36, 42, 45, 52,
    [Show full text]