DOCSLIB.ORG

APFI Trade Mission to the American Film Market Mission Purpose

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
APFI Trade Mission to the American Film Market Mission Purpose APFI Trade Mission to the American Film Market Mission Purpose The APFI’s focus for the AFM in 2019 will be on a pitching meeting schedule with individual meetings for each member of a 6 person group of producers drawn from Finland’s leading film production companies. MediaXchange’s priority will be promoting the APFI’s group of producers and maximizing their meeting schedules and opportunities for their film projects. Group Numbers: This proposal, the schedule of work and the fee, have been designed for a minimum of 4 and maximum of 6 fiction, feature film producers/production companies. Schedule Content: Each of the following stages will be key to the proper preparation of the Finnish producers in order to provide an effective schedule. 1. Preparation through Advance Focus Forms and Calls: a) the producers will provide information on their company, current representation, projects and targets to enable MediaXchange to assess their potential meeting needs and interests. A call with each producer will further assist in MediaXchange’s sourcing of meeting contacts and schedule planning. b) Assessment of the producers’ level and needs as well as current US and international representation and profile c) Consultation/advice on preparation of materials and potential pitching angles. 2. On site welcome and schedule briefing session 3. On site Specialist Sessions for the group designed to outline the current state of the US market and to specifically address how to approach and understand the US and international markets for producers selling their projects. Examples of the topics which would be covered are detailed in the attachment Meeting Targets and Session Topics. Once the participating producers have been confirmed, the topics will be updated and revised in line with information obtained from the Focus Forms, the Preparation Calls and in line with the interests and needs of the producers. 4. A debrief meeting with the group or individual producers or the APFI to review the most effective follow up to the meetings. Dates: MediaXchange will design, source, coordinate and deliver a 3-day schedule to run from Wednesday, November 6th through Friday, November 8th.The producers will give precedence to the MediaXchange meetings on these days above any meetings they have arranged for their own schedules. MediaXchange will deliver 6-8 meetings for each participant with the meetings and Specialist Sessions to take place during the 3-day schedule. Meeting Host Targets: Meeting targets will be producers, financiers, studios, streaming services, production companies, agents and casting agents. Some examples of those who will be approached are detailed below, Meeting Targets and Specialist Session Topics. The APFI and MediaXchange will liaise to ensure the overlap of contact, between MediaXchange’s approaches to Meeting hosts and Specialist Session speakers and the APFI’s approaches regarding the APFI’s own schedule in Los Angeles, is minimized and coordinated. Logistics: • The APFI plan is that the producers do not have to register for the AFM. It is noted that the current early bird registration pricing applies through October 11th, 2019 and that access to the AFM’s principal location of the Loews Santa Monica Beach Hotel is restricted to those complying with registration conditions. • Meetings will therefore take place in the hotel/s adjacent to the AFM’s principal location or at the offices of hosts. MediaXchange will ensure the schedule is built around the travel time necessary and it will be the responsibility of the producers to make their own transfer and travel arrangements in order to arrive promptly at each meeting. • A location for the onsite Briefing and Specialist Sessions will be arranged by MediaXchange. • Meetings and logistics during the MediaXchange schedule will be supervised or coordinated, depending on the location, by the MediaXchange team in Los Angeles. SPECIALIST SESSIONS – EXAMPLE TOPICS Current film trends Innovative deal making Localized content with a global approach and appeal The US as major independent filmmaking hub Audiences engaging with emotional filmmaking trends/engaging concepts – just consider Bandersnatch, the fascinating new interactive film by Netflix Ongoing potential for female led or female story centric projects The future of filmmaking, is it really going virtual US Tax Incentives complementing / competing with Local Tax Incentives POTENTIAL FILM MEETING TARGETS (Examples of Los Angeles Based Companies) • Financiers MWM STUDIOS – Distributor. Finance, Production Company ANNAPURNA PICTURES - Distributor, Financier/Finance, Production Company FOCUS FEATURES - Distributor, Financier/Finance, Studio/Production Company NEW REPUBLIC, Finance, Production Company WAYPOINT ENTERTAINMENT, Financier/Finance, Production Company BLACK LABEL MEDIA, Financier/ Production Company PARTICIPANT MEDIA, Distributor, Financier/Finance, Production Company • Distribution GRAVITAS VENTURES – Distributor ROADSIDE ATTRACTIONS, Distributor 101 STUDIOS, Distributor, Studio • Distribution/Production Company A24 - Distributor, Film Sales Agency, Production Company BLUMHOUSE – Production Company ELEVATED, Production Company FOX SEARCHLIGHT - Distributor, Production Company GUNPOWER AND SKY - Distributor, Production Company SAMUEL GOLDWYN - Distributor, Production Company SPYGLASS MEDIA GROUP, Distributor, Studio/Production Company • Sales Agents INTERNATIONAL FILM TRUST FILMNATION, Distributor, Film Sales Agency, Financier/Finance, Production Company MYRIAD PICTURES, Distributor, Film Sales Agency, Financier/Finance SAMUEL GOLDWYN, Distributor, Production Company VOLTAGE PICTURES, Film Sales Agency, Financier/Finance, Production Company • Casting Directors RICH DELIA CASTING • Banks MUFG Union Bank City National Bank East West Bank BANC OF California • Lawyers Lichter Grossman Nichols Adler Feldman & Clark Loeb and Loeb Paul Hastings Law Firm • Agents ICM WME CAA • Streamers NETFLIX AMAZON DISNEY PLUS • Studios WALT DISNEY PARAMOUNT PICTURES SONY LIONSGATE UNIVERSAL PICTURES MGM WARNER BROS COLUMBIA PICTURES .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • GLAAD Media Institute Began to Track LGBTQ Characters Who Have a Disability
    Studio Responsibility IndexDeadline 2021 STUDIO RESPONSIBILITY INDEX 2021 From the desk of the President & CEO, Sarah Kate Ellis In 2013, GLAAD created the Studio Responsibility Index theatrical release windows and studios are testing different (SRI) to track lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and release models and patterns. queer (LGBTQ) inclusion in major studio films and to drive We know for sure the immense power of the theatrical acceptance and meaningful LGBTQ inclusion. To date, experience. Data proves that audiences crave the return we’ve seen and felt the great impact our TV research has to theaters for that communal experience after more than had and its continued impact, driving creators and industry a year of isolation. Nielsen reports that 63 percent of executives to do more and better. After several years of Americans say they are “very or somewhat” eager to go issuing this study, progress presented itself with the release to a movie theater as soon as possible within three months of outstanding movies like Love, Simon, Blockers, and of COVID restrictions being lifted. May polling from movie Rocketman hitting big screens in recent years, and we remain ticket company Fandango found that 96% of 4,000 users hopeful with the announcements of upcoming queer-inclusive surveyed plan to see “multiple movies” in theaters this movies originally set for theatrical distribution in 2020 and summer with 87% listing “going to the movies” as the top beyond. But no one could have predicted the impact of the slot in their summer plans. And, an April poll from Morning COVID-19 global pandemic, and the ways it would uniquely Consult/The Hollywood Reporter found that over 50 percent disrupt and halt the theatrical distribution business these past of respondents would likely purchase a film ticket within a sixteen months.
    [Show full text]
  • Runaway Production Problem? the Phenomenon of “Runaway” Film and Television Production from the U.S
    U.S. RUNAWAY FILM AND TELEVISION PRODUCTION STUDY REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Executive Summary Page 2 II. The U.S. Runaway Film and Television Production Problem – A. Runaway Activity/Trends Page 6 – B. Total Economic Impact Page 11 – C. U.S. Regional Impact Page 15 – D. Direct Labor Impact Page 16 – E. Future Impact Page 17 III. The Causes – A. Production Location Decision Drivers Page 18 – B. Exchange Rates and Factor Costs Page 19 – C. Foreign Tax Incentives Page 20 – D. Total Cost Differences Page 23 – E. Foreign Infrastructure Page 23 – F. The Integrated Approach and Canada Page 24 IV. Study Methodology and Key Terms Page 27 V. About Monitor Company Page 29 1 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY “economic” runaways. Note that the study’s scope included theatrical films, films for television, Background television mini-series, and thirty and sixty minute television series. Other types of productions such as In January 1999, the Directors Guild of America commercials, and news and sports programming (DGA) and Screen Actors Guild (SAG) retained were not included. Monitor Company, a leading management consulting firm, to conduct an investigation into What Is The U.S. Runaway Production Problem? the phenomenon of “runaway” film and television production from the U.S. The Guilds (on an The study results show that economic runaway film anecdotal basis) had been noting an accelerating and television productions are a persistent, growing, runaway phenomenon, and the need to create an and very significant issue for the U.S. In 1998, of objective quantitative analysis led to the study being the 1,075 U.S.-developed film and television commissioned.
    [Show full text]
  • After Disney-Fox, Who's Next?
    cc Wednesday, December 20, 2017 latimes.com/news After Disney-Fox, who’s next? Huge deal may force smaller media firms to grow or struggle By MEG JAMES AND RYAN FAUGHNDER TIMES STAFF WRITERS alt Disney Co.'s block- buster deal to buy W much of 21st Century Fox revealed Rupert Murdoch's fear that his media company was not strong enough to survive the digital onslaught — raising questions about how even smaller media com- panies will weather the storm. Since Disney clinched its $52.4- billion deal last week to buy some of Murdoch's most lucrative assets, many wonder which media compa- The entrance of the Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer offices in Santa Monica offices. nies might be next. MGM is among smaller media companies that are considered prime targets for The scramble to bulk up is likely acquisition. (Nick Ut / Associated Press) to force medium-sized players to strike their own deals out of con- nies to sell," predicted Ken Klein- "This is clearly an arms race and cern that they need to grow or get berg, a veteran Los Angeles enter- these companies need to step up left behind as tech giants like Net- tainment business lawyer. "If com- their game," said Lloyd Greif, a Los flix gain more power in Hollywood. panies like Fox are worried, what Angeles investment banker. "We are Sony Pictures Entertainment, are they waiting for?" going to see more creative, accretive CBS Corp., Viacom Inc., Liberty The Disney-Fox deal is just the strategic acquisitions — and acqui- Media Corp., Lionsgate and Metro- latest combination.
    [Show full text]
  • Glenn-Garland-Editor-Credits.Pdf
    GLENN GARLAND, ACE Editor Television PROJECT DIRECTOR STUDIO / PRODUCTION CO. WELCOME TO THE BLUMHOUSE: BLACK BOX Emmanuel Osei-Kuffour Amazon / Blumhouse Productions EP: Jay Ellis, Jason Blum, Aaron Bergman PARADISE CITY*** (series) Ash Avildsen Sumerian Films EP: Lorenzo Antonucci PREACHER (season 3) Various AMC / Sony Pictures Television EP: Sam Catlin, Seth Rogen, Evan Goldberg ALTERED CARBON** (series) Various Netflix / Skydance EP: Laeta Kalogridis, James Middleton, Steve Blackman STAN AGAINST EVIL (series) Various IFC / Radical Media EP: Dana Gould, Frank Scherma, Tom Lassally BANSHEE (series) Ole Christian Madsen HBO / Cinemax Magnus Martens EP: Alan Ball THE VAMPIRE DIARIES (series) Various CW / Warner Bros. Television EP: Julie Plec, Kevin Williamson Feature Films PROJECT DIRECTOR STUDIO / PRODUCTION CO. BROKE Carlyle Eubank Wild West Entertainment Prod: Wyatt Russell, Alex Hertzberg, Peter Billingsley THE TURNING Floria Sigismondi Amblin Partners 3 FROM HELL Rob Zombie Lionsgate FAMILY Laura Steinel Sony Pictures / Annapurna Pictures Official Selection: SXSW Film Festival Prod: Kit Giordano, Sue Naegle, Jeremy Garelick SILENCIO Lorena Villarreal 5100 Films / Prod: Beau Genot 31 Rob Zombie Lionsgate / Saban Films Official Selection: Sundance Film Festival Prod: Mike Elliot, Andy Gould THE QUIET ONES John Pogue Lionsgate / Exclusive Media LORDS OF SALEM Rob Zombie Blumhouse / Anchor Bay Entertainment LOVE & HONOR Danny Mooney IFC Films / Red 56 HALLOWEEN 2 Rob Zombie Dimension Films BUNRAKU* Guy Moshe Snoot Entertainment Official
    [Show full text]
  • Becoming Legendary: Slate Financing and Hollywood Studio Partnership in Contemporary Filmmaking
    Kimberly Owczarski Becoming Legendary: Slate Financing and Hollywood Studio Partnership in Contemporary Filmmaking In June 2005, Warner Bros. Pictures announced Are Marshall (2006), and Trick ‘r’ Treat (2006)2— a multi-film co-financing and co-production not a single one grossed more than $75 million agreement with Legendary Pictures, a new total worldwide at the box office. In 2007, though, company backed by $500 million in private 300 was a surprise hit at the box office and secured equity funding from corporate investors including Legendary’s footing in Hollywood (see Table 1 divisions of Bank of America and AIG.1 Slate for a breakdown of Legendary’s performance at financing, which involves an investment in a the box office). Since then, Legendary has been a specified number of studio films ranging from a partner on several high-profile Warner Bros. films mere handful to dozens of pictures, was hardly a including The Dark Knight, Inception, Watchmen, new phenomenon in Hollywood as several studios Clash of the Titans, and The Hangoverand its sequel. had these types of deals in place by 2005. But In an interview with the Wall Street Journal, the sheer size of the Legendary deal—twenty five Legendary founder Thomas Tull likened his films—was certainly ambitious for a nascent firm. company’s involvement in film production to The first film released as part of this deal wasBatman an entrepreneurial endeavor, stating: “We treat Begins (2005), a rebooting of Warner Bros.’ film each film like a start-up.”3 Tull’s equation of franchise. Although Batman Begins had a strong filmmaking with Wall Street investment is performance at the box office ($205 million in particularly apt, as each film poses the potential domestic theaters and $167 million in international for a great windfall or loss just as investing in a theaters), it was not until two years later that the new business enterprise does for stockholders.
    [Show full text]
  • Hollywood Foreign Press Association 2019 Golden Globe Awards for the Year Ended December 31, 2018 Press Release
    HOLLYWOOD FOREIGN PRESS ASSOCIATION 2019 GOLDEN GLOBE AWARDS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 PRESS RELEASE 1. BEST MOTION PICTURE – DRAMA a. BLACK PANTHER Marvel Studios; Walt Disney Studios Motion Pictures b. BLACKKKLANSMAN QC Entertainment / Blumhouse / Monkeypaw / 40 Acres and a Mule; Focus Features c. BOHEMIAN RHAPSODY Twentieth Century Fox and Regency Enterprises; Twentieth Century Fox d. IF BEALE STREET COULD TALK Annapurna Pictures / Plan B Entertainment / We Pastel; Annapurna Pictures e. A STAR IS BORN Warner Bros. Pictures / Live Nation Productions / Metro Goldwyn Mayer Pictures / Jon Peters Production / Bill Gerber Production / Joint Effort Production; Warner Bros. Pictures 2. BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTRESS IN A MOTION PICTURE – DRAMA a. GLENN CLOSE THE WIFE b. LADY GAGA A STAR IS BORN c. NICOLE KIDMAN DESTROYER d. MELISSA MCCARTHY CAN YOU EVER FORGIVE ME? e. ROSAMUND PIKE A PRIVATE WAR This document is being provided to the media pertaining to the nominations announcements for the 76th Annual Golden Globe Awards. The official press release is presented in PDF format and contains the official results. As a courtesy to the media, this version of the press release in Microsoft Word format is provided for ease of use. Ernst & Young LLP takes no responsibility for errors or changes made by the users of the Word file or the resulting impacts on their reporting. The official press release in PDF format represents the only official results. HOLLYWOOD FOREIGN PRESS ASSOCIATION 2019 GOLDEN GLOBE AWARDS FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 PRESS RELEASE 3. BEST PERFORMANCE BY AN ACTOR IN A MOTION PICTURE – DRAMA a.
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Source Book Owner-Trainer-Jockey Biographies Stakes Winning Jockeys & Trainers Biographical Sketches 2021
    2021 SOURCE BOOK OWNER-TRAINER-JOCKEY BIOGRAPHIES STAKES WINNING JOCKEYS & TRAINERS BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCHES 2021 Hit the Road and jockey Umberto Rispoli have their photo taken in the “winner’s circle” following their victory in the 2020 Opening Day Runhappy Oceanside Stakes. Del Mar conducted racing despite the world-wide pandemic, but it did so without fans and also minus a winner’s circle in line with social distance guidelines. Owners ...................................3 Trainers .................................28 Jockeys ..................................61 u Del Mar thanks Equibase for their statistical aid in compiling this publication. Owners’ Del Mar statistics are for that owner, or owner group, only. No partnerships are considered, except where specifically noted. On the cover: The strange scenario of a land full of masks played out throughout the year at Del Mar and our photographers – Benoit and Associates – captured the community of horsemen going along with the program, one by one. Photos by Benoit & Associates Owner Profiles • Del Mar 2021 Del Mar Thoroughbred Club Owner Proles — 2021 O W trust, turned his dealership over to his son and daughter Nick Alexander N and headed north to the Central California wine and E Born: September 13, 1942 horse country of the Santa Ynez Valley. R Santa Monica, California • There he purchased his 280-acre ranch – Horse Haven S Reside: Santa Ynez and Del Mar, – in the town of Santa Ynez and went all in as a rancher California specializing in racehorses. These days he notes that the ranch is home to approximately 100 horses, including Silks: White, blue yoke, orange 30 broodmares, 25 to 30 racehorses and dozens of and white “MM” on juveniles, yearlings and foals/weanlings.
    [Show full text]
  • Gary Barber Born: in 1957 in Johannesburg, South Africa Residence: Los Angeles, California Family: Three Daughters Education: Earned a B.S
    Gary Barber Born: In 1957 in Johannesburg, South Africa Residence: Los Angeles, California Family: Three daughters Education: Earned a B.S. in accounting at Witwatersand University in South Africa while on a soccer scholarship. Business: He was the chairman and CEO of MGM Studios in Hollywood for eight years until March 2018. • Worked as a chartered accountant in South Africa and as a certified public accountant in the United States before moving into the film industry. He came to the United States in 1982, following his brother, Cecil, who came in 1979. • Co-founder, along with Roger Birnbaum, and CEO of Spyglass Entertainment, which has produced such motion pictures as “Seabiscuit,” “Memoirs of a Geisha,” “The Insider,” and “The Sixth Sense.” The original Spyglass shuttered when its co-founders went to work at MGM in 2010. He has been the executive producer of more than 50 movies. Together with Lantern Entertainment, he relaunched Spyglass Media Group in early 2019 as a content distribution company. • Has been a major player in Southern California over the years, racking up impressive victories with The Deputy, winner of 2000 Santa Anita Derby (G1), as a partner with Team Valor; Gitano Hernando, Red Arrow, Reine de Romance and $50,000 claim, Cost of Freedom, who was a graded stakes winner on his way to becoming a third-place finisher in the 2009 Sprint. • His stable has an international flavor as well as being prominent in North America, scoring big wins in France, Ireland, Australia and his homeland, South Africa. He has owned a number of horses in partnership with Team Valor International, Eclipse Thoroughbred Partners, Altamira Racing, Kevin Tsujihara and trainer Jerry Hollendorfer.
    [Show full text]
  • Lionsgate Reports Results for First Quarter Fiscal 2022
    LIONSGATE REPORTS RESULTS FOR FIRST QUARTER FISCAL 2022 First Quarter Revenue was $901.2 Million; Operating Income was $20.3 Million; Net Loss Attributable to Lionsgate Shareholders was $45.4 Million or $0.20 Diluted Net Loss per Share Adjusted OIBDA was $119.8 Million Global Media Networks Subscribers were 28.9 Million Global Streaming Subscribers were 16.7 Million, reflecting 58% Year-Over-Year Growth; STARZPLAY International Subscribers More than Doubled Year-Over-Year to 7.0 Million Film & Television Library Revenue was $740 Million for Trailing 12 Months SANTA MONICA, CA, and VANCOUVER, BC, August 5, 2021 – Lionsgate (NYSE: LGF.A, LGF.B) today reported first quarter (quarter ended June 30, 2021) revenue of $901.2 million, operating income of $20.3 million and net loss attributable to Lionsgate shareholders of $45.4 million or $0.20 diluted net loss per share on 221.8 million diluted weighted average common shares outstanding. Adjusted net income attributable to Lionsgate shareholders in the quarter was $42.4 million or adjusted diluted EPS of $0.18 on 229.2 million diluted weighted average common shares outstanding, with adjusted OIBDA of $119.8 million. “I’m pleased to report that we were able to lean into our resilient business model to drive strong financial results in the quarter,” said Lionsgate CEO Jon Feltheimer. “We filled our content pipelines with exciting new properties and added valuable new titles to our library. Like the rest of the industry, Starz subscriber growth was impacted by the decline in at home viewership and, importantly, a light content quarter due to COVID-driven production delays.
    [Show full text]
  • How Are the Major Streaming Services Reshaping the Film Industry
    How Are the Major Streaming Services Reshaping the Film Industry Master Thesis MSc Strategy, Organization and Leadership Submission: May 9th, 2018 Normal pages: 106 (237.228 characters incl. spaces) Supervisor: Mehran Moghaddas (DVIP, INT) Students: Viktoria Vas & Gerda Binkyte Copenhagen Business School 2018 Abstract The paper examines the effects major streaming services, such as Netflix, Amazon, HBO have on the Danish film industry, and seeks to identify how individual producers and independent production companies in the country can exploit the rising opportunities. The research used a mix of deductive and inductive reasoning in the analysis, for which twelve semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with industry professionals from Denmark over the course of five weeks. This led to insightful findings that can be used for further researches for both academics and professionals. The analysis built on theories discussed in the literature review; Porter’s five forces (Porter, 1979), supply chain, emerging strategy (Mintzberg, 1987), marketing mix, four trajectories of change (McGahan, 2004). The findings include changes in certain links in the supply chain of film production, such as; affects on producers and film financing, changes in sales and distribution. While for producers SVOD services mainly bring additional financing opportunities, decreasing the power of DFI and the national broadcasters, sales agents and distribution is highly affected. Sales agents will need to adapt to the changing conditions, and transform themselves from traditional sales agents to agents who offer extra services for their clients. Distribution is affected in a way that its release windows system is disrupted and shortening some of these windows might not be avoided in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Netflix and the Development of the Internet Television Network
    Syracuse University SURFACE Dissertations - ALL SURFACE May 2016 Netflix and the Development of the Internet Television Network Laura Osur Syracuse University Follow this and additional works at: https://surface.syr.edu/etd Part of the Social and Behavioral Sciences Commons Recommended Citation Osur, Laura, "Netflix and the Development of the Internet Television Network" (2016). Dissertations - ALL. 448. https://surface.syr.edu/etd/448 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the SURFACE at SURFACE. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations - ALL by an authorized administrator of SURFACE. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abstract When Netflix launched in April 1998, Internet video was in its infancy. Eighteen years later, Netflix has developed into the first truly global Internet TV network. Many books have been written about the five broadcast networks – NBC, CBS, ABC, Fox, and the CW – and many about the major cable networks – HBO, CNN, MTV, Nickelodeon, just to name a few – and this is the fitting time to undertake a detailed analysis of how Netflix, as the preeminent Internet TV networks, has come to be. This book, then, combines historical, industrial, and textual analysis to investigate, contextualize, and historicize Netflix's development as an Internet TV network. The book is split into four chapters. The first explores the ways in which Netflix's development during its early years a DVD-by-mail company – 1998-2007, a period I am calling "Netflix as Rental Company" – lay the foundations for the company's future iterations and successes. During this period, Netflix adapted DVD distribution to the Internet, revolutionizing the way viewers receive, watch, and choose content, and built a brand reputation on consumer-centric innovation.
    [Show full text]
  • A Social Network Analysis of Coproduction Relationships in High Grossing Versus Highly Lauded Films in the U.S
    International Journal of Communication 5 (2011), 1014–1033 1932–8036/20111014 Producing Quality: A Social Network Analysis of Coproduction Relationships in High Grossing Versus Highly Lauded Films in the U.S. Market JADE L. MILLER Tulane University While mainstream U.S. film production has been derided as following a “lowest common denominator” blockbuster-style logic, the industry has actually produced both popular and highly regarded productions. To imagine an alternative (lower cost, higher quality) Hollywood of the future, this article set out to examine the network structure of coproductions in both high grossing and in highly lauded films in the U.S. market for a recent five-year period. Using social network analysis, this study shows that the funding structures of both types of films were less centralized, dense, and clustered than is commonly believed. Coproduction networks of highly lauded films, however, did exhibit structural differences from their high grossing counterparts that suggest more collaboration and penetrability. If the future of film production looks like the structures of the alternative Hollywood described here, we may see a more cooperative, dispersed, and international industrial structure for the future. If one looks at the funding structure of most films released in American theaters, a pattern of familiar names quickly emerges: Paramount, Universal, MGM, and those of other major movie studios. It’s no secret that the majority of films that achieve mass domestic (and international) promotion and distribution are usually associated with a small elite: an oligarchy of production and distribution, headed by a small group of risk-adverse and notoriously nervous executives.
    [Show full text]