DOCSLIB.ORG

§¨¦80 §¨¦15 §¨¦8 §¨¦80 §¨¦10 §¨¦5 §¨¦15

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
§¨¦80 §¨¦15 §¨¦8 §¨¦80 §¨¦10 §¨¦5 §¨¦15 Red Buttes Rogue River Lower Klamath 199 Lake Goose 101 ¤£ ¤£ Klamath Lake )" Crescent City Siskiyou Yreka )" Klamath 97 ¨¦§5 ¤£ Modoc Klamath Celebrating 40 Years )"Alturas Mt. Shasta Modoc Lassen Shasta-Trinity Trinity «¬299 of Protecting Alps Lassen Lava «¬299 )" Eureka Six 395 Rivers Weaverville ¤£ )" TWIN PEAKS «¬3 Lassen )"Redding Five California's Wild Heritage! Springs Lassen 101 National ¤£ Park Skedaddle Skedaddle Honey King Range Lake Red Bluff)" 36 Yolla «¬ Bolly-Middle Eel Ishi 5 § Bucks Plumas ¨¦ 99 «¬ Lake Mendocino Yuki Yuki Berryessa Snow Mountain National Monument Snow Mountain Tahoe )" Ukiah Granite )"Yuba City Chief Lake Clear Tahoe Lake Cache Creek )"Auburn Eldorado ¨¦§80 Placerville )" ¤£50 113 )" 505 «¬ Sacramento Santa ¨¦§ Rosa )" Carson-Iceberg ¤£101 Humboldt-Toiyabe Fairfield )" )" Bodie Bridgeport Bodie Stanislaus Hoover Mountain 12 160 «¬ ¨¦§780 «¬ Mono 4 San Rafael )" «¬ Stockton Lake )" Yosemite 24 «¬ 395 99 ¤£ 80 «¬ 108 Yosemite )"Oakland «¬ )" ¨¦§ «¬120 National San Francisco ¨¦§680 205 Park ¨¦§ «¬140 238 ¤£6 ¨¦§ 580 Modesto White ¨¦§380 ¨¦§ )" «¬92 ¨¦§880 Mountains 84 )" «¬ Redwood «¬262 Inyo City 280 ¬237 ¨¦§ « San Jose )" Sierra Piper Merced )" John Mountain «¬17 Kaiser Muir «¬85 Inyo «¬41 Dinkey Lakes 152 «¬ Kings Madera Canyon/Sequoia )" National Park Inyo Mountains Monarch Death Valley )" Independence National Sequoia 5 )" Inyo Park ¨¦§ Fresno Sequoia-Kings Salinas Mountains )" Canyon Death Valley Sequoia-Kings ¤£101 Canyon Pinnacles National Monument John Malpais Krebs 395 Mesa Funeral Kings £ Mountains Canyon/Sequoia ¤ National Park Coso Ventana Golden Range Trout Resting Spring Los Sequoia Range Padres South Sierra Nopah Range Sacatar Argus Trail Range Ibex Pahrump Valley Silver Peak Owens Kingston Peak Range Mesquite 41 Sequoia Death «¬ Valley 17 Kingston ¬46 Range « Kiavah Avawatz Mountains Castle Mountains El Paso Sequoia Mountains National Monument Golden Hollow Valley Hills Grass Valley 58 Machesna ¬ )" Mountain « Soda San Luis Garcia Mountains Obispo ¬99 « Black Dead Mountain Mojave Mountains Carrizo Plain £395 National ¤ 15 Monument ¨¦§ Cady Kelso 5 14 ¨¦§ «¬ «¬58 Mountains Dunes Legend Piute 101 40 Clipper Mountains ¤£ Los Newberry ¨¦§ Mountain San Mountains Bristol Mountains Padres Chumash Rodman Rafael Mountains Mojave Trails National Monuments Protected by CalWild Trilobite National Chemehuevi Dick Smith Monument Stepladder Mountains Other National Monuments Mountains Angeles Sespe Old Woman National Parks Matilija Mountains Santa San Gabriel Cadiz Turtle Barbara Mountains National Dunes Mountains Whipple Designated Wild & Scenic Rivers Protected by CalWild )" Monument Mountains 95 San ¤£ Angeles San Sheep Cleghorn Wilderness Protected by CalWild Mountain Bernardino Sheephole )" 126 118 Gabriel Lakes «¬ «¬ Valley San «¬23 Wilderness Study Areas Protected by CalWild Buenaventura ¤£101 134 710 210 ¬259 210 San Gorgonio San Gorgonio Joshua «¬ «¬ ¨¦§ «)" «¬ Riverside 605 San Bernardino Sand To Snow Tree Rice Mountains Los Angeles 10 § 71 National Pinto Joshua Tree ¨¦ Mountains Other Wilderness )" «¬ Monument Valley ¨¦§ «¬60 National Park 110 § 710 )" Channel Islands ¨¦ Lands with Wilderness Characteristics Protected by CalWild § Riverside National Park ¨¦ 105 57 ¨¦§ «¬ 91 5 «¬ CA Desert NCL Protected by CalWild ¨¦§ Palen/McCoy 405 San ¨¦§ 261 Jacinto ¬22 )" «¬ « Cleveland San State Parks Santa Ana 10 133 Bernardino Mecca ¨¦§ ¬ Hills Chuckwalla « 215 «¬241 ¨¦§ Orocopia Mountains Santa Santa Mountains National Forests 73 «¬ San Rosa Rosa Mateo Canyon Santa Rosa-San Jacinto Mountains BLM Lands National Monument Palo Verde Agua Mountains Tibia Cleveland 15 ¨¦§ Salton Sea Indian «¬78 Pass ² Little Picacho ¬56 0 12.5 25 50 Miles « Sawtooth Mountains «¬163 «¬125 ¨¦§8 111 «¬7 Cleveland ¤£ )"San Diego Jacumba ¨¦§805 Cartography: Kurt Menke, GISP Bird's Eye View www.BirdsEyeViewGIS.com Data Sources: USFS, BLM, ESRI & CalWild Date: October 20, 2016.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Wilderness Visitors and Recreation Impacts: Baseline Data Available for Twentieth Century Conditions
    United States Department of Agriculture Wilderness Visitors and Forest Service Recreation Impacts: Baseline Rocky Mountain Research Station Data Available for Twentieth General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-117 Century Conditions September 2003 David N. Cole Vita Wright Abstract __________________________________________ Cole, David N.; Wright, Vita. 2003. Wilderness visitors and recreation impacts: baseline data available for twentieth century conditions. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-117. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 52 p. This report provides an assessment and compilation of recreation-related monitoring data sources across the National Wilderness Preservation System (NWPS). Telephone interviews with managers of all units of the NWPS and a literature search were conducted to locate studies that provide campsite impact data, trail impact data, and information about visitor characteristics. Of the 628 wildernesses that comprised the NWPS in January 2000, 51 percent had baseline campsite data, 9 percent had trail condition data and 24 percent had data on visitor characteristics. Wildernesses managed by the Forest Service and National Park Service were much more likely to have data than wildernesses managed by the Bureau of Land Management and Fish and Wildlife Service. Both unpublished data collected by the management agencies and data published in reports are included. Extensive appendices provide detailed information about available data for every study that we located. These have been organized by wilderness so that it is easy to locate all the information available for each wilderness in the NWPS. Keywords: campsite condition, monitoring, National Wilderness Preservation System, trail condition, visitor characteristics The Authors _______________________________________ David N.
    [Show full text]
  • March 21, 2014
    Welcome to the 32nd Annual Wild Flower Hotline, brought to you by the Theodore Payne Foundation, a non-profit plant nursery, seed source, book store, and education center dedicated to the preservation of wild flowers and California native plants. This a report for March 21, 2014. New reports will be posted each Friday through the end of May. The Mojave Desert is still the place to be this week, although I will include a few more good sights as many of you are starting Spring Break and may want to explore other areas as well. Let’s start with our first report from the Southern Sierra near Sequoia & Kings Canyon National Parks. The park region has had a dry season. Blooming appears to be early and short, but along Hwy 198 near Sequoia National Park look for Western redbud (Cercis occidentalis) in full bloom now. There have been spotty sightings of silver bush lupine (Lupinus albifrons) as well. There are bright orange patches of fiddleneck (Amsinckia menziesii) and the California poppies (Eschscholzia californica) are just starting to appear. Further north at Yosemite/Hetch Hetchy, flowers are starting to bloom, but it is still early in the season. Because of the Rim Fire last year, the only trail available is the one from the dam to Wapama and Rancheria Falls. (The trail to Poopenaut Valley is closed.) In the moist areas look for red maids (Calandrinia ciliata), and a few harlequin lupines (Lupinus stiversii), which are just getting started. Some of the larger pools of flowing water still contain Sierra newts (Taricha sierrae).
    [Show full text]
  • The California Desert 1661 S
    BLM SPECIAL EDITION 2000 EXAMPLES OF AGENCY SIGNS SURFACE MANAGEMENT STATUS DESERT ACCESS GUIDE Soda Mountains BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT USDA FOREST SERVICE 1:100,000-Scale topographic map showing: Highways, roads and other manmade structures • Water features • Contours and elevations in meters • Recreation sites • Coverage of former desert access guide #8 Irwin NATIONAL PARK SERVICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR I BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS Edited and published by the Bureau of Land Management National Applied Resource Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado in canpi-nilian with the Bureau of Land Management California State Office. Planimetry partially revised by BLM from various source material. Revised information not field checked. Base map prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey. Compiled from USGS 1:24,000 and i:62,500-scale topographic maps dated 1948-1956, and from advance materials. Partially revised from aerial photographs taken CALIFORNIA STATE 1976 1989 and other source data. Revised information not VEHICULAR RECREATION AREA field checked. Map edited 1993. Help protect your public lands by observing posted Projection and 10,000-meter grid, zone 11: Universal OHV designations. Watch for OHV signs and read them carefully. Transverse Mercator. 25,000-foot grid ticks based on California coordinate system, zone 5. 1927 North For more information contact the BLM, USDA Forest American Datum. Service, National Park Service, California State Park, or California State Motorized Vechicle Recreation Area Land lines are omitted in areas of extensive tract surveys. Office (see back panel for address and phone There may be private inholdings within the boundaries of numbers).
    [Show full text]
  • Wilderness Study Areas
    I ___- .-ll..l .“..l..““l.--..- I. _.^.___” _^.__.._._ - ._____.-.-.. ------ FEDERAL LAND M.ANAGEMENT Status and Uses of Wilderness Study Areas I 150156 RESTRICTED--Not to be released outside the General Accounting Wice unless specifically approved by the Office of Congressional Relations. ssBO4’8 RELEASED ---- ---. - (;Ao/li:( ‘I:I)-!L~-l~~lL - United States General Accounting OfTice GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 Resources, Community, and Economic Development Division B-262989 September 23,1993 The Honorable Bruce F. Vento Chairman, Subcommittee on National Parks, Forests, and Public Lands Committee on Natural Resources House of Representatives Dear Mr. Chairman: Concerned about alleged degradation of areas being considered for possible inclusion in the National Wilderness Preservation System (wilderness study areas), you requested that we provide you with information on the types and effects of activities in these study areas. As agreed with your office, we gathered information on areas managed by two agencies: the Department of the Interior’s Bureau of Land Management (BLN) and the Department of Agriculture’s Forest Service. Specifically, this report provides information on (1) legislative guidance and the agency policies governing wilderness study area management, (2) the various activities and uses occurring in the agencies’ study areas, (3) the ways these activities and uses affect the areas, and (4) agency actions to monitor and restrict these uses and to repair damage resulting from them. Appendixes I and II provide data on the number, acreage, and locations of wilderness study areas managed by BLM and the Forest Service, as well as data on the types of uses occurring in the areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Newberry Springs BUREAU of LAND MANAGEMENT
    BLM SPECIAL EDITION 1998 EXAMPLES OF AGENCY SIGNS SURFACE MANAGEMENT STATUS DESERT ACCESS GUIDE Newberry Springs BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT USDA FOREST SERVICE I:100,000-Scale topographic map showing: • Highways, roads and other manmade structures • Water features • Contours and elevations in meters • Recreation sites • Coverage of former desert access guide #11 Johnson Valley NATIONAL PARK SERVICE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR OF f AND MANAGEMENT CALIFORNIA STATE PARKS Edited and published by the Bureau of Land Management National Applied Resource Sciences Center, Denver, Colorado in cooperation with the Bureau of Land Management California State Office. Planimetry partially revised by BLM from various source material. Revised information not field checked. Base map prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey. Compiled from USGS 1:24,000 and l:62,500-scale I -i >|i <i ! . • Kips dated 1953 1971, and from advance T" materials. Partially revised from aerial photographs taken 1976 and other source data. Bev'sed information not CALIFORNIA STATE field checked. Map edited 1977. Map photoinspected VEHICULAR RECREATION AREA using 1989 photographs. No major culture or drainage changes found. Help protect your public lands by observing posted Projection and 10,000-meter grid, zone 11: Universal OHV designations. Watch for OHV signs and read Transverse Mercator. 25,000-foot grid ticks based on them carefully. California coordinate system, zone 5. 1927 North American Datum. For more information contact the BLM, USDA Forest Service, National Park Service, California State Park, Land lines are omitted in areas of extensive tract surveys. or California State Motorized Vechicle Recreation Area Office (see back panel for address and phone There may be private inholdings within the boundaries of numbers).
    [Show full text]
  • The California Desert CONSERVATION AREA PLAN 1980 As Amended
    the California Desert CONSERVATION AREA PLAN 1980 as amended U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management Desert District Riverside, California the California Desert CONSERVATION AREA PLAN 1980 as Amended IN REPLY REFER TO United States Department of the Interior BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT STATE OFFICE Federal Office Building 2800 Cottage Way Sacramento, California 95825 Dear Reader: Thank you.You and many other interested citizens like you have made this California Desert Conservation Area Plan. It was conceived of your interests and concerns, born into law through your elected representatives, molded by your direct personal involvement, matured and refined through public conflict, interaction, and compromise, and completed as a result of your review, comment and advice. It is a good plan. You have reason to be proud. Perhaps, as individuals, we may say, “This is not exactly the plan I would like,” but together we can say, “This is a plan we can agree on, it is fair, and it is possible.” This is the most important part of all, because this Plan is only a beginning. A plan is a piece of paper-what counts is what happens on the ground. The California Desert Plan encompasses a tremendous area and many different resources and uses. The decisions in the Plan are major and important, but they are only general guides to site—specific actions. The job ahead of us now involves three tasks: —Site-specific plans, such as grazing allotment management plans or vehicle route designation; —On-the-ground actions, such as granting mineral leases, developing water sources for wildlife, building fences for livestock pastures or for protecting petroglyphs; and —Keeping people informed of and involved in putting the Plan to work on the ground, and in changing the Plan to meet future needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Desert Bighorn Sheep Report
    California Department of Fish and Wildlife Region 6 Desert Bighorn Sheep Status Report November 2013 to October 2016 A summary of desert bighorn sheep population monitoring and management by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife Authors: Paige Prentice, Ashley Evans, Danielle Glass, Richard Ianniello, and Tom Stephenson Inland Deserts Region California Department of Fish and Wildlife Desert Bighorn Status Report 2013-2016 California Department of Fish and Wildlife Inland Deserts Region 787 N. Main Street Ste. 220 Bishop, CA 93514 www.wildlife.ca.gov This document was finalized on September 6, 2018 Page 2 of 40 California Department of Fish and Wildlife Desert Bighorn Status Report 2013-2016 Table of Contents Executive Summary …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………4 I. Monitoring ............................................................................................................................................ 6 A. Data Collection Methods .................................................................................................................. 7 1. Capture Methods .......................................................................................................................... 7 2. Survey Methods ............................................................................................................................ 8 B. Results and Discussion .................................................................................................................... 10 1. Capture Data ..............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Volume 2
    Society for the Conservation of Bighorn Sheep Sheep Sheet - Volume 2 – September 2020 www.desertbighorn.org Before the project began, collection box area in sad shape After the project: a formal, robust spring box Redwood Spring Box Installed at Castle Mine Spring By Debbie Miller Marschke SCBS has been working to improve the natural spring at the Castle Mine location for many years. Mining ruins and a dilapidated cabin remain as evidence that this spring has a history of folks teasing out the precious water from this location. There is always an overgrowth of vegetation at the spring which is proof positive that the spring is active, even if the flow rate is minimal. Bighorn Sheep biologists have GPS data from collared sheep in the mountain range that prove the Bighorn Sheep wander along the backbones of the ridges; occasionally they visit this spring but they mainly depend on the big game guzzlers to the north of this location. Nevertheless, each water location in a mountain range is crucial in the network of water sources available. SCBS crews have dug out and cleared the guzzler intake Johnson screen several times on previous occasions which has been very frustrating because a spring box had never been installed. The water seeps from the entrance of an old mine adit in the side of a hill. The hill face and adit entrance are unstable, and thus dirt caves in and has buried the intake system time and time again. On the weekend of May 15-17, 2020, a modest SCBS strike force sought to make one final but meaningful attempt to boost water output from Castle Mine spring.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Goals and Objectives
    Appendix C Biological Goals and Objectives Draft DRECP and EIR/EIS APPENDIX C. BIOLOGICAL GOALS AND OBJECTIVES C BIOLOGICAL GOALS AND OBJECTIVES C.1 Process for Developing the Biological Goals and Objectives This section outlines the process for drafting the Biological Goals and Objectives (BGOs) and describes how they inform the conservation strategy for the Desert Renewable Energy Conservation Plan (DRECP or Plan). The conceptual model shown in Exhibit C-1 illustrates the structure of the BGOs used during the planning process. This conceptual model articulates how Plan-wide BGOs and other information (e.g., stressors) contribute to the development of Conservation and Management Actions (CMAs) associated with Covered Activities, which are monitored for effectiveness and adapted as necessary to meet the DRECP Step-Down Biological Objectives. Terms used in Exhibit C-1 are defined in Section C.1.1. Exhibit C-1 Conceptual Model for BGOs Development Appendix C C-1 August 2014 Draft DRECP and EIR/EIS APPENDIX C. BIOLOGICAL GOALS AND OBJECTIVES The BGOs follow the three-tiered approach based on the concepts of scale: landscape, natural community, and species. The following broad biological goals established in the DRECP Planning Agreement guided the development of the BGOs: Provide for the long-term conservation and management of Covered Species within the Plan Area. Preserve, restore, and enhance natural communities and ecosystems that support Covered Species within the Plan Area. The following provides the approach to developing the BGOs. Section C.2 provides the landscape, natural community, and Covered Species BGOs. Specific mapping information used to develop the BGOs is provided in Section C.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Granite Mountains Wilderness Study Area, San Bernardino County, California
    Mineral Resources of the Bristol/ Granite Mountains Wilderness Study Area, San Bernardino County, California U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1712-C Chapter C Mineral Resources of the Bristol/Granite Mountains Wilderness Study Area, San Bernardino County, California By KEITH A. HOWARD, JAMES E. KILBURN, ROBERT W. SIMPSON, TODD T. FITZGIBBON, DAVID E. DETRA, and GARY L. RAINES U.S. Geological Survey CHARLES SABINE U.S. Bureau of Mines U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1712 MINERAL RESOURCES OF WILDERNESS STUDY AREAS: CENTRAL CALIFORNIA DESERT CONSERVATION AREA DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR DONALD PAUL MODEL, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON: 1987 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Section U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Box 25425 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Mineral resources of the Bristol/Granite Mountains Wilderness Study Area, San Bernardino County, California. U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1712-C Bibliography Supt. of Docs. No.: I 19.3:1712-C 1. Mines and mineral resources California Bristol/ Granite Mountains Wilderness. 2. Geology Bristol/ Granite Mountains Wilderness. 3. Bristol/Granite Mountains Wilderness (Calif.) I. Howard, Keith A. II. Geological Survey (U.S.) III. Series. QE75.B9 No. 1712-C 557.3 s 87-600062 fTN24.C2l [553'.09794'95l STUDIES RELATED TO WILDERNESS Bureau of Land Management Wilderness Study Areas The Federal Land Policy and Management Act (Public Law 94-579, October 21, 1976) requires the U.S. Geological Survey and the U.S. Bureau of Mines to conduct mineral surveys on certain areas to determine the mineral values, if any, that may be present.
    [Show full text]
  • Jerome E. Perez State Director Bureau of Land Management California State Office 2800 Cottage Way, Suite W-1623 Sacramento, CA 95825
    Jerome E. Perez State Director Bureau of Land Management California State Office 2800 Cottage Way, Suite W-1623 Sacramento, CA 95825 May 20, 2016 Dear Director Perez: This letter is written on behalf of San Diego Mineral & Gem Society’s 800 dues-paying members and nearly 1500 newsletter subscribers. It is our understanding that the creation of a Mojave Trails National Monument sub-group will be considered at the Desert District Advisory Council meeting on May 21st in Barstow. We support the creation of a sub-group, and we look forward to providing input to it. At this time, we respectfully request inclusion of explicit language accommodating rockhounding and rock and invertebrate fossil collecting (collectively “rock collecting”) in the Mojave Trails National Monument Management Plan. We feel this is necessary because the absence of such language stirred immense confusion and consternation within the community of rockhounds and 110 mineral club affiliates of the California Federation of Mineralogical Societies (CFMS) after the Proclamation was announced on February 12th of this year. We are grateful for your response and prompt action on May 13th, which clarified BLM’s position recognizing rockhounding as a legitimate recreational pursuit in the Mojave Trails National Monument. We are also encouraged to have Senator Dianne Feinstein’s support. In a letter to Secretary Sally Jewell dated May 12, 2016 (see enclosed letter), Senator Feinstein affirmed her support clearly and eloquently: “Having heard from the highly dedicated and enthusiastic rockhounding community on this issue, I worked to accommodate their interests in the California Desert Conservation and Recreation Act (S.414)—the impetus for the President’s recent designation of the aforementioned national monuments [Mojave Trails, Sand to Snow, and Castle Mountains].
    [Show full text]
  • Mojave Miocene Robert E
    Mojave Miocene Robert E. Reynolds, editor California State University Desert Studies Center 2015 Desert Symposium April 2015 Front cover: Rainbow Basin syncline, with rendering of saber cat by Katura Reynolds. Back cover: Cajon Pass Title page: Jedediah Smith’s party crossing the burning Mojave Desert during the 1826 trek to California by Frederic Remington Past volumes in the Desert Symposium series may be accessed at <http://nsm.fullerton.edu/dsc/desert-studies-center-additional-information> 2 2015 desert symposium Table of contents Mojave Miocene: the field trip 7 Robert E. Reynolds and David M. Miller Miocene mammal diversity of the Mojave region in the context of Great Basin mammal history 34 Catherine Badgley, Tara M. Smiley, Katherine Loughney Regional and local correlations of feldspar geochemistry of the Peach Spring Tuff, Alvord Mountain, California 44 David C. Buesch Phytoliths of the Barstow Formation through the Middle Miocene Climatic Optimum: preliminary findings 51 Katharine M. Loughney and Selena Y. Smith A fresh look at the Pickhandle Formation: Pyroclastic flows and fossiliferous lacustrine sediments 59 Jennifer Garrison and Robert E. Reynolds Biochronology of Brachycrus (Artiodactyla, Oreodontidae) and downward relocation of the Hemingfordian– Barstovian North American Land Mammal Age boundary in the respective type areas 63 E. Bruce Lander Mediochoerus (Mammalia, Artiodactyla, Oreodontidae, Ticholeptinae) from the Barstow and Hector Formations of the central Mojave Desert Province, southern California, and the Runningwater and Olcott Formations of the northern Nebraska Panhandle—Implications of changes in average adult body size through time and faunal provincialism 83 E. Bruce Lander Review of peccaries from the Barstow Formation of California 108 Donald L.
    [Show full text]