DOCSLIB.ORG

Cleveland Clinic Anticoagulation Management Program (C-Camp)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cleveland Clinic Anticoagulation Management Program (C-Camp) CLEVELAND CLINIC ANTICOAGULATION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM (C-CAMP) 1 Table of Contents I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................................................... 6 II. VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM RISK ASSESSMENT AND PROPHYLAXIS ............................................. 9 III. RECOMMENDED PROPHYLAXIS OPTIONS FOR THE PREVENTION OF VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM. ........................................................................................................................................ 10 IIIA. RECOMMENDED PROPHYLAXIS OPTIONS FOR THE PREVENTION OF VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM BASED ON RISK FACTOR ASSESSMENT ............................................................. 12 A) UNFRACTIONATED HEPARIN (UFH) ................................................................................................................... 14 B) LOW MOLECULAR WEIGHT HEPARIN (LMWH) ENOXAPARIN (LOVENOX®) .............................................. 14 C) FONDAPARINUX/ (ARIXTRA®) …………………………………………………………………………..……16 D) RIVAROXABAN (XARELTO®) .......................................................................................................................... 16 E) DESIRUDIN (IPRIVASK®)………………………………………………………………………………..…….17 F) WARFARIN/COUMADIN®) ............................................................................................................................... 16 G) ASPIRIN……………………………………………………………………………………………………..……18 H) INTERMITTENT PNEUMATIC COMPRESSION DEVICES ...................................................................................... 18 I) GRADUATED COMPRESSION STOCKINGS ............................................................................................................ 18 J ) EARLY AMBULATION .......................................................................................................................................... 19 IV. DIAGNOSIS OF VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM .......................................................................................... 19 V. TREATMENT OF VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM ....................................................................................... 24 A) UNFRACTIONATED HEPARIN (UFH) ................................................................................................................ 26 B) LOW MOLECULAR WEIGHT HEPARIN (LMWH) ENOXAPARIN/ (LOVENOX®) ............................................ 30 C) FONDAPARINUX (ARIXTRA®) .......................................................................................................................... 32 D) ALTEPLASE/ACTIVASE® (RT-PA) .................................................................................................................... 33 E) RIVAROXABAN (XALERTO®)…………………………………………………………………………………..34 F) WARFARIN (COUMADIN®) ............................................................................................................................... 35 G) INFERIOR VENA CAVA FILTERS ....................................................................................................................... 37 H) COMPRESSION STOCKINGS - PREVENTION OF THE POST-THROMBOTIC SYNDROME .................................... 37 I) DIETARY ROLE IN THE MANAGEMENT OF VTE .............................................................................................. 38 VI. TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES STEMI .................................... 39 VII. TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROMES NSTEMI.................................. 41 VIII. TREATMENT OF PATIENTS UNDERGOING PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION ......... 42 A) UNFRACTIONATED HEPARIN (UFH) ................................................................................................................ 44 B) LOW MOLECULAR WEIGHT HEPARIN (LMWH) ENOXAPARIN(LOVENOX®) ............................................... 48 C) BIVALIRUDIN (ANGIOMAX®) ............................................................................................................................ 50 D) TENECTEPLASE (TNKASE®) ............................................................................................................................ 51 IX. TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH ATRIAL FIBRILLATION ..................................................................... 52 A) UNFRACTIONATED HEPARIN ............................................................................................................................ 54 B) LOW MOLECULAR WEIGHT HEPARIN (LMWH) ENOXAPARIN (LOVENOX®) .............................................. 58 C) WARFARIN (Coumadin®)................................................................................................................................59 D) DABIGATRAN (PRADAXA®).........................................................................................................................61 E) RIVAROXABAN (XARELTO®).....................................................................................................................62 X. TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH PROSTHETIC HEART VALVES ......................................................... 64 A) ANTICOAGULATION POST MECHANICAL HEART VALVE REPLACEMENT SURGERY ...................................... 66 B) PREGNANCY AND MECHANICAL HEART VALVES ............................................................................................ 66 C) ANTICOAGULATION POST BIOPROSTHETIC VALVE REPLACEMENT SURGERY ............................................. 67 D) UNFRACTIONATED HEPARIN ............................................................................................................................ 67 E) LOW MOLECULAR WEIGHT HEPARIN (LMWH) ENOXAPARIN (LOVENOX®) .............................................. 70 XI. WARFARIN FOR ACS, ATRIAL FIBRILLATION, PROSTHETIC HEART VALVES ................................ 72 2 XII. TREATMENT OF ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE ............................................................................................... 75 XIII. COMPLICATIONS OF ANTICOAGULATION ................................................................................................... 84 A) HEPARIN INDUCED THROMBOCYTOPENIA ....................................................................................................... 87 XIV. REVERSAL GUIDELINES OF PARENTAL AND ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS A) HEPARIN…………………………………………………….………………………………………………....85 B) LOW MOLECULAR WEIGHT HEPARIN…….………………………………………………………..…..86 C) ANTI-XA INHIBITORS……………………………………………………………………………………………86 D) DIRECT THROMBIN INHIBITORS…………………………………………………………………………………87 XV. BRIDGING THERAPY ............................................................................................................................................ 89 A) LMWH AS A PERIOPERATIVE BRIDGING AGENT .............................................................................. 91 B) UNFRACTIONATED HEPARIN AS A PERIOPERATIVE BRIDGING AGENT .................................. 91 C) DABIGATRAN AS A PERIOPERATIVE BRIDGING AGENT D) XARELTO AS A PREOPERATIVE BRIDGING AGENT XVI. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR ORAL ANTICOAGULANTS: WARFARIN (COUMADIN®) DABIGATRAN ( PRADAXA®), RIVAROXABAN (XARELTO®) FOR THE PATIENT AT DISCHARGE 93 A) CONTRAINDICATIONS ....................................................................................................................................... 93 B) RISK AND BENEFITS OF WARFARIN THERAPY. ................................................................................................ 93 C) PATIENT INSTRUCTIONS FOR UNDERSTANDING WARFARIN/COUMADIN® .................................................... 93 3 List of Tables and Figures TABLE 1. AVAILABLE ANTICOAGULANTS AT CLEVELAND CLINIC HOSPITALS………………………………………….…....8 TABLE 2. SUMMARY OF VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM PROPHYLAXIS OPTIONS - GENERAL ................................................. 10 TABLE 3. RECOMMENDED PROPHYLAXIS OPTIONS FOR PREVENTION OF VTE BASED ON RISK FACTOR ASSESSMENT ......... 12 TABLE 4. CLINICAL DECISION RULE TO HELP DETERMINE THE PRETEST PROBABILITY FOR DVT ........................................ 20 FIGURE 1. ALGORITHM FOR DIAGNOSING DVT ...................................................................................................................... 21 TABLE 5. CLINICAL DECISION RULE TO DETERMINE THE PRETEST PROBABILITY OF PE ....................................................... 22 FIGURE 2. ALGORITHM FOR DIAGNOSING PE ......................................................................................................................... 23 TABLE 6. SUMMARY TABLE OF PHARMACEUTICAL AGENTS, DOSING GUIDELINES FOR TREATMENT OF VTE* .................... 24 TABLE 7. HEPARIN NOMOGRAM ORDERS FOR THE TREATMENT OF ACUTE VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM .......................... 27 TABLE 8. TARGET INR FOR THE TREATMENT OF ACUTE VTE ............................................................................................... 35 TABLE 9. SUMMARY TABLE OF PHARMACOLOGICAL AGENTS, DOSING GUIDELINES FOR ACS (STEMI) ............................. 39 TABLE 10. SUMMARY TABLE OF PHARMACOLOGICAL AGENTS, DOSING GUIDELINES FOR ACS.(NSTEMI) .......................... 41 TABLE 11. SUMMARY TABLE OF PATIENTS UNDERGOING PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION ................................. 42 TABLE 12. HEPARIN NOMOGRAM PHYSICIAN’S ORDER FOR ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME PATIENTS .................................. 45 FIGURE 3. DOSING GUIDELINES FOR TENECTEPLASE………………………………………………….………………..…......51 TABLE 13. SUMMARY OF PHARMACEUTICAL
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Enoxaparin Sodium Solution for Injection, Manufacturer's Standard
    PRODUCT MONOGRAPH INCLUDING PATIENT MEDICATION INFORMATION PrLOVENOX® Enoxaparin sodium solution for injection 30 mg in 0.3 mL solution (100 mg/mL), pre-filled syringes for subcutaneous or intravenous injection 40 mg in 0.4 mL solution (100 mg/mL), pre-filled syringes for subcutaneous or intravenous injection 60 mg in 0.6 mL solution (100 mg/mL), pre-filled syringes for subcutaneous or intravenous injection 80 mg in 0.8 mL solution (100 mg/mL), pre-filled syringes for subcutaneous or intravenous injection 100 mg in 1 mL solution (100 mg/mL), pre-filled syringes for subcutaneous or intravenous injection 300 mg in 3 mL solution (100 mg/mL), multidose vials for subcutaneous or intravenous injection PrLOVENOX® HP Enoxaparin sodium (High Potency) solution for injection 120 mg in 0.8 mL solution (150 mg/mL), pre-filled syringes for subcutaneous or intravenous injection 150 mg in 1 mL solution (150 mg/mL), pre-filled syringes for subcutaneous or intravenous injection Manufacturer’s standard Anticoagulant/Antithrombotic Agent ATC Code: B01AB05 Product Monograph – LOVENOX (enoxaparin) Page 1 of 113 sanofi-aventis Canada Inc. Date of Initial Approval: 2905 Place Louis-R.-Renaud February 9, 1993 Laval, Quebec H7V 0A3 Date of Revision September 7, 2021 Submission Control Number: 252514 s-a version 15.0 dated September 7, 2021 Product Monograph – LOVENOX (enoxaparin) Page 2 of 113 TABLE OF CONTENTS Sections or subsections that are not applicable at the time of authorization are not listed. TABLE OF CONTENTS ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Rivaroxaban Versus Warfarin for Treatment and Prevention Of
    Costa et al. Thrombosis Journal (2020) 18:6 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12959-020-00219-w RESEARCH Open Access Rivaroxaban versus warfarin for treatment and prevention of recurrence of venous thromboembolism in African American patients: a retrospective cohort analysis Olivia S. Costa1,2, Stanley Thompson3, Veronica Ashton4, Michael Palladino5, Thomas J. Bunz6 and Craig I. Coleman1,2* Abstract Background: African Americans are under-represented in trials evaluating oral anticoagulants for the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism (VTE). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban versus warfarin for the treatment of VTE in African Americans. Methods: We utilized Optum® De-Identified Electronic Health Record data from 11/1/2012–9/30/2018. We included African Americans experiencing an acute VTE during a hospital or emergency department visit, who received rivaroxaban or warfarin as their first oral anticoagulant within 7-days of the acute VTE event and had ≥1 provider visit in the prior 12-months. Differences in baseline characteristics between cohorts were adjusted using inverse probability-of-treatment weighting based on propensity scores (standard differences < 0.10 were achieved for all covariates). Our primary endpoint was the composite of recurrent VTE or major bleeding at 6-months. Three- and 12-month timepoints were also assessed. Secondary endpoints included recurrent VTE and major bleeding as individual endpoints. Cohort risk was compared using Cox regression and reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: We identified 2097 rivaroxaban and 2842 warfarin users with incident VTE. At 6-months, no significant differences in the composite endpoint (HR = 0.96, 95%CI = 0.75–1.24), recurrent VTE (HR = 1.02, 95%CI = 0.76–1.36) or major bleeding alone (HR = 0.93, 95%CI = 0.59–1.47) were observed between cohorts.
    [Show full text]
  • Recurrent Leg Cellulitis: Pathogenesis, Tre.Atment, and Prevention
    J Am Board Fam Pract: first published as 10.3122/jabfm.5.1.85 on 1 January 1992. Downloaded from Recurrent Leg Cellulitis: Pathogenesis, Tre.atment, And Prevention Roben P. Pierce, M.D., and Allen]. Daugird, M.D. Recurrent cellulitis can develop in a variety of therapy. Subsequently, she developed chronic bi­ settings. Recurrent febrile episodes associated lateral lower leg edema before her first hospital­ with arm or leg infections, sometimes described ization at our institution. as erysipelatous, have been noted for years to Upon admission, she denied fever, chills, nau­ occur in the setting of filarial, postoperative, or sea, vomiting, shortness of breath, or chest pain. idiopathic chronic lymphedema. I More recently, She reported bilateral tubal ligation and ovarian recurrent cellulitis has been described as a late cyst removal more than 20 years ago. Five years complication of coronary artery bypass venec­ ago she had a radical mastectomy for adenocarci­ tomy,2-8 pelvic surgery, such as vulvectomy with noma of the breast but had negative lymph nodes lymphadenectomy9 or hysterectomy with lym­ and underwent no further treatment. There was ph adenectomy, 10 or of pelvic irradiation after hys­ no history of cellulitis of the right arm after the terectomy.11,12 The cause of recurrent cellulitis mastectomy. She denied any other pelvic surgery, has not been precisely defined but appears to be leg surgery, or abdominal or pelvic irradiation. multifactorial, involving mechanical, infectious, On examination, her temperature was 37.4°C and immune-mediated factors. We present a case (99.32°F), blood pressure 144/84 mmHg, pulse 80 of a woman with recurrent cellulitis of the legs beats per minute, and respirations 24/minute.
    [Show full text]
  • Kengrexal, INN-Cangrelor Tetrasodium
    ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS 1 1. NAME OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT Kengrexal 50 mg powder for concentrate for solution for injection/infusion 2. QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION Each vial contains cangrelor tetrasodium corresponding to 50 mg cangrelor. After reconstitution 1 mL of concentrate contains 10 mg cangrelor. After dilution 1 mL of solution contains 200 micrograms cangrelor. Excipient with known effect Each vial contains 52.2 mg sorbitol. For the full list of excipients, see section 6.1. 3. PHARMACEUTICAL FORM Powder for concentrate for solution for injection/infusion. White to off-white lyophilised powder. 4. CLINICAL PARTICULARS 4.1 Therapeutic indications Kengrexal, co-administered with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), is indicated for the reduction of thrombotic cardiovascular events in adult patients with coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) who have not received an oral P2Y12 inhibitor prior to the PCI procedure and in whom oral therapy with P2Y12 inhibitors is not feasible or desirable. 4.2 Posology and method of administration Kengrexal should be administered by a physician experienced in either acute coronary care or in coronary intervention procedures and is intended for specialised use in an acute and hospital setting. Posology The recommended dose of Kengrexal for patients undergoing PCI is a 30 micrograms/kg intravenous bolus followed immediately by 4 micrograms/kg/min intravenous infusion. The bolus and infusion should be initiated prior to the procedure and continued for at least two hours or for the duration of the procedure, whichever is longer. At the discretion of the physician, the infusion may be continued for a total duration of four hours, see section 5.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Safety of Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis with Fondaparinux in Ischemic Stroke☆
    Thrombosis Research 135 (2015) 249–254 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Thrombosis Research journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/thromres Regular Article Safety of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis with fondaparinux in ischemic stroke☆ C.T. Hackett a,d,1, R.S. Ramanathan a,1, K. Malhotra a,M.R.Quigleyb,c,K.M.Kellya,c,M.Tiana,J.Protetcha, C. Wong a,c,D.G.Wrighta,c,A.H.Tayala,c,⁎ a Department of Neurology and Allegheny General Hospital Comprehensive Stroke Center, University of South Carolina b Department of Neurosurgery and Allegheny General Hospital, University of South Carolina c Drexel University College of Medicine, University of South Carolina d Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina article info abstract Article history: Introduction: Unfractionated heparin (UFH), low molecular weight heparin or fondaparinux are recommended Received 19 June 2014 for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in acutely ill medical patients. There are limited data on the Received in revised form 11 September 2014 safety of fondaparinux for VTE prophylaxis in ischemic stroke. We examined adverse event frequency in Accepted 4 November 2014 hospitalized patients with ischemic stroke who received VTE prophylaxis with fondaparinux versus UFH. Available online 13 December 2014 Materials and Methods: We performed a propensity score matched analysis on a retrospective cohort of 644 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving fondaparinux (n = 322) or UFH (n = 322) for VTE prophylaxis. Patients who received intravenous tPA and continuous intravenous infusions of UFH were excluded. The primary outcome was major hemorrhage (intracranial or extracranial) and the secondary outcome was total hemorrhage (major and minor hemorrhage) during hospitalization.
    [Show full text]
  • 201370Orig1s000
    CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH APPLICATION NUMBER: 201370Orig1s000 MEDICAL REVIEW(S) M E M O R A N D U M DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH Date: July 8, 2011 From: Kathy M. Robie-Suh, M.D., Ph.D. Medical Team Leader Division of Hematology Products Subject: NDA 201370, resubmission April 11, 2011 Heparin Sodium Injection (heparin sodium, USP) Sponsor: Pfizer, Inc. 235 East 42nd Street New York, NY 10017-5755 To: NDA 201370 This is the second review cycle for this 505(b)(2) application for a new Heparin Sodium Injection product derived from porcine intestine. The presentations include several containing benzyl alcohol as a preservative and one preservative-free presentation. The first cycle review of the NDA found the application acceptable from a clinical viewpoint. However, manufacturing facilities inspection identified deficiencies that precluded approval and a Complete Response (CR) letter was issued on April 7, 2011. Labeling review was not completed at that time. In the current resubmission the sponsor has responded to the identified deficiencies deleting the two heparin supplier sites where deficiencies were found. The Amended Cross-Discipline Team Leader Review by Dr. Ali Al-Hakim (6/28/2011) comments that Office of Compliance has updated its recommendation in the Establishment Evaluation System and issued “ACCEPTABLE” overall recommendation for this NDA on June 27, 2011 and therefore the NDA is recommended for approval. No new clinical information is included in the resubmission. Clinical review of the original application and the resubmission was conducted by Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Warfarin in the Oldest Adults With
    CLINICAL INVESTIGATION Dabigatran, Rivaroxaban, and Warfarin in the Oldest Adults with Atrial Fibrillation in Taiwan Chao-Lun Lai, MD, PhD,*†‡§ Ho-Min Chen, MS,† Min-Tsun Liao, MD,* and Ting-Tse Lin, MD* mortality and cardiovascular mortality than those who OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness and safety of used warfarin. Reduced-dose dabigatran was also associ- reduced-dose dabigatran, reduced-dose rivaroxaban, and warfa- ated with lower risk of intracranial hemorrhage than war- rin in individuals aged 85 and older with atrial fibrillation (AF). farin. J Am AmGeriatr GeriatrSoc Soc66:1567–1574, 2018. 2018. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Taiwan National Health Insurance claims database, 20112015. Key words: dabigatran; rivaroxaban; warfarin; effec- PARTICIPANTS: Individuals with AF aged 85 and older tiveness; safety; octogenarian (mean 88.6) with incident use of oral anticoagulants between June 1, 2012 and May 31, 2015 (N54,722; dabi- gatran 110 mg, n51,489; rivaroxaban 15 mg/10 mg, n51,736; warfarin, n51,497). MEASUREMENTS: Clinical outcomes included all-cause death, cardiovascular death, ischemic stroke, acute myocardial he risk of ischemic stroke is 5 times as high in individ- infarction, arterial embolism or thrombosis, intracranial hem- T uals with atrial fibrillation (AF) than in those with- orrhage, and gastrointestinal hemorrhage needing transfusion. out.1 Warfarin, the classic vitamin K antagonist, can reduce 2 Propensity score–matched analysis was performed, and the the risk of ischemic stroke by approximately 60%, but the marginal proportional hazards model was used to estimate the narrow therapeutic window and risk of bleeding complica- relative risk of various clinical outcomes in a matched tions associated with warfarin therapy have led to its being 1 dabigatran-warfarin cohort (n51,180 in each group) and a underused.
    [Show full text]
  • • All Doacs Are Cleared to Some Extent by the Kidneys
    • All DOACs are cleared to some extent by the kidneys – Dabigatran 80% – Rivaroxaban 33% – Apixaban 25% – Potential for drug accumulation in patients with severe renal impairment especially below eGFRs <30 Warfarin is unaffected by renal impairment (only • Rivaroxaban & Apixaban are both oral direct inhibitor of factor Xa. • Rivaroxaban doses recommended for clinical use are 15mg od and 20 mg od (15 mg bd for first 3 weeks of treatment of DVT). • Apixaban 5mg bd or 2.5mg bd • Rivaroxaban peak plasma levels are reached 2 to 3 h after ingestion • Apixaban peak plasma levels are reached ~3hrs after ingestion • Rivaroxaban is taken with food – Apixaban without food • Rivaroxaban is 33% renaly excreted and has a half-life of 9 h in patients with normal renal function. – There is an analogy with Therapeutic LMWH – We very rarely ask for an anti-Xa assay • And what is the clinical significance of a Xa assay ? (Cut off values are largely arbitrary) – Fixed doses – Importance of When the last dose was taken ? – Importance of What is the renal function ? – If bleeding • What is the nature of the bleeding ? • In extremis we can give protamine sulphate (? Efficacy) • How to manage bleeding on a DOAC? –How severe is the bleeding ? –When was the last dose of medication ? –What is the renal function ? – Recheck –If minor bleeding; epistaxis, gingival, bruising, menorrhagia • Withhold the NOAC (when was the last dose taken?) • Recheck renal function • Check FBC • Local measures • Unlikely to require further intervention – Re-challenge – ? Switch NOAC
    [Show full text]
  • Low Molecular Weight Heparins and Heparinoids
    NEW DRUGS, OLD DRUGS NEW DRUGS, OLD DRUGS Low molecular weight heparins and heparinoids John W Eikelboom and Graeme J Hankey UNFRACTIONATED HEPARIN has been used in clinical ABSTRACT practice for more than 50 years and is established as an effective parenteral anticoagulant for the prevention and ■ Several low molecular weight (LMW) heparin treatment of various thrombotic disorders. However, low preparations, including dalteparin, enoxaparin and molecularThe Medical weight Journal (LMW) of heparinsAustralia haveISSN: recently 0025-729X emerged 7 October as nadroparin, as well as the heparinoid danaparoid sodium, more2002 convenient, 177 6 379-383 safe and effective alternatives to unfrac- are approved for use in Australia. 1 tionated©The heparin Medical (BoxJournal 1). of AustraliaIn Australia, 2002 wwwLMW.mja.com.au heparins are ■ LMW heparins are replacing unfractionated heparin for replacingNew Drugs,unfractionated Old Drugs heparin for preventing and treating the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism venous thromboembolism and for the initial treatment of and the treatment of non-ST-segment-elevation acute unstable acute coronary syndromes. The LMW heparinoid coronary syndromes. danaparoid sodium is widely used to treat immune heparin- ■ induced thrombocytopenia. The advantages of LMW heparins over unfractionated heparin include a longer half-life (allowing once-daily or twice-daily subcutaneous dosing), high bioavailability and Limitations of unfractionated heparin predictable anticoagulant response (avoiding the need
    [Show full text]
  • Product Monograph
    PRODUCT MONOGRAPH PrFONDAPARINUX SODIUM INJECTION 2.5 mg/0.5 mL , 5.0 mg/0.4 mL, 7.5 mg/0.6 mL, and 10.0 mg/0.8 mL Sterile 2.5 mg/0.5 mL (5 mg/mL) 5.0 mg/0.4 mL (12.5 mg/mL) 7.5 mg/0.6 mL (12.5 mg/mL) 10.0 mg/0.8 mL (12.5 mg/mL) Synthetic Antithrombotic DIN Owner: Date of Preparation: Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories Limited July 20, 2012 Bachupally – 500 090 INDIA Date of Revision: November 3, 2014 Canadian Importer/Distributor: Innomar Strategies Inc. 3470 Superior Court- Oakville, Ontario L6L 0C4 CANADA Submission Control Number: 174569 1 Table of Contents PART I: HEALTH PROFESSIONAL INFORMATION .........................................................3 SUMMARY PRODUCT INFORMATION........................................................................3 INDICATIONS AND CLINICAL USE..............................................................................3 CONTRAINDICATIONS...................................................................................................4 WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS..................................................................................4 ADVERSE REACTIONS....................................................................................................9 DRUG INTERACTIONS..................................................................................................22 DOSAGE AND ADMINISTRATION..............................................................................23 OVERDOSAGE................................................................................................................27
    [Show full text]
  • DOACS COMPARISON and Faqs
    NOACS/DOACS*: PRACTICAL ISSUES AND FREQUENTLY-ASKED QUESTIONS OBJECTIVES: • To summarize characteristics of the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) currently available in Canada. • To address common practical issues related to DOAC use. • To address frequently asked questions regarding DOACs. BACKGROUND: The DOACs, which consist of apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban are used for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF). Practical advantages of DOACs over warfarin include fixed once- or twice-daily oral dosing without the need for coagulation test monitoring, relatively fewer known drug interactions and no known food interactions. Like warfarin, DOACs increase the risk for bleeding and should be administered under close clinical monitoring. Practical issues regarding the everyday use of DOACs will be addressed in this guide. PRACTICAL AND LIFESTYLE ISSUES: Can DOACs be taken with meals? Rivaroxaban should be taken with meals to enhance absorption; the tablet can be crushed and taken with soft foods such as applesauce. Apixaban, dabigatran, edoxaban can be taken with or without meals. However, taking dabigatran with meals can reduce dyspepsia. Dabigatran capsules should not be opened, broken or chewed before swallowing. Are there any foods or beverages that need to be avoided with DOACs? Unlike with warfarin, there are no known food interactions with DOACs, so there are no food restrictions when taking these medications. In addition, there is no evidence that drinking grapefruit juice affects the effectiveness or safety of DOACs. In general, it is acceptable for patients taking a DOAC to drink alcoholic beverages in moderation (e.g. a glass of wine with a meal) as it is for patients on warfarin.
    [Show full text]
  • Rtpa) for the Treatment of Hepatic Veno-Occlusive Disease (VOD
    Bone Marrow Transplantation, (1999) 23, 803–807 1999 Stockton Press All rights reserved 0268–3369/99 $12.00 http://www.stockton-press.co.uk/bmt Recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rtPA) for the treatment of hepatic veno-occlusive disease (VOD) S Kulkarni1, M Rodriguez2, A Lafuente2, P Mateos2, J Mehta1, S Singhal1, R Saso3, D Tait4, JG Treleaven3 and RL Powles1 Departments of 1Medical Oncology, 3Haematology and 4Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Sutton, Surrey, UK; and 2Haematology Department, Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain Summary: clinical syndrome characterized by hyperbilirubinemia, hepatomegaly and fluid retention,2,3 and results from dam- Seventeen patients who developed hepatic veno-occlus- age to structures in zone 3 of the liver acinus.4 In patients ive disease (VOD) following hematopoietic stem cell who have undergone hematopoietic stem cell transplan- transplantation were treated with recombinant tissue tation, chemoradiotherapy-induced endothelial cell damage plasminogen activator (rtPA) with or without heparin. is likely to be responsible for the pathogenesis of vessel rtPA was started a median of 13 days post transplant obstruction.5 (range 4–35). All patients received rtPA at a dose of 10 Treatment of established VOD has primarily been sup- mg/day as a starting dose, and 12 patients also received portive and any specific measures have resulted in little heparin (1500 U bolus; then 100 U/kg/day as a continu- impact on outcome. Based on the available evidence for ous i.v. infusion). The median number of days of rtPA involvement of hemostatic mechanisms and cytokines in therapy was 2.5 (1–12). The median total serum biliru- the pathogenesis of VOD,6–8 anti-thrombotic and anti-cyto- bin level was 116 mmol/l (range 63–194) at the begin- kine agents have been assessed for their role in treatment.
    [Show full text]