General Introduction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

General Introduction Opgedragen aan Lotte, Yenthe en Seppe This work was supported by grants from the Bijzonder Onderzoeks Fonds (BOF), Ghent University, Belgium; the Fund for Scientific Research (FWO) Flanders, Belgium and the Marie Marguérite Delacroix Fund, Belgium. Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences Department Clinical Chemistry, Microbiology and Immunology Laboratory Bacteriology Research Characterization of the vaginal microflora Rita Verhelst Promotors: Prof. Dr. Mario Vaneechoutte Prof. Dr. Marleen Temmerman Dissertation submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor in Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ghent April 2006 PROMOTORS LEDEN VAN DE EXAMENCOMMISSIE Prof. Dr. Mario Vaneechoutte VOORZITTER Prof. Dr. Geert Leroux-Roels Vakgroep Klinische biologie, microbiologie en immunologie Vakgroep Klinische biologie, microbiologie en immunologie Universiteit Gent Universiteit Gent Prof. Dr. Marleen Temmerman Prof. Dr. Geert Claeys Vakgroep Uro-gynaecologie Vakgroep Klinische biologie, microbiologie en immunologie Universiteit Gent Universiteit Gent Prof. Dr. Denis Pierard Departement Microbiologie Academisch Ziekenhuis Vrije Universiteit Brussel Prof. Dr. Koenraad Smets Vakgroep Pediatrie en genetica Universiteit Gent Prof. Dr. Guido Van Ham Departement Microbiolgie Instituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde, Antwerpen Prof. Dr. Gerda Verschraegen Vakgroep Klinische biologie, microbiologie en immunologie Universiteit Gent Dr. Nico Boon Vakgroep Biochemische en microbiële technologie Universiteit Gent Table of contents List of abbreviations ........................................................................................................................................... 11 List of bacterial species....................................................................................................................................... 12 I. General introduction....................................................................................................................................... 13 II. Objectives ....................................................................................................................................................... 15 III. Overview of the literature............................................................................................................................ 17 III.1. The vaginal ecosystem............................................................................................................................. 17 III.2. The normal vaginal microflora ............................................................................................................... 19 III.2.1. Vaginal lactobacilli.......................................................................................................................... 19 III.2.2. Taxonomy of vaginal lactobacilli: major taxonomic changes ......................................................... 19 III.3. Bacterial vaginosis.................................................................................................................................. 21 III.3.1. Definition......................................................................................................................................... 22 III.3.2. Epidemiology .................................................................................................................................. 22 III.3.3. Pathophysiology .............................................................................................................................. 22 III.3.3.1. Hydrogen peroxide production ................................................................................................ 23 III.3.3.2. Change in pH ........................................................................................................................... 24 III.3.3.3. Overgrowth of bacterial vaginosis associated organisms ........................................................ 25 III.3.3.4. Reduction in lactobacilli .......................................................................................................... 25 III.3.4. Clinical features............................................................................................................................... 26 III.3.5. Complications.................................................................................................................................. 26 III.3.6. Diagnosis ......................................................................................................................................... 26 III.3.6.1. Clinical diagnosis by Amsel criteria ........................................................................................ 27 III.3.6.2. Commercial point-of-care tests................................................................................................ 28 III.3.6.2.1. pH measurement .............................................................................................................. 28 III.3.6.2.2. Presence of trimethylamine.............................................................................................. 28 III.3.6.2.3. pH measurement and trimethylamine presence................................................................ 28 III.3.6.2.4. Sialidase activity .............................................................................................................. 28 III.3.6.2.5. Proline aminopeptidase activity ....................................................................................... 29 III.3.6.2.6. DNA probe for G. vaginalis rRNA .................................................................................. 29 III.3.6.3. Microscopy .............................................................................................................................. 29 III.3.6.3.1. Scoring of Gram stained vaginal smears according to Nugent ........................................ 29 III.3.6.3.2. Scoring of Gram stained vaginal smears according to Hay/Ison...................................... 31 III.3.6.3.3. Wet smear criteria ............................................................................................................ 31 III.3.6.4. Conclusion ............................................................................................................................... 32 III.3.7. Treatment......................................................................................................................................... 32 III.4.1. Culture............................................................................................................................................. 35 III.4.1.1. Non-selective culture methods................................................................................................. 35 III.4.1.2. Semi-selective culture methods ............................................................................................... 36 III.4.1.3. Phenotypic identification of cultured microorganisms ............................................................ 37 III.4.1.4. DNA-based identification of cultured microorganisms. .......................................................... 38 III.4.1.4.1. PCR-independent DNA-based identification of cultured organisms................................ 38 III.4.1.4.2. PCR-based identification methods of cultured organisms ............................................... 39 III.4.1.4.3. Principle of tRNA intergenic polymorphism length analysis (tDNA-PCR)..................... 40 III.4.2. DNA-based culture-independent methods....................................................................................... 41 III.4.2.1. Advantages of the molecular microbiologic approach............................................................. 41 III.4.2.2. PCR-independent and culture-independent techniques............................................................ 44 III.4.2.3. PCR-based culture-independent techniques............................................................................. 45 III.4.2.3.1. Principle of cloning.......................................................................................................... 46 III.4.2.3.2. Principle of T-RFLP......................................................................................................... 46 III.4.2.3.3. Species specific PCR........................................................................................................ 49 IV. Experimental work....................................................................................................................................... 51 IV.1. PCR-based identification method of cultured organisms ........................................................................ 53 Baele M, Vaneechoutte M, Verhelst R, Vancanneyt M, Devriese LA, Haesebrouck F. Identification of Lactobacillus species using tDNA-PCR. J Microbiol Methods. 2002 Aug;50(3): 263-71. IV.2. Cloning of 16S rRNA genes of normal and disturbed vaginal microflora............................................... 65 Verhelst R, Verstraelen H, Claeys G, Verschraegen G, Delanghe J, Van Simaey L, De Ganck C, Temmerman M, Vaneechoutte M. Cloning of 16S rRNA genes amplified from normal and disturbed vaginal microflora suggests a strong association between Atopobium vaginae, Gardnerella vaginalis and bacterial vaginosis. BMC Microbiol. 2004 Apr 21;4: 16. IV.3. Characterization of vaginal microflora at three time points in pregnancy by Gram stain, culture
Recommended publications
  • The Significance of Lactobacillus Crispatus and L. Vaginalis for Vaginal Health and the Negative Effect of Recent
    Jespers et al. BMC Infectious Diseases (2015) 15:115 DOI 10.1186/s12879-015-0825-z RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access The significance of Lactobacillus crispatus and L. vaginalis for vaginal health and the negative effect of recent sex: a cross-sectional descriptive study across groups of African women Vicky Jespers1*, Janneke van de Wijgert2, Piet Cools3, Rita Verhelst4, Hans Verstraelen5, Sinead Delany-Moretlwe6, Mary Mwaura7, Gilles F Ndayisaba8, Kishor Mandaliya7, Joris Menten9, Liselotte Hardy1,10, Tania Crucitti10 and for the Vaginal Biomarkers Study Group Abstract Background: Women in sub-Saharan Africa are vulnerable to acquiring HIV infection and reproductive tract infections. Bacterial vaginosis (BV), a disruption of the vaginal microbiota, has been shown to be strongly associated with HIV infection. Risk factors related to potentially protective or harmful microbiota species are not known. Methods: We present cross-sectional quantitative polymerase chain reaction data of the Lactobacillus genus, five Lactobacillus species, and three BV-related bacteria (Gardnerella vaginalis, Atopobium vaginae,andPrevotella bivia) together with Escherichia coli and Candida albicans in 426 African women across different groups at risk for HIV. We selected a reference group of adult HIV-negative women at average risk for HIV acquisition and compared species variations in subgroups of adolescents, HIV-negative pregnant women, women engaging in traditional vaginal practices, sex workers and a group of HIV-positive women on combination antiretroviral therapy. We explored the associations between presence and quantity of the bacteria with BV by Nugent score, in relation to several factors of known or theoretical importance. Results: The presence of species across Kenyan, South African and Rwandan women was remarkably similar and few differences were seen between the two groups of reference women in Kenya and South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • The Histidine Decarboxylase Gene Cluster of Lactobacillus Parabuchneri Was Gained by Horizontal Gene Transfer and Is Mobile Within the Species
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 17 February 2017 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00218 The Histidine Decarboxylase Gene Cluster of Lactobacillus parabuchneri Was Gained by Horizontal Gene Transfer and Is Mobile within the Species Daniel Wüthrich 1, Hélène Berthoud 2, Daniel Wechsler 2, Elisabeth Eugster 2, Stefan Irmler 2 and Rémy Bruggmann 1* 1 Interfaculty Bioinformatics Unit and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland, 2 Agroscope, Institute for Food Sciences, Bern, Switzerland Histamine in food can cause intolerance reactions in consumers. Lactobacillus parabuchneri (L. parabuchneri) is one of the major causes of elevated histamine levels in cheese. Despite its significant economic impact and negative influence on human health, no genomic study has been published so far. We sequenced and Edited by: analyzed 18 L. parabuchneri strains of which 12 were histamine positive and 6 were Danilo Ercolini, histamine negative. We determined the complete genome of the histamine positive strain University of Naples Federico II, Italy FAM21731 with PacBio as well as Illumina and the genomes of the remaining 17 strains Reviewed by: using the Illumina technology. We developed the synteny aware ortholog finding algorithm Patrick Lucas, University of Bordeaux 1, France SynOrf to compare the genomes and we show that the histidine decarboxylase (HDC) Daniel M. Linares, gene cluster is located in a genomic island. It is very likely that the HDC gene cluster Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority, Ireland was transferred from other lactobacilli, as it is highly conserved within several lactobacilli *Correspondence: species. Furthermore, we have evidence that the HDC gene cluster was transferred within Rémy Bruggmann the L.
    [Show full text]
  • A Taxonomic Note on the Genus Lactobacillus
    Taxonomic Description template 1 A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: 2 Description of 23 novel genera, emended description 3 of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union 4 of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae 5 Jinshui Zheng1, $, Stijn Wittouck2, $, Elisa Salvetti3, $, Charles M.A.P. Franz4, Hugh M.B. Harris5, Paola 6 Mattarelli6, Paul W. O’Toole5, Bruno Pot7, Peter Vandamme8, Jens Walter9, 10, Koichi Watanabe11, 12, 7 Sander Wuyts2, Giovanna E. Felis3, #*, Michael G. Gänzle9, 13#*, Sarah Lebeer2 # 8 '© [Jinshui Zheng, Stijn Wittouck, Elisa Salvetti, Charles M.A.P. Franz, Hugh M.B. Harris, Paola 9 Mattarelli, Paul W. O’Toole, Bruno Pot, Peter Vandamme, Jens Walter, Koichi Watanabe, Sander 10 Wuyts, Giovanna E. Felis, Michael G. Gänzle, Sarah Lebeer]. 11 The definitive peer reviewed, edited version of this article is published in International Journal of 12 Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004107 13 1Huazhong Agricultural University, State Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Hubei Key 14 Laboratory of Agricultural Bioinformatics, Wuhan, Hubei, P.R. China. 15 2Research Group Environmental Ecology and Applied Microbiology, Department of Bioscience 16 Engineering, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium 17 3 Dept. of Biotechnology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy 18 4 Max Rubner‐Institut, Department of Microbiology and Biotechnology, Kiel, Germany 19 5 School of Microbiology & APC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Co. Cork, Ireland 20 6 University of Bologna, Dept. of Agricultural and Food Sciences, Bologna, Italy 21 7 Research Group of Industrial Microbiology and Food Biotechnology (IMDO), Vrije Universiteit 22 Brussel, Brussels, Belgium 23 8 Laboratory of Microbiology, Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Ghent University, Ghent, 24 Belgium 25 9 Department of Agricultural, Food & Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada 26 10 Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada 27 11 National Taiwan University, Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Prevalence of Urinary Tract Infection and Antibiotic Resistance Pattern in Pregnant Women, Najran Region, Saudi Arabia
    Vol. 13(26), pp. 407-413, August, 2019 DOI: 10.5897/AJMR2019.9084 Article Number: E3F64FA61643 ISSN: 1996-0808 Copyright ©2019 Author(s) retain the copyright of this article African Journal of Microbiology Research http://www.academicjournals.org/AJMR Full Length Research Paper Prevalence of urinary tract infection and antibiotic resistance pattern in pregnant women, Najran region, Saudi Arabia Ali Mohamed Alshabi1*, Majed Saeed Alshahrani2, Saad Ahmed Alkahtani1 and Mohammad Shabib Akhtar1 1Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia. 2Department of Obstetics and Gyneocology, Faculty of Medicine, Najran University, Najran, Saudi Arabia. Received 25 February, 2019; Accepted August 5, 2019 Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) is one of the commonest infectious disease in pregnancy, and in pregnancy we have very limited number of antibiotics to treat the UTI. This study was conducted on 151 patients who attended the gynecology clinic during the study period. Nineteen UTI proven cases of UTI were studied for prevalence of microorganism and sensitivity pattern against different antibiotics. Among the bacteria isolated, Escherichia coli (73.68%) and Staphylococcus aureus (10.52%) were the most prevalent Gram negative and Gram positive bacteria respectively. To know the resistance pattern of microorganism we used commercially available discs of different antibiotics. Gram negative bacteria showed more resistance as compared to Gram positive one. It is observed that the most effective antibiotic for Gram negative isolates is Ceftriaxone (87.5%), followed by Amoxicillin + Clavulanic acid (81.25%), Amikacin (75%), Cefuroxime (75%), Cefixime (68.75%) and Mezlocillin (62.5%). For the Gram positive bacteria, Ceftriaxone, Amikacin and Amoxicillin + Clavulanic acid were the most effective antimicrobials (100%).
    [Show full text]
  • Antimicrobial Activity and Antibiotic Resistance of Lactobacillus Delbrueckii Ssp
    African Journal of Microbiology Research Vol. 5(6) pp. 675-682, 18 March, 2011 Available online http://www.academicjournals.org/ajmr DOI: 10.5897/AJMR10.835 ISSN 1996-0808 ©2011 Academic Journals Full Length Research Paper Antimicrobial activity and antibiotic resistance of Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus strains isolated from Turkish homemade yoghurts Asli Akpinar, Oktay Yerlikaya* and Sevda Kiliç Department of Dairy Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ege University, 35100, Bornova – zmir, Turkey. Accepted 1 March, 2011 The aim of this study was to determine the inhibitive effect of 25 Lactobacillus delbruecki ssp. bulgaricus and 16 Streptococcus thermophilus strains isolated from 30 different homemade yoghurts on several pathogen and contaminant bacteria. The antibiotic resistance of these bacteria was also determined. All of Lactobacillus bulgaricus strains exhibited antimicrobial activity against Escherichia coli, whereas all of S. thermophilus strains exhibited the same activity against Klebsiella pneumoniae. None of L. bulgaricus strains were resistant to the polymixin-B, only the OL4 strain has shown resistance to bacitracin. While some strains of S. thermophilus like C6 and SL4 exhibited resistance to novobiocin, SY72, M3, C1M, and F1M were shown to optochin. ET6 and SY73 strains were found to be resistant in both novobiocin and optochin. Key words: Antibiotic resistance, antimicrobial activity, homemade yoghurt, lactic acid bacteria, Lactobacillus delbrueckii ssp. bulgaricus, Streptococcus thermophilus. INTRODUCTION Generally, yoghurt is being perceived as a kind of healthy properties and they have a long history of safe use as food which has a low fat and essential value in terms of starter culture bacteria (Katla et al., 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2018/064165 A2 (.Pdf)
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2018/064165 A2 05 April 2018 (05.04.2018) W !P O PCT (51) International Patent Classification: Published: A61K 35/74 (20 15.0 1) C12N 1/21 (2006 .01) — without international search report and to be republished (21) International Application Number: upon receipt of that report (Rule 48.2(g)) PCT/US2017/053717 — with sequence listing part of description (Rule 5.2(a)) (22) International Filing Date: 27 September 2017 (27.09.2017) (25) Filing Language: English (26) Publication Langi English (30) Priority Data: 62/400,372 27 September 2016 (27.09.2016) US 62/508,885 19 May 2017 (19.05.2017) US 62/557,566 12 September 2017 (12.09.2017) US (71) Applicant: BOARD OF REGENTS, THE UNIVERSI¬ TY OF TEXAS SYSTEM [US/US]; 210 West 7th St., Austin, TX 78701 (US). (72) Inventors: WARGO, Jennifer; 1814 Bissonnet St., Hous ton, TX 77005 (US). GOPALAKRISHNAN, Vanch- eswaran; 7900 Cambridge, Apt. 10-lb, Houston, TX 77054 (US). (74) Agent: BYRD, Marshall, P.; Parker Highlander PLLC, 1120 S. Capital Of Texas Highway, Bldg. One, Suite 200, Austin, TX 78746 (US). (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DJ, DK, DM, DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JO, JP, KE, KG, KH, KN, KP, KR, KW, KZ, LA, LC, LK, LR, LS, LU, LY, MA, MD, ME, MG, MK, MN, MW, MX, MY, MZ, NA, NG, NI, NO, NZ, OM, PA, PE, PG, PH, PL, PT, QA, RO, RS, RU, RW, SA, SC, SD, SE, SG, SK, SL, SM, ST, SV, SY, TH, TJ, TM, TN, TR, TT, TZ, UA, UG, US, UZ, VC, VN, ZA, ZM, ZW.
    [Show full text]
  • Bacterial Communities in Women with Bacterial Vaginosis: High Resolution Phylogenetic Analyses Reveal Relationships of Microbiota to Clinical Criteria
    Bacterial Communities in Women with Bacterial Vaginosis: High Resolution Phylogenetic Analyses Reveal Relationships of Microbiota to Clinical Criteria Sujatha Srinivasan1*, Noah G. Hoffman2, Martin T. Morgan3, Frederick A. Matsen3, Tina L. Fiedler1, Robert W. Hall4, Frederick J. Ross3, Connor O. McCoy3, Roger Bumgarner4, Jeanne M. Marrazzo5, David N. Fredricks1,4,5* 1 Vaccine & Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America, 2 Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America, 3 Public Health Science Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America, 4 Department of Microbiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America, 5 Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, United States of America Abstract Background: Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is a common condition that is associated with numerous adverse health outcomes and is characterized by poorly understood changes in the vaginal microbiota. We sought to describe the composition and diversity of the vaginal bacterial biota in women with BV using deep sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene coupled with species-level taxonomic identification. We investigated the associations between the presence of individual bacterial species and clinical diagnostic characteristics of BV. Methodology/Principal Findings: Broad-range 16S rRNA gene PCR and pyrosequencing were performed on vaginal swabs from 220 women with and without BV. BV was assessed by Amsel’s clinical criteria and confirmed by Gram stain. Taxonomic classification was performed using phylogenetic placement tools that assigned 99% of query sequence reads to the species level. Women with BV had heterogeneous vaginal bacterial communities that were usually not dominated by a single taxon.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Composition of Lactobacilli in Humans
    Note Bioscience Microflora Vol. 29 (1), 47–50, 2010 Analysis of the Composition of Lactobacilli in Humans Katsunori KIMURA1*, Tomoko NISHIO1, Chinami MIZOGUCHi1 and Akiko KOIZUMI1 1Division of Research and Development, Meiji Dairies Corporation, 540 Naruda, Odawara, Kanagawa 250-0862, Japan Received July 19, 2009; Accepted August 31, 2009 We collected fecal samples twice from 8 subjects and obtained 160 isolates of lactobacilli. The isolates were genetically fingerprinted and identified by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and 16S rDNA sequence analysis, respectively. The numbers of lactobacilli detected in fecal samples varied greatly among the subjects. The isolates were divided into 37 strains by PFGE. No common strain was detected in the feces of different subjects. Except for one subject, at least one strain, unique to each individual, was detected in both fecal samples. The strains detected in both fecal samples were identified as Lactobacillus amylovorus, L. gasseri, L. fermentum, L. delbrueckii, L. crispatus, L. vaginalis and L. ruminis. They may be the indigenous Lactobacillus species in Japanese adults. Key words: lactobacilli; Lactobacillus; composition; identification; PFGE Members of the genus Lactobacillus are gram-positive was used to make a fecal homogenate in 9 ml of organisms that belong to the general category of lactic Trypticase soy broth without dextrose (BBL, acid bacteria. They inhabit a wide variety of habitats, Cockeysville, MD). A dilution series (10–1 to 10–7) was including foods, plants and the gastrointestinal tracts of made in the same medium, and 100-l aliquots of each humans and animals. Some Lactobacillus strains are dilution were spread on Rogosa SL agar (Difco, Sparks, used in the manufacture of fermented foods.
    [Show full text]
  • Use of the Diagnostic Bacteriology Laboratory: a Practical Review for the Clinician
    148 Postgrad Med J 2001;77:148–156 REVIEWS Postgrad Med J: first published as 10.1136/pmj.77.905.148 on 1 March 2001. Downloaded from Use of the diagnostic bacteriology laboratory: a practical review for the clinician W J Steinbach, A K Shetty Lucile Salter Packard Children’s Hospital at EVective utilisation and understanding of the Stanford, Stanford Box 1: Gram stain technique University School of clinical bacteriology laboratory can greatly aid Medicine, 725 Welch in the diagnosis of infectious diseases. Al- (1) Air dry specimen and fix with Road, Palo Alto, though described more than a century ago, the methanol or heat. California, USA 94304, Gram stain remains the most frequently used (2) Add crystal violet stain. USA rapid diagnostic test, and in conjunction with W J Steinbach various biochemical tests is the cornerstone of (3) Rinse with water to wash unbound A K Shetty the clinical laboratory. First described by Dan- dye, add mordant (for example, iodine: 12 potassium iodide). Correspondence to: ish pathologist Christian Gram in 1884 and Dr Steinbach later slightly modified, the Gram stain easily (4) After waiting 30–60 seconds, rinse with [email protected] divides bacteria into two groups, Gram positive water. Submitted 27 March 2000 and Gram negative, on the basis of their cell (5) Add decolorising solvent (ethanol or Accepted 5 June 2000 wall and cell membrane permeability to acetone) to remove unbound dye. Growth on artificial medium Obligate intracellular (6) Counterstain with safranin. Chlamydia Legionella Gram positive bacteria stain blue Coxiella Ehrlichia Rickettsia (retained crystal violet).
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Bacteriology
    LECTURE NOTES Degree and Diploma Programs For Environmental Health Students Medical Bacteriology Abilo Tadesse, Meseret Alem University of Gondar In collaboration with the Ethiopia Public Health Training Initiative, The Carter Center, the Ethiopia Ministry of Health, and the Ethiopia Ministry of Education September 2006 Funded under USAID Cooperative Agreement No. 663-A-00-00-0358-00. Produced in collaboration with the Ethiopia Public Health Training Initiative, The Carter Center, the Ethiopia Ministry of Health, and the Ethiopia Ministry of Education. Important Guidelines for Printing and Photocopying Limited permission is granted free of charge to print or photocopy all pages of this publication for educational, not-for-profit use by health care workers, students or faculty. All copies must retain all author credits and copyright notices included in the original document. Under no circumstances is it permissible to sell or distribute on a commercial basis, or to claim authorship of, copies of material reproduced from this publication. ©2006 by Abilo Tadesse, Meseret Alem All rights reserved. Except as expressly provided above, no part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without written permission of the author or authors. This material is intended for educational use only by practicing health care workers or students and faculty in a health care field. PREFACE Text book on Medical Bacteriology for Medical Laboratory Technology students are not available as need, so this lecture note will alleviate the acute shortage of text books and reference materials on medical bacteriology.
    [Show full text]
  • MALDI‑TOF MS‑Based Direct‑On‑Target Microdroplet Growth Assay: Latest Developments
    EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE 20: 2555-2556, 2020 COMMENT MALDI‑TOF MS‑based direct‑on‑target microdroplet growth assay: Latest developments IOANNIS K. NEONAKIS1 and DEMETRIOS A. SPANDIDOS2 1Department of Clinical Microbiology and Microbial Pathogenesis, University Hospital of Heraklion, 71201 Heraklion; 2Laboratory of Clinical Virology, School of Medicine, University of Crete, 71003 Heraklion, Greece Received June 19, 2020; Accepted July 8, 2020 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2020.8976 Abstract. The matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization in each droplet spot is known, the MIC can be evaluated and time‑of‑flight mass spectrometry direct‑on‑target microdro- the microorganism can be characterized as susceptible or not. plet growth assay for the rapid susceptibility testing and the With this assay and using a panel of different antibiotics, not detection of the underlying antibiotic resistance mechanisms only can the susceptibility status of an isolate be determined of microbia has been recently introduced. In the present study, but also the underlining resistance mechanisms be revealed. we review the latest developments in the field. In the initial reports, the assay was used for the detection of Recently, the matrix‑assisted laser desorption‑ionization carbapenem nonsusceptibility in Gram‑negative pathogens time‑of‑flight mass spectrometry (MALDI‑TOF MS) both from colonies (1) and directly from positive blood cultures direct‑on‑target microdroplet growth assay (DOT‑MGA) for (BCs) (2). The assay was also used for the detection of two the rapid susceptibility testing and the detection of the under- additional resistance mechanisms among Enterobacterales, lying antibiotic resistance mechanisms of microbia has been namely the extended‑spectrum β‑lactamase (ESBL) produc- introduced (1‑3).
    [Show full text]
  • A Taxonomic Note on the Genus Lactobacillus
    TAXONOMIC DESCRIPTION Zheng et al., Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. DOI 10.1099/ijsem.0.004107 A taxonomic note on the genus Lactobacillus: Description of 23 novel genera, emended description of the genus Lactobacillus Beijerinck 1901, and union of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae Jinshui Zheng1†, Stijn Wittouck2†, Elisa Salvetti3†, Charles M.A.P. Franz4, Hugh M.B. Harris5, Paola Mattarelli6, Paul W. O’Toole5, Bruno Pot7, Peter Vandamme8, Jens Walter9,10, Koichi Watanabe11,12, Sander Wuyts2, Giovanna E. Felis3,*,†, Michael G. Gänzle9,13,*,† and Sarah Lebeer2† Abstract The genus Lactobacillus comprises 261 species (at March 2020) that are extremely diverse at phenotypic, ecological and gen- otypic levels. This study evaluated the taxonomy of Lactobacillaceae and Leuconostocaceae on the basis of whole genome sequences. Parameters that were evaluated included core genome phylogeny, (conserved) pairwise average amino acid identity, clade- specific signature genes, physiological criteria and the ecology of the organisms. Based on this polyphasic approach, we propose reclassification of the genus Lactobacillus into 25 genera including the emended genus Lactobacillus, which includes host- adapted organisms that have been referred to as the Lactobacillus delbrueckii group, Paralactobacillus and 23 novel genera for which the names Holzapfelia, Amylolactobacillus, Bombilactobacillus, Companilactobacillus, Lapidilactobacillus, Agrilactobacil- lus, Schleiferilactobacillus, Loigolactobacilus, Lacticaseibacillus, Latilactobacillus, Dellaglioa,
    [Show full text]