Watering Street Trees in Santa Monica

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Watering Street Trees in Santa Monica Watering Street Trees in Santa Monica Watering trees is extremely important to their growth, health and ability to produce the important environmental benefits that we as a community rely on. However, like anything else, too much of a good thing can be detrimental. By following some basic guidelines you can have healthy street trees and conserve water at the same time. FUNDAMENTALS OF WATERING STREET TREES The species, age of tree and type of soil have a bearing on how much to water. o Some types of soil hold water longer than other types. o Some types of soil dry out quicker than other types. o Watering young trees is different from watering mature trees. o Some species do not require as much water as others might regardless of age. See Attachment 1 for a list of watering needs of individual species. To find out what species your street tree is contact the Community Forester at [email protected]. o The seasons and weather conditions influence when to water. Checking soil moisture content throughout the year will tell when a tree needs water. o Surface grade dictates how fast the soil can take the water. Apply too much at once or too often and you get surface runoff or puddles. KNOW THE TYPE OF SOIL It is important that sprinkler systems are properly designed and maintained so they apply water at a rate low enough to allow all it to infiltrate into the soil without running off or creating puddles somewhere it’s not supposed to. The rate at which soil can absorb or take in water is the infiltration rate. The rate at which a sprinkler system applies water is called the application rate. If the application rate is higher than the soil's infiltration rate surface runoff is achieved, resulting in water collecting on the surface and/or flowing away from where it was supposed to go. This wastes water as it doesn’t provide the tree with the water it needs. This condition can be offset by applying repeating shorter water cycles that gives to sol time to absorb the moisture in between cycles. The irrigation system shown in the photo at left shows a front yard landscape with a steep grade down to the sidewalk. The system has been running long enough to pass the point of runoff and the water applied from this point forward is wasted. To avoid this problem the system should be set with short cycles and long intervals in between each cycle. This allows the soil to absorb the water as it is applied. In order to have an idea of the infiltration rate it helps to know the type of soil. A general rule to follow when applying irrigation is: sandy soil requires water on a more frequent basis and clay soils require less water on an infrequent basis. An easy way to determine the type of soil: Dig down about four inches and take a sample of moist soil about the size of a marble. o If it can be rolled up into a tube thinner than a pencil and hold its shape, then its clay soil. o If the soil breaks apart easily and has a consistent, gritty texture, it is sandy soil. o If the soil contains a lot of organic matter of varying size and consistency, it is loam. Loamy soil can also vary from clay loam or sandy loam. Loamy soil that is easy to break apart into small particles is sandy loam. Loamy soil that breaks apart into large chunky particles is clay loam. Soil with the right amount of water should be moist but not saturated. A simple test to check moisture content is to take a handful of soil and squeeze it tightly then release the pressure. If the soil retains its shape and is not sticky or oozing water, the moisture content is favorable. Another consideration is the seasonal changes in weather. During spring and fall, the days are shorter and cooler and the soil temperature drops, and trees need less water. As the days get longer and warmer, trees need more water. As the seasons change, the frequency of watering needs to be adjusted accordingly. This is usually done by reducing the number of days between each time you need to water and reducing the amount that is actually applied to the soil. If no adjustments are made throughout the seasons, over- watering or under-watering occurs, which in turns leads to poor tree health. GUIDELINES FOR WATERING STREET TREES Check the Community Forester’s list of water requirements for street trees to get an idea of how much water your street tree needs. (Attachment 1) Key factors to remember when watering street trees: o Species There are over 225 different species of trees in Santa Monica and many of them require different amounts of water at different times of the year. Santa Monica’s forest is primarily made up of trees that flourish in a moderate climate with naturally dry conditions. Many species found in Santa Monica do not require regular water and actually thrive when they receive minimal amounts. Other species require no irrigation during the summer months as it is detrimental to their health. Mature or established trees usually can get by with infrequent watering depending on the species of tree. Most of Santa Monica’s street trees require a climate with long, hot summers and mild winters with a moderate amount of rainfall. They do best in sandy loam soil but can tolerate other types of soils. The most important area to water for deciduous trees is within the dripline (from the trunk to the outer edges of the trees branches). For evergreens, water 3-5 feet beyond the dripline on all sides of the tree. o Current age and size Older trees are sensitive to increased amounts of water. Trees that have been thriving on a certain level of soil moisture and then subjected to increased amounts can respond in different ways. Increased shoot growth adds new foliage and weight to the limbs in the canopy and increases pruning requirements. In order to reduce the potential for limb failures pruning cycles need to be increased. Too much water can also kill roots from lack of oxygen in the soil. Mature trees that suffer from too much water in the soil will respond with dead tips, dieback throughout the canopy and excessive leaf drop. In extreme cases, trees with dead roots can fall over. The tree in the photo at right is a mature drought tolerant tree that has a sparse canopy and chlorotic foliage because of regular watering. This is evident by the dieback in the tips of the tree seen in the photo at left. The photo at right shows the trunk base clear of turf. This helps prevent damage to the trunk from water, lawn mowers or line trimmers and maintains a strong healthy trunk base. Water on the trunk can lead to decay if there are wounds at the base of the tree. This eventually weakens the trunk and creates a potential for total tree failure. Water on the trunk creates conditions for decay to progress when there are wounds at the base of the tree. There are several fungal diseases known to afflict trees that thrive in of southern California’s climate. The diseases that infect these trees can cause considerable damage and even the demise of a street tree. These problems mainly arise due to conditions that are different from their native habitat. Conditions such as summer watering or excessive watering in the winter result in fungi, bacteria and viruses in the soil that trees cannot withstand or compete with. This condition can ultimately lead to the failure of a mature tree in spite of a healthy appearing canopy. The photo at right and below show the fruiting bodies of two fungi that are commonly associated with trees that have been wounded and suffer from internal decay. Improper or excessive watering at the base of a tree creates conditions for these fungi to grow and accelerate the decay process. When trees display these fruiting bodies it is an indication of extensive internal decay. Report a tree with fruiting bodies of fungi. [email protected] The main thing that new trees need to become established is a source of moisture. Regular moisture allows a new tree to grow quickly by developing a consistent amount of foliage and shoot growth, while irregular watering forces the tree to only produce the foliage that it can sustain on minimal or infrequent amounts of moisture. o Young trees that have been recently planted in the ground need approximately 10 gallons of water every two weeks. o A simple method to follow is to fill up the swale (shown in the photo below left) around the trunk base with water and let it percolate down into the root ball. After it has all drained into the soil, fill the swale up once more and allow it to drain. Follow this method twice a week during warm months of May through October and once a week during the cool months of November through April. When watering trees it helps to understand the following facts about roots. o A tree’s root mass is its foundation and provides the structural support it needs to remain standing upright. Over watering leads to damage to that foundation and can affect the stability of a street tree. o Most if not all of a street tree’s roots are found in the upper 2 feet of soil.
Recommended publications
  • Regeneration Mechanisms in Swamp Paperbark (Melaleuca Ericifolia Sm.) and Their Implications for Wetland Rehabilitation
    Regeneration mechanisms in Swamp Paperbark (Melaleuca ericifolia Sm.) and their implications for wetland rehabilitation Randall Robinson School of Biomedical Sciences Institute of Sustainability and Innovation Victoria University St Albans Victoria Australia June 2007 Declaration I, Randall William Robinson, declare that the PhD thesis entitled Regeneration mechanisms in Swamp Paperbark (Melaleuca ericifolia Sm.) and their implications for wetland rehabilitation is no more than 100,000 words in length including quotes and exclusive of tables, figures, appendices, bibliography, references and footnotes. This thesis contains no material that has been submitted previously, in whole or in part, for the award of any other academic degree or diploma. Except where otherwise indicated, this thesis is my own work Randall William Robinson 28 August 2007 II Table of Contents Summary 1 1.0 Introduction 4 1.1 General ecological background to the project 7 1.1.1 Melaleuca 7 1.1.2 Adaptations to soils and climate 9 1.1.3 Vegetative growth 10 1.1.4 Genetic diversity 12 1.1.5 Sexual reproduction 15 1.1.6 Rehabilitation approaches 17 1.2 Aims of this project 18 2.0 The study site 21 2.1 Introduction 21 2.2 History of Dowd Morass 23 2.2.1 Water levels over past ∼ three decades 26 2.2.2 Salinity regimes over past ∼ three decades 29 2.3 Water quality in Dowd Morass 30 2.3.1 31 2.4 Sediment quality in Dowd Morass 34 III 2.4.1 Carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus contents 34 2.4.2 Soil salinity 35 2.4.3 Soil pH and the presence of acid-sulfate soils 36 2.4.4 Heavy
    [Show full text]
  • Their Botany, Essential Oils and Uses 6.86 MB
    MELALEUCAS THEIR BOTANY, ESSENTIAL OILS AND USES Joseph J. Brophy, Lyndley A. Craven and John C. Doran MELALEUCAS THEIR BOTANY, ESSENTIAL OILS AND USES Joseph J. Brophy School of Chemistry, University of New South Wales Lyndley A. Craven Australian National Herbarium, CSIRO Plant Industry John C. Doran Australian Tree Seed Centre, CSIRO Plant Industry 2013 The Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) was established in June 1982 by an Act of the Australian Parliament. ACIAR operates as part of Australia's international development cooperation program, with a mission to achieve more productive and sustainable agricultural systems, for the benefit of developing countries and Australia. It commissions collaborative research between Australian and developing-country researchers in areas where Australia has special research competence. It also administers Australia's contribution to the International Agricultural Research Centres. Where trade names are used this constitutes neither endorsement of nor discrimination against any product by ACIAR. ACIAR MONOGRAPH SERIES This series contains the results of original research supported by ACIAR, or material deemed relevant to ACIAR’s research and development objectives. The series is distributed internationally, with an emphasis on developing countries. © Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research (ACIAR) 2013 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission from ACIAR, GPO Box 1571, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia, [email protected] Brophy J.J., Craven L.A. and Doran J.C. 2013. Melaleucas: their botany, essential oils and uses. ACIAR Monograph No. 156. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research: Canberra.
    [Show full text]
  • Jervis Bay Territory Page 1 of 50 21-Jan-11 Species List for NRM Region (Blank), Jervis Bay Territory
    Biodiversity Summary for NRM Regions Species List What is the summary for and where does it come from? This list has been produced by the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (SEWPC) for the Natural Resource Management Spatial Information System. The list was produced using the AustralianAustralian Natural Natural Heritage Heritage Assessment Assessment Tool Tool (ANHAT), which analyses data from a range of plant and animal surveys and collections from across Australia to automatically generate a report for each NRM region. Data sources (Appendix 2) include national and state herbaria, museums, state governments, CSIRO, Birds Australia and a range of surveys conducted by or for DEWHA. For each family of plant and animal covered by ANHAT (Appendix 1), this document gives the number of species in the country and how many of them are found in the region. It also identifies species listed as Vulnerable, Critically Endangered, Endangered or Conservation Dependent under the EPBC Act. A biodiversity summary for this region is also available. For more information please see: www.environment.gov.au/heritage/anhat/index.html Limitations • ANHAT currently contains information on the distribution of over 30,000 Australian taxa. This includes all mammals, birds, reptiles, frogs and fish, 137 families of vascular plants (over 15,000 species) and a range of invertebrate groups. Groups notnot yet yet covered covered in inANHAT ANHAT are notnot included included in in the the list. list. • The data used come from authoritative sources, but they are not perfect. All species names have been confirmed as valid species names, but it is not possible to confirm all species locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Expressway Master Plant List
    MASTER PLANT LIST GENERAL INTRODUCTION TO PLANT LISTS Plants are living organisms. They possess variety in form, foliage and flower color, visual texture and ultimate size. There is variation in plants of the same species. Plants change: with seasons, with time and with the environment. Yet here is an attempt to categorize and catalogue a group of plants well suited for highway and expressway planting in Santa Clara County. This is possible because in all the existing variety of plants, there still remains a visual, morphological and taxonomical distinction among them. The following lists and identification cards emphasize these distinctions. 1 of 6 MASTER PLANT LIST TREES Acacia decurrens: Green wattle Acacia longifolia: Sydney golden wattle Acacia melanoxylon: Blackwood acacia Acer macrophyllum: Bigleaf maple Aesculus californica: California buckeye Aesculus carnea: Red horsechestnut Ailanthus altissima: Tree-of-heaven Albizia julibrissin: Silk tree Alnus cordata: Italian alder Alnus rhombifolia: White alder Arbutus menziesii: Madrone Calocedrus decurrens: Incense cedar Casuarina equisetifolia: Horsetail tree Casuarina stricta: Coast beefwood Catalpa speciosa: Western catalpa Cedrus deodara: Deodar cedar Ceratonia siliqua: Carob Cinnamomum camphora: Camphor Cordyline australis: Australian dracena Crataegus phaenopyrum: Washington thorn Cryptomeria japonica: Japanese redwood Cupressus glabra: Arizona cypress Cupressus macrocarpa: Monterey cypress Eriobotrya japonica: Loquat Eucalyptus camaldulensis: Red gum Eucalyptus citriodora: Lemon-scented
    [Show full text]
  • The Island Rule and Its Application to Multiple Plant Traits
    The island rule and its application to multiple plant traits Annemieke Lona Hedi Hendriks A thesis submitted to the Victoria University of Wellington in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Ecology and Biodiversity Victoria University of Wellington, New Zealand 2019 ii “The larger the island of knowledge, the longer the shoreline of wonder” Ralph W. Sockman. iii iv General Abstract Aim The Island Rule refers to a continuum of body size changes where large mainland species evolve to become smaller and small species evolve to become larger on islands. Previous work focuses almost solely on animals, with virtually no previous tests of its predictions on plants. I tested for (1) reduced floral size diversity on islands, a logical corollary of the island rule and (2) evidence of the Island Rule in plant stature, leaf size and petiole length. Location Small islands surrounding New Zealand; Antipodes, Auckland, Bounty, Campbell, Chatham, Kermadec, Lord Howe, Macquarie, Norfolk, Snares, Stewart and the Three Kings. Methods I compared the morphology of 65 island endemics and their closest ‘mainland’ relative. Species pairs were identified. Differences between archipelagos located at various latitudes were also assessed. Results Floral sizes were reduced on islands relative to the ‘mainland’, consistent with predictions of the Island Rule. Plant stature, leaf size and petiole length conformed to the Island Rule, with smaller plants increasing in size, and larger plants decreasing in size. Main conclusions Results indicate that the conceptual umbrella of the Island Rule can be expanded to plants, accelerating understanding of how plant traits evolve on isolated islands.
    [Show full text]
  • Swamp Sclerophyll Forest on Coastal Floodplains
    Where fire has been excluded for long periods in Swamp Sclerophyll Forest, it may contain many species typical of the EEC, Littoral Rainforest, and on the NSW North Coast where substrates are volcanically derived it may adjoin with the EEC, Swamp Sclerophyll Forest Lowland Rainforest on Floodplains. Lucas McKinnon Determining the on Coastal Floodplains conservation value of remnants Introduction The degree of disturbance (i.e. the site condition) These guidelines provide background information of any remnant of Swamp Sclerophyll Forest may to assist land managers and approval authorities vary dependant on past land use, management Swamp Sclerophyll Forest in Wollongong LGA, showing the to identify remnants of Swamp Sclerophyll Forest practices and/or natural disturbance and this Lucas McKinnon transition between 3 components of the community, reedland, on Coastal Floodplains (hereafter referred to should be considered at the time of assessment. shrubland and sclerophyll forest. as Swamp Sclerophyll Forest), an Endangered Whilst not exhaustive, the following are a Ecological Community (EEC). For more detailed number of variations of Swamp Sclerophyll Forest information refer to the Swamp Sclerophyll Forest you may encounter: Profile and the NSW Scientific Committee Final It is important to take these factors into account Determination at: 1. Tree canopy intact with limited native when determining the conservation significance threatenedspecies.environment.nsw.gov.au vegetation in the understorey due to of remnants. underscrubbing, stock grazing pressure or too What is an Endangered Paperbark Forest on the NSW North Coast, a component frequent fire; For further assistance Ecological Community? of Swamp Sclerophyll Forest 2. Tree canopy intact (+/– reduced cover) with This and other EEC guidelines are available limited native vegetation in the understorey on DECC Threatened Species website: An ecological community is an assemblage dense and the community takes on the structure due to lack of fire or weed infestation (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemistry and Biological Activities of Essential Oils from Melaleuca L
    REVIEW ARTICLE 11 Chemistry and Biological Activities of Essential Oils from Melaleuca L. Species Luiz Claudio Almeida BARBOSA 1, 2 ( ) Cleber José SILVA 3 Róbson Ricardo TEIXEIRA 1 Renata Maria Strozi Alves MEIRA 4 Antônio Lelis PINHEIRO 5 Summary Essential oils from species Melaleuca genus, especially M. alternifolia (Maiden & Betche) Cheel, have been widely used worldwide in various industries. Th is review is a contribution to Melaleuca knowledge and describes fi ve important essential oil-producing species and two subspecies of Melaleuca in terms of their essential oil chemical composition, medicinal applications, and leaf morphoanatomy. Some relationships between essential oil composition of these species and important biological activities are presented. Useful parameters for the certifi cation of the essential oils are also highlighted. Key words Melaleuca, Myrtaceae, volatile oils, biological activities, leaf morphoanatomy 1 Federal University of Viçosa, Chemistry Department, 36570-000 Viçosa, MG, Brazil e-mail: [email protected] 2 Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Department of Chemistry, (ICEx), Av. Pres. Antônio Carlos, 6627, Campus Pampulha, CEP 31270-901, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil 3 Federal University of São João Del-Rei, Campus de Sete Lagoas, 35701-970, Sete Lagoas-MG, Brazil 4 Federal University of Viçosa, Plant Biology Department, 36570-000, Viçosa, MG, Brazil 5 Federal University of Viçosa, Forest Engineering Department, 36570-000, Viçosa, MG, Brazil Received: October 27, 2011 | Accepted: December 18, 2012 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank the Brazilian Agencies Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Supe- rior (CAPES), Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG) for their financial support.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloading Or Purchasing Online At
    A Field Guide to Native Flora Used by Honeybees in Tasmania 1 © 2009 Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. All rights reserved. ISBN 1 74151 947 0 ISSN 1440-6845 A Field Guide to Native Flora Used by Honeybees in Tasmania Publication No. 09/149 Project No. PRJ-002933 The information contained in this publication is intended for general use to assist public knowledge and discussion and to help improve the development of sustainable regions. You must not rely on any information contained in this publication without taking specialist advice relevant to your particular circumstances. While reasonable care has been taken in preparing this publication to ensure that information is true and correct, the Commonwealth of Australia gives no assurance as to the accuracy of any information in this publication. The Commonwealth of Australia, the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC), the authors or contributors expressly disclaim, to the maximum extent permitted by law, all responsibility and liability to any person, arising directly or indirectly from any act or omission, or for any consequences of any such act or omission, made in reliance on the contents of this publication, whether or not caused by any negligence on the part of the Commonwealth of Australia, RIRDC, the authors or contributors. The Commonwealth of Australia does not necessarily endorse the views in this publication. This publication is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. However, wide dissemination is encouraged. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the RIRDC Publications Manager on phone 02 6271 4165 Researcher Contact Details Name: Mark Leech of Brueckner Leech Consulting Email: [email protected] In submitting this report, the researcher has agreed to RIRDC publishing this material in its edited form.
    [Show full text]
  • • Threatened King Island Birds Conservation Action Plan
    • Threatened King Island Birds Conservation Action Plan • Version 1 • 31 March 2021 AUSTRALIA i. Acknowledgements Development and implementation of the Threatened King Island Birds CAP has been possible because of the enthusiasm, skill and effort of many people, in particular the King Island Landcare Group. This first version is itself an acknowledgement of their contributions. This Conservation Action Plan was funded through the generosity of BirdLife Australia’s supporters nationwide and received financial support from the Australian Bird Environment Foundation of BirdLife Australia. 2019 Workshop participants: Graeme Batey, Margaret Batey, Margaret Bennett, Sally Bryant, Luke Diddams, Stephen Florence, Robbie Gaffney, Rod Graham, Carolyn Hogg, Mark Holdsworth, Fiona Hume, Kirsty Kay, Jenny Lau, Kate Ravich, Helen Strickland, Janelle Thomas, Peter Volker, Pip Walsh, Matthew Webb, Alan Wiltshire, Anna Wind Front cover: King Island Brown Thornbill, image by Barry Baker ii. Recommended citation March (2021) Threatened King Island Birds Conservation Action Plan Version 1. BirdLife Australia, Melbourne. iii. Abbreviations Species KIBT King Island Brown Thornbill KIS King Island Scrubtit TKIB Threatened King Island Birds Organisations ANU Australian National University BLA BirdLife Australia BoKI Birds of King Island CAP Conservation Action Plan CCA Cradle Coast Authority DAWE Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment, Australia DPIPWE Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Tasmania FPA Forestry Practices Authority KIC King Island Council KIFMC King Island Fire Management Committee KINRM King Island Natural Resource Management Group HYDRO Hydro Tasmania PWS Tasmanian Parks & Wildlife Service STT Sustainable Timber Tasmania TFGA Tasmania Farmer and Graziers Association TFS Tasmania Fire Service TLC Tasmanian Land Conservancy WoK Wings on King 1 CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Composition and Antimicrobial Activity of Selected Essential Oils Against Staphylococcus Spp
    antibiotics Article Chemical Composition and Antimicrobial Activity of Selected Essential Oils against Staphylococcus spp. Isolated from Human Semen Miroslava Kaˇcániová 1,2,* , Margarita Terentjeva 3 , Jana Štefániková 4 , Jana Žiarovská 5, Tatsiana Savitskaya 6, Dmitrij Grinshpan 6, Przemysław Łukasz Kowalczewski 7 , Nenad Vukovic 8 and Eva Tvrdá 9 1 Department of Fruit Science, Viticulture and Enology, Faculty of Horticulture and Landscape Engineering, Slovak University of Agriculture, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 94976 Nitra, Slovakia 2 Department of Bioenergetics, Food Analysis and Microbiology, Institute of Food Technology and Nutrition, University of Rzeszow, Cwiklinskiej 1, 35-601 Rzeszow, Poland 3 Institute of Food and Environmental Hygiene, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, K. Helman, a iela 8, LV-3004 Jelgava, Latvia; [email protected] 4 AgroBioTech Research Centre, Slovak University of Agriculture, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 94976 Nitra, Slovakia; [email protected] 5 Department of Plant Genetics and Breeding, Faculty of Agrobiology and Food Resources, Slovak University of Agriculture, Tr. A. Hlinku 2, 949 76 Nitra, Slovakia; [email protected] 6 Research Institute for Physical Chemical Problems, Belarusian State University, Leningradskaya str. 14, 220030 Minsk, Belarus; [email protected] (T.S.); [email protected] (D.G.) 7 Department of Food Technology of Plant Origin, Pozna´nUniversity of Life Sciences, 31 Wojska Polskiego St., 60-624 Pozna´n,Poland; [email protected] 8 Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, University of Kragujevac, P.O. Box 12, 34000 Kragujevac, Serbia; [email protected] 9 Department of Animal Physiology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Slovak University of Agriculture, Tr.
    [Show full text]
  • TAXON:Melaleuca Alternifolia (Maiden & Betche) Cheel SCORE
    TAXON: Melaleuca alternifolia SCORE: 7.0 RATING: High Risk (Maiden & Betche) Cheel Taxon: Melaleuca alternifolia (Maiden & Betche) Cheel Family: Myrtaceae Common Name(s): narrow leaf paperbark Synonym(s): Melaleuca linariifolia var. alternifolia Maiden & Betche narrow leaf teatree teatree Assessor: Chuck Chimera Status: Assessor Approved End Date: 4 Apr 2019 WRA Score: 7.0 Designation: H(HPWRA) Rating: High Risk Keywords: Subtropical Tree, Essential Oil, Dense Stands, Wind-Dispersed, Coppices Qsn # Question Answer Option Answer 101 Is the species highly domesticated? y=-3, n=0 n 102 Has the species become naturalized where grown? 103 Does the species have weedy races? Species suited to tropical or subtropical climate(s) - If 201 island is primarily wet habitat, then substitute "wet (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) (See Appendix 2) High tropical" for "tropical or subtropical" 202 Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) (See Appendix 2) High 203 Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) y=1, n=0 n Native or naturalized in regions with tropical or 204 y=1, n=0 y subtropical climates Does the species have a history of repeated introductions 205 y=-2, ?=-1, n=0 n outside its natural range? 301 Naturalized beyond native range y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2), n= question 205 n 302 Garden/amenity/disturbance weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2) n 303 Agricultural/forestry/horticultural weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see Appendix 2) n 304 Environmental weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see Appendix 2) n 305 Congeneric
    [Show full text]
  • Draft King Island Biodiversity Management Plan 2010–2020
    DRAFT KING ISLAND BIODIVERSITY MANAGEMENT PLAN 2010–2020 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This Plan was prepared by Debbi Delaney under the auspices of the King Island Natural Resource Management Group Inc., with contributions from staff of the Threatened Species Section (Tasmanian Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment) and the Australian Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. The Plan was based upon a draft prepared by Lauren Barrow in 2008. The preparation of the Plan was funded by the Australian Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. Citation: Threatened Species Section (2010). King Island Biodiversity Management Plan. Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Hobart. © Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and the Environment This work is copyright. It may be reproduced for study, research or training purposes subject to an acknowledgement of the sources and no commercial usage or sale. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Section Head, Threatened Species Section, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Hobart. Note: The King Island Biodiversity Management Plan (KIBMP) has been prepared under the provisions of both the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) and the Tasmanian Threatened Species Protection Act 1995 (TSP Act). Adoption as a national Recovery Plan under the EPBC Act refers only to species listed under the EPBC Act. ISBN: Cover Photos: Left to right: Hooded Plover (Thinornis rubricollis) courtesy of Chris Tzaros (Birds Australia); Green and Golden Frog (Litoria raniformis) and leafy greenhood (Pterostylis cucullata subsp. cucullata) courtesy of Mark Wapstra.
    [Show full text]