Osteology and Phylogeny of Late Jurassic Ichthyosaurs from the Slottsmøya Member Lagerstätte (Spitsbergen, Svalbard)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Osteology and phylogeny of Late Jurassic ichthyosaurs from the Slottsmøya Member Lagerstätte (Spitsbergen, Svalbard) LENE L. DELSETT, AUBREY J. ROBERTS, PATRICK S. DRUCKENMILLER, and JØRN H. HURUM Delsett, L.L., Roberts, A.J., Druckenmiller, P.S., and Hurum, J.H. 2019. Osteology and phylogeny of Late Jurassic ichthyosaurs from the Slottsmøya Member Lagerstätte (Spitsbergen, Svalbard). Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 64 (4): 717–743. Phylogenetic relationships within the important ichthyosaur family Ophthalmosauridae are not well established, and more specimens and characters, especially from the postcranial skeleton, are needed. Three ophthalmosaurid specimens from the Tithonian (Late Jurassic) of the Slottsmøya Member Lagerstätte on Spitsbergen, Svalbard, are described. Two of the specimens are new and are referred to Keilhauia sp. and Ophthalmosauridae indet. respectively, whereas the third specimen consists of previously undescribed basicranial elements from the holotype of Cryopterygius kristiansenae. The species was recently synonymized with the Russian Undorosaurus gorodischensis, but despite many similarities, we conclude that there are too many differences, for example in the shape of the stapedial head and the proximal head of the humerus; and too little overlap between specimens, to warrant synonymy on species level. A phylogenetic analysis of Ophthalmosauridae is conducted, including all Slottsmøya Member specimens and new characters. The two proposed ophthalmosaurid clades, Ophthalmosaurinae and Platypterygiinae, are retrieved under some circumstances, but with lit- tle support. The synonymy of three taxa from the Slottsmøya Member Lagerstätte with Arthropterygius is not supported by the present evidence. Key words: Ichthyosauria, Ophthalmosauridae, Undorosaurus, Keilhauia, basicranium, phylogenetic analysis, Juras sic, Norway. Lene L. Delsett [[email protected]], Natural History Museum, P.O. Box 1172 Blindern, 0318 Oslo, Norway; Centre for Ecological and Evolutionary Synthesis, Department of Biosciences, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1066 Blindern, 0316 Oslo, Norway. Aubrey J. Roberts [[email protected]], The Natural History Museum, Earth Sciences, Cromwell Road, London SW7 5BD, UK. Patrick S. Druckenmiller [[email protected]], University of Alaska Museum, Fairbanks, Alaska, USA; Depart- ment of Geosciences, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Alaska, USA. Jørn H. Hurum [[email protected]], Natural History Museum, P.O. Box 1172 Blindern, 0318 Oslo, Norway. Received 20 November 2018, accepted 3 June 2019, available online 25 October 2019. Copyright © 2019 L.L. Delsett et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (for details please see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. 2016; Fernández and Talevi 2014; Fernández and Campos Introduction 2015; Paparella et al. 2016). However, a consensus of rela- tionships within the family remains elusive. While some Ichthyosaurs were important marine predators of the studies recognize the existence of two major subclades, Meso zoic seas. With one exception (Fischer et al. 2013a), Ophthalmosaurinae and Platypterygiinae (e.g., Fischer et all Late Jurassic–Cretaceous ichthyosaurs belong to Oph- al. 2012, 2016; Roberts et al. 2014; Delsett et al. 2017), thal mo sauridae, a cosmopolitan and speciose clade that others fail to recover this pattern or find only a mono- has been the subject of considerable interest in the past phyletic Platypterygiinae (Maxwell et al. 2015; Paparella decade leading to new insights regarding their evolution et al. 2016; Moon 2017). Understanding ophthalmosaurid at the Jurassic–Cretaceous boundary and extinction in phylogeny is critical for interpreting evolutionary rates the early Late Cretaceous (Fischer et al. 2013a, 2014a, and ecological diversification of the clade (Fischer et al. Acta Palaeontol. Pol. 64 (4): 717–743, 2019 https://doi.org/10.4202/app.00571.2018 718 ACTA PALAEONTOLOGICA POLONICA 64 (4), 2019 B 80° N Louisfjellet 78° N A 12° E 20°28E E ° Fig. 1. A. Map of Svalbard archipelago and the main island Spitsbergen with excavation area marked with an asterisk. B. Geological map of the excavation sites for the SML ophthalmosaurid specimens described and discussed in this paper (red dots); see Fig. 2. Adapted from Hurum et al. (2012). 2013b, 2016). This requires a better morphological under- Motani 2003; Maisch 2010). The Russian specimens are im- standing of new and existing specimens from which new portant to the understanding of palaeobiogeography and phy- and refined cranial and postcranial characters can be based logeny in the Boreal Ocean (Maxwell 2010) and recent pub- (Maxwell et al. 2015). lications have provided valuable information (Fischer et al. The Slottsmøya Member Lagerstätte (SML), Spitsbergen, 2011, 2013b; Zverkov et al. 2015b; Arkhangelsky et al. 2018; Norway, contains a diverse assemblage of marine reptiles, Zverkov and Efimov 2019; Zverkov and Prilepskaya 2019). particularly plesiosaurians and ichthyosaurs, and provides This paper formally describes three specimens from new data on ophthalmosaurids from at or near the Jurassic/ the Tithonian (Late Jurassic) of the Slottsmøya Member Cretaceous boundary (Hurum et al. 2012; Delsett et al. 2016; Lagerstätte. PMO 222.667 is referred to Keilhauia sp., pre- Fernández et al. 2018) (Figs. 1, 2). The SML taxa have some- viously described from the SML and significant for phy- times been recovered in a monophyletic Ophthalmosaurinae logenetic analysis because it preserves a combination of (but see Roberts et al. 2014; Paparella et al. 2016), but many basicranial and pectoral remains. A recent paper assigned more specimens from this locality remain to be described to newly described ophthalmosaurid specimens from localities further test this phylogenetic hypothesis. Many contempora- in Russia to Arthropterygius, and synonymized the SML neous ichthyosaur specimens to the SML assemblage have taxa Palvennia hoybergeti, Keilhauia nui, and Janusaurus been excavated along the Volga River in Russia, which were lundi with the genus (Zverkov and Prilepskaya 2019). These at the time connected by sea (Mutterlose et al. 2003). Due taxonomic conclusions are discussed briefly here, while a to problems with accessibility and inadequately published full evaluation of Arthropterygius in Boreal oceans will be descriptions, many Russian taxa have been reviewed based addressed thoroughly in a follow-up paper. PMO 224.252 only on publications and not on personal inspection, and is a skull referred to Ophthalmosauridae indet. The pa- often synonymized with better known taxa from Western per also describes basicranial elements from the holotype Europe (Maisch and Matzke 2000; McGowan and Motani of Cryopterygius kristiansenae (PMO 214.578), one of the 2003; Maisch 2010) but see Storrs et al. (2000). The only most complete and articulated ophthalmosaurids worldwide exception is Undorosaurus (Efimov 1997, 1999a) which is (Druckenmiller et al. 2012). In 2015, additional mechani- mostly regarded as valid (Storrs et al. 2000; McGowan and cal preparation was performed to prepare the specimen for DELSETT ET AL.—LATE JURASSIC ICHTHYOSAURS FROM SPITSBERGEN 719 display, and the basioccipital, a partial basisphenoid and m two stapes were removed for description. Similarities be- 50 tween the two genera, Undorosaurus and Cryopterygius, have been pointed out repeatedly (Druckenmiller et al. 2012; Arkhangelsky and Zverkov 2014; Delsett et al. 2017, 2018) Keilhauia nui Early and Cryopterygius kristiansenae was recently synonymized PMO 222.655 (holotype) Berriasian with Undorosaurus gorodischensis (Zverkov and Efimov Cretaceous 2019). In this contribution, the new interpretations of the 40 Ophthalmosauridae indet. holotype of Cryopterygius kristiansenae PMO 214.578 by PMO 222.658 Zverkov and Efimov (2019) are discussed in order to eval- uate their hypothesis of synonymy at the species level. A phylogenetic analysis is conducted including all described SML specimens in an expanded matrix using new postcra- nial characters to investigate their phylogenetic position and late 30 discuss interrelationships in Ophthalmosauridae. Institutional abbreviations.—CAMSM, Sedgwick Museum of Earth Sciences, UK; CMN, Canadian Museum of Nature, Canada; GLAHM, The Hunterian Museum, University of Cryopterygius kristiansenae Glasgow, UK; IRSNB, Royal Belgian Institute of Natural 20 PMO 214.578 (holotype) Sciences, Brussels, Belgium; LEICT, New Walk Museum and Ophthalmosauridae indet. Art Gallery, Leicester, UK; LEIUG, University of Lei cester, PMO 224.250 UK; MANCH, Manchester Museum, UK; MLP, Museo de Palvennia hoybergeti Jurassic la Plata, La Plata, Argentina; MOZ, Museo de Paleontología Tithonian PMO 222.669 y Mineralogía Prof. Juan F. Olsacher, Zapala, Argentina; Palvennia hoybergeti NHMUK, Natural History Museum, London, UK; OUMNH, middle 10 SVB 1451 (holotype) Oxford University Museum, UK; PMO, Natural History Museum, paleontological collections, Oslo, Norway; SNHM Ophthalmosauridae indet. Staat liches Naturhistorisches Museum Braunschweig, Ger- PMO 224.252 many; SNSB-BSPG, Bayerische Staats sammlung für Palä- ontologie und Geologie, Munich, Ger many; SGS, SVB, Sval- bard Museum, Longyear, Spits bergen; UPM, Paleonto logical 0 Echinoderm marker bed Museum of Undory, Ul’ya novsk, Russia. Janusaurus lundi Other abbreviations.—CI,