DOCSLIB.ORG

Vol 1., Issue 1 2018 2018

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Vol 1., Issue 1 2018 2018 Vol 1., Issue 1 2018 2018 T HE J OURNAL OF D AVI D F OS T ER W ALLACE The International David Foster Wallace Society S T was founded to promote and sustain the long-term U D scholarly and independent study of David Foster IES Wallace’s writing. To these ends, the Society wel- comes diverse, peer-reviewed scholarship and seeks to expand the critical boundaries of Wallace studies. We recognize and champion the visual, the alternative, and the literary: the presence of minds at work. The Society showcases a variety V of projects—at conferences, on panels, in our print OL publication, The Journal of David Foster Wallace 1., Studies, and through other non-traditional modes I of scholarly expression. SSUE 1 www.dfwsociety.org cover design by david jensen The Journal of David Foster Wallace Studies is published by the International David Foster Wallace Society. Copyright © 2018 International David Foster Wallace Society The Journal of David Foster Wallace studies (Print) ISSN 2576-9995 The Journal of David Foster Wallace studies (Online) ISSN 2577-0039 Designed by David Jensen Cover art copyright © 2018 David Jensen STAFF Editor Clare Hayes-Brady, University College Dublin Managing Editor Tony McMahon Advisory Board Matt Bucher Grace Chipperfeld Linda Daley David Hering Adam Kelly Jonathan Laskovsky Matthew Luter Nick Maniatis Mike Miley Alexander Moran Rob Short Lucas Thompson Subscriptions To subscribe to the Journal of David Foster Wallace Studies, visit the International David Foster Wallace Society on the web at https://dfwsociety.org. Membership in IDFWS includes a reduced sub- scription price for the journal as well as access to electronic editions. Submissions All submissions are welcome. Send directly to [email protected]. Follow us on Twitter @dfwsociety VOLUME 1, NUMBER 1 FALL 2018 Introduction Why a Wallace Studies Journal Now? by Lucas Thompson ......... 7 Letters Letter from the Editor, Clare Hayes-Brady ................................. 11 Essays Subjectivity and Faith in Updike and Wallace: A Comparison of the Interpretation of Kierkegaard in Rabbit, Run and Infnite Jest by Allard den Dulk and Preben Jordal ........................................ 17 How to Be: Buddhism, Boredom, and the Practice of Awareness in The Pale King by Joseph B. Nash ............................ 55 Another Lien on Life: David Foster Wallace’s Institutional Perspective by Colbert Root ................................... 85 Loosening the Jar: Contemplating Race in David Foster Wallace’s Short Fiction by Colton Saylor ............ 119 “ The Last Word”: Sex-Changes and Second-Wave Feminism in The Broom of the System by Daniela Franca Jofe ................... 151 Reviews Review of Adam S. Miller’s The Gospel According to David Foster Wallace: Boredom and Addiction in an Age of Distraction by Grace Chipperfeld .............................................................. 185 Review of Lucas Thompson’s Global Wallace: David Foster Wallace and World Literature by Matthew Luter ....................................... 189 Contributors’ Notes .................................................................. 193 WHY A WALLACE STUDIES JOURNAL NOW? s far as I can tell, Greg Carlisle was the frst to call publicly Afor a journal devoted to David Foster Wallace. Carlisle made his case in the 2010 introduction to Consider David Foster Wallace, a collection that emerged from the frst international academic event devoted solely to Wallace’s work—the 2009 Liverpool conference organized by David Hering. Arguing that a dedicated journal would provide both “a regular forum for continuing the critical conversa- tion about Wallace’s work” and a “central, structured locus for that formal conversation,” Carlisle predicted it would also help cement Wallace’s place as “the most important author of the late 20th and early 21st centuries.” At the time, many were sympathetic to Carl- isle’s argument, though I think Stephen J. Burn was right to say, in his 2010 review of this same collection, that beginning such a proj- ect would be somewhat premature, given the understandably pre- liminary understanding of Wallace’s work. For Burn, the unbridled enthusiasm of advocates like Carlisle needed to be reined in a little before the sober, dispassionate assessment of the fction and essays could begin. Moreover, Burn saw the collection as revealing a schol- arly feld that was only just beginning to fnd its feet, and identifed a prevailing spirit of inquiry that was far too uncritical in its praise for the recently deceased author. 7 The Journal of David Foster Wallace Studies Nearly a decade on, we have witnessed an explosion of interest in Wallace’s work, both from lay readers and academics. The interven- ing years have seen the publication of numerous monographs and edited collections devoted to Wallace, as well as an ever-ballooning number of journal articles and book chapters. (The David Foster Wallace Research Group at the University of Glasgow is heroically tracking these publications, picking up where Nick Maniatis’s Howl- ing Fantods page on academic work left of.) Burn’s 2010 complaint that the feld was too saturated with graduate students and early career academics no longer holds. Many prominent professors and other high-profle scholars have since weighed in on aspects of Wal- lace’s work, and while many graduate students are still producing groundbreaking work in dissertation projects, an increasingly di- verse collection of scholars (from many career stages, disciplines, and research interests) have also joined the conversation. In fact, the conversation has more interlocutors now than ever before, as inter- pretive communities in academia and well beyond wrestle with the meaning of Wallace’s work and the ways it continues to speak to our contemporary moment. Now that Wallace Studies has a genuine claim to being viable as a feld, the moment feels right for the inauguration of this kind of journal. While scholarly work will of course continue to be pub- lished elsewhere, a journal devoted to Wallace opens up a space within which a particular kind of conversation can be extended. It also provides room for new voices to enter the critical discussion and sets out a clearly defned zone of scholarly inquiry where vari- ous ideas and questions can be worked through rigorously and col- laboratively. Why, for instance, is Wallace’s work crucial to the way we understand the trajectory of US literary postmodernism? Is he truly a representative fgure of his generation, his cultural moment, and perhaps even his nation? And in the wake of a recent backlash, stemming from charges of misogyny and racism, in what terms can we justify still reading and teaching him? 8 Lucas Thompson Signifcantly, an increasing number of scholars have recent- ly pushed back against certain aspects of Wallace’s work, enact- ing something like what Judith Fetterley characterizes as “resistant readings.” Such work casts a critical eye on Wallace’s engagement with class, gender, race, politics, and sexuality, and in doing so has unearthed dimensions of his project that had previously been ne- glected. Other critics have read his work in light of recent theo- retical developments and preoccupations, which have also opened up new interpretive possibilities. I am thinking here of approaches from such disparate felds as afect studies, economics, recent ana- lytic philosophy, world literature, whiteness studies, religious studies, and narratology, to name just a few. We will no doubt continue to see many other frameworks and sub-disciplines be brought to bear on his fction and essays in the years ahead. There are other pressing questions that will surely also be tak- en up in the coming years, both in this journal and beyond. How, for instance, might the claims of post-critique scholars alter our approach to Wallace’s work? What happens when we stop trying to “see through,” “penetrate,” and “unmask” and instead attempt more generous and reparative readings? And how might new dis- coveries in the social sciences concerning emotions, moods, feelings, and afects change the way we account for his fction? Questions of reception might also prove fruitful. How, for instance, might a richer account of Wallace’s readers, who of course comprise many nation- alities, genders, classes, etc. allow us to see what is most valuable in his work? By what methods might we gain a more accurate sense of his audience and the myriad ways he is read? I think we can also look forward to seeing, in the coming years, scholarship on unpublished or little-known work from the archive and elsewhere. Our collective understanding of what exactly is in the voluminous Wallace collection at the Harry Ransom Center is still incomplete, and those prepared to do the heavy lifting of archival re- search will doubtless unearth many more important discoveries. We 9 The Journal of David Foster Wallace Studies might look forward to seeing treatments of previously unpublished or obscure texts, and perhaps even expanded editions of Infnite Jest and The Pale King, which would no doubt recalibrate our understand- ing of these novels. The forthcoming collection of Wallace’s corre- spondence, edited by Burn, will doubtless also inspire new scholar- ship. We will also see analyses that deploy new theoretical angles or developments, which even Wallace―despite his uncanny intellectu- al and cultural clairvoyance―could not have foreseen. The complicated question of Wallace’s inheritors is always worth taking up, as his legacy continues to shape the work of younger writers. Likewise, exploring art in other genres that takes inspira- tion from Wallace might also prove illuminating since it speaks back in intriguing ways to various source texts. We are also likely to see, I expect, more writing that foregrounds the idiosyncrasies of par- ticular critics and writers wrestling with his work. Jane Tompkins’s plea, back in the 1980s, for critics to remove the “straitjacket” of faux-objectivity and come clean on their own investments is still a provocation to many felds―including our own. Such writing, done well, could help us understand more clearly why Wallace’s work still matters and what kind of things it can allow us to do, see, feel, or know.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Implications of Neurobiology on the Study and Interpretation of Scripture
    READING THE BODY, READING SCRIPTURE: THE IMPLICATIONS OF NEUROBIOLOGY ON THE STUDY AND INTERPRETATION OF SCRIPTURE David Cave This paper considers what the neurobiological reading of the body implies for the reading of scripture. By ‘the neurological reading of the body’ I refer to how modern science and culture draw upon cognitive science and genetics to explain and to understand what it means to be human. And by the ‘reading of scripture’ I refer to the practice of the various religious traditions to understand our humanity based on claims of inspired and revealed insights, said to come from some agency transcendent to our naturalized mind and body. I contend that within a naturalistic system these two readings are not mutually exclusive but interrelate such that the reading of one informs and illumines the reading of the other. Among many quarters, the reading of the body has come to rival, even replace, the reading of scripture (and here I refer to scripture broadly understood, of no particular religious tradition) for defining and guiding us in what it means to be a human being. In a recent opinion piece in the New York Times, columnist David Brooks, in “The Neural Buddhists,” comments on the widespread interest in neuroscience and genetics and surmises that its proponents will not so much undermine a belief in God as undermine the claims of scripture. He says, “The atheism debate is a textbook example of how a scientific revolution can change public cul- ture . and yet my guess is that the atheism debate is going to be a side- show.
    [Show full text]
  • Signifying Rappers PDF Book
    SIGNIFYING RAPPERS PDF, EPUB, EBOOK David Foster Wallace | 176 pages | 29 Aug 2013 | Penguin Books Ltd | 9780241968314 | English | London, United Kingdom Signifying Rappers PDF Book But so too you know all this already , the book is dated. His final novel, The Pale King , was published posthumously in For example, my favorite quote from the book: "Ironies abound,of course, as ironies must when cash and art do lunch. I agree to the Terms and Conditions. But, like my diet Dr Pepper left outside overnight or a green pear eaten too soon, this book hints at DFW's later genius without quite delivering the thing you want. Both of the authors are brilliant men, but I felt as if their arguments were often dressed in such intricate language that it was easy to lose track of the overarching idea. Legendary thriller writer David Morrell transports readers to the fogbound streets of London, where a It's interesting to see our hero in his youth; his brief descriptions of his grad school life are priceless. Joyce A. David Foster Wallace and Mark Costello's exuberant exploration of rap music and culture. They aren't trying to make personal con After reading this, I'm still shocked that it even exists. Less about rap than the dystopia that was Reagan's s. I Dream of Jeannie vs race riots. He could conjure up an absurd future If this is desegregation, then shopping malls hold treasure Are pop-products ever relevant? But this does not invalidate their thoughts, nor does it make reading this a waste of time.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Intention and Normative Belief Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/8725w3wp Author Chislenko, Eugene Publication Date 2016 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Intention and Normative Belief By Eugene Chislenko A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in Charge: Professor Hannah Ginsborg, Co-Chair Professor R. Jay Wallace, Co-Chair Professor Hubert Dreyfus Professor Tania Lombrozo Spring 2016 Copyright by Eugene Chislenko 2016 Abstract Intention and Normative Belief by Eugene Chislenko Doctor of Philosophy in Philosophy University of California, Berkeley Professor Hannah Ginsborg and Professor R. Jay Wallace, Co-Chairs People can be malicious, perverse, compulsive, self-destructive, indifferent, or in conflict with their own better judgment. This much is obvious—but on many traditional views, it seems puzzling or even impossible. Many philosophers, from Plato and Aristotle to Kant, Davidson, and others, have thought that we act only “under the guise of the good,” doing only what we see as good, or best, or what we ought to do. These “guise-of-the-good” views offered a way to make sense of the attribution and explanation of action, while maintaining a generous view of human nature as essentially pursuing the good. But are they not hopelessly narrow and naïve? It seems clear that we often do what we do not see as good, and even what we see as bad.
    [Show full text]
  • Cognition, Consciousness, and Dualism in David Foster Wallace's
    Redgate, Jamie Peter (2017) Wallace and I: cognition, consciousness, and dualism in David Foster Wallace’s fiction. PhD thesis, University of Glasgow. https://theses.gla.ac.uk/8635/ Copyright and moral rights for this work are retained by the author A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge This work cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Enlighten: Theses https://theses.gla.ac.uk/ [email protected] WALLACE AND I Cognition, Consciousness, and Dualism in David Foster Wallace’s Fiction Jamie Peter Redgate Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in English Literature School of Critical Studies College of Arts University of Glasgow September 2017 © Jamie Peter Redgate 2017 i Abstract Though David Foster Wallace is well known for declaring that “Fiction’s about what it is to be a fucking human being” (Conversations 26), what he actually meant by the term “human being” has been quite forgotten. It is a truism in Wallace studies that Wallace is a posthuman writer whose characters are devoid of any kind of inner interiority or soul. This is a misreading of Wallace’s work. My argument is that Wallace’s work and his characters—though they are much neglected in Wallace studies—are animated by the tension between materialism and essentialism, and this dualism is one of the major ways in which Wallace bridges postmodern fiction with something new.
    [Show full text]
  • {PDF EPUB} Signifying Rappers Rap and Race in the Urban Present by David Foster Wallace Signifying Rappers: Rap and Race in the Urban Present by David Foster Wallace
    Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} Signifying Rappers Rap and Race in the Urban Present by David Foster Wallace Signifying Rappers: Rap and Race in the Urban Present by David Foster Wallace. Completing the CAPTCHA proves you are a human and gives you temporary access to the web property. What can I do to prevent this in the future? If you are on a personal connection, like at home, you can run an anti-virus scan on your device to make sure it is not infected with malware. If you are at an office or shared network, you can ask the network administrator to run a scan across the network looking for misconfigured or infected devices. Another way to prevent getting this page in the future is to use Privacy Pass. You may need to download version 2.0 now from the Chrome Web Store. Cloudflare Ray ID: 66063b3e5a5a4dd6 • Your IP : 116.202.236.252 • Performance & security by Cloudflare. Signifying Rappers: Rap and Race in the Urban Present Costello, Mark and Wallace, David Foster. Title: Signifying Rappers: Rap and Race in the . Publisher: Ecco Pr. Publication Date: 1990. Binding: Paperback. Book Condition: Very Good. About this title. Explores the development of Rap music and examines its place in American culture. From Publishers Weekly: Based primarily on the authors' experiences hanging out with the owners of a small rap music production company, the first part of this long essay on understanding rap describes the setting in which this subversive music has arisen--the urban ghetto, in this case, the North Dorchester section of Boston.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding David Foster Wallace, Marshall Boswell LEG the Legacy of David Foster Wallace, Ed
    The Journal of David Foster Wallace Studies is published by the International David Foster Wallace Society. Copyright © 2019 International David Foster Wallace Society The Journal of David Foster Wallace Studies (Print) ISSN 2576-9995 The Journal of David Foster Wallace Studies (Online) ISSN 2577-0039 Interior designed by David Jensen Cover art copyright © 2019 Chris Ayers STAFF Editor Clare Hayes-Brady, University College Dublin Managing Editor Matt Bucher Editorial Board Grace Chipperfield Alexander Moran Ándrea Laurencell Sheridan Rob Short Matthew Luter Advisory Board David Hering Jonathan Laskovsky Adam Kelly Mike Miley Nick Maniatis Lucas Thompson Linda Daley Subscriptions To subscribe to the Journal of David Foster Wallace Studies, simply join the International David Foster Wallace Society (http://dfwsociety.org). Membership includes a subscription to our journal as well as access to electronic editions of the journal. Submissions All submissions are welcome. Send directly to [email protected]. Follow us on Twitter @dfwsociety Volume 1, Number 2 Fall 2019 Special Issue Guest Editors: Alice Bennett and Peter Sloane Volume 1, Number 2 • Fall 2019 Preface by Clare Hayes-Brady ...................................................... 7 Wallace Short Things by Alice Bennett and Peter Sloane .......... 11 Footnotes, Footsteps, Ghostprints by David Punter .................... 25 Wallace’s Ambivalence toward Insight: The Epiphany in “Octet” and “Adult World” (I) and (II) by Jacob Hovind ......................... 45 “The lie is that it’s one or the other”: Extracting “Forever Overhead” and “Church Not Made with Hands” from the Short Story Cycle by Rob Mayo ........................................................... 71 The Case of “Think” in Brief Interviews with Hideous Men: Is Dialogism Possible? by Pia Masiero ............................................ 95 “The Fragment”: “Cede,” Ancient Rome, and The Pale King by Tim Groenland ...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Interview with David Foster Wallace by Larry Mccaffery
    Rev. Contemporary Fiction | http://www.centerforbookculture.org/interviews/interview_wallace.htmlSummer 1993 An Interview With David Foster Wallace by Larry McCaffery Q: Your essay following this interview is going to be seen by some people as being basically an apology for television. What’s your response to the familiar criticism that television fosters relationships with illusions or simulations of real people (Reagan being a kind of quintessential example)? It’s a try at a comprehensive diagnosis, not an apology. .. viewers’ relationship with is essentially puerile and dependent, as are all relationships based on seduction. This is hardly news. But what’s seldom acknowledged is how complex and ingenious ’s seductions are. It’s seldom acknowledged that viewers’ relationship with is, albeit debased, intricate and profound. It’s easy for older writers just to bitch about ’s hege- mony over the .. art market, to say the world’s gone to hell in a basket and shrug and have done with it. But I think younger writers owe themselves a richer account of just why ’s become such a dominating force on people’s consciousness, if only because we under forty have spent our whole conscious lives being “part” of ’s audience. Q: Television may be more complex than what most people realize, but it seems rarely to attempt to “challenge” or “disturb” its audience, as you’ve written me you wish to. Is it that sense of challenge and pain that makes your work more “serious” than most television shows? I had a teacher I liked who used to say good fiction’s job was to comfort the disturbed and disturb the comfortable.
    [Show full text]
  • Dirty Hands: the One and the Many Charles Blattberg Professor Of
    Dirty Hands: The One and the Many Charles Blattberg Professor of Political Philosophy Université de Montréal The problem of “dirty hands” has appeared in the literature of political philosophy only relatively recently. No doubt this is connected to the fact that, as Alasdair MacIntyre points out, far more has been written on the theme of moral dilemmas in the past fifty years or so than in all the time from Plato until then.1 Talk of dirty hands, after all, is the application of this theme to politics. Listen to what Hoederer, in Sartre’s play of the same name, has to say about it: How you cling to your purity, young man! How afraid you are to soil your hands! All right, stay pure! What good will it do? Why did you join us? Purity is an idea for a yogi or a monk. You intellectuals and bourgeois anarchists use it as a pretext for doing nothing. To do nothing, to remain motionless, arms at your sides, wearing kid gloves. Well, I have dirty hands. Right up to the elbows. I’ve plunged them in filth and blood. But what do you hope? Do you think you can govern innocently?2 Hoederer’s last question can apply not only to the matter of ongoing governance but also to crisis situations such as the “ticking time bomb” scenario, which has become prominent in the literature. Imagine you’re a well-meaning elected political leader and your security forces have captured a terrorist. He knows the location of a recently planted bomb but he refuses to divulge it.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 CONFERENCE PRESENTATIONS Professor Dermot Moran Phd, Dlitt
    Dermot Moran Conference Presentations 1979–2016 CONFERENCE PRESENTATIONS Professor Dermot Moran PhD, DLitt, MRIA Full Professor of Philosophy (Chair of Metaphysics & Logic) University College Dublin Updated Saturday, June 11, 2016 [214 Conference Presentations since 1979] 2016 1. Dermot Moran, Workshop on Phenomenology of Anxiety, Marie Curie, Newman House, Dublin [4th November 2016] 2. Dermot Moran, Exexutive Committee Member, 55th Annual SPEP Conference, Utah Valley University, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA [20-23 October 2016] 3. “Hermeneutics of the Body,” Invited Speaker, North American Society for Philosophical Hermeneutics (NASPH), 55th Annual SPEP Conference, Utah Valley University, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA [20 October 2016] 4. Dermot Moran, Keynote Speaker, Conference on Plotinus and Neoplatonism: Continuing Influence and Contemporary Relevance, Rochester Institute of Technology, 16-18 October 2016 [16 October 2016] 5. Dermot Moran, Committee Member, Meeting of Programme Committee, 24th World Congress of Philosophy, Peking University, Beijing 3-5 September 2016 6. Dermot Moran, Plenary Speaker, World Congress in Philosophy: “The Philosophy of Aristotle”, School of Philosophy, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece, 9-15 July 2016. 7. Dermot Moran, Phenomenology Summer School in Venice, DIPARTIMENTO DI FILOSOFIA E BENI CULTURALI/ Venice, Italy, 10-15 July 2016 [http://www.phenomenologyinvenice.com] 8. Dermot Moran, Commentator on Jacob Rump, ‘Sense and Significance in the Later Husserl’, 46th Meeting of the Husserl Circle, Loyola University Chicago, 15-18 June 2016 [Wed 15 June 2016] 9. Dermot Moran, President, Steering Committee Meeting, Comité Directeur, Réunion, Université Houphouët-Boigny d'Abidjan-Cocody, Abidjan, Ivory Coast, Africa [Friday 3rd & Saturday 4 June 2016] 1 Dermot Moran Conference Presentations 1979–2016 10.
    [Show full text]
  • Editing David Foster Wallace
    ‘NEUROTIC AND OBSESSIVE’ BUT ‘NOT TOO INTRANSIGENT OR DEFENSIVE’: Editing David Foster Wallace By Zac Farber 1 In December of 1993, David Foster Wallace printed three copies of a manuscript he had taken to calling the “longer thing” and gave one to his editor, Michael Pietsch, one to a woman he was trying to impress, and one to Steven Moore, a friend and the managing editor of the Review of Contemporary Fiction, whose edits and cuts Wallace wished to compare with Pietsch’s. The manuscript, which Little, Brown and Company would publish as Infinite Jest in 1996, was heavy (it required both of Moore’s hands to carry) and, Moore recalled, unruly: It’s a mess—a patchwork of different fonts and point sizes, with numerous handwritten corrections/additions on most pages, and paginated in a nesting pattern (e.g., p. 22 is followed by 22A-J before resuming with p. 23, which is followed by 23A-D, etc). Much of it is single-spaced, and what footnotes existed at this stage appear at the bottom of pages. (Most of those in the published book were added later.) Several states of revision are present: some pages are early versions, heavily overwritten with changes, while others are clean final drafts. Throughout there are notes in the margins, reminders to fix something or other, adjustments to chronology (which seems to have given Wallace quite a bit of trouble), even a few drawings and doodles.1 Wallace followed some of Pietsch and Moore’s suggestions and cut about 40 pages from the first draft of the manuscript2, but before publication he added more than 200 pages of additional material, including an opening chapter that many critics have praised as the novel’s best and more than 100 pages of (often footnoted) endnotes.3 Editing Wallace could be demanding, and those who attempted it found themselves faced with the difficulty of correcting a man with a prodigious understanding of the byzantine syntactical and grammatical rules of the English language.
    [Show full text]
  • The Work of David Foster Wallace and Post-Postmodernism Charles Reginald Nixon Submitted in Accordance with the Requirements
    - i - The work of David Foster Wallace and post-postmodernism Charles Reginald Nixon Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Leeds School of English September 2013 - ii - - iii - The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. © 2013 The University of Leeds and Charles Reginald Nixon The right of Charles Reginald Nixon to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. - iv - - v - Acknowledgements (With apologies to anyone I have failed to name): Many thanks to Hamilton Carroll for guiding this thesis from its earliest stages. Anything good here has been encouraged into existence by him, anything bad is the result of my stubborn refusal to listen to his advice. Thanks, too, to Andrew Warnes for additional guidance and help along the way, and to the many friends and colleagues at the University of Leeds and beyond who have provided assistance, advice and encouragement. Stephen Burn, in particular, and the large and growing number of fellow Wallace scholars I have met around the world have contributed much to this work's intellectual value; our conversations have been amongst my most treasured, from a scholarly perspective and just because they have been so enjoyable.
    [Show full text]
  • Signifying Rappers Free
    FREE SIGNIFYING RAPPERS PDF David Foster Wallace | 176 pages | 29 Aug 2013 | Penguin Books Ltd | 9780241968314 | English | London, United Kingdom Signifying Rappers by David Foster Wallace, Mark Costello | NOOK Book (eBook) | Barnes & Noble® Uh-oh, it looks like your Internet Explorer is out of date. For a better shopping experience, please upgrade now. Javascript is not enabled in your browser. Enabling JavaScript in your browser will allow you to experience all the features Signifying Rappers our site. Learn how to enable JavaScript on your browser. Home 1 Books 2. Read an excerpt of this book! Add to Wishlist. Sign in to Purchase Instantly. Explore Now. Buy As Signifying Rappers. Signifying Rappers issued a fan's challenge to the giants of rock writing, Greil Marcus, Robert Signifying Rappers, and Lester Bangs: Signifying Rappers the new street beats of set us free, as rock had always promised? Back in print at last, Signifying Rappers is a rare record of a city and a summer by two great thinkers, writers, and friends. With a new foreword by Mark Costello on his Signifying Rappers writing with David Foster Wallace, this rerelease cannot be missed. Product Details About the Author. About the Author. David Foster Wallace was born in Ithaca, New York, in and raised in Illinois, where he was a regionally ranked Signifying Rappers tennis player. He received bachelor of arts degrees in philosophy and English from Amherst College and wrote what would become his first novel, The Broom of the Systemas his senior English thesis. He received a masters of fine arts from University of Arizona in and briefly pursued graduate work in philosophy at Harvard University.
    [Show full text]