DOCSLIB.ORG

Victim, Perpetrator, and Incident Characteristics of Sexual Victimization of Youth in Juvenile Facilities, 2018 – Statistical Tables Michael B

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Victim, Perpetrator, and Incident Characteristics of Sexual Victimization of Youth in Juvenile Facilities, 2018 – Statistical Tables Michael B U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau of Justice Statistics November 2020, NCJ 255446 Bureau of Justice Statistics Bureau National Survey of Youth in Custody, 2018 Victim, Perpetrator, and Incident Characteristics of Sexual Victimization of Youth in Juvenile Facilities, 2018 – Statistical Tables Michael B. Field and Elizabeth Davis, BJS Statisticians his report describes victim, perpetrator, Organization of the statistical tables and incident characteristics of sexual victimization of youth in juvenile The statistical tables are organized into two Tfacilities. These tables accompany the full major sections. Bureau of Justice Statistics (BJS) report Sexual Section 1 includes demographics and Victimization Reported by Youth in Juvenile characteristics of youth who reported having Facilities, 2018 (NCJ 253042, BJS, December been sexually victimized in the 12 months 2019), which provides national estimates of 1,2 prior to the survey. This section also includes sexual victimization in juvenile facilities. · information on the number of incidents Data are from BJS’s 2018 National Survey of experienced in the last 12 months, whether Tables Statistical Youth in Custody (NSYC-3), conducted from the victim was physically injured in any of the March to December of 2018. The NSYC-3 was incidents, when the first incident occurred, and conducted in 327 facilities that housed juveniles, any prior contact or relationship between the including 217 state-owned or state-operated victim and perpetrator(s). facilities and 110 locally or privately operated Section 2 includes perpetrator and incident facilities that held state-placed youth under characteristics for the most serious incident of contract. An additional five sampled facilities sexual victimization during the 12 months prior were excluded because data on sexual to the survey, as reported by the respondent. victimization were not collected or could not Most-serious incidents in this section were be used. The NSYC-3 sexual-victimization determined by first ranking incidents reported survey was completed by 6,049 youth, who by each youth into one of the four categories: were sampled from at least one facility in every (1) involving “forced or coerced sexual acts,” state and the District of Columbia. See the (2) involving “other forced or coerced sexual Methodology in the full BJS report for detailed activity,” (3) involving “sexual acts with no force information on how the data were collected or coercion,” or (4) involving “other sexual and analyzed. activity with no force or coercion.” Each youth The NSYC is part of BJS’s National Prison was then asked about the most recent incident Rape Statistics Program and collects data on from the highest-ranked category. allegations of sexual victimization as required by the Prison Rape Elimination Act of 2003 (PREA; P.L. 108-79). 1For the full report, see https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/ pdf/svryjf18.pdf. 2For supplemental tables, see https://www.bjs.gov/content/ pub/pdf/svryjf18st.pdf. Highlights Sexual victimization in the past year Most-serious incidents of sexual victimization A higher percentage of male (6.1%) than female (2.9%) In most-serious incidents of staff sexual misconduct, an youth reported staff sexual misconduct. estimated 91% of incidents involved only female staff, while 6% involved only male staff. A higher percentage of female (4.7%) than male (1.6%) youth reported youth-on-youth victimization. An estimated 60% of most-serious incidents of youth-on-youth sexual victimization and 61% of A higher percentage of white (6.3%) and black (6.7%) most-serious incidents of staff sexual misconduct youth reported staff sexual misconduct than Hispanic involved a single perpetrator. youth (3.2%). In most-serious incidents of youth-on-youth sexual A higher percentage of white youth (3.1%) reported victimization in which there was a single perpetrator youth-on-youth sexual victimization than black (1.2%) reported, 57% of the time the perpetrator was white or Hispanic (1.0%) youth. and 26% of the time the perpetrator was black. A higher percentage of youth who identified their In most-serious incidents of youth-on-youth sexual sexual orientation as lesbian, gay, bisexual, or victimization in which there were multiple perpetrators something else (12.0%) reported sexual victimization reported, 35% of the time all perpetrators were black, than heterosexual youth (6.5%). and 20% of the time all perpetrators were white. A higher percentage of youth who identified as a A reported 36% of most-serious incidents of staff sexual different gender from their sex recorded at birth misconduct involved force or coercion—72% of the (19.1%) reported sexual victimization than youth who time when the perpetrator was male, 32% of the time identified with their biological sex (6.8%). when the perpetrator was female. For nearly every disability and mental-health condition In most-serious incidents of youth-on-youth sexual measured, youth with the disability or condition victimization, an estimated 33% of victims were reported higher rates of youth-on-youth sexual threatened with physical harm, 22% were threatened victimization and staff sexual misconduct than youth with a weapon, and 14% were given drugs or alcohol. without the disability or condition. About half of youth (51%) who reported prior sexual victimization in another juvenile facility also reported sexual victimization in their current facility. An estimated 81% of youth who reported victimization by another youth and 91% of youth who reported staff sexual misconduct reported more than one incident. An estimated 32% of youth who reported victimization by another youth and 3% of youth who reported staff sexual misconduct reported physical injuries. About half of youth victimized by another youth (50%) and about half of youth victims of staff sexual misconduct (47%) reported that they experienced their first victimization during their first month in the facility. Victim, Perpetrator, and Incident Characteristics of Sexual Victimization of Youth in Juvenile Facilities, 2018 – Statistical Tables | November 2020 2 Terms and definitions Force or coercion includes— • being shown something sexual, such as physical force or threat of force pictures or a movie • other sexual activity, whether or not it other forms of pressure or coercion, such involved touching. as threatening to get the youth in trouble; giving the youth money, favors, protection, or other Staff sexual misconduct that either did or did not special treatment; or repeatedly asking the youth to involve force or coercion includes— engage in sexual activity. | sexual acts Sexual victimization reported by youth involves any • contact between the penis and the vagina forced or coerced sexual activity with another youth or anus and any sexual activity with facility staff.3 • penetration of the anal or vaginal opening Youth-on-youth sexual victimization involving of another person by a hand, finger, or force or coercion includes— other object | forced or coerced sexual acts • contact between the mouth and the penis, • contact between the penis and the vagina vagina, or anus or anus • rubbing of another person’s penis or vagina • penetration of the anal or vaginal opening with a hand. of another person by a hand, finger, or | other sexual activity that did not meet the other object description of sexual acts above • contact between the mouth and the penis, • kissing on the lips vagina, or anus • kissing another body part, not including • rubbing of another person’s penis or vagina those listed under sexual acts above with a hand. • being shown something sexual, such as | other forced or coerced sexual activity that did pictures or a movie not meet the description of sexual • other sexual activity, whether or not it acts above involved touching. • kissing on the lips • kissing another body part, not including those listed under sexual acts above 3The NSYC does not distinguish between completed and attempted sexual victimization. Victim, Perpetrator, and Incident Characteristics of Sexual Victimization of Youth in Juvenile Facilities, 2018 – Statistical Tables | November 2020 3 Section 1: Sexual victimization in the past year TABLE 1.1. Youth reporting sexual victimization in juvenile facilities, by type of incident and selected youth characteristics, 2018 TABLE 1.2. Youth reporting sexual victimization in juvenile facilities, by type of incident and selected victim experiences, 2018 TABLE 1.3a. Youth reporting sexual victimization in juvenile facilities, by type of incident and reported disability or mental-health status, 2018 TABLE 1.3b. Youth reporting sexual victimization in juvenile facilities, by type of incident and results of mental-health screener, 2018 TABLE 1.4. Youth-on-youth sexual victimization involving force or coercion in juvenile facilities, by selected victim experiences, 2018 TABLE 1.5. Staff sexual misconduct in juvenile facilities, by selected victim experiences, 2018 Section 2: Most-serious incidents of sexual victimization TABLE 2.1. Perpetrator characteristics in most-serious incidents of youth-on-youth sexual victimization involving force or coercion in juvenile facilities, 2018 TABLE 2.2. Incident characteristics of most-serious incidents of youth-on-youth sexual victimization involving force or coercion in juvenile facilities, 2018 TABLE 2.3a. Sex of perpetrator and use of force or coercion in most-serious incidents of staff sexual misconduct in juvenile facilities, 2018 TABLE 2.3b.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Definitions of Child Abuse and Neglect
    STATE STATUTES Current Through March 2019 WHAT’S INSIDE Defining child abuse or Definitions of Child neglect in State law Abuse and Neglect Standards for reporting Child abuse and neglect are defined by Federal Persons responsible for the child and State laws. At the State level, child abuse and neglect may be defined in both civil and criminal Exceptions statutes. This publication presents civil definitions that determine the grounds for intervention by Summaries of State laws State child protective agencies.1 At the Federal level, the Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment To find statute information for a Act (CAPTA) has defined child abuse and neglect particular State, as "any recent act or failure to act on the part go to of a parent or caregiver that results in death, https://www.childwelfare. serious physical or emotional harm, sexual abuse, gov/topics/systemwide/ or exploitation, or an act or failure to act that laws-policies/state/. presents an imminent risk of serious harm."2 1 States also may define child abuse and neglect in criminal statutes. These definitions provide the grounds for the arrest and prosecution of the offenders. 2 CAPTA Reauthorization Act of 2010 (P.L. 111-320), 42 U.S.C. § 5101, Note (§ 3). Children’s Bureau/ACYF/ACF/HHS 800.394.3366 | Email: [email protected] | https://www.childwelfare.gov Definitions of Child Abuse and Neglect https://www.childwelfare.gov CAPTA defines sexual abuse as follows: and neglect in statute.5 States recognize the different types of abuse in their definitions, including physical abuse, The employment, use, persuasion, inducement, neglect, sexual abuse, and emotional abuse.
    [Show full text]
  • To Support and Defend Against Sexual Misconduct: Calling On
    "To Support and Defend" Against Sexual Misconduct: Calling on Future Military Leaders to Bridge the Cultural Divide Janine P. Felsman* "I. do solemnly swear .. that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same . .. and that I will well andfaithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter .... ". I. INTRODUCTION After four years of dedication and training at the United States military service academies [MSAs], the young women and men of these prestigious academies will take an oath to support and defend the Constitution. They step forward as commissioned military officers, assuming a duty of service to our Nation. As the military's newest leaders, they also inherit a decades-long battle with a silent, pernicious enemy-the sexual victimization of military members perpetrated by their comrades-in-arms. * Lieutenant Colonel, Judge Advocate, United States Army. Currently assigned as Assistant Professor, Department of Law, United States Military Academy [USMA] at West Point, New York. The views expressed herein are comprised of the author's personal views only and not intended to represent the official position of the Department of Defense, the United States Army, the USMA, or any other department or agency of the United States government. 1 5 U.S.C. § 3331 (1966); see also U.S. CONST. art. VI, cl. 3. ("[A]ll executive and judicial officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution.").
    [Show full text]
  • 61462 Federal Register / Vol
    61462 Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 230 / Thursday, November 29, 2018 / Proposed Rules DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION text format. Please do not submit the recipients understand their legal PDF in a scanned format. Using a print- obligations including what conduct is 34 CFR Part 106 to-PDF format allows the U.S. actionable as sexual harassment under [Docket ID ED–2018–OCR–0064] Department of Education (the Title IX, the conditions that activate a Department) to electronically search and mandatory response by the recipient, RIN 1870–AA14 copy certain portions of your and particular requirements that such a submissions. response must meet so that recipients Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Sex D Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to protect the rights of their students to in Education Programs or Activities www.regulations.gov to submit your access education free from sex Receiving Federal Financial comments electronically. Information discrimination. Assistance on using Regulations.gov, including In addition to providing recipients AGENCY: Office for Civil Rights, instructions for finding a rule on the site with clear legal obligations, the Department of Education. and submitting comments, is available transparency of the proposed ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking. on the site under ‘‘How to use regulations will help empower students Regulations.gov’’ in the Help section. to hold their schools accountable for SUMMARY: The Secretary of Education D Postal Mail, Commercial Delivery, failure to meet those obligations. Under proposes to amend regulations or Hand Delivery: The Department the proposed regulations, complainants implementing Title IX of the Education strongly encourages commenters to reporting sexual harassment will have Amendments of 1972 (Title IX).
    [Show full text]
  • Rape Myths, Assumptions, and Stereotypes Are Harmful and Hinder Our Society from Effectively Dealing with and Eradicating Sexual Violence
    Rape Myths, assumptions, and stereotypes are harmful and hinder our society from effectively dealing with and eradicating sexual violence. Listed below are some of the most common ‘myths’ about sexual violence with information on the facts of this very serious subject. 1. Myth: Some people ‘ask for it’ by dressing provocatively or drinking too much. Fact: No one ‘asks’ for sexual assault or deserves to be sexually assaulted. The way a person dresses, how much they drink, or if they use drugs – this does not mean that a person gives up the right to say what happens to their body. 2. Myth: Some men just can’t help themselves if the girl is really beautiful and sexy. Fact: This type of thinking is just downright wrong and harmful for a variety of reasons. This type of myth supposes that men have no way of controlling themselves as well as assuming wrongly that sexual assault is about lust and attraction. Make no mistake, sexual assault is an act of violence and aggression; sexual assault is less motivated by attraction and more motivated by the feeling that someone needs to exert power and control over another. These types of myths also assume wrongly that sexual assault is always perpetrated by a male upon a female. 3. Myth: Sexual assault is committed by men upon female victims. Fact: Sexual assault can be committed by any gender identity upon any other gender identity. Sexual assault can happen to any person regardless of gender identity or sexual orientation/identity. 4. Myth: If people would just avoid ‘dangerous areas’ then they wouldn’t need to worry about being sexually assaulted.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigating and Prosecuting Law Enforcement Sexual Misconduct Cases Fara Gold Special Litigation Counsel Criminal Section Civil Rights Division I
    Investigating and Prosecuting Law Enforcement Sexual Misconduct Cases Fara Gold Special Litigation Counsel Criminal Section Civil Rights Division I. Introduction Those who commit crimes involving sexual misconduct exploit the disparate power dynamic between victim and offender, be it teacher and student, producer and actor, coach and athlete, or law enforcement officer and arrestee, probationer, or inmate. By wielding weapons of authority, in the many forms that may take, the perpetrator leaves the victim with little choice but to submit to his actions and stay quiet in the aftermath, fearing that no one will believe her and everyone will blame her.1 This is especially true in the law enforcement context, where victims are usually in the custody of their offender, have a history of criminal activity, and whose status in life lowers their credibility in the eyes of those that might judge them. After all, who is going to believe a victim with such a background when it is a criminal’s word, alleged or otherwise, against an officer, who has a badge and a gun, and who has sworn to uphold the Constitution? In short, such an individual is the perfect victim against whom to commit a crime and get away with it. Investigators and prosecutors therefore have to take care not to immediately discount the account of such victims without further investigation. To be sure, most law enforcement officers serve their communities honorably. However, for those that do not, the federal government has jurisdiction to prosecute law enforcement officers who commit sexual misconduct under 18 U.S.C.
    [Show full text]
  • INHUMAN TARGETS: Psychopathy, Dehumanization, and Sexist And
    INHUMAN TARGETS: Psychopathy, Dehumanization, and Sexist and Violent Attitudes Towards Women by TABITHA METHOT-JONES A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy Department of Psychology BROCK UNIVERSITY St. Catharines, ON December 2019 © Tabitha Methot-Jones, 2019 Dedication I dedicate this thesis to my family and friends, without your love and support none of this would have been possible. i Abstract The current work presents three studies that examined the role of dehumanization in the association between psychopathy and sexist and violent attitudes towards women. This program had two overarching goals in examining psychopathy, dehumanization, and sexist and violent attitudes towards women. The first goal was to examine whether an indirect association between psychopathy and negative attitudes towards women existed through dehumanization. The second goal was to explore if, by introducing information that humanizes women, levels of dehumanization could be mitigated for individuals high on psychopathic traits. Employing mixed samples for both studies (student and community), Study 1 (n = 514) and Study 2 (n = 202) provided evidence that psychopathy demonstrated an indirect relationship with sexist and violent attitudes towards women via dehumanization. Study 2 also expanded on Study 1 by including a behavioural measure of violent attitudes towards women. Finally, Study 3 (n = 206), again using a mixed sample, attempted to manipulate dehumanization to see if it, and the sexist and violent attitudes associated with it, would be mitigated. Unfortunately, the manipulation failed, but we were able to use the data from Study 3 to provide a replication of the results of Study 2.
    [Show full text]
  • University of Alaska Students' Disclosures of Sexual Misconduct and Sexual Assault Victimizations
    University of Alaska Students’ Disclosures of Sexual Misconduct and Sexual Assault Victimizations Item Type Article Authors Myrstol, Brad A.; Blumenstein, Lindsey Citation Myrstol, Brad A.; & Blumenstein, Lindsey. (2016). "University of Alaska Students’ Disclosures of Sexual Misconduct and Sexual Assault Victimizations." Alaska Justice Forum 33(1): 1, 11–16 (Spring 2016). Publisher Justice Center, University of Alaska Anchorage Download date 24/09/2021 21:59:05 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/11122/7020 ALASKA JUSTICE FORUM A PUBLICATION OF THE JUSTICE CENTER Spring 2016 UNIVERSITY of ALASKA ANCHORAGE Vol. 33, No. 1 University of Alaska Students’ Disclosures of Sexual Misconduct and Sexual Assault Victimizations Brad A. Myrstol and Lindsey Blumenstein to disclose their victimization to others, with 2015, has someone attempted or succeeded In a recent Alaska Justice Statistical whom did they share their experiences? (3) in having nonconsensual or unwanted sexual Analysis Center (AJSAC) Fact Sheet issue Did the likelihood of sexual violence dis- contact with you under any circumstances (available at www.uaa.alaska.edu/ajsac) we closure vary signifi cantly according to UA (on or off campus), or do you suspect some- published initial fi ndings from the University students’ demographic characteristics (age, one did?” of Alaska Campus Climate Survey, a re- race/ethnicity, sex/gender)? Every survey respondent was provided search study funded by the U.S. Department This article uses the data collected for the following examples of sexual assault:
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the AAU Campus Climate Survey on Sexual Assault and Misconduct the University of Pennsylvania
    Report on the AAU Campus Climate Survey on Sexual Assault and Misconduct The University of Pennsylvania Authors David Cantor, Westat Gail Thomas, Westat Bonnie Fisher, University of Cincinnati Hyunshik Lee, Westat Susan Chibnall, Westat Vanessa Kranz, Westat Shauna Harps, Westat Randy Herbison, Westat Reanne Townsend, Westat Kristin Madden, Westat September 16, 2019 Prepared for: Prepared by: The University of Pennsylvania Westat Philadelphia, Pennsylvania An Employee-Owned Research Corporation® (City, State) 1600 Research Boulevard Rockville, Maryland 20850-3129 (301) 251-1500 Contents Sections Page Acknowledgments ..................................................................................................... viii 1. Introduction ........................................................................................... 1 2. Methodology .......................................................................................... 2 2.1 Designing the 2019 Instrument ................................................. 2 2.2 Survey Content and Mode of Administration ............................ 3 2.3 Sample ........................................................................................ 4 2.4 Survey Procedures ..................................................................... 4 2.5 Response Rates .......................................................................... 4 2.6 Brief Description of the Weighting Procedure for The University of Pennsylvania ......................................................... 5 3. Survey Results
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Policy on Sexual and Gender-Based Misconduct
    THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN INTERIM POLICY ON SEXUAL AND GENDER-BASED MISCONDUCT Effective August 14, 2020 The University of Michigan Interim Policy On Sexual and Gender-Based Misconduct Table of Contents Effective August 14, 2020 I. POLICY STATEMENT 1 II. POLICY DEFINITIONS 2 III. POLICY SCOPE AND APPLICABILITY 5 IV. APPLICABLE PROCEDURES UNDER THIS POLICY 6 V. CONFIDENTIAL AND NON-CONFIDENTIAL RESOURCES 6 A. Confidential Resources ........................................................................................... 7 B. Non-Confidential Resources ................................................................................... 9 VI. REPORTING 10 A. Reporting to the University ................................................................................... 10 1. Contact the Office for Institutional Equity and Title IX Coordinator ...... 10 2. Reports to Individuals with Reporting Obligations .................................. 11 3. Anonymous Reporting .............................................................................. 12 B. Reporting to Law Enforcement ............................................................................. 13 C. Receipt by the University of Reports of Prohibited Conduct ............................... 14 D. Additional Information about Reporting .............................................................. 14 1. Time Frame for Reporting an Incident to the University ......................... 14 2. Information on Amnesty to Students When Reporting Prohibited Conduct to the University .......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Preventing and Responding to Corrections-Based Sexual Abuse: a Guide for Community Corrections Professionals
    Preventing and Responding to Corrections-Based Sexual Abuse: A Guide for Community Corrections Professionals Preventing And Responding to Corrections-Based Sexual Abuse: A Guide For Community Corrections Professionals December 2009 American Probation and Parole Association With The International Community Corrections Association And Pretrial Justice Institute Through funding from the Bureau of Justice Assistance, U.S. Department of Justice ii Preventing and Responding to Corrections-Based Sexual Abuse: A Guide for Community Corrections Professionals iii Preventing and Responding to Corrections-Based Sexual Abuse: A Guide for Community Corrections Professionals Author Carrie E. Abner with Jane Browning John Clark Project Staff American Probation and Parole Association Carl Wicklund Executive Director Carrie Abner Research Associate Lisa Ginter Administrative Assistant John R. Higgins Creative Design and Layout International Community Corrections Association Jane Browning Executive Director Pretrial Justice Institute John Clark Director of Technical Assistance Bureau of Justice Assistance Project Manager Julius Dupree Policy Advisor iv Preventing and Responding to Corrections-Based Sexual Abuse: A Guide for Community Corrections Professionals ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This document draws on the ideas and expertise of many individuals across the country who graciously committed their time and efforts to assist in its development. The American Probation and Parole Association (APPA) would like to thank Jane Browning (International Community Corrections Association) and John Clark (Pretrial Justice Institute) in particular for their many contributions as project partners. This project would not have been possible without their tireless efforts to assist in conceptualizing, drafting, reviewing, and revising the guidebook. In addition, APPA would like to thank the members of the Working Group on the Prison Rape Elimination Act & Community Corrections, who greatly contributed to the drafting and review of the guidebook.
    [Show full text]
  • Educator Sexual Misconduct: a Synthesis of Existing Literature
    POLICY AND PROGRAM STUDIES SERVICE Educator Sexual Misconduct: A Synthesis of Existing Literature 2004 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY DOC # 2004-09 Educator Sexual Misconduct: A Synthesis of Existing Literature Prepared for the U.S. Department of Education Office of the Under Secretary Policy and Program Studies Service By Charol Shakeshaft Hofstra University and Interactive, Inc. Huntington, N.Y. 2 This report was prepared for the U.S. Department of Education under Purchase Order ED-02-PO-3281. The views expressed herein are those of the authors. No official endorsement by the U.S. Department of Education is intended or should be inferred. U.S. Department of Education Rod Paige Secretary June 2004 This report is in the public domain. Authorization to reproduce it in whole or in part is granted. While permission to reprint this publication is not necessary, the citation should be: U.S. Department of Education, Office of the Under Secretary, Educator Sexual Misconduct: A Synthesis of Existing Literature, Washington, D.C., 2004. CONTENTS 1.0 Purpose and Methods of Synthesis 1 1.1 Definitions 1.2 Scope of synthesis search 1.3 Methods of synthesis 2.0 Description of Existing Research, Literature, or Other Verifiable Sources 4 2.1 Categories of discourse 2.2 Systematic studies 2.3 Practice-based accounts with first or third person descriptions 2.4 Newspaper and other media sources 2.5 General child sexual abuse data sets and instruments 2.6 Availability of research 3.0 Prevalence of Educator Sexual Misconduct 16
    [Show full text]
  • Prison Rape Elimination Act (Prea) Definitions
    PRISON RAPE ELIMINATION ACT (PREA) DEFINITIONS Sexual misconduct includes offender-on-offender sexual assault, sexual abuse, sexual harassment, and consensual sex acts. It also includes staff-on-offender sexual harassment, staff sexual misconduct, and staff misconduct of a sexual nature. Staff include Department employees, volunteers, contract personnel, and any other person providing services in Department facilities or offices. The following definitions are applicable to Department policies relating to sexual misconduct: A. Offender-on-Offender Sexual Misconduct is an incident in which one or more offenders are engaged in, are attempting to engage in, or have completed a consensual sexual act with another offender. B. Offender-on-Offender Sexual Assault is an incident in which one or more of the following acts occurs between 2 or more offenders without an offender's consent or when an offender is unable to consent or refuse: 1. Contact between genitalia (i.e., penis, vagina) or between genitalia and the anus involving penetration, however slight. This does not include kicking, grabbing, or punching genitals when the intent is to harm or debilitate rather than sexually exploit. 2. Contact between the mouth and the penis, vagina, or anus. 3. Penetration of the anal or genital opening of another person by a hand, finger, or other object. C. Offender-on-Offender Sexual Abuse includes sexual contact between 2 or more offenders without an offender's consent or when an offender is unable to consent or refuse, including intentional touching, either directly or through the clothing, of the genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner thigh, or buttocks of the victim.
    [Show full text]