<<

Drug Discovery & Development

Neal G. Simon, Ph.D. Professor Department of Biological Sciences Discovery & Development: Bench, Bedside, & Beyond

I. Background

II. The R&D Landscape

III. Innovation and Transformation

IV. The Process

V. Case Study: A Novel Antidepressant

VI. Ethical Issues: Money, Data, & Politics Disclaimer

“Those who have knowledge, don’t predict. Those who predict, don’t have knowledge.” Lao Tzu, 6th Century BC Chinese Poet Serendipity or Good Science: Building Opportunity

Hoffman Osterloh I. Background Drug Development Process: Stages

US FDA Drug Development Process: Phases

Biopharmaceutical Drug Development: Attrition

Drug FDA Large Scale Discovery Pre-Clinical Clinical Trials Review Manufacturing / Phase IV

Phase I Phase III 20-100 1000-5000 Volunteers Volunteers

10,000 1 FDA Com- 250 Compounds 5 Compounds Approved pounds Drug IND Submitted Submitted NDA Phase II 100-500 Volunteers

5 years 1.5 years 6 years 2 years 2 years

Quelle: Burrell Report Biotechnology Industry 2006 II. The Research & Development Landscape New Chemical Entities: R&D Cost Model

Discovery: $263/$824 million Development: $632/1054 million

Paul et al (2010). Nature Rev Annual Private & Public R&D Spending Research & Development Spending: Return on Investment

Saltzmann (2009). Feeding the Pipeline III. Innovation & Transformation

Innovation Models and Transformation

Hu et al (2007)

Antidepressants: Me Too

1986 Fluvoxamine (Luvox; Solvay) SSRI

1987 Fluoxetine (Prozac; Lilly) SSRI

1992 Sertraline (Zoloft; Pfizer) SSRI/NRI

1993 Venlafaxine (Effexor; Wyeth) SSRI/NRI

1996 Buproprion (Wellbutrin; Wyeth) SNRI/DRI

2002 Escitalopram (Lexapro; Forrest) SSRI

2004 Duloxetine (Cymbalta; Lilly) SSRI/NRI

2008 Desvenlafaxine (Pristiq; Wyeth/Pfizer) SNRI

2011 Vilazidone (Vybrid; Forest Labs) SSRI/5HT1a

Personalized Medicine (sort of)

Discovery & Preclinical Development

IV. Discovery & Development Preclinical Development

Lead Selection and Drug Candidate Preclinical Drug

Optimization (iterative) Confirmation Characterization RegulatorySubmission to FDA

Efficacy Assessment: Does it work?

ADME Profiling: How can it be delivered and what does the body do?

Toxicology/Safety Assessment: Is it safe?

Pharmaceutics: Is the manufacture viable and controllable?

Adapted from TetraQ Stage 1: Lead Selection and Optimization

Essential Pharmaceutics

• Structural Characterization • Impurity Identification • Solubility assessment • Prototype formulation • Stability testing

Screening Efficacy Early Toxicology Early ADME

• In silico profiling • Off target screen • In vitro models • Develop simple • In vitro cytotoxicity • In vivo models analytical method • Preliminary AMES • Other • Measure membrane • hERG binding permeability • Plasma Stability

Adapted from TetraQ Stage 2: Drug Candidate Confirmation

Data from Lead Optimization Stage

Preliminary CMC “Benchmark” in Preliminary (Chemistry, ADME Profiling Manufacture and vivo Models Toxicology Control)

• Optimized • Formulation for analytical • Maximum GLP Toxicology method tolerated dose • Stability testing • In vivo models development (MTD) of active • Validated • Basic pharma- • Repeat Dose ingredient models cokinetics (PK) (non-GLP) • Detailed • Models in other & Oral • Preliminary physicochemical disease areas Bioavailability Cardiovascular characterization • Determine Safety • Impurity of Pharmacology analysis drug

Adapted from TetraQ Stage 3: Preclinical Drug Characteristics

Data from Prior Stages

Detailed Preclinical Comprehensive GLP Toxicology CMC ADME Package

• analytical method • acute study • ICH Stability development • subchronic repeat Testing • Comprehensive dose study • ICH impurity • Genotoxicity analysis • GLP TK Battery •Develop prototype • Comprehensive • Safety clinical formulation identification of Pharmacology metabolites

Regulatory Submission to FDA or Presentation to Pharmaceutical Company

Adapted from TetraQ

V. Case Study: Agomelatine

Major Depression: Symptoms

 Anhedonia

 Blunted Affect

 Disturbed Sleep

 Weight Gain/Weight Loss

 Compromised Social Interactions The Scream Fear Circuits: Core Components

Hippocampus and Amygdala

Anterior & Rostral Cingulate Cortex

Insular Cortex

Edvard Munch, 1893 Shin & Liberzon (2010) Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis

Biological Sciences Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenal Axis

Key Considerations

 Regulatory Peptides . CRF . AVP

 Feedback Regulation . Glucocorticoids

 Biorhythm Disturbance . Sleep .Temperature . Cardiac . HPA axis

Biological Sciences Major Depression & Biorhythms

 Alterations in circadian rhythms of behavior, sleep, core temperature and the secretion of cortisol and other hormones

 Blunted amplitude of daily rhythms and poor responsiveness to environmental entraining stimuli.

 Circadian desynchronization may also be triggered by disorganization of the suprachiasmatic nucleus

 Circadian disturbances may be provoked by an abnormal pineal output of melatonin, a key synchronizer of biological rhythms and sleep

 Depression is associated with an altered diurnal rhythm of melatonin output, including a blunted night time surge

 Administration of melatonin itself is ineffective in major depression

 Re-coordination of biological rhythms by recruitment of melatonergic mechanisms may be a therapeutically relevant strategy for improving depressed states. Melatonin, Circadian Rhythms, & Agomelatine

Agomelatine: Mechanism of Action

Discovery, Development, Characterization, & Approval of Agomelatine

Key Pharmacological Observations

V. Ethics Neurontin

PFIZER LOSES A ROUND OVER MARKETING OF NEURONTIN By BLOOMBERG NEWS A judge in Boston upheld a jury decision that Pfizer illegally promoted Neurontin for unapproved uses. Pfizer said it would appeal. January 29, 2011

EXPERTS CONCLUDE PFIZER MANIPULATED STUDIES By STEPHANIE SAUL The drug maker manipulated the publication of studies to bolster use of its epilepsy drug Neurontin, according to expert witnesses in a lawsuit against the company. Oct 8, 2008

PFIZER TO PAY $430 MILLION OVER PROMOTING DRUG TO DOCTORS By GARDINER HARRIS Pfizer pleads guilty and agrees to pay $430 million to resolve criminal and civil charges that it paid doctors to prescribe epilepsy drug Neurontin to patients with ailments that drug was not federally approved to treat. May 14, 2004 Politics, Medicine, & Responsibility

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPZn9mRQlq4 Serendipity or Good Science: Building Opportunity

Hoffman Osterhloh Thank you for your time and attention