DOCSLIB.ORG

Freedom Site Chart

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Title & URL Author Date Date Date Summary Screenshot Published Viewed Archived Appendix # What is Anti-Semitism? Philip N.D. June 5, May 8, 2019 - Argues that anti-Semitism is a natural 1 – 6 https://wayback.archive- Belgrave 2019 feeling and one that is well it.org/227/20171106023417 documented throughout history and /http://www.freedomsite.org fiction (points to Jewish villains in /colum/belgrave1.html Dickens & Shakespeare) - States that Jewish people were not the ‘principal sufferers’ of the Holocaust, but the most powerful of the groups victimized (Appendix 3 & 5) - States that it is immoral and dangerous to ignore the “Jewish Problem” (Appendix 6) Nazi Loot Philip N.D. June 5, May 8, 2019 - Argues that the “Holocaust Industry” 7 – 9 https://wayback.archive- Belgrave 2019 is “ripping off” banks and art galleries it.org/227/20171106023416 through law-suits and /http://www.freedomsite “moralizing” (Appendix 7) .org/colum/belgrave2.html - Refers to the Holocaust as a myth and states that Holocaust survivor Elie Wiesel is a false witness (Appendix 8) - Expresses concern over Ian Lumsden, of the Beaverbrook Art Gallery, having to apologize for using the term “Nazi Loot” (Appendix 7 & 9) An Eye for an Eye Doug July 21, June 5, May 8, 2019 - Provides a very brief overview of John 10 – 13 https://wayback.archive- Collins 2000 2019 Sack’s book An Eye for an Eye: The it.org/227/20171106021910 Untold Story of Jewish Revenge /http://www.freedomsite Against Germans in 1945 .org/colum/collins16.html - Argues that the current public understanding of the Holocaust is a result of media colluding with Jewish people (Appendix 11) - Recounts details from Sack’s novel that state that Jewish people got revenge on Germans through graphic acts of violence, resulting in a ‘second Holocaust’ (Appendix 13) The Latest in Holocaust Promajorit N.D. June 6, May 8, 2019 - States that the “Holocaust Industry” 14 – 18 Mania y 2019 has been growing and gaining energy https://wayback.archive- and momentum (Appendix 14) it.org - Cites wrestler Bill Goldberg refusing /227/20171106022741 to wrestle in Germany, as well as /http://www.freedomsite.org other Holocaust remembrance events /colum/promajority6.html at schools in order to “brainwash children” (Appendix 15 & 16) - Valorizes Holocaust denier Philip Belgrave as a ‘revisionist’ and a ‘Catholic Activist’ who critiques the ‘Holocaust Industry’ – similarly valorizes Doug Christie, Ernst Zundel, James Keegstra, and Malcom Ross (Appendix 17 & 18) The Tale of Two Genocides Promajorit N.D. June 6, May 8, 2019 - Expresses concern over the 19 – 22 https://wayback.archive- y 2019 imprisonment in Germany of Dr. it.org Fredric Toben because of his denial of /227/20171106022957 the use of gas chambers during the /http://www.freedomsite.org Holocaust (Appendix 19) /colum/promajority3.html - Argues that the Holocaust requires more scrutiny and should held to similar standards as the inquiry into the genocide in Kosovo (Appendix 20 & 21) - Argues that the ‘Holocaust Lobby’ is responsible for lack of investigation into the Holocaust (Appendix 22) Immigration and the Election Doug Oct. 30, June 6, May 8, 2019 - States that ‘White Canada’ is being 23 – 26 https://wayback.archive- Collins 2000 2019 replaced by ‘Anything/Nothing it.org/227/20171106021840 Canada’ (Appendix 24) /http://www.freedomsite.org - States that Ottawa is welcoming /colum/collins25.html ‘criminals’ from different countries, and that anyone who questions this is brushed off as racist (Appendix 25) - Provides headlines which focus on crimes committed by Vietnamese people, Tamil people, and Sri Lankan people (Appendix 26) A Word in Favour of Doug June 25, June 6, May 8 2019 - Argues that people on the right need 27 – 28 Extremism Collins 2001 2019 too become more extreme in their https://wayback.archive- beliefs like neo-Nazi Paul Fromm, or it.org/227/20171106020941 be more open with the extreme /http://www.freedomsite beliefs they already hold (Appendix .org/colum/collins46.html 27) - States that the ‘immigration scam’ has allowed increased crime, criminals, and terrorists into the country (Appendix 28) Marc Lemire files complaint Marc March 28, June 9, May 8, 2019 - Marc Lemire confirms he was present 31 – 33 against Toronto Police for Lemire 2009 2019 at 2009 speech by anti-immigrant and thuggish arrest of Non- convicted criminal Brad Love in Violent Letter Writer Toronto with neo-Nazi Paul https://wayback.archive- Fromm. Lemire continued to it.org/227/20190508183352 participate in the hate movement and /http://www.freedomsite.org files a complaint with the Toronto /legal/ Police about the arrest of Love for a mar28-09_lemire_complains probation violation (Appendix 31 & _to_ 32) tps_re_brad_love.html - Witness statement from Paul Fromm states that immigrants are criminals and should be the real focus of police scrutiny (Appendix 33) Kingston Police Harass Marc March 23, June 9, May 8, 2019 - Lemire attacks the Kingston Police 34 – 35 FreeDominion Website: Are Lemire 2009 2019 Service for having contacted an online Police to become moderators forum host friend of his about threats of political message boards? of violence from one of their users What's next, a license? (Appendix 34 & 35) https://wayback.archive- it.org/227/20190508204345 /http://blog.freedomsite.org /2009/03/kingston-police- harass-freedominion.html Criminal Complaint against Marc N.D. June 9, May 8, 2019 - Lemire talking about a nonsensical 36 CHRC: Evidence leads to the Lemire 2019 criminal complaint he filed against USA, where the RCMP can’t the Canadian Human Rights follow up Commission alleging that an employee https://wayback.archive- miraculously hacked into the it.org/227/20190508184116 password protected wifi of a person /http://www.freedomsite.org several buildings away in order simply /legal/ to access wifi services that could have nov21-08_RCMP_criminal_ been accessed from the corner coffee complaint_against_CHRC.ht shop - this calls into question not just ml Lemire’s waste of police resources with a vexatious complaint, but also his technical knowledge (Appendix 36) CHRC Wants to BAN Humour. Marc Sept. 19, June 9, May 8, - Lemire claims the Canadian Human 37 Look Out the CHRC Joke Lemire 2008 2019 2019 Rights Commission wants to “BAN Police are trolling for Jokes Humour” and jokes - Lemire is that are "Not Funny" actually talking about material that https://wayback.archive- was submitted from his freedomsite it.org/227/20190508205159 website in the human rights complaint /http://blog.freedomsite.org against him - the “jokes” sections /2008/09/chrc-wants-to-ban- included sections for “nigger jokes”, humour-look-out-chrc.html “nigger and a Jew jokes” and “wetback and spic jokes” (Appendix 37) Can you spot the "Hate"? The Marc Aug. 15, June 9, May 8, 2019 - Lemire republishes an article from his 38 – 40 CHRC claims this article by Lemire 2008 2019 website by Holocaust-denier Doug WWII war hero Doug Collins Collins that decries the laws to "exposes Jews to hatred or control Holocaust denial, whines that contempt" it’s not acceptable to claim that https://wayback.archive- “immigrants can destroy your it.org/227/20190508205515 country”, then lauds various /http://blog.freedomsite.org Holocaust-deniers and complains /2008/08/can-you-spot-hate- about them being held liable for their chrc-claims-this.html unlawful conduct in their various countries (Appendix 38 – 40) Canadian Jewish groups join Marc Feb. 26, June 9, May 8, 2019 - Lemire complains bitterly that three 41 – 42 censorship brigade to Lemire 2006 2019 national Canadian Jewish groups have silence Marc Lemire and applied for intervenor status in the Freedomsite human rights case against him and https://wayback.archive- that they had previously participated it.org/227/20190508191117 in the human rights case against his /http://www.freedomsite.org former employer, Holocaust-denier /legal/ and national security threat Ernst feb6-06_jewish_groups_inte Zundel (Appendix 41 & 42) rvene.html Bnai Brith: "Hate Speech" Wally Sept. 6, June 9, May 8, 2019 - States that ‘political Judaism’ is 43 – 44 Hypocrisy, and a great letter Keeler 2008 2019 taking advantage of the CHRC based in response to Bnai Brith on the number of human rights https://wayback.archive- complaints filed by Jewish groups and it.org/227/20190508225014/ individuals (Appendix 43) http://blog.freedomsite.org/ - States that human rights commissions 2008/09/bnai-brith-hate- are inherently dangerous and speech-hypocrisy-and.html ‘contaminating’ (Appendix 44) LEISHMAN: Abolish human Rory Sept. 13, June 9, May 8, 2019 - Argues that Muslim people bringing 45 – 46 rights censorship powers Leishman 2018 2019 forward human rights complaints https://wayback.archive- based on Islamophobia is actually it.org/227/20190508224934/ harmful to Muslim people because it http://blog.freedomsite.org/ threatens their fundamental freedoms 2008/09/leishman-abolish- (Appendix 45) human-rights.html - States that homosexuals cannot be competent parents – stating that no studies have found that homosexuals can competently raise children (Appendix 46) Are Whites not an Marc Feb. 25, June 9, May 8, 2019 - States that the CHRC has been 47 – 48 Identifiable Group? Lemire 2009 2019 discriminating against white Ahenakew Crown Prosecutor Canadians because ‘white people’ are Sandeep Bains seems to not considered an Identifiable Group think so (The Anti-White (Appendix 47) Double Standard) - States that those who claim that https://wayback.archive- others are racist, are racist it.org/227/20190508192627/
Recommended publications
  • 2.3 Holocaust Denial

    2.3 Holocaust Denial

    nm u Ottawa L'Universite eanadienne Canada's university mn FACULTE DES ETUDES SUPERIEURES 1=^1 FACULTY OF GRADUATE AND ET POSTOCTORALES U Ottawa POSDOCTORAL STUDIES L'Universite eanadienne Canada's university Johny-Angel Butera AUTEUR DE LA THESE / AUTHOR OF THESIS M.A. (Criminology) GRADE/DEGREE Department of Criminology FACULTE, ECOLE, DEPARTEMENT / FACULTY, SCHOOL, DEPARTMENT Genocide Denial on the Internet: The Cases of Armenia and Rwanda TITRE DE LA THESE / TITLE OF THESIS Maritza Felices-Luna DIRECTEUR (DIRECTRICE) DE LA THESE / THESIS SUPERVISOR CO-DIRECTEUR (CO-DIRECTRICE) DE LA THESE /THESIS CO-SUPERVISOR Daniel dos Santos Valerie Steeves Gary W. Slater Le Doyen de la Faculte des etudes superieures et postdoctorales / Dean of the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies GENOCIDE DENIAL ON THE INTERNET: THE CASES OF ARMENIA AND RWANDA Johny-Angel Butera Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the MA degree in Criminology Department of Criminology Faculty of Social Sciences University of Ottawa © Johny-Angel Butera, Ottawa, Canada, 2010 Library and Archives Bibliotheque et 1*1 Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de I'edition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre r&terence ISBN: 978-0-494-73798-9 Our file Notre r6f6rence ISBN: 978-0-494-73798-9 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non­ L'auteur a accorde une licence non exclusive exclusive license
  • INSIDE CANADA's FAR RIGHT NETWORK, by Warren Kinsella (Toronto: Harpercollins Publishers, 1994)

    INSIDE CANADA's FAR RIGHT NETWORK, by Warren Kinsella (Toronto: Harpercollins Publishers, 1994)

    BOOK REVIEWS 835 WEB OF HATE: INSIDE CANADA'S FAR RIGHT NETWORK, by Warren Kinsella (Toronto: HarperCollins Publishers, 1994) [The antiscmite] is a man who is afraid ... of himself, of his conscience, his freedom, of his instincts, of his responsibilities, of solitude, of change, of society and the world ... Antisemitism, in a word, is fear of man's fate. The antisemite is the man who wants to be pitiless stone, furious torrent, devastating lightning: in short, everything but a man. 1 Warren Kinsella's message in Web of Hate'- is that racism is alive, well, and growing in Canada. Kinsella focuses on white men who hate. It is difficult to define those whom they hate: they hate all who are not like them; they hate people of colour and people who do not share their language or traditions; but, most of all, they hate the Jewish community. Anti-semiti~m seems to be the symbol of their racism, the banner under which they march. While Web of Hate should interest the general reader, it is, in many ways, a book for lawyers. Lawyers both historical 3 and contemporary 4 populate its pages. The book relates technical evidential issues that arose in hate crime trials, including a "present memory refreshed" issue in the trial of a Manitoba Klan leader; the qualification of an "expert" in the Keegstra trial; and a false distinction Doug Christie sought to draw in the Finta trial respecting the weight of testimony taken on oath and on affirmation. 5 Kinsella also poses the problem of adapting existing hate legislation and its enforcement to new computer technology, particularly to the transmission of hate literature by electronic mail from the United States to Canada.6 Despite its legal appeal, Web of Hate is primarily a work of journalism.
  • Holocaust-Denial Literature: a Fourth Bibliography

    Holocaust-Denial Literature: a Fourth Bibliography

    City University of New York (CUNY) CUNY Academic Works Publications and Research York College 2000 Holocaust-Denial Literature: A Fourth Bibliography John A. Drobnicki CUNY York College How does access to this work benefit ou?y Let us know! More information about this work at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu/yc_pubs/25 Discover additional works at: https://academicworks.cuny.edu This work is made publicly available by the City University of New York (CUNY). Contact: [email protected] Holocaust-Denial Literature: A Fourth Bibliography John A. Drobnicki This bibliography is a supplement to three earlier ones published in the March 1994, Decem- ber 1996, and September 1998 issues of the Bulletin of Bibliography. During the intervening time. Holocaust revisionism has continued to be discussed both in the scholarly literature and in the mainstream press, especially owing to the libel lawsuit filed by David Irving against Deb- orah Lipstadt and Penguin Books. The Holocaust deniers, who prefer to call themselves “revi- sionists” in an attempt to gain scholarly legitimacy, have refused to go away and remain as vocal as ever— Bradley R. Smith has continued to send revisionist advertisements to college newspapers (including free issues of his new publication. The Revisionist), generating public- ity for his cause. Holocaust-denial, which will be used interchangeably with Holocaust revisionism in this bib- liography, is a body of literature that seeks to “prove” that the Jewish Holocaust did not hap- pen. Although individual revisionists may have different motives and beliefs, they all share at least one point: that there was no systematic attempt by Nazi Germany to exterminate Euro- pean Jewry.
  • Why Won't the Australian Government Follow

    Why Won't the Australian Government Follow

    WHY WON’T THE AUSTRALIAN > GOVERNMENT FOLLOW CANADA’S LEAD ON FREE SPEECH? AARON LANE Research Fellow at the Institute of Public Affairs n a visit to Canada earlier this year, Prime Minister Tony Abbott praised Canada for being a longstanding friend of IAustralia that has always shared our commitment to democracy and liberty. So why won’t the Australian government follow Canada’s lead and completely repeal section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act? In June 2013, Canada repealed its section 13 of its Human Rights Act. This section made it unlawful to communicate, by phone or internet, ‘any material that is likely to expose a person or persons to hatred or contempt’ based on grounds of discrimination. (The prescribed grounds of discrimination included race, national or ethnic origin, colour, and religion.) A key problem with Canada’s section 13 of the provision is the use of the word ‘likely’ to have exposed somebody to ‘hatred of contempt’. Canadian Conservative MP, and sponsor of the repeal bill, Brian Storseth explains: This is a very subjective and unnecessarily vague definition, not AUGUST 2014 | IPA Review 11 IPA_21 Review July 2014 C2.indd 11 5/08/2014 6:17:02 PM R FREE SPEECH Volume 66 I 2 CONTINUED undermine the dignity and self- THE BATTLELINES WERE one of the narrowly defined legal worth of target group members DRAWN BETWEEN definitions that would be far more and, more generally, contribute to > THOSE WHO SOUGHT appropriate for this clause. This is disharmonious relations among TO PROMOTE GROUP where section 13 truly fails to make various racial and cultural and RIGHTS AND ENDORSED a distinction between real hate religious groups, as a result eroding STATE-CENSORSHIP, speech and what I often term as the tolerance and open-mindedness AND THOSE WHO ‘hurt speech’, or speech that is simply that must flourish in a multicultural SOUGHT TO DEFEND offensive.
  • Ilya Shapiro (D.C. Bar #489100) Counsel of Record Trevor Burrus (D.C

    Ilya Shapiro (D.C. Bar #489100) Counsel of Record Trevor Burrus (D.C

    Nos. 14-CV-101 / 14-CV-126 IN THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COURT OF APPEALS COMPETITIVE ENTERPRISE INSTITUTE, ET AL., Defendants-Appellants, and NATIONAL REVIEW, INC., Defendant-Appellant, v. MICHAEL E. MANN, PH.D, Plaintiff-Appellee. On Appeal from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia Civil Division, No. 2012 CA 008263 B BRIEF AMICUS CURIAE OF THE CATO INSTITUTE SUPPORTING PETITION FOR REHEARING Ilya Shapiro (D.C. Bar #489100) Counsel of Record Trevor Burrus (D.C. Bar#1048911) CATO INSTITUTE 1000 Mass. Ave., N.W. Washington, D.C. 20001 Tel: (202) 842-0200 Fax: (202) 842-3490 [email protected] Counsel for Amicus Curiae CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT The Cato Institute states that it has no parent companies, subsidiaries, or affiliates, and that it does not issue shares to the public. Dated: January 3, 2019 s/ Ilya Shapiro Ilya Shapiro i TABLE OF CONTENTS CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT ..................................... i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES ............................................................... iii INTEREST OF AMICUS CURIAE ....................................................... 1 ARGUMENT ........................................................................................ 2 I. DISAGREEMENT WITH OFFICIAL BODIES IS NOT EVIDENCE OF BAD FAITH ................................ 2 II. CALLS FOR INVESTIGATION, COMMONPLACE PEJORATIVE TERMS, AND ANALOGIES TO “NOTORIOUS” PERSONS CANNOT BE ACTIONABLE FOR LIBEL ........................................... 6 CONCLUSION ..................................................................................
  • The Role of Harm in the Criminalization of Plural Unions

    The Role of Harm in the Criminalization of Plural Unions

    Emory Law Journal Volume 64 Issue 6 Paper Symposium — Polygamous Unions? Charting the Contours of Marriage Law's Frontier 2015 The Loadstone Rock: The Role of Harm in the Criminalization of Plural Unions Jonathan Turley Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/elj Recommended Citation Jonathan Turley, The Loadstone Rock: The Role of Harm in the Criminalization of Plural Unions, 64 Emory L. J. 1905 (2015). Available at: https://scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/elj/vol64/iss6/7 This Articles & Essays is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Emory Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Emory Law Journal by an authorized editor of Emory Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. TURLEY GALLEYSPROOFS2 5/27/2015 2:10 PM THE LOADSTONE ROCK: THE ROLE OF HARM IN THE CRIMINALIZATION OF PLURAL UNIONS ∗ Jonathan Turley ABSTRACT In this Article, Professor Turley explores the concept of social harm in the context of two recent cases in the United States and Canada over the criminalization of polygamy. The cases not only resulted in sharply divergent conclusions in striking down and upholding such laws respectively, but they offered strikingly different views of the concept of harm in the regulation of private consensual relations. Professor Turley draws comparisons with the debate over morality laws between figures like Lord Patrick Devlin and H.L.A. Hart in the last century. Professor Turley argues that the legal moralism of figures like Devlin have returned in a different form as a type of “compulsive liberalism” that seeks limitations on speech and consensual conduct to combat sexism and other social ills.
  • Globalisation and Social Movements

    Globalisation and Social Movements

    Globalisation and social movements In the society a large number of changes have been brought about by efforts exerted by people individually and collectively. Such efforts have been called social movements. A social movement may, therefore, be defined as “a collectively acting with some continuity to promote or resist a change in the society or group of which it is a part. Social movement is the effort by an association to bring about a change in the society. A social movement may also be directed to resist a change. Some movements are directed to modify certain aspects of the existing social order whereas others may aim to change it completely. The former are called reform movements and the latter are known as revolutionary movements. Social movements may be of numerous kinds, such as religious movements, reform movements, or revolutionary movements. Social movements maybe distinguished with institutions: social movement is the effort by an association to bring about a change in the society. A social movement may also be directed to resist a change. Some movements are directed to modify certain aspects of the existing social order whereas others may aim to change it completely. The former are called reform movements and the latter are known as revolutionary movements. Social movements may be of numerous kinds, such as religious movements, reform movements, or revolutionary movements. Causes of social movements: The social unrest may be caused by the following factors: (i) Cultural Drifts: The society is undergoing constant changes. The values and behaviour are changing in all civilized societies. In the course of cultural drift most of the people develop new ideas.
  • Ronald Reagan in Memoriam

    Ronald Reagan in Memoriam

    Grand Valley State University ScholarWorks@GVSU Features Hauenstein Center for Presidential Studies 6-6-2004 Ronald Reagan in Memoriam Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/features Recommended Citation "Ronald Reagan in Memoriam" (2004). Features. Paper 91. http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/features/91 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Hauenstein Center for Presidential Studies at ScholarWorks@GVSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Features by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@GVSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Ronald Reagan In Memoriam - Hauenstein Center for Presidential Studies - Grand Valley... Page 1 of 32 Ronald Reagan In Memoriam Ronald Reagan In Memoriam Our 40th president's life, career, death, and funeral are recalled in this Hauenstein Center focus. Detroit Free Press A Milliken Republican was driven to honor Reagan Column By Dawson Bell - Detroit Free Press (June 14, 2004) "The Michigan Republican Party Jerry Roe served as executive director in the 1970s wasn't exactly ground zero in the Reagan Revolution." FULL TEXT One thing's for sure, he kept to the script Column By Rochelle Riley - Detroit Free Press (June 11, 2004) "He took on his greatest acting role, as president of the United States, in a sweeping epic drama about one national superpower making itself stronger while growing tired of a second nipping at its heels with waning threats of nuclear annihilation." FULL TEXT Media do not tell the truth about Reagan Column By Leonard Pitts Jr. - Detroit Free Press (June 11, 2004) "Philadelphia, a speck of a town north and east of Jackson, is infamous as the place three young civil rights workers were murdered in 1964 for registering black people to vote.
  • Armenian Genocide Memorials in North America

    Armenian Genocide Memorials in North America

    Mashriq & Mahjar 4, no. 1 (2017),59-85 ISSN 2169-4435 Laura Robson MEMORIALIZATION AND ASSIMILATION: ARMENIAN GENOCIDE MEMORIALS IN NORTH AMERICA Abstract The Armenian National Institute lists forty-flve Armenian genocide memorials in the United States and five more in Canada. Nearly all were built after 1980, with a significant majority appearing only after 2000. These memorials, which represent a considerable investment of time, energy, and money on the part of diasporic Armenian communities across the continent, followed quite deliberately on the pattern and rhetoric of the public Jewish American memorialization of the Holocaust that began in the 19705. They tend to represent the Armenian diasporic story in toto as one of violent persecution, genocide, and rehabilitation within a white American immigrant sphere, with the purpose of projecting and promoting a fundamentally recognizable story about diaspora integration and accomplishment. This article argues that the decision publicly to represent the Armenian genocide as parallel to the Holocaust served as a mode of assimilation by attaching diaspora histories to an already­ recognized narrative of European Jewish immigrant survival and assimilation, but also by disassociating Armenians from Middle Eastern diaspora communities facing considerable public backlash after the Iranian hostage crisis of 1980 and again after September 11,2001. INTRODUCTION For decades after the Armenian genocide, memorialization of the event and its victims remained essentially private among the large Armenian diaspora communities in the United States. But in the 1970s and 1980s, Armenian Americans began to undertake campaigns to fund and build public memorial sites honoring the victims and bringing public attention to the genocide.
  • Do Republican Presidential Candidates Benefit from High Birth Rates? Putting the "Fertility Gap" to the Test

    Do Republican Presidential Candidates Benefit from High Birth Rates? Putting the "Fertility Gap" to the Test

    Do Republican Presidential Candidates Benefit from High Birth Rates? Putting the "Fertility Gap" to the Test The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Raley, Billy Gage. 2020. Do Republican Presidential Candidates Benefit from High Birth Rates? Putting the "Fertility Gap" to the Test. Master's thesis, Harvard University Division of Continuing Education. Citable link https://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37367668 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Do Republican Presidential Candidates Benefit from High Birth Rates? Putting the “Fertility Gap” to the Test Billy Gage Raley A Thesis in the Field of Government for the Degree of Master of Liberal Arts in Extension Studies Harvard University March 2021 Copyright © 2020 Billy Gage Raley Abstract During the 2004 election cycle, journalists discovered a correlation between state fertility rates and presidential election results. The media observed that states with high fertility rates tended to support Bush, and states with low fertility rates tended to support Gore and Kerry. This phenomenon came to be known as the “Fertility Gap.” After political pundits started discussing the Fertility Gap, a few scholars also picked up on the topic. To date, discussion of the Fertility Gap has been limited to elections between 2000 to 2012. A longitudinal study of the Fertility Gap has never been conducted.
  • The Undocumented Mark Steyn Free

    The Undocumented Mark Steyn Free

    FREE THE UNDOCUMENTED MARK STEYN PDF Mark Steyn | 448 pages | 30 Oct 2014 | Regnery Publishing Inc | 9781621573180 | English | Washington DC, United States The [Un]documented Mark Steyn - The Hugh Hewitt Show Or shared on social media. Alicia Colon : Jewish self-loathing. Dmitriy Shapiro : Rand repents? Eric The Undocumented Mark Steyn : Daydreaming may be the next childhood psychiatric target. Manuel Schiffres. Janet Bond Brill, Ph. Gabriel Schoenfeld : War Crimes in Gaza? Jonathan Tobin : Care about the Jewish state's future? Obama, in interview, reveals even more reasons to worry. Alan M. Rabbi Berel Wein : Mission men. Mark A. Kellner : OMG: Is profanity losing its punch? James K. These foods can help keep your skin smooth and supple. Marsha McCulloch, M. The Kosher Gourmet by Nick Malgieri : Chocolate molten delight with creme anglaise is a simple yet elegant make-ahead dessert. So America is now formally a one-party state, at least as far as fair access to media platforms is concerned. In old-school "people's republics", the dictator keeps the opposition party off the air. In the subtler version operated by social media, woke dictators of a nominally two-party state are now openly keeping one of those two parties off your telephones and tablets. Wanker conservatives of the lemming right wonder if this might be, ooh, a "campaign-finance violation". Hey, yeah, maybe John Durham can do that for his next any-day-now investigation-without-end. Meanwhile, tonight was The Undocumented Mark Steyn to be the second presidential debate, subsequently canceled when Trump balked at The Undocumented Mark Steyn official "debate commission"'s unilateral tearing up The Undocumented Mark Steyn the agreed format.
  • Congressional Record—House H5136

    Congressional Record—House H5136

    H5136 CONGRESSIONAL RECORD — HOUSE October 1, 2020 rights and advance the best interests of gress, and if someone were to ask me, national media assault on you, and the American people. well, what was your favorite session of they are going to attack you with ev- Madam Speaker, I urge all of my col- Congress, I don’t have to worry about erything. They will throw everything leagues to support the rule and under- the 116th being on that list. at you. He didn’t say but the kitchen lying legislation. b 1300 sink, but I got the message. The text of the material previously And when he first brought that up, referred to by Mrs. LESKO is as follows: But I rise to focus on a specific cir- Madam Speaker, I passed it off, be- cumstance here, and that is a misquote AMENDMENT TO HOUSE RESOLUTION 1164 cause I didn’t take it seriously. Noth- of me that was driven into just a na- At the end of the resolution, add the fol- ing like that had ever happened before lowing: tional feeding frenzy. It was validated in the history of this country that I SEC. 3. Immediately upon adoption of this by this Congress, this misquote. knew. resolution, the House shall proceed to the And when I stood on the floor of this And he brought it up a second time, consideration in the House of the bill (H.R. Congress and made a statement to de- and I passed it off again, because I 8265) to amend the Small Business Act and scribe what likely happened in an didn’t take it seriously.