DOCSLIB.ORG

Amnesties and International Humanitarian Law: Purpose and Scope

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Amnesties and International Humanitarian Law: Purpose and Scope ADVISORY SERVICE ON INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW ____________________________________ Amnesties and International Humanitarian Law: Purpose and Scope States party to the 1949 Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocol I of 1977 have an obligation to take measures necessary to suppress all acts contrary to their provisions. Moreover, States must investigate war crimes allegedly committed by their nationals or on their territory, and other war crimes over which they have jurisdiction, such as on the basis of universal jurisdiction, and, if appropriate, prosecute the suspects. In accordance with these obligations and the limits they impose, States may adopt certain measures during and in the aftermath of armed conflicts to promote reconciliation and peace, one of which is amnesties. International humanitarian law (IHL) contains rules pertaining to the granting and scope of amnesties. Specifically, Article 6(5) of Protocol II additional to the Geneva Conventions relating to non-international armed conflicts (NIACs) provides that, at the end of hostilities, the authorities in power shall endeavour to grant the broadest possible amnesty to persons who have participated in the armed conflict, or those deprived of their liberty for reasons related to the armed conflict. Importantly, under customary IHL (as identified in Rule 159 of the ICRC customary IHL study1), this excludes persons suspected of, accused of, or sentenced for war crimes in NIACs. Definition of amnesty convictions already handed an offence from serving all or down and/or lift sentences part of their sentence. There is no legal definition of already imposed. Amnesties amnesty in international law may also take the form of a but it can be understood as an treaty or political agreement.2 Purposes of amnesties official legislative or executive act whereby criminal An amnesty is generally In relation to a situation of investigation or prosecution of distinguished from a pardon. A armed conflict, the aim of an an individual, a group or class pardon occurs post- amnesty is to encourage of persons and/or certain prosecution and revokes the reconciliation and contribute to offences is prospectively or penalty without absolving the restoring normal relations in retroactively barred, and any individual(s) concerned of the life of a nation affected by penalties cancelled. In such responsibility for the crime.3 In such a situation.4 As a tool of cases, an amnesty can halt other words, a pardon does not transitional justice they serve imminent or ongoing extinguish penal responsibility many functions, including (but prosecutions, quash but exempts those convicted of not limited to) encouraging the 1 See ICRC customary IHL study Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 90, Cross, Vol. 86, No. 856, December available at: https://ihl- No. 870, June 2008, pp. 327–341; 2004, pp. 837–851; and Yasmin databases.icrc.org/customary- Laura M. Olson, “Provoking the Naqvi, “Amnesty for war crimes: ihl/eng/docs/home dragon on the patio – Matters of Defining the limits of international 2 See ICRC, Commentary on the transitional justice: penal repression recognition”, International Review of Additional Protocols, 1987, vs. amnesties”, International Review the Red Cross, Vol. 85, No. 851, para. 4617; OHCHR, Rule-of-Law of the Red Cross, Vol. 88, No. 862, September 2003, pp. 583–625. Tools for Post-Conflict States: June 2006, pp. 275–294; Simon M. 3 See ICRC, Commentary on the Amnesties, 2009; Anne-Marie Meisenberg, “Legality of amnesties Additional Protocols, 1987, La Rosa and Carolin Wuerzner, in international humanitarian law: paras 4617–4618. “Armed groups, sanctions and the The Lomé Amnesty Decision of the 4 Idem. implementation of international Special Court for Sierra Leone”, humanitarian law”, International International Review of the Red establishment of the truth persons alleged to have Importantly, the corresponding and/or preventing resurgence committed, or to have ordered customary IHL rule applicable or protraction of an armed to be committed, grave in NIAC clarifies that persons conflict. breaches and bring such suspected of, accused of, or persons, regardless of their sentenced for war crimes are Provided that they are not nationality, before their own excluded from such an extended to war crimes, courts, or extradite them. In amnesty.7 amnesties can be an important addition, States Parties must incentive to respect IHL ‒ in take measures necessary for IHL does not address particular for non-State armed the suppression of all acts amnesties in IACs. However, groups in the context of NIACs. contrary to the Conventions combatant immunity would other than the grave breaches. preclude the prosecution of The UN Security Council, UN persons who are entitled to General Assembly, UN Furthermore, in both IACs and prisoner-of-war status for Commission on Human Rights NIACs, it has been established merely participating in (Res. 1996/71 and Res. under customary IHL that hostilities. 1996/73), NATO and the States must investigate all war European Union have all crimes allegedly committed by Amnesties, or any other encouraged the granting of their nationals or armed forces, measures that would, in effect, amnesties to those who have or on their territory, and, if preclude any genuine merely participated in appropriate, prosecute the investigation and prosecution hostilities.5 suspects. They must also cannot be extended to those investigate other war crimes suspected of having committed over which they have war crimes or ordering them to Obligation of States to jurisdiction and, if appropriate, be committed. This would be investigate and prosecute prosecute the suspects.6 incompatible with States’ war crimes committed in obligation to investigate and, if international and non- appropriate, prosecute alleged international armed Granting of amnesties offenders.8 conflicts under IHL The issue of amnesties for war Under the system of grave In NIACs, Article 6(5) of crimes has been addressed by breaches set out in the four Additional Protocol II of 1977 various international courts, Geneva Conventions of 1949 provides that at “the end of which have generally (Arts. 49, 50, 129 and 146, hostilities, the authorities in supported the proposition that respectively) and Additional power shall endeavour to grant war crimes may not be the Protocol I of 1977 (Art. 85) the broadest possible amnesty object of an amnesty.9 States Parties are obliged to to persons who have impose effective penal participated in the armed sanctions for persons conflict, or those deprived of Relationship between peace committing, or ordering to be their liberty for reasons related processes, transitional committed, any of those grave to the armed conflict, whether justice and amnesties breaches during an they are interned or detained”. international armed conflict Transitional justice can be (IAC). They must search for defined as the range of 5 For more information, see ‘Related ocumentId=3ED0B7D33BF425F3C12 and other international crimes before Practice’ under Rule 159 of the ICRC 57F7D00589C84 an international tribunal; ii) the customary IHL study: https://ihl- Also, for example, the European Court Furundžija judgment (1998) of the databases.icrc.org/customary- of Human Rights (ECHR) held, via the International Criminal Tribunal for the ihl/eng/docs/v2_rul_rule159 Grand Chamber decision in Marguš v. former Yugoslavia, which dealt with the 6 See Rule 158 of the ICRC customary Croatia (27 May 2014), that criminal war crime of torture, outlined that an IHL study: https://ihl- proceedings for charges of torture and amnesty covering crimes whose databases.icrc.org/customary- ill-treatment should not be time-barred prohibition had attained the status of ihl/eng/docs/v1_rul_rule158 or subject to an amnesty and that an jus cogens was invalid; and iii) the 7 See Rule 159 of the ICRC customary amnesty is generally incompatible with Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts IHL study: https://ihl- the duty to investigate and prosecute of Cambodia (in 2011) affirmed that an databases.icrc.org/customary- serious crimes, including war crimes. amnesty by royal decree could not ihl/eng/docs/v1_rul_rule159 9 For example: i) the Special Court for relieve Cambodia of its “absolute 8 See ICRC, Commentary on the First Sierra Leone, in the Decision on obligation to ensure the prosecution or Geneva Convention, 2nd edition, Challenge to jurisdiction: Lomé Accord punishment of perpetrators of grave 2016, para. 2845: https://ihl- Amnesty (2003), stated that the breaches of the 1949 Geneva databases.icrc.org/applic/ihl/ihl.nsf/Co granting of amnesties by a State did Conventions, genocide and torture”. mment.xsp?action=openDocument&d not rule out prosecution for war crimes processes and mechanisms NIAC. The Inter-American their orders, or owing to their that seek to address the legacy Court of Human Rights failure to prevent, repress or of a violent past linked to an (IACHR) held that “the report such acts.12 If they are armed conflict or other enactment of amnesty laws on suspected or found guilty of the situations of violence, and thus the conclusion of hostilities in commission of a war crime bring about major political non-international armed under one of these forms of changes in post-conflict conflicts are sometimes liability, then they may not societies. These processes justified to pave the way to a benefit from an amnesty. comprise both judicial and non- return to peace”.10 However, judicial mechanisms, the the IACHR interpreted particular aims of which are to: Article 6(5) of Additional Extension to crimes against (i) establish the truth about Protocol II to exclude humanity, genocide and gross violations of human amnesties that preclude the other international crimes rights and war crimes that investigation and prosecution occurred in the past; of war crimes. In addition to war crimes, (ii) strengthen the rule of law; amnesties cannot apply to (iii) ensure reparation for This case (as well as others genocide, crimes against victims; and (iv) impose mentioned above) illustrates humanity, torture and other sanctions on the perpetrators.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ANNEX III (Public)
    ICC-01/11-01/11-650-AnxIII-tENG 25-09-2018 1/5 EK PT ANNEX III (Public) 1 Official Court Translation ICC-01/11-01/11-650-AnxIII-tENG 25-09-2018 2/5 EK PT State of Libya Libyan House of Representatives Law 6/2015 on General Amnesty The House of Representatives NOTING: The interim Constitutional Declaration issued on 3 August 2011 and its amendments; Law 10/2014 on the Election of the House of Representatives during the Transitional Period and its amendment; Law 6/2006 on the Judicial System and its amendments; The Penal Code and the Code of Criminal Procedure, their amendments and supplementary legislations; The Military Penal Code and Code of Criminal Procedure and their amendments; Law 29/2013 on Transitional Justice; Law 17/2012 Laying the Foundations for National Reconciliation and Transitional Justice and its amendments; Law 3/2014 on Combating Terrorism; Law 35/2012 on Amnesty for Certain Crimes; Resolution 7/2014 of the House of Representatives on the Dissolution of all Irregular Military Formations; The submissions of the Justice and National Reconciliation Committee of the House of Representatives; The conclusions of the House of Representatives at its 34th Ordinary Meeting held on 28 July 2015. The following shall become law: Chapter One Article 1 With due regard to the provisions of Articles 2 and 3 of the present Law, all Libyans who committed crimes during the period from 15 February 2011 until the promulgation of the Present Law shall be covered by a general amnesty. Criminal proceedings related to such crimes shall be terminated, and sentences handed down shall be revoked.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Analysis of How Transitional Justice Methods Address Enforced Disappearances in Spain & Argentina
    The Forum April 2020 Without a Trace: A Comparative Analysis of How Transitional Justice Methods Address Enforced Disappearances in Spain & Argentina Paige Calabrese J.D. Candidate, SMU Dedman School of Law, 2021; Staff Editor for the International Law Review Association Find this and additional student articles at: https://smulawjournals.org/ilra/forum/ Recommended Citation Paige Calabrese, Without a Trace: A Comparative Analysis of How Transitional Justice Methods Address Enforced Disappearances in Spain & Argentina, ________________ (2020) https://smulawjournals.org/ilra/forum/. This article is brought to you for free and open access by The Forum which is published by student editors on The International Law Review Association in conjunction with the SMU Dedman School of Law. For more information, please visit: https://smulawjournals.org/ilra/. Without a Trace: A Comparative Analysis of How Transitional Justice Methods Address Enforced Disappearances in Spain & Argentina By: Paige Calabrese Fall 2019 When a country is plagued with civil war, dictatorship, or extreme internal unrest, governments can become pressured to take aggressive measures to maintain order and establish power, including abducting citizens believed to be threats to their power. This phenomenon of government-orchestrated civilian abductions is known as “enforced disappearance,” and it leaves damage that endures long after the conflict or dictatorship has come to an end. While many countries have histories checkered with this practice, two countries stand out because of the remedial provisions they have enacted in their transitions to democracy: Spain and Argentina. Spain is often criticized for not taking effective remedial action, but Argentina is frequently praised for its aggressive prosecution of former government officials involved in perpetrating civilian abductions.
    [Show full text]
  • Beirut's Sunset: Civil War, Right to the Truth and Public Remembrance 1
    Beirut's Sunset: Civil War, Right to the Truth and Public Remembrance Gianluca Siega Battel' 1. The Years of Darkness: An International-Regional Civil War Several factors contributed to the 1975-1990 Lebanese civil war and different weight has been given to them in the literature on the topic. Some have a distinct Lebanese origin; others pertain to the domain of Middle Eastern and inter­ national politics. Inter-communal (and no less ferocious intra­ " Human rights expert; areas of expertise include minority rights, communal <<wars within the wan>) battles intertwined with post-conflict situations, the Balkans wars by proxy and episodes of full-scale inter-state conflict and the Middle East. against a background of regional rivalries (many states of the 1 On Lebanon's recent history and region played a role, even if only financial or diplomatic), the the civil war, I have consulted, among others: P. Hitti, History of unsolved Palestinian issue and the influence of superpowers. the Arabs, London, Palgrave The Lebanese civil war is probably better described as «cycles MacMillan, 2002 (1st ed. 1937), pp. 728-736; P. Mansfield, A History of of wars» with internal, regional and international dimensions'. the Middle East, London, Penguin In its modern history Lebanon experienced two civil wars prior Books, 2003 (1st ed. 1991), pp. 280- 322; F. Massoulie, Les conflicts du to 1975: in 1858-1860, between the Maronite and Druze Proche Orient, Paris, Casterman, communities, which triggered French intervention in defense 1994 (revised ed.); R. Fisk, Pity the Nation: Lebanon at War, london, of the former, and in 1958, between pro-Western and Oxford University Press, 20013 (1st nationalist/leftist forces, which ended with US intervention at ed.
    [Show full text]
  • What You Need to Know About Medical Amnesty in Mip Cases
    WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW ABOUT MEDICAL AMNESTY IN MIP CASES Kelly Flint, Esq. Staff Attorney Student Legal Services 2013 MIP AMNESTY LAW PROVISIONS • MCL 436.1703(10)(a), (b)(i), (b)(ii), (c): • Individuals are not considered in violation of the MIP statute if: a)A minor who has consumed alcoholic liquor voluntarily presents himself or herself to a health facility or agency for treatment or observation including, but not limited to, medical examination and treatment for any condition arising from a violation of the statutory provisions of the penal code for offenses against a minor 750.520(b) to 750.520(g)(sexual assault offenses), MIP AMNESTY PROVISIONS CONTINUED • (b)(i) and (ii) • A minor who accompanies an individual who meets both of the following criteria: • i) Has consumed alcoholic liquor • ii) Voluntarily presents himself or herself to a health facility or agency for treatment or for observation including, but not limited to, medical examination and treatment for any condition arising from a violation of sections 520b to 520g of the Michigan penal code committed against a minor. MIP AMNESTY PROVISIONS CONTINUED • (c) • A minor who initiates contact with a peace officer or emergency medical services personnel for the purpose of obtaining medical assistance for a legitimate health care concern. WHAT THE STATUTE MEANS/ THINGS TO KEEP IN MIND • You must be the one to initiate the call to police or transport to the ER to meet the amnesty requirement. • If you or an “accompanying individual”are not the ones to initiate the call for help, amnesty may not be given by police or the court: • Police have discretion on amnesty when called by someone other than the intoxicated individual or someone accompanying that individual.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Commission on the Truth for El Salvador Issued Its Report Documenting the Human Rights Tragedy of the 1980-1991 Period
    August 10, 1993 Vol. V, Issue No. 7 EL SALVADOR ACCOUNTABILITY AND HUMAN RIGHTS: THE REPORT OF THE UNITED NATIONS COMMISSION ON THE TRUTH FOR EL SALVADOR INDEX Introduction ..............................................................................2 The Origins of the Truth Commission ............................... 4 Purging the Military: The Ad Hoc Commission .............. 7 The Truth Commission Begins Operations ..................... 10 Pressures on the Commission............................................ 11 The Content of the Report .................................................. 14 Cases Ascribed to Government Forces ....................... 15 Cases Ascribed to the FMLN ....................................... 17 Recommendations of the Commission ...................... 19 Reaction to the Report in El Salvador............................... 20 The Amnesty......................................................................... 23 An Evaluation of the Truth Commission Report ........... 24 FMLN Cases.................................................................... 25 News From Americas Watch - page 2 - Vol. V, Issue No. 7 Amnesty and Prosecutions........................................... 27 The US Role........................................................................... 29 "It would be good to keep in mind that, above all, what must be determined is the identity of those fundamentally responsible for these captures...those who gave the order, those who permitted them, even those who reveled C as in a Roman circus
    [Show full text]
  • ISIS in Iraq
    i n s t i t u t e f o r i n t e g r at e d t r a n s i t i o n s The Limits of Punishment Transitional Justice and Violent Extremism iraq case study Mara Redlich Revkin May, 2018 After the Islamic State: Balancing Accountability and Reconciliation in Iraq About the Author Mara Redlich Revkin is a Ph.D. Candidate in Acknowledgements Political Science at Yale University and an Islamic The author thanks Elisabeth Wood, Oona Law & Civilization Research Fellow at Yale Law Hathaway, Ellen Lust, Jason Lyall, and Kristen School, from which she received her J.D. Her Kao for guidance on field research and survey research examines state-building, lawmaking, implementation; Mark Freeman, Siobhan O’Neil, and governance by armed groups with a current and Cale Salih for comments on an earlier focus on the case of the Islamic State. During draft; and Halan Ibrahim for excellent research the 2017-2018 academic year, she will be col- assistance in Iraq. lecting data for her dissertation in Turkey and Iraq supported by the U.S. Institute for Peace as Cover image a Jennings Randolph Peace Scholar. Mara is a iraq. Baghdad. 2016. The aftermath of an ISIS member of the New York State Bar Association bombing in the predominantly Shia neighborhood and is also working on research projects concern- of Karada in central Baghdad. © Paolo Pellegrin/ ing the legal status of civilians who have lived in Magnum Photos with support from the Pulitzer areas controlled and governed by terrorist groups.
    [Show full text]
  • South Africa's Amnesty Process: a Viable Route Toward Truth and Reconciliation
    Michigan Journal of Race and Law Volume 3 1997 South Africa's Amnesty Process: A Viable Route Toward Truth and Reconciliation Emily H. McCarthy United States District Court for the District of Columbia Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjrl Part of the Comparative and Foreign Law Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, and the Rule of Law Commons Recommended Citation Emily H. McCarthy, South Africa's Amnesty Process: A Viable Route Toward Truth and Reconciliation, 3 MICH. J. RACE & L. 183 (1997). Available at: https://repository.law.umich.edu/mjrl/vol3/iss1/4 This Symposium Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Michigan Journal of Race and Law by an authorized editor of University of Michigan Law School Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SOUTH AFRICA'S AMNESTY PROCESS: A VIABLE ROUTE TOWARD TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION? Emily H. McCarthy* The road to democracyfor South Africa was based on compromise. One of the most significant compromises made by the negotiators was the acceptance of an amnesty process culminating in the passage of the Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act of 1995. The Act grants full indemnity from criminal and civil prosecution to anyone affiliated with a political organization who committed an "act associated with a political objective" and who fully discloses all relevant facts. The purpose of the Act is twofold: to establish the "truth" about the apartheid past and to promote "reconciliation" among South Africans.
    [Show full text]
  • Rule-Of-Law Tools for Post-Conflict States – Amnesties
    OFFICE OF THE UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS RULE-OF-LAW TOOLS FOR POST-CONFLICT STATES Amnesties UNITED NATIONS OFFICE OF THE UNITED NATIONS HIGH COMMISSIONER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS RULE-OF-LAW TOOLS FOR POST-CONFLICT STATES Amnesties New York and Geneva, 2009 NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Secretariat of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of its authorities, or concern- ing the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. HR/PUB/09/1 UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION Sales No. E.09.XIV.1 ISBN 978-92-1-154187-8 CONTENTS Page Foreword ....................................................................................................................... v Introduction ...................................................................................................................1 I. AMNESTIES DEFINED AND DESCRIBED ...................................................5 II. INTERNATIONAL LAW AND UNITED NATIONS POLICY ON AMNESTIES .......................................................................................11 A. Amnesties that are inconsistent with international law: overview ............................. 11 B. Further considerations in assessing amnesties ...........................................................24 C. United Nations principles and policies restricting amnesties ......................................27 D. Legal effect of amnesties
    [Show full text]
  • Failing to Deal with the Past : What Cost to Lebanon? for Transitional Justice
    Cover Image: On left: Ain El Remmaneh, Beirut, February 17, 1990. (Roger Moukarzel) On right: Special Tribunal for Lebanon. (STL) Top of map: Court room scene after four judges were assassinated in Saida, on June 8, 1999. (Annahar) Bottom of map: Chil- dren in Sin el Fil, 1989. (Roger Moukarzel) Design by Edward Beebe LEBANON Failing to Deal with the Past What Cost to Lebanon? January 2014 International Center Failing to Deal with the Past : What Cost to Lebanon? for Transitional Justice Acknowledgments The International Center for Transitional Justice (ICTJ) gratefully acknowledges the support of the European Union (EU), which made this project possible. Dima Smaira would like to thank Maya Mansour and Rami Smaira for their advice and support. ICTJ also thanks Nidal Jurdi for conducting a peer review. About the Authors and Contributors Dima Smaira is a researcher based in Lebanon specializing in Lebanese politics and the study of conflict and security. She is a PhD candidate in international relations at Durham University (UK). She holds an MA in International Affairs from the Lebanese American University. Her areas of specialization include issues relating to human security, stability, conflict, and the transformation of security in Lebanon. Roxane Cassehgari is a research assistant at ICTJ. She received her LL.M. from Columbia Law School, with a specialization in human rights, transitional justice, and international criminal law. She holds a dual law degree from Cambridge University (UK) and Panthéon- Assas (France). International Center for Transitional Justice ICTJ assists societies confronting massive human rights abuses to promote accountability, pursue truth, provide reparations, and build trustworthy institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • CASE GELMAN V. URUGUAY
    INTER-AMERICAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS CASE GELMAN v. URUGUAY JUDGMENT OF FEBRUARY 24, 2011 (Merits and Reparations) The Inter-American Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Inter-American Court,” “the Court,” or “the Tribunal”): Composed of the following judges: Diego García-Sayán, President; Leonardo A. Franco, Vice-President; Manuel E. Ventura Robles, Judge; Margarette May Macaulay, Judge; Rhadys Abreu Blondet, Judge; and Eduardo Vio Grossi, Judge also present: Pablo Saavedra Alessandri, Secretary, and Emilia Segares Rodríguez, Deputy Secretary, pursuant with Articles 62(3) and 63(1) of the American Convention of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” or “the American Convention”) and with Articles 31, 32, 34, 62, 64, 65 and 67 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court1 (hereinafter “the Rules of Procedure”), orders the present Judgment in the case of Juan Gelman, María Claudia García Iruretagoyena de Gelman and María Macarena Gelman García Iruretagoyena with the Eastern Republic of Uruguay (hereinafter "the State" or "Uruguay"), denominated “Gelman v. Uruguay.” Pursuant to Article 19(1) of the Inter-American Court Rules of Procedure in the present case (infra note 1), that establish that: “[i]n the cases referred to in Article 44 of the Convention, a Judge who is a national of the respondent State shall not be able to participate in the hearing and deliberation of the case.” Judge Alberto Pérez Pérez, of Uruguayan nationality, recused himself from participating in the processing and deliberation of this case and and signing of this Judgment. 1 The Court Rules of Procedure applied in the present case are those approved in the LXXXV Regular Period of Sessions held on November 16 and 18, 2009, and that came into force on January 1, 2010, pursuant to that approved in Article 78 therein.
    [Show full text]
  • No to Empty Promises: Chilean Law Guarantees Pinochet Total Impunity
    News Service: 235/98 AI INDEX: EUR 45/31/98 1 December 1998 No to empty promises: Chilean law guarantees Pinochet total impunity The 1978 Amnesty Law and parliamentary immunity that has afforded Augusto Pinochet total impunity from prosecution remains in full force today, and the UK should not allow anyone to disguise this major obstacle in bringing Augusto Pinochet to justice, Amnesty International said in a letter addressed to UK Home Secretary Jack Straw. In light of the recent statements by Chilean Foreign Minister José Miguel Insulza that Augusto Pinochet would be tried in Chile if allowed to return, Amnesty International has reminded the Home Secretary that most of the crimes subjected to judicial investigations in Europe in relation to the case took place under the period covered by Pinochet's self-amnesty law -- which has so far guaranteed total impunity to him and other alleged perpetrators. “When considering the former general’s case, Jack Straw must keep in mind that even two modest proposals introduced by the civilian government to reform the self-amnesty law -- to allow for the investigations into the fate of the "disappeared" without establishing responsibility -- were dismissed by Congress,” Amnesty International stressed. At present, Augusto Pinochet is also covered by parliamentary immunity in his capacity as a senator for life. Under this immunity, and according to the Chilean Constitution, he cannot be tried under any charges brought against him. Although the Chilean Constitution and the Penal Procedure Code establish the possibility of lifting parliamentary immunity for the purpose of judicial procedures, Amnesty International believes that this possibility is severely constrained in Chile under the current political circumstances.
    [Show full text]
  • How Reconciliation and Amnesty Legislation in Afghanistan Forgives War Criminals While Forgetting Their Victims
    Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs Volume 1 Issue 2 November 2012 To Forgive and Forget: How Reconciliation and Amnesty Legislation in Afghanistan Forgives War Criminals while Forgetting their Victims Sara L. Carlson Follow this and additional works at: https://elibrary.law.psu.edu/jlia Part of the Diplomatic History Commons, History of Science, Technology, and Medicine Commons, International and Area Studies Commons, International Law Commons, International Trade Law Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Political Science Commons, Public Affairs, Public Policy and Public Administration Commons, Rule of Law Commons, Social History Commons, and the Transnational Law Commons ISSN: 2168-7951 Recommended Citation Sara L. Carlson, To Forgive and Forget: How Reconciliation and Amnesty Legislation in Afghanistan Forgives War Criminals while Forgetting their Victims, 1 PENN. ST. J.L. & INT'L AFF. 390 (2012). Available at: https://elibrary.law.psu.edu/jlia/vol1/iss2/9 The Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs is a joint publication of Penn State’s School of Law and School of International Affairs. Penn State Journal of Law & International Affairs 2012 VOLUME 1 NO. 2 TO FORGIVE AND FORGET: HOW RECONCILIATION AND AMNESTY LEGISLATION IN AFGHANISTAN FORGIVES WAR CRIMINALS WHILE FORGETTING THEIR VICTIMS Sara L. Carlson* INTRODUCTION In 2009, after more than two generations of civil war and armed conflict, the controversial National Reconciliation, General Amnesty and National Stability Law (“Reconciliation and Amnesty Law”) became effective in the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan.1 This law aims to aid in the reconciliation process of former and current * J.D. candidate, 2012, Dickinson School of Law, Pennsylvania State University.
    [Show full text]