Last Stand Goshutes Battle to Save Their Sacred Water by Stephen Dark

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Last Stand Goshutes Battle to Save Their Sacred Water by Stephen Dark Cover Story Last Stand Goshutes battle to save their sacred water By Stephen Dark May 9, 2012 - In Spring Valley in eastern Nevada, the swamp cedar trees stand in somber silence. No more than a mile or so long, they are a narrow strip of sentries marking the place where, the Goshutes say, men, women and children belonging to the Goshute and Shoshone tribes were massacred in 1863 and again in 1897. In this hushed grove, the Goshute, along with the Duckwater and Ely Shoshone tribes, come to mourn and conduct spiritual ceremonies. Rupert Steele picks off a piece of cedar bark and rubs it up and down an eagle feather. The former chairman of the council of the Confederated Tribes of the Goshute Reservation then throws tobacco in different directions at the entrance to the swamp cedar grove and sings a sacred song in Goshute. He explains he’s acknowledging the spirits of those killed by the U.S. military and giving them thanks “for letting us come here and visit with you at your house.” Steele and the elders of his tiny tribe—out of 539 enrolled tribal members, approximately 200 live on the Goshute reservation in Deep Creek Valley, Utah—believe that where each murdered soul fell, the nutrients of their remains fed both physically and spiritually the swamp-cedar trees. “Otherwise you’d never see swamp cedar grow this tall and strong,” he says. As Steele sings, he “feathers up,” fluttering the eagle feather up and down his body so that the spirits he has brought with him stay outside the swamp cedar site. Then he blows through an eagle wing bone, summoning the spirits of his ancestors. “I want spiritual help, I want them to be with us.” That help is needed because the Southern Nevada Water Authority (SNWA) wants to run a multi- billion-dollar, 300-mile pipeline up to Spring Valley and four other valleys on the Nevada-Utah border—one of which, Snake Valley, is in Utah—to pump billions of gallons of groundwater to parched Las Vegas. SNWA’s spokesman, J.C. Davis, says the project is about finding an additional water supply for an area that is 90 percent dependent on the Colorado River, a rapidly diminishing source. The project includes not only the buried pipeline, but also overhead power lines, numerous electric substations, pumping stations and a storage reservoir. SNWA’s position is clear, Davis says: “All we can do, all we have done, is ask permission to use resources that the state dictated was available.” If the SNWA does eventually begin pumping, Steele and the tribe worry it will kill the swamp cedar and drain aquifers that extend into Utah and lie under their 113,000-acre reservation—a two-hour drive from the swamp cedar—turning their harshly beautiful land into a dust bowl. That’s a fear Davis calls “patently false,” arguing that the Nevada State Engineer, which oversees water rights, focuses on “making sure whatever pumping occurs is sustainable.” The homes and ranches in Ibapah rely solely on reservation springs and streams to survive. Much-needed income is also derived from hunters attracted to the reservation by prolific herds of elk. But beyond all that, the Goshute say their very religion and their right to pursue their beliefs and culture both on and off the reservation are at stake. “Every plant, trees, grasses, weeps with our blood which was spilled on this land,” Steele writes in an e-mail. The tribe’s “spiritual strivings, our mysticism, our relationship to nature, and our quickening desire for justice and peace” stem from a love of the soil of “our fathers and mothers, the metaphysical meeting of their personalities, temperaments, and bodies with this land.” Water is fundamental to the Goshutes’ beliefs, and they fear losing to Las Vegas’ thirst the sacred waters, around which their ceremonies revolve, that tumble down 11 streams from the Deep Creek mountain range. In the Goshute language, Steele says, water is referred to as a human being, a living entity. It is in the water that the spirits of their ancestors reside. If the water goes to Las Vegas’ fountains and man-made Venetian canals, the spirits will go there, too. SNWA’s Davis characterizes fears that his agency’s plans could wipe out the tribe as “hyperbole that doesn’t advance their cause.” Nevertheless, he acknowledges that the lack of pumping in rural Nevada means “we don’t have a lot of historical pumping to base projections on” as to how aquifers will respond. In 2011 hearings before the Nevada State Engineer, an SNWA attorney questioned whether the Goshute beliefs are akin to a child’s belief in the bogeyman. Goshute attorney Paul Echohawk found such comments “shocking and offensive” and one tribal member “left the room in tears.” The attorney later wrote a letter of apology to the tribe, but it did not placate Ed Naranjo, tribal council member and tribal administrator. “It’s like we believe in fairy tales,” he says. “That we’re nothing.” EVERYTHING’S CONNECTED Deep Creek is a land swept by winds from both the north and the south. “This is where they meet and fight,” Steele’s father would tell him. This community is so small that everyone knows everybody else’s business. While the council and tribal members have fallen prey in the past to personal agendas and factionalism, before Las Vegas’ threat they have found a new unity. In March 2012, the Nevada State Engineer ruled that despite the protests of the Goshute tribe— along with those of other tribes, ranchers, the LDS Church and other local landowners—Spring Valley could be pumped in monitored stages by the SNWA. Only litigation, including an April 2012 appeal of the engineer’s decision by the Goshute and two Nevada tribes, and a shortly expected environmental-impact report by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) stand in the way of a giant Las Vegas straw suctioning water from aquifers in rural Nevada near the Utah border. And no one knows for sure what the impact will be. According to hydrologist Tom Myers, who testified at the Nevada state engineer pipeline hearing in 2011, while pumping Spring Valley groundwater may not impact the reservation for 200 years, pumping Utah’s Snake Valley could have a much quicker impact, even if only a few feet. But in Ibapah, which has suffered increasing drought in the past decade, even a few feet could be devastating, say tribal members and nearby ranchers. The aquifers beneath Spring Valley, neighboring Tippett Valley and the reservation are all connected, Steele says, in the same way that his thumb is connected to his big toe. SNWA’s Davis rather compares the valleys’ aquifers to “a series of adjacent bathtubs, many of them sharing walls, some with cracks in them. Water does move from one basin to another, but it doesn’t move freely, by any stretch of the imagination.” While deputy Utah State Engineer Boyd Clayton says that all the scientific information his office has seen suggests that SNWA’s pumping will not affect Deep Creek, he says that “there’s never been pumping of this magnitude before. If you withdraw that much water, there will be change, there’s no avoiding that.” Dan McCool teaches political science at the University of Utah and is an expert on water resources as well as American Indian voting and water rights. He describes the pipeline as part of the “hell- with-you” water policy that has long defined the American West’s attitude to owning natural resources rather than sharing them. “There is absolutely no legal, ethical or moral cognition of what impact this has on other people,” he says. Though a passel of organizations and communities—including Salt Lake County—originally protested the plan, no one in government, it seems, is currently stepping up to protect the Goshutes. The Goshute are a sovereign nation, with their own tribal government, but Steele says when it comes to negotiations, whether with federal or local government, “they always put the Indians on the back burner.” Steele says part of the U.S. government’s treaty with the tribe involved the feds providing “welfare and safety for perpetuity.” Yet the federal entities charged with doing this, most notably the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) and the BLM signed a stipulated agreement in 2006 with SNWA withdrawing protests to the project, without consulting the tribe. According to the Las Vegas Sun, a BIA director said that the timing of negotiations between the federal agencies and the SNWA did not allow for consultation with the tribe, a claim tribal leaders dispute. The BIA did not respond to e-mailed questions for this story. “We relied too heavily on the BIA,” Naranjo says. “We have to do things for ourselves.” Utah Gov. Gary Herbert has yet to decide whether to sign an already-drafted 2009 agreement with Nevada over Snake Valley, or fight Utah’s neighbor in court. If Herbert signs the agreement, Steele says “it will be a big slap in the face.” Three times, he says, Herbert promised to help the tribe with water-related issues, and each time nothing materialized. “That’s a ‘no’ in my book.” Ally Isom, Herbert’s deputy chief of staff, says Herbert has made no decision regarding the agreement, but has been “consistently supportive of the Goshutes and hopes for their success as a people and as citizens of Utah.” Steele argues that having put their trust in government, now tribal members trust no one, including their own leaders.
Recommended publications
  • Hydrogeologic and Geochemical Characterization of Groundwater
    Prepared in cooperation with the Bureau of Indian Affairs Hydrogeologic and Geochemical Characterization of Groundwater Resources in Deep Creek Valley and Adjacent Areas, Juab and Tooele Counties, Utah, and Elko and White Pine Counties, Nevada Scientific Investigations Report 2015–5097 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Windmill over an abandoned stock well on the Goshute Indian Reservation looking east with the Deep Creek Range in the background. Hydrogeologic and Geochemical Characterization of Groundwater Resources in Deep Creek Valley and Adjacent Areas, Juab and Tooele Counties, Utah, and Elko and White Pine Counties, Nevada By Philip M. Gardner and Melissa D. Masbruch Prepared in cooperation with the Bureau of Indian Affairs Scientific Investigations Report 2015–5097 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior SALLY JEWELL, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Suzette M. Kimball, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2015 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod/. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • The Skull Valley Cultural Landscape," to Your Office
    72-22- Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Operated by Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy 5168 North Windriver Place Tucson, AZ 85750 April 12, 2001 Mr. Scott C. Flanders U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2 White Flint North 11545 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738 Dear Mr. Flanders: This letter transmits a copy of the report entitled, "The Skull Valley Cultural Landscape," to your office. This report has been prepared at the NRC's request and is provided to support the cultural resources evaluation of the environmental impact analyses effort for the Private Fuels Storage, L.L.C., Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation on the Reservation of the Skull Valley Band of Goshute Indians and related transportation facility in Tooele County, Utah. The report describes the ethnohistorical context for historic period occupation and use of Skull Valley by Native peoples over the past two centuries, and is based solely on a review of existing relevant literature. No fieldwork or direct contacts with tribal governments or Native American persons was completed during the course of this analysis. If you have any questions on the report's contents, please contact me at the above address or at (520) 577-6024. Sincerely, Paul R. Nickens, Ph.D. Senior Research Scientist Cc: w/encl Van Ramsdell - PNNL, Richland, WA 902 Battelle Boulevard - P.O. Box 999 RRiclan.d, \WAý 99352 The Skull Valley Goshute Cultural Landscape Prepared by Paul R. Nickens Battelle Pacific Northwest Laboratory For the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission December 2000 The Gosiute habitat is one of the leastfavorable in the entire Shoshoni area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birds of the Deep Creek Mountains of Central Western Utah
    UNIVERSITY OF UTAH BIOLOGICAL SERIES Vol. X I January 10, 1955 No. 4 The Birds of The Deep Creek Mountains of Central Western Utah BY WILLIAM H. BEHLE PUBLISHED BY UNIVERSITY OF UTAH SALT LAKE CITY t h e b i r d s o f t h e d e e p c r e e k m o u n t a in s OF CENTRAL WESTERN UTAH BY WILLIAM H. BEHLE In furtherance of a long-time survey of the avifauna of Utah the Deep Creek Mountain region of the central western part of the state was chosen as an area for intensive study. It was expected that gradients would occur in the characters of geographically variable birds between populations from the isolated ranges of the Great Basin and birds from the Wasatch Mountains to the northeast, those mountains that form the abrupt eastern margin of the Great Basin or the high plateaus of central and southern Utah. The Deep Creek region seemed most propitious for collecting a representation of the Great Basin races. While the analysis of the geographical variation was the main objective of the study and large series of the variable birds were desired, in accord with the general practice of making avifaunistic studies of particular regions, samples of other birds were taken when possible, and a study was made of the ecology of the birds of the region. Although the emphasis was on collecting, attention was paid to abundance, behavior, and life history features, as opportunity was afforded. Working out the details of the variation through­ out Utah must await the accumulation of additional material from many other locations, but in the meantime the results of the Deep Creek Mountain survey may well be placed on record to reveal the nature of the avifauna of this portion of Utah.
    [Show full text]
  • The Goshute Indians of Utah
    The Goshute Indians of Utah Dennis R. Defa The Goshute Indians live in a little known and sparsely populated portion of the state of Utah. There actually are two Goshute reserva­ tions, the largest of which is the Deep Creek Reservation located on the Utah-Nevada border about sixty miles south of Wendover, with a por­ tion of the reservation in each state. The second, and smaller, reservation is located in Skull Valley in Tooele County, about ninety miles west of Salt Lake City. Most people who visit this region of the state view it as a harsh, hard, and unforgiving place and wonder why anyone would choose to live there. However, for the Goshutes this desert region is home and they view it much differently than does the casual visitor. Before white Americans moved into the region, the Goshutes knew the land intimately and took from it all they needed to sustain life. As efficient and effective hunters and gatherers, they understood the fragile nature of the desert and maintained a balance that provided for their needs without destroy­ ing the limited resources of their arid homeland. At the time of their first contacts with whites, the Goshute people lived in the desert regions southwest of the Great Salt Lake. Exact bound­ aries are difficult to determine because of the nature of the land and the proximity of other peoples, but early chroniclers and surveyors provided some written descriptions of the general Goshute homelands. Captain James H. Simpson located the Goshute from the Great Salt Lake to the Un-go-we-ah Range, or Steptoe Mountains, in Nevada.
    [Show full text]
  • Tooele I°X2° Quadrangle, Northwest Utah a CUSMAP Preassessment Study by Holly J
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Tooele I°x2° Quadrangle, Northwest Utah A CUSMAP Preassessment Study by Holly J. Stein1, Viki Bankey1, Charles G. Cunningham2, David R. Zimbelman1, David W. Brickey2* Michael Shubat3, David L. Campbell1, and Mel H. Podwysocki2 Prepared in cooperation with Utah Geological and Mineral Survey Open-File Report 89-0467 1989 This report is preliminary and has not been reviewed for conformity with U.S. Geological Survey editorial standards and stratigraphic nomenclature. ^.S. Geological Survey ^Jtah Geological and Mineral Survey Denver, Colorado 606 Black Hawk Way Salt Lake City, UT 84108-1280 2U.S. Geological Survey Reston, Virginia *Now at: EG&G Energy Measurements, Inc. P.O. Box 1912 M.S. H-02 Las Vegas, NV 89125 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page PREFACE.......................................................... 7 SUMMARY.......................................................... 8 INTRODUCTION..................................................... 12 Scientific Gains............................................ 12 Industrial Profits.......................................... 13 Benefits to Other Agencies.................................. 13 GEOLOGY AND THE FORMATION OF MINERAL DEPOSITS.................... 15 The Oquirrh-Uinta Mineral Belt.............................. 15 Rock Types: Age, Structural History, and Relation to Ore Deposits.................................. 18 Precambrian Rocks...................................... 18 Mesozoic Plutons....................................... 22 Eocene and
    [Show full text]
  • STATE of UTAH DEPARTMENT of NATURAL RESOURCES Technical
    STATE OF UTAH DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Technical Publication No. 24 HYDROLOGIC RECONNAISSANCE OF DEEP CREEK VALLEY, TOOELE AND JUAB COUNTIES, UTAH, AND ELKO AND WHITE PINE COUNTIES, NEVADA by J. W. Hood and K. M. Waddell, Hydrologists U. S. Geological Survey Prepared by the U. S. Geological Survey in cooperation with the Utah Department of Natural Resources Division of Water Rights 1969 CONTENTS Page Abstract 1 Introduction 2 Physiography ...................................... .. 4 Climate 5 Geology 12 Water resources 12 Volume of precipitation 12 Surface water 14 General conditions 14 Available records of flow 16 Runoff 17 Outflow from the valley 18 Ground water 18 Source 18 Estimated average annual recharge 18 Occu rrence and movement 20 Storage 21 Discharge 21 Evapotranspiration 21 Potential evapotranspiration 23 Estimated evapotranspiration 23 Pumpage 24 Outflow of unconsumed spring discharge 25 Ground-water budget 25 Perennial yield 25 Chemical quality of water 26 Mountains 26 Valley 26 Chemical quality of ground water in relation to sources of recharge 26 Domestic supplies 27 Irrigation supplies 28 III CONTENTS--Continued Page Land use and development 28 Past and present development 28 Potential development 30 Proposals for additional studies 30 Selected references 31 Appendix 35 Well- and spring-numbering system 37 Use of metric units 37 Basic data 41 Publications of the Utah Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water Rights 50 ILLUSTRATIONS Page Plate 1. Hydrogeologic maps of the Deep Creek valley drainage basin, Tooele and Juab Counties, Utah, and Elko and White Pine Counties, Nevada In pocket Figure 1. Map showing location of report area in Utah and Nevada and other nearby areas previously studied 3 Figure 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of Groundwater Withdrawal at Least Chub Population Sites
    Summary of Groundwater Withdrawal at Least Chub Population Sites Draft Report April 2014 Report by: USFWS, Utah Field Office Last Updated: 6/12/14 Statewide Trends in Groundwater Development The Utah State Engineer (USE), through the Utah Division of Water Rights (UDWRi), is responsible for the administration of water rights, including the appropriation, distribution, and management of the State’s surface and groundwater. This office has broad discretionary powers to implement the duties required by the office. The USE’s Office was created in 1897, and the State Engineer is the chief water rights administrative officer. For groundwater management, Utah is divided into groundwater basins and policy is determined by basin (UDWRi, 2001). Based on the extent of groundwater development within each basin, they are either, open, closed or restricted to further appropriations. For basins that have significant overdraft, where discharge exceeds basin recharge, UDWRi has implemented groundwater management plans to return discharge to average recharge rates. Since 1963, U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) and several State of Utah agencies have annually authored joint reports providing a description of groundwater conditions in the State of Utah. The authors developed these reports to enable interested parties to maintain awareness of changing groundwater conditions (Burden 2013, p. 1). Small volumes of groundwater can be obtained from wells throughout most of Utah, but large volumes that are of suitable chemical quality for irrigation, public supply, or industrial use generally can be obtained only in specific areas (Burden 2013, p. 1). The USGS reports on groundwater development within the latter areas, and further defines each as significant or less significant development areas based on the volume of groundwater withdrawal.
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Tooele County, Utah Centennial County History Series
    A HISTORY OF Tooele County Compiled by Ouida Blanthorn UTAH CENTENNIAL COUNTY HISTORY SERIES A HISTORY OF Tooek County Compiled by Ouida Blanthorn Tooele County is the second-largest county in the state, extending from the ridge line of the Oquirrh Mountains to the state line in the west across a broad portion of northwestern Utah. Human habitation extends back thou­ sands of years to the period of ancient Lake Bonneville. Tooele was one of the first six counties created in Utah and began to be settled as early as 1850 by Mormon pioneers, who made extensive use of the county's rich grazing and timber resources. Tooele County has been known in recent decades for its vast desert expanses, including Bonneville Salt Flats, its mineral resources from both the Great Salt Lake and area moun­ tain ranges, and its uses by the U.S. military for test ranges and various other facilities, including the storage and disposal of chemi­ cal and other weapons. Growth of the county has been rapid in recent years, due in part to its proximity to Salt Lake City, many residents using Tooele County towns as bedroom communities for the Wasatch Front. Controversy currently exists between such residents and those who would expand use of the county for industrial growth and waste disposal, including nuclear- waste repositories. ISBN: 0-913738-44-1 A HISTORY OF Tooele County A HISTORY OF Tooele County Compiled by Ouida Blanthorn 1998 Utah State Historical Society Tooele County Commission Copyright © 1998 by Tooele County Commission All rights reserved ISBN 0-913738-44-1 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 98-61318 Map by Automated Geographic Reference Center—State of Utah Printed in the United States of America Utah State Historical Society 300 Rio Grande Salt Lake City, Utah 84101-1182 Contents GENERAL INTRODUCTION vii INTRODUCTION ix CHAPTER 1 The Geology and Geography of Tooele County 1 CHAPTER 2 Native Americans in Tooele County 33 CHAPTER 3 Trappers, Surveyors, and Wagon Trains: The Coming of Euro-Americans to Tooele County 45 CHAPTER 4 The Early Settlement of Tooele County ...
    [Show full text]
  • Tooele County General Plan
    TOOELE COUNTY GENERAL PLAN Gillies Stransky Brems Smith Architects Wikstrom Economic & Planning Consultants CH2M Hill Williams & Hunt John Becker Public Relations November 1995 9906150184 990218 PDR ADOCK 07200022 B PDR Tooele County General Plan UTAH The lyrics of a John Gorka song titled "Houses in the Fields" poignantly describe the loss of a rural lifestyle and open space: They're growing houses in the fields between the towns... And the spaces won't be spaces anymore... Developers paid better than the corn But this is not where they were born... There's houses in the fields And the last few farms are growing out of here. The common thread of public comment received during the development of this plan was directed towards maintaining the rural lifestyle and open spaces of Tooele County, while accommodating growth and change. The public policy recommendations in this plan are directed toward a future for Tooele County where the spaces will be spaces. Acknowledgments Steering Committee John Wright Earl Tate Bill Simonich Karen Perry Ann Allen Gilbert Davies Carol Johnson J. Raymond Johnson Leland Hogan Neal Cline Tooele County Staff J. Raymond Johnson, Director of Department of Engineering Neal Cline, Planning Director Planning Commission John Olson Shirley Worthington Gilbert Davies John Beagley Ann Allen Lois McArthur County Commission Teryl Hunsaker Gary Griffith Lois McArthur Consultants Gillies Stransky Brems Smith Architects Wikstrom Economic & Planning Consultants CH2M I-fl Williams & Hunt John Becker Public Relations TOOELE COUNTY GENERAL PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS Preface ................................................. CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY Backroundand Purpose Tooele's Place in the Region ..................... I CHA&rER TWO: PLAN PROCESS AND DATA ANALYSIS GeneralPlan Process: H-1 Plan Strategy ....................................
    [Show full text]