University Micrdfilms International 300 N

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

University Micrdfilms International 300 N INFORMATION TO USERS This was produced from a copy of a document sent to us for microfilming. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the material submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or notations which may appear on this reproduction. 1. The sign or “target” for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)”. If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting through an image and duplicating adjacent pages to assure you of complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a round black mark it is an indication that the film inspector noticed either blurred copy because of movement during exposure, or duplicate copy. Unless we meant to delete copyrighted materials that should not have been filmed, you will find a good image of the page in the adjacent frame. If copyrighted materials were deleted you will find a target note listing the pages in the adjacent frame. 3. When a map, drawing or chart, etc., is part of the material being photo­ graphed the photographer has followed a definite method in “sectioning” the material. It is customary to begin filming at the upper left hand corner of a large sheet and to continue from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. If necessary, sectioning is continued again—beginning below the first row and continuing on until complete. 4. For any illustrations that cannot be reproduced satisfactorily by xerography, photographic prints can be purchased at additional cost and tipped into your xerographic copy. Requests can be made to our Dissertations Customer Services Department. 5. Some pages in any document may have indistinct print. In all cases we have filmed the best available copy. University Micrdfilms International 300 N. /Ei L B HD., ANN ARBOR, Ml 4H106 8214098 Goodwin, Robert Glenn NEOGLACIAL LACUSTRINE SEDIMENTATION AND ICE ADVANCE, GLACIER BAY, ALASKA The Ohio State University PH.D. 1982 University Microfilms International 300 N. Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, M I 48106 Copyright 1982 by Goodwin, Robert Glenn All Rights Reserved PLEASE NOTE: In all cases this material has been filmed in the best possible way from the available copy. Problems encountered with this document have been identified here with a check mark •/ . 1. Glossy photographs or pages 2. Colored illustrations, paper or print ______ 3. Photographs with dark background 4. Illustrations are poor copy ______ 5. Pages with black marks, not original copy ___ 6. Print shows through as there is text on both sides of page ______ 7. Indistinct, broken or small print on several pages ^ 8. Print exceeds margin requirements______ 9. Tightly bound copy with print lost in spine _____ 10. Computer printout pages with indistinct print ______ 11. Page(s) ____________lacking when material received, and not available from school or author. 12. Page(s) ____________seem to be missing in numbering only as text follows. 13. Two pages numbered ____________. Text follows. 14. Curling and wrinkled pages ______ 15. Other _________________________________________________________________ University Microfilms International NEOGLACIAL LACUSTRINE SEDIMENTATION AND ICE ADVANCE, GLACIER BAY, ALASKA DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Robert Glenn Goodwin, B.S., M.A. ***** The Ohio State University 1982 Reading Committee: Approved By Professor Garry D. McKenzie Professor Richard P. Goldthwait Professor Hallan C. Noltimier Professor Kenneth 0. Stanley Professor Paul A. Colinvaux A* ^ Adviser V"' -- Department of Geology and Mineralogy Dedicated to future scientists who will study the wonders of Glacier Bay. ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project is part of the ongoing investigation of the glacial geology and glaciology of Glacier Bay National Monument by members of the Institute of Polar Studies, the Ohio State University. Fieldwork was supported largely through funds and equipment supplied by the Institute. Additional funds were made available through grants-in-aid from Sigma Xi Research Society; the Graduate Student Alum­ ni Research Award Program, the Ohio State University; and the Friends of Orton Hall Fund. Valuable logistical sup­ port was supplied by the National Park Service. Certain individuals require special thanks for the help that they generously supplied. Dr. R. P. Goldthwait suggested the study as a thesis problem, and he and Dr. G. D. McKenzie provided guidance in the field. Dr. D. M. Mickelson and Dr. Robert Sterret gave the author insight into ongoing glacial processes in Wachusett Inlet during the summer of 1978. Much assistance and a.iy hours of hard work were supplied by field assistants, Mr. Fred Barbis (1977) and Mr. Keith Knabe (1978). Dr. H. C. Noltimier made available laboratory equipment and supplies, and patiently provided a great deal of assistance during the paleomagnetic analyses. Dr. Paul Colinvaux graciously sup­ plied chemicals and equipment for pollen extraction and analyses. Apparatus for grain-size analyses was made iii available by Dr. K. 0. Stanley, and Dr. R. T. Tettenhorst provided equipment and assistance for mineral determina­ tions by x-ray diffraction techniques. Carbonate analyses were provided by the Soils Characterization Laboratory of the Department of Agronomy, the Ohio State University. Drs. R. D. Powell, W. N. Mode, and D. D. Kurtz provided the author with valuable suggestions. Manuscript prepara­ tion was done by Ms. Sallie Orr, Department of Geology and Mineralogy, the Ohio State University. The project could not have been completed without the support of the National Park Service. Dr. Greg Streveler and Mr. Bruce Paige made available unpublished field notes and provided much encouragement. Dr. Streveler and Mr. D. D. Chase rendered much aid in equipping field parties. The Captain and First Mate of the Park Service MV Nunatak and backcountry rangers provided transport for field per­ sonnel and equipment. The friendly hospitality of all the Park Service personnel is greatly appreciated and warmly acknowledged. This manuscript was reviewed by the following readers, whose thoughtful comments greatly improved the text: Dr. R. P. Goldthwait Dr. G. D. McKenzie Dr. H. C. Noltimier Dr. K. 0. Stanley Dr. P. A. Colinvaux Dr. K. Everett VITA December 25, 1951 ......... Born - Omaha, Nebraska 1974......................... B.S. with honors, Geology, University of Nebraska-Lincoln 1974-1976 .................. Teaching Assistant, Geology & Geophysics, University of Wisconsin-Madison 1976......................... M.A. , Geology, University of Wisconsin-Madison 1976-1977 .................. University Fellow, The Ohio State University 1977-1979 .................. Teaching Associate, Geology & Mineralogy, The Ohio State University 1979-1980 .................. Bownocker Fellow, The Ohio State University 1980-1981 .................. Research Associate, Institute of Polar Studies & Biological Sciences, The Ohio State Uni­ versity PUBLICATIONS Magnetic correlation of Holocene glaciolacustrine sediments, Glacier Bay, Alaska, 1980 (Abstract), EOS v. 61, p. 1194. Vegetation response to the Two Rivers ice advance, eastern Wisconsin, 1980 (Abstract), Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs v. 12, n. 7, p. 435. Gravity flow deposits in an ice-marginal lake, Glacier Bay, southeast Alaska, 1980, R.G. Goodwin and G.D. McKenzie (Ab­ stract) , Geological Society of America Abstracts with Pro­ grams v. 12, n. 5, p. 227. Delta growth in a marine inlet, Alaska, 1980, G.D. McKenzie and R.G. Goodwin (Abstract), Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs v. 12, n. 5, p. 250. Caves in Burroughs Glacier Remnant, Alaska, 1980, G.D. McKenzie and R.G. Goodwin (Abstract), Ohio Journal of Science Program with Abstracts v. 80, p. 30. v Development of collapsed glacial topography in Adams Inlet, Alaska, 1979, G.D. McKenzie and R.G. Goodwin, Second con­ ference on scientific research in the National Parks, San Francisco, CA, American Institute of Biological Sciences and National Park Service (in press). FIELDS OF STUDY Major Field: Quaternary Geology Studies in Glacial Geology Professor Richard P. Goldthwait Studies in Geomorphology Professor Sidney E. White Studies in Sedimentation Professor Kenneth 0. Stanley Studies in Geophysics Professor Hallan C. Noltimier Studies in Palynology Professor Paul A. Colinvaux TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ACKNOWLEDGMENTS.............................................iii VITA........................................................... v LIST OF TABLES ............................................. x LIST OF FIGURES .............................................xi Chapter I. INTRODUCTION...................................... 1 Location of the A r e a ........................ 1 Nature of Investigations.................... 1 Previous Investigations .................... 6 Retreat of Glacier I c e .................... 8 Post-Retreat Sedimentation in Marine I n l e t s ..........................................13 II. REGIONAL DESCRIPTION ........................... 19 G e n e r a l ..........................................19 Physiography and Vegetation..................... 19 Excursion Inlet ........................ 20 Glacier B a y ..............................
Recommended publications
  • Bartlett Cove Campground
    Glacier Bay National Park and Preserve Summer 2016 VISITOR GUIDE Trails.............................page 7 Boating & Camping.....page 22 Bears...........................page 31 Welcome to Glacier Bay National Park Table of Contents and Preserve. You have arrived both at a special place and at a momentous time. Numbers can have exceptional significance, General Information .....................3-14 especially years: 126 years of visitors coming to Glacier Bay, 91 Explore Glacier Bay years of protection as part of the NPS system, 10 years since the Supreme Court case confirming Park Science ...................................15-19 park marine jurisdiction. These Take a closer look years reveal a rising tide of under- standing of how unique and Guide to Park Waters Map .........20-21 deserving of protection Glacier Bay is. This year, though, con- Boating & Camping Guide ....... 22-29 tains two distinctive numbers: the Plan your adventure National Park Service is 100 years old and this is the birth year of the Protect Wildlife.............................30-35 Huna Tribal House, celebrating a Be aware and respectful new relationship with the Huna Tlingit (see page 4). For Teachers ...................................... 36 Share Glacier Bay with your class Please join us in celebrating 100 years of successes preserving America’s special places. Throughout the year there will be .............................................. 37 special events and activities culminating in the celebration of the For Kids Become a Junior Ranger Huna Tlingit Tribal House on NPS Founders Day, August 25. No matter which day you visit or how much time you have, there ............ 38 will be centennial activities in which to take part. Look on our The Fairweather Detective Search for clues to earn a prize information boards, the park’s website, or ask a park ranger to find out how you can participate.
    [Show full text]
  • The Diary, Photographs, and Letters of Samuel Baker Dunn, 1898-1899
    Old Dominion University ODU Digital Commons History Theses & Dissertations History Spring 2016 Achieving Sourdough Status: The Diary, Photographs, and Letters of Samuel Baker Dunn, 1898-1899 Robert Nicholas Melatti Old Dominion University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/history_etds Part of the Canadian History Commons, and the United States History Commons Recommended Citation Melatti, Robert N.. "Achieving Sourdough Status: The Diary, Photographs, and Letters of Samuel Baker Dunn, 1898-1899" (2016). Master of Arts (MA), Thesis, History, Old Dominion University, DOI: 10.25777/ mrs2-2135 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/history_etds/3 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the History at ODU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ODU Digital Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A ACHIEVING SOURDOUGH STATUS: THE DIARY, PHOTOGRAPHS, AND LETTERS OF SAMUEL BAKER DUNN, 1898-1899 by Robert Nicholas Melatti B.A. May 2011, Old Dominion University A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Old Dominion University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS HISTORY OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY May 2016 Approved by: Elizabeth Zanoni (Director) Maura Hametz (Member) Ingo Heidbrink (Member) B ABSTRACT ACHIEVING SOURDOUGH STATUS: THE DIARY, PHOTOGRAPHS, AND LETTERS OF SAMUEL BAKER DUNN, 1898-1899 Robert Nicholas Melatti Old Dominion University, 2016 Director: Dr. Elizabeth Zanoni This thesis examines Samuel Baker Dunn and other prospectors from Montgomery County in Southwestern Iowa who participated in the Yukon Gold Rush of 1896-1899.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Fact Sheet Bay Before Flying to Antarctica I11 Tile Longest N1igration of Any Bird Species ,, Superintendent Philip
    Arctic Terns raise their young at Glacier 2017 Fact Sheet Bay before flying to Antarctica i11 tile longest n1igration of any bird species ,, Superintendent Philip . ,Hooge Established Feb 26, 1925 Designated National Monument Dec 2, 1980 Designated National Park & Preserve 1986 Designated World Biosphere Reserve 1992 Designated World Heritage site Glacier Bay represents the most dramatic documented large-scale glacial retreat in the world and provides unparalleled opportunities for scientific study of tide~vater glaciers and ecosystem development. Size National Park 3,283,000 acres 5 130 square miles National Preserve: 57,000 acres 90 square miles 3,283,000 acres (roughly the size ofthe state ofConnecticut) Park Wilderness: 2,658,000 acres \Xlorld Heritage Site: 24,300,000 acres also includes Wrangell-St. Elias National Park, Kluane lvational Park (Canada) and Tatshe11sl1i11i-Alsek Park (Canada). One ofthe world's largest protected wilden1ess areas. Base Budget g 4,969,434 Staffing Permanent 55 Term/Seasonal 73 Volunteers 59 (contributed 2,202 hours ofwork in '16) Access Most visitors arrive on cruise ships and tour boats. The only road is 10 miles from the tiny town of Gustavus, Gustavus has an airport and is served by AK Airlines in summer and small planes all year round. The Alaska Marine Highway provides scheduled ferry service from Juneau to Gustavus. Visitation The number of vessels per day is limited in the summer months. 1\llaximum number of vessels allowed each day include 2 cruise ships, 3 tour boats, 6 charter vessels, and 25 private vessels. 2016: 485,415 Cruise ship passengers Hun1pback whales spend the sun11ner in Glacier Bay 16,230 Tour boat passengers and swiln to Hawaii/or the winter -30,000 Land Visitors 1002 Backcountry campers Trails 3 hil<ing trails: 10 miles over 700 miles of shoreline to kayak, camp, and explore.
    [Show full text]
  • Monarch Mountain/A Xéegi Deiyi Conservancy
    Monarch Mountain/A Xéegi Deiyi Conservancy Management Plan February 2016 Cover artwork: Wayne Carlick Foreword Tlingit Elders teach their people to work respectfully with all those who come to Taku River Tlingit traditional territory, to find ways to work together with respect and harmony. This conservancy management plan is part of the on-going collaboration between the Taku River Tlingit First Nation and the Province of British Columbia to sustainably manage the lands and resources of Tlingit territory through mutual respect and understanding. Wóoshtin wudidaa (the Atlin Taku Land Use Plan) set the stage for the Tlingit vision for a connected network of protected areas to be realized. These protected areas were identified to: protect important Tlingit cultural sites and landscapes; ensure continuation of Tlingit khustiyxh (way of life); sustain biological diversity and important wildlife habitats; and protect landscapes and places of importance for recreation and tourism. The Monarch Mountain/A Xéegi Deiyi Conservancy is an important part of Tlingit Tlatsini – the network of “places that make us strong.” We invite you to read and understand the importance of this place to the Tlingit people, and to others who make this region their home. We also invite you to explore and enjoy Monarch Mountain/A Xéegi Deiyi Conservancy, and take part in conserving and protecting its resources for future generations. Gunalcheesh / Thank you with respect i ii Monarch Mountain/A Xéegi Deiyi Conservancy Management Plan Approved by: February 1st, 2016 ______________________________
    [Show full text]
  • America's National Parks, Archaeology and Climate Change
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Undergraduate Theses and Professional Papers 2019 Looking Past, Looking Forward: America's National Parks, Archaeology and Climate Change Rachel Marie Blumhardt University of Montana, Missoula, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/utpp Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, and the Climate Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Blumhardt, Rachel Marie, "Looking Past, Looking Forward: America's National Parks, Archaeology and Climate Change" (2019). Undergraduate Theses and Professional Papers. 253. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/utpp/253 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Theses and Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Looking Past, Looking Forward: America’s National Parks, Archaeology and Climate Change Figure 1: Grand Prismatic Spring, Yellowstone National Park. Rachel Blumhardt 2018 Rachel Blumhardt 2019 Looking Past, Looking Forward: America’s National Parks, Archaeology and Climate Change There’s a certain elation associated with finding a piece of the past. Unearthing a projectile point or an atlatl foreshaft, or any of a number of other things can be the first step in trying to paint a picture of what life was like for people who lived in an area thousands of years ago. America’s national parks are set up to protect the natural and cultural attributes of certain areas of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Small Ship Cruises Alaska | Alaska's Inside
    SMALL SHIP CRUISES ALASKA | ALASKA’S INSIDE PASSAGE SOJOURN Small Ship Cruises Alaska | Alaska’s Inside Passage Sojourn Alaska Small Ship Cruise 9 Days / 8 Nights Sitka to Ketchikan Priced at USD $6,010 per person Prices are per person and include all taxes. INTRODUCTION Explore Southeast Alaska from its northern to southern ends on this Alaska Inside Passage Sojourn. Enjoy a collection of unique towns and Indigenous villages where you'll learn about the region's compelling history and three distinct Native cultures: Tlingit, Haida, and Tsimshian. Along the way, you'll journey through Southeast Alaska's most abundant wildlife areas and glacial fjords. Kayak, skiff, and hiking excursions allow for up-close and personal exploration. Don't forget to bring your camera and watch for wildlife like bears, eagles, falcons, caribou and foxes! Itinerary at a Glance DAY 1 Sitka | Embarkation DAY 2 True Alaska Wilderness Exploration DAY 3 Glacier Bay National Park DAY 4 Juneau/Orca Point Lodge DAY 5 Tracy Arm/Endicott Arm Fjord/Frederick Sound DAY 6 Wrangell DAY 7 Thorne Bay & Kasaan DAY 8 Metlakatla & Misty Fjords DAY 9 Ketichikan | Disembarkation Start planning your train vacation in Canada or Alaska by contacting our Rail specialists Call 1 855 465 1001 Monday - Friday 8am - 5pm Saturday 8.30am - 4pm Sunday 9am - 5:30pm (Pacific Standard Time) Email [email protected] Web alaskabydesign.com Suite 1200, 675 West Hastings Street, Vancouver, BC, V6B 1N2, Canada 2021/06/13 Page 1 of 5 SMALL SHIP CRUISES ALASKA | ALASKA’S INSIDE PASSAGE SOJOURN MAP DETAILED ITINERARY Day 1 Sitka | Embarkation Explore beautiful Sitka, the only community in Southeast Alaska that faces the open ocean waters of the Gulf of Alaska.
    [Show full text]
  • Glacial Geology of Adams Inlet, Southeastern Alaska
    Institute of Polar Studies Report No. 25 Glacial Geology of Adams Inlet, Southeastern Alaska l/h':'~~~~2l:gtf"'" SN" I" '" '" 7, r.• "'. ~ i~' _~~ ... 1!!JW'IIA8 ~ ' ... ':~ ~l·::,.:~·,~I"~,.!};·'o":?"~~"''''''''''''~ r .! np:~} 3TATE Uf-4lVERSnY by t) '{;fS~MACf< ROAD \:.~i~bYMaUi. OHlOGltltM Garry D. McKenzie " Institute of Polar Studies November 1970 GOLDTHWAIT POLAR LIBRARY The Ohio State University BYRD POLAR RESEARCH CENTER Research Foundation THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY Columbus, Ohio 43212 1090 CARMACK ROAD COLUMBUS, OHIO 43210 USA INSTITUTE OF POLAR STUDIES Report No. 25 GLACIAL GEOLOGY OF ADAMS INLET, SOUTHEASTERN ALASKA by Garry D. McKenzie Institute of Polar Studies November 1970 The Ohio State University Research Foundation Columbus, Ohio 43212 ABSTRACT Adams Inlet is in the rolling and rugged Chilkat-Baranof Mountains in the eastern part of Glacier Bay National Monument, Alaska. Rapid deglaciation of the area in the first half of the twentieth century has exposed thick sections of post-Hypsithermal deposits and some of the oldest unconsolidated deposits in Glacier Bay. About 30 percent of the area is underlain by uncon­ solidated material; 14 percent of the area is still covered with ice. The formations present in Adams Inlet are, from the oldest to the youngest: Granite Canyon till, Forest Creek glaciomarine sediments, Van Horn Formation (lower gravel member), Adams lacustrine-till complex, Berg gravel and sand, Glacier Bay drift, and Seal River gravel. No evidence of an early post-Wisconsin ice advance, indicated by the Muir Formation in nearby Muir Inlet, is present in Adams Inlet. Following deposition of the late Wisconsin Granite Canyon till, the Forest Creek glaciomarine sediments were laid down in water 2 to 20 m deep; they now occur as much as 30 m above present sea level.
    [Show full text]
  • Schaft Creek Project 2006 Meteorology Baseline Report
    CopperFox Metals Inc. Schaft Creek Project British Columbia, Canada Schaft Creek Project 2006 Meteorology Baseline Report Prepared by: March 2007 Rescan Tahltan Environmental Consultants Vancouver, British Columbia EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TM Executive Summary The Schaft Creek Project is located on the eastern edge of the Coastal Mountains in north central British Columbia. The climate of the project area is characterized by the transition between the coast and interior. The Coast Mountains, with peaks over 3,000 m in elevation lead to lifting of moist air masses moving inland from the Pacific Ocean. Annual precipitation in the Coast Mountains is often above 3,000 mm, while temperatures are mild due to the proximity of the Pacific. The climate of the interior sub-boreal plateau, on the other hand is continental with annual precipitations between 400 and 800 mm with very warm and short summers and cold winters. Automated weather stations equipped with sensors for temperature, precipitation, solar radiation, snow depth, and wind speed and direction were installed at four sites within the proposed project area. Snow-water-equivalent was also measured at two snow survey locations onsite. To characterize the climate conditions in the wider region, data from four government weather stations within a 100 km radius of the project area were used. Data is continuing to be collected at Schaft Creek Saddle and Mount LaCasse meteorological stations. Schaft Creek Saddle meteorological station was installed in October 2005 and continues to operate through 2007. Mount LaCasse meteorological station was installed in August 2006 and also continues to operate through 2007. The Schaft Creek and Mess Creek RainWise stations were installed in August 2006 and operated until early October 2006.
    [Show full text]
  • General Geology
    3 GENERAL GEOLOGY introduction: The Unuk River-Salmon River-Anyox map-area includes partof the con- tact of the eastern Coast Plutonic Complex with the west-central of margin the successor Bowser Basin. Geologically, geographically, and economically the country rocksof the area form a well-defined entity that the writer has called the Stewart Complex. Sedimen- tary, volcanic, and metamorphic rocks bordering the Coast Plutonic Complex range in age from Middle Triassic to Quaternary. The detailed stratigraphy of the entire area is not completely known, principally because of the extensive icefields, the poor accessibility, and the complex nature of the Mesozoic succession. North of Stewart, fossil evidence coupled with certain marker horizons has been to used outline and separate Triassic and Jurassic formations. Permian rocks were not specifically studied, although thick Permian carbonate units occur along the lskut River and immediatelyeast ofthe Bell-Irving Riverat Oweegee Peak (Fig. 1). In the map-area southof Stewart, fossils are rare; in the Kitsault River section, Hanson (1931) and Carter (personal communication) collected undiag- nostic Mesozoic fossils. Southof Stewart, identificationof Hazelton Group formations is still tentative becauseit is based on structural and lithological similarities and homotaxy. The natureof the Permian-Triassic boundarywas not determined in the map-area.To the north toward Telegraph Creek, where both Permian and Triassic rocks are well exposed, the nature of the Permian-Triassic boundaryis still uncertain, even though the Permian rocks which probably underlie part of the Bowser Basin have been studied by several petroleum exploration companies. Fusilinid studies on thick carbonate rocks exposed along the Scud River (Pitcher, 1960) indicate an Early and Middle Permian assemblage.
    [Show full text]
  • A, Index Map of the St. Elias Mountains of Alaska and Canada Showing the Glacierized Areas (Index Map Modi- Fied from Field, 1975A)
    Figure 100.—A, Index map of the St. Elias Mountains of Alaska and Canada showing the glacierized areas (index map modi- fied from Field, 1975a). B, Enlargement of NOAA Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) image mosaic of the St. Elias Mountains in summer 1995. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration image from Mike Fleming, USGS, EROS Data Center, Alaska Science Center, Anchorage, Alaska. K122 SATELLITE IMAGE ATLAS OF GLACIERS OF THE WORLD St. Elias Mountains Introduction Much of the St. Elias Mountains, a 750×180-km mountain system, strad- dles the Alaskan-Canadian border, paralleling the coastline of the northern Gulf of Alaska; about two-thirds of the mountain system is located within Alaska (figs. 1, 100). In both Alaska and Canada, this complex system of mountain ranges along their common border is sometimes referred to as the Icefield Ranges. In Canada, the Icefield Ranges extend from the Province of British Columbia into the Yukon Territory. The Alaskan St. Elias Mountains extend northwest from Lynn Canal, Chilkat Inlet, and Chilkat River on the east; to Cross Sound and Icy Strait on the southeast; to the divide between Waxell Ridge and Barkley Ridge and the western end of the Robinson Moun- tains on the southwest; to Juniper Island, the central Bagley Icefield, the eastern wall of the valley of Tana Glacier, and Tana River on the west; and to Chitistone River and White River on the north and northwest. The boundar- ies presented here are different from Orth’s (1967) description. Several of Orth’s descriptions of the limits of adjacent features and the descriptions of the St.
    [Show full text]
  • Rangifer Tarandus Caribou) in Canada
    PROPOSED Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series Recovery Strategy for the Woodland Caribou, Southern Mountain population (Rangifer tarandus caribou) in Canada Woodland Caribou, Southern Mountain population 2014 Recommended citation: Environment Canada. 2014. Recovery Strategy for the Woodland Caribou, Southern Mountain population (Rangifer tarandus caribou) in Canada [Proposed]. Species at Risk Act Recovery Strategy Series. Environment Canada, Ottawa. viii + 68 pp. For copies of the recovery strategy, or for additional information on species at risk, including COSEWIC Status Reports, residence descriptions, action plans, and other related recovery documents, please visit the Species at Risk Public Registry1. Cover photo: © Mark Bradley Également disponible en français sous le titre « Programme de rétablissement de la population des montagnes du Sud du caribou des bois (Rangifer tarandus caribou) au Canada [Proposed] » © Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, represented by the Minister of the Environment, 2014. All rights reserved. ISBN Catalogue no. Content (excluding the cover photo and illustrations) may be used without permission, with appropriate credit to the source. Note: The Woodland Caribou, Southern Mountain population is referred to as “southern mountain caribou” in this document. 1 www.registrelep.gc.ca/default_e.cfm Recovery Strategy for the Woodland Caribou, Southern Mountain population in Canada 2014 PREFACE The federal, provincial, and territorial government signatories under the Accord for the Protection of Species
    [Show full text]
  • A “Treasure Hunt” Handout Will Guide Children’S Time During Outdoor Glacier Viewing and Help Them to Learn About the Features of the Glaciers They Can See
    Topic: Dynamic Change, Research Method: A “treasure hunt” handout will guide children’s time during outdoor glacier viewing and help them to learn about the features of the glaciers they can see. Time Frame/Age: 20-40 minutes/6 – 12 years old Background: Glaciers have a unique vocabulary… Materials: Laminated “Glacier Treasure Hunt” handout for each child, post-it stickers (16 per card), Glacier Feature cards Procedure: 1. Give the group an introduction to glaciers. You can use the Glacial Feature cards to help. 2. Take group outside while in front of the Margerie and Grand Pacific glaciers. Break group into pairs of 2 to 4 (depending on the number of kids doing the activity). Give each group one “Glacier Treasure Hunt” card and 16 post it note stickers. 3. Explain that the goal is to find as many of the pictured items as possible. Once they’ve seen the real-life version of the item in the picture, then they cover it with a post it note sticker. If they need assistance or have questions, there are definitions of each item on the back of the card. 4. While the kids are searching, mingle with them and help them if they get stuck. Ask them to point out the features to you. You can also give them the definition for what is being pictured and ask them if they see anything like that around them. The goal is to get them to observe and study the glacial features, not just to click off all the pictures on the card.
    [Show full text]