Supreme Court of India [ It Will Be Appreciated If

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

1 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 11-01-2019 CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL (TIME : 10:30 AM) 9 Diary No. 31111-2018 XVII KRISHI UPAJ MANDI SAMITI MANDI YARD KHERTAL TARUN GUPTA Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX JAIPUR FOR ADMISSION and I.R. and IA No.182890/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.182895/2018-EXEMPTION FROM FILING C/C OF THE IMPUGNED JUDGMENT and IA No.182894/2018-EX-PARTE STAY and IA No.182892/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING 41 C.A. No. 3702-3705/2018 XVII M/S SALORA INTERNATIONAL LTD. THR. GENERAL MANAGER HINGORANI & ASSOCIATES Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE DELHI II B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1] COURT NO. : 2 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER (TIME : 10:30 AM) 2 36 Diary No. 45950-2018 XVII COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE ALWAR B. KRISHNA PRASAD Versus MUNNAWAR ALI AND ANR. IA No.111/2019-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.112/2019-STAY APPLICATION COURT NO. : 6 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINEET SARAN (TIME : 10:30 AM) MISCELLANEOUS HEARING 39 SLP(C) No. 7408/2018 XV M/S AIR INDIA LIMITED ANIL SHRIVASTAV Versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTIVE) JODHPUR HQRS AT JAIPUR B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1] COURT NO. : 7 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY (TIME : 10:30 AM) MISCELLANEOUS HEARING 19 Diary No. 45349-2018 XVII COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX II B. KRISHNA PRASAD Versus M/S MERINO INDUSTRIES LTD. FOR ADMISSION and IA No.184811/2018-EXPARTE STAY and IA No.184810/2018- CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING APPEAL 3 COURT NO. : 11 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.M. KHANWILKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY RASTOGI (TIME : 10:30 AM) MISCELLANEOUS HEARING 20 Diary No. 44586-2018 XVII COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS B. KRISHNA PRASAD Versus M/S VJ TRADERS IA No.184970/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.184971/2018-STAY APPLICATION .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Civil) No 494 of 2012 Justice Ks Puttaswamy (Retd
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) NO 494 OF 2012 JUSTICE K S PUTTASWAMY (RETD) & ANR ...PETITIONERS Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ...RESPONDENTS WITH T C (C) NO 151 OF 2013 T C (C) NO 152 OF 2013 W P (C) NO 833 OF 2013 W P (C) NO 829 OF 2013 T P (C) NO 1797 OF 2013 W P (C) NO 932 OF 2013 1 T P (C) NO 1796 OF 2013 CONMT. PET. (C) NO 144 OF 2014 T P (C) NO 313 OF 2014 T P (C) NO 312 OF 2014 SLP (CRL) NO 2524 OF 2014 W P (C) NO 37 OF 2015 W P (C) NO 220 OF 2015 CONMT. PET. (C) NO 674 OF 2015 in W P (C) NO 829 OF 2013 T P (C) NO 921 OF 2015 CONMT. PET. (C) NO 470 OF 2015 W P (C) NO 231 OF 2016 CONMT. PET. (C) NO 444 OF 2016 CONMT. PET. (C) NO 608 OF 2016 W P (C) NO 797 OF 2016 CONMT. PET. (C) NO 844 OF 2017 2 W P (C) NO 342 OF 2017 W P (C) NO 372 OF 2017 W P (C) NO 841 OF 2017 W P (C) NO 1058 OF 2017 W P (C) NO 966 OF 2017 W P (C) NO 1014 OF 2017 W P (C) NO 1002 OF 2017 W P (C) NO 1056 OF 2017 AND WITH CONMT. PET. (C) NO 34 OF 2018 in W P (C) NO 1014 OF 2017 3 J U D G M E N T INDEX A Introduction: technology, governance and freedom B The Puttaswamy1 principles B.I Origins: privacy as a natural right B.2 Privacy as a constitutionally protected right : liberty and dignity B.3 Contours of privacy B.4 Informational privacy B.5 Restricting the right to privacy B.6 Legitimate state interests C Submissions C.I Petitioners’ submissions C.2 Respondents’ submissions D Architecture of Aadhaar: analysis of the legal framework E Passage of Aadhaar Act as a Money Bill E.I Judicial Review of the Speaker’s Decision E.2 Aadhaar Act as a Money Bill F Biometrics, Privacy and Aadhaar F.I Increased use of biometric technology F.2 Consent in the collection of biometric data F.3 Position before the Aadhaar legislation 1 (2017) 10 SCC 1 4 F.4 Privacy Concerns in the Aadhaar Act 1.
[Show full text]
Judges of the Supreme Court of India and the High Courts
AS ON 01/06/2013 JUDGES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA AND THE HIGH COURTS AS ON ST 01 JUNE, 2013 AS ON 01/06/2013 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA Sanctioned Judge Strength: 31 (List of Judges arranged according to date of appointment) Sl. Name of the Judge Date of Date of REMARKS No. S/Shri Justice appointment Retirement [Parent High Court] 1 ALTAMAS KABIR 09/09/2005 19/07/2013 CJI W.E.F. 29.09.2012 CALCUTTA 2 P.SATHASIVAM 21/08/2007 27/04/2014 MADRAS 3 GANPAT SINGH SINGHVI 12/11/2007 12/12/2013 RAJASTHAN 4 R.M. LODHA 17/12/2008 28/09/2014 RAJASTHAN 5 H.L. DATTU 17/12/2008 03/12/2015 KARNATAKA 6 DR. BALBIR SINGH CHAUHAN 11/05/2009 02/07/2014 ALLAHABAD 7 ANANGA KUMAR PATNAIK 17/11/2009 03/06/2014 ORISSA 8 TIRATH SINGH THAKUR 17/11/2009 04/01/2017 JAMMU & KASHMIR 9 K.S.P. RADHAKRISHNAN 17/11/2009 15/05/2014 KERALA 10 SURINDER SINGH NIJJAR 17/11/2009 07/06/2014 PUNJAB & HARYANA 11 CHANDRAMAULI KUMAR PRASAD 08/02/2010 15/07/2014 PATNA 12 HEMANT LAXMAN GOKHALE 30/04/2010 10/03/2014 BOMBAY 13 SMT. GYAN SUDHA MISRA 30/04/2010 28/04/2014 PATNA 14 ANIL RAMESH DAVE 30/04/2010 19/11/2016 GUJARAT 15 S. J. MUKHOPADHAYA 13/09/2011 15/03/2015 JHARKHAND 16 SMT. R.P. DESAI 13/09/2011 30/10/2014 BOMBAY 17 JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR 13/09/2011 28/08/2017 PUNJAB & HARYANA 18 DIPAK MISRA 10/10/2011 03/10/2018 ORISSA 19 JASTI CHELAMESWAR 10/10/2011 23/06/2018 ANDHRA PRADESH 20 F.M.I.
[Show full text]
Supreme Court of India [ It Will Be Appreciated If
1 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 16-11-2018 CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE K.M. JOSEPH (TIME : 10:30 AM) 43 SLP(Crl) No. 7188/2018 II-C R. SIVARAJ JOGY SCARIA Versus THE STATE REP BY ITS THE SUPERINTENDENT OF CUSTOMS B. KRISHNA PRASAD[R-1] {Mention Memo} FOR ADMISSION and I.R. COURT NO. : 3 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER (TIME : 10:30 AM) 1. C.A. No. 4708-4711/2008 XII COMMR.OF SERVICE TAX,CHENNAI B. KRISHNA PRASAD Versus M/S DIEBOLD SYSTEMS(P) LTD. M. P. DEVANATH 1.2 Connected C.A. No. 5979/2009 XII COMMR.OF SERVICE TAX,CHENNAI B. KRISHNA PRASAD Versus M/S KONE ELEVATORS INDIA PVT. LTD PAREKH & CO. 2 6 Diary No. 35943-2018 XVII TEJAS NETWORKS INDIA LTD. GAUTAM NARAYAN Versus THE COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE IA No.157401/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING and IA No.157404/2018-EX-PARTE STAY and IA No.157403/2018-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN REFILING and IA No.159489/2018-PERMISSION TO FILE ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTS/FACTS COURT NO. : 4 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.A. BOBDE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE L. NAGESWARA RAO (TIME : 10:30 AM) 12 Diary No. 36950-2018 XVII COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE DELHI I B.
[Show full text]
Supreme Court of India [ It Will Be Appreciated If
1 SUPREME COURT OF INDIA [ IT WILL BE APPRECIATED IF THE LEARNED ADVOCATES ON RECORD DO NOT SEEK ADJOURNMENT IN THE MATTERS LISTED BEFORE ALL THE COURTS IN THE CAUSE LIST ] DAILY CAUSE LIST FOR DATED : 14-01-2019 CHIEF JUSTICE'S COURT HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK BHUSHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KISHAN KAUL (TIME : 10:30 AM) MISCELLANEOUS HEARING 28 SLP(C) No. 33666/2018 XIV THE COMMISSIONER OF SERVICE TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD Versus VANNI KAPOOR AND ORS. FOR ADMISSION and I. COURT NO. : 2 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.K. SIKRI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. ABDUL NAZEER (TIME : 10:30 AM) 7 C.A. No. 1638/2006 XVII M/S. LAFARGE INDIA LTD. THRUOGH ITS DY. MANAGER EXCISE RADHA SHYAM JENA Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE B. KRISHNA PRASAD ONLY I.A. NO. 149147/2018 APPLICATION FOR STAY IN C.A. Nos. 10943-44/2016 IS TO BE LISTED 7.1 Connected C.A. No. 10943-10944/2016 III-A M/S RATHI STEEL AND POWER LTD. DHANANJAY GARG Versus COMMISSIONER, CUSTOMS, CENTRAL EXCISE AND SERVICE TAX B. KRISHNA PRASAD FOR STAY APPLICATION ON IA 149147/2018 IA No. 149147/2018 - STAY APPLICATION 2 52 C.A. No. 2912/2018 XVII SERCON INDIA PVT LTD AMBHOJ KUMAR SINHA Versus COMMISSIONER (ADJUDICATION) SERVICE TAX IA No. 29815/2018 - STAY APPLICATION COURT NO. : 7 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABHAY MANOHAR SAPRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UDAY UMESH LALIT (TIME : 10:30 AM) 42 SLP(Crl) No. 169/2019 II-A UNION OF INDIA AND ORS.
[Show full text]
COURT NEWS Vol
COURT NEWS Vol. XIV Issue No.1 January - March, 2019 EDITORIAL BOARD Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan, Judge, Supreme Court of India Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul, Judge, Supreme Court of India Hon'ble Mr. Justice K.M. Joseph, Judge, Supreme Court of India COMPILED BY Sanjeev Sudhakar Kalgaonkar, Secretary General, Supreme Court of India Bibhuti Bhushan Bose, Editor, Supreme Court of India A quarterly newsletter published by Supreme Court of India, New Delhi Also available on website : www.sci.gov.in LIST OF SUPREME COURT JUDGES (As on 31-03-2019) Date of Date of S.No. Name of the Hon’ble Judge Appointment Retirement 23-04-2012 Hon’ble Shri Ranjan Gogoi, 01 As CJI: 18-11-2019 Chief Justice of India 03-10-2018 02 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sharad Arvind Bobde 12-04-2013 24-04-2021 03 Hon’ble Mr. Justice N.V. Ramana 17-02-2014 27-08-2022 04 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Arun Misra 07-07-2014 03-09-2020 05 Hon’ble Mr. Justice R.F. Nariman 07-07-2014 13-08-2021 06 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Abhay Manohar Sapre 13-08-2014 28-08-2019 07 Hon’ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi 13-08-2014 20-07-2020 08 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit 13-08-2014 09-11-2022 09 Hon’ble Mr. Justice A.M. Khanwilkar 13-05-2016 30-07-2022 10 Hon’ble Dr. Justice D.Y. Chandrachud 13-05-2016 11-11-2024 11 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ashok Bhushan 13-05-2016 05-07-2021 12 Hon’ble Mr.
[Show full text]
Simran Ablaze IAS ACADEMY SCO 226 Sector 36-D Chandigarh, Tel 9779190222 ,9988210461
Simran Ablaze IAS ACADEMY SCO 226 Sector 36-D Chandigarh, Tel 9779190222 ,9988210461 www.simranias.com Judiciary July Month Currents The Court should not only consider the accused but also the society at large: SC In Suryakant Baburao vs. State of Maharashtra, the High Court reduced the sentence of imprisonment from seven years to five years to an 'attempt to murder' accused. Disagreeing to which, the Supreme Court of bench comprising Justice R. Banumathi and Justice AS Bopanna observed that "The courts must not only keep in view the right of the accused, but must also keep in view the interest of the victim and society at large. The courts have been consistent in the approach that a reasonable proportion has to be maintained between the gravity of the offense and the punishment. While it is true that the sentence imposed upon the accused should not be harsh, the inadequacy of sentence may lead to the sufferance of the victim and the community at large." Tiple Talaq Bill passed in Rajya Sabha After intense discussion and debate of nearly five hours, the Rajya Sabha passed the "Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Marriage) Bill 2019", generally known as Triple Talaq Bill. The Lok Sabha had passed the Bill on July 25 with 303 'yes' votes against 82 'no' votes. The Rajya Sabha Chairman Venkaiah Naidu declared the Bill passed with 99 'yes' votes and 84 'no' votes. BSP, TRS, TDP, JD(U) and AIADMK abstained from voting. The Triple Talaq Bill passed in last year's winter session during December 2018 had got lapsed as the Rajya Sabha did not clear it before the dissolution of 16th Lok Sabha.
[Show full text]
Judges of the Supreme Court of India and the High Courts
JUDGES OF THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA AND THE HIGH COURTS As on 01st November, 2014 GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE 1 PREFACE This Handbook on Judges of the Supreme Court and the High Courts provides details of the composition of the Supreme Court and the twenty-one High Courts in the country as on 1st November, 2014. The names of the Chief Justices of the High Courts and Permanent Judges have been arranged as per seniority on all-India basis as well as with reference to their dates of retirement. to the dates of expiry of their tenure. For facility of reference, Additional Judges’ names have been arranged according A statement showing the names of Chief Justices appointed/ transferred to outside High Courts, has also been incorporated in the Hand book. As in the previous editions, this Handbook contains names of Judges of Supreme Court and High Courts who retired on or after January 1, 2009. Any error or omission in this compilation may be brought to the notice of the Department of Justice. In case of any doubt or discrepancy, needless to say, the original records have to be relied upon. The publication has been prepared in the Department of Justice under the overall supervision and guidance of SHRI PRAVEEN GARG, JOINT SECRETARY, SHRI H.C. BHATIA, DEPUTY SECRETARY, SHRI K.C. THANG, UNDER SECRETARY AND SHRI S. VIJAY GOPAL, UNDER SECRETARY. They were extensively assisted in compilation of the data and conceptualization, presentation and overall preparation of the final manuscript by SHRI RAMARAJHU, SECTION OFFICER.
[Show full text]
CONFIDENTIAL to Hon'ble Mr. Justice Dipak Misra Chief Justice of India Lord Bingham in His Book
C O N F I D E N T I A L March 21, 2018 To Hon’ble Mr. Justice Dipak Misra Chief Justice of India Lord Bingham in his book ‘The Rule of Law’ said that “there are countries in the world where all judicial decisions find favour with the powers that be, but they are probably not places where any of us would wish to live”. Let us also not live where Bingham loathed to live. We, the judges of the Supreme Court of India, are being accused of ceding our independence and our institutional integrity to the Executive’s incremental encroachment. The Executive is always impatient, and brooks no disobedience even of the judiciary if it can. Attempts were always made to treat the Chief Justices as the Departmental Heads in the Secretariat. So much for our “independence and preeminence” as a distinct State organ. Someone from Bangalore has already beaten us in the race to the bottom. The Chief Justice of the Karnataka High Court has been more than willing to do the Executive bidding, behind our back. I read with dismay and disbelief the “confidential report” sent to the Hon’ble Chief Justice by Shri Dinesh Maheswari, the Chief Justice of Karnataka High Court. To begin with, it was unasked for. Second, it is uncalled for. The confidential report blatantly records the impropriety of the executive directly contacting the High Court to reassess a collegium recommendation of the Supreme Court. It is a moot proposition that any Principal & Sessions Judge is the administrative head of the district he works in.
[Show full text]
SC Judge Appt Age 2000-2020
Name DoB DoA DoR Age (Days) DoA Age (Yrs) at DoA Age (Yrs, Mths) at DoA CJI? Doraiswamy Raju 1939-07-02 2000-01-28 2004-07-01 22125.00 60.61643836 60yrs 6mths Ruma Pal 1941-06-03 2000-01-28 2006-06-02 21423.00 58.69315068 58yrs 7mths YK Sabharwal 1942-01-14 2000-01-28 2007-01-13 21198.00 58.07671233 58yrs 0mths SN Variava 1940-11-08 2000-03-15 2005-11-07 21677.00 59.3890411 59yrs 4mths Shivaraj V Patil 1940-01-12 2000-03-15 2005-01-11 21978.00 60.21369863 60yrs 2mths yes KG Balakrishnan 1945-05-12 2000-08-06 2010-05-12 20175.00 55.2739726 55yrs 2mths BrijEsh Kumar 1939-06-10 2000-10-19 2004-06-09 22412.00 61.40273973 61yrs 4mths BN Agrwal 1944-10-15 2000-10-19 2009-10-15 20458.00 56.04931507 56yrs 0mths P VEnkataramma REddi 1940-08-10 2001-08-17 2005-08-09 22287.00 61.06027397 61yrs 0mths Ashok Bhan 1943-10-02 2001-08-17 2008-10-02 21139.00 57.91506849 57yrs 10mths Arijit Pasayat 1944-05-10 2001-10-19 2009-05-10 20981.00 57.48219178 57yrs 5mths BP Singh 1942-07-09 2001-12-14 2007-07-08 21708.00 59.4739726 59yrs 5mths DM Dharmadhikari 1940-08-14 2002-03-05 2005-08-13 22483.00 61.59726027 61yrs 6mths HK SEma 1943-06-01 2002-04-09 2008-06-01 21497.00 58.89589041 58yrs 10mths SB Sinha 1944-08-08 2002-10-03 2009-08-08 21240.00 58.19178082 58yrs 1mths Arun Kumar 1941-04-12 2002-10-03 2006-04-11 22454.00 61.51780822 61yrs 5mths BN Srikrishna 1941-05-21 2002-10-03 2006-05-20 22415.00 61.4109589 61yrs 4mths AR Lakshmanan 1942-03-22 2002-12-20 2007-03-21 22188.00 60.7890411 60yrs 8mths GP Mathur 1943-01-19 2002-12-20 2008-01-19 21885.00 59.95890411
[Show full text]
Court News Vol. XIII, Issue No.4
CONTENTS Appointments and Retirements in the Supreme Court of India…………… 2 Appointments in the High Courts ………………………............................. 3 - 4 Transfers between the High Courts.......................................................... 5 Vacancies in the Courts……………………………………………………… 6 - 7 Institution, Disposal and Pendency of Cases in the Supreme Court……. 8 Institution, Disposal and Pendency of Cases in the High Courts ……….. 9 Institution, Disposal and Pendency of Cases in the District and Subordinate Courts ………………………………………………………….. 10 Some Supreme Court Judgments / Orders of Public Importance…...…... 11 - 25 Some Major Events........................................………………………….…... 26 - 27 Foreign Delegations in the Supreme Court………………………….…..... 28 Major activities of National Judicial Academy (NJA)……………………… 29 - 31 Major activities of National Legal Services Authority (NALSA)………….. 32 Some Important Visits and Conferences ………………………………….. 33 - 36 This newsletter is intended to provide public access to information on the activities and achievements of the Indian Judiciary in general. While every care has been taken to ensure accuracy and to avoid errors/omissions, information given in the newsletter is merely for reference and must not be taken as having the authority of, or being binding in any way on, the Editorial Board of the newsletter and the officials involved in compilation thereof, who do not owe any responsibility whatsoever for any loss, damage, or distress to any person, whether or not a user of this publication, on account of any action taken or not taken on the basis of the information given in this newsletter. 2 COURT NEWS, OCTOBER – DECEMBER, 2018 APPOINTMENTS AND RETIREMENTS IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA (FROM 01-10-2018 TO 31-12-2018) APPOINTMENTS S.No. Name of the Hon’ble Judge Date of Appointment 1 Hon’ble Mr.
[Show full text]
12 Important Supreme Court Judgments April 16, 2019
12 Important Supreme Court Judgments April 16, 2019 firstlaw.in/2019/04/16-important-supreme-court-judgments.html 1. Ashatai v. Shriram City Union Finance Ltd. The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 - Section 21 (b) - The Insurance Act, 1938 - Section 64 VB (2) - the deceased husband of the Appellant had paid the insurance premium by a Demand Draft in favour of the Insurance Company. This has been acknowledged in paragraph 4(c) of the Revision Petition filed by the Respondent – Finance Company, as referred to above. As a consequence, the risk would be covered from the date of payment of the insurance premium. The loan was secured from the date on which the insurance premium was paid. The premium having been paid by the Appellant’s husband during his lifetime, the loan was to be adjusted from the insurance policy. The National Commission has erroneously set aside the Order passed by the State Commission on factually incorrect grounds. The Appellant has made out a clear case of deficiency of service on the part of the Respondent – Finance Company. Case Number : C.A. No. 3962 of 2019 16-04-2019 Petitioner's Advocate : Amol Nirmalkumar Suryawanshi Bench : Hon'ble Mr. Justice Uday Umesh Lalit, Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indu Malhotra Judgment By : Hon'ble Ms. Justice Indu Malhotra 2. Dr. R.S. Grewal v. Chander Parkash Soni The Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - Section 14 (1) - The East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Section 2 (c) - ‘Landlord' - Property of a female Hindu to be her absolute property - A landlord within the meaning of Section 2(c) is not necessarily the owner of the property.
[Show full text]
Supreme Court of India Landmark Judgments
For Private Circulation : Educational Purpose Only India has a strong tradition of respect for difference and diversity which is reflected under the Hindu Family Laws as it is applicable to diverse communities living from the southern tip to northern mountains, from western plains to eastern hills. Hon'ble Mr. Justice N.V. Ramana Ratanlal alias Babulal Chunilal Samsuka Versus Sundarabaigovardhandas Samsuka (Dead) through Legal Representatives and ors. Decided on 22 November, 2017 (para-13) COMPILATION OF LANDMARK JUDGMENTS OF SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON FAMILY MATTERS “While considering the paramount interest and welfare of the minor child, maintenance, education and the loving care that the child would receive are the factors to be kept in view.” Hon’ble Mrs. Justice R. Banumathi Kalaichezhiyan Srinivasan Versus Nirmala O.S.A.No.255 of 2011 Decided on 15 September, 2011(Para-10) For Private Circulation : Educational Purpose Only COMPILATION OF LANDMARK JUDGMENTS OF SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ON FAMILY MATTERS Year of Publication : 2019 Compiled By Jharkhand State Legal Services Authority Nyaya Sadan, Near AG Office, Doranda, Ranchi – 834002 Ph No. 0651-2482392, 2481520, 2482397 (F) E-mail :[email protected], Website : www.jhalsa.org This is booklet is also available on Official Website of JHALSA “www.jhalsa.org” HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA Judge, Supreme Court of India & Chairman, Supreme Court Legal Services Committee HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE R. BANUmathi Judge, Supreme Court of India & Chairperson, Supreme Court Committee for Sensitization of Family Court Matters HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDIRA BANERJEE Judge, Supreme Court of India & Member, Supreme Court Committee for Sensitization of Family Court Matters HON’bLE MR.
[Show full text]