DOCSLIB.ORG

2003/2004 Annual Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2003/2004 Annual Report I PACIFIC ISLANDS FORUM SECREfARIAT 2003-2004 ANNUAL REPORT Excelling together for the people of the Pacific Motto - Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat ",,'.'oKl i,Jtlf,i ~. J'U~ , Paci fi c Islands Fo rum S e ': r e lt a ri ~ 1 2003/200 4 A nn u a • u \. I • u ~ A Review of the Forum, and its Secretariat, was carried out by an Eminent Persons Group in late 2003, in line with a decision by Pacific Islands Forum Leaders at their meeting in Auckland, New Zealand in August, 2003. The Eminent Persons, who also met with former Forum SeGretary General, Noel Levi, CBE (third from left) during their extensive consultations were (L·R): Bob Cotton, . Dr Lang; Kavaliku, M aiava lula; Toma, Sir Julius Chan and Teburoro Tito. o L I Pacific Islands Forum Secreta ri at 200 3/20 04 Ann u a l R e p o rt EX ECU TI VE S U MMARY The Pacific Way to a Pacific Plan A generation ago, seven Pacific Leaders Biketawa Declaration that, for the first acted on their vision for a more sec ure time, gave Foru m members a number future for the people of th e Pacific, of guiding principles and measures to by esta blishing th e Pacific Islands take in the event of a crisis affecting the Forum in August 1971. Th ei r aim was region . These initiati ves underscore th e to cooperate regionally on com mon leve l of cooperation and consultation concern s, thereby maki ng th e most of that is required as we face up to new what was often very li ttle in te rm s of challenges. reso urces. Th is yea r, we joined you in Forum Lead ers envisage that th e mou rning the last of the original Forum deve lopment of the Pacific Plan w il l co-founders, the late Ratu Sir Kami sese be a dynami c process, ex tend i ng M ara, who left us in April. over an as yet un specified number of A great leader of the region, Ratu Mara was a strong yea rs. Th e wo rk will initiall y seek to in crease cooperati on advocate of th e Pacific Way, a philosophy tha t guided the at sectoral levels and encourage more effec ti ve worki ng reg ion's approach to political, economic and socia l issues. relationships among regional organ isations. A framework for Days before Ratu Mara died, a new generation of Pacific th e development ofthe Plan w ill be presented to th e Lead ers Islands Forum Lea ders met in a Special Lea ders retreat in at their meeting. in Apia in August 2004. Au ckland, New Zea land to give the Forum a refres hed The Eminent Perso ns Group Report, on w hi ch th e Leaders mandate and a new vision. The Lea ders focused on fo ur key decisions are based, noted that there is considerable scope areas - economic growth , sustainabl e development, good for enhanced cooperation and a more co mprehensive governance and secu ri ty ~ and ca ll ed for stru ctured measures regional approach to shared security interests and suggested to address them. a number of areas for greater shared"effort and the pooling In effect, th e Pacific Way has fo und new express ion in a of resource s. Pacific Plan. There is much work to be done to justify the faith Some of th is already exists, such as is evident in the work placed in us by our founders and the ci tizens of the Forum. of th e Council of Regional O rga nisations in the Pacific Thi s is, of course, a very exci tin g time to be worki ng (CROP), of whi ch the Forum Secretariat is a member. Other with th e Forum fam ily, and it is, for me, a ve ry welcome opportuniti es for pooling of resources wi ll require innovative coincidence that I began my term as Secretary General just approaches, and a great deal of thinking outside the box. as the Forum was exa mining its sense of mission. Leaders Regional cooperation w ill be as strong and vibrant as have cl ea rl y placed a continuing high va lue on the Forum and members want it to be. Apart from the opportunities before on its releva nce to their national and regional interests, and us, there are clea rl y a number of daunting challenges, quite much effort has been invested in see ing that the Pacific Plan, a few of them not of our making. And the most complex however it evolves, becomes a positive force in th eir li ves. chall enges, whether they are in gove rn ance or economi c For th is to happen, it is essential that we justify th e support reform, are the ones we need to se riously tackle before the shown to us by our members and strategic partners. There is a si tuation, as ca n so metimes happen, gets out of hand. very simple issue that must guide our work - are we making a The tem ptation to change nothi ng does not mean th at positive difference in the lives of our communiti es? Rega rdless nothing w il l change. Internally, factors such as population of the policies and programmes we come up w ith, if we do growth wi ll guarantee more press ure on ou r sc hools, not act in the best interests of our own peopl e, then we are roads and hosp itals. Externall y, the process we know as wastin g yo ur ti me and your money. globali sation is here to stay and none of us are immune from In my first Report to Leaders, I wish to acknowledge the its impacts. Trying to make the best use of it, in a way that work of my predecessor, Noel Levi of Papua New Guinea, who converts the process into a positive force for the benefit of did much to maintain the Forum 's focus on the core iss ues of the people of the region is, th e only way to go. national and regional development. During his steward ship, For reasons which w ill be known to all of you the region the Forum pu shed through a wide range of regional in itiatives, has come under particular scru tiny of late and, whether we among them, th e PAC ER economic cooperation and PICTA agree or not, it has done so, for many of the wro ng rea so ns. free trade agreements. Leaders also adopted the landmark Th ere has been scrutiny of the Forum itse lf and of its abil ity Pacific Islan ds Forum Secretariat 2003/2004 Annual R e port to respond effective ly to challenges fa cing th e region and, to ass ist a fell ow member in cri sis. There remain s much to beyond that, its ability to ensure, as best it may, that th e proper do in Solomon Islands and we look forward to playing an groundwork is laid for susta ined prosperity and stability in ongoing role in this important work. the reg ion. At annual Forums since the mid-1990s, Forum member Leaders have also recognised that theirVision for the Pac ific states have co mmitted themselves to more effective ca nnot be achieved by Governments alone, but ca n on ly be governance. Specific undertaki ngs have been made to ensure attained on a platform of broader partnersh ips. Thi s principle th at th e management of mem ber co untri es' resourc es is more invites wider consu ltation on Forum issues, including work in g open, transpare nt, accountabl e, equ itable and respons ive to with non-member stakeholders such as our development peop le's needs. partn ers, the media and civil society. We saw exa mples of Th e 1997 Forum Economic Ministers Meeting (FEMM) wider engagement at this yea r's Forum Eco nomi c Ministers Prin ciples ofAcco untability provided guidelines for the proper Meeting in Rotorua\ New Zea land, where represe ntati ves management of public funds. The Biketawa Declaration from the private sector provided usefu l insights into the links highlights th e "Commitment to good governance which is between policy on paper, an d practice on the ground. At the th e exercise of authority (lea ders hip) and interacti ons in a Forum Regional Security Committee meeting in Nadi, Fi ji, mann er that is open, transpa rent, acco untable, parti cipatory, invited spea kers provided a fres h perspective on th e issue of consu ltative and decisive but fai r and equitabl e." Last yea r, governance in deve loping countri es. Thi s approach to ou r Forum Leaders adopted Principles of Good Leadership, wh ich work will, I hope, give our work a much broader relevance take into account both tradi tional Pacific va lues and the to the community. It is essentia l that other major partners Forum Leaders' co mmitment to the principles contai ned in - non-state actors, community groups an d other policymakers the Biketawa Declaration. The Secretariat is also supporting - share our sense of the intimate co nn ection between legislative reform in member countries through the annual key iss ues such as governan ce, economi c developm en t, Forum Presiding Officers Conference.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pacific Islands Forum Statement for the 2Nd Committee General Debate
    CHECK AGAINST DELIVERY PACIFIC ISLANDS FORUM STATEMENT FOR THE 2ND COMMITTEE GENERAL DEBATE Monday, 5 October 2020 Mr. Chairman, I have the honour to deliver this statement on behalf of the 14 Pacific Island Forum countries with Missions to the United Nations, namely Australia, Federated States of Micronesia, Fiji, Kiribati, Nauru, New Zealand, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Republic of Marshall Islands, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga, Vanuatu and my own country Tuvalu. At the outset, allow me to congratulate you Mr. Chair and members of your Bureau for your successful election. I also like to commend you for your courage, creativity, and tireless efforts in proceeding with the preparations of the 2nd Committee work as planned at these unprecedented times. Mr. Chairman, The Pacific Islands Forum welcomes the theme for the 2nd Committee’s general debate this year – “Building back better after COVID-19: ensuring a more equitable global economy, inclusive societies and sustainable recovery.” It is without a doubt COVID-19 has significantly disrupted economies and societies right across the world. Our Pacific Leaders recognised it as a major crisis for the Blue Pacific region – its peoples, countries and economies. Its effects will be felt for years to come, exacerbating our existing regional development challenges. We believe that the 2nd Committee is the right place to provide guidance to ensure the necessary CHECK AGAINST DELIVERY implementation of actions are taken to address our development challenges. By ensuring a more equitable global economy, inclusive societies and sustainable recovery we must rethink, plan, collaborate and work collectively to address these challenges at the national, regional and global levels.
    [Show full text]
  • The Southwest Pacific: U.S
    Order Code RL34086 The Southwest Pacific: U.S. Interests and China’s Growing Influence July 6, 2007 Thomas Lum Specialist in Asian Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Bruce Vaughn Specialist in Asian Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division The Southwest Pacific: U.S. Interests and China’s Growing Influence Summary This report focuses on the 14 sovereign nations of the Southwest Pacific, or Pacific Islands region, and the major external powers (the United States, Australia, New Zealand, France, Japan, and China). It provides an explanation of the region’s main geographical, political, and economic characteristics and discusses United States interests in the Pacific and the increased influence of China, which has become a growing force in the region. The report describes policy options as considered at the Pacific Islands Conference of Leaders, held in Washington, DC, in March 2007. Although small in total population (approximately 8 million) and relatively low in economic development, the Southwest Pacific is strategically important. The United States plays an overarching security role in the region, but it is not the only provider of security, nor the principal source of foreign aid. It has relied upon Australia and New Zealand to help promote development and maintain political stability in the region. Key components of U.S. engagement in the Pacific include its territories (Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and American Samoa), the Freely Associated States (Marshall Islands, Micronesia, and Palau), military bases on Guam and Kwajalein atoll (Marshall Islands), and relatively limited aid and economic programs. Some experts argue that U.S. involvement in the Southwest Pacific has waned since the end of the Cold War, leaving a power vacuum, and that the United States should pay greater attention to the region and its problems.
    [Show full text]
  • European Union - the Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat
    Ref. Ares(2015)2773568 - 02/07/2015 European Union - The Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat Pacific Regional Indicative Programme for the period 2014-2020 GENERAL CLAUSES The European Commission on behalf of the European Union and the Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat hereby agree as follows: (1) The European Commission, (represented by Neven Mimica, Commissioner for International Cooperation and Development) and the Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat, (represented by Dame Meg Taylor, Secretary General and Regional Authorising Officer) hereinafter referred to as the Parties, determined the general orientations for cooperation for the period 2014 - 2020. These orientations which are included in the Regional Indicative Programme concern the European Union Aid in favour of the Pacific region and were drawn up in accordance with the provisions of Articles 2 and 4 of Annex IV to the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement, signed in Cotonou on 23 June 2000, revised and signed in Luxemburg on 25 June 2005 and revised and signed in Ouagadougou on 22 June 2010. The Pacific Regional Indicative Programme is annexed to the present document. (2) As regards the indicative programmable financial resources which the European Union envisages to make available to the Pacific region for the period 2014 - 2020, an amount of EUR 166 million is foreseen for the allocation referred to in Article 3.2 (a) of Annex IV of the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement (A-allocation). A B­ allocation referred to in Article 3.2 (b) can be established to cover unforeseen needs. This allocation is at EUR 0 until a need arises. These allocations are not entitlements and may be revised by the Commission, following the mid-term and end-of-term reviews, in accordance with Article 5.7 of annex IV of the ACP-EC Partnership Agreement.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Report September 2003
    Country Report September 2003 Samoa September 2003 The Economist Intelligence Unit 15 Regent St, London SW1Y 4LR United Kingdom The Economist Intelligence Unit The Economist Intelligence Unit is a specialist publisher serving companies establishing and managing operations across national borders. For over 50 years it has been a source of information on business developments, economic and political trends, government regulations and corporate practice worldwide. The Economist Intelligence Unit delivers its information in four ways: through its digital portfolio, where the latest analysis is updated daily; through printed subscription products ranging from newsletters to annual reference works; through research reports; and by organising seminars and presentations. The firm is a member of The Economist Group. London New York Hong Kong The Economist Intelligence Unit The Economist Intelligence Unit The Economist Intelligence Unit 15 Regent St The Economist Building 60/F, Central Plaza London 111 West 57th Street 18 Harbour Road SW1Y 4LR New York Wanchai United Kingdom NY 10019, US Hong Kong Tel: (44.20) 7830 1007 Tel: (1.212) 554 0600 Tel: (852) 2585 3888 Fax: (44.20) 7830 1023 Fax: (1.212) 586 0248 Fax: (852) 2802 7638 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.eiu.com Electronic delivery This publication can be viewed by subscribing online at www.store.eiu.com Reports are also available in various other electronic formats, such as CD-ROM, Lotus Notes, online databases and as direct feeds to corporate intranets. For further information, please contact your nearest Economist Intelligence Unit office Copyright © 2003 The Economist Intelligence Unit Limited.
    [Show full text]
  • The United States' Indo–Pacific Strategy and a Revisionist China
    The United States’ Indo–Pacific Strategy and a Revisionist China: Partnering with Small and Middle Powers in the Pacific Islands Region By Patrick Dupont ISSUES & INSIGHTS WORKING PAPER V O L . 2 1 , WP2 | F e b r u a r y 202 1 Pacific Forum Based in Honolulu, the Pacific Forum (www.pacforum.org) is a foreign policy research institute focused on the Asia-Pacific Region. Founded in 1975, the Pacific Forum collaborates with a broad network of research institutes from around the Pacific Rim, drawing on Asian perspectives and disseminating project findings and recommendations to global leaders, governments, and members of the public throughout the region. The Forum’s programs encompass current and emerging political, security, economic, and maritime policy issues, and works to help stimulate cooperative policies through rigorous research, analyses and dialogues. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................... IV 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 2. THE UNITED STATES’ INDO–PACIFIC STRATEGY .............................................. 2 3. ASSESSING US INFLUENCE IN THE PACIFIC ISLANDS REGION ......................... 3 4. ASSESSING CHINESE INFLUENCE IN THE PACIFIC ISLANDS REGION ............. 11 5. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE UNITED STATES ....................................................... 24 6. SMALL AND MIDDLE POWERS IN THE PACIFIC ISLANDS REGION .................. 27 7. CONCLUSIONS
    [Show full text]
  • Pacific Islands: Development Vulnerabilities, International Journal Response and Structural Transformation
    Bolesta, A. (2020). Pacific islands: Development vulnerabilities, international Journal response and structural transformation. Journal of International Studies, 13(3), 25-40. of International doi:10.14254/2071-8330.2020/13-3/2 Studies © Foundation Pacific islands: Development of International Studies, 2020 vulnerabilities, international response and © CSR, 2020 Papers Scientific structural transformation Andrzej Bolesta1 United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific ORCID 0000-0003-2298-6133 Abstract. The goal of this paper is, upon presenting Pacific island countries’ Received: January, 2020 development challenges and vulnerabilities, to examine and propose possible 1st Revision: policy solutions. In view of very particular development challenges related to May, 2020 economic, environmental and social vulnerabilities, the discussion is taking place Accepted: August, 2020 concerning (a) the content of the UN programmes of actions to support small island developing States (SIDS); (b) the genus of their preferred structural DOI: economic transformation and (c) the supporting economic policies. This paper 10.14254/2071- argues that in order to address various development predicaments of small island 8330.2020/13-3/2 developing State (a) international community must be engaged in the areas described in the UN programmes of action, as some environmental and economic challenges such as climate change, environmental degradation and external economic shocks cannot be addressed exclusively through domestic policies; (b) particular type of structural economic transformation must take place, which deviates from the traditional path from agriculture to industry and to services, since for the overwhelming majority of SIDS manufacturing is not a viable option due to their remote location and small population, which make them unattractive for international investments and thus regional and global value chains; (c) the specific type of structural transformation must be underpinned by effective economic policies focusing on building resilience.
    [Show full text]
  • Du Cericentre De Recherches
    les études du Ceri Centre de Recherches Internationales One Among Many: Changing Geostrategic Interests and Challenges for France in the South Pacific Denise Fisher One Among Many: Changing Geostrategic Interests and Challenges for France in the South Pacific Abstract France, which is both an external and resident South Pacific power by virtue of its possessions there, pursues, or simply inherits, multiple strategic benefits. But the strategic context has changed in recent years. China's increased presence; consequent changes in the engagement of the US, Japan and Taiwan; and the involvement of other players in the global search for resources, means that France is one of many more with influence and interests in a region considered by some as a backwater. These shifts in a way heighten the value of France's strategic returns, while impacting on France's capacity to exert influence and pursue its own objectives in the region. At the same time, France is dealing with demands for greater autonomy and even independence from its two most valuable overseas possessions on which its influence is based, New Caledonia and French Polynesia. How it responds to these demands will directly shape the nature of its future regional presence, which is a strategic asset. Une puissance parmi d'autres : évolution des enjeux et défis géostratégiques de la France en Océanie Résumé Compte tenu des territoires qu’elle y possède encore, la France est en Océanie une puissance à la fois locale et extérieure. A ce titre, et quand elle ne se contente pas de bénéficier d’avantages hérités, elle poursuit des objectifs stratégiques multiples.
    [Show full text]
  • Australia, the Southwest Pacific, and United States Interests
    Order Code RL32187 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web Australia, the Southwest Pacific, and United States Interests January 7, 2004 name redacted and name redacted Analysts in Asian Affairs Foreign Affairs, Defense, and Trade Division Congressional Research Service ˜ The Library of Congress Australia, the Southwest Pacific, and United States Interests Summary The major U.S. interests in the Southwest Pacific are preventing the rise of terrorist threats, working with and maintaining the region’s U.S. territories, commonwealths, and military bases (American Samoa, Guam, the Northern Mariana Islands, and the Reagan Missile Test Site on Kwajalein Atoll in the Marshall Islands), and enhancing U.S.-Australian cooperation in pursuing mutual political, economic, and strategic objectives in the area. The United States and Australia share common interests in countering transnational crime and preventing the infiltration of terrorist organizations in the Southwest Pacific, hedging against the growing influence of China, and promoting political stability and economic development. The United States has supported Australia’s increasingly proactive stance and troop deployment in Pacific Island nations torn by political and civil strife such as East Timor, Papua New Guinea, and the Solomon Islands. Australia may play a greater strategic role in the region as the United States seeks to redeploy its Asia-Pacific force structure. This report will be updated as needed. Contents U.S. Interests in the Southwest Pacific .................................1 The Evolving U.S.-Australian Strategic Relationship......................2 Australia’s Role in the Region........................................5 China’s Growing Regional Influence...................................6 List of Figures Figure 1. Map of the Southwest Pacific ................................7 Australia, the Southwest Pacific, and United States Interests U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The G20 and Its Outreach: New Measures of Accountability, Legitimacy and Success
    The G20 and its outreach: new measures of accountability, legitimacy and success Dr Susan Harris Rimmer1 Australian National University Introduction The world economy is changing rapidly. In August 2013, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) reported that for the first time in recorded history, the combined gross domestic product of emerging and developing markets, adjusted for purchasing price parity, has eclipsed the combined measure of advanced economies.2 The global economy is still fragile. The rise of China and the BRICS nations (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) is leading international relations scholars to debate whether a new international order is emerging. The effectiveness/efficiency claims of the G20 have been built on the idea of a small, compact and self-selected membership which can move relatively quickly to make decisions. However, the legitimacy of a global governance actor usually rests on broad claims of representation, or a universal mandate (an example is the United Nations). The solution for the G20 is to keep its current membership, but improve its outreach to a greater number and wider array of state, private sector and civil society actors, and increase accountability measures at the leader level. The G20 leaders’ summit is a new entity in international relations, only five years old. The G20 itself can be seen as the product of outreach by the Group of 8, facing challenges to its own legitimacy during the global financial crisis. In the last five years the G20 has become an important new global governance actor, dealing with crises, and urging coordination to promote sustainable and balanced growth.
    [Show full text]
  • Strengthening Regional Cooperation and Integration in Asia
    CHAPTER 15 STRENGTHENING REGIONAL Cooperation AND Integration IN ASIA 15.1 Introduction Regional cooperation and integration (RCI) refers to policies and initiatives of countries in a region to engage in close economic cooperation and promote the integration of their economies, especially through trade and investment. RCI has played an important role in supporting Asian development over the past half century. It contributed to the region’s peace and stability, promoted intraregional trade and investment, and supported the provision of regional public goods— in particular, controlling transboundary environmental pollution (for example, in rivers and the haze), combating communicable disease, and preventing financial contagion. RCI in developing Asia has evolved significantly since World War II in terms of country coverage and the scope of cooperation. It was initially motivated by the need to ensure peace and security after years of war and conflict in the region, and to move beyond former colonial links. It was also influenced by the United Nations (UN), initially through the establishment of the Economic Commission for Asia and the Far East (ECAFE) in 1947. 470 | ASIA’S JOURNEY to ProspERITY—CHAPTER 15 Over time, RCI became homegrown and expanded to more areas, including research, education, and capacity development; development financing; trade and investment; money and finance; and responding to common regional challenges. The Asian Development Bank (ADB) continues to promote RCI across many subregions. This chapter discusses the institutional evolution of RCI in Asia and the Pacific. Section 15.2 looks at the key motivating factors. Section 15.3 traces the changing drivers that influenced RCI’s evolution in East Asia and Southeast Asia—the subregions that benefited most thus far from regional cooperation and market-driven integration.
    [Show full text]
  • Oecd/Undesa/Unescap Workshop on Developing Sustainability Strategies in Asia
    DRAFT AGENDA OECD/UNDESA/UNESCAP WORKSHOP ON DEVELOPING SUSTAINABILITY STRATEGIES IN ASIA UN Conference Centre, Bangkok, Thailand, 8-9 March 2007 Purpose: This workshop will review national sustainable development strategies (NSDS) in countries in Asia and the Pacific and their relationship to national development plans and poverty reduction strategies (PRS) with a view to better integration. It is co-sponsored by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), the United Nations Division for Sustainable Development (UNDESA) and the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP). Thursday, 8 March 2007 9h00 – 10h00 Opening Remarks • Kim Hak-Su, Executive Secretary, UN Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP) • Kiyo Akasaka, Deputy Secretary-General, OECD • JoAnne DiSano, Director, UN Division for Sustainable Development (UNDESA) 10h00 – 11h00 Session 1: Sustainability and Development in Asia and the Pacific Overview: Rae Kwon Chung, Director, Environment and Sustainable Development Division, UNESCAP Discussants: • Bertrand Fort, Coordinator, Asia Europe Environment Forum (ASEF) • Jan Adams, Australian Ambassador for Environment, Asia Pacific Economic Co-operation (APEC) 11h00 – 11h30 Coffee 11h30 – 13h00 • Greg Urwin, Secretary General, Pacific Islands Forum Secretariat (PIFS) • Chong Chun Kim, Director General, Presidential Commission on Sustainable Development, Republic of Korea General Discussion 13h00 – 14h30 Lunch Keynote Speaker -- Emil Salim, Chair, Preparatory Committee, World Summit on Sustainable Development (WSSD) 1 14h30 – 16h00 Session 2: Governance Approaches to National Sustainable Development Strategies in Asia and the Pacific Overview: Representative, UNEP Regional Resource Centre for Asia and the Pacific Discussants: • Magarita Roque Songco, Deputy Director General, National Economic and Development Authority, Philippines • B.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Don't Pacific Island Countries' Economies Grow Faster.Pdf
    Pacific Interactions Pasifika in New Zealand – New Zealand in Pasifika Edited by Alastair Bisley Institute of Policy Studies Published in 2008 (online only) http://ips.ac.nz Institute of Policy Studies School of Government Victoria University of Wellington PO Box 600 Wellington © Institute of Policy Studies ISBN 978-1-877347-27-6 IPS/Pub/159 This book is copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study, research, criticism or review, as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced without the permission of the Institute of Policy Studies. Copy editor: Belinda Hill Cover design: Alltex Design Contents List of Figures...............................................................................................................iv List of Maps...................................................................................................................v List of Tables.................................................................................................................v List of Boxes.............................................................................................................. viii Acknowledgements ......................................................................................................ix Introduction –Alastair Bisley.........................................................................................1 1 Emerging Demographic and Socioeconomic Features of the Pacific Population in New Zealand – Paul Callister and Robert Didham ....................13 2 Pacific
    [Show full text]