Serlby Park Academy
Design and Access Statement August 2014 Contents
1.0 Background Security strategy DesignTeam 2.05 Ecological assessment 1.01 Introduction 2.06 Tree survey / arboricultural implications Main Contractor: Kier Education 1.02 The school 1.03 The brief Estate, Nottingham NG7 2SZ. 1.04 The site 3.0 Access statement t +44 (0)115 986 8856 1.05 Consultation Local Planning Authority 3.01 Introduction and policy approach Architects: Nicholas Hare Architects Client 3.02 Policies, legislation and guidance 3 Barnsbury Square, London N1 1JL. Local community, Academy community 3.03 External areas, pedestrian access t +44 (0)20 7619 1670 1.06 Planning policy 3.04 Vehicle access and parking Drop off Landscape Architect: Plincke 3.05 Entrances and reception Tuscany Wharf, 4A Orsman Road , London N1 5QJ . 2.0 Design statement 3.06 Circulation t +44 (0)20 7739 3330 Horizontal movement 2.01 The Control Scheme Vertical movement Structural Engineers: Cundall 2.02 Design evolution 3.07 Means of escape Saffron House, 6-10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Site strategy 3.08 Sanitary accommodation t +44 (0)20 7438 1600 Rights of way 3.09 Finishes Scale and form 3.10 Acoustic design Mechanical and Electrical Engineers: Cundall The main building plan 3.11 Lighting Saffron House, 6-10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. The primary building plan 3.12 Information / signage t +44 (0)20 7438 1600 The secondary phase 3.13 Access statement development Circulation Acoustic Consultant: MACH Acoustics Zoning Trelawney House, Surrey Street, Bristol, BS2 8PS Departments 4.0 Appendix A t +44 (0)117 944 1388 2.03 Materials and elevations Letter of comfort Fire Consultant: Cundall 2.04 Landscape, security and access Landscape masterplan Saffron House, 6-10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Entrance and approach, visitors t +44 (0)20 7438 1600 Entrance and approach, primary pupils Entrance and approach, secondary pupils Informal and social spaces Saffron House, 6-10 Kirby Street, London EC1N 8TS. Hard PE and aider sport strategy t +44 (0)20 7438 1600 Hard materiials palette Planting proposals
Serlby Park Academy - Design and Access Statement August 2014 2 Serlby Park Academy - Design and Access Statement August 2014 3 1.00 Project Background
1.01 Introduction 1.02 The school 1.03 The brief
The proposed Serlby Park Academy is part of the Government’s Serlby Park Academy, sponsored by the Schools Partnership Trust, The Academy has been designed in response to the written The whole Academy is to be accommodated within a single Priority Schools Building Programme (PSBP). The PSBP was will be a through school with pupils aged 3 to 18. The primary brief provided by the EFA, and a control option scheme that was building (notwithstanding the sports facilities in the Leisure launched in July 2011 and is procured by the Education Funding phase will have a capacity for 420 pupils (two form of entry) produced as part of a feasibility study by Jacobs Architecture. The Centre adjacent). The primary and secondary phases are to be Agency (EFA) on behalf of the Department for Education. together with 39 FTE place nursery. The secondary phase will have written brief is made up of a number of documents that collectively largely separated to ensure child safeguarding of the younger pupils. There will however be opportunities to share facilities The PSBP aims to raise standards in education, through a combina- sixth form pupils. The existing school is split between two sites. and take advantage of being located in a single building. tion of investment in buildings and ICT, so that young people can The primary phase, currently located at Shrewsbury Road, Bircotes, general design information and criteria that all schools across the Ensure a smooth transition between phases. Doncaster, DN11 8DD will be relocated on to the existing site of The new building should support the paired classrooms the secondary phase off the Whitehouse Road, Bircotes, Doncaster, structure of the primary phase. This is the Design and Access Statement for the proposed Serlby DN11 8EF. precedence over the former. In addition the Academy has provided The new building should support the departmental structure Park Academy. The Statement aims to explain the design concepts a vision statement that communicates the ethos and aims of the of the secondary phase and facilitate cross-departmental work. and principles that have been applied to the proposed develop- The Academy uses the adjacent Bircotes Leisure Centre for sports school. The new school building aims continue the Academy’s The school is to facilitate extra-curricular teaching and activities, ment and demonstrate how context has informed the scheme. provision. This is facilitated under a Joint-User Agreement (JUA) recent trend of improvement, to deliver its aspirations, and become and encourage community involvement through: It also explains the approach to access that has been developed between Serlby Park Academy and Newark and Bassetlaw District a hub for the local community. - Study support: suitable spaces open before and after and describes the consultation we have undertaken to date and Council (BDC). school to support personalised learning, with access to planned future consultations. The Academy has been designed in response to the vision state- resources and staff support, help and guidance. ment, within the overall framework set by the EFA’s written brief - Clubs and activities: using the specialist facilities particu and feasibility study. The following educational drivers are key to larly in modern and foreign languages and business/ICT, enabling the school to deliver its aims and curriculum, and have with appropriate facilities to accommodate children, and shaped the development of the design: adults of all ages. - The community using and sharing specialist facilities and expertise. The safety and security of all users is paramount; zoning off areas during the day and in the evening must be possible, as well as ensuring one point of entry and exit for all during school hours to meet safeguarding requirements. One central staff social room for the entire Academy should be provided supported by department based staff work rooms management dispersed across the school in highly visible areas to provide passive supervision. The teaching areas will be supported by interactive and technology rich areas. It is important that the design allows advances in technology. The school will cater for students and visitors with a wide range of additional needs, whether learning, behavioural, emotional or physical. Teaching support for those with special educational needs (SEN) will be given within a whole-class setting, in small groups, or individually away from the classroom. Existing Serlby Park artwork Bircotes Leisure Centre View towards the existing senior school main entrance EFA brief: adjacencies diagram
Serlby Park Academy - Design and Access Statement August 2014 4 Serlby Park Academy - Design and Access Statement August 2014 5 1.04 The Site 1.05 Consultation
The existing Serlby Park Academy is located on two sites in Local Planning Authority Local community, Academy community Bircotes. The intention is to decant the primary phase out of its The current proposals have been developed in response to the A public consultation event is to be held at the Academy on current location at Shrewsbury Road and co-locate it with and EFA’s written brief, and the control option scheme that was 4th Sept 2014, hosted by the Academy, the EFA and the Kier secondary phase on the the existing secondary phase site, in an produced as part of the feasibility study by Jacobs Architecture. Education team. all-through school building. The local planning authority’s informal written response to the submitted control scheme, dated 19th March 2014, is included It is hoped that local parents, neighbours and the local press, as The existing school buildings on the secondary phase site are single storey, originally constructed in the 1960s or 1970s using the commence the development of detailed design proposals through out about the proposals and record their opinions and comments CLASP building system. Other accommodation has been added the PSPB ITT (Invitation To Tender) process. on these. over subsequent years. The buildings and external landscaping is in a poor state of repair and considered in the feasibility study to be in The feasibility study established the likely scale, massing and location need of complete replacement. of the new Academy. It also established the requirements of the highways design, with regard to pupil drop off and pedestrian The existing buildings are well set back from the Whitehouse Road. access. In addition, Sport England was consulted, alongside the There is a single point of access from Whitehouse Road with a local planning authority, to establish an agreed approach to sports narrow two-way roadway which serves not only the Academy but provision and community access in the new development. The also an adjacent primary school and the Bircotes Leisure Centre. - On-site car parking for staff and visitors within the school site is tations to date, and the building locations proposed are very similar currently limited and shared with the Leisure Centre car parking to those proposed in the feasibility study. 1.06 Planning policy leading to an unsatisfactory arrangement. Residential properties lie to the south and east of the site. The site has a number of mature The Development Plan documents relevant to the consideration of David Marsh of Nottinghamshire County Council on 16th July this application comprise of: 2014 to discuss the scheme as it developed. The scheme had not deviated greatly from the control scheme so broadly the proposals The Bassetlaw Core Strategy and Development Management were well received in principle. Policies DPD (Adopted December 2011)
Client The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) provides the The detailed proposals for the new Academy have been developed overarching planning guidance to which all Development Plan through a series of weekly client engagement meetings with the documents should comply. EFA and the Academy’s head teacher, Lady Edwards. These meet- ings have been fundamental to understanding the vision of the The proposed development has been designed in accordance with Academy, how they intend to use the spaces, and how best to meet the policies and principles set out within the Development Plan. the EFA’s brief. For full details of the policies relevant to the consideration of this planning application please refer to the Planning Statement. Each week the design evolved in response to the Academy’s Public consultation event held at The Newark Academy, June 2014. feedback to the satisfaction of the Client team. Similar to that proposed for Selby Park on 4th September 2014.
Existing CLASP buildings Existing site plan (north up the page)
Serlby Park Academy - Design and Access Statement August 2014 6 Serlby Park Academy - Design and Access Statement August 2014 7 2.00 Design Statement
2.01 The Control Scheme 2.02 Design evolution
The feasibility study undertaken by the EFA recommended Site strategy roads, parking areas, and paths wherever possible. This a complete re-build of the existing Academy. A three-storey We have worked closely with the EFA, the Academy, and the Reduced planning risks. The layout is roughly similar to the substantial retention of existing hard surfaces has enabled us wider technical team to test the site strategy for the new Serlby feasibility study design and has delivered all of the parking and to propose new landscaped areas that are cost-effective and The new building would have a Gross Internal Floor Area of Park Academy. In doing so we have concluded by endorsing many distance to the neighbour requirements set out in early con- appropriate for a new academy of this size. These principles of 8,708 m². A drop off area for cars within the site was agreed with of the assumptions made in the feasibility study. In particular we sultations with the planners. The proposed design has aimed maximising site assets whilst minimising risks are applicable to Nottinghamshire County Council (NCC). have explored how the superblock school model, close to the to clarify and simplify the overall site organisation to mitigate the approach that we will adopt across the Nottinghamshire sample scheme design for Serlby Park Academy, can be accom- planning risk. PSBP schools. The control option located the new Academy between the existing modated on the site with minimal planning risks and maximum Sport England compliance. The proposals require amendments tennis courts to the north of the existing school buildings, at a organisational advantages. to the existing tennis court areas not envisioned in the feasibil- distance of 82 metres from the nearest residential property to the ity study design. The new tennis court area to the west of the east.. In developing the site strategy with the EFA and the Academy, we building has been rotated through 90 degrees and increased Rights of Way recognised the importance of eight key site planning drivers: in length to offer 4 Lawn Tennis Association (LTA) compliant There are no existing pedestrian rights of way within the applica- The following advantages of using this site were suggested as follows: courts, a betterment on existing. The courts to the east of tion area. The access road into the site off Whitehouse Road is A functional environment. Whilst there is no way to increase the proposed Academy building are retained in their current shared with the neighbouring St. Patrick’s Catholic Primary School. The construction of the new facilities would be able to take the width of the entry roadway the proposed solution does form. The proposed design disposes storm water by the use provide increased staff parking provision and a new car drop of below ground soakaways. This, in addition to proposing As mentioned in the letter of comfort, should land to the north of off for the primary phase as briefed. In addition the Leisure a shorter but wider superblock, frees up space around the - the Contractor. Centre is given its own dedicated parking thus avoiding shared building allowing the same extent of three grass pitches to be ment, pedestrian access to the school from the north would be Following demolition of the existing school buildings and positioned within the school’s secure grounds in comparison acceptable and can be accommodated by the proposed scheme in reinstatement of the site the area formed between London service and emergency vehicle access. Both primary and to the feasibility study design. Refer 1.2.6.4. The area currently the future. Road and the new buildings could create a welcoming secondary phases each have their own approach towards the occupied by the existing school buildings will be returned to a environment to the new school. Academy Building. Where possible the separation of vehicles level grassed area allowing the Academy to develop as ad- The proposed site plan indicates a potential route for this pedes- from pedestrians and cyclists creates a highly functional site trian access, which could be implemented if and when the land is organisation with clear legibility. The clarity of site zoning, the developed as housing. The Leisure Centre car park could be amended to be used as location of the Academy entrances relative to the approaches, Sport England. a primary school drop off facility. and separate Leisure Centre access makes this an accessible Storm water attenuation. The ability to utilize innovative The existing electrical substation could be retained solution that encourages wider community use without SUDS has been explored and integrated into the scheme in Improved segregated pedestrian access will be provided to compromising the Academy’s secure line. a cost-effective and practical way. We have departed from the school. A safe and secure environment. The logical secure lines and the control option by locating the SUDS closer to the new buildings, and proposing the use of crushed material from the and would be situated in an area to the North of the site. eliminating road crossing within the site has not been possible demolition. for the secondary pupils’ pedestrian route, the primary pedes- Ecology. The site is currently of low ecological interest, with Our assessment of the control scheme concluded that the pro- the broad leaved woodland and tall ruderal grassland to the posed location for the new buildings seemed broadly correct but forms part of the secure line thus avoiding gates and barriers west of the existing All Weather Pitch the only habitats of that the approach to the buildings in terms of legibility, separation of on approach to the visitors and secondary phase entrances. note. These areas have been integrated and protected. The pedestrian and vehicular access, and creating an appropriate sense A strong identity and mature environment. The location of site planning affords opportunities for the Academy to further of arrival and frontage could be improved. the new building is intended to create a sense of destination enhance the ecological value in the future by proposing native with clear points of arrival for visitors and secondary pupils into the main building. Arrival to the primary will be clearly sign- seeds to the periphery of amenity grassed areas. posted. Opportunities for branding and logo placement on Creative re-use. We have evolved a scheme that maximises the approach façade are important components in projecting a the retention of existing hard surfaces including entrances, Feasibility study: proposed site plan (north up the page)
Serlby Park Academy - Design and Access Statement August 2014 8 Serlby Park Academy - Design and Access Statement August 2014 9