DOCSLIB.ORG

Mean and SD Archaea Bacteria Genome Size (Mb)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mean and SD Archaea Bacteria Genome Size (Mb) Distributions for kingdom level Primer score mean and SD Genomic GC (%) mean and SD 60 3 2 50 1 Primer score 40 0 Genomic GC (%) Bacteria Bacteria Archaea Archaea kingdom kingdom 16S GC (%) mean and SD Genome size (Mb) mean and SD 65 5 60 4 55 3 16S GC (%) 2 Genome size (Mb) Genome size 50 Bacteria Bacteria Archaea Archaea kingdom kingdom 16S GC (%) Primer score 45 50 55 60 65 0 1 2 3 4 Acidobacteria Acidobacteria Actinobacteria Actinobacteria Aquificae Aquificae Bacteroidetes Bacteroidetes Caldiserica Caldiserica Chlamydiae Chlamydiae Chlorobi Primer scoremeanandSD Chlorobi 16S GC(%)meanandSD Chloroflexi Chloroflexi Chrysiogenetes Chrysiogenetes Crenarchaeota Crenarchaeota Cyanobacteria Cyanobacteria Deferribacteres Deferribacteres Deinococcus−Thermus Deinococcus−Thermus Dictyoglomi Dictyoglomi Elusimicrobia Elusimicrobia phylum phylum Euryarchaeota Euryarchaeota Fibrobacteres Fibrobacteres Firmicutes Firmicutes Fusobacteria Fusobacteria Gemmatimonadetes Gemmatimonadetes Ignavibacteria Ignavibacteria Ignavibacteriae Ignavibacteriae Korarchaeota Korarchaeota Lentisphaerae Lentisphaerae Nanoarchaeota Nanoarchaeota Nitrospirae Nitrospirae Planctomycetes Planctomycetes level phylum for Distributions Proteobacteria Proteobacteria Spirochaetes Spirochaetes Synergistetes Synergistetes Tenericutes Tenericutes Thaumarchaeota Thaumarchaeota Thermodesulfobacteria Thermodesulfobacteria Thermotogae Thermotogae unclassified unclassified Verrucomicrobia Verrucomicrobia Genome size (Mb) Genomic GC (%) 10.0 30 40 50 60 70 2.5 5.0 7.5 Acidobacteria Acidobacteria Actinobacteria Actinobacteria Aquificae Aquificae Bacteroidetes Genome size (Mb)meanandSD Genome size Bacteroidetes Caldiserica Genomic GC(%)meanandSD Caldiserica Chlamydiae Chlamydiae Chlorobi Chlorobi Chloroflexi Chloroflexi Chrysiogenetes Chrysiogenetes Crenarchaeota Crenarchaeota Cyanobacteria Cyanobacteria Deferribacteres Deferribacteres Deinococcus−Thermus Deinococcus−Thermus Dictyoglomi Dictyoglomi Elusimicrobia Elusimicrobia phylum phylum Euryarchaeota Euryarchaeota Fibrobacteres Fibrobacteres Firmicutes Firmicutes Fusobacteria Fusobacteria Gemmatimonadetes Gemmatimonadetes Ignavibacteria Ignavibacteria Ignavibacteriae Ignavibacteriae Korarchaeota Korarchaeota Lentisphaerae Lentisphaerae Nanoarchaeota Nanoarchaeota Nitrospirae Nitrospirae Planctomycetes Planctomycetes Proteobacteria Proteobacteria Spirochaetes Spirochaetes Synergistetes Synergistetes Tenericutes Tenericutes Thaumarchaeota Thaumarchaeota Thermodesulfobacteria Thermodesulfobacteria Thermotogae Thermotogae unclassified unclassified Verrucomicrobia Verrucomicrobia 16S GC (%) Primer score 45 50 55 60 65 0 1 2 3 4 Acidobacteriia Acidobacteriia Actinobacteria Actinobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Anaerolineae Anaerolineae Aquificae Aquificae Archaeoglobi Archaeoglobi Bacilli Bacilli Bacteroidia Bacteroidia Betaproteobacteria Betaproteobacteria Caldilineae Caldilineae Caldisericia Caldisericia Chlamydiia Primer scoremeanandSD Chlamydiia 16S GC(%)meanandSD Chlorobia Chlorobia Chloroflexi Chloroflexi Chrysiogenetes Chrysiogenetes Clostridia Clostridia Cytophagia Cytophagia Deferribacteres Deferribacteres Dehalococcoidetes Dehalococcoidetes Dehalococcoidia Dehalococcoidia Deinococci Deinococci Deltaproteobacteria Deltaproteobacteria Dictyoglomia Dictyoglomia Elusimicrobia Elusimicrobia Epsilonproteobacteria Epsilonproteobacteria Erysipelotrichi Erysipelotrichi Erysipelotrichia Erysipelotrichia class Fibrobacteria class Fibrobacteria Flavobacteriia Flavobacteriia Fusobacteriia Fusobacteriia Gammaproteobacteria Gammaproteobacteria Gemmatimonadetes Gemmatimonadetes Gloeobacteria Gloeobacteria Halobacteria Halobacteria Holophagae Holophagae Ignavibacteria Ignavibacteria Ktedonobacteria Ktedonobacteria Lentisphaeria Lentisphaeria Methanobacteria Methanobacteria Methanococci Methanococci Methanomicrobia Methanomicrobia Methanopyri Methanopyri Mollicutes Mollicutes Negativicutes Negativicutes Nitrospira Nitrospira Opitutae Opitutae Planctomycetia Planctomycetia classlevel for Distributions Solibacteres Solibacteres Spartobacteria Spartobacteria Sphingobacteria Sphingobacteria Sphingobacteriia Sphingobacteriia Spirochaetia Spirochaetia Synergistia Synergistia Thermococci Thermococci Thermodesulfobacteria Thermodesulfobacteria Thermomicrobia Thermomicrobia Thermoplasmata Thermoplasmata Thermoprotei Thermoprotei Thermotogae Thermotogae unclassified unclassified Verrucomicrobiae Verrucomicrobiae Zetaproteobacteria Zetaproteobacteria Genome size (Mb) Genomic GC (%) 10 30 40 50 60 70 0 5 Acidobacteriia Acidobacteriia Actinobacteria Actinobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Alphaproteobacteria Anaerolineae Anaerolineae Aquificae Aquificae Archaeoglobi Archaeoglobi Bacilli Bacilli Bacteroidia (Mb)meanandSD Genome size Bacteroidia Betaproteobacteria Betaproteobacteria Genomic GC(%)meanandSD Caldilineae Caldilineae Caldisericia Caldisericia Chlamydiia Chlamydiia Chlorobia Chlorobia Chloroflexi Chloroflexi Chrysiogenetes Chrysiogenetes Clostridia Clostridia Cytophagia Cytophagia Deferribacteres Deferribacteres Dehalococcoidetes Dehalococcoidetes Dehalococcoidia Dehalococcoidia Deinococci Deinococci Deltaproteobacteria Deltaproteobacteria Dictyoglomia Dictyoglomia Elusimicrobia Elusimicrobia Epsilonproteobacteria Epsilonproteobacteria Erysipelotrichi Erysipelotrichi Erysipelotrichia Erysipelotrichia class Fibrobacteria class Fibrobacteria Flavobacteriia Flavobacteriia Fusobacteriia Fusobacteriia Gammaproteobacteria Gammaproteobacteria Gemmatimonadetes Gemmatimonadetes Gloeobacteria Gloeobacteria Halobacteria Halobacteria Holophagae Holophagae Ignavibacteria Ignavibacteria Ktedonobacteria Ktedonobacteria Lentisphaeria Lentisphaeria Methanobacteria Methanobacteria Methanococci Methanococci Methanomicrobia Methanomicrobia Methanopyri Methanopyri Mollicutes Mollicutes Negativicutes Negativicutes Nitrospira Nitrospira Opitutae Opitutae Planctomycetia Planctomycetia Solibacteres Solibacteres Spartobacteria Spartobacteria Sphingobacteria Sphingobacteria Sphingobacteriia Sphingobacteriia Spirochaetia Spirochaetia Synergistia Synergistia Thermococci Thermococci Thermodesulfobacteria Thermodesulfobacteria Thermomicrobia Thermomicrobia Thermoplasmata Thermoplasmata Thermoprotei Thermoprotei Thermotogae Thermotogae unclassified unclassified Verrucomicrobiae Verrucomicrobiae Zetaproteobacteria Zetaproteobacteria 16S GC (%) Primer score 45 50 55 60 65 0 1 2 3 4 AcholeplasmatalesAcidilobales Acholeplasmatales AcidithiobacillalesAcidimicrobiales AcidimicrobialesAcidilobales Acidobacteriales Acidithiobacillales ActinomycetalesAeromonadales AcidobacterialesActinomycetales Alteromonadales Aeromonadales AnaerolinealesAquificales AlteromonadalesAnaerolineales Archaeoglobales Aquificales BacteroidalesBacillales ArchaeoglobalesBacillales Bacteroidetes Order II. Incertae sedis Bacteroidales BdellovibrionalesBifidobacteriales Bacteroidetes Order BdellovibrionalesII. Incertae sedis Burkholderiales BifidobacterialesBurkholderiales CaldisericalesCaldilineales CaldisericalesCaldilineales CandidatusCampylobacterales Brocadiales CandidatusCampylobacterales Brocadiales CardiobacterialesCaulobacterales Cardiobacteriales Primer scoremeanandSD Caulobacterales CenarchaealesChlamydiales CenarchaealesChlamydiales 16S GC(%)meanandSD Chlorobiales Chlorobiales ChloroflexalesChromatiales ChloroflexalesChromatiales Chroococcales Chroococcales ChrysiogenalesClostridiales ChrysiogenalesClostridiales Coriobacteriales Coriobacteriales DeferribacteralesCytophagales DeferribacteralesCytophagales Dehalococcoidales Dehalococcoidales DesulfarculalesDeinococcales DesulfarculalesDeinococcales Desulfobacterales Desulfobacterales DesulfovibrionalesDesulfurellales DesulfovibrionalesDesulfurellales Desulfurococcales Desulfurococcales DesulfuromonadalesDictyoglomales DesulfuromonadalesDictyoglomales Elusimicrobiales Elusimicrobiales EntomoplasmatalesEnterobacteriales EntomoplasmatalesEnterobacteriales Erysipelotrichales Erysipelotrichales FervidicoccalesFibrobacterales FervidicoccalesFibrobacterales Flavobacteriales Flavobacteriales FusobacterialesGallionellales FusobacterialesGallionellales Gemmatimonadales Gemmatimonadales GloeobacteralesHalanaerobiales GloeobacteralesHalanaerobiales order Halobacteriales order Halobacteriales HerpetosiphonalesHaloplasmatales HerpetosiphonalesHaloplasmatales Holophagales Holophagales HydrogenophilalesIgnavibacteriales HydrogenophilalesIgnavibacteriales Ktedonobacterales Ktedonobacterales LactobacillalesLegionellales LactobacillalesLegionellales Lentisphaerales Lentisphaerales MagnetococcalesMariprofundales MagnetococcalesMariprofundales Methanobacteriales MethanobacterialesMethanocellales MethanococcalesMethanocellales MethanomicrobialesMethanococcales MethanomicrobialesMethanopyrales MethanosarcinalesMethanopyrales MethanosarcinalesMethylacidiphilales MethylacidiphilalesMethylococcales Methylococcales Methylophilales MycoplasmatalesMethylophilales MycoplasmatalesMyxococcales Myxococcales Natranaerobiales NatranaerobialesNautiliales NeisserialesNautiliales Neisseriales Nitriliruptorales NitrosomonadalesNitriliruptorales NitrosomonadalesNitrosopumilales Nitrosopumilales Nitrospirales NitrospiralesNostocales OceanospirillalesNostocales Oceanospirillales Oscillatoriales ParvularculalesOscillatoriales ParvularculalesPasteurellales Pasteurellales Planctomycetales PlanctomycetalesProchlorales PseudomonadalesProchlorales Pseudomonadales Puniceicoccales orderlevel for Distributions PuniceicoccalesRhizobiales Rhizobiales Rhodobacterales RhodobacteralesRhodocyclales
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Spatio-Temporal Study of Microbiology in the Stratified Oxic-Hypoxic-Euxinic, Freshwater- To-Hypersaline Ursu Lake
    Spatio-temporal insights into microbiology of the freshwater-to- hypersaline, oxic-hypoxic-euxinic waters of Ursu Lake Baricz, A., Chiriac, C. M., Andrei, A-., Bulzu, P-A., Levei, E. A., Cadar, O., Battes, K. P., Cîmpean, M., enila, M., Cristea, A., Muntean, V., Alexe, M., Coman, C., Szekeres, E. K., Sicora, C. I., Ionescu, A., Blain, D., O’Neill, W. K., Edwards, J., ... Banciu, H. L. (2020). Spatio-temporal insights into microbiology of the freshwater-to- hypersaline, oxic-hypoxic-euxinic waters of Ursu Lake. Environmental Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14909, https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.14909 Published in: Environmental Microbiology Document Version: Peer reviewed version Queen's University Belfast - Research Portal: Link to publication record in Queen's University Belfast Research Portal Publisher rights Copyright 2019 Wiley. This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher’s policies. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. General rights Copyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Take down policy The Research Portal is Queen's institutional repository that provides access to Queen's research output. Every effort has been made to ensure that content in the Research Portal does not infringe any person's rights, or applicable UK laws. If you discover content in the Research Portal that you believe breaches copyright or violates any law, please contact [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity of Understudied Archaeal and Bacterial Populations of Yellowstone National Park: from Genes to Genomes Daniel Colman
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Biology ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations 7-1-2015 Diversity of understudied archaeal and bacterial populations of Yellowstone National Park: from genes to genomes Daniel Colman Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/biol_etds Recommended Citation Colman, Daniel. "Diversity of understudied archaeal and bacterial populations of Yellowstone National Park: from genes to genomes." (2015). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/biol_etds/18 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Biology ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Daniel Robert Colman Candidate Biology Department This dissertation is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication: Approved by the Dissertation Committee: Cristina Takacs-Vesbach , Chairperson Robert Sinsabaugh Laura Crossey Diana Northup i Diversity of understudied archaeal and bacterial populations from Yellowstone National Park: from genes to genomes by Daniel Robert Colman B.S. Biology, University of New Mexico, 2009 DISSERTATION Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Biology The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico July 2015 ii DEDICATION I would like to dedicate this dissertation to my late grandfather, Kenneth Leo Colman, associate professor of Animal Science in the Wool laboratory at Montana State University, who even very near the end of his earthly tenure, thought it pertinent to quiz my knowledge of oxidized nitrogen compounds. He was a man of great curiosity about the natural world, and to whom I owe an acknowledgement for his legacy of intellectual (and actual) wanderlust.
    [Show full text]
  • Ninety-Nine De Novo Assembled Genomes from the Moose (Alces Alces) Rumen Microbiome Provide New Insights Into Microbial Plant Biomass Degradation
    The ISME Journal (2017) 11, 2538–2551 © 2017 International Society for Microbial Ecology All rights reserved 1751-7362/17 www.nature.com/ismej ORIGINAL ARTICLE Ninety-nine de novo assembled genomes from the moose (Alces alces) rumen microbiome provide new insights into microbial plant biomass degradation Olov Svartström1, Johannes Alneberg2, Nicolas Terrapon3,4, Vincent Lombard3,4, Ino de Bruijn2, Jonas Malmsten5,6, Ann-Marie Dalin6, Emilie EL Muller7, Pranjul Shah7, Paul Wilmes7, Bernard Henrissat3,4,8, Henrik Aspeborg1 and Anders F Andersson2 1School of Biotechnology, Division of Industrial Biotechnology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden; 2School of Biotechnology, Division of Gene Technology, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Science for Life Laboratory, Stockholm, Sweden; 3CNRS UMR 7257, Aix-Marseille University, 13288 Marseille, France; 4INRA, USC 1408 AFMB, 13288 Marseille, France; 5Department of Pathology and Wildlife Diseases, National Veterinary Institute, Uppsala, Sweden; 6Division of Reproduction, Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden; 7Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg and 8Department of Biological Sciences, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia The moose (Alces alces) is a ruminant that harvests energy from fiber-rich lignocellulose material through carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) produced by its rumen microbes. We applied shotgun metagenomics to rumen contents from six moose to obtain insights into this microbiome. Following binning, 99 metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs) belonging to 11 prokaryotic phyla were reconstructed and characterized based on phylogeny and CAZyme profile. The taxonomy of these MAGs reflected the overall composition of the metagenome, with dominance of the phyla Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution and Diversity of Members of the Bacterial Phylum Fibrobacteres in Environments Where Cellulose Degradation Occurs
    Aberystwyth University Distribution and diversity of members of the bacterial phylum Fibrobacteres in environments where cellulose degradation occurs. Ransom-Jones, Emma; Jones, Davey L.; Edwards, Arwyn; McDonald, J. E. Published in: Systematic and Applied Microbiology DOI: 10.1016/j.syapm.2014.06.001 Publication date: 2014 Citation for published version (APA): Ransom-Jones, E., Jones, D. L., Edwards, A., & McDonald, J. E. (2014). Distribution and diversity of members of the bacterial phylum Fibrobacteres in environments where cellulose degradation occurs. Systematic and Applied Microbiology, 37(7), 502-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2014.06.001 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Aberystwyth Research Portal (the Institutional Repository) are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Aberystwyth Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Aberystwyth Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. tel: +44 1970 62 2400 email: [email protected] Download date: 28. Sep. 2021 G Model SYAPM-25635; No. of Pages 8 ARTICLE IN PRESS Systematic and Applied Microbiology xxx (2014) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Systematic and Applied Microbiology j ournal homepage: www.elsevier.de/syapm Distribution and diversity of members of the bacterial phylum Fibrobacteres in environments where cellulose degradation occurs a b c a, Emma Ransom-Jones , David L.
    [Show full text]
  • Expanding the Chlamydiae Tree
    Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 2040 Expanding the Chlamydiae tree Insights into genome diversity and evolution JENNAH E. DHARAMSHI ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS ISSN 1651-6214 ISBN 978-91-513-1203-3 UPPSALA urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-439996 2021 Dissertation presented at Uppsala University to be publicly examined in A1:111a, Biomedical Centre (BMC), Husargatan 3, Uppsala, Tuesday, 8 June 2021 at 13:15 for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. The examination will be conducted in English. Faculty examiner: Prof. Dr. Alexander Probst (Faculty of Chemistry, University of Duisburg-Essen). Abstract Dharamshi, J. E. 2021. Expanding the Chlamydiae tree. Insights into genome diversity and evolution. Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 2040. 87 pp. Uppsala: Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. ISBN 978-91-513-1203-3. Chlamydiae is a phylum of obligate intracellular bacteria. They have a conserved lifecycle and infect eukaryotic hosts, ranging from animals to amoeba. Chlamydiae includes pathogens, and is well-studied from a medical perspective. However, the vast majority of chlamydiae diversity exists in environmental samples as part of the uncultivated microbial majority. Exploration of microbial diversity in anoxic deep marine sediments revealed diverse chlamydiae with high relative abundances. Using genome-resolved metagenomics various marine sediment chlamydiae genomes were obtained, which significantly expanded genomic sampling of Chlamydiae diversity. These genomes formed several new clades in phylogenomic analyses, and included Chlamydiaceae relatives. Despite endosymbiosis-associated genomic features, hosts were not identified, suggesting chlamydiae with alternate lifestyles. Genomic investigation of Anoxychlamydiales, newly described here, uncovered genes for hydrogen metabolism and anaerobiosis, suggesting they engage in syntrophic interactions.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetics of Archaeal Lipids Amy Kelly 9/27/2006 Outline
    Phylogenetics of Archaeal Lipids Amy Kelly 9/27/2006 Outline • Phlogenetics of Archaea • Phlogenetics of archaeal lipids • Papers Phyla • Two? main phyla – Euryarchaeota • Methanogens • Extreme halophiles • Extreme thermophiles • Sulfate-reducing – Crenarchaeota • Extreme thermophiles – Korarchaeota? • Hyperthermophiles • indicated only by environmental DNA sequences – Nanoarchaeum? • N. equitans a fast evolving euryarchaeal lineage, not novel, early diverging archaeal phylum – Ancient archael group? • In deepest brances of Crenarchaea? Euryarchaea? Archaeal Lipids • Methanogens – Di- and tetra-ethers of glycerol and isoprenoid alcohols – Core mostly archaeol or caldarchaeol – Core sometimes sn-2- or Images removed due to sn-3-hydroxyarchaeol or copyright considerations. macrocyclic archaeol –PMI • Halophiles – Similar to methanogens – Exclusively synthesize bacterioruberin • Marine Crenarchaea Depositional Archaeal Lipids Biological Origin Environment Crocetane methanotrophs? methane seeps? methanogens, PMI (2,6,10,15,19-pentamethylicosane) methanotrophs hypersaline, anoxic Squalane hypersaline? C31-C40 head-to-head isoprenoids Smit & Mushegian • “Lost” enzymes of MVA pathway must exist – Phosphomevalonate kinase (PMK) – Diphosphomevalonate decarboxylase – Isopentenyl diphosphate isomerase (IPPI) Kaneda et al. 2001 Rohdich et al. 2001 Boucher et al. • Isoprenoid biosynthesis of archaea evolved through a combination of processes – Co-option of ancestral enzymes – Modification of enzymatic specificity – Orthologous and non-orthologous gene
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Diversity of NTT Nucleotide Transport Proteins in Free-Living and Parasitic Bacteria and Eukaryotes
    Major, P., Embley, T. M., & Williams, T. (2017). Phylogenetic Diversity of NTT Nucleotide Transport Proteins in Free-Living and Parasitic Bacteria and Eukaryotes. Genome Biology and Evolution, 9(2), 480- 487. [evx015]. https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evx015 Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record License (if available): CC BY Link to published version (if available): 10.1093/gbe/evx015 Link to publication record in Explore Bristol Research PDF-document This is the final published version of the article (version of record). It first appeared online via Oxford University Press at https://academic.oup.com/gbe/article/2970297/Phylogenetic. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher. University of Bristol - Explore Bristol Research General rights This document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. Full terms of use are available: http://www.bristol.ac.uk/red/research-policy/pure/user-guides/ebr-terms/ GBE Phylogenetic Diversity of NTT Nucleotide Transport Proteins in Free-Living and Parasitic Bacteria and Eukaryotes Peter Major1,T.MartinEmbley1, and Tom A. Williams2,* 1Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom 2School of Earth Sciences, University of Bristol, United Kingdom *Corresponding author: E-mail: [email protected]. Accepted: January 30, 2017 Abstract Plasma membrane-located nucleotide transport proteins (NTTs) underpin the lifestyle of important obligate intracellular bacterial and eukaryotic pathogens by importing energy and nucleotides from infected host cells that the pathogens can no longer make for themselves. As such their presence is often seen as a hallmark of an intracellular lifestyle associated with reductive genome evolution and loss of primary biosynthetic pathways.
    [Show full text]
  • Expanding Diversity of Asgard Archaea and the Elusive Ancestry of Eukaryotes
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.19.343400; this version posted October 20, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Expanding diversity of Asgard archaea and the elusive ancestry of eukaryotes 2 3 Yang Liu1†, Kira S. Makarova2†, Wen-Cong Huang1†, Yuri I. Wolf2, Anastasia Nikolskaya2, Xinxu 4 Zhang1, Mingwei Cai1, Cui-Jing Zhang1, Wei Xu3, Zhuhua Luo3, Lei Cheng4, Eugene V. Koonin2*, Meng 5 Li1* 6 1 Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Marine Microbiome Engineering, Institute for Advanced Study, Shenzhen 7 University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518060, P. R. China 8 2 National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of 9 Health, Bethesda, Maryland 20894, USA 10 3 State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Marine Genetic Resources, Key Laboratory of Marine Genetic 11 Resources, Fujian Key Laboratory of Marine Genetic Resources, Third Institute of Oceanography, State 12 Oceanic Administration, Xiamen 361005, P. R. China 13 4 Key Laboratory of Development and Application of Rural Renewable Energy, Biogas Institute of 14 Ministry of Agriculture, Chengdu 610041, P.R. China 15 † These authors contributed equally to this work. 16 *Authors for correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected] 17 18 19 Running title: Asgard archaea genomics 20 Keywords: 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.10.19.343400; this version posted October 20, 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenomic Networks Reveal Limited Phylogenetic Range of Lateral Gene Transfer by Transduction
    The ISME Journal (2017) 11, 543–554 OPEN © 2017 International Society for Microbial Ecology All rights reserved 1751-7362/17 www.nature.com/ismej ORIGINAL ARTICLE Phylogenomic networks reveal limited phylogenetic range of lateral gene transfer by transduction Ovidiu Popa1, Giddy Landan and Tal Dagan Institute of General Microbiology, Christian-Albrechts University of Kiel, Kiel, Germany Bacteriophages are recognized DNA vectors and transduction is considered as a common mechanism of lateral gene transfer (LGT) during microbial evolution. Anecdotal events of phage- mediated gene transfer were studied extensively, however, a coherent evolutionary viewpoint of LGT by transduction, its extent and characteristics, is still lacking. Here we report a large-scale evolutionary reconstruction of transduction events in 3982 genomes. We inferred 17 158 recent transduction events linking donors, phages and recipients into a phylogenomic transduction network view. We find that LGT by transduction is mostly restricted to closely related donors and recipients. Furthermore, a substantial number of the transduction events (9%) are best described as gene duplications that are mediated by mobile DNA vectors. We propose to distinguish this type of paralogy by the term autology. A comparison of donor and recipient genomes revealed that genome similarity is a superior predictor of species connectivity in the network in comparison to common habitat. This indicates that genetic similarity, rather than ecological opportunity, is a driver of successful transduction during microbial evolution. A striking difference in the connectivity pattern of donors and recipients shows that while lysogenic interactions are highly species-specific, the host range for lytic phage infections can be much wider, serving to connect dense clusters of closely related species.
    [Show full text]
  • Table S4. Phylogenetic Distribution of Bacterial and Archaea Genomes in Groups A, B, C, D, and X
    Table S4. Phylogenetic distribution of bacterial and archaea genomes in groups A, B, C, D, and X. Group A a: Total number of genomes in the taxon b: Number of group A genomes in the taxon c: Percentage of group A genomes in the taxon a b c cellular organisms 5007 2974 59.4 |__ Bacteria 4769 2935 61.5 | |__ Proteobacteria 1854 1570 84.7 | | |__ Gammaproteobacteria 711 631 88.7 | | | |__ Enterobacterales 112 97 86.6 | | | | |__ Enterobacteriaceae 41 32 78.0 | | | | | |__ unclassified Enterobacteriaceae 13 7 53.8 | | | | |__ Erwiniaceae 30 28 93.3 | | | | | |__ Erwinia 10 10 100.0 | | | | | |__ Buchnera 8 8 100.0 | | | | | | |__ Buchnera aphidicola 8 8 100.0 | | | | | |__ Pantoea 8 8 100.0 | | | | |__ Yersiniaceae 14 14 100.0 | | | | | |__ Serratia 8 8 100.0 | | | | |__ Morganellaceae 13 10 76.9 | | | | |__ Pectobacteriaceae 8 8 100.0 | | | |__ Alteromonadales 94 94 100.0 | | | | |__ Alteromonadaceae 34 34 100.0 | | | | | |__ Marinobacter 12 12 100.0 | | | | |__ Shewanellaceae 17 17 100.0 | | | | | |__ Shewanella 17 17 100.0 | | | | |__ Pseudoalteromonadaceae 16 16 100.0 | | | | | |__ Pseudoalteromonas 15 15 100.0 | | | | |__ Idiomarinaceae 9 9 100.0 | | | | | |__ Idiomarina 9 9 100.0 | | | | |__ Colwelliaceae 6 6 100.0 | | | |__ Pseudomonadales 81 81 100.0 | | | | |__ Moraxellaceae 41 41 100.0 | | | | | |__ Acinetobacter 25 25 100.0 | | | | | |__ Psychrobacter 8 8 100.0 | | | | | |__ Moraxella 6 6 100.0 | | | | |__ Pseudomonadaceae 40 40 100.0 | | | | | |__ Pseudomonas 38 38 100.0 | | | |__ Oceanospirillales 73 72 98.6 | | | | |__ Oceanospirillaceae
    [Show full text]
  • NC10 Phylum Anaerobs? Methanotrophs? Where Can I Find Them?
    NC10 phylum Anaerobs? Methanotrophs? Where can I find them? Beate Kraft Microbial Diversity 2012 Abstract Methylomirabilis oxyfera, the only cultured member of the NC10 phylum performs the newly discovered pathway of NO-dismutation. In this study different habitats were screened for the presence of member of this phylum and the diversity of the sequences obtained was analyzed. Furthermore enrichment cultures for nitrite reduction coupled to methane oxidation were set up. Indeed, the presence of NC10 seems to be associated with nitrite and methane rich fresh water environments. Introduction Recently a new nitrite reduction pathway, NO-dismutation, coupled to methane oxidation has been discovered (Ettwig et al. 2010). In NO-dismutation nitrite is oxidized to NO as in denitrification but then NO dimutated into N2 and O2 instead of being further reduced to N2O. The generated oxygen is then used for methane oxidation. The organism responsible for this process is Methylomirabils oxfera. It is the only cultured member of the candidate phylum NC10. Fig 1: Pathway of NO-dismutation (from Ettwig et al. 2010) It remains open if other members of the NC10 phylum share the same metabolism and respiratory pathway or if they are metabolically more diverse. 16S sequences that fall into the NC10 phylum have been found in mainly oxygen limited freshwater habitats such as lakes including lake sediments, rice paddy soils, wastewater sludge and ditches (Deutzmann and Schink 2011, Luesken et a.l 2011). Their occurrence apparently seem to be correlated with the presence of methane and nitrite in the habitat. This would suggest a similar respiratory pathway as in Methylomirabilis oxyfera.
    [Show full text]
  • Yu-Chen Ling and John W. Moreau
    Microbial Distribution and Activity in a Coastal Acid Sulfate Soil System Introduction: Bioremediation in Yu-Chen Ling and John W. Moreau coastal acid sulfate soil systems Method A Coastal acid sulfate soil (CASS) systems were School of Earth Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia formed when people drained the coastal area Microbial distribution controlled by environmental parameters Microbial activity showed two patterns exposing the soil to the air. Drainage makes iron Microbial structures can be grouped into three zones based on the highest similarity between samples (Fig. 4). Abundant populations, such as Deltaproteobacteria, kept constant activity across tidal cycling, whereas rare sulfides oxidize and release acidity to the These three zones were consistent with their geological background (Fig. 5). Zone 1: Organic horizon, had the populations changed activity response to environmental variations. Activity = cDNA/DNA environment, low pH pore water further dissolved lowest pH value. Zone 2: surface tidal zone, was influenced the most by tidal activity. Zone 3: Sulfuric zone, Abundant populations: the heavy metals. The acidity and toxic metals then Method A Deltaproteobacteria Deltaproteobacteria this area got neutralized the most. contaminate coastal and nearby ecosystems and Method B 1.5 cause environmental problems, such as fish kills, 1.5 decreased rice yields, release of greenhouse gases, Chloroflexi and construction damage. In Australia, there is Gammaproteobacteria Gammaproteobacteria about a $10 billion “legacy” from acid sulfate soils, Chloroflexi even though Australia is only occupied by around 1.0 1.0 Cyanobacteria,@ Acidobacteria Acidobacteria Alphaproteobacteria 18% of the global acid sulfate soils. Chloroplast Zetaproteobacteria Rare populations: Alphaproteobacteria Method A log(RNA(%)+1) Zetaproteobacteria log(RNA(%)+1) Method C Method B 0.5 0.5 Cyanobacteria,@ Bacteroidetes Chloroplast Firmicutes Firmicutes Bacteroidetes Planctomycetes Planctomycetes Ac8nobacteria Fig.
    [Show full text]