DOCSLIB.ORG

I. 2 the Turin King-List Or So-Called Turin Canon (Tc) As a Source for Chronology1

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
I. 2 the Turin King-List Or So-Called Turin Canon (Tc) As a Source for Chronology1 I. 2 THE TURIN KING-LIST OR SO-CALLED TURIN CANON (TC) AS A SOURCE FOR CHRONOLOGY1 Kim Ryholt Introduction The King-list or “Royal Canon of Turin” is the only true king-list pre- served from ancient Egypt before the Ptolemaic period. It is a “true king-list” in the sense that the compiler of the document aimed at recording all of the kings of Egypt along with their reign-lengths. This stands in striking contrast to the other lists, such as the cultic assem- blages of deceased kings engraved on walls in the temples of Sety I and Ramesses II at Abydos and in the tomb of the priest Tjuloy at Saqqara,2 even if these lists preserve the royal names in forms that are superior to those of the more or less contemporaneous TC. Only two studies on the nature of the TC as such have been pub- lished; the first by Redford in 1986,3 and the other by myself in 1997.4 Studies of the chronological implications and attempts at reconstruc- tions of the list have been more numerous. The most significant advances in the reconstruction touch the Late OK, FIP and the SIP.5 Around 1820 Bernardino Drovetti, French Consul in Egypt, acquired the TC, which eventually passed to the Turin Museum. The script is hieratic, written on the reverse of a discarded tax register dating to the reign of Ramesses II. Thus the king-list could have been written at the earliest in the time of Ramesses II himself. The TC can be accurately 1 For detailed discussion of the Turin king-list, see K. Ryholt, Ä&L 14 (2004), 135–155. 2 See Redford, Annals, 18–24. 3 Redford, Annals, 1–18. 4 Ryholt, Situation, 9–33. 5 Late OK: K. Ryholt, ZÄS 127 (2000), 87–100. FIP: J.v. Beckerath, ZÄS 93 (1966), 18–19. SIP: Ryholt, Situation, 69–75, 94–97, 118–119, 151–159, 163–165; for Frg. 134, cf. J. P. Allen, BASOR 315 (1999), 49–50.—W. Helck, SAK 19 (1992), 150–216, pro- posed a series of new arrangements, none of them based on autopsy. I could verify none of them whereas several can definitely be rejected, cf. Ryholt, Situation, 21. Note that Beckerath, Chronologie, 20, follows Helck’s reconstruction. the royal canon of turin 27 described as a copy, drawn up in a somewhat careless manner on waste paper, from a damaged and imperfect original. The scribe apparently did not attempt to supplement missing information from other sources which may have been available at the time.6 Apart from a section cut off in antiquity, the papyrus was presumably intact upon discovery. It has since been reduced to more than 300 fragments, apparently due to rough handling. Since Champollion first saw and described it in 1824, the papyrus has deteriorated considerably. However, thanks to the efforts of several scholars over the past 150 years, most of the larger fragments have now been joined. Yet, many of the very small scraps remain unpublished, and the position of many important fragments remains conjectural. The papyrus has a large format, measuring 42 cm in height and about 1¾ m in length. There are now 11 columns; one or two were lost in antiquity when the piece of papyrus was cut off. It could have included Dyns. 17, 18 and part of Dyn. 19. What follows refers to a new reconstruction, in progress (Table I. 2.1).7 Table I. 2.1. Concordance between Gardiner’s edition and the new reconstruction Column 1 Gardiner col. I Column 2 Includes Frg. 41–42 (Gardiner col. IX) and Frg. 150–152 and Frg. 22+unnumbered fragment (Gardiner col. X) Column 3 Gardiner col. II Column 4 Gardiner col. III Column 5 Gardiner col. IV Column 6 Gardiner col. V Column 7 Gardiner col. VI Column 8 Gardiner col. VII Column 9 Gardiner col. VIII Column 10 Includes Frg. 105+108 (Gardiner, col. IX), Frg. 138 (Gardiner, col. X) and unnumbered fragments (Gardiner, col. X.13–21) Column 11 Gardiner col. XI 6 Thus, for instance, the names of ten late OK kings are lost from TC and the damaged writings of the names of two following kings are intact in the Abydos List. 7 For the new arrangement of the SIP section (columns 7–11) see Ryholt, Situation, 69–75, 94–97, 118–119, 151–159, 163–165..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Los Dos Cuerpos Del Rey: Cosmos Y Política De La Monarquía Egipcia* the Two Bodies of the King: Cosmos and Politics of the Egyptian Monarchy
    Los dos cuerpos del rey: cosmos y política de la monarquía egipcia* The Two Bodies of the King: Cosmos and Politics of the Egyptian Monarchy Antonio J. Morales Freie Universität Berlin Resumen Abstract El estudio de la evidencia textual, The analysis of the textual, icono- iconográfica y arqueológica del antiguo graphic and archaeological evidence in Egipto refleja la geminación de la perso- ancient Egypt reveals the gemination na del monarca. Esta doble naturaleza of the royal persona. This dual nature explica la multiplicidad de imágenes del explains the multiplicity of images of rey en las fuentes oficiales y populares the king in official and popular sources, y justifica la ambigüedad de nuestras and justifies the vagueness of our inter- interpretaciones. En este artículo exa- pretations. In this work I examine the mino el proceso adaptativo de la mo- adaptative process of Egyptian kings- narquía egipcia a diversas condiciones hip to diverse political, social and reli- * El presente artículo es una versión extensa de la conferencia impartida en el marco del Seminario de Historia Antigua «Dioses, héroes y hombres: La divinización del poder en las sociedades antiguas», que tuvo lugar en la Universidad de Sevilla en noviembre de 2013. Mi agradecimiento a Fernando Lozano Gómez, Pedro Giménez de Aragón y Carmen Alarcón Hernández por su amable invitación al seminario y su excelente organización. Agradezco también a Juan Carlos Moreno García (Université Paris-Sorbon- ne) la lectura del borrador de este trabajo y sus comentarios; a José Manuel Galán Allue (CSIC-CCHS, Madrid) por permitirme leer secciones del borrador de su libro (con B.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Egyptian Chronology.Pdf
    Ancient Egyptian Chronology HANDBOOK OF ORIENTAL STUDIES SECTION ONE THE NEAR AND MIDDLE EAST Ancient Near East Editor-in-Chief W. H. van Soldt Editors G. Beckman • C. Leitz • B. A. Levine P. Michalowski • P. Miglus Middle East R. S. O’Fahey • C. H. M. Versteegh VOLUME EIGHTY-THREE Ancient Egyptian Chronology Edited by Erik Hornung, Rolf Krauss, and David A. Warburton BRILL LEIDEN • BOSTON 2006 This book is printed on acid-free paper. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Ancient Egyptian chronology / edited by Erik Hornung, Rolf Krauss, and David A. Warburton; with the assistance of Marianne Eaton-Krauss. p. cm. — (Handbook of Oriental studies. Section 1, The Near and Middle East ; v. 83) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-90-04-11385-5 ISBN-10: 90-04-11385-1 1. Egypt—History—To 332 B.C.—Chronology. 2. Chronology, Egyptian. 3. Egypt—Antiquities. I. Hornung, Erik. II. Krauss, Rolf. III. Warburton, David. IV. Eaton-Krauss, Marianne. DT83.A6564 2006 932.002'02—dc22 2006049915 ISSN 0169-9423 ISBN-10 90 04 11385 1 ISBN-13 978 90 04 11385 5 © Copyright 2006 by Koninklijke Brill NV, Leiden, The Netherlands. Koninklijke Brill NV incorporates the imprints Brill, Hotei Publishing, IDC Publishers, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, and VSP. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, translated, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior written permission from the publisher. Authorization to photocopy items for internal or personal use is granted by Brill provided that the appropriate fees are paid directly to The Copyright Clearance Center, 222 Rosewood Drive, Suite 910, Danvers, MA 01923, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pennsylvania State University Schreyer Honors College
    THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY PERCEPTIONS OF ANCIENT EGYPT THROUGH HISTORY, ACQUISITION, USE, DISPLAY, IMAGERY, AND SCIENCE OF MUMMIES ANNA SHAMORY SPRING 2020 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for baccalaureate degrees in Archaeological Science and Classics and Ancient Mediterranean Studies with honors in Archaeological Science Reviewed and approved* by the following: Claire Milner Associate Research Professor of Anthropology Thesis Supervisor Douglas Bird Associate Professor of Anthropology Honors Adviser * Electronic approvals are on file in the Schreyer Honors College. i ABSTRACT To the general public, ancient Egypt is the land of pharaohs, pyramids, and most importantly – mummies. In ancient times, mummies were created for a religious purpose. The ancient Egyptians believed that their bodies needed to be preserved after physical death, so they could continue into the afterlife. In the centuries after ancient Egypt fell to Roman control, knowledge about ancient Egyptian religion, language, and culture dwindled. When Egypt and its mummies were rediscovered during the Middle Ages, Europeans had little understanding of this ancient culture beyond Classical and Biblical sources. Their lack of understanding led to the use of mummies for purposes beyond their original religious context. After Champollion deciphered hieroglyphics in the 19th century, the world slowly began to learn about Egypt through ancient Egyptian writings in tombs, monuments, and artifacts. Fascination with mummies has led them to be one of the main sources through which people conceptualize ancient Egypt. Through popular media, the public has come to have certain inferences about ancient Egypt that differ from their original meaning in Pharaonic times.
    [Show full text]
  • MUSEOLOGY and EGYPTIAN MATERIAL CULTURE MUSEO EGIZIO, TURIN (ITALY) Course ID: ARCH 365AD June 23 ‒ July 29, 2018 FIELD SCHOOL DIRECTOR: Dr
    MUSEOLOGY AND EGYPTIAN MATERIAL CULTURE MUSEO EGIZIO, TURIN (ITALY) Course ID: ARCH 365AD June 23 ‒ July 29, 2018 FIELD SCHOOL DIRECTOR: Dr. Hans Barnard, MD PhD, Cotsen Institute of Archaeology at UCLA ([email protected]) INTRODUCTION The collection of ancient Egyptian artifacts kept in the Museo Egizio in Turin (Piedmont, Italy) is among the most important in the world. In 1824, King Charles Felix (1765‒1831) of the House of Savoy—that was ruling Savoy, Piedmont, Aosta and Sardinia from Turin at the time—acquired the collection accumulated by Bernardino Drovetti (1776‒1852), the French consul to Egypt. Once in Turin it was housed in a large building in the center of town where it resides until today. The collection was expanded with the purchase of more than 1200 objects gathered by Giuseppe Sossio, in 1833, and the more than 35,000 objects excavated and purchased by Ernesto Schiaparelli (1856‒1928) between 1900 and 1920. In the 1960s, the Nubian Temple of Ellesiya was presented by the Egyptian to the Italian government—to recognize their assistance during the UNESCO campaign to save the Nubian monuments—and rebuilt in the Museo Egizio. Next to this temple, important constituents of the collection include the Old Kingdom Tomb of the Unknown, the New Kingdom Tomb of Kha and Merit, several complete copies of the Book of the Dead, the Turin List of Kings, and the Turin Papyrus Map. The Fondazione Museo delle Antichità Egizie was established in 2004 as the result of an innovative configuration blending private and public funding, which is an experiment in museum management in Italy.
    [Show full text]
  • Ucla Archaeology Field School
    MUSEOLOGY AND EGYPTIAN MATERIAL CULTURE MUSEO EGIZIO, TURIN (ITALY) Course ID: ARCH 365AD SESSION I: June 16 ‒ July 21, 2019 SESSION II: July 28 ‒ September 1, 2019 FIELD SCHOOL DIRECTORS: Dr. Caroline Arbuckle MacLeod, Department of Classical, Near Eastern and Religious Studies, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada ([email protected]) Dr. Hans Barnard, MD PhD, Cotsen Institute of Archaeology at UCLA ([email protected]) INTRODUCTION The collection of ancient Egyptian artifacts kept in the Museo Egizio in Turin (Piedmont, Italy) is among the most important in the world. In 1824, King Charles Felix (1765‒1831) of the House of Savoy—that was ruling Savoy, Piedmont, Aosta and Sardinia from Turin at the time—acquired the collection accumulated by Bernardino Drovetti (1776‒1852), the French consul to Egypt. Once in Turin it was housed in a large building in the center of town where it resides until today. The collection was expanded in 1833, with the purchase of more than 1200 objects gathered by Giuseppe Sossio, and again between 1900 and 1920 with more than 35,000 objects excavated and purchased by Ernesto Schiaparelli (1856‒1928). In the 1960s, the Nubian Temple of Ellesiya was presented by the Egyptian to the Italian government—to recognize their assistance during the UNESCO campaign to save the Nubian monuments—and rebuilt in the Museo Egizio. Next to this temple, important constituents of the collection include the Old Kingdom Tomb of the Unknown, the New Kingdom Tomb of Kha and Merit, several complete copies of the Book of the Dead, the Turin List of Kings, and the Turin Papyrus Map.
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Egyptian Chronology and the Book of Genesis
    Answers Research Journal 4 (2011):127–159. www.answersingenesis.org/arj/v4/ancient-egyptian-chronology-genesis.pdf Ancient Egyptian Chronology and the Book of Genesis Matt McClellan, [email protected] Abstract One of the most popular topics among young earth creationists and apologists is the relationship of the Bible with Ancient Egyptian chronology. Whether it concerns who the pharaoh of the Exodus was, the background of Joseph, or the identity of Shishak, many Christians (and non-Christians) have wondered how these two topics fit together. This paper deals with the question, “How does ancient Egyptian chronology correlate with the book of Genesis?” In answering this question it begins with an analysis of every Egyptian dynasty starting with the 12th Dynasty (this is where David Down places Moses) and goes back all the way to the so called “Dynasty 0.” After all the data is presented, this paper will look at the different possibilities that can be constructed concerning how long each of these dynasties lasted and how they relate to the biblical dates of the Great Flood, the Tower of Babel, and the Patriarchs. Keywords: Egypt, pharaoh, Patriarchs, chronology, Abraham, Joseph Introduction Kingdom) need to be revised. This is important During the past century some scholars have when considering the relationship between Egyptian proposed new ways of dating the events of ancient history and the Tower of Babel. The traditional dating history before c. 700 BC.1 In 1991 a book entitled of Ancient Egyptian chronology places its earliest Centuries of Darkness by Peter James and four of dynasties before the biblical dates of the Flood and his colleagues shook the very foundations of ancient confusion of the languages at Babel.
    [Show full text]
  • Six Papiruses from the Turin Egyptian Museum by Davide Mana
    Six papiruses from the Turin Egyptian Museum by Davide Mana Originally presented as final activity for the MOOC “Ancient Egypt: A history in six objects” by the University of Manchester 2015 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/. Introduction This project focuses on a number of artifacts from the collections of the Museo Egizio (Egyptian Museum) in Turin, Italy. The choice of the Museo Egizio as a source of the materials covered in this article is twofold. The scientific reason is, the Museo Egizio is considered the second most important collection of Egyptian artifacts in the word, after the Cairo Museum. The Museum holds a number of unique pieces, some of which will be featured in this article. There is also a sentimental reason for the choice: the author grew up in Turin, and spent many hours as a kid in the halls of the Egyptian Museum, developing a life-long interest for the history and archeology of Egypt. The Egyptian Museum in Turin, an overview. The House of Savoy fascination for Egyptian antiquities predates the foundation of the museum in Turin; the first items in what was to become the museum collection were excavated in 1759 by Vitaliano Donati, and presented as gift to king Charles Emmanuel III. The Museo Egizio proper was founded by King Charles Felix of Savoy 1824, after the crown acquired the collection of Egyptian artifacts belonging to Bernardino Drovetti, amateur antiquarian and French consul in Egypt under Napoleon.
    [Show full text]
  • The Actions and Effects of Dr. Zahi Hawass
    Wright State University CORE Scholar Browse all Theses and Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2011 Museums and Restitution: The Actions and Effects of Dr. Zahi Hawass Bonnie Jean Roche Wright State University Follow this and additional works at: https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all Part of the Arts and Humanities Commons Repository Citation Roche, Bonnie Jean, "Museums and Restitution: The Actions and Effects of Dr. Zahi Hawass" (2011). Browse all Theses and Dissertations. 1049. https://corescholar.libraries.wright.edu/etd_all/1049 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at CORE Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Browse all Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of CORE Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. MUSEUMS AND RESTITUTION: THE ACTIONS AND EFFECTS OF DR. ZAHI HAWASS A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Humanities By BONNIE JEAN ROCHE Bachelors of Liberal Arts Bowling Green State University, 2008 2011 Wright State University WRIGHT STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES June 10, 2011 I HEREBY RECOMMEND THAT THE THESIS PREPARED UNDER MY SUPERVISION BY Bonnie Jean Roche ENTITLED Museums and Restitution: The Actions and Effects of Dr. Zahi Hawass BE ACCEPTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF Master of Humanities. _________________________________ Donovan Miyasaki, Ph.D. Project Director _________________________________ Ava Chamberlain, Ph.D. Director, Master of Humanities Program Committee on Final Examination: __________________________________ Dawne Dewey, MA. __________________________________ Karla Huebner, Ph.D. __________________________________ Andrew Hsu, Ph.D. Dean, School of Graduate Studies ABSTRACT Roche, Bonnie Jean.
    [Show full text]
  • Archaeology on Egypt's Edge
    doi: 10.2143/AWE.12.0.2994445 AWE 12 (2013) 117-156 ARCHAEOLOGY ON EGYPT’S EDGE: ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH IN THE DAKHLEH OASIS, 1819–1977 ANNA LUCILLE BOOZER Abstract This article provides the first substantial survey of early archaeological research in Egypt’s Dakhleh Oasis. In addition to providing a much-needed survey of research, this study embeds Dakhleh’s regional research history within a broader archaeological research framework. Moreover, it explores the impact of contemporaneous historical events in Egypt and Europe upon the development of archaeology in Dakhleh. This contextualised approach allows us to trace influences upon past research trends and their impacts upon current research and approaches, as well as suggest directions for future research. Introduction This article explores the early archaeological research in Egypt’s Dakhleh Oasis within the framework of broad archaeological trends and contemporaneous his- torical events. Egypt’s Western Desert offered a more extreme research environ- ment than the Nile valley and, as a result, experienced a research trajectory different from and significantly later than most of Egyptian archaeology. In more recent years, the archaeology along Egypt’s fringes has provided a significant contribution to our understanding of post-Pharaonic Egypt and it is important to understand how this research developed.1 The present work recounts the his- tory of research in Egypt’s Western Desert in order to embed the regional research history of the Dakhleh Oasis within broader trends in Egyptology, archaeology and world historical events in Egypt and Europe (Figs. 1–2).2 1 In particular, the western oases have dramatically reshaped our sense of the post-Pharaonic occupation of Egypt as well as the ways in which the Roman empire interfaced with local popula- tions.
    [Show full text]
  • Antonio Lebolo: Excavator of the Book of Abraham
    BYU Studies Quarterly Volume 31 Issue 3 Article 2 7-1-1991 Antonio Lebolo: Excavator of the Book of Abraham H. Donl Peterson Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byusq Recommended Citation Peterson, H. Donl (1991) "Antonio Lebolo: Excavator of the Book of Abraham," BYU Studies Quarterly: Vol. 31 : Iss. 3 , Article 2. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/byusq/vol31/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in BYU Studies Quarterly by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Peterson: Antonio Lebolo: Excavator of the Book of Abraham antonio lebolo excavator of the book of abraham H donl peterson when I1 began teaching classes in the pearl of great price in 1965 at brigham young university I1 spent little class time discussing the historical background of this book of scripture because only limited information was available particularly about the book ofabraham it was commonly believed that the mummies and papyri that came from egypt via ireland were sold to the early church leaders by a michael H chandler a nephew of the excavator joseph smith had translated some of the papyrus manuscripts then all were reportedly burned in the great chicago fire of 18718711 little more was known this much I1 had learned in a graduate class on the pearl of great price taught by james R darkoarkclark author of the story ortheofthe
    [Show full text]
  • Sculpted Glyphs: Egypt and the Musée Charles X: Primary Sources
    Elizabeth Buhe Sculpted Glyphs: Egypt and the Musée Charles X: Primary Sources Nineteenth-Century Art Worldwide 13, no. 1 (Spring 2014) Citation: Elizabeth Buhe, “Sculpted Glyphs: Egypt and the Musée Charles X: Primary Sources,” in Elizabeth Buhe et al., “Sculpted Glyph Published by: Association of Historians of Nineteenth-Century Art. Notes: This PDF is provided for reference purposes only and may not contain all the functionality or features of the original, online publication. Buhe: Sculpted Glyphs: Primary Sources Nineteenth-Century Art Worldwide 13, no. 1 (Spring 2014) Sculpted Glyphs: Egypt and the Musée Charles X: Primary Sources by Elizabeth Buhe Archival Inventories The primary source material for the 3D model of the Musée Charles X consists of inventories of three Egyptian collections acquired by the Louvre between 1824 and 1827 (fig. 1). Fig. 1, Jean-François Champollion, inventory of the Salt collection (1826), page 49, showing Egyptian objects reproduced in the 3D model. Archives des musées nationaux, 7DD*4. [larger image] Annotations on the inventories precisely indicate Champollion’s placement of Egyptian artifacts within each cabinet of the Musée Charles X’s four galleries. Specifically, the marginalia of draughtsman Jean-Léon-Joseph Dubois (1780–1846), who became curator of the museum after Champollion’s death in 1832, provide location references for each object. Because some objects, mostly jewelry, were stolen during the July Revolution and are accompanied by the note “enlevé le 29 juillet 1830,” we know that Dubois’s annotations were made (probably shortly) after that date. The three-dimensional model therefore represents the appearance of the Musée Charles X at that time rather than upon its opening on December 15, 1827.
    [Show full text]
  • Clarity Chronology: Egypt's Chronology in Sync with the Holy Bible Eve Clarity, P1
    Clarity Chronology: Egypt's chronology in sync with the Holy Bible Eve Clarity, p1 Clarity Chronology This Egyptian chronology is based upon the historically accurate facts in the Holy Bible which are supported by archaeological evidence and challenge many assumptions. A major breakthrough was recognizing Joseph and Moses lived during the reigns of several pharaohs, not just one. During the 18th dynasty in which Joseph and Moses lived, the average reign was about 15 years; and Joseph lived 110 years and Moses lived 120 years. The last third of Moses' life was during the 19th dynasty. Though Rameses II had a reign of 66 years, the average reign of the other pharaohs was only seven years. Biblical chronology is superior to traditional Egyptian chronology Joseph was born in 1745 BC during the reign of Tao II. Joseph was 17 when he was sold into slavery (1728 BC), which was during the reign of Ahmose I, for the historically accurate amount of 20 pieces of silver.1 Moses (1571-1451 BC) was born 250 years after the death of the Hebrew patriarch, Abraham. Moses lived in Egypt and wrote extensively about his conversations and interactions with the pharaoh of the Hebrews' exodus from Egypt; thus providing a primary source. The history of the Hebrews continued to be written by contemporaries for the next thousand years. These books (scrolls) were accurately copied and widely disseminated. The Dead Sea Scrolls contained 2,000 year old copies of every book of the Bible, except Esther, and the high accuracy of these copies to today's copies in original languages is truly astonishing.
    [Show full text]