DOCSLIB.ORG

Written Evidence Submitted by Dr. Gül Berna Özcan (XIN0080)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Written evidence submitted by Dr. Gül Berna Özcan (XIN0080) Genocide against Uyghurs in China I am a Reader in International Business and Entrepreneurship at Royal Holloway, University of London and have been with this employment since 1998. Enterprise development in the post-Soviet states of Central Asia is one of my scholarship areas (Özcan, 2006; 2010; 2017, see my relevant publication below). I have conducted numerous fieldwork studies in the region since 2004 (including in Kazakhstan, the Kyrgyz Republic and Uzbekistan). The first phase of my research in Kyrgyzstan was supported by a Nuffiled Foundation grant followed by a Leverhulme Trust Research Fellowship (2005-2007). Throughout these 15+ years, I have come across and interviewed many different ethnic groups in the region. Among these, the Uyghur businesspeople displayed distinct characteristics. They maintained robust cross- border trade and entrepreneurial business ties with Xinjiang, and many had siblings, parents and other close relatives in the region. But, these people also lived in constant fear of being harassed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). Unlike any other groups they were subject to extensive surveillance. This is distinct from the Dungans (ethnic Han Chinese Muslims) who also left China and did not feel threatened or bullied by China in the same way. In 2009, as a Social Science Research Fellow at the American University of Central Asia, I conducted a study on the role of religion and ethnicity in entrepreneurship and visited several Uzbek and Dungan settlements communities and also a Uyghur village. The Uyghur community was in shock as a result of mass arrests and martial law conditions in Xinjiang that followed violent clashes in 2008. Beijing simply described these events as caused by ‘East Turkistan terrorists’ and carried out indiscriminate collective punishment. Marginalised in social status, without access to resources and economic opportunities, Uyghurs and another Turkic minorities in Xinjiang have long been subject to the CCP’s ‘Han-ification’ policies and scapegoating. The current condition continues and amplifies practices that have been applied for decades. Throughout my work, I observed that Uyghur people are overwhelmingly law abiding, industrious and well-versed about their long history and distinct identity (Özcan, 2012). Despite the brainwashing efforts of jihadi groups among some disfranchised youths in Central Asia, the great majority of Uyghurs distance themselves from radical Islamists. I have frequently heard them condemn Salafi ideology as alien to their cultural identity, belief system and practices. Contrary to what the Chinese Communist Party propagates, a great majority of Uyghurs have always been against violent extremism despite decades of extremely harsh and brutal treatment. During my most recent trip in April 2019, I came across a distinctly different state of affairs. My research objective was to assess the local footprint and business practices of Chinese firms in Central Asia with a grant from the Kennan Institute of the Woodrow Wilson Centre where I had been a residential fellow between 2008-20091. I carried out interviews with busines people, government officials and NGO workers in various regions of Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. While exploring Chinese business investments in different regions, Uyghurs 1 See the video of my research talk on “China’s Business in Central Asia: Power and Anxiety” co- sponsored by the Kennan Institute and the Kissinger Institute, Woodrow Wilson Centre, Washington DC (20 February 2020). I also gave a webinar presentation on the persecution of Uyghurs for the British Association for Turkish Area studies on 31 October 2020. 1 who spoke Mandarin helped me to get access to local contractors of Chinese firms. Later I met entrepreneurs and small contractors who maintained family ties and trade with Xingjian. Many of these people related how their brothers, sisters and other relatives vanished in camps. All indicated that a new stage of racist political control and genocide was being committed against Uyghurs and other Turkic Muslim minorities in China. These individuals were under immense stress as they had no channel to communicate with their relatives. Typically, they carried two mobile telephones, one with the WeChat app to talk to their relatives and another with WhatsApp and other western software. They were extremely careful not to share any family information and knew that through direct surveillance the CCP was watching them and their relatives. The spying system the CCP has been operating for a number of years is now perfected with the use of artificial intelligence and other control mechanisms such as bio-data tracking (as documented by Human Rights Watch). At the time I was not fully aware of the character and scale of developments in Xinjiang. These conversations illustrated that female and male family members were taken to concenrtration camps while children vanished into state boarding schools. Kazakh and Kyrgyz people in Xinjiang were also subject to unlawful imprisonment. This led to many protests against China in Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan. Along with systematic racist surveillance and repression, concentration camps tear families and much of the social fabric apart. Heart breaking stories I heard support other evidence from Human Rights Watch, The China Cables, obtained by the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists, and related scholarship. All of these confirm systematic and racially motivated collective punishment. This aims to erase Uyghur identity and social consciousness, its social fabric, belief system, language, cultural sites (including cemeteries) and artistic heritage. This systematic attack has been conducted on the orders of the Chinese Communist Party and amounts to genocide according to the United Nations Genocide Convention of 1948. China’s actions and its surveillance capacity poses a great danger for democracies. If tolerated, its practices will give encouragement to authoritarian regimes and will put the lives of minorities in grave danger around the world. Recent events show how the CCP exercises internal repression, as against peoples in Tibet, Hong Kong and Mongolia. With its massive production capacity, China has become a vital market and production site for major western brands and other global firms. This feeds the CCP’s domestic as well as global power. The UK must act to end the race to bottom for profit maximisation at the expense of human rights. I would like to recommend the following actions: 1) The UK should put pressure on international organisations such as the UN Human Rights Council to abide by the Genocide Convention. The UK should also cooperate with the Commonwealth and European nations as well as its NATO allies to put pressure on China. This should aim in the first instance to shut down all detention centres. Chinese authorities must give accounts of missing people. While we know of the abduction of some, including intellectuals and academics such as Rahile Dawut and Ilham Tohti, we call for all the disappeared to be accounted for. It is outrageous that so many family members and especially children have been separated and they should all be united safely. The region should be opened to international observes and the leaders of the Uyghur diaspora. 2 2) The UK should use all diplomatic means through its bilateral and multilateral relations, including with nations which are members of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, to put diplomatic and economic pressure on China. The Commonwealth is one such effective route for coordination. 3) There should be a UK visa and travel ban on Chinese officials (and their close relatives) who have been the key perpetrators and policy makers of this genocide. The China Cables and other sources present evidence on party leaders. The UK can coordinate this policy with the USA and other allies such as Canada, Australia and India. For example, the US introduced sanctions against two local masterminds of this genocide, Chen Quanguo, the top CCP official in Xinjiang, and Zhu Hailun, formerly Chen’s second-in-command in his capacity as deputy Party chief in Xinjiang. 4) Chinese firms and businesspeople who have been providing infrastructure, finance, technological support and management to the CCP’s genocidal practices should be put on a sanctions list. The US Treasury has recently introduced the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Executive Order2 to this end and the UK should cooperate with the US and other allies to make this a coordinated and effective international effort. 5) Many authoritarian regimes side with China and turn a blind eye to the Uyghurs’ plight. Worse, weak international responses to China’s crimes encourages autocrats and dangers freedoms around the world. China benefits from a fragmented western political stance. The UK must support democratic regimes and convince these leaders and their governments about the domestic political liability and future risks of siding with China. Further diplomacy in this direction is necessary especially in Central Asia as well as Bangladesh, India, Pakistan and Turkey. 6) Pure profit maximisation leads to a race to the bottom for regions as well as the environment more broadly. Diversification to developing nations is important to reduce global inequalities but this must not rest on exploitative practices. Government regulation, industry stimulus and investment will play a key role to discourage human rights abuses in Xinjiang as elsewhere.
Recommended publications
  • Rising Sinophobia in Kyrgyzstan: the Role of Political Corruption

    Rising Sinophobia in Kyrgyzstan: the Role of Political Corruption

    RISING SINOPHOBIA IN KYRGYZSTAN: THE ROLE OF POLITICAL CORRUPTION A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY DOĞUKAN BAŞ IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF SCIENCE IN THE DEPARTMENT OF EURASIAN STUDIES SEPTEMBER 2020 Approval of the thesis: RISING SINOPHOBIA IN KYRGYZSTAN: THE ROLE OF POLITICAL CORRUPTION submitted by DOĞUKAN BAŞ in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Eurasian Studies, the Graduate School of Social Sciences of Middle East Technical University by, Prof. Dr. Yaşar KONDAKÇI Dean Graduate School of Social Sciences Assoc. Prof. Dr. Işık KUŞÇU BONNENFANT Head of Department Eurasian Studies Prof. Dr. Pınar KÖKSAL Supervisor Political Science and Public Administration Examining Committee Members: Assoc. Prof. Dr. Işık KUŞÇU BONNENFANT (Head of the Examining Committee) Middle East Technical University International Relations Prof. Dr. Pınar KÖKSAL (Supervisor) Middle East Technical University Political Science and Public Administration Assist. Prof. Dr. Yuliya BILETSKA Karabük University International Relations I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Doğukan Baş Signature : iii ABSTRACT RISING SINOPHOBIA IN KYRGYZSTAN: THE ROLE OF POLITICAL CORRUPTION BAŞ, Doğukan M.Sc., Eurasian Studies Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Pınar KÖKSAL September 2020, 131 pages In recent years, one of the major problems that Kyrgyzstan witnesses is rising Sinophobia among the local people due to problems related with increasing Chinese economic presence in the country.
  • Trapped in a Virtual Cage: Chinese State Repression of Uyghurs Online

    Trapped in a Virtual Cage: Chinese State Repression of Uyghurs Online

    Trapped in a Virtual Cage: Chinese State Repression of Uyghurs Online Table of Contents I. Executive Summary..................................................................................................................... 2 II. Methodology .............................................................................................................................. 5 III. Background............................................................................................................................... 6 IV. Legislation .............................................................................................................................. 17 V. Ten Month Shutdown............................................................................................................... 33 VI. Detentions............................................................................................................................... 44 VII. Online Freedom for Uyghurs Before and After the Shutdown ............................................ 61 VIII. Recommendations................................................................................................................ 84 IX. Acknowledgements................................................................................................................. 88 Cover image: Composite of 9 Uyghurs imprisoned for their online activity assembled by the Uyghur Human Rights Project. Image credits: Top left: Memetjan Abdullah, courtesy of Radio Free Asia Top center: Mehbube Ablesh, courtesy of
  • Resisting Chinese Linguistic Imperialism

    Resisting Chinese Linguistic Imperialism

    UYGHUR HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT SPECIAL REPORT Resisting Chinese Linguistic Imperialism: Abduweli Ayup and the Movement for Uyghur Mother Tongue-Based Education Rustem Shir, Research Associate Logo of the Ana Til Balilar Baghchisi (Mother Tongue Children’s Garden) May 2019 Contents Acknowledgement 4 Introduction 5 1. CCP language policy on education in East Turkestan 6 Foundations of CCP ethnic minority policy 6 Eras of minority language tolerance 9 Primary and secondary school ‘bilingual’ education policy 12 The Xinjiang Class 20 Mandarin as the language of instruction at Xinjiang University 22 Preschool and kindergarten ‘bilingual’ education policy 23 Suppression of the Movement for Uyghur Mother Tongue-Based Education 26 The Hotan Prefecture and Ghulja County Department of Education directives 28 Internment camps 29 Discussion 32 2. ABduweli Ayup and the Movement for Uyghur Mother Tongue-Based Education 36 Upal: Why couldn’t we study Kashgari? 36 Toquzaq: Oyghan! (Wake Up!) 38 Beijing: Our campus felt like a minority region 41 Doletbagh: My sad history repeating in front of me 50 Urumchi: Education for assimilation 55 Lanzhou: Are you bin Laden? 60 Ankara: Ethno-nationalism and a counterbalance 67 Urumchi: For the love of community 72 Lawrence: Disconnected 77 Kashgar: Rise of the Movement for Uyghur Mother Tongue-Based Education 81 Urumchi: Just keep silent 89 Kashgar: You’re going to be arrested 93 Doletbagh Detention Center: No choice, brother 98 Urumchi Tengritagh Detention Center: Qorqma (Don’t be afraid) 104 Urumchi Liudaowan Prison: Every color had disappeared 109 Urumchi Koktagh Prison: Do you want to defend yourself? 124 2 Urumchi/Kashgar: Release and return 127 Kashgar: Open-air prison 131 Ankara: Stateless and stranded 138 Paris: A new beginning 146 3.
  • SCTIW Review

    SCTIW Review

    SCTIW Review Journal of the Society for Contemporary Thought and the Islamicate World ISSN: 2374-9288 February 21, 2017 David Brophy, Uyghur Nation: Reform and Revolution on the Russia-China Frontier, Harvard University Press, 2016, 386 pp., $39.95 US (hbk), ISBN 9780674660373. Since the 1980s, Western scholarship on modern Chinese history has moved away from the narrative of a tradition-bound Middle Kingdom reacting to the dynamism of Japan and the West. A “China-centered” view of modern Chinese history has by now become standard, much to the benefit of historical research.1 In more recent years, Anglophone scholarship on Central Asia has increasingly assumed a comparable orientation, combining indigenous and imperial sources to recenter modern Central Asian history around Central Asian actors. David Brophy’s Uyghur Nation: Reform and Revolution on the Russia-China Frontier, the culmination of a decade of research, represents a major advance in this regard. In a wide- ranging study, Brophy carefully reconstructs the interplay of local elites, intellectuals, community, and state from which the contemporary Uyghur nation emerged: a Uyghur- centered view of modern Uyghur history.2 On the basis of extensive archival, published, and manuscript sources, Brophy has written the fullest and most convincing account to date of the twentieth-century development of the Uyghur national concept. Synthesizing intellectual and political history, he puts persuasively to rest the frequent assertion that modern Uyghur identity was imposed from above by Soviet bureaucrats and passively adopted by its designated subjects. Brophy demonstrates that the Uyghur national idea, and the bureaucratic reification of that idea, emerged from complex negotiations between proto-Uyghur elites and intellectuals, ethnographers of various backgrounds, and Soviet officials on the local and national level.
  • Without Land, There Is No Life: Chinese State Suppression of Uyghur Environmental Activism

    Without Land, There Is No Life: Chinese State Suppression of Uyghur Environmental Activism

    Without land, there is no life: Chinese state suppression of Uyghur environmental activism Table of Contents Summary ..............................................................................................................................2 Cultural Significance of the Environment and Environmentalism ......................................5 Nuclear Testing: Suppression of Uyghur Activism ...........................................................15 Pollution and Ecological Destruction in East Turkestan ...................................................30 Lack of Participation in Decision Making: Development and Displacement ....................45 Legal Instruments...............................................................................................................61 Recommendations ..............................................................................................................66 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................69 Endnotes .............................................................................................................................70 Cover image: Dead toghrak (populus nigra) tree in Niya. Photo courtesy of Flickr 1 Summary The intimate connection between the Uyghur people and the land of East Turkestan is celebrated in songs and poetry written and performed in the Uyghur language. Proverbs in Uyghur convey how the Uyghur culture is tied to reverence of the land and that an individual’s identity is inseparable
  • From the Editorial Board

    From the Editorial Board

    https://doi.org/10.7592/FEJF2019.76.kazakh FROM THE EDITORIAL BOARD KAZAKH DIASPORA IN KYRGYZSTAN: HISTORY OF SETTLEMENT AND ETHNOGRAPHIC PECULIARITIES Bibiziya Kalshabayeva Professor, Department of History, Archeology and Ethnology Al-Farabi Kazakh National University Almaty, Kazakhstan Email: [email protected] Gulnara Dadabayeva Associate Professor, KIMEP University Almaty, Kazakhstan Email: [email protected] Dauren Eskekbaev Associate Professor, Almaty University of Management Almaty, Kazakhstan Email: [email protected] Abstract: The article focuses on the most significant stages of the formation of the Kazakh diaspora in the Kyrgyz Republic, to point out what reasons contributed to the rugged Kazakh migration process in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries and how it affected the forms and types of their settlements (compact or disperse). The researched issues also include the identification of factors provoked by humans and the state to launch these migrations. Surprisingly enough, opposite to the claims made by independent Kazakhstan leadership in the early 2000s, the number of Kazakhs in Kyrgyzstan wishing to become repatriates to their native country is still far from the desired. Thus the article is an attempt to find out what reasons and factors influence the Kazakh residents’ desire to stay in the neighboring country as a minority. To provide the answer, the authors analyzed the dynamics of statistical variations in the number of migrants and the reasons of these changes. The other key point in tracing what characteristic features separate Kazakhs in Kyrgyzstan and their kinsmen in Kazakhstan is the archival data, statistical, historical, and field sources, which provide a systematic overview of the largely unstudied pages of the history of the Kazakh diaspora.
  • Written Evidence Submitted by East Turkistan Government in Exile (XIN0078)

    Written Evidence Submitted by East Turkistan Government in Exile (XIN0078)

    Written evidence submitted by East Turkistan Government in Exile (XIN0078) The East Turkistan Problem and How the UK Should Address it East Turkistan Government in Exile The East Turkistan Government in Exile (ETGE) is the democratically elected official body representing East Turkistan and its people. On September 14, 2004, the government in exile was established in Washington, DC by a coalition of Uyghur and other East Turkistani organizations. The East Turkistan Government in Exile is a democratic body with a representative Parliament. The primary leaders — President, Vice President, Prime Minister, Speaker (Chair) of Parliament, and Deputy Speaker (Chair) of Parliament — are democratically elected by the Parliament members from all over the East Turkistani diaspora in the General Assembly which takes place every four years. The East Turkistan Government in Exile is submitting this evidence and recommendation to the UK Parliament and the UK Government as it is the leading body representing the interests of not only Uyghurs but all peoples of East Turkistan including Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, Uzbeks, and Tatars. More importantly, the ETGE has submitted the first ever legal complaint to the International Criminal Court against China and its officials for genocide and other crimes against humanity. We would like the UK Government to assist our community using all available means to seek justice and end to decades of prolonged colonization, genocide, and occupation in East Turkistan. Brief History of East Turkistan and the Uyghurs With a history of over 6000 years, according to Uyghur historians like Turghun Almas, the Uyghurs are the natives of East Turkistan. Throughout the millennia, the Uyghurs and other Turkic peoples have established and maintained numerous independent kingdoms, states, and even empires.
  • China's De-Extremization of Uyghurs in Xinjiang

    China's De-Extremization of Uyghurs in Xinjiang

    PATRIK MEYER CHINA’S DE-EXTREMIZATION OF UYGHURS IN XINJIANG JUNE 2016 About the Author About New America Patrik Meyer is a fellow with New New America is committed to renewing American politics, America’s International Security program. prosperity, and purpose in the Digital Age. We generate big He has eclectic personal, academic, and ideas, bridge the gap between technology and policy, and professional backgrounds, which inform curate broad public conversation. We combine the best of his multidisciplinary research and narrow a policy research institute, technology laboratory, public the gap between theory and practice in his work. He forum, media platform, and a venture capital fund for earned his PhD in politics and international studies from ideas. We are a distinctive community of thinkers, writers, the University of Cambridge, working with Chinese researchers, technologists, and community activists who scholars to provide better understanding of the conflicts believe deeply in the possibility of American renewal. in Xinjiang, China, that fuel tensions between the Uyghurs and the Chinese government. He also holds an M.P.A. in Find out more at newamerica.org/our-story. development from Harvard Kennedy School, an M.S. in structural dynamics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and a B.S. in civil engineering from the About the International Security Program University of California, Berkeley. New America’s International Security program aims to Before commencing his academic studies, Patrik provide evidence-based analysis of some of the thorniest spent twenty years traveling the world, mainly through questions facing American policymakers and the public. the Middle East, North Africa, and Asia, where he was The program is largely focused on South Asia and the deeply involved in Islamic and Chinese studies.
  • The Kyrgyzstan-Uzbekistan Border: a Legacy of Soviet Imperialism

    The Kyrgyzstan-Uzbekistan Border: a Legacy of Soviet Imperialism

    Undergraduate Journal of Global Citizenship Volume 4 Issue 1 Article 4 6-1-2021 The Kyrgyzstan-Uzbekistan Border: A Legacy of Soviet Imperialism Liam Abbate Santa Clara University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/jogc Recommended Citation Abbate, Liam (2021) "The Kyrgyzstan-Uzbekistan Border: A Legacy of Soviet Imperialism," Undergraduate Journal of Global Citizenship: Vol. 4 : Iss. 1 , Article 4. Available at: https://digitalcommons.fairfield.edu/jogc/vol4/iss1/4 This item has been accepted for inclusion in DigitalCommons@Fairfield by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@Fairfield. It is brought to you by DigitalCommons@Fairfield with permission from the rights- holder(s) and is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses, you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Abbate: The Kyrgyzstan-Uzbekistan Border: A Legacy of Soviet Imperialism dispute, particularly in relation to the U.S.- The Kyrgyzstan- China rivalry. Uzbekistan Border: Background A Legacy of Soviet Kyrgyzstan is among the poorest of the nations of Central Asia: its per capita is a Imperialism mere tenth of its larger neighbor LIAM ABBATE Kazakhstan.1 Formerly a constituent republic of the Union of the Soviet Socialist Republics, the Kirghiz Soviet Socialist Republic declared independence as Abstract Kyrgyzstan on August 31, 1991.
  • Comprehensive Encirclement

    Comprehensive Encirclement

    COMPREHENSIVE ENCIRCLEMENT: THE CHINESE COMMUNIST PARTY’S STRATEGY IN XINJIANG GARTH FALLON A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Philosophy School of Humanities and Social Sciences International and Political Studies July 2018 1 THE UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES Thesis/Dissertation Sheet Surname or Family name: FALLON First name: Garth Other name/s: Nil Abbreviation for degree as given in the University calendar: MPhil School: Humanitiesand Social Sciences Faculty: UNSW Canberraat ADFA Title: Comprehensive encirclement: the Chinese Communist Party's strategy in Xinjiang Abstract 350 words maximum: (PLEASETYPE) This thesis argues that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has a strategy for securing Xinjiang - its far-flung predominantly Muslim most north-western province - through a planned program of Sinicisation. Securing Xinjiang would turna weakly defended 'back door' to China into a strategic strongpointfrom which Beijing canproject influence into Central Asia. The CCP's strategy is to comprehensively encircle Xinjiang with Han people and institutions, a Han­ dominated economy, and supporting infrastructure emanatingfrom inner China A successful program of Sinicisation would transform Xinjiang from a Turkic-language-speaking, largely Muslim, physically remote, economically under-developed region- one that is vulnerable to separation from the PRC - into one that will be substantially more culturally similar to, and physically connected with, the traditional Han-dominated heartland of inner China. Once achieved, complete Sinicisation would mean Xinjiang would be extremely difficult to separate from China. In Xinjiang, the CCP enacts policies in support of Sinication across all areas of statecraft. This thesis categorises these activities across three dimensions: the economic and demographic dimension, the political and cultural dimension, and the security and international cooperationdimension.
  • The Politics of Language in Kyrgyzstan

    The Politics of Language in Kyrgyzstan

    TITLE : THE POLITICS OF LANGUAGE IN KYRGYZSTAN AUTHOR : EUGENE HUSKEY, Stetson University THE NATIONAL COUNCI L FOR SOVIET AND EAST EUROPEAN RESEARC H TITLE VIII PROGRA M 1755 Massachusetts Avenue, N .W . Washington, D .C . 20036 PROJECT INFORMATION : 1 CONTRACTOR : Stetson University PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR : Eugene Huske y COUNCIL CONTRACT NUMBER : 810-28 DATE : August 1, 199 5 COPYRIGHT INFORMATION Individual researchers retain the copyright on work products derived from research funded b y Council Contract. The Council and the U .S. Government have the right to duplicate written report s and other materials submitted under Council Contract and to distribute such copies within th e Council and U.S. Government for their own use, and to draw upon such reports and materials fo r their own studies; but the Council and U.S. Government do not have the right to distribute, o r make such reports and materials available, outside the Council or U.S. Government without th e written consent of the authors, except as may be required under the provisions of the Freedom o f Information Act 5 U .S.C. 552, or other applicable law . 1 The work leading to this report was supported in part by contract funds provided by the Nationa l Council for Soviet and East European Research, made available by the U . S. Department of State under Title VIII (the Soviet-Eastern European Research and Training Act of 1983, as amended) . The analysis and interpretations contained in the report are those of the author(s) . THE POLITICS OF LANGUAGE IN KYRGYZSTAN' Eugene Huske y Official policy toward language is one of the most divisive issues in new states .
  • The Xinjiang Problem

    The Xinjiang Problem

    THE XINJIANG PROBLEM Graham E. Fuller S. Frederick Starr © Central Asia-Caucasus Institute Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies The Johns Hopkins University Tel.: 1 202 663 7723 [email protected] The Xinjiang Problem 3 Table of Contents Introduction: The Xinjiang Project............................................. 1 I. What is the Problem in Xinjiang? ...........................................4 II. The Geopolitical Realities: a Primer......................................10 III. What Do The Key Players Want? .......................................16 Uyghur Grievances.................................................................................. 16 Uyghur Goals and Actions ........................................................................22 China’s Grievances..................................................................................26 China’s Goals and Actions ........................................................................30 IV. What Is At Stake? Why The Xinjiang Problem Matters ........33 Implications for Ethnic Minorities.............................................................. 33 Uyghurs and the Muslim World.................................................................34 Terrorism .............................................................................................. 40 China and Regional Geopolitics..................................................................43 Human Rights Issues................................................................................47 Economic