Assessment of Impact of Different Implementation Schemes for the Proposed Sandwip-Urir Char-Noakhali Cross-Dam on Regional Hydro Morphological Regime
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ASSESSMENT OF IMPACT OF DIFFERENT IMPLEMENTATION SCHEMES FOR THE PROPOSED SANDWIP-URIR CHAR-NOAKHALI CROSS-DAM ON REGIONAL HYDRO MORPHOLOGICAL REGIME MD. MONOWAR-UL HAQ INSTITUTE OF WATER AND FLOOD MANAGEMENT BANGLADESH UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MARCH 2019 ASSESSMENT OF IMPACT OF DIFFERENT IMPLEMENTATION SCHEMES FOR THE PROPOSED SANDWIP-URIR CHAR-NOAKHALI CROSS-DAM ON REGIONAL HYDRO MORPHOLOGICAL REGIME A Thesis Submitted By MD. MONOWAR-UL HAQ In partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE OF WATER AND FLOOD MANAGEMENT BANGLADESH UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY MARCH 2019 Dedicated to My Beloved Family iii TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .......................................................................................................... iv LIST OF FIGURES ................................................................................................................. vii LIST OF TABLES ..................................................................................................................... x LIST OF NOTATIONS ............................................................................................................ xi LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................. xii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ..................................................................................................... xiii ABSTRACT ............................................................................................................................ xiv CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 1 1.1 Study Background ....................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Objectives .................................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Scope of the Study....................................................................................................... 3 1.4 Outline of Thesis ......................................................................................................... 4 CHAPTER 2 LITERATURE REVIEW .................................................................................... 5 2.1 Flow and Sediment Dynamics..................................................................................... 5 2.2 Residual Flow .............................................................................................................. 6 2.3 Tidal Asymmetry......................................................................................................... 7 2.4 Historical Development of the Meghna Estuary ......................................................... 8 2.5 Sediment Morphology in the Meghna Estuary ......................................................... 13 2.6 Sediment Influx in the Meghna Estuary .................................................................... 13 2.7 Sediment Dynamics in the Meghna Estuary ............................................................. 16 2.8 Land Reclamation in the Meghna Estuary ................................................................ 19 2.9 Proposed Sandwip-Urir Char-Noakhali Cross-dam .................................................. 23 2.10 Summarization .......................................................................................................... 26 CHAPTER 3 METHODOLOGY ............................................................................................ 28 3.1 Study Approach ......................................................................................................... 28 iv 3.2 Hydrodynamic Modeling Exercise............................................................................ 28 3.3 Model Description ..................................................................................................... 31 3.4 Model Domain........................................................................................................... 32 3.5 Bathymetry Data ....................................................................................................... 33 3.6 Boundary Conditions................................................................................................. 35 3.7 Asymmetry Measurements ........................................................................................ 36 3.7.1 Wave Asymmetry Properties ............................................................................. 37 3.7.2 Flood/ Ebb Dominance ...................................................................................... 38 3.7.3 Slack Water Durations ....................................................................................... 39 3.8 Tidal Asymmetry in Dam Locations ......................................................................... 39 CHAPTER 4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ........................................................................ 42 4.1 Model Calibration and Validation ............................................................................. 42 4.2 Simulation Cases ....................................................................................................... 46 4.3 Flow Regime ............................................................................................................. 49 4.4 Residual Flow Patterns .............................................................................................. 58 4.5 Wave Asymmetry ...................................................................................................... 61 4.5.1 Asymmetry 1 ...................................................................................................... 63 4.5.2 Asymmetry 2 ...................................................................................................... 63 4.6 Flood/ Ebb Dominance.............................................................................................. 65 4.6.1 Vertical (WL) Dominance ................................................................................. 67 4.6.2 Horizontal (Velocity) Dominance...................................................................... 67 4.7 Slack Water Duration ................................................................................................ 69 4.7.1 Slack Before Flood (SBF) .................................................................................. 71 4.7.2 Slack Before Ebb (SBE) .................................................................................... 71 4.8 Sediment Dynamics................................................................................................... 72 4.9 Discussion ................................................................................................................. 85 CHAPTER 5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ............................................ 88 v 5.1 Conclusions ............................................................................................................... 88 5.2 Recommendations for Future Studies ....................................................................... 90 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................ 92 vi LIST OF FIGURES Figure 2.1. Temporal development of the Meghna Estuary (Sarker et al., 2011). .................... 9 Figure 2.2. Map indicative of land gains within Noakhali Region. Left map is based on Rennel’s survey and right map is based on survey done during LRP (Barua, 1997). ............. 12 Figure 2.3. Historical imagery showing land gains in the Meghna Estuary. ........................... 12 Figure 2.4. Trend lines of sediment flux along the Ganges and Brahmaputra during different time periods using secondary data, BWDB and FAP data (Rahman et al., 2018). ................. 16 Figure 2.5. Direction and relative importance of river and tidal flows in influencing sediment discharge (Sarker et al., 2011; based on Sokolewicz, & Louters, 2007). ................................ 19 Figure 2.6. Placement and land gains in the upper estuarine regions due to these historical cross-dams (source: BWDB). ................................................................................................... 22 Figure 2.7. Map of the Meghna Estuary from the MES (MoWR, 2001). ................................ 23 Figure 3.2. Bathymetry of the model computation domain. .................................................... 34 Figure 3.3. Bathymetry modifications to incorporate cross-dams into the model domain. ..... 35 Figure 3.4. Average monthly variation of water and suspended sediment discharge of the combined Ganges–Brahmaputra–Meghna River system (Islam et al., 2002). ........................ 36 Figure 3.5. Schematic diagram of tidal water level profile illustrating the definitions of wave asymmetry (Hussain et al., 2013). ........................................................................................... 38 Figure 3.6. Schematic diagram of tidal velocity profile illustrating the definitions of tide dominance asymmetry and asymmetry due to slack water durations (Hussain and Tajima, 2019). ....................................................................................................................................... 39 Figure 3.7. Plot of measured water level, velocity and turbidity along the northern channel of Urir Char Island (Hussain