DOCSLIB.ORG

Appointments, Promotion, and Tenure Criteria and Procedures for the Ohio State University College of Optometry

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Appointments, Promotion, and Tenure Criteria and Procedures for the Ohio State University College of Optometry Appointments, Promotion, and Tenure Criteria and Procedures for The Ohio State University College of Optometry Last accepted by the Faculty Advisory Committee: 3/6/17 Approved by the Office of Academic Affairs: 7/10/2017 Table of Contents I. Preamble .............................................................................................................................................................................. 3 II. College Mission ................................................................................................................................................................... 3 III. Definitions .......................................................................................................................................................................... 3 A. Committee of the Eligible Faculty ............................................................................................................................... 3 1. Tenure-Track Faculty ................................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Clinical Faculty ............................................................................................................................................................. 4 3. Research Faculty ......................................................................................................................................................... 4 4. Associated Faculty ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 5. Courtesy Faculty .......................................................................................................................................................... 4 6. Conflict of Interest………………………………………………………………………………….…………………………………….………………………4 7. Minimum Composition ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….……………………….4 B. Promotion and Tenure Committee …………………………………………………………………………………………………….…………………… 4 C. Quorum ........................................................................................................................................................................... 4 D. Recommendations from the Committee of the Eligible Faculty .................................................................................... 5 1. Appointment ............................................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Reappointment, Promotion and Tenure, Promotion, and Contract Renewal ............................................................ 5 IV. Appointments .................................................................................................................................................................... 5 A. Criteria ............................................................................................................................................................................ 5 1. Tenure-track Faculty ................................................................................................................................................... 5 2. Clinical Faculty ............................................................................................................................................................. 6 3. Research Faculty ......................................................................................................................................................... 6 4. Associated Faculty ....................................................................................................................................................... 7 5. Courtesy Appointments .............................................................................................................................................. 8 B. Procedures ...................................................................................................................................................................... 8 1. Tenure-track Faculty ................................................................................................................................................... 8 2. Clinical Faculty ............................................................................................................................................................. 9 3. Research Faculty ....................................................................................................................................................... 10 4. Transfer from the Tenure-track ................................................................................................................................ 11 5. Associated Faculty ..................................................................................................................................................... 11 6. Courtesy Appointments for Faculty .......................................................................................................................... 12 V. Annual Review Procedures ............................................................................................................................................... 12 A. Probationary Tenure-track Faculty ............................................................................................................................... 12 1. Fourth-year review .................................................................................................................................................... 13 2. Exclusion of time from probationary period ............................................................................................................. 13 B. Tenured Faculty ............................................................................................................................................................ 13 C. Clinical Faculty .............................................................................................................................................................. 14 D. Research Faculty .......................................................................................................................................................... 14 E. Associated Faculty ......................................................................................................................................................... 15 VI. Merit Salary Increases and Other Rewards ..................................................................................................................... 15 A. Criteria .......................................................................................................................................................................... 15 B. Procedures .................................................................................................................................................................... 16 C. Documentation ............................................................................................................................................................. 17 VII. Promotion and Tenure and Promotion Reviews ............................................................................................................ 17 A. Criteria .......................................................................................................................................................................... 17 1. Promotion to Associate Professor with Tenure ........................................................................................................ 18 2. Promotion to Professor ............................................................................................................................................. 19 3. Promotion of Clinical Faculty .................................................................................................................................... 19 4. Promotion of Research Faculty ................................................................................................................................. 20 5. Promotion of Associated Faculty .............................................................................................................................. 21 B. Procedures .................................................................................................................................................................... 21 1. Candidate Responsibilities ……………………………………………………………………………….…………….…………...…………………….21 2. Promotion and Tenure Committee Responsibilities ……………………………………….…………………………………………………..22 Page 1 3. Eligible Faculty Responsibilities ……………………………………………………………….……………...…………….…………………………..23 4. Dean Responsibilities …………….……………………………………………………………….…………………………………………………...…….24 5. External Evaluations .................................................................................................................................................. 21 C. Documentation ............................................................................................................................................................. 25 1. Teaching .................................................................................................................................................................... 25 2. Scholarship ...............................................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PEILING CHEN EDUCATION Doctorate of Optometry May 2018
    PEILING CHEN EDUCATION Doctorate of Optometry May 2018 Salus University, Pennsylvania College of Optometry, Elkins Park, PA ​ Bachelors of Science in Biology May 2013 College of Chemical and Life Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD ​ EMPLOYMENT Assistant Faculty of Ophthalmology January 2019- present Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins Medicine ◾ Provide comprehensive eye services specializing in the diagnosis and management of ocular diseases, conditions and post-operative surgical care in areas such as: dry eye, ocular allergy, macular degeneration, retinal pathologies, diabetic retinopathy, hypertensive retinopathy, glaucoma, LASIK care, and cataracts; as well as, eye examinations and contact lens fittings Optometrist August 2018- December 2018 National Vision, Inc. ◾ Provide comprehensive eye exams, contact lense fittings and assistance in the referral and management of glaucoma, diabetes and cataract patients ◾ Treat minor ocular service conditions like blepharitis, ocular allergy and dry eye Optical Principles and Ophthalmic Application Teaching Assistant August 2015-May 2016 Pennsylvania College of Optometry, Elkins Park, PA ◾ Assisted first year optometry students at the Pennsylvania College of Optometry with challenging course topics ◾ Mentored underclassmen on how to succeed in the course based on prior experience Vision Therapist September 2011-2014 Appelbaum Eye Care Associates, Bethesda, MD ◾ Provided assistance on vision therapy exercises to patients with binocular vision and ocular motor dysfunctions ◾ Performed
    [Show full text]
  • AAAA Statement on Clinical Doctorate Degrees
    AAAA Statement on Clinical Doctorate Degrees The American Academy of Anesthesiologist Assistants is dedicated to maintaining the standards of the profession and the specialty by remaining current with the ongoing changes and emerging needs in health care delivery while promoting the safety and upholding the rights of all patients undergoing medical treatment involving an anesthesia provider. A recent proliferation of entry-level clinical doctorate degrees into the educational models of non-physician providers has caused a commensurate increase in the use of the title “doctor” in the healthcare system. Inappropriately, the title "resident" and "doctor" has been used in the clinical setting by students and graduates of these programs despite their non-physician status. This trend is a recognized source of potential confusion for patients concerning their medical care and has potential negative implications with respect to scope of practice infringement and conflict of interest, decreased professional diversity, increased health care costs, and aggravation of provider shortages. The AAAA believes that the practice of medicine remains the domain of physicians and that the entry-level doctorate degree for the practice of medicine is the MD/DO. Physicians are integral members and leaders of the health care team. In the interest of patient safety, Anesthesiologist Assistants practice exclusively in, promote, and are dedicated to the Anesthesia Care Team as defined by the AAAA and ASA. The AAAA is committed to instilling confidence in the public by encouraging practitioners to adhere to established ethical norms and regional legal constraints. Furthermore, we believe in optimizing the use of all provider resources to deliver health care to everyone.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for Promotion of Full Time Non-Regular
    UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI – KANSAS CITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE GUIDELINES FOR PROMOTION OF FULL TIME NON-REGULAR (NON-TENURE) PHYSICIAN FACULTY1 1 Non-Regular faculty refers to faculty who have non-tenure appointments. INTRODUCTION The University of Missouri – Kansas City (UMKC) School of Medicine (SOM) seeks faculty members who are creative scholars and inspired teachers dedicated to the pursuit of knowledge and its transmission to others. The excellence and reputation of the University depends upon the scholarly productivity and dedication of the faculty. These guidelines are intended to provide a mechanism to recognize (appoint or promote) full-time non-regular physician faculty members1 who share these objectives with faculty rank commensurate with their contributions. Further, these guidelines are designed to address the changing environment of the medical school faculty and to emphasize that scholarly activity related to the practice of medicine is the major responsibility of the UMKC SOM. To achieve this goal and to meet the specific objectives listed below, a broader definition of scholarly activity is employed. Although traditional scholarship (published research) remains an important element, excellence in teaching, an active commitment to institutional and public service and acumen of clinical practice are equally recognized for their scholarly merit and importance in the process of faculty promotion. Revised January 2013 2 PROMOTION REVIEW PROCESS2 1. A nomination for faculty promotion is initiated by a Department Chair or the Department’s or Hospital Promotion Committee, if one is present. Faculty members seeking promotion at a facility outside the departmental institution should submit their requests and required credentials to that institution’s Associate Dean.
    [Show full text]
  • The Business Professional Doctorate As an Informing Channel: a Survey and Analysis
    International Journal of Doctoral Studies Volume 4, 2009 The Business Professional Doctorate as an Informing Channel: A Survey and Analysis T. Grandon Gill Uwe Hoppe University of South Florida University of Osnabrueck Tampa, FL, USA Osnabrueck, Germany [email protected] [email protected] Abstract Although growing in popularity in other countries, the business professional doctorate has yet to gain traction in the U.S. Such programs, intended to offer advanced disciplinary and research training to individuals who later plan to apply that training to employment in industry, are fre- quently seen to be inferior to their academically-focused Ph.D. program counterparts. Further- more, if the sole purpose of a doctorate is to develop individuals focused on producing scholarly research articles, that assessment may well be correct. We argue, however, that such a narrowly focused view of the purpose of doctoral programs is self-defeating; by exclusively focusing on scholarly research and writings, we virtually guarantee that our research will never make it into practice. The paper begins by identifying a variety of types of doctoral programs that exist glob- ally and placing these in a conceptual framework. We then present a detailed case study of the information systems (IS) doctoral programs offered in Osnabrueck, Germany—where as many as 90% of candidates choose careers in industry in preference to academia. Finally, we propose— supported using both conceptual arguments drawn from the study of complex informing and ob- served examples—that the greatest benefit of business professional doctorates may be the crea- tion of enduring informing channels between practice and industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Survey on Master Degrees and Joint Degrees in Europe
    EUA thema European University Association Association Européenne de l’Université Survey on Master Degrees and Joint Degrees in Europe September 2002 by Christian Tauch and Andrejs Rauhvargers Survey on Master Degrees and Joint Degrees in Europe September 2002 by Christian Tauch and Andrejs Rauhvargers This survey is undertaken with the financial support of the European Commission, through the SOCRATES Programme. 3 3 5 FOREWORD 6METHODOLOGY 7PART 1 — MASTER DEGREES IN THE EUROPEAN HIGHER EDUCATION AREA by Christian Tauch 7•Executive summary 8•Types of degrees at Master level The Anglo-Saxon tradition The Nordic countries: deepening the reform The Baltic countries: well advanced in the reform process Western and Southern Europe: Bologna boosts reforms Central and Eastern Europe: the reform continues 19 • “Academic“ versus “professional“ orientation 20 • “Old“ versus “new“ Masters 21 • Access to Master programmes 22 • Credit systems, Diploma Supplement and accreditation 24 • Main references 27 PART 2 — JOINT DEGREE STUDY by Andrejs Rauhvargers 27 • Executive summary 28 • High expectations 29 • Results of the study Definition of joint degrees Scale of cooperation 30 • Joint degrees: a new trend Joint degrees and fields of study Joint degrees at Master and doctoral levels Joint degrees and national qualifications Credit systems in joint degrees Language of tuition National legislations Recognition 41 • Priority issues 42 • Observations and conclusions 43 • Recommendations 5 FOREWORD Questions related to the duration and archi- degree programmes and joint degrees tecture of Master level degrees across Europe offered across Europe. The results show that as well as to the development of joint degrees in these two important, and often interrelated offered in partnership by institutions from dif- areas, further reflection and action are ferent countries are particularly high on the needed to clarify and define both the archi- European higher education political agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Uaa Policies and Procedures Relating to Appointment, Review, Promotion
    CHAPTER III: UAA POLICIES AND PROCEDURES RELATING TO APPOINTMENT, REVIEW, PROMOTION, AND TENURE Page 1 Page 2 POLICIES AND PROCEDURES RELATING TO APPOINTMENT, REVIEW, PROMOTION AND TENURE Approved by Board of Regents, December 15, 1988 The following University of Alaska Anchorage policies and procedures regarding faculty appointment, review, promotion, and tenure are to be used in conjunction with the Regents’ Policies relating to appointment, review, promotion, tenure, and sabbatical leave. If there appears to be a conflict between the policies, the Regents’ Policies will prevail. Unless otherwise explicitly stated, the following assumptions and principles shall guide the application of these UAA policies and procedures. A. The University of Alaska Anchorage has a policy as long as he/she continues to hold a tripartite responsibility for teaching, faculty appointment unless it is changed by research/creative activity, and service. mutual agreement between the faculty Individual schools and colleges have, as a member and the appropriate dean or director. minimum, a bipartite responsibility, E. Calculating "time in rank" for years of including teaching and service, but may, service of a former community college depending on their mission, assume a faculty member shall be as follows: total tripartite responsibility. Creative activity years in lanes A and B shall count for time in refers to such things as producing original rank as instructor; total years in lane C shall works or performances in art, literature, and count for time in rank as assistant professor; the performing arts. Research refers to the total years in lanes D and E shall count for acquisition of knowledge, information, or time in rank as associate professor.
    [Show full text]
  • Modernizing the Scope of Practice of Optometry Will Improve Access to Needed Eye and Vision Health Care for All Maryland Citizens
    P.O. Box 350, Stevenson, MD 21153 ! T: (410) 486-9662 ! F: (443) 378-8845 ! www.marylandoptometry.org Modernizing the scope of practice of optometry will improve access to needed eye and vision health care for all Maryland citizens. It will ensure patients receive the best quality of care available, improve overall patient health outcomes and lower health care costs for both patients and insurers alike. SUMMARY OF SCOPE EXPANSION OBJECTIVES By removing outdated prohibitions in current statute, the bill seeks to better serve optometric patients by allowing Maryland optometrists to: • Prescribe all FDA Approved Therapeutic and Diagnostic Agents (e.g., oral and topical drugs, vitamins, and other therapies) • Independently Treat Glaucoma (development of patient treatment plan & delivery of pre/post operative care) • Perform In-office Diagnostic Testing (e.g., genetic testing via cheek swab and blood glucose testing for diabetes) • Order Diagnostic Tests (e.g., blood work, MRI, x-ray, sonogram, other lab work related to diseases of the eye and ocular system) • Remove Foreign Bodies “STATE OF THE STATE” SCOPE OF PRACTICE FACTS • Doctors of optometry order diagnostic tests in 45 states • Doctors of optometry prescribe controlled substances in 44 • Doctors of optometry to use oral drugs to treat Glaucoma in 42 states • Doctors of optometry prescribe anti-fungal oral medications in 41 states EDUCATION & TRAINING Optometrists receive a minimum of eight 8 years of education and training to obtain the required undergraduate and doctorate degrees necessary to practice optometry. All optometrists are required to pass a three part comprehensive national exam administered by the National Board of Examiners in Optometry prior to receiving their doctorate degree.
    [Show full text]
  • Optometry Career Guide
    Optometry A Career Guide Acknowledgments This career guide was written and compiled by the Association of Schools and Colleges of Optometry (ASCO). The guide was written to provide a “core document” that could represent the most current, consistent, and reliable information on optometry as a career for use by prospective students, prehealth advisors, and optometrists who want to share infor- mation about their profession with others. The material is intended for use by ASCO and its member schools and colleges in any format that will make information about optometry accessible and available to those who express interest in the profession. Director, Student and Residency Affairs Association of Schools and Colleges of Optometry 6110 Executive Boulevard, Suite 420 Rockville, MD 20852 optometriceducation.org Updated August 2020 Table of Contents I. DEFINITION OF THE PROFESSION ...................................................................1 II. OUTLOOK FOR THE PROFESSION ..................................................................2 Population Changes and the Optometry Profession ...........................................2 Social and Legal Changes Affecting Optometry ..................................................3 Professional Satisfaction .............................................................................................4 III. NEW FRONTIERS IN EYE CARE ........................................................................5 Lasers .............................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Optometry (OD)
    Optometry (OD) • Doctors of optometry examine, diagnose, treat and manage diseases and disorders of the visual system and eye. They may be the first to recognize systemic diseases in their patients such as diabetes or high blood pressure. • Besides routine eye exams and fitting patients for corrective lenses, optometrists treat many other eye problems including glaucoma and visual skill problems such as the inability to move, fixate and focus the eye. • Although the majority of optometrists practice primary care optometry, some specialize in particular populations or treatments including pediatrics, low vision rehabilitation, sports vision, learning disabilities, and head trauma. • Optometrists also encourage preventive measures such as monitoring children’s vision, evaluating school vision, and promoting nutrition and hygiene education. • Optometrists collaborate with ophthalmologists, physicians (MDs or DOs) who perform eye surgery, as well as diagnose and treat eye diseases and injuries. Education & Licensure • Generally schools require at least two or more years of undergraduate work (90 credit hours). The preference, however, is for students with a bachelor’s degree. • Optometry school is a four year program. The first two years are largely classroom-based and the third and fourth year are spent mostly in clinical settings. After successful completion of the 4 years, students graduate with an O.D. (Doctor of Optometry). • A licensure exam is required. Preparation • Optometry programs look for well-rounded students who are strong in science and have good communication skills. Programs consider GPA as well as the score on the aptitude test, the Optometry Admissions Test (OAT). • They also look for empathy, leadership skills, extracurricular and community activities, and observation experiences in optometric facilities.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Researchers – Biographies
    Clinical Researchers – Biographies Benjamin Backus, PhD Dr. Benjamin Backus is currently a Research Staff Member at SUNY College of Optometry specializing in visual neuroscience. He has served as a Principal Investigator on many studies and mentored a number of Masters, PhD and post doctorate students. He has been Chair of the Graduate Program Committee at the Graduate Center for Vision Research since 2008. Dr. Backus received his PhD from UC Berkeley and continued his post‐doctoral research at Stanford University. He recently co‐developed an NIH funded clinical trial titled Light Deprivation Utilized to Mitigate Amblyopia (LUMA), which tested the effects of binocular visual deprivation as a pre‐ treatment to enhance perceptual learning during treatment of adults with amblyopia. Alexandra Benavente‐Perez, MCOptom, MS, PhD Dr. Alexandra Benavente‐Perez is currently an Associate Clinical Professor at SUNY College of Optometry as well as a Research Staff Member where serves as a Principal investigator on clinical trials and has mentored over a dozen undergraduate, OD and Master students. She specializes in visually guided eye growth and myopia development/control. Dr. Benavente‐Perez received her Doctor of Optometry from the University of Valladolid in Spain, Masters in Investigative Ophthalmology & Vision Sciences from UMIST in Manchester, UK and her PhD in Vision Sciences from Aston University in Birmingham, UK. She completed her post‐doctoral research training at City University in London and at SUNY College of Optometry. She is a Fellow of the American Academy of Optometry and a member of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO). Kenneth Ciuffreda, OD, PhD Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Study of Kenyan Optometrists View on Future of Optometry And
    International Journal of Ophthalmology & Vision Research Research Article Study of Kenyan Optometrists View on Future of Optometry and Prospective Impact on Public Health - Shadrack Muma1* and Stephen Obonyo2 1Department of Public Health, Maseno University, Kenya 2Department of Computing and Informatics, Strathmore University, Kenya *Address for Correspondence: Shadrack Muma, Department of Public Health, Maseno University, Kenya; E-mail: [email protected] ORCID ID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0598-1632 Submitted: 04 January 2021; Approved: 20 January 2021; Published: 22 January 2021 Cite this article: Muma S, Obonyo S. Study of Kenyan Optometrists View on Future of Optometry and Prospective Impact on Public Health. Int J Ophthal Vision Res. 2021 Jan 22;5(1): 001-006. Copyright: © 2021 Muma S, et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. ISSN: 2640-5660 International Journal of Ophthalmology & Vision Research ISSN: 2640-5660 ABSTRACT Background: VISION 2020: The Right to Sight, was to ensure that by the year 2020, a great reduction in the incidences of avoidable blindness be recorded. This was achievable by training optometrists. Kenya has a population of 47 million, with 56 registered optometrists who are not regulated by the government. However there is no data on optometrists view on the future of optometry in Kenya and the public health implication. Methods: A semi-structured questionnaire was emailed to 56 registered optometrists. The questionnaire contained broad areas such as demographics of participants, their view on status of optometry in kenya, challenges faced by the optometrists, availability of lecturers, their concerns on the way forward and how these issues impacts on public health.
    [Show full text]
  • ABCMO Overview and History
    ABCMO - Overview of ABCMO and History of Board Certification Table of Contents: • ABCMO Mission Statement • Requirements for Certification in Medical Optometry • Development of Specialization and Board Certification • General Practice Doesn’t Require Specialization and Board Certification • Specialization and Board Certification are Linked • ABCMO Offers Traditional Board Certification • Specialization and Board Certification in Medicine • Defined-License Practitioners do not Need Board Certification • Development of Optometry Residencies and Specialization • VA Develops First Residency Training and Specialization • VA Develops First Residency Matching Program • VA Develops Hospital-Based Student and Residency Training • Development of ACMO by NAVAO and NBEO • Creation of ABCMO Certification in Medical Optometry • Thirty-five Years Required to Achieve Board Certification in Medical Optometry • Why ABCMO is Creditable • Summary ABCMO Mission Statement: The American Board of Certification in Medical Optometry (ABMO) was established in 2009 to recognize and certify optometrists with advanced competence in medical optometry resulting from completion of an accredited residency in the treatment and management of ocular disease. Eligibility for ABCMO requires passage of the examination “Advanced Competence in Medical Optometry” administered by the National Board of Examiners in Optometry and evidence of sound clinical and ethical judgment and active practice in the specialty since completion of training. The ABCMO is a non-profit 501(c)3 organization created to provide practitioners, medical facilities, government and state agencies and the general public a uniform national standard to identify optometrists with advanced competence in the medical diagnosis, treatment and management of primary and secondary disease and dysfunctions of the human eye, adnexa and visual tracts. Like dentistry, the majority of practicing optometrists are engaged in general practice.
    [Show full text]