Effective, No Nonsense Debt Compliance

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Effective, No Nonsense Debt Compliance Effective, No Nonsense Risk-Based Debt Compliance Understand Integrate Collaborate Mitigate Manage Jeff Wallace Jim Simpson Managing Director Managing Director Debt Compliance Services Debt Compliance Services www.debtcompliance.com 0 © 2017 Debt Compliance Services LLC Presentation Outline § Executive summary § How debt agreements are structured § Categorizing covenants by objective and risk § Writing concise yes/no questions § Using better tools than Excel § Q&A § About Debt Compliance Services 1 © 2017 Debt Compliance Services LLC Executive Summary Developing an effective, efficient debt compliance process requires: § Understanding how to read debt agreements § A non-legal approach for categorizing covenants by objective, type and risk § Developing a covenant checklist and questions initially requires only understanding the covenant’s required or prohibited action § Minimizing respondent interpretations by writing questions that simply ask about what happened to the covenant’s required or prohibited action § Minimizing the respondent burden by asking about covenants based on whether they need to be managed quarterly, annually, when triggered by events, or not at all § Having the Compliance Team responsible for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the responses and then evaluating them against the Team’s interpretation of the full covenant text § Using better tools than Excel to manage the process 2 © 2017 Debt Compliance Services LLC The Human Side of Debt Compliance § With few tools and little corporate-wide support, debt compliance is the worst job in Treasury § It’s demoralizing to have the responsibility for mistakes that can have grave consequences to the company and your career that you can do little to prevent or manage § Transition risk to a new manager is high, so compliance managers are stuck with the job § An insufficient process is a wasted opportunity for teaching staff debt compliance, a critical skill for negotiating successful debt agreements 3 © 2017 Debt Compliance Services LLC Presentation Outline § Executive summary § How debt agreements are structured § Categorizing covenants by objective and risk § Writing concise yes/no questions § Using better tools § Q&A § About Debt Compliance Services 4 © 2017 Debt Compliance Services LLC How to Read a Debt Agreement 5 © 2017 Debt Compliance Services LLC Covenant Elements A covenant is any specified action whose failure to do or not to do is an event of default (EoD) and will have many, if not all, of these elements: 6 © 2017 Debt Compliance Services LLC The Agreement Covenants are Assigned to Specific EoDs The agreement’s covenants are referenced in first four to six Events of Default: Event of Default Category Cure Period 1. Reps & Warranties and incorrect reports, certificates, financial 0 Days statements and other documents furnished 2. Validity, enforceability, etc. of Loan Documents 0 Days 3. Principal payments, including Mandatory Prepayments 0-1 Days 4. Interest, fee and other required payments 0-3 Days 5. Specifically identified covenants, such as maintenance, 0-5 Days negative, reporting and notifications 6. All other covenants in a catch-all phrasing 30 – 60 Days § Cure periods reflect the importance the lenders attach to each category – If a cure period is not given, then it is zero days 7 © 2017 Debt Compliance Services LLC The Remaining EoDs are Stand-Alone Covenants Other Events of Defaults The next EoDs are requirements not appearing elsewhere in the agreement that must be included in the covenant listing: § Cross-default § Judgments § Cross acceleration § Cancellation of Material Contracts § Guarantors’ default § ERISA Events § Voluntary/involuntary § Governmental Actions bankruptcy/insolvency § Revocation of Licenses § Change of Control Cure Periods – Varies by specific default event, typically 0-5/10, sometimes 30 days 8 © 2017 Debt Compliance Services LLC Presentation Outline § Executive summary § How debt agreements are structured § Categorizing covenants by objective and risk § Writing concise yes/no questions § Using better tools § Q&A § About Debt Compliance Services 9 © 2017 Debt Compliance Services LLC DCS’ Lender Objective Methodology Facilitates Identifying Controlling & Subordinate Covenants 10 © 2017 Debt Compliance Services LLC Evaluating Covenant Risk by Cure Periods 11 © 2017 Debt Compliance Services LLC Categorizing Covenant Types by Risk Drives the Frequency of the Compliance Review 12 © 2017 Debt Compliance Services LLC Presentation Outline § Managing default risk § How debt agreements are structured § Categorizing covenants by objective and risk § Writing concise yes/no questions § Using better tools than Excel § Q&A § About Debt Compliance Services 13 © 2017 Debt Compliance Services LLC Writing Concise Yes/No Questions § Write broad, open-ended questions in a yes or no format asking whether the covenant’s prohibited or required action happened or not – Encourage false positives rather than false negatives § Do not ask respondents to make materiality judgments: “Was there an asset sale?” not “Was there a material asset sale?” § To be precise and concise, it is often best to use the covenant’s defined terms with initial caps in the questions – Provide respondents access to these defined terms § It is the Compliance Team’s responsibility to – Ensure the responses are accurate and complete and – Evaluate the response against the covenant text to determine what course of action the response requires 14 © 2017 Debt Compliance Services LLC Writing “Action Only” Questions Edited Covenant Text example (over 600 words in total): Each Loan Party covenants … that… the Loan Parties … and …their Restricted Subsidiaries [will not] to do any of the following: • Enter into or permit to exist any encumbrance or restriction that (a) limits the ability (i) …to make Restricted Payments …, (ii) … to guarantee .. or (iii)… to incur ... Liens …. • provided, that, ….. Or provided that, ….this Section shall not prohibit (i) restrictions … in any agreement… (A) (1) …..permitted by clause (1) …. so long as… • the restrictions … in clause (a) or (b) that are contained in such agreement or (B) … (i)…, (ii) …, (iii) …, (iv) …, (v) … under clause (r) of the definition … Liens …., (vi) …, (vii) …, or (viii)… 15 © 2017 Debt Compliance Services LLC Writing “Action Only” Questions - 2 1. Identify the party or parties governed by the covenant 2. Identify only the restrictions, ignoring pre-conditions, exceptions, post-conditions, etc. 3. Write broad questions whether the parties violated the restrictions § Do any of the Loan Parties or the Restricted Subsidiaries have any encumbrance or restriction that limits their ability to maKe Restricted Payments? § Do any of the Loan Parties or their Restricted Subsidiaries have any encumbrance or restriction that limits their ability to guarantee the Indebtedness of any Loan Party? 4. If the response indicates an issue, the Compliance Team evaluates the facts against the full covenant text to determine what needs to be done 16 © 2017 Debt Compliance Services LLC Presentation Outline § Executive summary § How debt agreements are structured § Categorizing covenants by objective and risk § Writing concise yes/no questions § Using better tools than Excel § Q&A § About Debt Compliance Services 17 © 2017 Debt Compliance Services LLC Excel is a Poor, Static Tool for Debt Compliance Using Excel as § A multi-agreement covenant checklist and questions quickly becomes cumbersome, then unmanageable, and always subject to errors § As a questionnaire often results in incomplete answers and always difficulties in aggregating and then evaluating answers from multiple respondents § Any Excel summaries of the covenants are an unreliable source to ascertain compliance issues § As a debt calendar risks corruption when rolled over to next year and often has no explicit management oversight of the upcoming tasks to be done 18 © 2017 Debt Compliance Services LLC Using Better Tools Instead, it is more effective to develop a web debt compliance database structure that allows: § Developing the covenants and questions using an intelligent form § Web questionnaires that require full and complete answers § Web reporting to evaluate responses linked to the covenant text generating the questions § Effective, efficient interpretation of covenant issues with hyperlinked debt agreement webpages with multi-agreement contextual searching § A web calendar process for ensuring that all debt deliverables and payments are done on the required business day 19 © 2017 Debt Compliance Services LLC The DCS Covenant Manager℠ Web Solution 20 © 2017 Debt Compliance Services LLC Presentation Outline § Managing default risk § How debt agreements are structured § Categorizing covenants by objective and risk § Writing concise yes/no questions § Automate the debt compliance § Q&A § About Debt Compliance Services 21 © 2017 Debt Compliance Services LLC DCS’ Value Proposition § With its reputation, funding, GAAP, and SOX consequences, default risk is a significant business risk that requires a rigorous compliance process § We provide a comprehensive, best-in-class, risk-based, automated debt compliance process in the cloud that minimizes default risk by: – Identifying the at-risk covenants that must be managed quarterly or annually or when triggered by events from the low and no risk covenants. – Training and documenting compliance by SMEs outside of treasury on their truly-at risk covenants in their areas responsibilities with our integrated, risk- based, web questionnaires
Recommended publications
  • 3354:1-20-07.1 Tax-Exempt Debt Compliance Procedure
    3354:1-20-07.1 Tax-Exempt Debt Compliance Procedure (A) Tax-Exempt Debt The use of tax-exempt debt plays an important role in funding a significant portion of the College’s capital projects. As a result, the College realizes the importance of complying with federal and institutional requirements regarding the issuance and ongoing management of its tax-exempt debt. This procedure is intended to define compliance practices including compliance actions, records management, and process continuity within the Administration and Finance Department. (B) Definitions Post-Issuance Debt Compliance: The activities undertaken following the issuance of tax-exempt debt in order to comply with federal guidelines. Failure to comply with federal guidelines could potentially render the interest of debt as taxable to investors. Tax-Exempt Debt (Bonds) Issued by the College: Debt issued and managed (1) by the College; or (2) by a State authority at the request of the College and for which the College pays its pro-rata share of the debt service. (C) Maintaining Tax-Exempt Status Tax-exempt bonds are valid debt obligations used by the College to finance construction of facilities, permanent improvements, and to receive funds in anticipation of the collection of tax receipts. This tax-exempt status remains throughout the life of the debt provided that all applicable federal tax laws are satisfied. Post-issuance tax compliance begins with the debt issuance process itself and provides for a continuing focus on investments of debt proceeds and use of debt-financed property. In order to maintain the debt status as tax-exempt, the College must comply with post-issuance debt requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • In Chart 1, Our Benchmarking Shows That Many Companies Significantly
    October 2015 In Chart 1, our benchmarking shows that many companies significantly underestimate the risk of a default to their company compared to S&P’s experience of its ratings’ default rates. Also, it is our experience that many companies trivialize a technical default, thinking it is of no real consequence. Legally, any default is a default, and starts a chain of consequences that is hard to control, as Chart 2 shows. Borrowers have a legal obligation to review their compliance with all of their covenants of all of their debt agreements on at least a quarterly basis. In addition, to justify classifying the debt as long-term per ASC 470-10, companies must verify that the debt has no covenant violations, no matter how insignificant. For public companies, such verification is a necessary SOX control. Some 80% of the 350 companies who reported complying with Sarbanes-Oxley in the 2012 AFP Debt Compliance Benchmarking done with DCS, and in our 2015 Debt Compliance Benchmarking, include debt compliance as an explicit part of their SOX process. Please see Chart 3. Charts 4 and 5 show the magnitude of the task: there are many covenants that can only be adequately reviewed by Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) outside of Treasury. Yet for many companies, debt compliance is an insular, silo process within Treasury. Fully 50% of the companies in both studies did not have a debt compliance policy. Lacking a policy can have these consequences: 1. An incomplete and inadequate process with no debt compliance objectives, no assignment of responsibilities, and no documentation of compliance 2.
    [Show full text]
  • AFP Guide Negotiating and Complying with Credit Agreements
    AFP Guide Negotiating and Complying with Credit Agreements In collaboration with AFP Guide Negotiating and Complying with Credit Agreements Contents Introduction 1 What’s Driving the Interest in Renegotiation 2 Sidebar: Factors Driving Interest in Renegotiation 2 Knowing When it’s Time to Renegotiate 3 Sidebars: What Internal Factors Spark a Renegotiation 3 Rethink the Bank Groups 3 Understanding the Risk-Reward Tradeoff 4 Sidebar: Where the Pushback Occurs 4 Meeting the Compliance Challenge 4 Sidebars: What to Do When Facing a Potential Violation 6 Compliance Takeaways 7 The Role of Lawyers 7 Conclusion and Best Practices 7 Case Studies 9 Greif, Inc. 9 Scotts Miracle Gro 10 Natural Resources 11 Company The Carlyle Group 12 Granite Construction 12 AFP Guide Negotiating and Complying with Credit Agreements AFP Guide Negotiating and Complying with Credit Agreements Introduction For many U.S. companies, the pressure is on to review and renegotiate their credit facilities. Here’s why: • Interest rates have already began to inch upward. • There’s rising demand for credit because of an M&A surge and relatively cheap debt. • Banks are readying themselves for the onset of Basel III capital and liquidity regulations. As a result, many practitioners report that their banks are urging them to review and potentially reopen credit facilities, even if they’re not due for some time, in order to lock in advantageous terms. Interviews with bankers, consultants, lawyers and many practitioners confirm this trend. While credit agreements are a perennial issue for treasurers, they are more top of mind now. As companies look to renegotiate existing agreements or put in place new ones, they need to keep certain things in mind.
    [Show full text]
  • SUSTAINABLE Foundation Financial Results (Millions of Dollars) 2013 2012
    2013 Annual Report CREATING A SUSTAINABLE FOunDatiON FINANCIAL Results (millions of dollars) 2013 2012 Revenues 3,752.8 3,624.3 Gross profit 868.8 846.3 (1) EBITDA from operations 284.4 289.4 (1) Adjusted operating cash flow before restructuring costs 207.6 200.4 (1) Adjusted operating cash flow after restructuring costs 192.3 190.4 Net earnings 52.7 90.0 Dividends 73.7 67.1 (dollar per basic share except shares outstanding) (1) EBITDA from operations 2.31 2.59 (1) Adjusted operating cash flow before restructuring costs 1.69 1.79 (1) Adjusted operating cash flow after restructuring costs 1.56 1.70 Net earnings 0.43 0.80 Dividends 0.60 0.60 Weighted average shares outstanding (millions) 123.1 111.9 FINANCIAL POSITION (millions of dollars) 2013 2012 Total assets 2,141.1 2,032.1 Total liabilities 1,600.9 1,657.7 Net capital expenditures 71.9 39.3 Acquisitions 11.9 5.5 (2) Senior debt 578.7 489.6 (2) Total debt 1,073.2 1,181.1 (3) Senior debt/Compliance EBITDA 2.2x 1.9x (3) Total debt/Compliance EBITDA before restructuring costs 3.9x 4.3x (3) Total debt/Compliance EBITDA after restructuring costs 4.1x 4.5x (1) Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA), EBITDA from operations and adjusted operating cash flow (AOCF) are not recognized financial measures under International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). See Superior’s Management’s Discussion and Analysis, “Non-IFRS Financial Measures” for additional details. (2) Senior debt and total debt are stated before deferred issue costs.
    [Show full text]
  • Post Issuance Debt Compliance Policy.Pdf
    Roseville Finance Commission Agenda Item Memo To: Roseville Finance Commission From: Michelle Pietrick, Finance Director Date: January 12, 2021 Re: Item #5: Review Post Issuance Debt Compliance Policy Background The Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) recommends that issuers of bonds or other debt obligations should develop and adopt formal, written post-issuance compliance policies and procedures to assist in meeting compliance requirements and in preventing, identifying and correcting possible violations that might occur during the term that bonds are outstanding. Issuers should revisit these policies and procedures at least every three years or as directed by the municipal advisor when there are significant legal or regulatory changes. We issued general obligation bonds in December 2020 to refinance the 2011 outstanding bond issue and to finance water improvements in the next three years. As part of the process for issuing bonds, our municipal advisor Ehlers, requested copies of our policies. The City of Roseville had not previously adopted a Post Issuance Debt Compliance Policy. Attachment A is the draft Post Issuance Debt Compliance Policy which is consistent with the policy used by other cities. Ehlers has reviewed it to insure we have adequately included all the appropriate regulatory requirements. Attachment B is the draft Post Issuance Debt Compliance Procedures. These procedures are consistent with those used by other cities. This is brought to the Finance Commission for their review and discussion. It will go to the City Council on January 25, 2021. Staff Recommendation Accept the Post Issuance Debt Compliance Policy and procedures. Requested Commission Action The Commission is asked to approve the attached Post Issuance Debt Compliance Policy and Procedures which will then be forwarded to the City Council for formal adoption.
    [Show full text]
  • Le Sueur County, Minnesota Post-Issuance Debt Compliance Policy
    Le Sueur County, Minnesota Post-Issuance Debt Compliance Policy The Board of Commissioners (the “Board”) of Le Sueur County, Minnesota (the “County”) has chosen, by policy, to take steps to help ensure that all obligations will be in compliance with all applicable federal regulations. This policy may be amended, as necessary, in the future. IRS Background The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is responsible for enforcing compliance with the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”) and regulations promulgated thereunder (“Treasury Regulations”) governing certain obligations (for example: tax-exempt obligations, Build America Bonds, Recovery Zone Development Bonds and various “Tax Credit” Bonds). The IRS encourages issuers and beneficiaries of these obligations to adopt and implement a post-issuance debt compliance policy and procedures to safeguard against post-issuance violations. SEC Background T h e S e c u r i t i e s a n d E x c h a n g e C o m m i s s i o n ( S E C ) i s r e s p o n s i b l e f o r e n f o r c i n g c o m p l i a n c e w i t h t h e S E C R u l e 1 5 c 2 - 1 2 ( t h e “ R u l e ” ) . G o v e r n m e n t s o r g o v e r n m e n t a l e n t i t i e s i s s u i n g o b l i g a t i o n s g e n e r a l l y h a v e a r e q u i r e m e n t t o m e e t s p e c i f i c c o n t i n u i n g d i s c l o s u r e s t a n d a r d s s e t f o r t h i n c o n t i n u i n g d i s c l o s u r e a g r e e m e n t s ( “ C D A ” ) .
    [Show full text]
  • Ppp & Debt Compliance
    ALERT: PPP & DEBT COMPLIANCE What you need to know about the most recent stimulus package and why it matters: On December 27, 2020, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 was signed into law providing nearly $900 billion in additional aid related to the COVID-19 global pandemic. Since there were over 5,000 pages in the bill, our team summarized what you need to know about the potential accounting and financial reporting impact on your company’s cash flows and debt compliance options. Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) • The program received an infusion of $284 billion for additional loans extending the program through March 31, 2021, capped at a maximum amount of $2 million per borrower. • The PPP expanded eligibility and allowance for certain businesses to obtain a second loan if they have fewer than 300 employees and experienced a 25% or more reduction in revenue during any calendar quarter in 2020 versus 2019. • The PPP extended eligibility to most 501(c) organizations, housing cooperatives with 300 or fewer employees, and news organizations with 500 or fewer employees, and affirmed the eligibility of churches and other religious organizations. • Payroll costs must still comprise 60% of forgivable expenses, but the definition of eligible costs has been expanded to include more non-payroll related costs. • The eligibility and compliance process for loan forgiveness for loans of up to $150,000 has been simplified. • The PPP affords tax relief by allowing PPP loan expenses to be deducted and excludes PPP loans from taxable income. Troubled Debt Restructuring (TDR) • The optional relief from accounting for certain short-term modifications due to COVID-19 as a TDR was extended through January 1, 2022, if the loan modification was made as a direct response to COVID-19, providing accounting and regulatory relief as well as cost savings for lenders.
    [Show full text]
  • Targeted Fines and Fees Against Communities of Color
    TARGETED FINES AND FEES AGAINST COMMUNITIES OF COLOR COMMUNITIES FINES AND FEES AGAINST TARGETED U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS SEPTEMBER 2017 CIVIL RIGHTS & CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS CIVIL RIGHTS & CONSTITUTIONAL SEPT 2017 TARGETED FINES AND FEES AGAINST COMMUNITIES OF COLOR CIVIL RIGHTS & CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS U.S. COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS COMMISSION U.S. U.S. Commission on Civil Rights 1331 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20425 www.usccr.gov U.S. Commission on Civil Rights The U.S. Commission on Civil Rights is an independent, bipartisan agency established by Congress in 1957. It is directed to: • Investigate complaints alleging that citizens are being deprived of their right to vote by reason of their race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or by reason of fraudulent practices. • Study and collect information relating to discrimination or a denial of equal protection of the laws under the Constitution because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or in the administration of justice. • Appraise federal laws and policies with respect to discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin, or in the administration of justice. • Serve as a national clearinghouse for information in respect to discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws because of race, color, religion, sex, age, disability, or national origin. • Submit reports, findings, and recommendations to the President and Congress. • Issue public service announcements to discourage discrimination or denial of equal protection of the laws. Members of the Commission Catherine E. Lhamon, Chair Patricia Timmons-Goodson, Vice Chair Debo P.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Tax Policy in Times of Fiscal Consolidation
    ISSN 1725-3187 EUROPEAN ECONOMY Economic Papers 502 | August 2013 The role of tax policy in times of fi scal consolidation Savina Princen and Gilles Mourre Economic and Financial Aff airs European Commission Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs The role of tax policy in times of fiscal consolidation Proceedings of the workshop organised by the Directorate General for Economic and Financial Affairs held in Brussels on 18 October 2012 Edited by Savina Princen and Gilles Mourre EUROPEAN ECONOMY Economic Papers 502 Economic Papers are written by the Staff of the Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs, or by experts working in association with them. The Papers are intended to increase awareness of the technical work being done by staff and to seek comments and suggestions for further analysis. The views expressed are the author’s alone and do not necessarily correspond to those of the European Commission. Comments and enquiries should be addressed to: European Commission Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs Publications B-1049 Brussels Belgium E-mail: [email protected] This paper exists in English only and can be downloaded from the website ec.europa.eu/economy_finance/publications A great deal of additional information is available on the Internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (ec.europa.eu) KC-AI-13-502-EN-N ISBN 978-92-79-32328-7 doi: 10.2765/54257 © European Union, 2013 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 6 1.1 PURPOSE OF THE WORKSHOP 6 1.2 A FEW LESSONS FROM THE 2012 COMMISSION REPORT 'TAX REFORMS IN EU MEMBER STATES' by Gilles Mourre 8 1.2.1 The policy context 8 1.2.2 Tax reforms adopted in 2011 – 2012, when consolidation gains momentum 8 1.2.3 Main challenges relevant for tax policy in consolidation times 10 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Debt Policy;;
    Capital Debt Policy;; Category: Financial; Jurisdiction: Board Finance & Operations Committee; Approval Authority: Board of Governors; Established on: October 17, 2008; Amendments: February 1, 2013; September 27, 2018; PURPOSE The purpose of the Capital Debt Policy and Capital Debt Guidelines is to define: Responsibilities for the approval of new University external capital debt (borrowing) Maximum limits on the amount of total external capital debt incurred by the University The system of accountability SCOPE The intent of this policy is to align the strategic use of debt with the University’s investment policies to manage the overall cost of capital, minimize long-term costs for debt service and ensure the overall level of risk does not exceed acceptable levels. This policy provides a discipline and framework that will be used by management to evaluate the appropriate use of debt in capital financing plans and should be used in conjunction with the Excess Borrowings policy. This policy will be reviewed annually to ensure consistency with the University’s objectives and the external environment. POLICY 1.0 Capital borrowing will be undertaken by the administration only following approval of the capital project by the Board of Governors. Such approval shall include the total cost of the Capital Debt Policy Page 2 of 4 project, source(s) of funds for debt repayment and the period of time over which the debt is planned to be repaid. 2.0 The University will seek to borrow funds from external financial organizations in an effective and competitive manner taking into consideration factors such as term, cost of funds, security required and repayment options.
    [Show full text]
  • Military Lending Act: Your Top Questions Answered ? QUESTION # 1
    Military Lending Act: Your Top Questions Answered ? QUESTION # 1 What types of accounts are covered under the Military Lending Act (MLA)? It initially applied to three narrowly-defined “consumer credit” products: • Closed-end payday loans; • Closed-end auto title loans; and • Closed-end tax refund anticipation loans. The MLA now covers a wide range of credit transactions due to a new rule in 2015 by the Department of Defense, expands the definition of “consumer credit” covered by the regulation to more closely align with the definition of credit in the Truth in Lending Act and Regulation Z. This means MLA now covers a wide range of credit transactions including certain payday loans, vehicle title loans, tax refund anticipation loans, deposit advance loans, unsecured open-end lines of credit and credit cards (effective October 2017). Exemptions include loans to purchase or refinance a home, home equity lines of credit and auto finance loans where the loans is secured by the vehicle. QUESTION # 2 Who are the covered borrowers under the MLA? The DMDC database identifies individuals who meet one of the following criteria: • Is on active duty • Regular or reserve member of the Army, Navy, Marine Corps, Air Force, or Coast Guard, serving on active duty under a call or order that does not specify a period of 30 days or less, or such a member serving on Active Guard and Reserve duty as that term is defined in 10 u.s.c. 101 (d)(6) • The member’s spouse • The member’s child defined in 38 USC 101(4), or • An individual for whom the member provided more than one-half of the individual’s support for 180 days immediately preceding the extension of consumer credit covered by 32 C.F.R.
    [Show full text]
  • Credit Enhancement Practices
    CREDIT ENHANCEMENT PRACTICES SUPPORTING INVESTMENT IN INFRASTRUCTURE 1 CONTENTS ▪ General Overview……………………………………………………………………………………………………..3 • Definition…………………………………………………………………………………………………………...4 • Benefits……………………………………………………………………………………………………………...5 • Covered Losses……………………………………………………………………………………………….....7 • Forms of credit enhancement……………………………………………………………………………..10 • Case in focus: Partial credit guarantees ▪ Sample transaction……………………………………………………………………………………………………13 ▪ Examples of global credit enhancement facilities………………………………………………………20 2 CREDIT ENHANCEMENT PRACTICES General Overview ❖ Definition ❖ Benefits ❖ Covered risks ❖ Forms of credit enhancement ❖ Partial Credit Guarantees in detail 3 CREDIT ENHANCEMENT Definition ✓ Financial instrument designed to lower repayment risk of debt and security instruments ✓ Its main objective is to improve the credit profile of borrowers ✓ Its main function is to create more confidence among investors by decreasing perceived and actual risks of investment losses and that way expand financing resources for the beneficiary borrowers ✓ The customary use of credit enhancement in development finance is providing partial credit guarantees to qualifying borrowers against the risks associated with lending either on concessional and market-based terms ✓ In most instances credit enhancement is a complex structured finance transaction requiring strong knowledge and financial capacity of the guaranteeing institution CITY RESILIENCE PROGRAM 4 CREDIT ENHANCEMENT Main BenefitsBenefits 1. 2. 3. 4. % More
    [Show full text]