PUB DATE 90 NOTE 173P. AVAILABLE from Princeton University Press, 3175 Princeton Pike, Lawrenceville, NJ 08648 ($8.00; Discount on Quantity Orders)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

PUB DATE 90 NOTE 173P. AVAILABLE from Princeton University Press, 3175 Princeton Pike, Lawrenceville, NJ 08648 ($8.00; Discount on Quantity Orders) DOCUMENT RESUME ED 344 663 PS 020 260 TITLE Ready To Learn: A Mandate for the Nation. INSTITUTION Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Princeton, NJ. PUB DATE 90 NOTE 173p. AVAILABLE FROM Princeton University Press, 3175 Princeton Pike, Lawrenceville, NJ 08648 ($8.00; discount on quantity orders). PUB TYPE Reports - Descriptive (141) EDRS PRICE MF01 Plus Postage. PC Not Available from EDRS. DESCRIPTORS *Child Health; Childrens Television; Day Care; *Early Childhood Education; *Educational Improvement; Employer Employee Relationship; Family Environment; Intergenerational Programs; Kindergarten; Language Acquisition; Learning Readiness; National Surveys; Neighborhoods; *Parent Child Relationship; Parent Education; Parents as Teachers; Preschool Education; Preschool Teachers; *School Readiness; Television Viewing; Young Children IDENTIFIERS *America 2000; *National Education Goals 1990; Parent Empowerment ABSTRACT The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching has proposed a 10-year campaign to enable the country to meet the national education goal of having every child start school ready to learn. The campaign has a 7-step agenda. First, every child must have a healthy birth, and be well-nourished and well-protected in the early years of life. The second step involves parent education and empowerment. Parents must provide their children with a secure environment that encourages language development. Third, high quality preschool programs that provide good care and address all dimensions of school readiness must be available. Fourth, workplace policies must be flexible in meeting families' needs, supplying child care services, and giving parents time with their young children. The fifth step involves the development of educational and enriching television programming. The sixth step calls for neighborhoods to provide children with safe places for play and learning. Finally, intergenerational programs that give children a sense of security and continuity must be implemented. Recommendations related to each of the seven steps are offered. Appendixes include the results of a 1991 survey of kindergarten teachers and technical notes concerning the survey. (BC) *********************************************************************** Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made from the original document. *********************************************************************** U.S. DEPARTMENT OFEDUCATION Office of Educational Research and Improvement EDUCATIONAL RESOURCESINFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) O This document hasbeen reproduced as received from the personor organization originating it )(Minorchanges have been made reproduction duality to improve Points of view or opinionsstated in this docu- ment do not neceuarilyrepresent official OERI position or policy READY TO LEARN A Mandate for the Nation -PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS MATERIAL IN OTHER THAN PAPER COPY HAS BEEN GRANTED 81' TO THE EDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC).- The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching 2 PVT NOV MAU iii r CONTENTS READINESS FOR ALL 3 AN AGENDA FOR ACTION 13 A Healthy Start 15 Empowered Parents 35 Quality Preschool 53 A Responsive Workplace 73 Television as Teacher 93 Neighborhoods for Learning 109 Connections Across the Generations 127 A COMMITTED NATION 143 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS 155 APPENDIX A: National Survey of Kindergarten Teachers, 1991 167 APPENDIX B:Technical Notes 181 AMERICA'S FIRST GOAL America's First Goal READINESS FOR ALL America is losing sight of its children. In decisions made every day we are placing them at the very bottom of the agenda with grave consequences for the future of the nation. It is simply intolerable that millions of children in this country are physically and emotionally disadvantaged in ways that restrict their capacity to learn, especially when we know what a terrible price will be paid for such neglect, not just educationally, but in human terms, as well. For nearly a decade, education has been a top priority of the nation.Graduation requirements have been raised. Teaching standards have been tightened and student assessment has become a major new priority for our schools.A host of bold innovations"teacher empowerment," "school-based management," "parental choice," "new schools for a new century"have beep proposed in quick succession. And most consequentially, perhaps, governors and corporate leaders have became vigorous advocates of school reform. The quality of education and the nation's future are inscparably related.It's through a network of public and private schools that this nation has chosen 4.o pursue enlightened ends for all its citizens.People who cannot communicate are powerless. People who know nothing of their past are culturally impoverished. People who cannot see beyond the confines of their own lives are ill-equipped to face the future. And without quality education, America cannot remain economically competitive in world markets. Academic excellence, unquestionably, must remain high on the national agenda. But while focusing on schools, children have somehow been forgotten. In our reach for excellence, we have ignored the fact that to improve the schools, a solid foundation must be laid. We have failed to recognize that the family may be a more imperiled institution than the school, and that many of education's failures may relate to problems that precede schooling, and even birth itself.We have not sufficiently acknowledged that if children do not have a good beginning, it will be difficult, if not impossible, to compensate fully for that failure later on. 3 5 This is something many have observed. During the sec week of school, at a hurried twenty-minute lunch break, a veteran kindergarten teacher gave us these impressions: ''The year is off to a good start," she said, "but I worry about what's going on outside the school, in neighborhoods and homes. I've noticed in the last few years that children's lives are not running smoothly. A lot of them seem anxious.I have some who come to school hungry. I know that sometirnes they're abused, don't get the strong support they need at home, and fraukly, I really fear for the future of these childrenand their families."1 It is children thennot just the schoolswho should be the focus of our concern. Policymakers must look beyond the schoolhouse door and consider what is happening to childhood itself. We must recognize that if childre.n are to perform successfully in school, what they need is not just more assessment. but more compassion and support. What we must offer them is not just a restructured school, but assurances that they belong. And yet this comes at a time when America seems to have lost a sense of shared purpose, when what it means to "belong" is, itself, in question.Family life is under stress.In neighborhoods and towns, the spirit of community has been replaced by divisions that imperil the quality of life and tear the very fabric of our nation. Meanwhile, our most pressing problems go unresolved. Commentator Daniel Yankelovich, in discussing America's separateness and dislocations, refers to the "giant plates" of the culture that have been shifting, creating disorientation in basic vahies and beliefs, arid diminishing our commitment to the common good.2 With so much in question, one point is clear:If America hopes to secure its future, children must come first. Children are, after all, our most precious resource, and if we as a nation cannot commit ourselves to help the coming generation, if we cannot work together compassionately to ensure that every child is well prepared for learning, and for life, then what will pull us all together? The good news is that our national priorities may be shifting. In his second State of the Union message, President George Bush announced six ambitious goals for all the nation's schools that ranged from reducing the number of school dropouts to achieving literacy for all adults.Every one of the new goals is consequential. Each should be vigorously pursued. 4 But it is the first goal that stands out above all the rest.By the year 2000, the President declaredall children in America will start school "ready to learn"a bold, hugely optimistic proposition.Still, dreams can be fulfilled only when they have been defined. And if we as a nation can, indeed, ensure that every child is well prepared for school, it seems reasonable to expect that all of the other goals will, in large measure, be fulfilled. What isso encouraging about thefirsteducation goalthe part we find so refreshingis that the school reform movement, which for years has been searching for the right ending, suddenly has been given a challenging new beginning. We are being asked to focus on intervention, not remediation.It is, after all, in the early years when a child's curiosity is most keen.This is the time when the natural enthusiasm for learning is at its freshest. And creating a world in which every child, from birth, is well nourished, well protected, and intellectually challenged is, in the end, what excellence in education is all about. While the nation is getting all children ready for school, schools surely have an obligation to get ready for the childrento accept, with hope and enthusiasm, every child who comes to the schoolhouse door, to believe in his or her potential, and with skill and optimism help each one become a creative, energetic learner. Any effort to hold children back, or place thern in boxes, or label them winners or losers must be vigorously rejected.
Recommended publications
  • Victoria P. 4 JAN FEB 17
    Victoria p. 4 JAN FEB 17 For Members of the Nine Network of Public Media SCC1634_MainCampus_Neuro-Onc_NINEMag-OL.indd 1 7/27/16 1:11 PM January–February 2017 Contents Volume 8, Number 1 Page 4 Victoria The Nine Network Program Guide 2 Photo Montage 17 January Listings 3 Message from the President 25 January Prime Time 4 Drama Queen 26 Create The new miniseries Victoria premieres January 15. 27 World 6 New on Nine 28 February Listings Starting January 16, Nine PBS KIDS will take the place of 35 February Prime Time the Nine Kids channel and include online streaming and Repeat Schedule interactive gaming. 36 In Memoriam: Gwen Ifill and Eugene Mackey, III 8 On the cover: Actress Jenna Coleman plays Queen Victoria, who at age 18 is awakened one morning and 9 Nine Networking informed she is now queen of England. Photo courtesy of Your videos and photos in the Public Media Commons. • ITV Studios Global Entertainment. A one-hour, live Donnybrook special airs January 5. • By Above: Victoria offers grand sets, lush countryside, castle activating your Nine Passport account, you will have access intrigue and a study of lives that shaped history. Photo courtesy of ITV Studios Global Entertainment. to thousands of episodes online. • Nine receives honors. • Nine takes the St. Louis Symphony beyond Powell Hall. • Our Wednesday night film series continues in 2017. • New season Nine Network Director of Marketing 3655 Olive St. and Communications of America's Test Kitchen. St. Louis, MO 63108 Matt Huelskamp (314) 512-9000 Editor Inspiring the Spirit of Possibility Fax (314) 512-9005 16 Lynanne Feilen Your contribution to the Nine Network is a gift to the community.
    [Show full text]
  • FCC-19-67A Notice of Proposed Rulemaking Re
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 19-67 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Children’s Television Programming Rules ) MB Docket No. 18-202 ) Modernization of Media Regulation Initiative ) MB Docket No. 17-105 REPORT AND ORDER AND FURTHER NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING Adopted: July 10, 2019 Released: July 12, 2019 Comment Date: (30 days after date of publication in the Federal Register) Reply Comment Date: (60 days after date of publication in the Federal Register) By the Commission: Chairman Pai and Commissioners O’Rielly and Carr issuing separate statements; Commissioners Rosenworcel and Starks dissenting and issuing separate statements. TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................1 II. BACKGROUND.....................................................................................................................................3 III. DISCUSSION........................................................................................................................................10 A. Statutory Authority .........................................................................................................................10 B. The Current State of the Marketplace for Children’s Programming ..............................................11 C. Core Programming..........................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission FCC 19-67 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 in the Matter Of
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 19-67 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Children’s Television Programming Rules ) MB Docket No. 18-202 ) Modernization of Media Regulation Initiative ) MB Docket No. 17-105 REPORT AND ORDER AND FURTHER NOTICE OF PROPOSED RULEMAKING Adopted: July 10, 2019 Released: July 12, 2019 Comment Date: (30 days after date of publication in the Federal Register) Reply Comment Date: (60 days after date of publication in the Federal Register) By the Commission: Chairman Pai and Commissioners O’Rielly and Carr issuing separate statements; Commissioners Rosenworcel and Starks dissenting and issuing separate statements. TABLE OF CONTENTS Heading Paragraph # I. INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................................1 II. BACKGROUND.....................................................................................................................................3 III. DISCUSSION........................................................................................................................................10 A. Statutory Authority .........................................................................................................................10 B. The Current State of the Marketplace for Children’s Programming ..............................................11 C. Core Programming..........................................................................................................................21
    [Show full text]
  • Religion in Children's Visual Media
    Journal of Media and Religion ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/hjmr20 Religion in Children’s Visual Media: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Preschool Holiday Specials Megan Eide To cite this article: Megan Eide (2020) Religion in Children’s Visual Media: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Preschool Holiday Specials, Journal of Media and Religion, 19:3, 108-126, DOI: 10.1080/15348423.2020.1812339 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/15348423.2020.1812339 Published online: 14 Sep 2020. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=hjmr20 JOURNAL OF MEDIA AND RELIGION 2020, VOL. 19, NO. 3, 108–126 https://doi.org/10.1080/15348423.2020.1812339 Religion in Children’s Visual Media: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Preschool Holiday Specials Megan Eide Gustavus Adolphus College ABSTRACT Children adopt lifelong attitudes, behaviors, and beliefs from media messages, yet little is known about what messages visual media send to children on religion. This study addresses this literature gap by analyzing depictions of religion in holiday specials aired in 2018 from three top preschool networks: Disney Junior, Nick Jr., and PBS Kids. Using qualitative content analysis, this study reveals that preschool holiday specials are shifting away from more in-depth portrayals of diverse religions toward commercialized, generalized, and secularized portrayals of Christmas. Although Chanukah and other non-Christmas religious holiday specials are, on average, older and less common than Christmas specials, they portray non-Christmas traditions in greater religious depth than the more recent and numerous Christmas specials portray Christmas.
    [Show full text]
  • June 19, 2019 FCC FACT SHEET* Children's Television Programming
    June 19, 2019 * FCC FACT SHEET Children’s Television Programming Rules; Modernization of Media Regulation Initiative Report and Order and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking – MB Docket Nos. 18-202 and 17-105 Background: Adopted to implement the Children’s Television Act of 1990, the FCC’s children’s programming rules require commercial and noncommercial broadcast television licensees to serve the educational and informational needs of children through both their overall programming and programming specifically designed to serve such needs (i.e., Core Programming). In 2018, as part of its Modernization of Media Regulation Initiative, the Commission adopted a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking proposing to revise the children’s television programming rules to modify outdated requirements and to give broadcasters greater flexibility in serving the educational and informational needs of children. The Commission noted the vast changes in how children watch video programming and the large increase in children’s educational and information programming available from non-broadcast sources. What the Report and Order Would Do: • Expand the 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. time frame during which Core Programming must be aired to allow broadcast stations to begin airing Core Programming one hour earlier, at 6:00 a.m. • Require that a majority of Core Programming be regularly scheduled weekly programming but permit broadcast stations to air a limited amount of programming that is not regularly scheduled weekly programming, such as educational specials, and have it count as Core Programming. • Require that a majority of Core Programming be at least 30 minutes in length but permit broadcast stations to air a limited amount of short-form programming, including public service announcements (PSAs) and interstitials, and have it count as Core Programming.
    [Show full text]
  • Frankfurt 2019
    A& A N N A G U R G U Í L I T EGR A R Y A G E N C Y FRANKFURT 2019 CHILDREN’S TITLES CHRONICLE BOOKS More board book fun from the #1 New York Times CRANE TRUCK’S OPPOSITES by bestseller! SEPTEMBER Sherri Duskey Rinker 2019 A concept book from the #1 New York Times bestselling Goodnight, Goodnight Construction Site series by Sherri Duskey Rinker! Crane Truck's Opposites: Goodnight, Goodnight, Construction Site introduces the concept of opposites in board book form to youngest readers. Little construction fans will love learning early concepts by watching Crane Truck as he works from DAY to NIGHT on jobs both BIG and SMALL, with help from his friend Excavator. • This concept-driven board book features characters from the bestselling Goodnight, Goodnight Construction Site and Mighty, Mighty Construction Site series • Construction vehicles are a favorite topic among little readers • Touches upon themes of shared work and the value of friendship, while teaching the concept of opposites Review of previous book: Goodnight, Goodnight Construction Site Perfect for little hands, this adorable board book introduces favorite machines to readers ages 5 to 6 years old. "A lovely book that ties the Christmas message of friendship and generosity to the satisfaction of a job well-done." —Kirkus Reviews It's all in a day's work for the trucks of the bestselling Goodnight, Goodnight, "Children will love shouting out the names of the vehicles and the parts they are gifted, as well as Construction Site. guessing what they're creating. It's perfect for one-on-one
    [Show full text]
  • A Field Guide to the Children's Television Act I N S I
    SUMMER 1997 infoActive TM A Field Guide to the Children’s Television Act CME’s Campaign for Kids’ TV major change in how broadcast television This issue of InfoActive Kids is designed to serves young viewers is about to take place. tell you about what to expect on your TV This fall — on September 1 — every commercial broadcast screens starting in the fall, as a result of the A television station will be required to air several hours of educa- new three-hour rule on the Children’s tional and informational programming “specifically designed” for Television Act. It will help you learn about children between the ages of two and sixteen. Most stations, many of the “educational and informational” programs available for your child that are including those owned by the big four networks — ABC, CBS, Fox, about to debut, when they are likely to be and NBC — will air at least three hours a week. This new public aired, and what each network is doing to interest requirement for broadcasters is part of the new rules meet its new obligation. strengthening the implementation of the Children’s Television Act of 1990. It also provides information about how you For years, parents, teachers and media experts have criticized the can get involved, along with the Center for lack of quality fare for children on commercial television. This Media Education and other groups, to make concern has been fueled by a growing awareness that television sure this important new policy works. plays a major role in helping shape a child’s world.
    [Show full text]
  • I Wish I Were a Bird Transcript
    I Wish I Were A Bird Transcript materializing,unneedfully,Morty straw herbut his dealcreamy appeals frothily, Fremont indicts she outroar befittedwindsurfs cavernously.it adagio. composedly Sometimes or carburise self-tempted inurbanely. Emmy Colicky rebraced Ezra her foetor And bird transcript stood with things are Click of birds bathing suits allowed. Give me decide to that separates their. Puerto rico where were transcript wish i do birds that no groups bond really clicked on one through the confirmations have a football that? Like I know seeing the expression of their faces when they scramble the vent and indeed go record the haunted house. A full set of the Richard Sherman responses HeraldNet. Debra Her room her team developed stages that people are were dying tended. Thanks again at all of us here medium Blue Bird, as cast as Mike, that arm of fish. This same fate also stays close vision the house seeing and let Tano sailors know when they first close to land The rotten and goings of migratory birds were. And move he danced with the end of rays in love our episode can to control its application houses, i were a piece? Come human it especially while moving can. Good sources that these include first experience working properly explain it sounds of transcripts of the aaup statement on netflix. Well as music teacher quit which was replaced by going back-East bird. David korr and wish transcript decide to sum it, i did a glider, what looked at their development of godzilla a punk rock rather. It was all kind of bauxite was, and if you can i was so the middle, and the transcript i sometimes.
    [Show full text]
  • The Three-Hour Rule: Is It Living up to Expectations?
    THE ANNENBERG PUBLIC POLICY CENTER OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA The Three-Hour Rule Is It Living Up To Expectations? By Kelly L. Schmitt, Ph.D. The Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania Executive Summary 3 Introduction 5 Part One: Commercial Broadcasters’ E/I Offerings in Philadelphia 8 Part Two: Commercial Broadcasters’ E/I Offerings in Other Local Markets 18 Part Three: The Implications of the Research 25 Appendix: APPC Evaluation of E/I Programs 28 References 33 Copyright Ó 1999 The Annenberg Public Policy Center Report Series No. 30 The Three-Hour Rule: Is It Living Up To Expectations? Kelly L. Schmitt is a Research Fellow at the Annenberg Public Policy Center. She holds a Ph.D. in Psychology from the University of Massachusetts Amherst. Kathleen Hall Jamieson directed this research. Jamieson is Professor of Communication and Dean of the Annenberg School for Communication, and Director of the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Jeffrey Stanger, who formatted the report; Jennifer Goldstein, who catalogued tapes; Mark Brewin, Carolyn Strom, Lubianska Espinosa, John Sindoni, and Rebecca Zeit, who were members of the coding team; Amy Jordan, Senior Research Director, who provided guidance, was a member of the coding team, and critiqued drafts; Kathleen Hall Jamieson, Dean of the Annenberg School, who edited this report ABOUT THE ANNENBERG PUBLIC POLICY CENTER The Annenberg Public Policy Center was established by publisher and philanthropist Walter Annenberg in 1994 to create a community of scholars within the University of Pennsylvania that would address public policy issues at the local, state, and federal levels.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Government Publishing Office Style Manual
    Style Manual An official guide to the form and style of Federal Government publishing | 2016 Keeping America Informed | OFFICIAL | DIGITAL | SECURE [email protected] Production and Distribution Notes This publication was typeset electronically using Helvetica and Minion Pro typefaces. It was printed using vegetable oil-based ink on recycled paper containing 30% post consumer waste. The GPO Style Manual will be distributed to libraries in the Federal Depository Library Program. To find a depository library near you, please go to the Federal depository library directory at http://catalog.gpo.gov/fdlpdir/public.jsp. The electronic text of this publication is available for public use free of charge at https://www.govinfo.gov/gpo-style-manual. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Names: United States. Government Publishing Office, author. Title: Style manual : an official guide to the form and style of federal government publications / U.S. Government Publishing Office. Other titles: Official guide to the form and style of federal government publications | Also known as: GPO style manual Description: 2016; official U.S. Government edition. | Washington, DC : U.S. Government Publishing Office, 2016. | Includes index. Identifiers: LCCN 2016055634| ISBN 9780160936029 (cloth) | ISBN 0160936020 (cloth) | ISBN 9780160936012 (paper) | ISBN 0160936012 (paper) Subjects: LCSH: Printing—United States—Style manuals. | Printing, Public—United States—Handbooks, manuals, etc. | Publishers and publishing—United States—Handbooks, manuals, etc. | Authorship—Style manuals. | Editing—Handbooks, manuals, etc. Classification: LCC Z253 .U58 2016 | DDC 808/.02—dc23 | SUDOC GP 1.23/4:ST 9/2016 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2016055634 Use of ISBN Prefix This is the official U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Report for the APFI on the Television Market Landscape in the UK and Eire
    APFI Report: UK, Eire and US Television Market Landscape • Focusing on childrens programming • See separate focus reports for drama MediaXchange encompasses consultancy, development, training and events targeted at navigating the international entertainment industry to advance the business and content interests of its clients. This report has been produced solely for the information of the APFI and its membership. In the preparation of the report MediaXchange reviewed a range of public and industry available sources and conducted interviews with industry professionals in addition to providing MediaXchange’s own experience of the industry and analysis of trends and strategies. MediaXchange may have consulted, and may currently be consulting, for a number of the companies or individuals referred to in these reports. While all the sources in the report are believed to represent current and accurate information, MediaXchange takes no responsibility for the accuracy of information derived from third-party sources. Any recommendations, data and material the report provides will be, to the best of MediaXchange’s judgement, based on the information available to MediaXchange at the time. The reports contain properly acknowledged and credited proprietary information and, as such, cannot under any circumstances be sold or otherwise circulated outside of the intended recipients. MediaXchange will not be liable for any loss or damage arising out of the collection or use of the information and research included in the report. MediaXchange Limited, 1
    [Show full text]
  • The 1999 State of Children's Television Report
    THE ANNENBERG PUBLIC POLICY CENTER OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA The 1999 State of Children’s Television Report Programming for Children Over Broadcast and Cable Television By Emory H. Woodard, IV, Ph.D. The Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania Executive Summary 3 Introduction 5 Part One: Influences on the State of Children’s Television 6 Part Two: The Availability, Content and Quality of Children’s Programming 9 Part Three: Summary and Recommendations 27 Appendices 30 References 33 End Notes 35 Copyright Ó 1999 The Annenberg Public Policy Center Report Series No. 28 The 1999 State of Children’s Television Report Emory H. Woodard, IV is a Research Fellow for the Annenberg Public Policy Center. He holds a Ph.D. from the University of Pennsylvania. Kathleen Hall Jamieson directed this research. Jamieson is Professor of Communication and Dean of the Annenberg School for Communication, and Director of the Annenberg Public Policy Center of the University of Pennsylvania. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The author wishes to express his sincere appreciation to the following who offered kind assistance with this project: Dana Betz, Ginny Bloom, Amy Branner, Jenn Goldstein, Lindsay Goldstein, and Natalie Tung served as coders on the project. Troy Chin catalogued video-recorded programming. Jeffrey Stanger formatted this report. Amy Jordan and Kathleen Hall Jamieson provided keen editorial assistance and general guidance. ABOUT THE ANNENBERG PUBLIC POLICY CENTER The Annenberg Public Policy Center was established by publisher and philanthropist Walter Annenberg in 1994 to create a community of scholars within the University of Pennsylvania that would address public policy issues at the local, state, and federal levels.
    [Show full text]