DOCSLIB.ORG

A Field Trip to Ancient Plate Tectonics Structures in Massachusetts and New York October 10-12, 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Field Trip to Ancient Plate Tectonics Structures in Massachusetts and New York October 10-12, 2014 A Field Trip to Ancient Plate Tectonics Structures in Massachusetts and New York October 10-12, 2014 12.001: Introduction to Geology Led by Profs. Oliver Jagoutz and Taylor Perron Paleogeographic map of North America removed due to copyright restrictions. 1 Equipment Checklist Boots or sturdy shoes Change of clothing for two days Sweater or sweatshirt Warm hat Raincoat Pens and pencils Water bottle Camera Sunscreen Notebook Colored pencils Brunton compass* Hand lens* Hammer* *We will provide these for you 2 Keeping a Field Notebook (for this trip you can use the blank pages in the back of this guide for a field notebook): As practicing geologists, your field observations provide all of your data once you are back in the lab. Your memory is not as good as you think it is. It is therefore important that you take complete, organized, and neat notes. At each site you should make a series of notations about the site, the characteristics of the outcrop, and the individual rock units. 1. Setting the stage a. Your name, date, name of site, companions, and coordinates b. Formation name, probable stratigraphic level/age of rocks 2. Outcrop description a. Step back and look over the outcrop. Note its gross features. Are there any folds, faults, or unconformities evident? Are there any stratigraphic subdivisions that are visible at this scale? b. Make a sketch of the outcrop, including on it your observations from above. Be sure to include an estimated scale and compass orientation of the view (e.g. ‘looking towards the NE’). If you take a picture, note the picture number. 3. Rock description a. General appearance: Note bedding character, the thickness and lateral continuity of the beds; color of weathered and fresh surfaces; weathering characteristics (does it fall to bits, turn to mud, or remain blocky, etc.?), response to hammering (does it ring or thud, crumble, or is it tough, how does it fracture, etc.). b. Rock Type: Describe features encompassed by i. Grain size and shape. ii. Mineralogy. iii. Sedimentary structures. iv. Fossils. 4. Integration a. Suggest the probable paleoenvironments represented at each stop. 3 Introduction The purpose of this field trip is to introduce you to geologic evidence for the past action of plate tectonics. We will see various rocks from different tectonic settings that have been used to reconstruct the complex Paleozoic history of the eastern United States and Canada. The geology of the eastern U.S. is dominated by multiple rifting and collision events related to at least two complete sequences of the Wilson cycle, the hypothesized cyclical opening and closing of ocean basins that accompanies the formation and breakup of supercontinents. In particular, we will see evidence for the assembly and disassembly of the supercontinent Rodinia from ~0.5-1.3 billion years (Ga) ago, the subsequent collision of two volcanic islands arcs with Laurentia (proto-North American continent that rifted from Rodinia) between 440-350 million years ago (Ma), and the disassembly of the supercontinent Pangea after 250 Ma. We will not see any geologic evidence for the assembly of Pangea (the Allegheny orogeny), which occurred between ~350 and 250 Ma, since most of the affected rocks were rifted away during its breakup. We will begin the trip in the West, on the passive margin sequences of Laurentia, and work our way towards the East through a complex arc-continent collision zone. We will visit rocks formed or metamorphosed during the following events, listed in order of time of occurrence (see Fig. 1). 1. The Grenville orogeny associated with formation of the supercontinent Rodinia (Proterozoic eon ~1 Ga): Stop 1 2. Rift deposits associated with breakup of Rodinia (Ediacaran period): Stop 1 3. Passive margin of Laurentia (Cambrian to Ordovician periods): Stop 1 4. Taconic Orogeny associated with collision of Laurentia with the Shelburne Falls island arc (Middle Ordovician epoch): Stops 2-10 5. The Acadian orogeny associated with the collision of Laurentia with Avalon island arc (Early Devonian epoch) 6. Rifting from opening of the Atlantic Ocean associated with breakup of supercontinent Pangea (Jurassic to Triassic periods): Stop 11 An overview of the geologic structures in our field area is shown in Fig. 2. 4 Fig. 1. The geologictimescale. GSA GEOLOGIC TIME SCALE v. 4.0 Courtesy of The America.The SocietyGeological ofpermission.of Used with Courtesy CENOZOIC MESOZOIC PALEOZOIC PRECAMBRIAN CHRON . MAGNETIC MAGNETICHIST . BDY. AGE POLARITY PICKS AGE POLARITY PICKS AGE PICKS AGE PERIOD EPOCH AGE PERIOD EPOCH AGE PERIOD EPOCH AGE EON ERA PERIOD AGES (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) (Ma) NAR Y HIST ANOM. (Ma) ANOM. CHRON. HOLOCENE 1 C1 QUATER­ 0.01 30 C30 66.0 541 CALABRIAN PLEISTOCENE* 1.8 31 C31 MAASTRICHTIAN 252 2 C2 GELASIAN 70 CHANGHSINGIAN EDIACARAN 2.6 Lopin­ 254 32 C32 72.1 635 2A C2A PIACENZIAN WUCHIAPINGIAN PLIOCENE 3.6 gian 33 260 260 3 ZANCLEAN LA TE CAPITANIAN NEOPRO­ 5 C3 CAMPANIAN Guada­ 265 750 CRYOGENIAN 5.3 80 C33 WORDIAN TEROZOIC 3A MESSINIAN lupian 269 C3A 83.6 ROADIAN 272 850 7.2 SANTONIAN 4 86.3 KUNGURIAN C4 280 279 TONIAN CONIACIAN VA N I A N 4A Cisura­ C4A TORTONIAN 90 89.8 1000 1000 PERMIAN ARTINSKIAN 10 5 1 1.6 TURONIAN lian C5 93.9 290 SAKMARIAN STENIAN CENOMANIAN 296 SERRAVALLIAN 34 C34 ASSELIAN 299 5A 100 100 300 GZHELIAN 1200 C5A 13.8 LATE 304 KASIMOVIAN 307 1250 MESOPRO­ 15 LANGHIAN ECTASIAN 5B C5B ALBIAN MIDDLE MOSCOVIAN TEROZOIC 16.0 ACEOUS 5C C5C 110 315 PENNSYL­ 1400 EARLY 5D C5D MIOCENE 113 320 BASHKIRIAN 323 5E C5E NEOGENE BURDIGALIAN SERPUKHOVIAN 1500 CALYMMIAN 6 C6 APTIAN LATE 20 120 331 20.4 6A C6A CHA TTIAN EARLY 1600 M0r 126 6B C6B AQUITANIAN M1 340 MIDDLE VISEAN MISSIS­ M3 BARREMIAN SIPPIAN STATHERIAN C6C 23.0 6C 130 M5 CRET 131 347 1750 HAUTERIVIAN 7 C7 CARBONIFEROUS EARLY TOURNAISIAN 1800 M10 134 25 7A C7A 359 8 C8 VALANGINIAN M12 360 140 M14 139 FAMENNIAN OROSIRIAN 9 C9 M16 28.1 M18 BERRIASIAN 2000 PROTEROZOIC 10 C10 LATE PALEOPRO­ M20 145 372 2050 30 11 C11 TEROZOIC 150 M22 TITHONIAN FRASNIAN 12 380 5 RUPELIAN 152 C12 LATE 383 RHYACIAN M25 KIMMERIDGIAN GIVETIAN OLIGOCENE MIDDLE 388 2250 M29 157 EIFELIAN 2300 13 C13 33.9 160 6 4 393 OXFORDIAN DEVONIAN 35 15 C15 1 400 EMSIAN SIDERIAN 16 C16 CALLOVIAN 166 PRIABONIAN BATHONIAN 408 17 168 EARLY PRAGIAN C17 170 MIDDLE BAJOCIAN 411 2500 2500 37.8 170 AALENIAN LOCHKOVIAN 18 174 419 40 C18 BARTONIAN CHANGES 420 PRIDOLI 423 19 LUDLOW LUDFORDIAN 426 NEOARCHEAN C19 TOARCIAN GORSTIAN 41.2 180 HOMERIAN 427 WENLOCK SHEINWOODIAN 430 2750 20 183 433 2800 LLANDO­ TELYCHIAN C20 PLIENSBACHIAN AERONIAN 439 EARLY 440 VERY 441 LUTETIAN SILURIAN RHUDDANIAN 45 190 444 JURASSIC 191 HIRNANTIAN 445 KATIAN MESO­ RAPID POLARITY CHANGES RAPID POLARITY RAPID POLARITY 3000 21 SINEMURIAN LATE 453 C21 SANDBIAN ARCHEAN EOCENE 47.8 200 199 458 HETTANGIAN 201 460 ALEOGENE DARRIWILIAN 22 MIDDLE 50 C22 RHAETIAN 467 3200 P DAPINGIAN 470 3250 23 C23 YPRESIAN 210 209 FLOIANAGE 1 0 EARLY 478 480 24 ORDOVICIAN TREMADOCIAN PALEO­ 485 C24 LATE 55 NORIAN FURON­ 490 ARCHEAN 220 JIANGSHANIAN 56.0 GIAN 494 3500 25 PAIBIAN ARCHEAN C25 497 THANETIAN 500 GUZHANGIAN 501 3600 26 228 Epoch 3 DRUMIAN 230 AGE 5 505 C26 59.2 509 60 SELANDIAN CARNIAN AGE 4 3750 Epoch 2 514 237 AGE 3 EOARCHEAN 27 61.6 520 C27 LADINIAN 521 240 MIDDLE 241 AGE 2 28 TRIASSIC C28 CAMBRIAN 529 DANIAN ANISIAN TERRE­ 4000 4000 ALEOCENE 65 29 247 NEUVIAN C29 P FORTUNIAN EARLY OLENEKIAN 250 HADEAN 66.0 250 INDUAN 30 C30 252 540 541 *The Pleistocene is divided into four ages, but only two are shown here. What is shown as Calabrian is actually three ages—Calabrian from 1.8 to 0.78 Ma, Middle from 0.78 to 0.13 Ma, and Late from 0.13 to 0.01 Ma. Walker, J.D., Geissman, J.W., Bowring, S.A., and Babcock, L.E., compilers, 2012, Geologic Time Scale v. 4.0: Geological Society of America, doi: 10.1130/2012.CTS004R3C. ©2012 The Geological Society of America. The Cenozoic, Mesozoic, and Paleozoic are the Eras of the Phanerozoic Eon. Names of units and age boundaries follow the Gradstein et al. (2012) and Cohen et al. (2012) compilations. Age estimates and picks of boundaries are rounded to the nearest whole number (1 Ma) for the pre-Cenomanian, and rounded to one decimal place (100 ka) for the Cenomanian to Pleistocene interval. The numbered epochs and ages of the Cambrian are provisional. REFERENCES CITED Cohen, K.M., Finney, S., and Gibbard, P.L., 2012, International Chronostratigraphic Chart: International Commission on Stratigraphy, www.stratigraphy.org (last accessed May 2012). (Chart reproduced for the 34th International Geological Congress, Brisbane, Australia, 5–10 August 2012.) Gradstein, F.M, Ogg, J.G., Schmitz, M.D., et al., 2012, The Geologic Time Scale 2012: Boston, USA, Elsevier, DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-444-59425-9.00004-4. Fig. 2a. Overview of rocks and structures to be visited on this field trip (after Bradley and Kidd 1991). Courtesy of the Geological Society of America. Used with permission. Source: Bradley, D. C., and W. S. F. Kidd. "Flexural Extension of the Upper Continental Crust in Collisional Foredeeps." Geological Society of America Bulletin 103, no. 11 (1991): 1416-38. 6 Fig. 2b. Overview of rocks and structures to be visited on this field trip (Suppe 1985). © source unknown. All rights reserved. This content is excluded from our Creative Commons license. For more information, see http://ocw.mit.edu/help/faq-fair-use/.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fractured Shale Gas Potential in New York
    FRACTURED SHALE GAS POTENTIAL IN NEW YORK David G. HILL and Tracy E. LOMBARDI TICORA Geosciences, Inc., Arvada, Colorado, USA John P. MARTIN New York State Energy Research and Development Authority, Albany, New York, USA ABSTRACT In 1821, a shallow well drilled in the Devonian age shale ushered in a new era for the United States when natural gas was produced, transported and sold to local establishments in the town of Fredonia, New York. Following this discovery, hundreds of shallow shale wells were drilled along the Lake Erie shoreline and eventually several shale gas fields were established southeastward from the lake in the late 1800’s. Since the mid 1900’s, approximately 100 wells have been drilled in New York to test the fractured shale potential of the Devonian and Silurian age shales. With so few wells drilled over the past century, the true potential of fractured shale reservoirs has not been thoroughly assessed, and there may be a substantial resource. While the resource for shale gas in New York is large, ranging from 163-313 trillion cubic feet (Tcf) and the history of production dates back over 180 years, it has not been a major contributor to natural gas production in New York. A review of the history and research conducted on the shales shows that the resource in New York is poorly understood and has not been adequately tested. Other shales such as the Silurian and Ordovician Utica Shale may also hold promise as new commercial shale gas reservoirs. Experience developing shale gas plays in the past 20 years has demonstrated that every shale play is unique.
    [Show full text]
  • Strike and Dip Refer to the Orientation Or Attitude of a Geologic Feature. The
    Name__________________________________ 89.325 – Geology for Engineers Faults, Folds, Outcrop Patterns and Geologic Maps I. Properties of Earth Materials When rocks are subjected to differential stress the resulting build-up in strain can cause deformation. Depending on the material properties the result can either be elastic deformation which can ultimately lead to the breaking of the rock material (faults) or ductile deformation which can lead to the development of folds. In this exercise we will look at the various types of deformation and how geologists use geologic maps to understand this deformation. II. Strike and Dip Strike and dip refer to the orientation or attitude of a geologic feature. The strike line of a bed, fault, or other planar feature, is a line representing the intersection of that feature with a horizontal plane. On a geologic map, this is represented with a short straight line segment oriented parallel to the strike line. Strike (or strike angle) can be given as either a quadrant compass bearing of the strike line (N25°E for example) or in terms of east or west of true north or south, a single three digit number representing the azimuth, where the lower number is usually given (where the example of N25°E would simply be 025), or the azimuth number followed by the degree sign (example of N25°E would be 025°). The dip gives the steepest angle of descent of a tilted bed or feature relative to a horizontal plane, and is given by the number (0°-90°) as well as a letter (N, S, E, W) with rough direction in which the bed is dipping.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 GEOLOGY
    Chapter 4 GEOLOGY CHAPTER 4 GEOLOGY ...................................................................................................................................... 4‐1 4.1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................ 4‐2 4.2 BLACK SHALES ................................................................................................................................................. 4‐3 4.3 UTICA SHALE ................................................................................................................................................... 4‐6 4.3.2 Thermal Maturity and Fairways ...................................................................................................... 4‐14 4.3.3 Potential for Gas Production ............................................................................................................ 4‐14 4.4 MARCELLUS FORMATION ................................................................................................................................. 4‐15 4.4.1 Total Organic Carbon ....................................................................................................................... 4‐17 4.4.2 Thermal Maturity and Fairways ...................................................................................................... 4‐17 4.4.3 Potential for Gas Production ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Tracking the Evolution of the Grenville Foreland Basin
    Krabbendam et al: Detrital zircon and rutile in the Sleat and Torridon groups Tracking the evolution of the Grenvillian Foreland Basin: constraints from sedimentology and detrital zircon and rutile in the Sleat and Torridon groups, Scotland Maarten Krabbendam a, *, Helen Bonsor a, Matthew S.A. Horstwood b, Toby Rivers c a) British Geological Survey, Lyell Centre, Research Avenue South, Edinburgh EH14 4AP, Scotland, UK b) NERC Isotope Geosciences Laboratory, British Geological Survey, Keyworth NG12 5GG, UK c) Department of Earth Sciences, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, NL Canada A1B 3X5 * Corresponding author. Email: [email protected] Keywords: foreland basin; provenance; detritus; Grenville Orogen; U-Pb geochronology; Neoproterozoic 1 Krabbendam et al: Detrital zircon and rutile in the Sleat and Torridon groups Abstract The Grenville Orogen, although occupying a key position in the Rodinia supercontinent, lacks a clear foreland basin in its type area in eastern Canada. Early Neoproterozoic siliciclastic rocks in northern Scotland, however, are now interpreted as remnants of a proximal Grenvillian foreland basin. Analysis of the sedimentology and detrital zircon and rutile of the Torridon and underlying Sleat groups provide new constraints on the evolution of this basin. Youngest U-Pb detrital zircon grains yield ages of 1070-990 Ma in both groups, consistent with a Grenvillian source. The proportions of older age components vary throughout the stratigraphy. The lower Sleat Group shows a dominant ca. 1750 Ma peak, likely derived from local Rhinnian rocks in Scotland and Ireland uplifted within the Grenville Orogen. In the upper Sleat Group and Torridon Group, detrital zircon peaks at ca.
    [Show full text]
  • Marcellus/Utica Shale
    Marcellus/Utica Shale Presented by Jeff Wlahofsky Jay Meglich George Adams Discussion Topics • Common Industry Terms and Definitions • Video of Horizontal Drilling Process • Overview of Geology Differences Between Marcellus and Utica Shale • Background Regarding Marcellus Activity in PA • Current State of the Shale Gas Industry • Planning Opportunities for Income Deferral or Capital Gain Tax Treatment 2 Industry Terms and Definitions • Abandoned Well – A well no longer in use; a dry hole that, in most states, must be properly plugged • Bonus – Usually, the bonus is the money paid by the lessee for the execution of an oil and gas lease by the landowner. Another form is called an oil or royalty bonus. This may be in the form of an overriding royalty reserved to the landowner in addition to the usual one‐eighth or 12.5% royalty. • Christmas Tree – An assembly of valves mounted on the casing head through which a well is produced. The Christmas tree also contains valves for testing the well and for shutting it in if necessary. The “Christmas Tree” includes blow‐out preventer valves. 3 Industry Terms and Definitions (cont’d) • Completion – To finish a well so that it is ready to produce oil or gas. After reaching total depth (T.D.), casing is run and cemented; casing is perforated opposite the producing zone, tubing is run, and control and flow valves are installed at the wellhead. Well completions vary according to the kind of well, depth, and the formation from which the well is to produce 4 Industry Terms and Definitions (cont’d) • Delay Rentals – These are amounts paid to the lessor for the privilege of deferring the commencement of a well on the lease.
    [Show full text]
  • FM 5-410 Chapter 2
    FM 5-410 CHAPTER 2 Structural Geology Structural geology describes the form, pat- secondary structural features. These secon- tern, origin, and internal structure of rock dary features include folds, faults, joints, and and soil masses. Tectonics, a closely related schistosity. These features can be identified field, deals with structural features on a and m appeal in the field through site inves- larger regional, continental, or global scale. tigation and from remote imagery. Figure 2-1, page 2-2, shows the major plates of the earth’s crust. These plates continually Section I. Structural Features undergo movement as shown by the arrows. in Sedimentary Rocks Figure 2-2, page 2-3, is a more detailed repre- sentation of plate tectonic theory. Molten material rises to the earth’s surface at BEDDING PLANES midoceanic ridges, forcing the oceanic plates Structural features are most readily recog- to diverge. These plates, in turn, collide with nized in the sedimentary rocks. They are adjacent plates, which may or may not be of normally deposited in more or less regular similar density. If the two colliding plates are horizontal layers that accumulate on top of of approximately equal density, the plates each other in an orderly sequence. Individual will crumple, forming mountain range along deposits within the sequence are separated the convergent zone. If, on the other hand, by planar contact surfaces called bedding one of the plates is more dense than the other, planes (see Figure 1-7, page 1-9). Bedding it will be subducted, or forced below, the planes are of great importance to military en- lighter plate, creating an oceanic trench along gineers.
    [Show full text]
  • Geology: Ordovician Paleogeography and the Evolution of the Iapetus Ocean
    Ordovician paleogeography and the evolution of the Iapetus ocean Conall Mac Niocaill* Department of Geological Sciences, University of Michigan, 2534 C. C. Little Building, Ben A. van der Pluijm Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1063. Rob Van der Voo ABSTRACT thermore, we contend that the combined paleomagnetic and faunal data ar- Paleomagnetic data from northern Appalachian terranes identify gue against a shared Taconic history between North and South America. several arcs within the Iapetus ocean in the Early to Middle Ordovi- cian, including a peri-Laurentian arc at ~10°–20°S, a peri-Avalonian PALEOMAGNETIC DATA FROM IAPETAN TERRANES arc at ~50°–60°S, and an intra-oceanic arc (called the Exploits arc) at Displaced terranes occur along the extent of the Appalachian-Cale- ~30°S. The peri-Avalonian and Exploits arcs are characterized by Are- donian orogen, although reliable Ordovician paleomagnetic data from Ia- nigian to Llanvirnian Celtic fauna that are distinct from similarly aged petan terranes have only been obtained from the Central Mobile belt of the Toquima–Table Head fauna of the Laurentian margin, and peri- northern Appalachians (Table 1). The Central Mobile belt separates the Lau- Laurentian arc. The Precordillera terrane of Argentina is also charac- rentian and Avalonian margins of Iapetus and preserves remnants of the terized by an increasing proportion of Celtic fauna from Arenig to ocean, including arcs, ocean islands, and ophiolite slivers (e.g., Keppie, Llanvirn time, which implies (1) that it was in reproductive communi- 1989). Paleomagnetic results from Arenigian and Llanvirnian volcanic units cation with the peri-Avalonian and Exploits arcs, and (2) that it must of the Moreton’s Harbour Group and the Lawrence Head Formation in cen- have been separate from Laurentia and the peri-Laurentian arc well tral Newfoundland indicate paleolatitudes of 11°S (Table 1), placing them before it collided with Gondwana.
    [Show full text]
  • The Taconic Orogeny in Newfoundland: a Three-Stage Process
    atlantic geology . volume 43 . 2007 83 geochronology and isotope geology, indicated that this model was incomplete. We will present new evidence that the Taconic orogeny comprises three separate accretionary events starting in the Late Cambrian and finishing in the Late Ordovician. Taconic 1 is represented by ca. 495 Ma west-directed obduc- tion of the ca. 510 Ma Lushs Bight oceanic Tract onto the peri- Laurentian Dashwoods microcontinent. Subduction is inferred to have initiated at a spreading centre abandoned during an inboard ridge jump responsible for separation of Dashwoods from Laurentia. Partial subduction of the buoyant Dashwoods forced subduction to step back into the Humber seaway, which led to formation of the ca. 490 Ma Baie Verte oceanic tract (BVOT). Dextral oblique closure of the Humber seaway first formed the Notre Dame arc (489–477 Ma) built on Dashwoods and the coeval Snooks Arm arc built on the BVOT, followed by their collision with Laurentia (Taconic 2) and each other. The obliquity of convergence induced large-scale translations of continental ribbons of the Laurentian margin from the lati- tude of Labrador to central Newfoundland. After a magmatic gap of c. 7–10 my, the Notre Dame arc records a voluminous flare-up of predominantly tonalite magmatism (464–459 Ma) during the waning stages of Taconic 2. Magmatism overlaps with strong deformation and comprises both arc and non-arc- like tonalite. We relate this flare-up to break-off of the oceanic lithosphere of the downgoing Laurentian slab. Taconic 3 is rep- resented by 455–450 Ma collision between a peri-Laurentian arc terrane and the peri-Gondwanan Popelogan-Exploits arc and their composite accretion to Laurentia.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Drilling Activity and Production
    (Sections) 2.0 REGIONAL DRILLING ACTIVITY AND PRODUCTION Naming Convention: 2-digit state code/3-digit county code/5-character identifier Example: 37027_OC12 (Pennsylvania, Butler County, Outcrop Sample 12) For all other wells, the file naming convention leads with the API number. The leading API number/Project ID is then followed by the code for the file category or categories under which the data are classified. For a standard file containing information on a single well or sample, the following naming convention is used: Naming Convention: API number or Project ID_File Type Code(s)_Optional Description Example: 34003636910000_SRA_TOC_BP_Chemical_Plant_Well_4.xls As of July 9, 2014, there were 5696 files organized under this naming convention. In addition to these files, there were an additional 35 files that contain data for multiple wells. These files, which are often final results of data analyzed by service companies or consultants, can contain results for many different wells or samples. For these document types, the following naming convention is used: Naming Convention: 2-digit state code/000/MLTPL_File Type Codes_Optional Description Example: 34000MLTPL_SRA_TOC_XRD_OvertonEnergy.pdf Individual wells contained in the file are stored in a second table, which is linked by the file name, allowing the user to search by any of the individual API numbers/Project IDs contained within the multiple well file. As the data collected, generated, and interpreted by the research team became finalized, new file categories were created and populated with project results. In addition, a general file with all header data was created, allowing users to import project wells into various subsurface mapping programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleozoic 3: Alabama in the Paleozoic
    UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA GY 112: Earth History Paleozoic 3: Alabama in the Paleozoic Instructor: Dr. Douglas W. Haywick Last Time The Paleozoic Part 2 1) Back to Newfoundland 2) Eastern Laurentian Orogenies (Appalachians) 3) Other Laurentian Orogenies (Antler, Ouachita) (web notes 25) Laurentia (Paleozoic North America) Even though this coastline of Laurentia was a passive continental margin, a plate tectonic boundary was rapidly approaching… A B A B Laurentia (Paleozoic North America) The resulting Taconic Orogeny first depressed the seafloor Laurentia (localized transgression) and A Island arc then pushed previously deposited passive continental B margin sediments up into thrust fault mountains. Baltica There was only minimal metamorphism and igneous A intrusions. B Middle Ordovician Laurentia (Paleozoic North America) Laurentia Baltica Middle Ordovician Laurentia (Paleozoic North America) Laurentia Baltica Middle Ordovician Laurentia (Paleozoic North America) The next tectonic event (the Acadian Orogeny) was caused Laurentia by the approach of Baltica A B Baltica A B Baltica Baltica Late Ordovician Laurentia (Paleozoic North America) The Acadian Orogeny was more extensive and more intense (metamorphism and A lots of igneous intrusions) B A B Early Devonian Laurentia (Paleozoic North America) The Acadian Orogeny was more extensive and more intense (metamorphism and lots of igneous intrusions) Early Devonian Laurentia (Paleozoic North America) Lastly, along comes Gondwanna and…. …well you get the idea. A B B A B Mississippian Laurentia (Paleozoic North America) Lastly, along comes Gondwanna and…. …well you get the idea. A B B A B Pennsylvannian Suture zone Laurentia (Paleozoic North America) Lastly, along comes Gondwanna and…. …well you get the idea.
    [Show full text]
  • Semester -3 Civil Engineering
    CIVIL ENGINEERING SEMESTER -3 CIVIL ENGINEERING Year of MECHANICS OF CATEGORY L T P CREDIT CET201 Introduction SOLIDS PCC 3 1 0 4 2019 Preamble: Mechanics of solids is one of the foundation courses in the study of structural systems. The course provides the fundamental concepts of mechanics of deformable bodies and helps students to develop their analytical and problem solving skills. The course introduces students to the various internal effects induced in structural members as well as their deformations due to different types of loading. After this course students will be able to determine the stress, strain and deformation of loaded structural elements. Prerequisite: EST 100 Engineering Mechanics Course Outcomes: After the completion of the course the student will be able to Prescribed Course Description of Course Outcome Outcome learning level Recall the fundamental terms and theorems associated with CO1 Remembering mechanics of linear elastic deformable bodies. Explain the behavior and response of various structural CO2 Understanding elements under various loading conditions. Apply the principles of solid mechanics to calculate internal stresses/strains, stress resultants and strain energies in CO3 Applying structural elements subjected to axial/transverse loadsand bending/twisting moments. Choose appropriate principles or formula to find the elastic CO4 constants of materials making use of the information Applying available. Perform stress transformations, identify principal planes/ CO5 stresses and maximum shear stress at a point
    [Show full text]
  • Where in New York Are the Marcellus and Utica Shales??
    Where in New York are the Marcellus and Utica Shales?? How do they get to the gas resource and how do they get the gas out of the ground? What are the concerns about this entire process and what can/should we do about it? Schlumberger, Inc Depth and extent of the Marcellus Shale Marcellus, NY type section Source – dSGEIS, 2009 East-West Geologic Section of the Marcellus Shale Across Southern New York Thickening of Oatka Creek Thinning of Oatka Creek Lash and Engelder, 2009 and Union Springs members North-South Geologic Section Across New York State Source – dSGEIS, 2009 Source – dSGEIS, 2009 Medina SS Central/ Western NY Marcellus Stratigraphy Oatka Creek Cherry Valley Union Springs Oil and Gas wells are not new in Pennsylvania and New York……. …and there are different regulations in and within each state. Multiple steel casings with high-strength cement to isolate well from surrounding aquifers and bedrock units. What is different about Marcellus/Utica shale gas development? East-northeast trending J1 fractures more closely spaced and cross-cut by less well- developed, northwest-trending J2 fractures Dual porosity gas reservoir where fractures drain rapidly and matrix drain slowly Drill horizontal wells to the north-northwest, or south- southeast that cross and Free gas and adsorbed drain densely developed J1 gas in matrix fractures Connect matrix porosity to the wellbore by intersecting multiple J1 fractures Marcellus Shale Gas Development Horizontal Drilling in Black Shale with High-Volume Hydraulic Fracturing 3,500 ft 3,500 4,000 ft Meyer (2009) Meyer (2009) Microseismic Monitoring of Hydraulic Fracturing “Typical” Drillpad Design Water-source pond Drill cuttings pond Drilling Phase – drillrig, pumps, supplies, frack tanks (a month or two) Hydro-fracking Phase – (a week or two) Injection pumps, supplies, and many frack tanks for fresh and flowback waters Where do you get the water for fracking? Inter- basin Trans- fer Each source has its own set of concerns…….
    [Show full text]