DOCSLIB.ORG

Chehalis and Humptulips River Basins

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

61 124° 123°30' 123° 122°30' JEFFERSON 47° EXPLANATION 30' GRAYS HARBOR REAL-TIME SURFACE-WATER SITE LAKE OR RESERVOIR SITE KITSAP KING B ig C 12035380 051015 20 MILES rk k r o r F o F 12035400 051525 1020 30 KILOMETERS t s t e s 12036000 W a E MASON 12039005 k r r ork e o v r F F i e r v R k i e US r l k R ive o r 101 d R o s F t d F p s i i t e M l s tu a t W s p E a m k , E r r e u e r o e H v h F i C c r R o e v t o m i um s l ia n l e R u h y a a PIERCE W q k W u o 12035000 h 12037400 p q s H o i o s l t US 47° Hoquiam W C a 101 Montesano S River Grays Aberdeen Chehalis SR US 12035002 THURSTON Harbor 105 101 12031000 I 12035100 5 Grand Tenino US 12 hMound Bucoda uck Che alis mch 12026150 u R GRAYS HARBOR k iver o o 12025700 PACIFIC 12027500 Ri k 12026400 v S e r Centralia k North For 12025100 , ork Chehalis r F e h v t 12021800 Ne i 12024400 ou wa R S ukum SR r r, 12020000 e e 508 iv v r 12025000 N i R e ewau R v I kum i 5 SR R 6 s Pe Ell s 12024000 i i Willapa l l a WASHINGTON a 46° Bay h eh 30' he h C C 12020800 k r o F th ou LEWIS S WAHKIAKUM COWLITZ PACIFIC OCEAN Figure 10. Location of surface-water stations in the Chehalis and Humptulips River Basins. 62 Wynoochee EXPLANATION Lake Storage Real-time surface-water station West Fork since 1972 Lake orreservoir site Humptulips River 12035380 Wynoochee Dam RM 51.8 12039005 Station number Powerhouse RM East Fork 12035400 RM 28.1 River mile 28.1 Humptulips River RM 51.3 Big Creek Stream—Arrow shows direction of flow 12039005 RM 49.3 Tunnel or pipe—Arrow shows direction of flow RM 22.9 12036000 RM 40.6 RM 28.3 Schafer Creek Anderson City of RM 16.8 Creek East Fork Aberdeen Middle Fork RM diversion 8.1 West Fork Fork 12037400 Middle RM 5.9 East Fork River HUMPTULIPS RIVER West Hoquiam River Fork 12035000 Wynoochee 12035100 RM 2.3 Creek 12031000 Wishkah River Satsop River GRAYS CHEHALISRM 13.2 RIVER Cloquallum RM 33.3 HARBOR RM RM 12035002 RM RM 0.15 13.0 RM 19.5 20.2 25.2 12027500 12026400 12026150 Skookumchuck 12025700 RM 59.9 RM RM 6.4 RM RM 20.7 3.8 Reservoir RM 28.8 6.9 RM RM 66.9 Skookumchuck21.9 Storage River began 1971 PACIFIC OCEAN Creek Hanaford Centralia Steam Electric Project diversion Diversion forcities of Centralia and Chehalis CHEHALIS RIVER 12024400 12025100 North Fork RM 7.7 RM 74.3 Newaukum River RM Newaukum South Fork 75.2 River RM Newaukum River 12025000 10.9 12024000 RM 4.1 RM 22.8 12021800 RM 86.0 12020800 RM South Fork RM 16.2 88.0 Chehalis River 12020000 RM 101.8 Figure 11. Schematic diagram showing surface-water stations in the Chehalis and Humptulips River Basins. CHEHALIS RIVER BASIN 63 12020000 CHEHALIS RIVER NEAR DOTY, WA ° ° 1⁄ 1⁄ LOCATION.--Lat 46 37'03", long 123 16'35", in NE 4NW 4 sec.14, T.13 N., R.5 W., Lewis County, Hydrologic Unit 17100103, on right bank 1.3 mi south of Doty, 1.6 mi upstream from Elk Creek, 3.4 mi north of Pe Ell, and at mile 101.8. DRAINAGE AREA.--113 mi2. PERIOD OF RECORD.--October 1939 to current year. REVISED RECORDS.--WSP 1316: 1943(M). WSP 1446: 1946(M). WDR-WA-72-1: 1945(M). GAGE.--Water-stage recorder and crest-stage gage. Datum of gage is 301.1 ft above NGVD of 1929 (river-profile survey). Prior to Oct. 1, 1961, nonrecording gage and crest-stage gage at site 50 ft upstream at datum 1 ft higher. Oct 1, 1961 to Sept. 15, 1995, water-stage recorder at site 150 ft upstream at datum 1 ft higher. Prior to Feb. 24, 1999, at same site at datum 1 ft higher. REMARKS.--Records good except for estimated daily discharges, which are fair. No regulation or diversion upstream from station. Chemical analyses July 1959 to September 1970, sedment records October 1961 to December 1964 (partial-record station). AVERAGE DISCHARGE.--66 years (water years 1940-2005), 571 ft3/s, 68.65 in/yr, 413,600 acre-ft/yr. EXTREMES FOR PERIOD OF RECORD.--Maximum discharge, 28,900 ft3/s, Feb. 8, 1996, gage height, 20.37 ft, from rating curve extended above 8,000 ft3/s, on basis of slope-area measurement at gage height 18.36 ft; minimum discharge, 16 ft3/s, Aug. 31, Sept. 3, 4, 7, 8, 1992. EXTREMES FOR CURRENT YEAR.--Peak discharges greater than base discharge of 6,800 ft3/s and maximum (*): Discharge Gage height Discharge Gage height Date Time (ft3/s) (ft) Date Time (ft3/s) (ft) Dec 11 0230 *9,270 *11.35 Jan 18 0315 8,610 10.88 Minimum discharge, 21 ft3/s, Sept. 25-27, gage height, 0.90 ft. DISCHARGE, CUBIC FEET PER SECOND WATER YEAR OCTOBER 2004 TO SEPTEMBER 2005 DAILY MEAN VALUES DAY OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP 1 99 460 279 237 281 208 1,560 246 241 91 39 28 2 94 1,870 239 214 261 179 1,440 328 218 89 38 26 3 87 1,460 218 194 244 169 1,290 273 205 86 37 25 4 85 934 222 180 269 153 1,130 261 188 79 35 25 5 81 698 230 166 321 144 932 239 181 77 34 25 6 144 546 258 167 345 136 783 222 187 88 33 25 7 112 438 640 272 381 130 725 207 172 88 33 24 8 127 365 2,590 351 343 127 670 207 158 92 33 23 9 361 322 1,930 321 318 121 573 287 150 171 32 23 10 489 281 3,750 290 295 117 504 487 144 122 32 26 11 323 270 5,840 263 279 112 621 497 152 113 32 39 12 253 249 2,300 285 275 109 714 411 143 111 32 32 13 223 228 1,390 334 275 105 933 346 136 100 31 27 14 196 211 1,240 307 261 103 927 307 129 91 30 26 15 179 209 1,120 288 241 100 829 304 123 82 29 26 16 168 212 863 304 227 116 1,490 302 118 78 28 26 17 759 203 679 1,460 213 142 1,480 280 149 75 30 25 18 793 301 554 6,900 204 116 1,110 616 135 68 32 25 19 910 338 471 3,300 194 120 873 877 139 62 30 24 20 766 290 400 1,840 182 618 710 920 121 59 29 24 21 578 258 351 1,320 173 723 587 746 110 57 28 23 22 474 e250 314 996 164 534 498 694 109 56 28 22 23 417 e235 276 792 155 429 451 606 108 55 28 22 24 371 270 248 650 150 356 404 517 98 52 27 22 25 348 1,760 254 549 145 302 393 441 95 49 27 21 26 413 936 372 477 139 1,420 348 382 93 47 26 21 27 365 608 302 428 133 3,850 316 333 114 46 26 21 28 e330 453 270 385 141 2,090 290 295 124 44 26 22 29 e305 362 248 358 --- 2,540 269 268 106 42 29 22 30 416 323 231 325 --- 2,230 257 249 97 41 37 72 31 454 --- 217 304 --- 1,540 --- 231 --- 40 32 --- TOTAL 10,720 15,340 28,296 24,257 6,609 19,139 23,107 12,379 4,243 2,351 963 792 MEAN 346 511 913 782 236 617 770 399 141 75.8 31.1 26.4 MAX 910 1,870 5,840 6,900 381 3,850 1,560 920 241 171 39 72 MIN 81 203 217 166 133 100 257 207 93 40 26 21 AC-FT 21,260 30,430 56,130 48,110 13,110 37,960 45,830 24,550 8,420 4,660 1,910 1,570 CFSM 3.06 4.53 8.08 6.92 2.09 5.46 6.82 3.53 1.25 0.67 0.27 0.23 IN. 3.53 5.05 9.32 7.99 2.18 6.30 7.61 4.08 1.40 0.77 0.32 0.26 STATISTICS OF MONTHLY MEAN DATA FOR WATER YEARS 1940 - 2005, BY WATER YEAR (WY) MEAN 278 905 1,257 1,221 1,146 889 575 274 145 70.3 46.7 77.7 MAX 1,121 2,131 2,486 2,888 2,940 1,870 1,285 700 390 183 124 357 (WY) (1998) (1956) (1995) (1953) (1999) (1956) (1996) (1948) (1968) (1983) (1968) (1959) MIN 20.5 57.6 217 176 236 216 207 125 62.8 33.9 23.3 22.0 (WY) (1988) (1994) (1977) (1977) (2005) (1992) (1941) (1994) (1992) (1951) (2003) (1998) 64 CHEHALIS RIVER BASIN 12020000 CHEHALIS RIVER NEAR DOTY, WA—Continued SUMMARY STATISTICS FOR 2004 CALENDAR YEAR FOR 2005 WATER YEAR WATER YEARS 1940 - 2005 ANNUAL TOTAL 163,237 148,196 ANNUAL MEAN 446 406 571 HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN 911 1956 LOWEST ANNUAL MEAN 253 2001 HIGHEST DAILY MEAN 5,840 Dec 11 6,900 Jan 18 19,200 Feb 8, 1996 LOWEST DAILY MEAN 34 Jul 29 21 Sep 25 16 Sep 3, 1992 ANNUAL SEVEN-DAY MINIMUM 35 Jul 25 22 Sep 22 17 Aug 29, 1992 ANNUAL RUNOFF (AC-FT) 323,800 293,900 413,600 ANNUAL RUNOFF (CFSM) 3.95 3.59 5.05 ANNUAL RUNOFF (INCHES) 53.74 48.79 68.65 10 PERCENT EXCEEDS 935 914 1,450 50 PERCENT EXCEEDS 270 231 258 90 PERCENT EXCEEDS 59 29 36 e Estimated CHEHALIS RIVER BASIN 65 12020800 SOUTH FORK CHEHALIS RIVER NEAR WILDWOOD, WA ° ° 1⁄ 1⁄ LOCATION.--Lat 46 26'42", long 123 04'57", in NW 4 NE 4 sec.17, T.11 N., R.3 W., Lewis County, Hydrologic Unit 17100103, on left bank at Wildwood Road bridge, 0.4 mi downstream from Black Creek, 1.2 mi southeast of Wildwood, and at mile 16.2.
Recommended publications
  • Supp III a Basin Description

    Supp III a Basin Description

    Supplement Section III — Basin Description Information Base Part A — Basin Description The Chehalis River Basin is the largest river basin in western Washington. With the exception of the Columbia River basin, it is the largest in the state. The basin extends over eight counties. It encompasses large portions of Grays Harbor, Lewis, and Thurston counties, and smaller parts of Mason, Pacific, Cowlitz, Wahkiakum, and Jefferson counties. For purposes of water resources planning under the Washington State Watershed Planning Act of 1998, the Chehalis Basin was divided into two Water Resource Inventory Areas (WRIAs), WRIA 22 and WRIA 23, depicted here with surrounding WRIA numbers and in relation to the whole state of Washington. Chehalis Basin Watershed — County Land Areas County Area (sq.mi.) Area (acres) Percentage Grays Harbor 1,390 889,711 50.3% Thurston 323 206,446 11.7% Lewis 770 493,103 27.9% Mason 206 132,146 7.5% Pacific 66 42,040 2.4% Cowlitz 8 5,427 0.3% Jefferson 2 1,259 0.07% Wahkiakum .1 37 0.002% Total 2,766 1,770,169 Source: Chehalis Watershed GIS Watershed Boundaries The basin is bounded on the west by the Pacific Ocean, on the east by the Deschutes River Basin, on the north by the Olympic Mountains, and on the south by the Willapa Hills and Cowlitz River Basin. Elevations vary from sea level at Grays Harbor to the 5,054-foot Capitol Peak in the Olympic National Forest. The basin consists of approximately 2,766 square miles. The Chehalis WRIA 22 River system flows through three distinct eco-regions before emptying into Grays Harbor near Aberdeen (Omernik, 1987): • The Cascade ecoregion (including the Olympic Mountains) is char- acterized by volcanic/sedimentary bedrock formations.
  • Chehalis River

    Chehalis River

    Northwest Area Committee OCTOBER 2015 CHEHALIS RIVER Geographic Response Plan (CHER GRP) 1 This page was intentionally left blank. 2 CHEHALIS RIVER GRP OCTOBER 2015 CHEHALIS RIVER Geographic Response Plan (CHER GRP) October 2015 3 CHEHALIS RIVER GRP OCTOBER 2015 Spill Response Contact Sheet Required Notifications for Oil Spills and Hazardous Substance Releases Federal Notification - National Response Center (800) 424-8802* State Notification - Washington Emergency Management (800) 258-5990* Division - Other Contact Numbers - U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Washington State Region 10 - Spill Response (206) 553-1263* Dept Archaeology & Hist Preserv (360) 586-3065 - Washington Ops Office (360) 753-9437 Dept of Ecology - Oregon Ops Office (503) 326-3250 - Headquarters (Lacey) (360) 407-6000 - RCRA/CERCLA Hotline (800) 424-9346 - SW Regional Office (Lacey) (360) 407-6300 - Public Affairs (206) 553-1203 Dept of Fish and Wildlife (360) 902-2200 - Emergency HPA Assistance (360) 902-2537* U.S. Coast Guard -Oil Spill Team (360) 534-8233* Sector Columbia River Dept of Health (Drinking Water) (800) 521-0323 - Emergency / Watchstander (503) 861-2242* - After normal business hours (877) 481-4901 - Command Center (503) 861-6211* Dept of Natural Resources (360) 902-1064 - Incident Management Division (503) 861-6477 - After normal business hours (360) 556-3921 - Station Grays Harbor (360) 268-0121* Dept of Transportation (360) 705-7000 13th Coast Guard District (800) 982-8813 State Parks & Rec Commission (360) 902-8613 National Strike Force (252) 331-6000 State Patrol - District 1 (253) 538-3240 Coordination - Pacific Strike Center Team (415) 883-3311 State Patrol - District 5 (360) 449-7909 State Patrol - District 8 (360) 473-0172 National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration Scientific Support Coordinator (206) 526-6829 Tribal Contacts Weather (206) 526-6087 Chehalis Confederated Tribes (360) 273-5911 - Cultural Resources Ext.
  • Elma Washington ~ Now and Then

    Elma Washington ~ Now and Then

    Area Information Elma, WA around 1898 to 1900 Main Street Looking East From 5th Street By Luke Bailey Image 2010 “Satsop Development Park was the winner of the Governor’s 2004 Economic Development Award for Infrastructure.” Innovative features in a unique setting Find out more today about Satsop Development Park, recently designated one of the top 10 industrial and office parks in Washington state for 2005 by Washington CEO magazine. Exceptional features include: Diversely routed fiber optics Only 5 minutes from Elma off Highway 12 Unlimited bandwidth potential Intercom phone system serving 20,000 ports 24/7 network monitoring, resolution & assistance Exceptional security in location and buildings Uninterruptible AC power system Room for all types of businesses to grow Back-up generators Regional workforce of over 68,000 people Visit our website: www.satsop.com 1.866.5SATSOP or 360.482.1600 [email protected] Grays Harbor Public Development Authority An economic powerhouse creating jobs and investment in Grays Harbor TABLE OF CONTENTS Welcome From the Elma Chamber of Commerce ......4 Elma Government & Community Services ........... 5 The Elma Microtel Inn & Suites .......................... 6 Chamber Parks & Recreation Elma & East County ....... 7-13 Of Elma Washington ~ Now and Then ............. 15-22 ELMA SCHOOL DISTRICT #68 ...................... 22-23 Commerce Quarter Midget Racing ......................... 25 Welcomes Sprint Car Racing and the World of Outlaws .... 26 You to Community Events ........................... 27-28 The Elma Murals of Elma ............................. 30-31 Map of Elma ................................... 32 Community Census and Demographics ~ Elma ............. 33-35 Business & Shopping Directory .............. 37-43 The Elma Chamber of Commerce Expresses Special Tom Rose Thanks to All Those Who Helped Make This 1912 Photo of Elma from atop Strawberry Publication Possible.
  • Coastal Recovery Unit Implementation Plan for Bull Trout (Salvelinus Confluentus)

    Coastal Recovery Unit Implementation Plan for Bull Trout (Salvelinus Confluentus)

    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Coastal Recovery Unit Implementation Plan for Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) Top left: Clackamas bull trout reintroduction, Clackamas River, Oregon. David Herasimtschuk, Freshwaters Illustrated; Top, right: Glines Canyon Dam removal, Elwha River, Washington. John Gussman, Doubleclick Productions; Center: South Fork Skagit River and Skagit Bay, Washington. City of Seattle; Bottom: Riverscape surveys, East Fork Quinault River, Washington. National Park Service, Olympic National Park Coastal Recovery Unit Implementation Plan for Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) September 2015 Prepared by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Washington Fish and Wildlife Office Lacey, Washington and Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office Portland, Oregon Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................. A-1 Current Status of Bull Trout in the Coastal Recovery Unit ........................................................ A-6 Factors Affecting Bull Trout in the Coastal Recovery Unit ....................................................... A-8 Ongoing Coastal Recovery Unit Conservation Measures (Summary) ..................................... A-33 Research, Monitoring, and Evaluation ..................................................................................... A-38 Recovery Measures Narrative ................................................................................................... A-39 Implementation Schedule for
  • Seeks Input at Upcoming Public Meetings in Forks, Aberdeen and Port Angeles

    Seeks Input at Upcoming Public Meetings in Forks, Aberdeen and Port Angeles

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 19, 2019 Olympic Forest Collaborative Begins 2019 by Building on Successes - Seeks Input at Upcoming Public Meetings in Forks, Aberdeen and Port Angeles Partnership initiated by Representative Kilmer between Timber & Conservation interests has helped increase timber harvest and aquatic restoration projects on Olympic National Forest through consensus-based approach. PORT ANGELES, WA –Representative Derek Kilmer (D-WA) & The Olympic Forest Collaborative head in to 2019 with an impressive string of successful projects increasing timber harvest and aquatic restoration on Olympic National Forest. A series of public meetings in 2019 are planned to obtain community input on future projects. “Growing up in Port Angeles, I know that actively managing our federal forests is essential to supporting quality jobs in the timber industry, protecting our environment, and growing our outdoor economy,” said U.S. Representative Derek Kilmer (D-WA06) who represents the Olympic Peninsula. “That’s why we embarked on this project to bring together regional leaders to develop innovative approaches to restoring our forests and promoting increased harvest levels. The recent successes achieved by the Olympic Forest Collaborative show that we don’t have to choose between protecting our environment and creating a more vibrant economy.” Over the last three years, the Olympic Forest Collaborative has worked across the Olympic Peninsula assisting the U. S. Forest Service with preparing commercial thinning timber sales to help the Olympic National Forest meet and recently exceed their timber targets, fund habitat and aquatic restoration objectives, and host public meetings around the peninsula. In addition to assisting the Forest on projects, the Olympic Forest Collaborative has successfully developed and prepared two different pilot Habitat Restoration Thinning Stewardship projects which were sold by the Olympic National Forest.
  • Great Washington State Birding Trail  OLYMPIC LOOP

    Great Washington State Birding Trail  OLYMPIC LOOP

    OLYMPIC LOOP INDEX Sites Page Sites Page INFO KEY 1 1 Nisqually National 2 32 Morse Creek 8 Wildlife Refuge 33 Dungeness National Wildlife 2 Tumwater Historical Park Refuge 3 Capitol Lake 34 Dungeness River Audubon 4 Grass Lake Refuge Center 5 McLane Creek Nature 3 35 Dungeness Bay Trail 36 John Wayne Marina 6 Kennedy Creek 37 Jimmycomelately Creek 9 7 Friends Landing 38 Protection Island National 8 Grays Harbor National Wildlife Refuge Wildlife Refuge 39 Kah Tai Lagoon Park 9 Humptulips Estuary 4 40 Fort Worden State Park 10 Damon Point 41 Chimacum Creek Estuary 11 Ocean Shores North Jetty 42 Fort Flagler State Park 12 Point Grenville 43 Big Quilcene River 10 13 Campbell Tree Grove Estuary 14 Lake Quinault 44 Mt. Walker 15 Kalaloch Creek 5 45 Dosewallips State Park 16 4th Beach 46 Hamma Hamma Beaver Pond 17 Hoh Rainforest 47 Potlatch State Park 11 18 Anderson Homestead 48 Skokomish Delta 19 La Push 49 Twanoh State Park 20 Quillayute River Estuary 50 GeorgeAdamsSalmon 21 Lake Ozette 6 Hatchery 22 Hobuck Beach 51 Panhandle Lake 4H Camp 23 Cape Flattery 52 Oakland Bay 24 Clallam Bay Park 53 Jarrell Cove State Park 25 Pillar Point County Park 54 Theler Wetlands 12 26 Salt Creek County Park 7 27 Elwha River Estuary CREDITS 12 28 Lake Crescent 29 Whiskey Bend Trail 30 Hurricane Ridge © Ed Newbold, Tufted Puffins 31 Ediz Hook The Great Washington State Birding Trail 1 OLYMPIC LOOP INFO KEY MAp Icons LocAl SERVices And Highlights Best seasons for birding( spring, summer, fall,winter) Overall Washington: www.experiencewashington.com Olympic BirdFest: First weekend in April, Developed camping available, including restrooms; fee required.
  • Projects *Projects in Red Are Still in Progress Projects in Black Are Complete **Subcontractor

    Projects *Projects in Red Are Still in Progress Projects in Black Are Complete **Subcontractor

    Rognlin’s, Inc. Record of Construction Projects *Projects in Red are still in progress Projects in black are complete **Subcontractor % Complete Contract Contract & Job # Description/Location Amount Date Owner Architect/Engineer Class Completion of Date Work Washington Department of Fish and Washington Department of Wildlife Fish and Wildlife Log Jam Materials for East Fork $799,000.00 01/11/21 PO Box 43135 PO Box 43135 Satsop River Restoration Olympia, WA 98504 Olympia, WA 98504 Adrienne Stillerman 360.902.2617 Adrienne Stillerman 360.902.2617 WSDOT WSDOT PO Box 47360 SR 8 & SR 507 Thurston County PO Box 47360 $799,000.00 Olympia, WA 98504 Stormwater Retrofit Olympia, WA 98504 John Romero 360.570.6571 John Romero 360.570.6571 Parametrix City of Olympia 601 4th Avennue E. 1019 39th Avenue SE, Suite 100 Water Street Lift Station Generator $353,952.76 Olympia, WA 98501 Puyallup, WA 98374 Jim Rioux 360-507-6566 Kevin House 253.604.6600 WA State Department of Enterprise SCJ Alliance Services 14th Ave Tunnel – Improve 8730 Tallon Lane NE, Suite 200 20-80-167 $85,000 1500 Jefferson Street SE Pedestrian Safety Lacey, WA 98516 Olympia, WA 98501 Ross Jarvis 360-352-1465 Bob Willyerd 360.407.8497 ABAM Engineers, Inc. Port of Grays Harbor 33301 9th Ave S Suite 300 Terminals 3 & 4 Fender System PO Box 660 20-10-143 $395,118.79 12/08/2020 Federal Way, WA 98003-2600 Repair Aberdeen, WA 98520 (206) 357-5600 Mike Johnson 360.533.9528 Robert Wallace Grays Harbor County Grays Harbor County 100 W.
  • Land and Resource Management Plan

    Land and Resource Management Plan

    United States Department of Land and Resource Agriculture Forest Service Management Plan Pacific Northwest Region 1990 Olympic National Forest I,,; ;\'0:/' "\l . -'. \.. \:~JK~~'.,;"> .. ,. :~i;/i- t~:.(~#;~.. ,':!.\ ," "'~.' , .~, " ,.. LAND AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN for the OLYMPIC NATIONAL FOREST PACIFIC NORTHWEST REGION PREFACE Preparation of a Land and Resource Management Plan (Forest Plan) for the Olympic National Forest is required by the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act (RPA) as amended by the National Forest Management Act (NFMA). Regulations developed under the RPA establish a process for developing, adopting, and revising land and resource Plans for the National Forest System (36 CFR 219). The Plan has also been developed in accordance with regulations (40 CFR 1500) for implementing the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA). Because this Plan is considered a major Federal action significantly affecting the quality of the human environment, a detailed statement (environmental impact statement) has been prepared as required by NEPA. The Forest Plan represents the implementation of the Preferred Alternative as identified in the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) for the Forest Plan. If any particular provision of this Forest Plan, or application of the action to any person or circumstances is found to be invalid, the remainder of this Forest Plan and the application of that provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected. Information concerning this plan can be obtained
  • Recreation • NORTH Knowledge Our of Best the to Accurate Is Herein Presented Information All

    Recreation • NORTH Knowledge Our of Best the to Accurate Is Herein Presented Information All

    December 2008 December not responsible for any inaccuracies of map or hardship/injury due to same. same. to due hardship/injury or map of inaccuracies any for responsible not please check for current conditions before planning your trip. Map authors authors Map trip. your planning before conditions current for check please and sources as of printing date. Road conditions change periodically, so so periodically, change conditions Road date. printing of as sources and Mason County Recreation • NORTH knowledge our of best the to accurate is herein presented information All Mason County is home to a variety of outdoor recreation, thanks to our towering mountains, huge tracts of national forest, and hundreds Mason County Transit is Bicycle Friendly! of miles of salt and freshwater shoreline. A variety of bicycle routes are LEGEND highlighted with convenient map keys. Additionally, we’ve identified If roads get too busy or you grow too tired, remember that all Mason simply a matter of judgement regarding safety and passenger loads. BIKEWAYS many scenic and popular launches for kayaking, boating and fishing. For POINTS OF INTEREST County Transit buses provide bike racks. Rarely, but sometimes, you may be asked to take the next bus. If you bring your bicycle on board, please be responsible for its handling those who want to escape further into the forest, this map will show you Bike Routes Convenient, secure and easy-to-use, bicycle racks become a bicyclist’s and security in the wheelchair securement area throughout the trip. some of our favorite trails and trailheads for hiking and exploring. State Public Restroom Visitor Information Heavy Trac ? best friend when weather conditions worsen or visibility lessens due and county parks for camping or outdoor play, Mason Transit bicycle- Schedule Information • 360-426-5033 Boat Launch to darkness, mist or fog.
  • Olympic Mountains Ecological Region

    Olympic Mountains Ecological Region

    Ecological Regions: Olympic Mountains Ecological Region 5.8 Olympic Mountains Ecological Region 5.8.1 Overview The Olympic Mountains Ecological Region encompasses the northern part of the Chehalis Basin, including the Satsop and Wynoochee rivers and their tributaries (Figure 5-15). This region encompasses 496 square miles (greater than 317,000 acres) and represents approximately 18% of the overall Chehalis Basin. The Satsop and Wynoochee rivers arise in the Olympic Mountains. The highest point in this ecological region is Capitol Peak (different from the Black Hills Capitol Peak) at 5,054 feet. The Satsop River arises in three forks in distinctly different areas: the East Fork Important Features and Functions Satsop River arises in and flows through a series of • This ecological region is very productive for wetlands and lakes in the low (approximately 110 feet multiple salmonid species (steelhead and in elevation) glacial moraine deposits west of Shelton; chum, coho, and fall-run Chinook salmon) and Pacific lamprey. The East Fork Satsop the Middle Fork Satsop River arises in the southern River is particularly productive for chum hills of the Olympic Mountains at approximately and coho salmon. Native char have been 2,000 feet in elevation; and the West Fork Satsop River documented in both the Satsop and arises in the higher elevations within the Olympic Wynoochee rivers. • Glacial outwash gravel deposits with a large National Forest at Satsop Lakes near Chapel Peak at network of groundwater-fed streams in the approximately 3,000 feet in elevation. The Wynoochee East Fork Satsop River and tributaries are River arises in Olympic National Park near Wynoochee unique among all the ecological regions.
  • Development of Escapement Goals for Grays Harbor Fall Chinook Using Spawner-Recruit Models

    Development of Escapement Goals for Grays Harbor Fall Chinook Using Spawner-Recruit Models

    Development of escapement goals for Grays Harbor fall Chinook using spawner-recruit models May 2014 Quinault Department of Natural Resources (QDNR) Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW) Abstract Grays Harbor fall Chinook are currently managed for a system-total escapement goal of 14,600 naturally spawning adults (Chehalis: 12,364, Humptulips: 2,236), a goal established in 1979 based on estimates of total accessible spawning habitat and spawning habitat capacity for individual streams in the Grays Harbor Basin. Grays Harbor escapement goals have received additional attention since this capacity-based goal was developed, most recently by QDNR and WDFW in 2007 (a joint effort) and between 1999 and 2003 by the Chinook Technical Committee (CTC) of the Pacific Salmon Commission (PSC) and its Washington members. To develop an escapement goal for common use in the CTC’s review of indicator stock performance and by the Grays Harbor co-managers (QDNR and WDFW) in management, QDNR and WDFW recently conducted stock-recruitment analyses for Grays Harbor fall Chinook using updated escapement, terminal run reconstruction, and ocean abundance datasets. Goals were developed separately for each main tributary (Chehalis, Humptulips) and summed to generate an aggregate goal for the CTC Grays Harbor fall Chinook escapement indicator stock. Of three spawner-recruit functions considered (Shepherd, Beverton-Holt, Ricker), the Ricker model was identified as being the most appropriate form for both the Chehalis and Humptulips datasets. Parameter estimates indicate that the adult spawning escapement needed to produce maximum sustained yield (mean Smsy) for the Grays Harbor fall Chinook indicator stock aggregate is 13,326 (age 3+ individuals); Smsy is 9,753 for the Chehalis River and 3,573 for the Humptulips River.
  • Mason County Parks and Trails Comprehensive Plan

    Mason County Parks and Trails Comprehensive Plan

    MASON COUNTY PARKS AND TRAILS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2018 Updated from the 2013 Plan Mason County Facilities, Parks and Trails 411 North 5th Street 2100 E. Johns Prairie Road Shelton, WA 98584 Menards Landing Picnic Area ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Several people were instrumental in the development of this Parks and Recreation Comprehensive Plan. We would like to acknowledge all of those individuals who gave their time, support and assistance in developing this Comprehensive Parks Plan. COMPREHENSIVE PARK PLAN UPDATE CITIZEN ADVISORY GROUP Monte Ritter (Park Advisory Board Member) Kendy Meyers (Park Advisory Board Member) Ed Lucas Bob Simmons John Lake Greg Huffman Chad Collins Becky Penoyar Don Peppin John E. Johnson Vern Rutter Denny Hamilton Jason Maiuri Kevin Frankenberger Tom Pearson Maureen Beckstead Susan Rabago Mendy Harlow MASON COUNTY FACILITIES, PARKS AND TRAILS DEPARTMENT STAFF Frank Pinter, Support Services Director Ross McDonald, Parks Manager John Keates, Director RaeGene Churchill, Facilities Scheduler Heidi Bailey, Senior Accounting Technician Carl Olson, Maintenance II Jesse Weston, Maintenance I Joseph Glaser, Seasonal Maintenance William Ells, Maintenance I Jeff Canaday, Seasonal Maintenance MASON COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Commissioner Randy Netherlin, Chair Commissioner Kevin Shutty Commissioner Terri Drexler Prepared and updated by: Frank Pinter, Director Support Services EXECUTIVE SUMMARY he Mason County Department of Facilities, Parks and Trails acknowledges the T importance of quality of life issues, healthy lifestyles, and the need for recreational opportunities in Mason County. Because parks, trails, and other outdoor recreational facilities play an important role in increasing physical activity and promoting health, proper parks and facility planning is essential. Planning, combined with an increasing demand for recreational facilities in Mason County, dictates the need for an updated Parks and Recreation Comprehensive Plan.