Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Review the Islamic Republic

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Review the Islamic Republic UNCTAD/ITE/IPC/2005/7 United Nations Conference on Trade and Development Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Review The Islamic Republic of Iran DRAFT – UNEDITED UNITED NATIONS February 2005 PREFACE UNCTAD carries out Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Reviews, or STIPs, in order to assist interested member States in formulating policies and strengthening the role of science and technology institutions in building national productive capacity and international competitiveness. The Science, Technology and Innovation Policy Review of Iran was initiated at the request of the Iranian Ministry of Science, Research and Technology (MSRT), and undertaken in close cooperation with the United Nations University's Institute for Innovation and Technology (UNU/INTECH) in Maastricht, and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), which also financed the project. The report was prepared by a team of international experts, led by Lynn Mytelka and comprising Tirso Saenz, Svend Otto Remoe, Prasda Reddy and Fulvia Farinelli, UNCTAD project officer. An additional input was provided by Rustam Lalkaka, Mongi Hamdi and Taffere Tesfachew. Stephen Hatem provided production assistance. A preliminary draft of the report was presented at a national workshop in Tehran in November 2003, involving the international team of experts, government representatives, the business community and other stakeholders. The report and recommendations were finalized under the overall responsibility of Khalil Hamdani, UNCTAD. The national counterpart, MSRT – Deputy Minister, Dr. MiliMonfared, and in particular the Iranian Research Organization for Science and Technology (IROST), provided substantive, logistic and financial support. The background reports were prepared by a team of local experts at the MSRT, at the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Finance, Shirkavand, at the National Research Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Sanati, and at the National Petrochemical Company, Taeb. At IROST, H. Salar Amoli, H. Hajihosseini, E. Moeini, F. Abasi and Homa Sharafi provided additional inputs at various stages of the project. Ali Farzin was the counterpart in the UNDP Office in Tehran. It is hoped that the analysis and recommendations of the review will promote awareness of policy options to strengthen technological capabilities, and provide a basis for implementing an effective innovation strategy. February 2005 ii STIP Iran CONTENTS Preface......................................................................................................................ii Executive Summary.................................................................................................1 CHAPTER 1. CREATING AN INNOVATION SYSTEM ...................................7 1.1 Economic Setting ..........................................................................................7 1.1.1 Human development..............................................................................8 1.1.2 Employment ..........................................................................................9 1.1.3 GDP and Export composition..............................................................10 1.2 Technological Capacity...............................................................................14 1.2.1 University education and research.......................................................15 1.2.2 Technology infrastructure ...................................................................18 1.2.3 Technological capacity in the industrial sector ...................................18 1.3 The National System of Innovation ...........................................................20 1.3.1 Salient features of Iran's innovation system ........................................20 1.4 Assessment..................................................................................................24 CHAPTER 2. THE POLICY FRAMEWORK ......................................................26 2.1 The Iranian Policy Framework....................................................................27 2.2 The Ministry of Science, Research and Technology...................................29 2.3 The Technology Cooperation Office ..........................................................33 2.4 The Ministry of Industry and Mines ..........................................................35 2.5 The High Tech Industries Centre ................................................................37 2.6 Assessment..................................................................................................38 CHAPTER 3. DEVELOPING DOWNSTREAM CAPABILITIES IN IRAN: THE OIL, GAS AND PETROCHEMICAL SECTORS .................48 3.1 Introduction.................................................................................................48 3.2 The Post-war Reconstruction ......................................................................49 3.3 The Innovation System: Activities, Actors, Performance and Failures ......51 3.4 Innovation Dynamics in the Petrochemical Sector: the Role of Buy-back Agreements.............................................................................58 3.5 Licensing .....................................................................................................60 3.6 Incremental Innovations and Learning........................................................62 3.7 The Organization and Role of R&D in Petrochemicals..............................62 3.8 Forward Linkages and End User Industries ...............................................67 3.9 The Main Drivers of Innovation in Petroleum-Related Industries..............68 3.10 Main Findings: An Assessment of the Strengths and Weaknesses of the Petroleum Related Innovation System............................................70 3.11 Conclusions...............................................................................................71 3.12 Main Recommendations............................................................................72 iii STIP Iran CHAPTER 4. THE IRANIAN INNOVATION SYSTEM IN THE BIOPHARMACEUTICAL SECTOR............................................76 4.1 The Biopharmaceutical Innovation System: an Overview..........................76 4.2 The Demand Side: Government Policies and Their Impact on Innovation in the Pharmaceutical Industry ...........................................80 4.3 Other Ministries Influencing Demand Side Factors....................................83 4.4 The Supply Side: Actors Promoting Innovation .........................................83 4.5 Research and Innovation: Major Research and Training Centres...............90 4.6 Research and Innovation: The Role of Firms ...........................................100 4.7 Technological Capability and Innovation – An Assessment ....................102 4.8 Conclusion.................................................................................................105 4.9 Main Recommendations...........................................................................106 Tables Table 1.1 Human development indicators – historical trends.................................8 Table 1.2 Non-oil sector employment ..................................................................10 Table 1.3 Sectoral contribution to GDP ...............................................................11 Table 1.4 Sectoral contribution to GDP - comparison of Iran, the Republic of Korea and Malaysia......................................................11 Table 1.5 Net export of main petroleum products ...............................................12 Table 1.6 Knowledge and Innovation Related Indicators – Selected Countries, 2001 ....................................................................16 Table 1.7 Number of university graduates in sciences and engineering ..............17 Table 1.8 Telecom Diffusion - Iran in comparison with other oil producing countries .........................................................................18 Table 1.9 SMEs registered with the Ministry of Industry, 2002 ..........................19 Table 3.1 Petrochemical projects under the First Five Year Plan.........................50 Table 3.2 Production, export, and domestic sale of petrochemical products 1996-2001 ..............................................................................52 Table 3.3 Project areas..........................................................................................54 Table 3.4 Polymer capability ................................................................................68 Table 4.1 Data on the patent applications in Iran .................................................88 Table 4.2 Data on trademark applications ............................................................89 Boxes Box 1.1 Human Development through Innovation – The Case of Qeshm Island ..9 Box 2.1 Former Provincial Research Centres of IROST......................................29 Box 4.1 NRCGEB develops the first recombinant product in Iran: Human Growth Hormone .......................................................................93 Box 4.2 Isolation and Production of Water Absorbing Biopolymer by Biotechnology Centre .......................................................................94 Figures Figure 1.1 Oil Sector Exports: moving along the value chain..............................13 Figure 1.2 Export Portfolio of Iran .......................................................................15 Figure 1.3 National System of Innovation in Iran ................................................21
Recommended publications
  • An Overview of the Innovation System in Iran an Overview of the Innovation System in Iran
    Alireza Ansari Vaghef Prof. Dr. Utz Dornberger AN OVERVIEW OF THE FRAUNHOFER CENTERINNOVATION FOR INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENTSYSTEM AND IN KNOWLEDGE IRAN ECONOMY IMW AN OVERVIEW OF THE INNOVATION SYSTEM IN IRAN AN OVERVIEW OF THE INNOVATION SYSTEM IN IRAN Alireza Ansari Vaghef Prof. Dr. Utz Dornberger Henrik Beermann Fraunhofer Center for International Management and Knowledge Economy IMW Neumarkt 9–19, 04109 Leipzig, Germany www.imw.fraunhofer.de June 2016 FRAUNHOFER CENTER FOR INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT AND KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY IMW AN OVERVIEW OF THE INNOVATION SYSTEM IN IRAN Alireza Ansari Vaghef Prof. Dr. Utz Dornberger Henrik Beermann Contents 1 Summary 3 2 Introduction 4 3 Methodology 5 3.1 Research Design 5 3.2 Data Collection and Analysis Methods 5 3.3 Limitations 6 4 Iranian National Innovation System 7 4.1 Government 7 4.1.1 NIS Development Strategies 7 4.1.2 The Main Public Policy Actors 10 4.2 Education and Research System 13 4.2.1 Education System 13 4.2.2 Research System 16 4.3 Industry 20 4.3.1 Industrial Sectors 20 4.3.2 Industrial R&D 21 4.4 Transfer Organizations 22 4.4.1 Transfer Organization Types 23 4.4.2 The Main Transfer Organization Actors 24 5 Linkages within the National Innovation System 25 5.1 SWOT Analysis of the Iranian NIS 25 5.1.1 Strengths 26 5.1.2 Weaknesses 26 5.1.3 Opportunity 27 5.1.4 Threats 27 5.2 National Linkages 28 5.3 International Linkages 39 6 Conclusion 30 7 Reference List 31 8 Appendices 34 8.1 Abbreviations 34 8.2 List of Important Research Institutes 35 2 | 36 Fraunhofer IMW An Overview of the Innovation System in Iran 1 Summary Summary This study analyzed the four pillars of the National Innovation System (NIS) (government, education and research system, transfer organization, and industry) in Iran as well as the linkages within the system and linkages with international actors.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran-Science-And-Technology-Review-Book-Gecomprimeerd 0.Pdf
    Acknowledgement SCIENCE AND Given its mission in the field of international cooperation in science and technology and with the aim TECHNOLOGY of introducing some of the country’s technological capabilities and S & T diplomacy development, the IRAN Center for International S & T Cooperation (CISTC) has prepared the present book on Feb. 2019. It IN IRAN: contains several sections including history and background, policies and strategies, capacities and capabilities (human resources, scientific productivity, products and achievements), and authorities in A BRIEF REVIEW 2019 different technology areas. The present book is an updated version of "Science and Technology in Iran: A Brief Review" which has already been prepared on Aug. 2017. Compiled by: Iranian Technology and Innovation Development Institute Published by: Didar Parsian Publications Other contributors: • Deputy for Policy-making and Development of the Vice-Presidency for Science and Technology • Center for Progress and Development of Iran • Iran Nanotechnology Innovation Council • Biotechnology Development Council • Council for Stem Cell Sciences and Technologies • Cognitive Sciences and Technologies Council • National Council for Science & Technology Development of Medicinal & Aromatic Plants and Traditional Medicine • Digital Economy and Smart Technology Development Council • Technology Development Council of Water, Drought, Erosion & Environment • Soft Technology Development Council • Technology Development Council for Space and Advanced Transportation • Energy Technology Development Council • Pardis Technology Park • Knowledge-Based Firms Contents Iran at a Glance Cultural and Creative Industries Iran, Cradle of Civilization 8 I. History and Background 112 National Policy Documents on Science, Technology and Innovation (STI) 10 II. Objectives and Strategies 112 Main National Policies on STI 11 III. Capacities and Capabilities 113 Comprehensive Document of International Scientific Relations of IRI 12 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Iran's National ICT Education Plan: an Overview of the Possibilities, Problems and the Programs
    World Library and Information Congress: 70th IFLA General Conference and Council 22-27 August 2004 Buenos Aires, Argentina Programme: http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla70/prog04.htm Code Number: 084-E Meeting: 141. Government Information and Official Publications Simultaneous Interpretation: Yes Iran's National ICT Education Plan: an Overview of the Possibilities, Problems and the Programs Kayvan Kousha LIS Department, University of Tehran, Iran [email protected] - http://www.koosha.tripod.com Mahshid Abdoli Reference Librarian, National Library of Iran [email protected] Abstract: This paper examines the status of the first and most significant national ICT educational plan based on the recent Iran's National ICT Agenda (INICTA). The plan intends to make a significant change in direction of teaching and learning practices, especially in schools. One of the key objectives of the plan is to promote the average level of skills for using ICT in schools, universities and state organizations. The paper describes several ICT educational projects which have been initiated by Ministry of Education, Ministry of Science, Research and Technology and other organizations for development of digital and computing skills. The paper also discusses ICT opportunities and challenges for education in Iran and concludes that effective use of ICT in education seeks fundamental change and reform in the existing traditional educational systems and methods. 1. Introduction 1.1. Country Background Information Currently, with a population of 68 million and a growth rate of 1.08 percent1, and domestic production as measured by GDP of $115 billion, Iran is the second most populous country with the second-largest economy in the Middle East.
    [Show full text]
  • Islamic Republic of Iran
    ii SCIENCE, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION POLICY REVIEW - ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN NOTE The designations employed and the presentation of the material do not imply the expression of any opinion on the part of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area, or of authorities or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Material in this publication may be freely quoted or reprinted, but acknowledgement is requested, together with a copy of the publication containing the quotation or reprint to be sent to the UNCTAD secretariat. This publication has been edited externally. Symbols used in some of the tables denote the following: Two dots (..) indicate that data are not available or are not separately reported. Use of a dash (-) between dates representing years (e.g. 2008-2010) signifies the full period involved, including the beginning and end years. Reference to “dollars” ($) means United States dollars, unless otherwise indicated. Details and percentages in tables do not necessarily add to totals because of rounding. In the Islamic Republic of Iran’s national policy documents, the region includes the following countries: Afghanistan, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Egypt, Georgia, Iran (Islamic Republic of), Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kuwait, Kyrgyzstan, Lebanon, Oman, Palestine, Pakistan, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tajikistan, Turkey, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan and Yemen. UNITED NATIONS PUBLICATION UNCTAD/DTL/STICT/2016/3 Copyright © United Nations, 2016 All rights reserved. Printed in Switzerland. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The STIP Review of the Islamic Republic of Iran was prepared under the supervision of Angel Gonzalez Sanz, Head of the Science, Technology and ICT Branch (UNCTAD).
    [Show full text]
  • Cno-Iran.Pdf
    NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTEREY, CALIFORNIA THESIS DEVELOPING A RELIABLE METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSING THE COMPUTER NETWORK OPERATIONS THREAT OF IRAN by Jason P. Patterson Matthew N. Smith September 2005 Thesis Advisor: Dorothy Denning Second Reader: James Ehlert Approved for release; distribution is unlimited THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE Form Approved OMB No. 0704-0188 Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instruction, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information, including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302, and to the Office of Management and Budget, Paperwork Reduction Project (0704-0188) Washington DC 20503. 1. AGENCY USE ONLY (Leave blank) 2. REPORT DATE 3. REPORT TYPE AND DATES COVERED September 2005 Master’s Thesis 4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE: Developing A Reliable Methodology for 5. FUNDING NUMBERS Assessing the Computer Network Operations Threat of Iran 6. AUTHOR(S) Jason Patterson Matthew N. Smith 7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 8. PERFORMING Naval Postgraduate School ORGANIZATION REPORT Monterey, CA 93943-5000 NUMBER 9. SPONSORING /MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSORING/MONITORING N/A AGENCY REPORT NUMBER 11. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES The views expressed in this thesis are those of the author and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Department of Defense or the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Transfer of Technology from Iranian Universities to Industry: University Perspective
    Transfer of Technology from Iranian Universities to Industry: University Perspective University in regional innovation and social development University technology transfer Uma Kumar Sprott School of Business Carleton University Ottawa, Canada [email protected] Omid Ali Kharazmi Stirling Management School University of Stirling Stirling, UK [email protected] ABSTRACT This is a study about transferring technology from Iranian universities to Iranian industry. The relationship between universities and industry is much weaker in Iran than it is in developed countries. Most of the Iranian universities have used the model of western universities, but this model does not seem to be able to solve the problems of Iranian industry. The connection between universities and industry in Iran is, therefore, not strong because industry cannot satisfy all of its needs through collaboration with universities. The study examines the existing technology transfer process from university to industry, the organizations involved, and the major decisions taken during technology transfer. In addition, the study uncovers the barriers for transferring the technology, examines different ways of establishing contacts, and considers the benefits gained from university-industry collaboration. To achieve these objectives, we conducted 31 interviews. The interviews revealed that companies were more proactive in establishing contacts with universities; in most situations they initiated contacts with the professors. However, the professor‟s expertise, reputation, and ability to establish friendly relations with people from industry helped make these contacts successful. Professors measured the success of these transactions by the level of satisfaction the firm expressed with the technology. University liaison officers, most of whom initially had a reactive posture toward 1 establishing these contacts, measured the success of these transactions by the amount of financial returns for the university.
    [Show full text]