DOCSLIB.ORG

First Results of the Demographic Data Collection for 2002 in Europe : 20/2003

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
First Results of the Demographic Data Collection for 2002 in Europe : 20/2003 First results of the ^κ. ^ ^áp ρ A demographic data collection 1953 — ■¿Γ 2CKJ3 for 2002 in Europe eurostat Joint Council of Europe/Eurostat demographic data collection The objective of this publication is to provide some basic demographic information for 2002. However, given the timetable (rapid questionnaire sent out in April 2003 with a return date of May), not all countries could provide all the information while some figures are provisional or estimates. Additional and/or more definitive information will in focus be published in the annual reports of the Council of Europe (« Recent demographic developments in Europe 2003 ») and Eurostat (« European social statistics - Population 2003 »). POPULATION AND Main demographic trends for 2002 SOCIAL CONDITIONS The population of the European Union is estimated to have increased by 0.3% in 2002, compared with 0.4% in 2001. Some three quarters of the 1.3 million increase in 2002, to 379 million at 1.1.2003, was due to net inward international migration (1 million) and THEME 3 - 20/2003 one quarter to natural increase (0.3 million). The largest percentage increase in 2002 was seen in Ireland at 1.5% and the lowest in Germany and Italy at 0.1%. Annual population decreases were again observed in many central and eastern European POPULATION AND LIVING countries, such as Bulgaria and Latvia (-0.6%) and Belarus (-0.5%). More detailed CONDITIONS results are shown in Tables 1 and 2. It may also be noted from Table 1 that there are revisions to the population estimates for several countries for 1.1.2002, published, for example, in the corresponding Contents Statistics in focusTor 2002 (17/2002). The revision is the effect of countries re-basing their population estimates on new information following the 2000 round of censuses, Joint Council of (this is a well-established practice usually made necessary by the imprecision of Europe/Eurostat demographic international migration estimates). Thus the current estimate for the European Union of data collection 1 377.7 million at 1.1 2002 is some 2 million lower than the estimate that was published last year. The most significant revisions have been a reduction in the population Main demographic trends for estimate of well over 1 million for both Italy and the United Kingdom, and some 100 2002 1 thousand for Austria. In contrast, the estimate for Greece has been increased by about 400 thousand. Revisions to the population estimates for France, Portugal and Spain were incorporated in last year's report (17/2002). Table 3 shows that yet again the total fertility rate (TFR) in the EU in 2002, at 1.47 has remained virtually unchanged from 2001 and 2000. However there were some notable increases, in Germany up from 1.35 in 2001 to 1.40 in 2002, and in Sweden, up from 1.57 to 1.65. The TFR for Ireland at just over 2.0 was only slightly below the rate for the United States, and helps to account for the relatively high rate of population increase. The proportion of births outside marriage continues to show small increases in all countries, both in the European Union and other Council of Europe member states. Over 50% of births were outside marriage in many parts of northern Europe - in Iceland (62.3%), Estonia (56.3%), Sweden (56.0%) and for the first time, Norway at 50.3%. Even in Malta there has been a significant increase, from 12.9% in 2001 to 15.0% in 2002, compared with just 5.8% in 1996. The most significant new feature in Table 4 is the low infant mortality rate in Sweden at less than 3 deaths of children under one per 1000 live births. This is about half the rate of many other EU countries. The infant mortality rate for the EU as a whole has continued to fall; at 4.5 in 2002, it is still 50% lower than in the United States (6.9). The downward trend in the number of marriages continues with the number of Manuscript completed on: 6.07.2003 marriages in the EU falling from 1.9 million in 2000 to about 1.8 million in 2001 and ISSN 1024-4352 2002, despite small increases for both Sweden and Austria (see Table 5). The overall Catalogue number KS-NK-03-020-EN-C trend in the number of divorces is in the opposite direction, with an increase of about © European Communities, 2003 10 thousand for the EU as a whole between 2000 and 2001. Figure 1: World population, 2003 Figure 3: Components of population change, 2002 (per 1000 population) Other Council of Europe Countriea 6.88% 20 USA, Japan t other 15 mora developpöd countrlee 10 7.47% 5 0 y ι π o ­5 ­10 -15 -20 FIN UK Figure 2: Share of the world's population increase, 2002 Other Council of USA, Japan h, other Europa countrlee ­0.36% mora developped countrlee 4­46% ALB AND ARM AZE BGR HRV CYP CZE EST GEO HUN »L LVA UE LTU MLT MDA NOR POL ROM RUS SMR SVK SVN CHE MKD TUR UKR BLR YUG 1WS: ALB; 2000: SEO; 2001; AND, HRV, RUS, SMR, MKD, UKR ■ Natural increase ] Net migration GLOSSARY Natural increase: the difference between the number of live births and the number of deaths. Net migration: the difference between the number of immigrants and the number of emigrants. In this publication, it is calculated by taking the difference between total population increase and natural increase. Crude rate: the ratio of the number of events to the mean population in a given year. Total fertility rate: the average number of children that would be born alive to a woman during her lifetime if current age specific fertility rates were to continue. Infant mortality rate: the ratio of deaths of children under one year of age to the live births in a given year. Life expectancy at birth: the average number of years a person would live if current age specific mortality rates were to continue. Council of Europe Member States: all the European Union countries, Andorra (AND), Albania (ALB), Armenia (ARM), Azerbaijan (AZE), Bosnia and Herzegovina (BIH), Bulgaria (BGR), Croatia (HRV), Cyprus (CYP), Czech Republic (CZE), Estonia (EST), Georgia (GEO), Hungary (HUN), Iceland (ISL), Latvia (LVA), Liechtenstein (LIE), Lithuania (LTU), Malta (MLT), Moldova (MDA), Norway (NOR), Poland (POL), Romania (ROM), Russian Federation (RUS), San Marino (SMR), Slovak Republic (SVK), Slovenia (SVN), Switzerland (CHE), "The former Yug. Rep. of Macedonia" (MKD), Turkey (TUR), Ukraine (UKR). Council of Europe non-Member States: Belarus (BLR), Serbia and Montenegro (YUG). More developed countries: all countries in Europe (including European members of the CIS-Commonwealth of Independent States), Australia, Canada, Japan, New Zealand, Turkey, the United States of America. Less developed countries: all countries excluding more developed countries. Statistics in focus — Theme 3 — 20/2003 ■ eurostat Table 1 : Population change in 2002 Population Live Deaths Natural Net Total Population COUNTRY/REGION 1.1.2002 births increase migration increase 1.1.2003 (1000) European Union 377 698.1 * 3 995.0 ' 3 693.7 * 301.3* 988.6' 1 290.0 * 378 988.1 * Eurozone 304 499.1 ,B 3 166.3 ' 2 932.0 ' 234.3* 844.2' 1 078.4 * 305 577.5 * Belgium 10 309.7 113.6 p 106.4 p 7.2 p 38.9 p 46.1 p 10 355.8 p Denmark 5 368.4 64.1 58.6 5.5 9.6 15.2 5 383.5 Germany 82 440.3 p 725.0 p 845.0 p -120.0 p 221.7' 101.7' 82 542.0 ' Greece 10 988.0 5p 102.5 ' 104.2 ' -1.7' 32.1 ' 30.4 p 11 018.4 p Spain 40 409.3 411.5* 365.8 ' 45.8' 227.9 " 273.7 40 683.0 France 59 337.9 p 762.7 p 539.7 p 223.0 p 65.0 p 288.0 p 59 625.9 p Ireland 3 901.4 5' 60.5 p 29.4 p 31.1 p 28.8' 59.9' 3 961.3' Italy 56 993.7 5" 533.6 " 562.7 ' -29.1 ' 107.1 ' 78.0' 57 071.7 ' Luxembourg 444.1 5.3 3.7 1.6 2.6 4.3 448.3 Netherlands 16 105.3 203.1 p 143.3 p 59.9 p 27.7 p 87.6 p 16 192.8 p Austria 8 038.9 5" 78.4 76.1 2.3 17.0 e 19.3 e 8 058.2 e Portugal 10 335.6 114.4 p 106.2 p 8.1 p 70.0' 78.1 ' 10413.7 ' Finland 5 194.9 55.6 49.4 6.1 5.3 11.4 5 206.3 Sweden 8 909.1 95.8 95.0 0.8 30.9 31.7 8 940.8 United Kingdom 58 921.5 5' 668.8 p 608.0 p 60.7 p 104.0' 164.7 ' 59 086.3 ' Other Council of Europe Member States Albania 3 401.2 2 57.5 3 16.7 3 40.8 3 Andorra 66.3 0.8 1 0.2 1 0.5 1 0.0 1 0.5 1 Armenia 3 212.9 32.2 25.6 6.7 -9.3 -2.6 3 210.3 Azerbaijan 8 141.4 110.7 46.5 64.2 -3.1 61.1 8 202.5 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3 832.0 4' 35.1 p 29.3 p 5.9 p Bulgaria 7 891.1 5p 67.3 p 112.9 p -45.6 p 0.0 p -45.6 p 7 845.5 p Croatia 4 437.5 1 41.0 1 49.6 1 -8.6 1 23.4 1e 14.8 1e 4 452.3 2e Cyprus 793.1 5" 8.9' 5.7' 3.2" 8.4' 11.6" 804.7 ' Czech Republic 10 206.4 5 92.8 108.2 -15.5 12.3 -3.2 10 203.3 Estonia 1 361.2 6 13.0 18.4 -5.4 0.2 -5.2 1 356.0 Georgia 3 947.6 1 40.4 1 38.6 1 1.8 1 Hungary 10 174.9 96.8 132.8 -36.0 13.2 -22.9 10 152.0 Iceland 286.6 4.0 p 1.8 p 2.2 p -0.3 p 1.9 288.5 Latvia 2 345.8 20.0 32.5 -12.5 -1.8 -14.3 2 331.5 Liechtenstein 33.5 p 0.4 p 0.2 p 0.2 p 0.2 p 0.4 p 33.9 p Lithuania 3 475.6 5 30.0 p 41.1 p -11.1 p -2.0 p -13.0 p 3 462.6 p Malta 394.6 3.8 3.0 0.8 1.9 2.7 397.3 Moldova 3 627.2 35.7 41.9 -6.1 -3.4 -9.5 3 617.7 Norway 4 524.1 55.4 44.7 p 10.7 p 17.5 p 28.2 4 552.3 Poland 38 236.9 6p 353.8 359.5 -5.7 -17.2 p -22.9 p 38 214.0 p Romania 21 872.3 5p 210.5 269.7 -59.1 -1.6° -60.7 p 21 811.6 p Russian Federation 143 954.4 1 396.8 p 2 331.4 p -934.6 p San Marino 28.2 0.3 1 0.2 ' 0.1 1 1.1 ' 1.2 1 Slovak Republic 5 379.0 50.8 51.5 -0.7 0.9 0.2 5 379.2 p Slovenia 1 994.0 17.5 p 18.6 p -1.1 p 2.1 1.0 1 995.0 Switzerland 7 261.2 72.4 p 61.8 p 10.6 p 49.1 p 59.7 p 7 320.9 p "The former Yug.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • International Terrorism and Europe
    Chaillot Papers December 2002 n°56 International terrorism and Europe Thérèse Delpech In January 2002 the Institute for Security Studies (ISS) beca- me an autonomous Paris-based agency of the European Union. Following an EU Council Joint Action of 20 July 2001, it is now an integral part of the new structures that will support the further development of the CFSP/ESDP. The Institute’s core mission is to provide analyses and recommendations that can be of use and relevance to the formulation of EU policies. In carrying out that mission, it also acts as an interface between experts and decision-makers at all levels. The EUISS is the successor to the WEU Institute for Security Studies, set up in 1990 by the WEU Council to foster and sti- mulate a wider discussion of security issues across Europe. Chaillot Papers are monographs on topical questions written either by a member of the ISS research team or by outside authors chosen and commissioned by the Institute. Early drafts are normally discussed at a semi- nar or study group of experts convened by the Institute and publication indicates that the paper is considered by the ISS as a useful and authoritative contribution to the debate on CFSP/ESDP. Responsibility for the views expressed in them lies exclusively with authors. Chaillot Papers are also accessible via the Institute’s Website: www.iss-eu.org Chaillot Papers December 2002 n°56 The original French version is also available International terrorism and Europe Thérèse Delpech Institute for Security Studies European Union Paris The author Thérèse Delpech is Director for Strategic Affairs at France’s Commissariat à l’Energie atomique, Commissioner at UNMOVIC (UN Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission for Iraq) and associate researcher at the Centre d’Etudes et de Recherches internationales (CERI).
    [Show full text]
  • CRP 8 Poland
    Convention on the Protection and Use of Transboundary Watercourses and International Lakes Seminar on flood prevention, protection and mitigation (Berlin, 21-22 June 2004) Conference room paper MP.WAT/SEM.3/CRP. 8 FLOODS IN EUROPE Discussion paper transmitted by the Government of Poland 1 (Prepared by Mr. Piotr Kowalczak, Institute of Meteorology and Water Management) 1 This discussion paper has been reproduced in the form in which it was received by the secretariat. CRP.8 Page 2 Natural disasters are unpreventable phenomena, as man can not shape their magnitude or time of occurrence. It is only possible to decrease the losses inflicted by the occurrence of phenomena causing such catastrophe events, or reduce the likelihood of arising a new natural disaster being an effect of another natural disaster, happening before. Among natural disasters occurring in Europe, special place is occupied by floods which on our continent have appeared with exceptional intensity, particularly in the last decade. Strong winds, droughts and earthquakes with centre of occurrence in the south-eastern part of the continent, are equally threatening and frequently occurring natural catastrophes. The flood occurrence intensity on continents and losses caused by floods are presented in the table below. Table 1. Flood occurrence according to continents from 1900 – 2004 # of Total Losses Event Killed Injured Homeless Affected affected (000 USD) s 434 18,580 22,635 4,385,041 32,119,915 36,527,591 3,385,483 Africa 43* 52* 10,104* 74,009* 84,165* 7,801* 665 96,352 40,572
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Observed Changes and Responses in Natural and Managed Systems
    1 Assessment of observed changes and responses in natural and managed systems Coordinating Lead Authors: Cynthia Rosenzweig (USA), Gino Casassa (Chile) Lead Authors: David J. Karoly (USA/Australia), Anton Imeson (The Netherlands), Chunzhen Liu (China), Annette Menzel (Germany), Samuel Rawlins (Trinidad and Tobago), Terry L. Root (USA), Bernard Seguin (France), Piotr Tryjanowski (Poland) Contributing Authors: Tarekegn Abeku (Ethiopia), Isabelle Côté (Canada), Mark Dyurgerov (USA), Martin Edwards (UK), Kristie L. Ebi (USA), Nicole Estrella (Germany), Donald L. Forbes (Canada), Bernard Francou (France), Andrew Githeko (Kenya), Vivien Gornitz (USA), Wilfried Haeberli (Switzerland), John Hay (New Zealand), Anne Henshaw (USA), Terrence Hughes (Australia), Ana Iglesias (Spain), Georg Kaser (Austria), R. Sari Kovats (UK), Joseph Lam (China), Diana Liverman (UK), Dena P. MacMynowski (USA), Patricia Morellato (Brazil), Jeff T. Price (USA), Robert Muir-Wood (UK), Peter Neofotis (USA), Catherine O’Reilly (USA), Xavier Rodo (Spain), Tim Sparks (UK), Thomas Spencer (UK), David Viner (UK), Marta Vicarelli (Italy), Ellen Wiegandt (Switzerland), Qigang Wu (China), Ma Zhuguo (China) Review Editors: Lucka Kajfež-Bogataj (Slovenia), Jan Pretel (Czech Republic), Andrew Watkinson (UK) This chapter should be cited as: Rosenzweig, C., G. Casassa, D.J. Karoly, A. Imeson, C. Liu, A. Menzel, S. Rawlins, T.L. Root, B. Seguin, P. Tryjanowski, 2007: Assess- ment of observed changes and responses in natural and managed systems. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, M.L. Parry, O.F. Canziani, J.P. Palutikof, P.J. van der Linden and C.E. Hanson, Eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 79-131.
    [Show full text]
  • Fatherhood and Health Outcomes in Europe FATHERS GENDER IDENTITY HEALTH PARENTING CHILD WELFARE MATERNAL WELFARE FATHER-CHILD RELATIONS EUROPE
    Fatherhood and Health outcomes in Europe FATHERS GENDER IDENTITY HEALTH PARENTING CHILD WELFARE MATERNAL WELFARE FATHER-CHILD RELATIONS EUROPE Address requests about publications of the WHO Regional Office for Europe to: Publications WHO Regional Office for Europe Scherfigsvej 8 DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Alternatively, complete an online request form for documentation, health information, or for permission to quote or translate, on the Regional Office web site (http://www.euro.who.int/pubrequest). © World Health Organization 2007 All rights reserved. The Regional Office for Europe of the World Health Organization welcomes requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications, in part or in full. The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. All reasonable precautions have been taken by the World Health Organization to verify the information contained in this publication. However, the published material is being distributed without warranty of any kind, either express or implied.
    [Show full text]
  • Transborder State Reterritorialization in Eastern Europe: the Lower Danube Euroregion Gabriel Popescu
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2006 Transborder State Reterritorialization in Eastern Europe: The Lower Danube Euroregion Gabriel Popescu Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES TRANSBORDER STATE RETERRITORIALIZATION IN EASTERN EUROPE: THE LOWER DANUBE EUROREGION By GABRIEL POPESCU A Dissertation submitted to the Department of Geography in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Summer Semester, 2006 Copyright @ 2006 Gabriel Popescu All Rights Reserved The members of the Committee approve the Dissertation of Gabriel Popescu defended on 04.28.2006. __________________________ Jonathan Leib Professor Directing Dissertation __________________________ Dale Smith Outside Committee Member __________________________ Barney Warf Committee Member __________________________ Patrick O’Sullivan Committee Member The Office of Graduate Studies has verified and approved the above named committee members. ii To my parents iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank Jonathan Leib for his valuable guidance and encouragement during my academic career at Florida State University and for his unwavering support and critical insight throughout this research. I am grateful to Barney Warf for providing inspiration for my academic career as well as generous assistance in my research. I would like to extend my thanks to committee members Patrick O’Sullivan and Dale Smith for helping me with this dissertation. I am especially grateful to my contacts in Romania, Ukraine, and Moldova who provided me crucial information and personal insights that informed this research. This research was supported in part by the following grants and awards: Association of American Geographers, Political Geography Specialty Group, Dissertation Enhancement Award.
    [Show full text]
  • Non-Wood Forest Products in Europe
    Forest Policy and Economics 116 (2020) 102175 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Forest Policy and Economics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/forpol Non-wood forest products in Europe – A quantitative overview T ⁎ Marko Lovrića, , Riccardo Da Reb, Enrico Vidaleb, Irina Prokofievac, Jennifer Wongd, Davide Pettenellab, Pieter Johannes Verkerka, Robert Mavsara a European Forest Institute, Yliopistokatu 6B, 80100 Joensuu, Finland b University of Padua, Department of Land, Environment, Agriculture and Forestry TESAF, Viale dell'Università, 16, 35020 Legnaro, Italy c Forest Sciences Center of Catalonia, Carrer de Sant Llorenç, 0, 25280 Solsona, Lleida, Spain d Wild Resources Ltd, Ynys Uchaf, Mynydd Llandygai, Bangor, Gwynedd LL57 4BZ, UK ABSTRACT Mushrooms, berries and other Non-Wood Forest Products (NWFPs) are an important part of forest recreation, rural income and of cultural heritage. Due to poor data on their collection and use, they are often ignored in forest policy and management decisions, which could impair those livelihoods that depend on NWFPs as an income source. We conducted a survey involving 17,346 respondents from 28 European countries to estimate which and how much of these products are collected. Our results show that 26% of European households collect NWFPs and that collection rates and quantities increase from Western to Eastern Europe. Previous studies focused mainly on marketed NWFPs, but our findings suggest that marketed NWFPs represent only a small share and that 86% of the collected weight is self- consumed. The total value of NWFPs collected each year amounts to 71% of the value of annual roundwood production, much more than previously estimated. Our results point to the need to consider co-production of wood and NWFPs, especially in Central Europe where their value per hectare is the highest.
    [Show full text]
  • Health Technology Assessment: an Introduction to Objectives, Role of Evidence, and Structure in Europe
    for ent d the Policy brief Health technology assessment An introduction to objectives, role of evidence, and structure in Europe by Marcial Velasco-Garrido Reinhard Busse The European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies is a partnership between the World Health Organization Regional Office Observatory is a partnership the World European between The and Policies on Health Systems Investm the European Region of Italy, the Veneto Spain and Sweden, Greece, Norway, of Belgium, Finland, the Governments Europe, Bank, the Open Society Institute, the World Bank, CRP-Santé Luxembourg, the London School of Economics and Political Science an and Political the London School of Economics Luxembourg, Bank, CRP-Santé Bank, the Open Society Institute, the World Medicine. London School of Hygiene & Tropical This policy brief is intended for policy-makers and those addressing the issue of health technology assessment. policy brief is intended for policy-makers This European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Policy brief © World Health Organization 2005, Health technology assessment on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems An introduction to objectives, role of evidence, and Policies and structure in Europe All rights reserved. The European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies welcomes requests for permission to reproduce or translate Health systems have developed at different speeds, and with differing degrees its publications, in part or in full of complexity throughout the twentieth century, reflecting the diverse political (see address on inside back cover). and social conditions in each country. Notwithstanding their diversity, all systems, however, share a common reason for their existence, namely the improvement of health for their entire popula- tions.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf, 749.5 Kb
    European on Health Systems and Policies TACKLING CHRONIC DISEASE IN EUROPE Strategies, interventions and challenges Reinhard Busse, Miriam Blümel, David Scheller-Kreinsen, Annette Zentner Observatory Studies Series No 20 Tackling chronic disease in Europe The European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies supports and promotes evidence- based health policy-making through comprehensive and rigorous analysis of health systems in Europe. It brings together a wide range of policy-makers, academics and practitioners to analyse trends in health reform, drawing on experience from across Europe to illuminate policy issues. The European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies is a partnership between the World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe, the Governments of Belgium, Finland, Norway, Slovenia, Spain and Sweden, the Veneto Region of Italy, the European Investment Bank, the World Bank, the London School of Economics and Political Science and the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. Tackling chronic disease in Europe Strategies, interventions and challenges Reinhard Busse Miriam Blümel David Scheller-Kreinsen Annette Zentner Keywords: CHRONIC DISEASE – prevention and control – economics COST OF ILLNESS COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS STRATEGIC PLANNING DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE, INTEGRATED EUROPE © World Health Organization 2010, on behalf of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies All rights reserved. The European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies welcomes requests for permission to reproduce or translate its publications, in part or in full. Address requests about publications to: Publications, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Scherfigsvej 8, DK-2100 Copenhagen Ø, Denmark Alternatively, complete an online request form for documentation, health information, or for permission to quote or translate, on the Regional Office web site (http://www.euro.who.int/pubrequest).
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Volunteering in the European Union Final Report
    VOLUNTEERING IN THE EUROPEAN UNION Educational, Audiovisual & Culture Executive Agency (EAC-EA) Directorate General Education and Culture (DG EAC) Final Report submitted by GHK 17 February 2010 Contact person: Cecile Mathou, email: [email protected] GHK, Rue Royale 146, 1000 Brussels, Tel: +32 2 2750100 Contractual address 526 Fulham Road, London SW6 5NR Tel: +44 20 7471 8000; Fax: +44 20 7736 0784 www.ghkint.com Study on Volunteering in the European Union Final Report Study on Volunteering in the European Union Final Report CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ 6 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 21 1.1 Background to the study....................................................................................................... 21 1.1.1 Volunteering at international level ..................................................................................... 21 1.1.2 Volunteering and EU policies, programmes and activities................................................ 25 1.2 Aims of the assignment ........................................................................................................ 38 2 METHOD OF APPROACH ..................................................................................................... 39 2.1 Outline of the method used for undertaking the study ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Expanding Borders: New Challenges for Wildlife Trade Controls in the European Union
    EXPANDING BORDERS: NEW CHALLENGES FOR WILDLIFE TRADE CONTROLS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION STEPHANIE THEILE, ATTILA STEINER AND KATALIN KECSE-NAGY A TRAFFIC EUROPE REPORT Published by TRAFFIC Europe, Brussels, Belgium. © 2004 TRAFFIC Europe All rights reserved. All material appearing in this publication is copyrighted and may be reproduced with permission. Any reproduction in full or in part of this publication must credit TRAFFIC Europe as the copyright owner. The views of the author expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect those of the TRAFFIC network, WWF or IUCN. The designation of geographical entities in this publication, and the presentation of the material, do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of TRAFFIC or its supporting organizations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, or area, or its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The TRAFFIC symbol copyright and Registered Trademark ownership is held by WWF. TRAFFIC is a joint programme of WWF and IUCN. Suggested citation: Theile, S., Steiner, A. and Kecse- Nagy, K. (2004). Expanding borders: New challenges for wildlife trade controls in the European Union. TRAFFIC Europe, Brussels, Belgium. Printed on recycled paper. EXPANDING BORDERS: NEW CHALLENGES FOR WILDLIFE TRADE CONTROLS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION by Stephanie Theile, Attila Steiner and Katalin Kecse-Nagy CONTENTS Acknowledgements ii Executive summary iii Introduction 1 Wildlife trade regulation in the European Union 2 Main differences between
    [Show full text]
  • 2Demography, Households
    Overview of the social situation in the European Union Section 1 The social situation in the European Union 2004 1 Section 1 Overview of the social situation in the European Union ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS DG Employment and Social Affairs and Eurostat would like to thank all those who have contributed to this report. In particular the European Foundation on Living and Working Conditions, Professor Géry Coomans of ISMEA; Professor Dr M.Harvey Brenner of the Berlin University of Technology; Professor Yannis Yfantopoulos of the University of Athens and Professor Christian Haerpfer and Dr. Claire Wallace of the Institute for Advanced Studies Vienna. 2 Overview of the social situation in the European Union Section 1 Foreword The Social Situation Report – published annually since 2000 – provides a prospective overview of the social dimension in the European Union as a background to social policy development and contributes to the monitoring of developments in the social field across Member States. Furthermore, it establishes links to other Commission publications such as Employment in Europe, Industrial Relations in Europe and the Gender Equality Report. One special characteristic of this report is that it combines harmonised quantitative information with survey data on public opinion. In this way it acts as a reference document, with the perceptions and attitudes of people living in Europe added to the overall portrait of the social situation. This year the report seeks to portray the social dimension of the enlarged Union, looking at both developing
    [Show full text]
  • Entrepreneurship Education in Europe
    CHAPTER FIVE – 1 Chapter 5 Entrepreneurship Education in Europe by Karen Wilson European Foundation for Entrepreneurship Research This chapter assesses the state of entrepreneurship education in higher education institutions (HEIs) in Europe, comparing it to developments in the United States and outlining a set of recommendations for universities and policy makers. Comparisons include the differences in definition between entrepreneurship and SMEs, multidisciplinary learning, academic and business links, quality entrepreneurship curricula, and the role of entrepreneurship within the university. Europe has the opportunity to learn from models around the world and focus on integrating the most relevant and high-quality practices into higher education institutions. Europe’s competitiveness, innovation and economic growth depend on being able to produce future leaders with the skills and attitudes to be entrepreneurial in their professional lives, whether by creating their own companies or innovating in larger organisations. Entrepreneurship education is the first and arguably the most important step for embedding an innovative culture in Europe. ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND HIGHER EDUCATION – ISBN- 9789264044098 © OECD 2008 2 – CHAPTER FIVE Introduction Can entrepreneurship be taught? It’s an age-old debate. The answer is both yes and no. Education plays an essential role in shaping attitudes, skills and culture – from the primary level up. Entrepreneurship education provides a mix of experiential learning, skill building and, most importantly, mindset shift. Certainly the earlier and more widespread the exposure to entrepreneurship and innovation, the more likely it is that students will consider entrepreneurial careers at some point in the future. What do we mean by entrepreneurship? There are many working definitions but for the purposes of this chapter, entrepreneurship is defined as “the pursuit of opportunities beyond the resources you currently control” (Stevenson, 1983, 1985; Stevenson and Jarillo, 1991).
    [Show full text]