Major Applications Planning Committee 73 - 118

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Major Applications Planning Committee 73 - 118 Public Document Pack Major Applications To Councillors on the Committee Planning Councillor Edward Lavery (Chairman) Councillor Ian Edwards (Vice-Chairman) Committee Councillor Jazz Dhillon Councillor Janet Duncan Date: WEDNESDAY 15 NOVEMBER 2017 Councillor Henry Higgins Councillor John Morgan Time: 6.00 PM Councillor John Oswell Councillor Brian Stead Venue: COMMITTEE ROOM 5 - CIVIC CENTRE, HIGH Councillor David Yarrow STREET, UXBRIDGE UB8 1UW Meeting Members of the Public and Details: Press are welcome to attend this meeting Published: Tuesday 7 November 2017 Contact: Anisha Teji Tel: 01895 277655 Email: [email protected] This Agenda is available online at: http://modgov.hillingdon.gov.uk/ieListMeetings.aspx?CId=325&Year=0 Putting our residents first Lloyd White Head of Democratic Services London Borough of Hillingdon, Phase II, Civic Centre, High Street, Uxbridge, UB8 1UW www.hillingdon.gov.uk Useful information for residents and visitors Watching & recording this meeting You can watch the public (Part 1) part of this meeting on the Council's YouTube channel, live or archived after the meeting. Residents and the media are also welcome to attend in person, and if they wish, report on the public part of the meeting. Any individual or organisation may record or film proceedings as long as it does not disrupt proceedings. It is recommended to give advance notice of filming to ensure any particular requirements can be met. The Council will provide seating areas for residents/public, high speed WiFi access to all attending and an area for the media to report. The officer shown on the front of this agenda should be contacted for further information and will be available to assist. When present in the room, silent mode should be enabled for all mobile devices. Travel and parking Bus routes 427, U1, U3, U4 and U7 all stop at the Civic Centre. Uxbridge underground station, with the Piccadilly and Metropolitan lines, is a short walk away. Limited parking is available at the Civic Centre. For details on availability and how to book a parking space, please contact Democratic Services. Please enter from the Council’s main reception where you will be directed to the Committee Room. Accessibility For accessibility options regarding this agenda please contact Democratic Services. For those hard of hearing an Induction Loop System is available for use. Emergency procedures If there is a FIRE, you will hear a continuous alarm. Please follow the signs to the nearest FIRE EXIT and assemble on the Civic Centre forecourt. Lifts must not be used unless instructed by a Fire Marshal or Security Officer. In the event of a SECURITY INCIDENT, follow instructions issued via the tannoy, a Fire Marshal or a Security Officer. Those unable to evacuate using the stairs, should make their way to the signed refuge locations. A useful guide for those attending Planning Committee meetings Security and Safety information petition organiser or of the agent/applicant; Fire Alarm - If there is a FIRE in the building the 5. The Committee debate the item and may seek fire alarm will sound continuously. If there is a clarification from officers; SECURITY INCIDENT follow the instructions issued 6. The Committee will vote on the via the tannoy, a Fire Marshall or a Security recommendation in the report, or on an Officer. alternative recommendation put forward by a Member of the Committee, which has been seconded. Mobile telephones – Please switch off any mobile telephones before the meeting . About the Committee’s decision The Committee must make its decisions by Petitions and Councillo rs having regard to legislation, policies laid down Petitions – Those who have organised a petition of by National Government, by the Greater London 20 or more people who live, work or study in the Authority – under ‘The London Plan’ and borough, can speak at a Planning Committee in Hillingdon’s own planning policies as contained support of or against an application. Petitions in the ‘Unitary Development Plan 1998’ and must be submitted in writing to the Council in supporting guidance. The Committee must also advance of the meeting. Where there is a make its decision based on material planning petition opposing a planning application there is considerations and case law and material also the right for the applicant or their agent to presented to it at the meeting in the officer’s address the meeting for up to 5 minutes. report and any representations received. Ward Councillors – There is a right for local Guidance on how Members of the Committee councillors to speak at Planning Committees about must conduct themselves when dealing with applications in their Ward. planning matters and when making their Committee Members – The planning committee is decisions is contained in the ‘Planning Code of made up of the experienced Councillors who meet Conduct’, which is part of the Council’s in public every three weeks to make decisions on Constitution. applications. When making their decision, the Committee How the Committee meeting works cannot take into account issues which are not planning considerations such a the effect of a The Planning Committees consider the most development upon the value of surrounding complex and controversial proposals for properties, nor the loss of a view (which in itself development or enforcement action. is not sufficient ground for refusal of Applications for smaller developments such as permission), nor a subjective opinion relating to householder extensions are generally dealt with the design of the property. When making a by the Council’s planning officers under delegated decision to refuse an application, the Committee powers. will be asked to provide detailed reasons for An agenda is prepared for each meeting, which refusal based on material planning comprises reports on each application considerations. Reports with petitions will normally be taken at If a decision is made to refuse an application, the beginning of the meeting. the applicant has the right of appeal against the decision. A Planning Inspector appointed by the The procedure will be as follows:- Government will then consider the appeal. 1. The Chairman will announce the report; There is no third party right of appeal, although 2. The Planning Officer will introduce it; with a a third party can apply to the High Court for presentation of plans and photographs; Judicial Review, which must be done within 3 3. If there is a petition(s),the petition organiser months of the date of the decision. will speak, followed by the agent/applicant followed by any Ward Councillors; 4. The Committee may ask questions of the Agenda CHAIRMAN'S ANNOUNCEMENTS 1 Apologies for Absence 2 Declarations of Interest in matters coming before this meeting 3 To sign and receive the minutes of the previous meeting 1 - 8 4 Matters that have been notified in advance or urgent 5 To confirm that the items marked in Part 1 will be considered in public and those items marked in Part 2 will be heard in private PART I - Members, Public and Press Items are normally marked in the order that they will be considered, though the Chairman may vary this. The name of the local ward area is also given in addition to the address of the premises or land concerned. Major Applications without a Petition Address Ward Description & Recommendation Page 6 51 Belmont Road - Uxbridge Change of use from office (Use 9 - 20 North Class B1) to 14 residential units 34151/APP/2017/3332 (Use Class C3) together with 74 - 90 ancillary car parking, cycle storage and waste and recycling storage (Prior Approval) Recommendation: Approval 7 Abrook Arms 191 Uxbridge Demolition of the existing public 21 - 72 Harefield Road - North house and erection of a new building comprising 18 residential 91 - 118 18505/APP/2016/3534 units and a basement car park. Recommendation: Approval PART I - Plans for Major Applications Planning Committee 73 - 118 Agenda Item 3 Minutes MAJOR Applications Planning Committee 25 October 2017 Meeting held at Committee Room 5 - Civic Centre, High Street, Uxbridge UB8 1UW Committee Members Present : Councillors Eddie Lavery (Chairman), Ian Edwards (Vice-Chairman), Jazz Dhillon, Janet Duncan, Henry Higgins, John Morgan, John Oswell, David Yarrow and Raymond Graham (In place of Brian Stead) LBH Officers Present : Meghji Hirani (Planning Contracts & Planning Information), Edward Oteng (Major Applications Manager) and James McLean Smith (Major Planning Applications officer), Roisin Hogan (Planning Lawyer) and Neil Fraser (Democratic Services Officer) 63. APOLOGIES FOR ABSENC E (Agenda Item 1) Apologies were received from Councillor Stead. Councillor Graham was present as his substitute. 64. DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST IN MATTERS COMING BEFORE THIS MEETING (Agenda Item 2) None. 65. TO SIGN AND RECEIVE THE MINUTES OF THE P REVIOUS MEETINGS (Agenda Item 3) RESOLVED: That the minutes of the meetings held on 11 May, 30 May, 13 July and 3 October 2017 be approved as a correct record. 66. MATTERS THAT HAVE BEEN NOTIFIED IN ADV ANCE OR URGENT (Agenda Item 4) None. 67. TO CONFIRM THAT THE ITEMS MARKED IN PART 1 WILL BE CONSIDERED INPUBLIC AND THOSE ITEMS MARKED IN PART 2 WILL BE HEARD IN PRIVATE (Agenda Item 5) It was confirmed that all items were in Part I, and would therefore be considered in public. 68. RUISLIP BOWLS CLUB - 45220/APP/2017/3028 (Agenda Item 6) Single -storey extension to eastern elevation of club pavilion. Removal of 2 No. existing sheds to the east of the pavilion and replacement with new shed adjacent to the west of the pavilion. Enlargement of existing upper terrace. Page 1 Revisions to existing fene strations and access arrangements. Officers introduced the report, and highlighted the addendum. Members were informed that the application had been referred to the Planning Committee for determination as it was Council owned land.
Recommended publications
  • HA16 Rivers and Streams London's Rivers and Streams Resource
    HA16 Rivers and Streams Definition All free-flowing watercourses above the tidal limit London’s rivers and streams resource The total length of watercourses (not including those with a tidal influence) are provided in table 1a and 1b. These figures are based on catchment areas and do not include all watercourses or small watercourses such as drainage ditches. Table 1a: Catchment area and length of fresh water rivers and streams in SE London Watercourse name Length (km) Catchment area (km2) Hogsmill 9.9 73 Surbiton stream 6.0 Bonesgate stream 5.0 Horton stream 5.3 Greens lane stream 1.8 Ewel court stream 2.7 Hogsmill stream 0.5 Beverley Brook 14.3 64 Kingsmere stream 3.1 Penponds overflow 1.3 Queensmere stream 2.4 Keswick avenue ditch 1.2 Cannizaro park stream 1.7 Coombe Brook 1 Pyl Brook 5.3 East Pyl Brook 3.9 old pyl ditch 0.7 Merton ditch culvert 4.3 Grand drive ditch 0.5 Wandle 26.7 202 Wimbledon park stream 1.6 Railway ditch 1.1 Summerstown ditch 2.2 Graveney/ Norbury brook 9.5 Figgs marsh ditch 3.6 Bunces ditch 1.2 Pickle ditch 0.9 Morden Hall loop 2.5 Beddington corner branch 0.7 Beddington effluent ditch 1.6 Oily ditch 3.9 Cemetery ditch 2.8 Therapia ditch 0.9 Micham road new culvert 2.1 Station farm ditch 0.7 Ravenbourne 17.4 180 Quaggy (kyd Brook) 5.6 Quaggy hither green 1 Grove park ditch 0.5 Milk street ditch 0.3 Ravensbourne honor oak 1.9 Pool river 5.1 Chaffinch Brook 4.4 Spring Brook 1.6 The Beck 7.8 St James stream 2.8 Nursery stream 3.3 Konstamm ditch 0.4 River Cray 12.6 45 River Shuttle 6.4 Wincham Stream 5.6 Marsh Dykes
    [Show full text]
  • Written Evidence Submitted by Colne Valley Fisheries Consultative
    Colne Valley Fisheries Consultative WQR0011 Written evidence submitted by Colne Valley Fisheries Consultative 1. The Colne Valley Fisheries Consultative is based in the Colne Valley, Hertfordshire and represents fishery and conservation interests in the waterscapes of the River Colne, Mimmshall Brook, Upper Colne, Ellen Brook, R Ver, R Bulbourne, R Gade, R Chess, R Misbourne, Shires Ditch, Alder Bourne, Pymmes Brook, R Brent or Crane, Frays River, R Pinn, Bigley Ditch, Poyle Channel, Colne Brook, Wraysbury River, Bonehead Ditch, Duke of Northumberland’s River, Longford River, R Ash and the many lakes which hold water in the lands surrounding the rivers. 2. The rivers to the west of the catchment are all important chalk streams draining the Chilterns. The same chalk aquifer provides much of the water for consumption to Affinity Water, the supply company, and to Thames Water which has responsibility for waste water and sewage. 3. The Grand Union Canal runs into and out of the rivers Bulbourne, Gade and Colne and the whole system is a tributary of the River Thames. 4. Membership of the Consultative is open and presently it represents about forty angling clubs with local water holdings with a combined individual membership in the regions of 50,000. Many Londoners use the Colne Valley as their local wild place for angling, walking, sailing, boating, running and cycling with good communication links to and from the city. 5. The Consultative works in partnership with many stakeholders; the individual river groups, Herts & Middlesex Wildlife Trust, London Wildlife Trust, Colne Valley Regional Park, The Environment Agency, TW and AW, Angling Trust, Fish Legal, Wild Trout Trust and many others.
    [Show full text]
  • William Britton of Staines ………………………………
    WEST MIDDLESEX FAMILY HISTORY SOCIETY JOURNAL _____________________ Vol. 30 No.2 June 2012 WEST MIDDLESEX FAMILY HISTORY SOCIETY Executive Committee Chairman Mrs. Pam Smith 23 Worple Road, Staines, Middlesex TW18 1EF [email protected] Secretary Richard Chapman Golden Manor, Darby Gardens Sunbury-on-Thames, Middlesex TW16 5JW [email protected] Treasurer Ms Muriel Sprott 1 Camellia Place, Whitton, Twickenham, Middlesex TW2 7HZ [email protected] Membership Mrs Betty Elliott Secretary 89 Constance Road, Whitton, Twickenham Middlesex TW2 7HX [email protected] Programme Mrs. Kay Dudman Co-ordinator 119 Coldershaw Road, Ealing, London W13 9DU Bookstall Manager Mrs. Margaret Cunnew 25 Selkirk Road, Twickenham, Middlesex TW2 6PS [email protected] Committee Members Claudette Durham, Dennis Marks, Joan Storkey Post Holders not on the Executive Committee Editor Mrs. Bridget Purr 8 Sandleford Lane, Greenham, Thatcham, Berks RG19 8XW [email protected] Projects Co-ordinator Brian Page 121 Shenley Avenue, Ruislip, Middlesex HA4 6BU Society Archivist Yvonne Masson Examiner Paul Kershaw Society Web site www.west-middlesex-fhs.org.uk Subscriptions All Categories: £12 per annum Subscription year 1 January to 31 December If you wish to contact any of the above people, please use the postal or email address shown. In all correspondence please mark your envelope WMFHS in the upper left-hand corner; if a reply is needed, a SAE must be enclosed. Members are asked to note that receipts are only sent by request, if return postage is included. Published by West Middlesex Family History Society Registered Charity No.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Flood Risk Assessment
    London Regional Flood Risk Appraisal First Review August 2014 Contents Page Updating the January 2014 Consultation Draft 3 Executive Summary 4 Chapter 1 - Introduction 1.1 Wider Policy Background 5 1.2 The London Plan 6 1.3 The Sequential Test 8 1.4 How to use this RFRA 9 Chapter 2 - Overview of Flood Risk to London 2.1 Tidal Flood Risk 10 2.2 Fluvial Flood Risk 15 2.3 Surface Water Flood Risk 23 2.4 Foul Sewer Flood Risk 27 2.5 Groundwater Flood Risk 28 2.6 Reservoir Flood Risk 29 Chapter 3 – Spatial Implications of Flood Risk 3.1 Introduction 32 3.2 Specific Development Areas 33 3.3 Main Rail Network and Stations 47 3.4 London Underground & DLR Network 48 3.5 Main Road Network and Airports 49 3.6 Emergency Services 51 3.7 Schools 52 3.8 Utilities 53 3.9 Other Sites 55 Chapter 4 – Conclusions and Look Ahead 56 Appendix 1 List of Monitoring Recommendations 57 Appendix 2 Glossary 59 Appendix 3 Utility Infrastructure within Flood Risk Zones 60 Appendix 4 Comparison of Flood Risk Data with 2009 RFRA 66 Appendix 5 Flood Risk Maps Separate Document London Regional Flood Risk Appraisal – First Review – August 2014 page 2 of 66 Updating the January 2014 Consultation Draft This document represents an update of the draft, that was published in January 2014, in the light of a three-month consultation. Alongside further assistance by the Environment Agency, this final version of the First Review was also informed by responses the Mayor received from TfL as well as the London Boroughs of Richmond, Havering and Southwark (see Statement of Consultation provided separately).
    [Show full text]
  • COLNE VALLEY – LANDSCAPE on the EDGE Landscape Conservation Action Plan - March 2018
    COLNE VALLEY – LANDSCAPE ON THE EDGE Landscape Conservation Action Plan - March 2018 Chair of Landscape Partnership Lead Partner Colne Valley Park Community Interest Company Friends of the Colne Valley Park Spelthorne Natural History Society Front cover photo of Stockers Lake – Greg Townsend provide an essential project management tool for effective and efficient delivery. The partnership involved in preparing this LCAP considers it to be a compelling, innovative and realistic bid, with a range of projects which will connect people, biodiversity and access. ‘Colne Valley – Landscape on the Edge’ meets all the objectives of the Heritage Lottery Landscape The Landscape Partnership programme, run by the Heritage Lottery Partnership programme, with each of the projects proposed under the Fund, seeks to ‘conserve areas of distinctive landscape character’ and Scheme meeting at least one objective. promote a ‘holistic and balanced approach to the management of landscape heritage at a landscape scale’. Landscape Conservation Action Covering parts of Berkshire, Buckinghamshire, Greater London, Plans (LCAPs) required as part of this programme, provide the foundation Hertfordshire and Surrey, ‘Colne Valley – Landscape on the Edge’ will for planned work to benefit heritage, people and communities and are harness and stimulate organisations and communities across the area to needed in order to secure the Heritage Lottery Fund grant towards the support and sustain delivery. Residents and visitors will gain positive proposed work. perceptions about the area, will learn more about the landscape and feel more confident about exploring it. They will be supported to assist in Our LCAP, ‘Colne Valley – Landscape on the Edge’, comprises a suite of ‘shaping their place’, and feel more motivated to venture out and enjoy exciting projects (the Scheme), and seeks to: set these in the landscape the area, and to participate in efforts to improve and maintain it.
    [Show full text]
  • Ickenhamanddistrict Societyofmodelengineers
    105 Ickenham and District Society of Model Engineers Spring 2015 Number 105 Spring 2015 105 Contents: 1 Cover Story 13 Who'd Be A Signal 6 Chairman's Chat Engineer 7 Ashpan Notebook 24 IDSME Ditch Water 8 The Model Engineer & Used To Quench London Model Regency London's Engineering Thirst! Exhibitions 32 Clothe To Confusion Ickenham & District Society of Model Engineers was founded on 8th October 1948. Ickenham and District Society of Model Engineers, a company limited by guarantee, was incorporated on 10th September 1999. Registered in England No: 3839364. Website: WWW.IDSME.CO.UK IDSME Members Message Board: http://idsme001.proboards.com Hon. Secretary and Registered Office: David Sexton, 25 Copthall Road East, Ickenham, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB10 8SD. Ashpan is produced for members of Ickenham and District Society of Model Engineers by Patrick Rollin, 84 Lawrence Drive, Ickenham, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB10 8RW Email: [email protected] Ashpan Number 105 Cover Story Over the course of the winter progress has been made on a number of projects at IDSME. Our cover photo shows Peter Fitch and Geoff Parry at work laying a paved path alongside the stores building which will finally give proper access to the gardening store section of the building. At the time of going to press this was almost complete. Earlier in the winter Peter was regularly seen up a ladder lopping bits off the tree by the turntable. As he got higher and higher, members of the Health & Safety sub- committee carefully avoided that part of the site while he was working. Demolition of the tree was finally completed on the February working party.
    [Show full text]
  • Grand Union Canal Walk
    Explore the Colne Valley Park Countryside on your doorstep Points of interest/history 1) The Grand Union Canal was completed in 1805, linking London and the Midlands, and vitally important to Britain’s Industrial CIRCULAR WALK 12: GRAND UNION CANAL Revolution. Denham Deep Lock is so called because at 11 feet it is the deepest on the canal. This was caused by mill owners on the 4 MILES River Frays (passing under the canal at the lock) insisting that the flow on their river was unaffected - hence the long stretch of canal A peaceful stretch of the Grand Union Canal with views over ahead with no lock. John Fray was Baron Lord Chancellor of the magnificent lakes with thriving bird life. Exchequer in the 1400s. He had considerable experience of rivers and mills around London and had a financial interest in Cowley Hall - a property in Hillingdon which adjoins the Frays River. The Frays River is fed by the River Colne at a weir north of Denham Lock. It Access: No steep slopes, but some muddy paths in winter. runs parallel to the Colne for around four miles before rejoining it south of West Drayton. By 1641 the Frays River powered at least 5 Refreshments: Cafes at the Colne Valley Park Visitor Centre (1), mills. The last mill, Fountain's Mill in Uxbridge, was in operation Fran’s Tea Garden at Denham Deep Lock (2), and Widewater Café until after World War Two. on Moorhall Road (3). The Bear on the Barge Pub (A). 2) There are occasional passenger trains from Marylebone to Public transport: By train: Trains from London Marylebone and Denham and beyond.
    [Show full text]
  • 0005-R-West.Pdf
    05 Baseline and Environmental Impacts: Maidenhead to Westbourne Park 5.1 Introduction 5.1.1 This chapter describes the western route section of Crossrail from Maidenhead Station to Portobello Junction (Westbourne Park), and the significant residual temporary and permanent environmental impacts that may arise from construction and operation. 5.1.2 Crossrail will use the existing Great Western relief lines (in normal operations) with additional new tracks at some locations. For example, a new line will be constructed over about 1 km between Langley and West Drayton, to link with existing (but upgraded) freight lines to east and west providing increased track capacity. 5.1.3 Major new structures or facilities include: a new dive-under (rail underpass) at Acton (W4), a new flyover at Stockley in Hillingdon (W11), a freight loop from Langley to West Drayton (W14, W15,W16); and new or remodelled sidings at Maidenhead (W25), West Drayton (W13) and Old Oak Common depot (W3). Crossrail will require, at several places, changes to the permanent way, such as new track or track realignment. It will also require new or extended station platforms to accommodate Crossrail’s 200 m long trains. At nine stations, improved facilities, including new or modified ticket halls, will be provided to accommodate Crossrail passengers. 5.1.4 The GWML between Paddington and the Stockley Road bridge is the only section that is electrified. The remainder of the route west of Stockley Road bridge will require the provision of new 25 kV AC overhead line equipment (OHLE). This will require the raising of some bridges or lowering of track beneath them.
    [Show full text]
  • Display PDF in Separate
    Land Use Consultants LOWER RIVER COLNE DRAFT CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT PLAN Prepared by Land Use Consultants on behaif of The National Rivers Authority (Thames Region) March 1991 Energy House, Lombard St. 43 Chalton Street Gleniffer House Lichfield. Staffs. WS13 6DP London NW1 1JB Glasgow G3 7XH Tel: 0543 258868 071 383 5784 041 332 8098 Fax: 0543 415469 071 383 4798 041 333 0918- environment AGENCY 122682 I I I I I IJI I r- i i u I © i i tb’jj i c 1 r© i t% i i f I CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2 1.1 Overview 2 1.3 Introduction to the Lower Colne Catchment 3 2.0 CATCHMENT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Introduction 8 2.2 Geology 10 2.3 Geomorphology 12 2.4 Climate 14 2.5 Drainage: Surface Water 16 2.6 Drainage: Groundwater 18 2.7 Foul Water 20 2.8 River Quality 22 2.9 Fisheries 24 2.10 Ecology 26 2.11 Landscape 28 3.0 CURRENT AND FUTURE USES OF THE CATCHMENT 3.1 Introduction 30 3.2 Archaeology/Heritage 32 3.3 Residential Development 34 3.4 Industrial/Commercial Development 36 3.5 Commu nicatlons 38 3.6 Minerals/Waste Disposal 40 3.7 Agriculture 42 3.8 Recreation 44 3.9 Navigation 46 3.10 Hydrology/Flooding 48 3.11 River Geomorphology 52 3.12 Water Resources 53 3.13 Water Quality 54 3.14 Fisheries 55 3.15 Ecology 56 3.16 Landscape 57 4.0 NRA OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES 4.1 Introduction 60 4.2 Water Resources 61 4.3 Pollution Control and Water Quality 62 4.4 Flood Defence and Land Drainage 63 4.5 Fisheries 63 4.6 Recreation 64 4.7 Navigation 65 4.8 Conservation 65 5.0 ISSUES AND STRATEGY 5.1 Introduction 68 5.2 Key Issues - - - - 68 5.3 Recommended Strategy 73 5.4 Action by Function 82 SECTION 1 INTRODUCTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 OVERVIEW The National Rivers Authority Thames Region (NRA TR) is currently producing three catchment management plans (CMP).
    [Show full text]
  • Environment Committee Tuesday 19 June 2001 Time
    AVAILABLE IN LARGE PRINT Meeting: Environment Committee th Date: Tuesday 19 June 2001 Time: 7.30pm. Place: Committee Room 5, Civic Centre Uxbridge Committee Administrator: Susan Came Tel: 01895 250472 Press Enquiries: Roy Mills Tel: 01895 250534 Councillors on the Committee Conservative Labour Liberal Democrat Mike Heywood (Chairman) John Oswell (Group Lead) Janet Campbell Jacqueline Griffith (Vice Graham Tomlin Chairman) David Horne Albert Kanjee Jim Jonas Sandra Jenkins Dave Allam Val Robins Advisory Members Susan Sweeting Friends of the Earth Roger Taylor Hillingdon Ecology Forum Ian Cantley Ruislip Woods Management Committee Ian Grant Hillingdon Horticultural & Allotments Federation Substitute Councillors Graham Horn Lindsay Bliss Andrew Vernazza Alf Langley Dalip Chand You are invited to attend the above meeting. The agenda is attached. David Brough Head of Committee Services Smoking is not allowed in the Civic Centre including the Committee Rooms. DESPATCH DATE: MONDAY 11TH JUNE 2001 ENVIRONMENT COMMITTEE 19TH JUNE 2001 AGENDA PART 1 – PUBLIC 1. Apologies for absence, to report the presence of any substitute members at the Committee and approval of any changes in Sub-Committee memberships. 2. To receive the minutes of the meetings held on 20th March and 17th May 2001, copies attached. 3. To consider recommendations and resolutions from following Sub-Committees:- Transportation Sub-Committee of 24th May 2001, to follow. Parking Sub-Committee of 11th June 2001, to follow Hayes & Harlington Planning Sub-Committees of 19.2.01, 19.2.01 and 29.3.01. Uxbridge Planning Sub-Committees of 15.2.01, 27.3.01 and 24.4.01. Ruislip/Northwood Planning Sub-Committees of 27.2.01, 3.4.01 and 8.5.01.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Improving Transport in Hillingdon
    DRAFT LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN: 2011 – 2014 IMPROVING TRANSPORT IN HILLINGDON London Borough of Hillingdon December 2010 DRAFT LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION PLAN 2011-2014: IMPROVING TRANSPORT IN HILLINGDON CONTENTS LIST EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION Background How has Hillingdon’s LIP2 been developed? The format of Hillingdon’s LIP2 2. TRANSPORT OBJECTIVES Introduction Local Context Local Challenges and Opportunities 3. DELIVERY PLAN Introduction Potential Funding Sources Delivery Actions Programme of Investment Risk Management 4. PERFORMANCE MONITORING PLAN Introduction Target Setting Programme Monitoring Process Before and After Scheme Implementation Monitoring TABLES 2.1 Journey Time Comparisons by Mode 2.2 Public Transport Journey Times between Metropolitan Centres and Central London 2.3 List of objectives/goals of relevant strategies/plans 2.4 Strategic LIP2 objectives 2.5 Conformity of LIP2 objectives with the Strategic Environmental Assessment 3.1 Total s106 funds held as at 30/9/2010 for transport/highways related schemes 3.2 Projected Funding Source Allocations 3.3 Asset Base - Desired and Current Levels of Service 3.4 Hillingdon’s Proposed Programme of Investment 3.5 Risk Management Matrix 4.1 Investment Programme Monitor 4.2 LIP Objectives and Respective Indicators by Target Category A Core Targets C1 Bus Service Reliability C2 Principal Roads Asset Condition C3 Road Traffic Casualties C4 Number of People Travelling In/Out of Hillingdon by Mode C5 CO2 Emission Reduction in Hillingdon B Local Targets L1 Congestion Hot Spots L2
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Colne Improvement Scheme November 1995 Shire
    LOWER COLNE IMPROVEMENT SCHEME NOVEMBER 1995 SHIRE DITCH AND COLNE BROOK UXBRIDGE ENVIRONMENT AGENCY 042421 LOWER COLNE IMPROVEMENT SCHEME INTRODUCTION The Lower Colne Improvement Scheme is an £18M river improvement scheme in the Lower Colne system of rivers, all tributaries of the River Thames. The River Colne catchment varies in shape, topography, land use and hydrological and hydraulic complexity perhaps more so than any other catchment in the Thames Region of the National Rivers Authority. The analysis of the system is therefore also complex, and the solutions to flooding problems, whether local or strategic, are rarely straightforward. The Colne river system drains 1000 km2 of land to the north west of the London conurbation, which is approximately 10% of the non-tidal Thames catchment to Teddington Weir. It has a fan shaped catchment, with chalk predominantly outcropping in the upper area whilst London clay underlies gravels in the narrow neck downstream of Watford/Rickmans worth. The catchment characteristics, with the majority of urban runoff received in the downstream reaches, creates long flat flood hydrographs not prone to rapid response or flash floods, with the total 1 in 100 year flood flow to the Thames in the order of 50 m3/s. The downstream reaches of the river system below Rickmansworth are a complex network of interlinked parallel channels filling the relatively flat river valley through which the entire catchment must drain. The runoff from the urbanised areas of Uxbridge and Staines below Rickmansworth have no significant impact on major river flood events in the Lower Colne reaches, as this runoff occurs well in advance of that from the Upper Colne.
    [Show full text]