DOCSLIB.ORG

Farm Service Agency Systems Inventory

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Farm Service Agency Systems Inventory FARM SERVICE AGENCY SYSTEMS INVENTORY FARM SERVICE AGENCY SYSTEMS INVENTORY Acreage Crop Reporting Streamline Initiative (ACRSI) ........................................................................................... 151 Acreage Reporting and Compliance Systems (ARCS) ............................................................................................... 150 Aerial Imagery Shipping System (AISS) ....................................................................................................................... 26 Aerial Photography Inspection System (APIS) ............................................................................................................. 20 Ag Credit System - Retired ........................................................................................................................................... 212 AGI Review and Compliance Tracking System (ARCT)........................................................................................... 192 Agricultural Foreign Investment Disclosure Act (AFIDA) ........................................................................................ 104 Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) ............................................................................................................................... 11 APFO Physical Security System (APSS) ....................................................................................................................... 17 Appeals and Litigation Information System (ALIS) .................................................................................................. 186 Appraisal System (AS) .................................................................................................................................................... 79 Approved Warehouses Clickable Maps Application (AWCM) .................................................................................. 42 Asparagus Revenue Market Loss Assistance Payment Program (ALAP) – Retired ............................................... 212 Assessment/Promotion Fee System (APFS) ................................................................................................................ 105 Asset Management System (AMS) ................................................................................................................................. 27 Assignment/Joint Payment System (AJPS) - Retired ................................................................................................. 212 Automated Claims System (ACS) - Retired ................................................................................................................ 212 Automated Collection Application System Notes (ACASNotes) – Retired .............................................................. 212 Automated Cotton Reporting System (ACRS) ............................................................................................................... 7 Automated Information Management (AIM) ............................................................................................................. 144 Automated Price Support System (APSS) ..................................................................................................................... 50 Average Crop Revenue Election (ACRE) ..................................................................................................................... 11 Biomass Crop Assistance Program (BCAP) ................................................................................................................. 90 Bridges to Opportunity (BTO) ..................................................................................................................................... 211 Burley Tobacco Quota Systems – Inactive .................................................................................................................. 213 Cash Receipts System (CASH) - Mainframe .............................................................................................................. 106 Cash Receipts System (CASH) S/36- Retired .............................................................................................................. 212 Ceiling & Vacancy Management System (CVMS) ..................................................................................................... 193 Central Claims Database System (CCDB) – Retired ................................................................................................. 212 Centralized Disbursement System (CDS) .................................................................................................................... 107 Check Accounting System (CAS) ................................................................................................................................. 108 Check Writing System (CWS) – Retired ..................................................................................................................... 212 Commodity Credit Corporation Budget Formulation (CCCBF) ................................................................................ 38 Commodity Loan Processing System (CLPS) ............................................................................................................... 51 Commodity Operation Systems (COS) - Retired ........................................................................................................ 212 Commodity Operations Systems Enterprise Data Warehouse (COSEDW) – Investment Shift ............................ 212 Common Application Framework (CAF) ................................................................................................................... 136 Common Business Services (CBS) ............................................................................................................................... 137 Common Payment Program (CPP).............................................................................................................................. 154 Common Receivables System (CRS) - Retired ........................................................................................................... 212 Communication Tracking and Control System (CTCS) ............................................................................................ 133 Compliance Reporting System (CRS) - Retired ......................................................................................................... 212 Concentration Banking System (CBS) – Replaced by NRRS .................................................................................... 212 Conservation Contract Maintenance System (CCMS) ................................................................................................ 98 Conservation Funds Ledgers (CFLS) ............................................................................................................................ 91 Conservation Legacy Upload (CLUE) ........................................................................................................................... 92 Conservation Payments (CP) ......................................................................................................................................... 93 Conservation Reporting & Evaluating System (CRES) ............................................................................................... 94 Conservation Reserve Program (CRP).......................................................................................................................... 95 Consolidated Management System (CMS) .................................................................................................................... 19 Consolidated Production System (CPS) ........................................................................................................................ 21 February 2015 Page 1 FARM SERVICE AGENCY SYSTEMS INVENTORY Contract Management System (CM) ............................................................................................................................. 22 Cooperative Marketing Association System (CMA) .................................................................................................... 53 COPS eLDP Web Service (COPS-eLDP-WS) ................................................................................................................ 9 CORE General Ledger System (CORE) ..................................................................................................................... 109 CORVID (COTS Training System) – Retired ............................................................................................................ 212 Cotton On-Line Processing System (COPS) ................................................................................................................... 8 Cotton Receipts Tracking System (CRTS) – Retired ................................................................................................. 212 Cotton User Marketing Certificate System (CUMC) ................................................................................................... 43 Cotton Warehouse System (CWS) – Retired .............................................................................................................. 212 County Combination/Decombination .......................................................................................................................... 131 County Office Administrative Expense System (COE) - Retired
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Have Bog, Will Travel Page 18 AG CO-OPS’ $212 BILLION FOOTPRINT 2015 Co-Op Statistics Report Now Available from USDA
    l a r u R CCOOOOPPJanuEE ary/FeRRbruary 2AA017 TTIIVVEESS Have Bog, Will Travel Page 18 AG CO-OPS’ $212 BILLION FOOTPRINT 2015 Co-op Statistics Report Now Available From USDA This report presents an in-depth look at the enormous impact ag co-ops have on the nation’s economy. The sector-by-sector analysis and trends tracked can be used by co-op managers and directors to gauge the performance of their operations. n For a free hard copy, send e-mail to: [email protected], n For a free electronic subscription to USDA’s Rural or call (202) 720-7395, or write to: USDA Co-op Info., Stop Cooperatives magazine, please go to: 3254, 1400 Independence Ave. SW, Washington, DC 20250. http://www.rdlist.sc.egov.usda.gov/listserv/mainservlet. Please indicate title of report and number of copies needed. n Send hard copy subscription requests to: n To download from the internet, visit: [email protected]. www.rd.usda.gov/publications/publications-cooperatives. Features Volume 84, Number 1 January/February 2017 Rural Cooperatives (1088-8845) is published bimonthly by USDA Rural Development, 1400 Independence Ave. SW, Stop 3254, Washington, DC. 20250- 0705. The Secretary of Agriculture has determined that publication of this p. 10 p. 18 p. 28 periodical is necessary in the transaction of public business required by law of the Department. Periodicals postage paid at Washington, DC. and additional mailing offices. Copies may be obtained from the Superintendent of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, 04 Co-op Sales, State by State DC, 20402, at $23 per year.
    [Show full text]
  • Rural Development's Rural Utilities Service
    Rural Development’s Rural Utilities Service (RUS) Electric Programs Jonathan P. Claffey | Senior Policy Advisor Office of the Assistant Administrator Electric Program | Rural Utilities Service USDA Rural Development Washington, DC 20250 Cell: (202)251-3771 | Office: (202) 720-9545 | Fax: (202) 690-0717 [email protected] United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Seven Mission Areas Secretary Tom Vilsack Farm & Foreign Agriculture Services Food, Nutrition and Consumer Services Food Safety Marketing & Regulatory Programs Natural Resources and Environment Research, Education and Economics Rural Development Rural Development’s Mission To assist rural communities in creating prosperity so they are self-sustaining and economically thriving through investments that create ladders of opportunity, build regional resilience and support the growth of emerging markets. Rural Development Program Areas Rural Utilities Service Rural Housing & Community Facilities Rural Business & Cooperative Service • Electric Program • Homeownership Loans • Business and Industry Guaranteed • Water & Environmental • Home Repair Loans & Grants Loans Programs • Mutual Self-Help Technical • Intermediary Relending Program • Telecommunications and Assistance Grants • Rural Business Development Grants Broadband Programs • Multi-Family Housing Loans • Rural Energy for America Program • Farm Labor Housing Loans & Grants • Value Added Producer Grants • Housing Preservation Grants • Cooperative Development Assistance • Community Facilities Loans & Grants USDA Rural Development National Office General Field Native American Representatives Coordinators State Directors Area Directors Program Directors Specialists Architects Engineers Technicians 5 Rural Development Funding Streams Programs Guaranteed Direct Direct Loans Loans Payments Grants 6 Utilities Programs History The USDA Rural Utilities Service evolved from the Rural Electrification Administration (REA) formed as part of the Federal Government’s “New Deal” programs during the Great Depression, designed to help the neediest in America.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating the Relative Cost Effectiveness of the Farm Service Agency’S Farm Loan Programs
    United States Department of Agriculture Farm Service Agency Economic Policy Analysis Staff August 2006 Report to Congress Evaluating the Relative Cost Effectiveness of the Farm Service Agency’s Farm Loan Programs Charles Dodson Steven Koenig* *Agricultural Economists, Economic Policy Analysis Staff, Farm Service Agency, 3741 SB, 202-720-3451,[email protected], [email protected] ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Valuable comments and suggestions were provided by the Farm Service Agency’s Office of the Deputy Administrator for Farm Loan Programs during the course of drafting the report. Chris Beyerhelm, Assistant Deputy Administrator, and Jim Radintz, Director, Loan Making Division, had primary responsibility for these comments and suggestions. Sheila Oellrich, Loan Servicing and Property Management Division, provided valuable assistance in developing data necessary to complete the report. Technical guidance and suggestions were provided by Joy Harwood, Director, and Terry Hickenbotham, of the Farm Service Agency’s Economic and Policy Analysis Staff. Members of a USDA Advisory Working Group for the report provided helpful comments and suggestions, including Joe Glauber (Office of the Chief Economist), David Grahn (Office of the General Counsel), Jim Staiert (Office of Budget and Program Analysis), Pat Sullivan, (Economic Research Service), and Dennis Taitano (Farm Service Agency, Budget Division). Jerome Stam, retired Senior Economist at USDA's Economic Research Service, provided historical documentation used in preparing the background discussions. Technical editing and report preparation were provided by April MacDonald and Mitch Yoshida. TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary .…..…………………………………………….……………1 I. Introduction……………………………………………………………………8 II. Justification for Federal Farm Credit Programs..……..…………...……...….11 III. Overview of Farm Loan Programs………...……………………..…….…….13 a.
    [Show full text]
  • Greening the Old New Deal: Strengthening Rural Electric Cooperative Supports and Oversight to Combat Climate Change
    Missouri Law Review Volume 85 Issue 2 Article 20 Spring 2020 Greening the Old New Deal: Strengthening Rural Electric Cooperative Supports and Oversight to Combat Climate Change Gabriel Pacyniak Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Gabriel Pacyniak, Greening the Old New Deal: Strengthening Rural Electric Cooperative Supports and Oversight to Combat Climate Change, 85 MO. L. REV. (2020) Available at: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/mlr/vol85/iss2/20 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Missouri Law Review by an authorized editor of University of Missouri School of Law Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Pacyniak: Greening the Old New Deal: Strengthening Rural Electric Cooperati Greening the Old New Deal: Strengthening Rural Electric Cooperative Supports and Oversight to Combat Climate Change Gabriel Pacyniak* ABSTRACT New Deal cooperatives succeeded in electrifying rural America when for- profit utilities would not. Today, however, rural electric cooperatives are lagging behind when it comes to meeting the challenge of climate change. Cooperatives have collectively been slower to embrace the shift to low-carbon electricity than for-profit and municipal utilities and have served as a drag on state and federal clean energy and climate policies. This is partially because of the structural differences between cooperatives and other utilities, but also because of a weak and underdetermined federal and state regulatory structure. A few cooperatives in Colorado and New Mexico are seeking to lead the charge to a low-carbon electricity system, but they are finding themselves stymied by their own power supply cooperative.
    [Show full text]
  • GGD-96-14 Government Corporations: Profiles of Existing Government
    United States General Accounting Office Report to the Ranking Minority Member, GAO Subcommittee on Post Office and Civil Service, Committee on Governmental Affairs, U.S. Senate December 1995 GOVERNMENT CORPORATIONS Profiles of Existing Government Corporations GAO/GGD-96-14 United States General Accounting Office GAO Washington, D.C. 20548 General Government Division B-259476 December 13, 1995 The Honorable David Pryor Ranking Minority Member Subcommittee on Post Office and Civil Service Committee on Governmental Affairs United States Senate Dear Senator Pryor: This report responds in part to your request that we review government corporations (GC). GCs are generally federally chartered entities created to serve a public function of a predominantly business nature. At your request, this report identifies (1) GCs presently in operation and (2) their reported adherence to 15 federal statutes. Also, at your request, in March 1995, we reported on proposals to create additional GCs.1 To meet our objectives, we surveyed 58 entities that were potential GCs to Scope and identify their legal status and adherence to 15 federal statutes. We Methodology identified these 58 entities by including (1) all GCs listed in the Government Corporation Control Act (GCCA)2 (excluding the United States Railway Association, which was abolished in 1987); (2) entities that were listed in at least three of five major government corporation studies done in the last 15 years;3 and (3) additional entities we identified during the course of our work. As agreed with your office, we relied on the self-reported legal status of those entities surveyed to determine the number of GCs.
    [Show full text]
  • DEPARTMENT of AGRICULTURE Agricultural Marketing Service
    This document is scheduled to be published in the Federal Register on 04/21/2021 and available online at DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTUREfederalregister.gov/d/2021-08152, and on govinfo.gov Agricultural Marketing Service [Document Number AMS-TM-21-0034] Supply Chains for the Production of Agricultural Commodities and Food Products AGENCY: Agricultural Marketing Service, USDA. ACTION: Notice; request for public comments. SUMMARY: On February 24, 2021, President Biden issued an Executive Order on “America’s Supply Chains,” which directs several Federal agency actions to secure and strengthen America’s supply chains. One of these directions is for the Secretary of Agriculture (the Secretary) to submit, within one year, a report to the President that assesses the supply chains for the production of agricultural commodities and food products. This notice requests comments and information from the public to assist the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) in preparing the report required by the Executive Order. Through this notice, USDA is also requesting public comment to inform our thinking regarding how stimulus relief programs and spending related to food supply chain resilience as authorized by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 (CAA), and the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) can help to increase durability and resilience within the U.S. food supply. DATES: Comments must be received by [INSERT DATE 30 DAYS AFTER DATE OF PUBLICATION IN THE FEDERAL REGISTER]. ADDRESSES: All written comments in response to this notice should be posted online at www.regulations.gov. Comments received will be posted without change, including any personal information provided. All comments should reference the docket number AMS-TM-21-0034, the date of submission, and the page number of this issue of the Federal Register.
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture Big Data (Agbd) Challenges and Opportunities from Farm to Table: a Midwest
    Agriculture Big Data (AgBD) Challenges and Opportunities From Farm To Table: A Midwest Big Data Hub Community† Whitepaper Shashi Shekhar1, Patrick Schnable2, David LeBauer3, Katherine Baylis4 and Kim VanderWaal5 1 Dept. of Computer Science & Engineering, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities 2 Dept. of Agronomy, Dept. of Genetics, Development and Cell Biology, Iowa State University 3 Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 4 Dept. of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 5 Dept. of Veterinary Population Medicine, University of Minnesota, Twin Cities Abstract: Big data is critical to help agriculture meet the challenges of growing world population, climate change and urbanization. Recent success stories include precision agriculture, phenotyping, and global agricultural monitoring. Many of these initiatives are made possible by novel data sources such as satellite imagery, instrumented tractors and initiatives such as the Global Open Data for Agriculture and Nutrition (GODAN). This whitepaper surveys agricultural big datasets, characterizes their limitations, lists transformative opportunities and suggests a plan to engage and nurture Agriculture Big Data (AgBD) research community. Public big data includes satellite imagery (e.g., Earth on Amazon Web Services, Google Earth Engine), surveys (e.g., National Agricultural Statistics Service), financial statistics (e.g., Economic Research Service), social media (e.g., Twitter), etc. Private datasets describe yield (e.g., precision agriculture, Farm Service Agency), farm loss (e.g., Risk Management Agency) and condemnation (Food Safety and Inspection Service), etc. Limitations include data and metadata gaps, insufficient data storage, preservation, and documentation, lack of scalable spatiotemporal big data analytics methods, and inadequate secure data-sharing mechanisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Financing for Utilities Serving Rural Areas
    The Rural Utilities Service (RUS): A Strategic and Financial Partner for Municipal Electric Systems Presented by: Joseph S. Badin Deputy Assistant Administrator, Loan Origination & Approval, RUS Electric Program October 2019 RUS RE Act Electric Programs Furnishing and improving Electric Service in Rural Areas. • Provides leadership and capital to maintain, expand, upgrade, and modernize America's vast rural electric infrastructure. • To finance the construction of electric distribution, transmission and generation facilities, including system improvements and replacements. • Under the authority of the Rural Electrification Act of 1936 (RE Act), we provide direct loans and loan guarantees (FFB), as well as grants and other energy project financing to electric utilities (wholesale and retail providers of electricity) that serve customers in rural areas (rural beneficiaries). • FFB guaranteed loans provided under the RE Act: Treasury + 1/8% Up to 35 year loan term 3 Money $ale! APPROXIMATE FFB QUARTERLY RATES 3-mo 6-mo 1-yr 2-yr 3-yr 5-yr 7-yr 10-yr 20-yr 30-yr 2.00 1.88 1.76 1.60 1.53 1.50 1.55 1.61 1.82 1.91 Plus 1/8% 8/23/19 rates (rates set daily) 4 The Rural Utilities Service History The RUS of today evolved from the Rural Electrification Administration (REA) formed as part of the Federal government’s “New Deal” programs during the Great Depression, designed to help the neediest in America… Rural America Before Federal Programs Private utilities were unwilling to serve rural areas • No industry or large loads for electric, telephone, or sanitary water service in rural areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Oneusda Budget Reports, and Employees’ Perspectives
    Find your agency on this map to see USDA is made up of 29 agencies and offices with nearly corresponds to a customer, and represents an industry 100,000 employees serving at more than 4,500 locations or area that might benefit from USDA services. Listed who you serve, where USDA plays a worldwide. The people illustrated below represent USDA’s beside each building are the agencies offering services in Meeting Customers Where They Are role, and what other agencies serve top 10 customers according to customer data analyzed this space. Conduct your own research and uncover your from an in-depth audit of messaging on agency websites, customers’ needs with USDA’s user research templates OneUSDA budget reports, and employees’ perspectives. Each building found at https://www.usda.gov/digital-strategy/tools. alongside you. Universities Community Centers Public Lands Students, fellows, professors, and researchers Rural Development grants help to build municipal FS works to prevent damage to natural resources and like Adam the Academic get grants to conduct buildings that can be used as community gathering the environment, implement conservation initiatives, cutting-edge research at colleges/universities and places. People like Candice the Community and promote good land management. This enables publish their findings for the agriculture sector to Leader use these spaces to host after-school Ava the Adventurer to connect with nature. use in their work. programs, farmers markets, and life skills classes. FSA RMA AMS FS ARS ERS NASS NIFA FSA NRCS FNS FSIS ARS ERS NASS NIFA FNS ARS ERS NASS NIFA RBCS RHS RUS USDA Facilities and Offices Schools Through research and analysis, scientists in the Children like Ken the Kid get consistent hot meals Municipal Buildings and Public Utilities public and private sectors like Sunali the Scientist Food Establishments at school, learn about balanced diets through work with USDA to ensure a safe, sustainable, MyPlate, discover nature with Smokey Bear, and Federal and local government champions like competitive U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Assistance for Farm Operations and Farm Households in the Face of COVID-19
    COVID-19 Working Paper #AP-090 July 2021 COVID-19 Working Paper: Financial Assistance for Farm Operations and Farm Households in the Face of COVID-19 Anil K. Giri, Tia M. McDonald, Dipak Subedi, and Christine Whitt This paper has been published through USDA Economic Research Service’s (ERS) COVID- 19 Working Paper series. ERS’ temporary Working Paper series is designed to publicly release preliminary analyses relevant to the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on agriculture, food, the environment, and rural America in a timely manner. ERS’ COVID-19 Working Papers have not undergone the review and editorial process generally accorded official ERS publications, but they have been reviewed by ERS economists and social scientists through an expedited review process. Page | 1 COVID-19 Working Paper Financial Assistance for Farm Operations and Farm Households in the Face of COVID-19, AP-090 USDA, Economic Research Service Abstract On March 13, 2020, the U.S. Federal Government declared a national emergency based on the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. The Government’s response included providing assistance programs related to the economic impacts of COVID-19. This study estimates the total direct Government assistance to farm operations and farm households in calendar year 2020 from COVID-19 related programs, the Market Facilitation Program (MFP), and other existing Farm Bill (FB) programs. The insights from this study supplement the triannual U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Economic Research Service (ERS) farm income forecasts by providing stakeholders more forecasting details, including information regarding the distribution of Federal payments and eligibility. This working paper further documents methodologies relevant for a timely update of similar payments in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • Broadband Loan and Grant Programs in the USDA's Rural
    Broadband Loan and Grant Programs in the USDA’s Rural Utilities Service March 22, 2019 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov RL33816 Broadband Loan and Grant Programs in the USDA’s Rural Utilities Service Summary Given the large potential impact broadband access may have on the economic development of rural America, concern has been raised over a “digital divide” between rural and urban or suburban areas with respect to broadband deployment. While there are many examples of rural communities with state-of-the-art telecommunications facilities, recent surveys and studies have indicated that, in general, rural areas tend to lag behind urban and suburban areas in broadband deployment. According to the Federal Communications Commission’s Communications Marketplace Report, as of 2017, 24% of Americans in rural areas lacked coverage from fixed terrestrial 25 Mbps/3 Mbps broadband, as compared to only 1.5% of Americans in urban areas. The comparatively lower population density of rural areas is likely a major reason why broadband is less deployed than in more highly populated suburban and urban areas. Particularly for wireline broadband technologies—such as cable modem and fiber—the greater the geographical distances among customers, the larger the cost to serve those customers. The Rural Utilities Service (RUS) at the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) houses three ongoing assistance programs exclusively created and dedicated to financing broadband deployment: the Rural Broadband Access Loan and Loan Guarantee Program, the Community Connect Grant Program, and the ReConnect Program. Additionally, the Telecommunications Infrastructure Loan and Loan Guarantee Program (previously the Telephone Loan Program) funds broadband deployment in rural areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Secretary's Memorandum: Advancing U.S. Ag Trade & Improving Service
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY Washington, D.C. 20250 May 11, 2017 SECRETARY'S MEMORANDUM ______________ Advancing U.S. Agricultural Trade and Improving Service to Agricultural Producers 1. INTRODUCTION The purpose of this Memorandum is to advance agricultural trade by creating an Under Secretary for Trade and Foreign Agricultural Affairs, create a customer-focused culture of public service and improve the effectiveness, efficiency and accountability of agencies who provide services to agricultural producers by realigning agencies in the Department, and elevate the importance of the activities carried out by the Rural Development mission area by realigning those agencies to report directly to the Secretary. 2. AUTHORITY Actions ordered under this memorandum are taken in accordance with Executive Order 13781, “Comprehensive Plan for Reorganizing the Executive Branch,” and to implement section 3208 of the Agricultural Act of 2014 using the authority of the Secretary to reorganize the Department under section 4(a) of Reorganization Plan No. 2 of 1953 (5 U.S.C. App.; 7 U.S.C. 2201 note). 3. ACTIONS ORDERED a. Establishment There is hereby established an Under Secretary for Trade and Foreign Agricultural Affairs and an Under Secretary for Farm Production and Conservation, who shall report to the Secretary of Agriculture. b. Realignment and Renaming The Foreign Agricultural Service, previously established within the Office of the Under Secretary for Farm and Foreign Agricultural Services, is transferred from the supervision of the Under Secretary for Farm and Foreign Agricultural Services, and is re-established under the Under Secretary for Trade and Foreign Agricultural Affairs and authorities related to the Foreign Agricultural Service previously delegated to the Under Secretary for Farm and Foreign Agricultural Services are re-delegated to the Under Secretary for Trade and Foreign Agricultural Affairs.
    [Show full text]