DOCSLIB.ORG

An Hymn to the Bureaucrats in Brussels

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
An Hymn to the Bureaucrats in Brussels A hymn to the bureaucrats in Brussels Who are these EU bureaucrats, the new type of civil servants that we call eurocrats? The author Robert Menasse flew to Brussels, rented an apartment and tried to get to know as many of them as possible. The outcome surprised him. Amongst all monsters, from basilisks to Dracula through to King Kong, civil servants stand out because their imaginary presence is not merely the product of fear and excitement in the bourgeois mind, visions of menace and disaster repeatedly conjured up in order to be able to fantasise about an ultimate lucky escape, but really a fantasy of society as a whole: the image of the civil servant is a projection of all social and professional classes' prejudices. Civil servants are said to be privileged yet as other-worldly as decadent aristocrats; as indolent and pig-headed as the petty bourgeoisie; as rule-obsessed as shop stewards and yet as workshy as any member of the underclass; narrow-minded and yet as sly as foxes (and for whom rules and regulations are Holy Writ); in thinking up nonsense they are as creative as the businessmen who cunningly engineer the needs which they claim to be meeting and, like immigrants, obsessed by the idea of procreating wildly at the taxpayer's expense. It is astonishing how successfully this artefact, this fictional construct haunts the collective imagination without ever falling apart in the light of reality. After all, everybody has actually met a civil servant whereas they haven't met, say, Dracula and, what is more, if you correlate the percentage of civil servants which make up the adult population with the average size of a family, then the statistics dictate that two out of every three people must have a father, uncle, aunt, sister, father-in-law or at least one close relation working in the civil service. There is no other profession with which over two thirds of the European population has such a close family relationship (the figures for Germany and Austria tally exactly with the statistical average). This is one of the great sociological conundrums: why this empirical fact and the practical experience it engenders do not dispel the surreal vision of civil servants which haunts the collective fantasy or at least bring it closer in line with reality. A Eurobarometer survey conducted in 2010 showed in fact that 72% of the interviewees had a “very negative” or “fairly negative” opinion of civil servants. But that's not the end of it: astonishingly enough, well over 60% also say that being a civil servant is “very desirable”. Civil servants are really a unique species in the fantasy world of society, being reviled and envied by almost everybody. Given the stubborn factuality of this absurd fiction, which, clearly, no practical experience has any chance of putting to rest, there is probably no point in reminding people of the historically important role of civil servants in erecting the standards of civilisation that we very much desire and claim for ourselves today, or, of the fact that, say, the civil service came into being at the same time as the culture of literacy, that it developed its standards, whose effects can still be felt today, at the time of the Enlightenment and that an enlightened civil service has, throughout long periods of European history marked by arbitrariness, war, unchecked crimes against humanity and unsuccessful revolutions, repeatedly upheld the minimum rule of law on which the European project is now building. However that is precisely the point: modern Europe, as we experience it and think about it today, looks like a monstrous civil service project, the basic form of which is rampant bureaucracy. Any discussion about Europe must therefore begin with an analysis of its civil servants. The “Brussels bureaucracy” is now the heading under which anything that triggers criticism, resentment, anger or contempt is repeatedly subsumed. The blame for this, that or anything else can ultimately be attributed to the civil servants sitting in their ivory towers who also enjoy enviable privileges for their other-worldly activities. Quite obviously, reality now has even less chance of correcting the fantasy, since the distant figures in Brussels have replaced national civil servants as the quintessential civil servants. At the same time, without this having yet dawned on the public, the definition of civil servants has changed fundamentally – “Brussels civil servants” are not only not what society perceives them to be but, at the same time and, in particular, they are not what they are conventionally defined as being. They no longer serve a public institution of their own State in a relationship of trust with that State but a supranational institution, such as the European Commission, whose job it is to curb individual States' own interests and ultimately to override the nation States, including those from which the civil servants themselves originate. “Brussels civil servants” strive to coordinate the common interests and communitise the framework conditions of, at the moment, 27 States and do so repeatedly against their own countries' governments and national bureaucracies. “Brussels bureaucrats” are therefore an historically entirely new type of civil servant - the first to have no commitment to their region or government and the first that themselves repeatedly challenge State bureaucracies and if necessary amend or annul their rules or decisions. That is exciting enough in itself and is, above all, an expression of great historical common sense, especially if we look at the devastation wrought by nationalism and the blind enforcement of “national interests”, to which the European unification project constitutes, of course, the historical response – but I only found that out when I moved to Brussels in order to get to know the civil servants in, as it were, the flesh. I had started work on a novel set in Brussels whose main character was a European Commission official. I was wondering whether it was still possible today to meet the enormous challenge which the novel as a literary genre has always set itself (in supposedly more ordered times), namely to track down the essence of the era in reality and to recount it through the medium of specific characters and their fates, i.e. conjure up the entire reality of an era in the doings of typical individuals. I thought that it would be best for me to go to the place where the reality of the rest of my life is being shaped, which today is undoubtedly Brussels. There, in the much-reviled “palaces of the bureaucracy” the conditions are being created which will really have an impact on our lives, wherever we are on this continent. I asked myself: Who are these bureaucrats, these new type of civil servants, for which a separate term was invented in order to distinguish them from traditional State civil servants, namely “eurocrats”? Have they got faces, can one stereotype them, what is their day-to-day life actually like, how do their decisions come into being? So I flew to Brussels, rented an apartment and tried to get to know as many eurocrats as possible during the subsequent weeks and months, talk to them, get them to tell me about their work and their life and, if possible (which it was) watch them at work. One surprise followed another, as if there were a secret agreement to confound all the clichés and stereotypes which generally exist of eurocrats by demonstrating their exact opposite in reality. The first surprise: the Commission is an open and transparent institution. Its doors were open and its officials willing to give me information. And if you do suddenly encounter a series of closed doors in the corridors of the Berlaymont building it is an exception because you are in the Directorate-General for Education and Culture (but that is another story). The second surprise: the Brussels bureaucracy is extremely lean. The EU has fewer officials to administer the entire continent than the City of Vienna alone. The third surprise: the Brussels bureaucracy is extremely thrifty and modest. The offices, even in the upper echelons of the hierarchy, are functional but no more. There is little comfort and no luxury. The fourth surprise: the Brussels bureaucracy is unbelievably cheap. The EU institutions have a budget amounting to 2% of European GDP to administer an entire continent and fulfill their entire mission. History has never seen anything like as large or bold a project which did not cost many times more than this. The fifth surprise: the officials have a sense of humour. I met very few people who were the desiccated fossils one imagines civil servants to be. Their work on the European project makes them see the characteristics of their respective national identities as quirks which they treat with self- deprecating irony. One could also say that a mentality only becomes a culture once it is freed from national obsession. Sometimes I saw in these people, whose practical example gave the lie to the fictitious image of an official, another fiction but a new one: in their practice, their work, their life plans they are already what we are supposed to become, namely genuine Europeans: polyglot, highly qualified, enlightened, rooted in the culture of their origins but freed from the irrationality of a so-called national identity. But perhaps that is not a fiction at all but the updated version of the enlightened absolutist bureaucracy. "Ah, I see" the educated EU critics will now reply: "was the phrase: “Everything for the public, nothing by the public” not the mission statement of the enlightened absolutist administration? Is that not exactly the same problem again? That civil servants want to decide what is best for the public without having any democratic legitimacy?" It makes no difference, they say, how well-meaning the Commission’s officials are when they come up with their directives – nobody has elected them and they simply have no legitimacy.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Fo Reign Rights Autumn 2020
    HANSER • HANSER BERLIN • HANSER KINDERBUCH •HANSERBLAU • ZSOLNAY HANSER LITERATURVERLAGE FOREIGN RIGHTS AUTUMN 2020 Impressum Cover: © Peter-Andreas Hassiepen Translation: Lucy Jones Design: Tessa Schlesinger Concept and compilation: Claudia Horzella Copyright: September 2020 Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH & Co. KG Vilshofener Straße 10 81679 München, Germany www.hanser-literaturverlage.de http://foreignrights.hanser.de FICTION LITERARY FICTION Dorothee Elmiger, Aus der Zuckerfabrik 2 Robert Seethaler, Der letzte Satz 4 Rolf Lappert, Leben ist ein unregelmäßiges Verb 6 Thilo Krause, Elbwärts 8 Irene Diwiak, Malvita 10 Lisa Eckhart, Omama 12 Ronya Othmann, Die Sommer 14 Karin Wieland • Heinz Bude • Bettina Munk, Aufprall 16 Daniel Glattauer, Die Liebe Geld 18 Elke Heidenreich, Männer in Kamelhaarmänteln 20 Verena Keßler, Die Gespenster von Demmin 22 Beatrix Kramlovsky, Fanny oder das weiße Land 24 Margrit Schriber, Die Vielgeliebte meines Mannes 26 CRIME FICTION / THRILLER Claude Cueni, Genesis 2.0 28 Holger Senzel, Später Zeuge 30 Leif Karpe, Der Mann, der in die Bilder fiel 32 ESSAY Mely Kiyak, Frausein 34 Karl-Markus Gauß, Die unaufhörliche Wanderung 36 Edi Zollinger, Herkules am Spinnrad 37 POETRY Oskar Pastior, »eine sanduhr für methapern« 38 FICTION Nominated for the Swiss Book Prize Shortlisted for Selected by the German New books Book Prize in German DOROTHEE ELMIGER »It is already clear that Out of the Sugar Factory will be one If the connections between world events should suddenly be wiped out, we would be of this year’s most grateful to find Dorothee Elmiger’s book to help us understand what happened in the important books. This past. Its subject: the cycles of capital, labour and lust.
    [Show full text]
  • Administrative Information
    51st meeting of the Implementation Group Brussels, 6th to 8th September 2021 ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION Dear Ladies and Gentlemen, Welcome to the 51st meeting of the Implementation Group, which will be organised by the European Security and Defence College (ESDC); the first one after the break out of the pandemic, which will take place in Brussels in a purely residential format. GENERAL INFORMATION Upon arrival you will be provided with a meeting folder and the final meeting programme. At the end of the meeting you will be provided with an official Confirmation of stay (for those who need it). The presentations will be available in pdf-format on http://emilyo.eu/node/1191 by the end of the 52nd IG meeting in Sofia. As far as the dress code is concerned, we recommend suit and tie. Active members of the armed forces and the police aren’t obliged to wear their uniforms. The can follow the general rule (suit and tie). PROGRAMME The meeting will be organised in a purely residential format respecting all the COVID-19 restrictions in force. This means that no VTC option is available. Meeting starts on Monday, 6th September 2021 at 16.00 and concludes on Wednesday, 8th September 2021 at 12.30. Tuesday session starts at 09.00 am and concludes at 18.00. Coffee breaks: up to the group Lunch breaks: 1 ½ hours. ACCOMMODATION ESDC doesn’t have any arrangements with hotels in Brussels and we don’t recommend anyone. However, you can find below a list of hotels used by our meetings / courses participants in the past: Silken Berlaymont Hotel First Euroflat Hotel (4 stars) just behind Berlaymont building Hotel Chelton (3 stars, close to ESDC, on Rue Veronesse, the closest) Holiday Inn Brussels Schuman (3 stars, on rue Breydel, close to metro Schuman).
    [Show full text]
  • Reviews Thinking Europe Politically Claudia Wiesner, University Of
    Reviews Th inking Europe politically Claudia Wiesner, University of Marburg Review of Robert Menasse, kursiivilla der Europäische Landbote, tavallisella Paul Zsolnay Verlag, Vienna 2012, ISBN 978-3-552-05616-9 My most pressing thoughts after having read Robert Menasse´s book were “Oh wow, this made me think!”, and: “why is it that a writer has written such a book and not an academic?” I believe that this latter aspect tells us something decisive about the state of the art of the debate on the future of democracy in the European Union, and also on the state of the art of the academic debate on this topic. Let me explain this further: I read Menasse´s book because I was invited to participate with the author in a public discussion on the topic of “Europe in Crisis”. As the state of democracy in the EU and its multilevel system is one of my main research fi elds, and also because I am a concerned pro-European, I accepted the invitation with pleasure, read the book, and took part in the discussion. What happened was not only that we had a very fruitful discussion, but also for the fi rst time in all of the interventions on the topic of democracy in the EU in which I have been involved over the last years. Th is time I was in the role of the sceptic, saying things like “we must see this in a more diff erentiated way…”. I had been expecting this, but I had still consid- ered myself an imaginative political scientist with a strong interest in the topic.
    [Show full text]
  • PROGRAMME Seminar for Trade Unions on the European Commission "Agenda for Jobs, Growth, Fairness and Democratic Change"
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Lirias PROGRAMME Seminar for Trade Unions on the European Commission "Agenda for jobs, growth, fairness and democratic change". Visit number: 405417 Brussels, 29 October (all day) 1 Error! No text of specified style in document. | Vno-P-291778-xx-yy CONFERENCE VENUES Visitors Centre of the European Commission Building "Charlemagne" Rue de la Loi 170 B - 1040 Brussels (Use main entrance – opposite Berlaymont building) Nearest metro station: Schuman (lines 1 and 5; exit "Berlaymont") Coaches can off-load or collect visitors on rue du Taciturne. Kindly note that, in order to avoid traffic congestion, double-parking is strictly prohibited on "rue de la Loi". 405417-EN Visit organiser Name Fabienne Timmermans Visitors Centre DG Communication Address European Commission B-1049 Brussels Tel +32 (0) 2 29 57689 E-mail [email protected] Contact number +32 (0) 2 29 99106 / 67297 assistant Accomodation: First Euroflat Hotel Boulevard Charlemagne 50 1000 Brussels Tel +32 (0) 2 230 00 10 (rooms have been upgraded to garden view) The visit is organized in cooperation with the DG ECFIN: Christian-Yves Krappitz, Communication manager Maxime Bouillard, Communication manager Visitors should ensure that they have their identity cards or passports with them at all times as they will be asked to show them when entering Commission buildings Number of 24 participants Arrival participants and transfer (by own means) to the hotel and/or conference venue Conference
    [Show full text]
  • Brussels, 25.6.2019 SWD(2019) 300 Final COMMISSION STAFF
    Europaudvalget 2019 KOM (2019) 0350 Offentligt EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 25.6.2019 SWD(2019) 300 final COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Internal audit engagements finalised by the Internal Audit Service in 2018 Accompanying the document Report from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the Court of Auditors Annual report to the Discharge Authority on internal audits carried out in 2018 {COM(2019) 350 final} EN EN Table of contents CONTENT OF THIS STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT ............................................................................................................................................4 Section 1 Final reports .....................................................................................................................................................................................................5 HORIZONTAL AUDITS ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................5 1. Audit on LIFE financial instruments: effectiveness and efficiency of the current framework in DGs CLIMA and ENV ...............................................................................................................................................................................................5 2. Limited review on the reporting on the corrective capacity in DGs AGRI, BUDG, DEVCO, EMPL, REGIO, RTD and EASME ..............................................................................................................................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • The European Commission, Nationality and Networks
    2 THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, NATIONALITY AND NETWORKS Before going into the theoretical building blocks of studying the networks of European Commission officials, it is necessary to place the central variables of this thesis, nationality and networks, empirically into the organisational con- text of the European Commission. This description of the organisational struc- ture and composition aims to set the stage for the subsequent discussion of why nationality matters in the Commission and how networks may affect pol- icy-making. This portrayal is primarily based on official Commission docu- ments and the existing literature on the Commission. 2.1 The Organisational Structure and Composition of the Commission The term European Commission refers to both the political and administrative branches of this organisation. The political wing is the College of Commission- ers, composed of one Commissioner per Member State – each assigned a policy portfolio for a period of five years. The President of the Commission has the primary responsibility of providing political guidance to the College. The Commissioners are assisted by their Cabinets in performing their tasks. The power of decision-making belongs to this political level of the Commission, whereas the Commission bureaucracy is responsible for preparing, managing and implementing the decisions of the College. The division of power between the political and bureaucratic level of the Commission is, however, not as clear-cut and simple as it seems. This has been a heated issue for debate when Commissioner Günter Verheugen complained of the power of Commission bureaucrats saying that “The Commissioners have to take extreme care that important questions are decided in their weekly 13 CHAPTER 2 meeting and not decided by the civil servants among themselves.”12 Commis- sioner Danita Hübner followed suit by arguing that Commissioners must be careful not to lose grip of things with the influence of the Commission’s civil servants on the rise.
    [Show full text]
  • (Salle Jean Rey). the Berlaymont Is Clearly Visible from the Schuman Roundabout
    PRACTICAL ARRANGEMENTS THE CONFERENCE VENUE (I.E. THE BERLAYMONT), THE HOTEL (I.E. THE SILKEN BERLAYMONT) AND THE RESTAURANT FOR FRIDAY NIGHT (I.E. L'ATELIER) ARE ALL LOCATED CLOSE TO EACH OTHER IN THE SCHUMAN AREA OF BRUSSELS AND WITHIN 5 MINUTES WALKING DISTANCE OF THE SCHUMAN ROUNDABOUT (ROND POINT SCHUMAN / SCHUMANPLEIN) CONFERENCE VENUE : The conference takes place in the European Commission's Berlaymont building (Salle Jean Rey). The Berlaymont is clearly visible from the Schuman roundabout. On the first day of the conference, please bring a copy of the invitation e-mail sent to you, as well as a passport or identity card, in order to meet the security requirements needed to gain entry to the Berlaymont building. Once inside the building, someone will be waiting for you with directions as to how to get to the Jean Rey meeting room where the conference will take place. ADDRESS : 200 Rue de la Loi / Wetstraat – 1000 Brussels HOW TO GET TO THE CONFERENCE VENUE 1 1. From Brussels-National Airport: . Licensed taxis are available outside the Arrivals hall. The fare should cost around €40-€45. Airport line: take the No.12 bus (or No. 21 after 20:00 or on weekends) to “Schuman”, a two-minute walk from the venue. It leaves three times an hour from the Bus Station on the level below Arrivals. The journey should take around 30 minutes and cost €5 if the ticket is bought on board (€3 if bought in advance). Trains leave the station on Level -1 of the airport four times an hour.
    [Show full text]
  • Holocaust Postmemory, Subjunctivity and Futurity in Katja Petrowskaja’S Vielleicht
    Forum for Modern Language Studies Vol. 56,No.4,doi:10.1093/fmls/cqaa026 Advance Access Publication 23 October 2020 MOMENTS OF POSSIBILITY: HOLOCAUST POSTMEMORY, SUBJUNCTIVITY AND FUTURITY IN KATJA PETROWSKAJA’S VIELLEICHT ESTHER (2014) AND ROBERT Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/fmls/article/56/4/406/5937248 by guest on 28 September 2021 MENASSE’S DIE HAUPTSTADT (2017) MARIA ROCA LIZARAZU ABSTRACT This article examines subjunctive approaches to history and memory as a novel aesthetic and ethical mode of Holocaust (post-)memory in two promi- nent examples of contemporary German-Jewish fiction. I argue that Katja Petrowskaja’s Vielleicht Esther (2014) and Robert Menasse’s Die Hauptstadt (2017) develop subjunctive modes of Holocaust (post-)memory as a response to a crisis of witnessing in the post-survivor era. Faced with the dying out of the survivor generation and the increasing institutionalization and hyperme- diation of Holocaust memories, these two authors invoke the subjunctive to self-reflexively account for their historical positionality and critique mono- lithic memory discourses (Petrowskaja), while also aiming to (re-)invest a stagnant culture of Holocaust memory with political urgency and futurity (Menasse). Subjunctivity thus emerges as a central yet underexamined mode of contemporary German-Jewish writing which has the potential to trans- form wider cultures of Holocaust (post-)memory, by moving ‘beyond the traumatic’ (Rigney 2018)inthedirectionoffuturity. Keywords: subjunctive remembering; Holocaust literature; German-Jewish
    [Show full text]
  • Energy Certification of Berlaymont
    Energy Certification of Berlaymont Summary Report on project results July 2005 The Berlaymont Building The Berlaymont was built in the 1960s to house the headquarters of the European Commission. The building was originally designed by architect Lucien de Vestel, in cooperation with fellow architects Jean Gilson and André Polak. They created an imposing, cross-shaped building, with a central hub and four wings of different sizes radiating out from it. It is a large building, containing over 240 000 m2 of floor space on 16 levels. The structure was so technologically advanced for its time as to be considered revolutionary: the superstructure was suspended by steel braces from preflex prestressed beams resting on a reinforced concrete core. The Berlaymont complex provided office space for 3 000 Commission staff and also contained rooms for meetings and conferences, a cafeteria, a restaurant, TV studios, shops, store-rooms and parking space for some 1 600 cars. A number of underground connections linked the building to nearby road tunnels, the metro and the railway station. The first European civil servants moved in 1967 and the building was occupied until 1991. Over time, the building and its fittings came to show their age and no longer met the occupants’ requirements. By 1991, it became clear that major works were needed to remove the large quantities of asbestos that were present in the building and the decision was made to go ahead with a full-scale renovation aiming at: • Creating a sober and functional building that projects an image
    [Show full text]
  • Elena Kaliberda, M.A. (EURUS)
    Narrative Report Graduate Travel-Research Fellowships on the European Union, European Integration or EU-Canada Relations 2014 Elena Kaliberda M.A. Student, Institute of European, Russian and Eurasian Studies Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada With the generous help of the Graduate Travel-Research Fellowship on the European Union, I was able to complete my field work in Brussels (Belgium), Paris and Lyon (France) in the period from May 24th until June 2nd, 2014. The goal of my research project is to examine the role of two media networks with European agenda in the development of the European public sphere (EURANET radio network and Euronews television). As a result of the field trip, I conducted eleven research interviews with representatives of two transnational media networks with European agenda - EURANET and Euronews, the European Commission, journalists of European media. Being in Brussels, Paris and Lyon also allowed me to attend and to participate in routine activities of editorial offices of EURANET and Euronews. I attended: RTBF broadcasting corporation – member of EURANET network in Belgium, Brussels; EURANET Plus News Agency in Brussels; EURANET and Euronews studios in the European Parliament on the Elections Night; EURANET Plus headquarter in Paris; Euronews headquarter in Lyon/Ecully. I spent one working day in the Euronews’ News Room and took part in the morning briefing of news brigade. On May 25-26 in Brussels, I got a valuable and unique experience attending the Elections Night in the European Parliament and taking part in the Mondays’ press-conference of the European Commission in Berlaymont building press-centre. I could get the first-hand information on the results of the European Parliament Elections 2014 and understanding of the process of releasing information by the EU institutions to European media.
    [Show full text]
  • Robert Menasse's Novel Die Hauptstadt
    Seminar: The Road to Brexit: British Discourses of Europe Lecturer: Prof. Dr. Ina Habermann Podcast Contribution, Author: Stefan Bongers Novel: Robert Menasse: Die Hauptstadt. [Translation by Jamie Bulloch]. Berlin, Suhrkamp 2017. Great Britain and the EU from a European Perspective – Robert Menasse’s Novel Die Hauptstadt Author: Robert Menasse’s Die Hauptstadt — The Capital — which won the German Book Prize in 2017, is a major novel about the European Union. Events, fittingly set for the most part in Brussels, revolve around an ill-fated jubilee project. A Public Relations campaign has been set up to celebrate the 50th anniversary of the European Commission, designed to increase the reputation of this institution with the public. Significantly, in this context, the jubilee is in fact the brainchild of a British official, Mrs Atkinson, newly appointed director-general of the directorate General Communication of the European Commission. Atkinson studied marketing and management at the European Business School in London and got her position because of the female quota: Speaker: “She herself had benefited from the policy, and – as she said – she could openly admit this without putting in question her qualification for the job.“ Author: Atkinson was preferred over her British rival, George Morland, who is unable to cope with the fact that a woman got the position he was aiming for. He tells everybody that Atkinson is the perfect example for the idiocy of the quota and that she Speaker: “ (…) was such a cold woman that she suffered from freezing hands, which was why she always sat at her desk wearing an enormous muff.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    1 INTRODUCTION 2 3 INTRODUCTION "Civil Protection in a Changing Risk Landscape" The European Civil Protection Forum is the largest recurring public event on European cooperation in the field of civil protection. Since 2003, the conference has brought together the European civil protection community to take stock of achievements, share lessons learnt, and put forward new ideas for tackling common challenges. The conference is also an important tool for strengthening cooperation with Europe’s Neighbourhood and other international partners. Hosted by the European Commission in Brussels, over the past fifteen years “the Forum” has been at the heart of the European policy discussion on civil protection and plugged into the international consensus on disaster risk management and resilience. The 2018 edition takes place at a particularly critical time for reflecting collectively on the current and future role of the Union Civil Protection Mechanism (UCPM), the European framework for cooperation among civil protection authorities. At the end of 2017, the European Commission adopted a new legislative proposal, currently being discussed with the Council and the European Parliament, with a view to strengthen the UCPM by boosting financial support to the existing voluntary pool, by establishing a dedicated reserve of operational capacities at Union level (rescEU) as well as reinforced preparedness and prevention measures. INTRODUCTION 4 The objectives of the European Civil Protection Forum 2018 are to: (i) provide a platform for discussion with stakeholders on pressing policy questions which are likely to shape the future development of the UCPM (ii) serve as a sounding board for new ideas and developments in the sphere of civil protection and disaster risk management, including cooperation at EU level and with neighbouring countries beyond 2020 (iii) facilitate networking, mutual learning and cooperation within the European civil protection community.
    [Show full text]