Exploring the Influence of Honor-Based Norms and Values On

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Exploring the Influence of Honor-Based Norms and Values On Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2013 Causes and consequences of conflict : exploring the influence of honor-based norms and values on the experience of intimate partner violence in the United States Michelle Elaine Pence Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Communication Commons Recommended Citation Pence, Michelle Elaine, "Causes and consequences of conflict : exploring the influence of honor-based norms and values on the experience of intimate partner violence in the United States" (2013). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 613. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/613 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF CONFLICT: EXPLORING THE INFLUENCE OF HONOR-BASED NORMS AND VALUES ON THE EXPERIENCE OF INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE IN THE UNITED STATES A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Communication Studies by Michelle E. Pence B.A., University of Missouri- Kansas City, 2005 M.A., University of Missouri- St. Louis, 2007 August 2013 I don't know where Fathers go when they die. I have an idea that after a rest-wherever it is- he won't be happy unless there's work to do. He won't just sit on a cloud and wait for the woman he loved and the children she bore. He'll be busy there, too, repairing the streets, oiling the gates, improving things. Smoothing the way. ~ Anon. I dedicate the completion of my doctorate to my grandfather, Tom Smith, who died on October 9, 2011, just a year and a half short of seeing me complete my education. My grandfather, who remains the hardest working person I’ve ever met, was a stoic man who took pride in his family, his city (Kansas City, Missouri), and his service to this country during World War II. He was also proud of me and my education, and was indeed one of my biggest fans. He deserves my thanks as well as this dedication, because in the midst of my traversing through “the dark side,” I knew the “light” through his example of what a good man is and does. I miss him constantly and hope he will always be proud of me. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS There is absolutely no way I could have made it to this point, completing my dissertation, without support. To all the people that have been in my corner, I owe my deepest thanks. First and foremost, to my committee, James Honeycutt, Graham Bodie, and James Garand. You have no idea what it means to me that you never gave up on me; never quit. Your hard work and dedication were shining examples for me along this journey, and I will be eternally grateful. There are members of my family which deserve special mention. To my sister, Melinda. In the hardest times, you were the person who made my escapes possible. Without your support, I would not have been able to have the good experiences and create the positive memories that kept me afloat throughout these last several years. Truly, if anyone is responsible for my sanity and grace, it is you. Thank you is simply not enough. To my parents, Gary and Kathleen Pence. Thank you for supporting me after I took the fellowship; I could not have stayed in my home without your help. That stability was probably the only way I was able to finish this project in a year. And to my mom- my “friends” thank you also! Dissertation writing has been a busy time for them, also! To my cousins, Patrick, Lisa, Courtney, and Chris- your humor, compassion, enthusiasm, and support put a smile on my face. Thank you for the memories. There have been a handful of friends who have been there for all of it, my youth, my struggles, and now my achievement. To my best friend and savior, Mark Boyer. You saw potential in me at fourteen years old, and you never lost faith in me, even when I lost faith in myself. I will never understand why I get to be the luckiest girl in the entire world, to have you as a devoted best friend. If I go forward from here and live my life with half the humor, grace, and integrity that you have, I will be truly accomplished. To my dearest, oldest friends- Jaime Kunce and Sarah Rastogi. Thank you for being loyal. I truly love you both—thank you for iii always standing behind my decisions. Get ready, it’s my turn to repay visits! And finally, to Rocky Sluder- thank you for calling me every single Saturday night. I should have answered more often, but know what it meant to me to just see your call and know I have a loyal friend. There are several people I met during my time in Baton Rouge who became my soundboards, the sources of my sanity. First, to Donna and Lisa- you both know I would have been lost without you! Second, to Danielle McGeough, Ryan McGeough, Michael Sanders, Rya Butterfield, and Marina Cohen. I spent four years under an incredible amount of stress and hundreds of miles from friends or family. You became my surrogate family, loyal and kind and forgiving. Thank you for supporting me throughout this last stage of my education. And to Megan Cunningham: Thank you for showing me what true strength looks like, and keeping me inspired on this journey. There are a few people who I’ve come across while on this amazing journey who deserve my many thanks. To Jon Distel- you are my most interesting man in the world! Thank you for always believing in me, for making me feel smart enough to do this but interesting enough to stand out from the others that do. To Kami Silk- thank you always reassuring me, for helping me maintain some level of sanity! To James “Pepper” Rutland: No one knows everything that I went through in these last six months- except you. For better or worse, it was you who got the unfiltered, uncensored, unapologetic, most real and raw side of me. Thank you for that freedom, and for taking an eccentric, tattooed, and emotional girl and making her feel like she was the one worth a million bucks. Your strength, character, and generosity continue to humble me. Finally, to N.N., M.B., and J.R.: “We are the choices that we have made and our lives remain forever changed by those who would move us closer to a greater truth.” Thank you for the truth, past, present, and future. iv TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS……...……………………………………………….………………iii LIST OF TABLES………………………………………………………………………………..vi ABSTRACT……..………………………………………………………………........................vii CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION………………………...…………....……………………...1 CHAPTER TWO: REVIEW OF LITERATURE...…………….……………….……......... ……14 CHAPTER THREE: STUDY 1………………….………………………..…………..................40 CHAPTER FOUR: STUDY 2…………….……...……………..….……………………........…48 CHAPTER FIVE: STUDY 3……………...….……………………………….....………………78 CHAPTER SIX: SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS……………...….………………..........100 REFERENCES……………………………………………………………………....................115 APPENDIX A: CONFLICT TACTICS SCALE...…………………………..…………………131 APPENDIX B: PROXIMAL ANTECEDENTS TO VIOLENT EPISODES (PAVE)……. ….134 APPENDIX C: REASONS FOR VIOLENCE SCALE (RVS)...……...…………….…….......135 APPENDIX D: MOTIVATIONS AND EFFECTS QUESTIONNAIRE (MEQ)...……….. .....137 APPENDIX E: PROPOSED MEASURE...…………………………………………….……...139 APPENDIX F: RESULTS OF CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSES, STUDY 3…......149 APPENDIX G: IRB APPROVAL…………………………………………………………...…150 THE VITA……………...………………………………………………………………………152 v LIST OF TABLES 2.1 United States Census-Designated Regions and Divisions…...………………………… ……16 2.2 List of states from most peaceful (1) to least peaceful (50), U.S.P.I...…….................... ……18 2.3 List of 10 most and 10 least peaceful metropolitan areas, U.S.P.I…..………………… ……19 2.4 Hypotheses…………………………………………….…..…………………………… ……38 3.1 Mean rates of male-on-female, single victim/single offender homicides 1998-2009..... ……44 3.2 Results of fixed effects regression analysis, states ...…….…………….……………… ……45 3.3 Results of fixed effects regression analysis, regions.…...……..………......................... ……46 4.1 Items to assess provoked IPV……..…….……………………………………………...........59 4.2 Items to assess IPV for control………………………………………………………............60 4.3 Items to assess IPV related to character/personality of perpetrator and/or victim…………..61 4.4 Factor loadings, CTS2, Self-as-Perpetrator……………….…………….…...………………70 4.5 Factor loadings, CTS2, Self-as-Victim………………….…………...…........................ ……73 5.1 Characteristics of participants in Study 3…………………..………………...... ……………82 5.2 Five models of honor/nonhonor culture classification techniques.……….…………… ……86 5.3 Attributions and rates of endorsement ………………….......….………........................ ……88 5.4 Results for Models 1-5, Hypothesis 6…………..……….......….………........................ ……90 5.5 Fit indices……………………….……………………………………………………… ……91 5.6 Results from ordered logistic regression models with interaction effect………………. ……95 5.7 Fit indices…….………………………………………………………………………… ……95 5.8 Marginal effects………………………………………………………………………... ……97 6.1 Hypotheses and results…………………………………………………………………. …..102 vi ABSTRACT The three studies in this dissertation were posed with the common goal of revealing possible explanations for variations in the causes and consequences of interpersonal violence across regional cultures of the United States. Study 1 posed and tested two hypotheses related to the distribution of male-perpetrated intimate partner homicide across regions of the United States. The South and West, two regions characterized in full (the South) or in part (the West) by honor cultures, emerged as the regions with the highest rates of argument- and conflict- related, male-on-female intimate partner homicides in single victim/single offender incidents. Explanations provided at the individual level for cross-regional variation in the experience of severe intimate partner violence were explored in Studies 2 and 3, which had two goals.
Recommended publications
  • UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Association between Intimate Partner Violence and HIV Infection among Married Indian Women in Theni District, Tamil Nadu, India Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7xm426wd Author Thirumalai, Dhanalakshmi Publication Date 2017 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Association between Intimate Partner Violence and HIV Infection among Married Indian Women in Theni District, Tamil Nadu, India A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Epidemiology by Dhanalakshmi Thirumalai 2017 © Copyright by Dhanalakshmi Thirumalai 2017 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Association between Intimate Partner Violence and HIV Infection among Married Indian Women in Theni District, Tamil Nadu, India by Dhanalakshmi Thirumalai Doctor of Philosophy in Epidemiology University of California, Los Angeles, 2017 Professor Roger Detels, Chair The prevalence of HIV infection among women in India is on the rise accounting for nearly 40% of all HIV infections in the country. This calls for further investigation since the majority of women at risk for HIV live in a monogamous marital relationship with no risk factors of their own. Intimate partner violence against women not only increases their risk of acquiring HIV infection, it also diminishes their ability to protect from HIV, and thwarts their access to care. Hence, we investigated the association between HIV and IPV among married Indian women who were currently living with their husbands. We conducted a case control cross-sectional study in Theni district of Tamil Nadu in South India.
    [Show full text]
  • Measuring Intimate Partner Violence Technical Brief >> JULY 2017 Authors: Lori Heise and Mazeda Hossain
    Measuring intimate partner violence TEchnIcal BrIEf >> JUlY 2017 Authors: lori heise and Mazeda hossain This brief provides guidance for the non-expert on Data available to fully articulate the relationship between how to collect valid quantitative data on partner violence and the uptake and use of services and prevention violence in an ethically and methodologically sound and treatment options are still relatively sparse. However, investigators could learn much by regularly including questions manner. Specifically, it addresses: on violence in their on-going research. • Definitions Indeed, an ever-widening array of researchers have expressed • Ethical and safety obligations (informed consent, interest in collecting data on women’s experience of violence. privacy) Generally, such studies are designed to serve other ends: • Methods for increasing disclosure among evaluating the effectiveness of an intervention, exploring research participants factors that predict women’s access to and control over income or monitoring clinical trials for social harms. • Minimum items necessary for measuring intimate Regardless of the study’s main purpose, the fields of violence partner violence prevention, international development and global health would • Defining IPV as an outcome or exposure variable greatly benefit if researchers from other disciplines could, reliably and ethically, insert questions on violence – as either a potential explanatory variable or an outcome of interest Gender-based violence – including physical, sexual, emotional – into their quantitative surveys. This brief is intended as a and economic violence and abuse – is widespread globally. contribution towards this end. The most pervasive form of gender-based violence is intimate partner violence (IPV), also known as domestic violence or partner/spouse abuse.
    [Show full text]
  • RESEARCH REVIEW CURRENT RESEARCH for FAMILY ADVOCACY PROGRAMS • Volume 3, Issue 1 • Winter 2018
    Family Advocacy Research Digests RESEARCH REVIEW CURRENT RESEARCH FOR FAMILY ADVOCACY PROGRAMS • Volume 3, Issue 1 • Winter 2018 In this Issue Research Review (RR) is a publication of the Joining Forces Joining Families group. RR consists of summaries of family maltreatment research for family advocacy, medical, and social service provid- ers. These summaries provide tips on issues not commonly encountered and innovations for research and practice. We present four summaries on intimate partner violence (IPV) including a discussion on measuring IPV, on coercive control, and on infidelity. Six child maltreatment articles summarize common risks for maltreatment. Among these are economic hardships, inattentive parenting prac- tices, injuries and deaths with firearms, and suicides associated with bullying and emotional abuse. Finally, we describe a long-term study of home visiting in which child maltreatment was reduced partially due to improvements in mothers’ life course trajectory. INTIMATE PARTNER VIOLENCE How Do People Argue? The Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS) is One Measure of Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) The CTS (Straus, 1979) and a later version, the CTS-2 wives is approximately equal, a concept referred to as gender (Straus, Hamby, Boney-McCoy, & Sugarman, 1996), are symmetry (Dobash, Dobash, Wilson, & Daly, 1992). The CTS- standardized instruments that are widely used in research 2 was an attempt to respond to criticisms of the CTS. The and practice to evaluate how couples attempt to resolve CTS-2 has 39 items for each respondent for a total of 78 items conflicts. The CTS consists of 19 items involving three scales: comprising the following scales: negotiation, psychological reasoning, verbal aggression, and physical assault.
    [Show full text]
  • Intimate Partner Violence in Rwanda: the Mental Health of Victims and Perpetrators
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Measures and outcomes of a psychosocial group approach in Rwanda Verduin, F. Publication date 2013 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Verduin, F. (2013). Measures and outcomes of a psychosocial group approach in Rwanda. General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:26 Sep 2021 Chapter 6 intiMate partner violence in rwanda: the Mental health of victiMs and perpetrators Femke Verduin Esther AN Engelhard Theoneste Rutayisire Karien Stronks Willem F Scholte Journal of interpersonal violence 2013 28(9): 1839-58 96 Abstract Exposure to intimate partner violence (IPV) is a common feature of women living in low and middle-income countries. Several studies have shown a significant association between IPV against women and mental health in both developed and in low and mid- dle-income countries.
    [Show full text]
  • Moore, David; Runyan, Desmond Identification of Child
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 411 251 TM 027 183 AUTHOR Straus, Murray A.; Hamby, Sherry L.; Finkelhor, Daniv; Moore, David; Runyan, Desmond TITLE Identification of Child Maltreatment with the Parent-Child Conflict Tactics Scales: Development & Psychometric Data for a National Sample of American Parents. SPONS AGENCY New Hampshire Univ., Durham.; National Inst. of Mental Health (DHHS), Bethesda, MD. PUB DATE 1997-03-00 NOTE 27p.; Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Chicago, IL, March 24-28, 1997) . CONTRACT T32MH15161 PUB TYPE Reports Descriptive (141) Speeches/Meeting Papers (150) Tests/Questionnaires (160) EDRS PRICE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Aggression; *Child Abuse; Conflict; Data Collection; Emotional Abuse; *Identification; *Incidence; *Parent Child Relationship; Parents; Psychometrics; Test Construction; Test Reliability; *Test Use; Test Validity; Violence IDENTIFIERS *Conflict Tactics Scale ABSTRACT The Parent-Child Conflict Tactics Scales (CTSPC), a version of the well-established Conflict Tactics Scales, was developed to improve its ability to obtain data on physical and psychological child maltreatment. The conceptual and methodological approaches used to develop the CTSPC are described and psychometric data, including reliability, validity, and normative data, are presented based on a nationally representative sample of 1,000 U.S. parents. The Psychological Aggression and Physical Assault scales of the original version were revised to:(1) improve clarity and age-appropriateness;(2) add items to increase content validity; and (3) better differentiate among levels of severity of aggression by parents. A supplementary scale has been added to address child neglect. Reliability ranges from 0 for the severe physical assault subscale to 0.70 for the nonviolent discipline subscale.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Motivations for Men and Women's Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration
    #10 Motivations for Men and Women’s Intimate Partner Violence Perpetration: A Comprehensive Review1 Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling, Adrianne McCullars, & Tiffany Misra Full article available in Partner Abuse, Volume 3, Issue 4, 2012. The current review addresses two central questions: 1) What motivates partners to perpetrate IPV and 2) Whether such motivations differ between men and women? Delineating whether there are gender differences in motivations for perpetrating IPV has important clinical and policy implications. Specifically, if men’s violence is enacted in order to subjugate women and keep them in a position of vulnerability and disempowerment, then the treatment of men’s violence will best be understood in the context of societal inequities for women. Correspondingly, if women’s violence is primarily enacted out of self-defense in response to their male partner’s violence, they should not be considered “husband batterers”. Furthermore, they are unlikely to benefit from being mandated to abuser/batterer treatment programs that were designed specifically for men. On the other hand, if both men’s and women’s violence is motivated by anger management concerns, lack of skills to communicate successfully with intimate partners, or because of jealousy perhaps resulting from an inability to securely attach to one’s partner, different types of IPV interventions are likely to be necessary and these interventions may not need to be so gender-specific. Instead, less gender-specific interventions that take into account these latter types of motivations for violence may need to address perpetrator-specific psychological issues as well as relationship-specific concerns. We collected and summarized all available papers that report empirical data related to men’s and women’s motivations for IPV (n = 73 empirical studies; n = 1 book chapter; 75 total samples).
    [Show full text]
  • Data-Driven Identification of Subtypes of Intimate Partner Violence
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Data‑driven identifcation of subtypes of intimate partner violence Ahmet Mert Hacıaliefendioğlu1, Serhan Yılmaz1, Douglas Smith3, Jason Whiting4, Mehmet Koyutürk1,2 & Günnur Karakurt3,5,6* Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a complex problem with multiple layers of heterogeneity. We took a data‑driven approach to characterize this heterogeneity. We integrated data from diferent studies, representing 640 individuals from various backgrounds. We used hierarchical clustering to systematically group cases in terms of their similarities according to violence variables. Results suggested that the cases can be clustered into 12 hierarchically organized subgroups, with verbal abuse and negotiation being the main discriminatory factors at higher levels. The presence of physical assault, injury, and sexual coercion was discriminative at lower levels of the hierarchy. Subgroups also exhibited signifcant diferences in terms of relationship dynamics and individual factors. This study represents an attempt toward using integrative data analysis to understand the etiology of violence. These results can be useful in informing treatment eforts. The integrative data analysis framework we develop can also be applied to various other problems. Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a highly complex and multi-faceted problem. It includes the broad range of acts that can be physical, emotional, and sexual in nature1–3. IPV includes intentions to control, subdue, punish, or isolate someone by utilizing tactics such as manipulation, humiliation, or fear 4 along with physically forced or coerced sexual acts or attempts to obtain a sexual act through pressure5. Te presence of physical and non- physical forms of violence can be highly related1. Violent behaviors vary by severity, mutuality, and the generality of violence2,6,7.
    [Show full text]
  • Domestic Violence Measurement in the Demographic and Health Surveys: the History and the Challenges
    pdfMachine by Broadgun Software - a great PDF writer! - a great PDF creator! - http://www.pdfmachine.com http://www.broadgun.com "Violence against women: a statistical overview, challenges and gaps in data collection and methodology and approaches for overcoming them" Expert Group Meeting Organized by: UN Division for the Advancement of Women in collaboration with: Economic Commission for Europe (ECE) and World Health Organization (WHO) 11 – 14 April, 2005 Geneva Switzerland Domestic violence measurement in the demographic and health surveys: The history and the challenges Expert paper prepared by: Sunita Kishor, Ph.D 1 MEASURE DHS, ORC Macro Within the past 30 years, the international community has become increasingly aware of the importance of women’s gendered social and health status in relation to key demographic and health outcomes. Violence against women became a key issue in this regard, and early research on the relationship between violence against women and reproductive health in the developing world (Heise, Moore and Toubia, 1995; Heise, 1993) contributed to a deeper awareness of the problem and the adverse health outcomes associated with it. Acceptance of gender-based violence as a threat to women’s health and human rights was formalized when 189 governments signed on to the Platform for Action of the 1995 United Nations’ Beijing World Conference on Women. This Platform of Action explicitly recognizes that violence against women creates an obstacle to the achievement of the objectives of equality, development and peace at the national level and violates the human rights of women at the individual level. It further recognized that the lack of data and statistics on the incidence of violence against women makes the elaboration of programs and monitoring of changes difficult (United Nations, 1995a).
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS)
    Page 1 of 3 Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS) Title: Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS) Author: Straus, M.A., Hamby, S.L., Boney-McCoy, S., Sugarman, D.B., Finkelhor, D., Moore, D.W., & Runyan, D.K. Date: 1973, 1998 Constructs: Family Relationships, Child and Family Health Standardized: No Instrument Parent report (i.e., self-administered) or direct parent assessment (i.e., administration Type(s): in person or over the telephone) Uses of The CTS have been used to evaluate violence within families and intimate Information: relationships. The CTS have been recognized as the standard survey tool for assessing domestic violence. The CTS meet the practical needs of family therapists, social workers, and other mental health professionals and can be easily added to standard intake procedures. Environment: Not specified. Description: The Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS) have been used for decades to evaluate violence within families and intimate relationships. The widespread use of these scales has resulted in a proliferation of adapted forms and some confusion about their clinical and research application. The handbook on the CTS, available from the publisher, Western Psychological Services, clarifies the situation by compiling and organizing, in a single source, the large body of information about the CTS. In addition, the handbook presents two updated versions of the instrument that serve as standard forms, namely, the Conflict Tactics Scale (CTS 2) and the Conflict Tactics Scale: Parent-Child Version (CTS PC). The CTS 2 brings the instrument up-to-date by correcting the psychometric shortcomings of the original. It is the recommended form for assessing partner violence. The CTS PC is the recommended form for evaluating child maltreatment and parent-to-child violence.
    [Show full text]
  • Running Head: STALKING VIOLENCE RISK FACTORS 1 Risk Factors For
    View metadata, citationBendlin, and M. similarand Sheridan, papers atL. core.ac.uk2019. Risk Factors for Severe Violence in Intimate Partner Stalking Situations: An Analysis ofbrought to you by CORE Police Records. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. [In Press] provided by espace@Curtin Running head: STALKING VIOLENCE RISK FACTORS 1 Risk Factors for Severe Violence in Intimate Partner Stalking Situations: An Analysis of Police Records Martyna Bendlin School of Psychology, Curtin University, Western Australia, Australia & Lorraine Sheridan, Ph.D. School of Psychology, Curtin University, Western Australia, Australia Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to Martyna Bendlin, Curtin University, School of Psychology, PO Box U1987, Bentley, Western Australia 6845. Email: [email protected]. Running head: STALKING VIOLENCE RISK FACTORS 2 Risk Factors for Severe Violence in Intimate Partner Stalking Situations: An Analysis of Police Records Abstract Stalkers can be violent, and empirical studies have sought to identify factors associated with violence perpetrated by the stalker. Most of these works view physical violence as a homogenous construct, and do not differentiate between moderate and severe violence. The present study aims to identify correlates of non-violent, moderate, and severe physical violence within an archival sample of 369 domestically violent police incident reports, where stalking behavior was indicated. The incident reports utilized in this study occurred between 2013 and 2017, among intimate or ex-intimate partners. The present study explored twelve independent variables that have yielded mixed findings in previous stalking violence literature, as well as two previously untested factors of non-fatal strangulation and child contact. The police records were coded for severity of physical violence using the Revised Conflict Tactics Scale, and analysed using a Logistic Regression.
    [Show full text]
  • The Revised Conflict Tactics Scales
    THE REVISED CONFLICT TACTICS SCALES: ONE SIZE DOES NOT FIT ALL By BLANCA IDALIA CARO A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY Department of Educational Leadership, Sport Studies, & Educational/Counseling Psychology JULY 2017 © Copyright by BLANCA IDALIA CARO, 2017 All Rights Reserved © Copyright by BLANCA IDALIA CARO, 2017 All Rights Reserved To the Faculty of Washington State University: The members of the Committee appointed to examine the dissertation of BLANCA IDALIA CARO find it satisfactory and recommend that it be accepted. ___________________________________________ Phyllis Erdman, Ph.D., Chair ___________________________________________ Jennifer Lebeau, Ph.D. ___________________________________________ Pamela Bettis, Ph.D. ___________________________________________ Kira Carbonneau, Ph.D. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT First and foremost, I want to thank every person who has helped me throughout this long and arduous journey. I feel grateful to have been guided, supported, and mentored by strong women who encouraged me to actualize my potential. This includes my friends who have supported me through rough patches in this journey. I want to thank you all for helping me grow and persevere. Gracias papa (Thanks dad), for all the support you provided from afar throughout my graduate career. Thank you for listening, for the words of encouragement, and for supporting me through every step of this journey. I still remember being 12 or 13 and riding in the car with you as we drove past Angelo State University. You pointed at the university and told me “¡Algún día vas a estudiar allí!” (One day, you’ll study there!). I have always felt that you believed I could do anything that I set my mind to — you also held me accountable when I began to doubt myself.
    [Show full text]
  • CONFLICT TACTICS SCALE.Htm
    CHIPTS - Sexual Risks Scale - Perceived Susceptibility http://chipts.cch.ucla.edu/assessment/IB/List_Scales/CONFLICT TACTICS SCALE.htm Conflict Tactics Scale Keywords: Parental Communication, Physical Abuse, Parent Attitudes, Child Discipline, Punishment, Emotional Abuse, Family Relations. Background: The Conflict Tactics Scale measure consists of 80 items developed by Straus (1979) to explore intrafamily conflict and violence, focusing particularly on the adults in the family. Of these 80 items, 20 are administered to the parent about his/her relationship with the child. The next 20 questions are directed to the parent about the partner and his/her interactions with the child. If there is no partner, these questions are not asked. The last 40 questions of the measure address the interactions between the parent and the parent's partner using the same questions. The measure assesses how the parent reacts in a conflict with the child, such as trying to discuss an issue calmly, yelling at or insulting the child, stomping out of the room or house, threatening to spank the child, and hitting or trying to hit the child. The items gradually become more coercive and aggressive as they progress. The items are rated on a seven-point scale, ranging from 0=never to 6=almost every day. This instrument has four scales: Parent-Child (Scale 1), Partner-Child (Scale 2), Parent-Partner (Scale 3), and Partner-Parent (Scale 4). The parent-child and partner-child conflict scales each have five subscales and the two parent-partner scales have four subscales each. The standard instructions for the CTS ask what happened in the previous year.
    [Show full text]