CONSUMING ANIMALS AS an EDUCATIONAL ACT Dissertation

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

CONSUMING ANIMALS AS an EDUCATIONAL ACT Dissertation CONSUMING ANIMALS AS AN EDUCATIONAL ACT Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Bradley D. Rowe, B.A., M.S., M.A. Graduate Program in Education The Ohio State University 2012 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Bryan Warnick, Chair Dr. Ann Allen Dr. Antoinette Errante Dr. Philip Smith Copyright By Bradley D. Rowe 2012 Abstract The main purpose of this dissertation is to demonstrate that consuming animals is an educational act that warrants sustained attention. The main question I address is: What does the consumption of animals have to do with the life of the educated person? I argue that we should learn more about the lives—which is to say, the deprivation, torment, and death—of the animals we eat. This sort of learning requires a fresh way to think about not only education, but also food, eating, and animals. I aim to illuminate the extent to which we are implicated in systems of immense suffering, and at the same time, provoke us to grow by questioning deeply-entrenched habit of consuming animals. This dissertation is a theoretical exploration that may or may not lead to dietary change, but that does, I believe, hold potential to change the way we think and act in the world. In Chapter 1, I lay out the reasons why consuming animals is a rich subject for educational philosophy. Chapter 2 is a brief overview of the animal ethics literature to analyze the moral arguments for bringing nonhuman beings into the realm of human moral consideration. Clearly, eating animals is an ethical act and it is important to review who has said what about it. In Chapter 3, I explore John Dewey‘s conception of growth and argue that, for human moral growth, we should consider the habit of consuming animals. In Chapter 4, I shift the focus to (mis)education at the cultural level. I argue that it is important to understand the consumption of animals—as a problem of cultural miseducation—so that we are better situated to rethink and resist the cultural forces that ii shape the consenting attitudes underlying this fundamental act of consumption. Chapter 5 examines the educational significance of understanding animals-becoming-meat—that is, the agricultural and slaughtering practices that turn living, full-bodied animals into fragmented, edible pieces of meat. This chapter has a broader function, too, as I make a case for extending scholarly inquiry addressing consumerism and commercialism to (re)encompass production and labor. Animals-becoming-meat is a particular form of production and labor that illustrates and exposes the larger problems of distance, ignorance, and alienation in contemporary life; it also demonstrates how the foundational role of production is largely concealed and thus taken for granted in consumer society. I end with Chapter 6 where I argue that the most effective and transformative pedagogical means to understand animals-becoming-meat is to watch the process unfold, with our own eyes. Given the great extent that corporate agriculture goes to conceal the brutality behind its walls, I believe we must be unsettled with disturbing visuals of animals- becoming-meat. I argue that education should unveil the exploitive practices that remain deliberately hidden from public view—even if it is culturally taboo to do so. iii Acknowledgments First and foremost, I want to thank my committee. Each member possesses the qualities I value greatly in a human being: patience, intelligence, kindness, and understanding. Bryan Warnick introduced me to this thing called ―philosophy of education‖ and continues to show me how expansive and rich the area is. He has a knack for pushing me beyond my comfort zone, challenging me to become a better thinker and writer. Moreover, Bryan has provided me with many scholarly and teaching opportunities that have been central to my well-being and growth. I could not ask for a better advisor. Ann has kept me grounded, so to speak, and reminds me how imperative educational policy and practice are for implementing real change in the world. Antoinette has opened me up to a whole new world of ideas. Her compassion for others—human and animal— inspires me. Phil has been a steady source of emotional and intellectual support. I have learned a lot about philosophy and education in his classroom but I have learned more about myself through many, many long conversations with him. I thank all of you for your commitment and time. I am grateful for the abundance of support from friends, colleagues, and scholars who have all influenced this work in their unique way: Sam Rocha, Tom Falk, Todd Bitters, Leanne Sunderman, Susan Laird, Erin Castro, Michael Mueller, Abraham DeLeon, Katie Sandford-Gaebel, Taylor Klassman, josh kurz, Maria Cynthia Anderson, iv DeLeon Grey, David and Rachel Larson, Mitchell and Tonya McAlpin and the entire McAlpin family, Heather Dawson, and Ben Johnson. I owe a special thanks to Karen Graves. Karen put her faith in me during the beginning years of my doctoral program and remains an attentive listener, knowledgeable mentor, and personable colleague. My immediate family has been a constant reminder of the significance of love in human lives. Thank you: Jennifer Ventling, Susan and Michael Hufford, Harold Rowe, Jesse and Joshua, Lisa and Brandan Adams, Olivia and Isabella, and Brian and Michelle Rowe. No words could express my appreciation for the abundance of love my mother, Susan, has provided throughout my life. She is the most patient and caring person I know. Finally, I am deeply thankful for the love and wisdom of my grandparents, Mary and Ray Rowe—the farmers in my life. They have shaped my views on food, animals, and the land in the deepest sense. This dissertation would have never happened without their influence. I will never forget the Farm. v Vita 2004. .B.A. Social Science Education, Wright State University 2006. M.S. Teacher Education, University of Dayton 2010. M.A. Educational Philosophy The Ohio State University 2009-2010. .Graduate Teaching Associate The Ohio State University 2009-2012. .Visiting Instructor Denison University Publication Rowe, Bradley. ―Food, Habit, and the Consumption of Animals as Educational Encounter.‖ Philosophy of Education 2012. Urbana, Ill: Philosophy of Education Society (forthcoming). Rowe, Bradley, and Taylor Klassman. ―Educational Dystopia: Mary Shelley‘s Frankenstein and Race to the Top.‖ In Dystopia and Education: Insights for Theory, Praxis, and Policy, edited by Eric Sheffield and Jessica Heybach. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing (forthcoming). Rowe, Bradley. ―Frankenstein, Monsters, and Science Education: The Need for Broad- based Educational Policy.‖ In A Guide to Legislation and School Policy in Science Education: Assessing Schools for Generation R (Responsibility), edited by Michael Mueller, Deborah Tippins, and Arthur Stewart. New York: Springer, 2012. Rowe, Bradley. ―Understanding Animals-Becoming-Meat: Embracing a Disturbing Education.‖ Critical Education 2, no. 7 (2011):1-25. Rowe, Bradley. ―What‘s Wrong with Genetic Engineering? Ethics, Socio-scientific Issues, and Education.‖ In Cultural Studies and Environmentalism: The Confluence of Ecojustice, Place-based (Science) Education, and Indigenous Knowledge Systems, edited vi by Deborah Tippins, Michael Mueller, Michiel van Eijck, and Jennifer Adams, 129-136. New York: Springer, 2010. Warnick, Bryan, Bradley Rowe, and Sang Hyun Kim. ―Student Rights, Justice Clarence Thomas, and the Revolutionary Vision of Education.‖ Educational Theory 59, no. 2 (2009):145-165. Rowe, Bradley. ―Animal Rights and Human Growth: Intellectual Courage and Extending the Moral Community.‖ Philosophical Studies in Education 40 (2009): 153-166. Fields of Study Major Field: Education vii Table of Contents Abstract. .ii Acknowledgements. .iv Vita. vi Chapter 1: Food, Consuming Animals, and Language. .1 Introduction. .1 Food and the Consumption of Animals as Educational Encounter. .6 Consumerism, Consumption, and Consuming Animals. 12 The Purposes of My Methodology. 15 Conclusion. .18 Chapter 2: Animal Ethics: A Brief Overview. .19 Introduction. .19 Philosophy and the Moral Status of Animals. 22 Classical and Historical Views. 22 Contemporary Theories of Animal Ethics. 30 Moral Interests and Rights: Peter Singer and Tom Regan. 37 Eco-feminism: A Heart-felt Critique. .46 Pragmatism, Moral Pluralism, and Competing Goods. 49 Conclusion. .56 viii Chapter 3: Animal Ethics and Human Growth: On the Habit of Consuming Animals. 58 Introduction. 58 Why Animals—and Why Meat? . .59 Animal Ethics for Human Growth . 65 John Dewey and Growth. 66 Meat Eating as Habit and Catalyst for Growth. 70 A Case of Animals Ethics and Growth. 79 Conclusion. .85 Chapter 4: The Cultural Hegemony of Meat as Cultural Miseducation. 89 Introduction. 89 The Problem of Generations, Cultural Liabilities, and the Cultural Hegemony of Meat. 92 Liability #1: The Industrial Meat Eater. .94 Liability #2: Language and the ‗Absent Referent‘. 100 Liability #3: Objectification and Consumption of Women‘s and Animals‘ Bodies. .105 Conclusion. .112 Chapter 5: Animals-Becoming-Meat: From Living Animal to Dead Commodity. 114 Introduction. 114 School Lunch and a Comprehensive View of School Commercialism. .117 Education Down on the Farm. 123 Stories behind Meat: Humans, Animals, and the Land. .130 The Stickers: Or, Those Who Kill the Animals we Eat. .135 Chickens: Or, Wings and Eggs. 139 ix Pigs: Or, Bacon and Pork Chops. 142 The Land and Resources. 145 Proponents and Defenses of Factory Farming. .148 Conclusion. .157 Chapter 6: A Disturbing Conclusion: Seeing the Unseen, Education the Taboo. 160 Introduction. .160 The Role of the Visual in Consumer Culture. 161 Education and Visual Representations of Animals-Becoming-Meat. 163 What Will Parents Say? A Case for Autonomy. .172 Conclusion. .182 Bibliography. .186 x Chapter 1 Food, Consuming Animals, and Language Introduction In highly consumerist societies, eating animals has become one of the most atrocious of all human-nonhuman relationships.
Recommended publications
  • Jewish Storytelling
    Volume 34, Number 8 the May 2015 Iyyar/SivanVolume 31, Number 5775 7 March 2012 TEMPLE BETH ABRAHAM Adar / Nisan 5772 JEWISH R STORYTELLINGi Pu M DIRECTORY SERVICES SCHEDULE GENERAL INFORMATION: All phone numbers use (510) prefix unless otherwise noted. Services, Location, Time Monday & Thursday Mailing Address 336 Euclid Ave. Oakland, CA 94610 Morning Minyan, Chapel, 8:00 a.m. Hours M-Th: 9 a.m.-4 p.m., Fr: 9 a.m.-3 p.m. Friday Evening Office Phone 832-0936 (Kabbalat Shabbat), Chapel, 6:15 p.m. Office Fax 832-4930 Shabbat Morning, Sanctuary, 9:30 a.m. E-Mail [email protected] Candle Lighting (Friday) Gan Avraham 763-7528 May 1, 7:41 p.m. Bet Sefer 663-1683 May 8, 7:48 p.m. STAFF May 15, 7:54 p.m. May 22, 8:00 p.m. Rabbi (x 213) Mark Bloom Richard Kaplan, May 29, 8:05 p.m. Cantor [email protected] Torah Portions (Saturday) Gabbai Marshall Langfeld May 2, Acharei-Kedoshim Executive Director (x 214) Rayna Arnold May 9, Emor Office Manager (x 210) Virginia Tiger May 16, Behar-Bechukotai Bet Sefer Director Susan Simon 663-1683 May 23, Bamidbar Gan Avraham Director Barbara Kanter 763-7528 May 30, Naso Bookkeeper (x 215) Kevin Blattel Facilities Manager (x 211) Joe Lewis Kindergym/ Dawn Margolin 547-7726 Toddler Program TEMPLE BETH ABRAHAM Volunteers (x 229) Herman & Agnes Pencovic OFFICERS OF THE BOARD is proud to support the Conservative Movement by affiliating with The United President Mark Fickes 652-8545 Synagogue of Conservative Judaism. Vice President Eric Friedman 984-2575 Vice President Alice Hale 336-3044 Vice President Flo Raskin 653-7947 Vice President Laura Wildmann 601-9571 Advertising Policy: Anyone may sponsor an issue Secretary JB Leibovitch 653-7133 of The Omer and receive a dedication for their Treasurer Susan Shub 852-2500 business or loved one.
    [Show full text]
  • Geological Timeline
    Geological Timeline In this pack you will find information and activities to help your class grasp the concept of geological time, just how old our planet is, and just how young we, as a species, are. Planet Earth is 4,600 million years old. We all know this is very old indeed, but big numbers like this are always difficult to get your head around. The activities in this pack will help your class to make visual representations of the age of the Earth to help them get to grips with the timescales involved. Important EvEnts In thE Earth’s hIstory 4600 mya (million years ago) – Planet Earth formed. Dust left over from the birth of the sun clumped together to form planet Earth. The other planets in our solar system were also formed in this way at about the same time. 4500 mya – Earth’s core and crust formed. Dense metals sank to the centre of the Earth and formed the core, while the outside layer cooled and solidified to form the Earth’s crust. 4400 mya – The Earth’s first oceans formed. Water vapour was released into the Earth’s atmosphere by volcanism. It then cooled, fell back down as rain, and formed the Earth’s first oceans. Some water may also have been brought to Earth by comets and asteroids. 3850 mya – The first life appeared on Earth. It was very simple single-celled organisms. Exactly how life first arose is a mystery. 1500 mya – Oxygen began to accumulate in the Earth’s atmosphere. Oxygen is made by cyanobacteria (blue-green algae) as a product of photosynthesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Pork Q&A Answer
    Supplemental Activity: TEACHER GUIDE Pork Q&A Answer Key Pork Q & A - ANSWER KEY Cooking Methods 1. How does the tenderness of the meat determine the method of cooking (direct or indirect heat)? As a general rule, the cuts from the loin and tenderloin tend to be the most tender – cook with direct heat. When working with larger, less-tender cuts, simply remember to cook slowly over indirect heat. 2. What is sautéing? What cuts of meat are ideal for sautéing? • Sauteing is to add a little cooking oil to pan; sauté over medium-high heat and turn once halfway through cooking time. • Meat cuts to sauté include cutlets, loin chops (bone-in or boneless), tenderloin medallions, and ground pork patties. 3. What is grilling? What cuts of meat are ideal for grilling? • Grilling is a high-heat, direct method of cooking meat over live flames. • Meat cuts to grill include loin chops (3/4 inch thickness), thick loin chops (1½ inch thick and boneless), loin kabobs, tenderloin, and ground pork patties. 4. What does it mean to marinate? What are two cuts of pork to marinate? • To marinate means to let food stand in marinade for a certain length of time to tenderize it and develop its flavor. A marinade may be a flavorful liquid such as barbecue sauce or a dry rub. • Two cuts of pork to marinate could be pork shoulder and roasts. 5. What is another name for indirect grilling? Barbecuing 6. What is barbecuing? What cuts of pork are best for barbecuing? Barbecuing is characterized by a long, low-heat, smoke-cooking method using coals, smoldering logs or chunks of wood.
    [Show full text]
  • The Living World
    1 The Living World MultipleChoiceQuestions (MCQs) 1 As we go from species to kingdom in a taxonomic hierarchy, the number of common characteristics (a)willdecrease (b)willincrease (c)remainsame (d) mayincreaseordecrease Ans. (a) Lower the taxa, more are the characteristic that the members within the taxon share. So, lowest taxon share the maximum number of morphological similarities, while its similarities decrease as we move towards the higher hierarchy, i.e., class, kingdom. Thus,restoftheoptionareincorrect. 2 Which of the following ‘suffixes’ used for units of classification in plants indicates a taxonomic category of ‘family’? (a) − Ales (b) − Onae (c) − Aceae (d) − Ae K ThinkingProcess Biological classification of organism is a process by which any living organism is classified into convenient categories based on some common observable characters. The categoriesareknownas taxons. Ans. (c) The name of a family, a taxon, in plants always end with suffixes aceae, e.g., Solanaceae, Cannaceae and Poaceae. Ales suffix is used for taxon ‘order’ while ae suffix is used for taxon ‘class’ and onae suffixesarenotusedatallinanyofthetaxons. 3 The term ‘systematics’ refers to (a)identificationandstudyoforgansystems (b)identificationandpreservationofplantsandanimals (c)diversityofkindsoforganismsandtheirrelationship (d) studyofhabitatsoforganismsandtheirclassification K ThinkingProcess The planet earth is full of variety of different forms of life. The number of species that are named and described are between 1.7-1.8 million. As we explore new areas, new organisms are continuously being identified, named and described on scientific basis of systematicslaiddownbytaxonomists. 1 2 (Class XI) Solutions Ans. (c) The word systematics is derived from Latin word ‘Systema’ which means systematic arrangement of organisms. Linnaeus used ‘Systema Naturae’ as a title of his publication.
    [Show full text]
  • Few Translation of Works of Tamil Sidhas, Saints and Poets Contents
    Few translation of works of Tamil Sidhas, Saints and Poets I belong to Kerala but I did study Tamil Language with great interest.Here is translation of random religious works That I have done Contents Few translation of works of Tamil Sidhas, Saints and Poets ................. 1 1.Thiruvalluvar’s Thirukkual ...................................................................... 7 2.Vaan chirappu .................................................................................... 9 3.Neethar Perumai .............................................................................. 11 4.Aran Valiyuruthal ............................................................................. 13 5.Yil Vazhkai ........................................................................................ 15 6. Vaazhkkai thunai nalam .................................................................. 18 7.Makkat peru ..................................................................................... 20 8.Anbudamai ....................................................................................... 21 9.Virunthombal ................................................................................... 23 10.Iniyavai kooral ............................................................................... 25 11.Chei nandri arithal ......................................................................... 28 12.Naduvu nilamai- ............................................................................. 29 13.Adakkamudamai ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethics of the Meat Paradox
    The Ethics of the Meat Paradox Lars Ursin* The meat paradox—to like eating meat, but dislike killing and harming animals—confronts omnivores with a powerful contradiction between eating and caring for animals. The paradox, however, trades on a conflation of the illegitimacy of harming and killing animals. While harming animals is morally wrong, killing animals can be legitimate if done with minimal suffering and respect for the moral status of the animal. This moral status demands the ac- knowledgement of a certain justification for killing animals that makes modesty a virtue of the omnivore. The psychological problem with regard to killing animals can persist even if the moral tension is weakened, but only to a certain degree, since emotions and principles are interdependent in moral reasoning. Virtuous meat consumption demands a willingness to face the conflicting feelings involved in killing animals and to tolerate the resulting tension. INTRODUCTION Humans and animals interact in a number of ways and establish a diversity of relationships. Humans relate to animals as members of the family, as research objects in the laboratory, as guide dogs, trained animals in sports and shows, and still many other kinds of relations. In some of these relations, animals are edible beings. The relation between humans and animals that are eaten is a special one. Like animals sacrificed for research purposes, the animals we eat are killed by us. The acceptance and legitimacy of this killing is thus an essential part of eating animals. By eating animals, we enter into a very intimate relation with the animal. We eat parts of the animal and digest the parts, thus allowing these parts to be absorbed into our bodies.
    [Show full text]
  • Year in Review
    2012YEAR IN REVIEW THANK YOU Dear Friends, grassroots outreach events, humane education workshops, and compelling advertising 2012 was truly a groundbreaking year at campaigns, MFA is inspiring a new Mercy For Animals. In the last 12 months generation to explore a vegan lifestyle. we have opened the hearts and minds of tens of millions of Americans to the plight of Our efforts are having an impact—exposing animals who suffer behind the closed doors of cruelty and motivating change. As public our nation’s factory farms, livestock auctions, awareness continues to grow regarding and slaughterhouses. Our undercover factory farming, the demand for meat is finally investigations have cast a bright light on on the decline, meaning that hundreds of abusive practices, and our legal advocacy millions of animals will be spared the horrors efforts have led to arrests, prosecutions, and of industrial animal agriculture. historic convictions of animal abusers. This hard-fought progress has been made Our brand new corporate outreach possible because of you—MFA’s cherished department is giving animals a much- members. Every day I am grateful to each needed voice in the boardrooms of some of you for your generous and unwavering of the country’s largest and most powerful support. Together we are truly building a companies. In the past year, MFA has kinder future for all creatures. Thank you for pressured major corporations—including paving the way. Costco, Kmart, and Kraft Foods—to implement new policies that will reduce the With gratitude, suffering of millions of pigs and cows. MFA’s educational outreach campaigns are helping consumers from coast to coast see farmed animals in a new light.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Civilisation 'Maintains Itself By
    Western Civilisation ‘maintains itself by banishing Others (nature, animals, women, children) to the margin’.1 How do Notions of Alterity and/or Marginalisation Feature in the Representation of Animals? Georgia Horne Humans’ relationship with animals is a complexly mutable one, with the parameters of distinction being repeatedly rethought and redrawn by thinkers from a range of disciplines. The protean nature of these irreconcilable views is apparent given how, as observed by John Berger, throughout history animals have been concurrently bred yet sacrificed, subjected to suffering yet worshipped in idolatry.2 Accordingly, animals have continuously occupied a liminal space both above and below (but never with) man, a form of existential dualism reflective of the seemingly irresolvable struggle of where to place them in relation to humans. The site of difference between humans and other animals is where we derive our ontological concepts of humanity and animality and thus, ultimately, our place in the world as one species amongst others (an admittedly anthropocentric telos). Traditionally, ontological discourse on this issue has been dominated by an animal-human dichotomy, wherein the subjects are defined in opposition to each other.3 The privation of certain attributes are cited as evidence for this polarity, with philosophers such as Kant, Descartes and Aristotle citing humans’ capacity to reason as the qualifying criterion that simultaneously demarcates humans from animals, and endows us with a superiority over them. This binary contradistinction is threatened in Franz Kafka’s ‘A Report to an Academy’, which utilises various postcolonial narrative strategies to obfuscate the human-animal distinction, destabilising the West’s confident certainty in the Otherness of animals, and complicating the ethics of using animals’ assumed alterity to justify their marginalisation and mistreatment.
    [Show full text]
  • All Creation Groans: the Lives of Factory Farm Animals in the United States
    InSight: RIVIER ACADEMIC JOURNAL, VOLUME 13, NUMBER 1, SPRING 2017 “ALL CREATION GROANS”: The Lives of Factory Farm Animals in the United States Sr. Lucille C. Thibodeau, pm, Ph.D.* Writer-in-Residence, Department of English, Rivier University Today, more animals suffer at human hands than at any other time in history. It is therefore not surprising that an intense and controversial debate is taking place over the status of the 60+ billion animals raised and slaughtered for food worldwide every year. To keep up with the high demand for meat, industrialized nations employ modern processes generally referred to as “factory farming.” This article focuses on factory farming in the United States because the United States inaugurated this approach to farming, because factory farming is more highly sophisticated here than elsewhere, and because the government agency overseeing it, the Department of Agriculture (USDA), publishes abundant readily available statistics that reveal the astonishing scale of factory farming in this country.1 The debate over factory farming is often “complicated and contentious,”2 with the deepest point of contention arising over the nature, degree, and duration of suffering food animals undergo. “In their numbers and in the duration and depth of the cruelty inflicted upon them,” writes Allan Kornberg, M.D., former Executive Director of Farm Sanctuary in a 2012 Farm Sanctuary brochure, “factory-farm animals are the most widely abused and most suffering of all creatures on our planet.” Raising the specter of animal suffering inevitably raises the question of animal consciousness and sentience. Jeremy Bentham, the 18th-century founder of utilitarianism, focused on sentience as the source of animals’ entitlement to equal consideration of interests.
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Farm Foxes Undermines the Animal Domestication Syndrome, Trends in Ecology & Evolution (2019)
    Please cite this article in press as: Lord et al., The History of Farm Foxes Undermines the Animal Domestication Syndrome, Trends in Ecology & Evolution (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2019.10.011 Trends in Ecology & Evolution Opinion The History of Farm Foxes Undermines the Animal Domestication Syndrome Kathryn A. Lord,1,2 Greger Larson,3,@ Raymond P. Coppinger,4,6 and Elinor K. Karlsson1,2,5,@,* The Russian Farm-Fox Experiment is the best known experimental study in animal domestication. Highlights By subjecting a population of foxes to selection for tameness alone, Dimitry Belyaev generated The ‘domestication syndrome’ has foxes that possessed a suite of characteristics that mimicked those found across domesticated been a central focus of research species. This ‘domestication syndrome’ has been a central focus of research into the biological into the biological processes un- pathways modified during domestication. Here, we chart the origins of Belyaev’s foxes in derlying domestication. The eastern Canada and critically assess the appearance of domestication syndrome traits across an- Russian Farm-Fox Experiment was imal domesticates. Our results suggest that both the conclusions of the Farm-Fox Experiment the first to test whether there is a and the ubiquity of domestication syndrome have been overstated. To understand the process causal relationship between selec- tion for tameness and the domes- of domestication requires a more comprehensive approach focused on essential adaptations to tication syndrome. human-modified environments. Historical records and genetic The Origins of Domestication Syndrome analysis show that the foxes used in The domestication syndrome describes a suite of behavioral and morphological characteristics the Farm-Fox Experiment origi- consistently observed in domesticated populations.
    [Show full text]
  • An Inquiry Into Animal Rights Vegan Activists' Perception and Practice of Persuasion
    An Inquiry into Animal Rights Vegan Activists’ Perception and Practice of Persuasion by Angela Gunther B.A., Simon Fraser University, 2006 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the School of Communication ! Angela Gunther 2012 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Summer 2012 All rights reserved. However, in accordance with the Copyright Act of Canada, this work may be reproduced, without authorization, under the conditions for “Fair Dealing.” Therefore, limited reproduction of this work for the purposes of private study, research, criticism, review and news reporting is likely to be in accordance with the law, particularly if cited appropriately. Approval Name: Angela Gunther Degree: Master of Arts Title of Thesis: An Inquiry into Animal Rights Vegan Activists’ Perception and Practice of Persuasion Examining Committee: Chair: Kathi Cross Gary McCarron Senior Supervisor Associate Professor Robert Anderson Supervisor Professor Michael Kenny External Examiner Professor, Anthropology SFU Date Defended/Approved: June 28, 2012 ii Partial Copyright Licence iii Abstract This thesis interrogates the persuasive practices of Animal Rights Vegan Activists (ARVAs) in order to determine why and how ARVAs fail to convince people to become and stay veg*n, and what they might do to succeed. While ARVAs and ARVAism are the focus of this inquiry, the approaches, concepts and theories used are broadly applicable and therefore this investigation is potentially useful for any activist or group of activists wishing to interrogate and improve their persuasive practices. Keywords: Persuasion; Communication for Social Change; Animal Rights; Veg*nism; Activism iv Table of Contents Approval ............................................................................................................................. ii! Partial Copyright Licence .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Baby Boomer Vegetarians
    Baby Boomer Vegetarians By Stephen F. Barnes, Ph.D. According to some sources, vegetarianism is on a modest uptick or at least holding its own, with about 6.7 percent of the U.S. adult population (20 million) reporting they no longer eat meat, and 2.3 percent (7 million) claiming they never eat meat, fish or fowl—and, by definition, are true vegetarians. Still smaller, about 1.4 percent don’t eat, wear, or use much of anything caught, hatched, milked, or slaughtered (no meat, fish/seafood, poultry, dairy products/eggs) and are known as vegans (pronounced veeguns). Women are twice as likely to avoid eating meat than men, and roughly 10 percent of Baby Boomers are probably non-meat eaters by our non-scientific best estimate. Most of these numbers (see summary box below) are from a national survey conducted in 2009 for the Vegetarian Resource Group. And while the survey sample only consisted of 2,397 adults and used an on-line query technique, the Harris Poll research methodology was considered highly reliable (Stahler, 2009). U.S. Dietary Habits of Adults 18 Years and Older 100% Total adults 6.7% Never eat meat 6.3% Never eat poultry 14.6% Never eat fish/seafood 7.6% Never eat dairy products 8.8% Never eat eggs 23.4% Never eat honey 2.3% Never eat meat, poultry, fish/seafood (vegetarian) 1.4% Never eat meat, poultry, fish/seafood, dairy products/eggs (vegan, except for possibly honey) Of course, there are lots of reasons why people do not eat certain foods.
    [Show full text]