Report on the Rights and Obligations of Citizens and Non-Citizens in Selected Countries

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Report on the Rights and Obligations of Citizens and Non-Citizens in Selected Countries Report on the rights and obligations of citizens and non-citizens in selected countries Principles of eligibility underpinning access to state territory, citizenship and welfare Bridget Anderson, Isabel Shutes, Sarah Walker Document Identifier D10.1 : Report on the rights and obligations of citizens and non-citizens in selected countries Version 1.0 Date Due 31.07.2014 Submission date 31.07.2014 WorkPackage 10 Balancing Citizenship of Insiders and Outsiders Lead Beneficiary 25 The Chancellor, Masters and Scholars of the University of Oxford Dissemination Level PU Change log version Date amended by changes 0.1 18/06/2014 UOXF/ LSE Final draft version created 1.0 14/07/2014 final version deliverable 10.1 created Partners involved number partner name People involved 25 University of Oxford Bridget Anderson Sarah Walker 24 LSE Isabel Shutes 1 Utrecht University Dorota Lepianka 3 University of Zagreb Vedrana Baricevic Drazen Hoffman 13 University College Dublin Graham Finlay 14 Hebrew University of Jerusalem John Gal Dana Halevy 18 University of Oviedo Hans van den Broek Pilar Jimenez Ángel Espiniella Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................................... 4 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................... 5 1. CITIZENSHIP AND ITS OTHERS ..................................................................................................................... 7 2. ENTRY .......................................................................................................................................................... 9 2.1 EU citizens .................................................................................................................................. 9 2.2 Third Country Nationals ........................................................................................................... 11 3. NATURALISATION ...................................................................................................................................... 22 3.1 Hierarchies of naturalisation ................................................................................................... 22 3.2 Care and family ........................................................................................................................ 26 3.3 Work ........................................................................................................................................ 31 3.4 Wealth and income ................................................................................................................. 32 3.5 The Naturalisation Process ...................................................................................................... 33 4. SOCIAL SECURITY ....................................................................................................................................... 37 4.1 Work and care ......................................................................................................................... 38 4.2 Residence ................................................................................................................................. 39 5. INTERCONNECTIONS BETWEEN THESE HIERARCHIES OF DESERVINGNESS .............................................. 43 5.1 Mobility, citizenship and social security .................................................................................. 43 5.2 Work: right or duty? ................................................................................................................ 44 5.3 Marriage and Families: Contradictions and connections ........................................................ 46 5.4 Citizenship and the EU ............................................................................................................. 47 6. CONCLUSION ............................................................................................................................................. 49 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................................. 52 APPENDIX 1: D10.1 TASK 1: OVERVIEW OF PRINCIPLES OF ELIGIBILITY ....................................................... 57 APPENDIX 2: D10.1. EXPLANATORY NOTE ................................................................................................... 60 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report derives from the work of partners involved in Work Package 10 of the FP7 programme bEUcitizen: Utrecht University (The Netherlands); the University of Zagreb (Croatia); University College Dublin (Ireland); the Hebrew University of Jerusalem (Israel); the University of Oviedo (Spain) and the London School of Economics and the University of Oxford (UK). The report explores the complex dynamics of insiders and outsiders, and their mutual dependence. For inclusion and exclusion are in practice seldom binaries, but marked by shades of difference, by differential inclusion and exclusion. WP10 focuses on the three key axes of mobility, naturalisation, and welfare benefits, all of which intersect to explore the ways in which ‘citizenship’ is both a legal and a normative status, that is, how formal in/exclusion is related to ideas of deservingness and ‘Good Citizenship’. This report explores the interactions of these axes and the differential in/exclusions that result via the six states under study, which enable us to examine EU15 (Ireland, Netherlands, UK, and Spain as a Southern EU state), new member (Croatia) and non-EU (Israel) states. Access to state territory (mobility). In EU member states hierarchies of entry are dependent upon citizenship status, wealth or skills except for those considered part of the diaspora understood as shared ethnicity/common descent (Croatia, Spain, Ireland), or religion (Israel: Law of Return). There is an evident move towards a knowledge-based economy and attracting the ‘brightest and the best’ across the EU, with resultant restricted access for family migration and lower skilled workers. Thus, access revolves around the management of the mobility of ‘the poor’, except where co-ethnicity/ religion provides access to ‘poor’ but in some cases this is curtailed by EU membership. Access to citizenship (naturalisation) Increasingly, in what has been termed the commodification of citizenship, citizenship is premised upon wealth and income, under the guise of ‘integration’. However, there is a difference between those for whom naturalisation is a prize and those for whom it is an entitlement. For those whose access to naturalisation is not shaped by ethnicity/diaspora, naturalisation is a ‘privilege’. In contrast, those whose access is shaped by ethnicity/diaspora often have facilitated naturalisation processes. Thus preferential access to citizenship is evident for some groups. Formal citizenship is an acknowledgment of a prior community. Access to Social Security European citizenship not only reinforces but extends the worker-citizen model: Work (effective and genuine) is increasingly a central requirement to access welfare for both citizens and EEA, save for those whose access is shaped by ethnicity/diaspora. Conclusions Differential inclusion and exclusion: EU nationals residing in an EU state of which they are not a citizen are not totally included – but, neither, necessarily, are nationals (e.g. Roma). Neither are TCNs totally excluded: e.g. TCNs with legal permanent residence have many of the rights of citizens (though not rights as EU nationals). A clear disjuncture between state and nation: for nations large populations are good and lend credibility; for states large populations are expensive. Concerns about the instrumental use of EU citizenship (access to work and benefits) have consequences for member states’ national social security and naturalisation policies. 4 INTRODUCTION “Citizenship of the Union is hereby established. Every person holding the nationality of a Member State shall be a citizen of the Union. Citizenship of the Union shall be additional to and shall not replace national citizenship.” The establishment of EU citizenship in 1992 entailed the establishment of the ‘Third Country National’ (TCN). As citizens of EU member states became EU insiders so citizens of non-EU states were turned into EU outsiders. Work Package 10 of the FP7 programme bEUcitizen explores the complex dynamics of insiders and outsiders, and their mutual dependence. Inclusion and exclusion are in practice seldom binaries, but marked by shades of difference, that is inclusion and exclusion are differential. EU nationals residing in an EU state of which they are not a citizen are not totally included – and importantly, neither, necessarily, are nationals, Roma people for instance may have formal national citizenship but may be excluded in multiple ways. Neither are TCNs totally excluded: TCNs with legal permanent residence for example can enjoy many of the rights of citizens of the state where they reside (though not rights as EU nationals). Furthermore ‘Accession state nationals’ sit between EU nationals and TCNs, while the European Neighbourhood Policy offers TCNs facilitated access to Schengen visas and so on. We are particularly interested in the ways in which measures directed against TCN/EU nationals impact on resident and non-resident citizens. There are multiple axes of
Recommended publications
  • The Nuclear Debate Within the EU - EU Member States for Or Against - a Status Report*
    The Nuclear Debate within the EU - EU Member States For or Against - A Status Report* Colour Key Pro Nuclear Power Divided Against Nuclear Power Current or Country Planned In Favour Against Comment (Reactors = TWh) Construction of NPP NPP % of electricity Y/N Czech Republic Y In July 2008, CEZ announced a plan to build two more reactors at Temelín, with construction (6 = 26.7 TWh) Temelin to start in 2013 and commissioning of the first unit in 2020. In March 2010, CEZ announced that discussions had begun with three vendor groups prior to the bid submission: a 26.7% 2 reactors consortium led by Westinghouse; a consortium of Škoda JS, Atomstroyexport, and OKB Gidropress; and France’s AREVA. In February 2011, the final delivery date was shifted to 2025. In October 2011 CEZ asked for tenders from three companies (AREVA, Westinghouse and Atomstroyexport with Skoda) for a turnkey contract for the construction of two units plus nine years’ worth of fuel. The bids were due in July 2012, with contracts to be signed in late 2013. CEZ is reported to be considering seeking an outside investor, for $10 billion, for the project. CEZ stated in May 2012, that “the partnership will probably be formed after the contract with the selected supplier is signed, which is expected to happen in 2013”. Finland Y The Olkiluoto 3 (OL3) project (AREVA) is about five years behind schedule and 100% over (4 = 22.3 TWh) Olkiluoto-3 & budget. The problems produced by the OL3 project have not prevented TVO from filing an application, in April 2008, for a decision-in-principle to develop “OL4”, a 1–1.8 GW reactor 31.6% 4 to start construction in 2012 and enter operation “in the late 2010s”.
    [Show full text]
  • M I N U T E S
    1 / 7 Internationale Kommission für Alpines Rettungswesen IKAR Commission Internationale du Sauvetage Alpin CISA International Commission for Alpine Rescue ICAR 64. Delegiertenversammlung 64ème Assemblée des délégués 64th Assembly of delegates 6. Oktober / Octobre / October 2012 Krynica, Poland M I N U T E S 1. Welcome President Gerold Biner welcomes the delegates to the 64th Assembly of Delegates. He is asking the delegates to stand in memory of mountain rescuers who have passed away this past year; especially the former member of the ICAR Executive Committee Emmanuel Schmutz. Excused for the assembly are: - Hans-Jürg Etter - Reinhard Dörflinger - Pierre Blanc - Dr. Urs Wieget A special welcome goes to the honorary members: - Nils Farlund - Louis Salzmann - Toni Grab - Michael Swangard There are 3 amendments to today’s agenda: - Item 6: Acceptance and exclusion of B and C members. The following items are added: • 6.7 University of Saragossa CUEMUM (university specialization courses in mountain emergency medicine), B member • 6.8 Society of Mountain Medicine Canada, B member - Item 7: Elections. Since there are elections pending for board members, the following item is added: • 7.0 Reelection of current members of the executive committee and commissions. No requests to speak. The Assembly of Delegates approves the new agenda. Air Zermatt AG, Postfach CH – 3920 Zermatt Switzerland +41 27 966 86 86 www.ikar-cisa.org [email protected] 2 / 7 2. Roll Call, Appointing Office There are 31 A and 15 B members represented at the Assembly. The Assembly has a total of 77 votes. Hans-Martin Henny and Volker Lischke are appointed to count the votes.
    [Show full text]
  • Economic Crisis, Health Systems and Health in Europe
    Economic crisis…Europe fin.qxp_Layout 1 26/06/2015 08:28 Page 1 Economic Crisis, Health Systems European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies Series and Health in Europe Impact and implications for policy Economic shocks pose a threat to health and health system E c performance by increasing people’s need for health care and o n making access to care more difficult – a situation compounded o by cuts in public spending on health and other social services. m i But these negative effects can be avoided by timely public c policy action. While important public policy levers lie outside C a r n the health sector, in the hands of those responsible for fiscal i s d policy and social protection, the health system response is i s Economic Crisis, H , critical. e H a This book looks at how health systems in Europe reacted to e l a t h pressure created by the financial and economic crisis that began l t Health Systems and h in 2008. Drawing on the experience of over 45 countries, the i n S authors: E y u s t analyse health system responses to the crisis in three policy r Health in Europe e • o m areas: public funding for the health system; health coverage; p e and health service planning, purchasing and delivery s Impact and implications for policy • assess the impact of these responses on health systems and population health M T h l o identify policies most likely to sustain the performance of a d • m health systems facing financial pressure o s v o s n k , y explore the political economy of implementing reforms in a , • F i M crisis g u a e r e The book is essential reading for anyone who wants to r a s s s o understand the choices available to policy-makers – and the , , E C implications of failing to protect health and health-system v y e l t u performance – in the face of economic and other forms of shock.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Download
    www.jcer.net Journal of Contemporary European Research Volume 14, Issue 4 (2018) Editors Maxine David Christopher Huggins Kenneth McDonagh Editorial Assistant Kamila Feddek ISSN 1815-347X Volume 14, Issue 4 (2018) ISSN 1815-347X Contents SPECIAL SECTION The Next European Century? by Kenneth McDonagh 290-295 Testing the Boundaries of Order? Europe, the European Union and a Changing 296-302 World Arena by Michael Smith The Next European Century? Europe in Global Politics in the Twenty-First Century 303-309 by Brigid Laffan These Are Those That Faustus Most Desires: Identity, Iconography and ‘Europe’ in 310-323 the Crimea Crisis by Russell Foster Hotspots: Questioning the Future of Europe through Its Borders by Elisa Pascucci 324-329 and Emma Patchett Video Interviews European Security in the 21st Century: A Conversation with Dr Nathalie Tocci 330 European Law in the 21st Century: A Conversation with Professor Federico 331 Fabbrini RESEARCH ARTICLES The Relationship between Economic Performance and the Rise of ‘Unholy 332-348 Alliances‘ in the European Union by Marco Morini Reversed Conditionality in EU External Migration Policy: The Case of Morocco by 349-363 Fanny Tittel-Mosser BOOK REVIEWS Simulations of Decision-Making as Active Learning Tools. Design and Effects of 364-366 Political Science Simulations by Katja Biedenkopf 288 Volume 14, Issue 4 (2018) jcer.net ISSN 1815-347X Contributors Katja Biedenkopf, University of Leuven Federico Fabbrini, Dublin City University Russell Foster, King’s College London Brigid Laffan, European University Institute Kenneth McDonagh, Dublin City University Marco Morini, European University Institute Elisa Pascucci, University of Helsinki Emma Patchett, University of Helsinki Michael Smith, University of Warwick Fanny Tittel-Mosser, University of Minho Nathalie Tocci, Istituto Affari Internazionali, Rome 289 Journal of Contemporary European Research Volume 14, Issue 4 (2018) Preface Kenneth McDonagh, Dublin City University Citation McDonagh, K.
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study – Croatia1
    EUROPEAN COMMISSION Brussels, 11.4.2019 SWD(2019) 154 final PART 2/9 COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT CASE STUDY - CROATIA Accompanying the document REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE COUNCIL on the evaluation of the Council Recommendation on the integration of the long-term unemployed into the labour market {COM(2019) 169 final} - {SWD(2019) 155 final} EN EN CASE STUDY – CROATIA1 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 150 1.1 Context of the implementation of the Recommendation 150 1.1.1 Evolution of labour market situation 150 1.1.2 Institutional framework for providing support to the long-term unemployed 152 2. IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RECOMMENDATION 153 2.1 Progress on implementation of the Recommendation 153 2.1.1 Registration of long term unemployed 154 2.1.2 Individualised support 155 2.1.3 Coordination of support 158 2.1.4 Cooperation with employers and businesses 159 2.2 Examples of measures 161 2.3 Use of the ESF to implement the Recommendation 161 2.4 Monitoring of implementation 162 3. CONCLUSIONS 163 3.1 Relevance 163 3.2 Effectiveness 163 3.3 Efficiency 164 3.4 Coherence 164 3.5 EU added value 164 4. LIST OF INTERVIEWEES 166 1 Study supporting the evaluation of the Council Recommendation on the integration of long-term unemployed into the labour market, Ramboll Management consortium for the European Commission, 2019 149 1. INTRODUCTION The objective of this report is to assess and explore the concrete actions taken at national and local level in Croatia, in response to the Recommendation on the integration of the long-term unemployed into the labour market (2016/C 67/01) (hereafter ‘the Recommendation’).
    [Show full text]
  • The EU's Stability-Democracy Dilemma in the Context of the Problematic Accession of the Western Balk
    Journal of Contemporary European Studies ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/cjea20 The EU’s stability-democracy dilemma in the context of the problematic accession of the Western Balkan states Nicholas Ross Smith , Nina Markovic-Khaze & Maja Kovacevic To cite this article: Nicholas Ross Smith , Nina Markovic-Khaze & Maja Kovacevic (2020): The EU’s stability-democracy dilemma in the context of the problematic accession of the Western Balkan states, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, DOI: 10.1080/14782804.2020.1823823 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2020.1823823 Published online: 14 Sep 2020. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 169 View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=cjea20 JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY EUROPEAN STUDIES https://doi.org/10.1080/14782804.2020.1823823 ARTICLE The EU’s stability-democracy dilemma in the context of the problematic accession of the Western Balkan states Nicholas Ross Smith a, Nina Markovic-Khazeb and Maja Kovacevicc aSchool of International Studies, University of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo, China; bDepartment of Security Studies and Criminology, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia; cFaculty of Political Science, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia ABSTRACT KEYWORDS The accession of the remaining six Western Balkan states into the EU is Stability; democracy; EU shrouded in much uncertainty. Despite Croatia finally traversing the diffi­ foreign policy; Western cult path to eventual membership in 2013, not one of the remaining Balkans democratization; EU Western Balkan countries can claim to be on a definite pathway to enlargement membership today.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnology and Anthropology in Europe Towards a Trans-National Discipline
    Ethnology and Anthropology in Europe Towards a Trans-National Discipline Jasna Čapo Institute of Ethnology and Folklore Research, Zagreb Abstract Twenty-five years after the collapse of communism in Eastern Europe, the European East-West divide has not been relegated to the annals of history. Among other areas, it persists tenaciously within the ethnological/anthropological sciences practised in Eu- rope. This article deconstructs and challenges reified differences between ethnologies in Central-Eastern Europe and Western, mainly British-style anthropology. It pro- poses to go beyond the prevalent divisive discourse towards a trans-national European ethnology/anthropology of Europe. It argues that fairness and equality in academic dialogue is a necessary prerequisite of such an endeavour. hough twenty-five years have passed since the fall of the Berlin Wall and the collapse of communism in Eastern Europe, entrenched Cold War divisions remain in place on the European continent. One encoun- Tters still the notion of a European “East” that is different from the “West.” It refers not to the geographic but the symbolic European “East,” a former space of communist ideology and socialist societies. In geographic terms, it includes Central and Eastern Europe (from now on referred to as CEE, both in the ad- jectival and substantival form). Most of the former socialist countries in that area have joined the European Union, but this does not preclude the outdated notion of the “East” being widely used. The polarity “West”-”East” stands for many opposites: centre/core vs. periphery/margin, capitalism vs. former so- cialism (today post-socialist/post-communist space), democratic vs.
    [Show full text]
  • Top Incomes in Croatia and Slovenia, from 1960S Until Today
    WID.world WORKING PAPER SERIES N° 2018/8 Top incomes in Croatia and Slovenia, from 1960s until today Nataša Kump Filip Novokmet April 2018 Top incomes in Croatia and Slovenia, from 1960s until today * Nataša Kump Institute for Economic Research (IER), Ljubljana Filip Novokmet Paris School of Economics (PSE) Abstract The income tax data are used to show that the transition to the market economy has led to a moderate increase in income inequality in Croatia and Slovenia. Inequality increased in the 1990s and stabilized afterwards, with the increase in inequality being mainly driven by the rising shares of top income groups. This development is explained by the ‘gradualist’ transition course. In both Slovenia and Croatia, the slow privatization and the large public sector have contributed to the emergence of labour market institutions that procured low inequality social equilibrium. Further, the substantial importance of the state ownership of the corporate sector in Slovenia and the foreign and state ownership in Croatia has made the concentration of private capital income less pronounced at the top of the income distribution. Finally, new inequality series for Croatia and Slovenia are a valuable contribution in assessing the role and showing the importance of policies and institutions in shaping inequality. * This work is based on the chapter entitled “After self-management: top income shares in Croatia and Slovenia, from the 1960s until today” by F. Novokmet (Novokmet 2017). Nataša Kump: [email protected] ; Filip Novokmet: [email protected] We are especially grateful to Tine Stanovnik and Leonard Kukic for helpful suggestions. Special acknowledgments go to Mirna Valinger, Gordana Marić and Zlatana Kvesić from the Croatian Tax Administration for the preparation of the Croatian income tax data used in this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Croatia, 2014-2020
    HR Land of unfulfilled clean energy potential Climate action in EU Cohesion Policy funding for Croatia, 2014-2020 ‘Climate’s enfants terribles: how new Member States’ misguided use of EU funds is holding back Europe’s clean energy transition’ 143 SUMMARY • The National Renewable Energy Action Plan does not lines for new RES sources and a more integrated strategic foresee new installations by 2020 for solar and wind RES, approach in order to match the existing and future RES though financing opportunities would enable new investment interest from the private or business sector. installations if there were free quotas available. • There is a need for the development of a new national • Croatia’s 2020 energy targets contradict the current trend energy strategy which will take into account new RES of a decrease in energy consumption and GHG market demand and lower energy consumption. The new emissions, while its planned fossil fuel installations block strategy should also have a stronger vision towards 2030 the decarbonisation pathway. and 2050, creating an energy efficient, renewable energy- based economy in Croatia. • The Partnership Agreement falls short on horizontal integration of climate considerations, neglecting legal BACK TO THE FUTURE: REALITY FAR MORE requirements. POSITIVE THAN 2009 PLANS, BUT CROATIA STILL LACKING AMBITIONS FOR SUSTAINABLE ENERGY • Funding for transmission and road transport is not in line with the stated priorities. Energy production, consumption and transmission in Croatia (energy mix): leaking and unsustainable • The EU funds’ spending plans, however, do go beyond national ambitions. Efforts should be made in order to Regarding energy production from renewable sources, the increase investments in transmission and distribution Republic of Croatia is, according to the Partnership Agreement, GRAPH 74: Electricity generation mix 2013 in Croatia.
    [Show full text]
  • Socio-Spatial Patterns of the Contemporary Second Home Phenomenon in Croatia
    https://doi.org/10.5559/di.26.1.05 SOCIO-SPATIAL PATTERNS OF THE CONTEMPORARY SECOND HOME PHENOMENON IN CROATIA Geran-Marko MILETIĆ, Krešimir PERAČKOVIĆ, Marica MARINOVIĆ GOLUBIĆ Institute of Social Sciences Ivo Pilar, Zagreb UDK: 316.334.54(497.5) 316.343(497.5) Izvorni znanstveni rad Primljeno: 18. 7. 2016. Second home use as a specific dwelling practice has a long history in Croatia. The number of second homes has been continuously growing in Croatia for more than 50 years, regardless of the long-term economic crises and regressive socio-historical processes. In this article, based on empirical data collected by a survey and the most recent national Census, we explore the basic features of the second home phenomenon focusing on characteristics of second home users, patterns of second home location and frequency of use. The obtained data shows that Croatian households that own a second home represent a heterogeneous group and that this phenomenon is not associated exclusively with affluent and/or retired house- holds. Furthermore, second homes are more often located in a certain type of settlement – peripheral, rural and small settle- ments are more desirable locations and more than half of the respondents use their second homes at least on a monthly basis. Keywords: second homes, temporary inhabitants, social structure, counterurbanisation, Croatia Geran-Marko Miletić, Institute of Social Sciences Ivo Pilar, Marulićev trg 19/1, P. O. Box 277, 10 001 Zagreb, Croatia. E-mail: Geran.Marko.Miletic @pilar.hr INTRODUCTION Second home use, or temporary occupancy of an additional prope rty exclusively for leisure and recreation, is a global social phenomenon and has a long tradition particularly on the Eu- 79 ropean continent (Claval, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • 2 World Art Games
    2 nd World Art Games WORLD GAMES 2015 ART Bratislava/Slovakia GAMES September 1st 9 th 2015 The biggest gathering of artists all art disciplines wagames.org WC R O A T I A G JUNE xx - JULY xx 2 0 1 5 WORLD ART GAMES S L O V A K I A 2 0 1 5 WORLD ART GAMES S L O V A K I A 2 0 1 5 WORLD ART GAMES SLOVAKIA PUBLISHED BY WORLD ART GAMES World Art Games Organization FOR THE PUBLISHER Co-President Peter Weisz Co-President Jasminka Blažević Paunović TECHNICAL EDITOR Branko Penić PRINT Arta, Nova Gradiška ISBN: 953-95057-4-7 W O R L D A R T G A M E S - 2 0 1 5 W O R L D A R T G A M E S - 2 0 1 5 WORLD ART GAMES SLOVAKIA PUBLISHED BY WORLD ART GAMES World Art Games Organization FOR THE PUBLISHER Co-President Peter Weisz Co-President Jasminka Blažević Paunović TECHNICAL EDITOR Branko Penić PRINT Arta, Nova Gradiška ISBN: 953-95057-4-7 W O R L D A R T G A M E S - 2 0 1 5 W O R L D A R T G A M E S - 2 0 1 5 V I S I O N : Being the world's leading independent organization in the field of modern arts, art and culture M I S S I O N : · to establish committees in all states and therefore to connect artists of all artistic disciplines into a powerful NET, which will enable them larger recognition, professional development, education, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Rights Do Not Recognize Political Ideology!
    EDITA MIFTARI HUMAN RIGHTS DO NOT RECOGNIZE POLITICAL IDEOLOGY! Political Parties and the Human Rights of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender People Edita Miftari Human Rights do not Recognize Political Ideology: Political Parties and the Human Rights of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender People Sarajevo, 2015 Human Rights Series Editor of the series: Emina Bošnjak Publication no. 34 title: (original title) Ljudska prava ne poznaju političku ideologiju: Političke stranke i njihov angažman na pravima lezbejki, gejeva, biseksualnih i transrodnih osoba Human Rights do not Recognize Political Ideology: Political Parties and the Human Rights of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender People author: Edita Miftari editors: Saša Gavrić, Emina Bošnjak translation (ENG): Edita Miftari proofreading (ENG): Selma Asotić design_layout: Lejla Huremović publisher: Sarajevski otvoreni centar, www.soc.ba for the publisher: Saša Gavrić © Sarajevski otvoreni centar Non-commercial copying, photocopying, or any other reproduction of this publication in whole or in part is desirable, and possible with the previous written consent of the publisher. Please contact us at [email protected]. This publication is made possible by the generous support of the American people through the United States Embassy in Bosnia and Herzegovina. The contents are the responsibility of Sarajevo Open Centre and the author, and do not necessarily reflect the views of the U.S. Embassy or the United States Government. ISBN 978-9958-536-25-0 Edita Miftari Human Rights do not Recognize Political Ideology: Political Parties and the Human Rights of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender People Sarajevo, 2015 CIP - Katalogizacija u publikaciji Nacionalna i univerzitetska biblioteka Bosne i Hercegovine, Sarajevo 342.726:613.885]:329(497.6) MIFTARI, Edita Human rights do not recognize political ideology : political parties and the human rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people / Edita Miftari ; [translation Edita Miftari].
    [Show full text]