United States Attorney's Office Central District Of
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
United States Attorney’s Office Central District of California ANNUAL REPORT January 2015 – December 2015 Eileen M. Decker United States Attorney TABLE OF CONTENTS FROM THE DESK OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY.…………………………….……….3 CASES……………………………………………………………………………………………………...4 APPEALS…………………………………………………………………………………………..4 CIVIL RIGHTS……..……………………………………………………………………………...6 COMMUNITY SAFETY…………………………………………………………………………..8 CRIMES AGAINST CHILDREN………………………………………………………………...10 CRIMES AGAINST THE GOVERNMENT…………………………………………………….12 Immigration Fraud………………………………………………………………………....14 Export Controls…………………………………………………………………………....15 CYBER………………………………………………………………………………………….....16 ENVIRONMENTAL……………………………………………………………………………..18 FRAUD…………………………………………………………………………………………....20 Bank Fraud………………………………………………………………………………...20 Embezzlement …………………………………………………………………………….21 Healthcare Fraud……………………………………………………………………….......22 Identity Theft………………………………………………………………………….…...25 Securities Fraud……………………………………………………………………….…....26 Investment Fraud…………………………………………………………………….…….27 Real Estate Fraud…………………………………………………………………….…......30 Mortgage Adjustment Fraud………………………………………………………….…......31 GENERAL CIVIL…………………………………………………………………………….…...33 HUMAN TRAFFICKING………………………………………………………………………....38 PRESCRIPTION DRUG ABUSE…………………………………………………………………39 PUBLIC CORRUPTION…………………………………………………………………………..41 Embezzlement……………………………………………………………………………...42 TAX FRAUD……………………………………………………………………………………....43 1 TERRORISM……………………………………………………………………………………...45 VIOLENT CRIME………………………………………………………………………………..47 Drug Trafficking…………………………………………………………………………...47 Money Laundering………………………………………………………………………....48 Racketeering……………………………………………………………………………......48 Gang Violence……………………………………………………………………………...49 Weapons Offenses……………………………………………………………………….....50 Sexual Assault………………………………………………………………………….........50 Extortion………………………………………………………………………….................50 SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT AND REENTRY PROGRAM (STAR)…………………................51 CONFINEMENT AND SENTENCING ALTERNATIVES (CASA)……………………………..............51 COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT 2015………………………………………………………………........52 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS……………………………………………………………………………….53 THIS YEAR END REPORT IS INTENDED SOLELY AS A PARTIAL LISTING OF THE 2015 CASEWORK OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY’S OFFICE FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA. NOTHING IN THIS REPORT IS INTENDED TO REPRERESENT THE OFFICIAL POSITION OF THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE OR THE U.S. ATTORNEY’S OFFICE. IT HAS NO REGULATORY EFFECT, AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS OR REMEDIES. 2 From the desk of Eileen M. Decker United States Attorney I was honored to return to the United States Attorney’s Office for the Central District of California in 2015. My nearly 15 years as an Assistant United States Attorney were incredibly rewarding, and it is a privilege to be leading such a distinguished group of AUSAs, paralegals, and staff who are dedicated to the highest standards of ethics, professionalism, and excellence. Our Office has always been at the forefront of the Department of Justice, leading the way in civil, criminal, national security, and tax cases. This past year was no different. Whether the subject matter was terrorism, violent crime, the financial crisis, tax fraud, or civil rights, the Office brought major cases with nationwide ramifications. Because I believe the cases speak for themselves, we have summarized some of our 2015 cases into this Annual Report. For AUSAs, former AUSAs, law enforcement, and members of the community too busy to keep up our daily work, we hope this Annual Report will provide a glimpse of the breadth, scope, and depth of our efforts in 2015. Last year, we re-structured parts of our Office. We created the National Security Division (“NSD”), the first of its kind in the nation, consisting of the Terrorism and Export Crimes and Cyber and Intellectual Property Crimes Sections. In addition to prosecuting criminal cases, the NSD also works with our law enforcement partners to disrupt and prevent attacks aimed at undermining our national security. Protecting our District from terrorist and cyber threats remains our highest priority. In 2015, our Criminal, Civil and Tax Divisions were also incredibly productive. For example, 2015 saw the $1.375 billion dollar settlement with Standard and Poor’s for inflating the ratings of mortgage-backed securities during the housing boom, which then fueled the financial crisis of 2008. When combined with the Office’s role in obtaining the $16.65 billion dollar settlement with Bank of America in late 2014, there can be no doubt that the Office leads the nation in holding financial institutions accountable for the actions that contributed to the national financial crisis. These cases, combined with the corporate fraud, ponzi schemes, tax fraud, health care fraud, and other fraud cases described in this report, demonstrate our steadfast commitment to addressing the many variations of fraud that unfortunately take place in our District. Our violent crime sections worked hard to address the growing violent crime problem that some areas of our District are experiencing. As outlined in this report, these sections focused on drug cartels, international drug trafficking, human trafficking, prescription drug abuse, gang violence, crimes against children, and organized crime. Working with the violent crime prosecutors, our assest forfeiture team seized instrumentalities of the crime in order to prevent future criminal conduct. We recognize the positive impact effective prosecutions can have on the communities we serve, and strive to make all of our neighborhoods safe from violence. We are committed to doing more in this area during 2016, which includes being an active part of DOJ’s Violence Reduction Network. During 2015, the Office also made landmark gains in addressing civil rights issues, including the indictment of a number of current and former Sheriff’s Deputies, both for civil rights violations in the jails, and for attemping to obstruct the investigation into those abuses. The Office also reached an agreement with the Los Angeles Sheriff’s Department to achieve reform in the jails and to prevent history from repeating itself. Protecting the residents of the District necessarily entails protecting them from those who do harm to our environment. Those who violated environmental safeguards continued to be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. Throughout all of our efforts, our appeals team provides advice and counsel on all significant issues and seamlessly guides us through all of our appellate work. I have only scratched the surface of the Office’s accomplishments in 2015. We remain committed to justice, fairness and service at the U.S. Attorney’s Office. While 2016 will bring new challenges, the dedicated women and men in this Office will continue to work to improve the lives of citizens in our community through effective and fair prosecutions of criminal conduct and civil enforcement. 3 United States Attorney’s Office January 2015 – December 2015 Central District of California ANNUAL REPORT 2015 convictions and sentences on almost every conceivable ground by raising, in the Ninth Circuit’s words, “a staggering number of issues” (40 unique substantive Appeals issues and several dozen additional sub-issues). The Ninth Circuit affirmed the most-important convictions The work of the U.S. Attorney’s Office on against the most-important defendants in a 123-page appeals to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the published opinion accompanied by a 33-page Ninth Circuit is as diverse as its work in trial unpublished decision, rejecting all of the defendants’ courts. With a staff of dedicated professional claims except two based on controlling Ninth Circuit appellate lawyers supervising the appellate work decisions issued while the appeals were pending and of the Office’s trial-level attorneys or handling reaching dozens of broadly applicable precedential many of the Office’s appeals themselves, the holdings of tremendous utility to federal prosecutors in Office not only works hard to see that its trial- the Ninth Circuit. level victories are affirmed and that erroneous adverse decisions are corrected but that precedent helpful to future prosecutions and civil For a client who ended up cheating 86 victims out of matters is developed. over $20 million in a mail-fraud and Ponzi scheme, a big-firm lawyer defendant, among other things, prepared false and misleading private placement In United States v. Christensen, 801 F.3d 970 (9th Cir. memoranda in support of the Ponzi scheme, later 2015), juries in two separate trials that spanned six altered and backdated them to make them appear to months convicted six defendants (including a named contain adequate disclosures, and then provided the partner of an over-250-lawyer Los Angeles law firm and altered versions to the Securities and Exchange a Los Angeles Police Department sergeant) of various Commission after it conducted a surprise audit of the crimes for their involvement in the Pellicano offending financial firm. For this and the attorney- Investigative Agency’s (a Los Angeles private defendant’s other related conduct, the district court investigation firm that catered to wealthy and celebrity convicted him at a bench trial of serving as an accessory clients) acquisition of confidential law enforcement and after the fact and various obstruction related offenses. telephone company information and wiretapping of In United States v. Tamman, 782 F.3d 543 (9th Cir. 2015), investigative targets so that, in many