Aharon Hakohen the Gilgul of Haran Achieved Tikun for Haran Who Was Incinerated to Sanctify the Holy Name Not L’Shmah

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Aharon Hakohen the Gilgul of Haran Achieved Tikun for Haran Who Was Incinerated to Sanctify the Holy Name Not L’Shmah Rabbi Pinches Friedman Parshas Ki Sisa 5776 Translation by Dr. Baruch Fox ”מה גדלו מעשיך ה’ מאד עמקו מחשבותיך“ Aharon HaKohen the Gilgul of Haran Achieved Tikun for Haran Who Was Incinerated to Sanctify the Holy Name Not L’shmah Aharon Was the Gilgul and the Tikun of Haran In this week’s parsha, parshas Ki Sisa, it is fitting that we examine why the Almighty arranged for the holy personage of Aharon HaKohen to be subjected to the devastating ordeal of making the We will begin our investigation with an illuminating revelation eigel. It is quite obvious that this incident cannot be accepted at from the Arizal, which provides us with a glimpse into the face value—that Aharon simply failed this daunting test. After all, wondrous ways of Hashem. Hashem reincarnates neshamot in HKB”H demonstrates his confidence in Aharon by choosing him order to rectify them, so that no neshamah will ever be cast away. to be the Kohen Gadol—to perform the demanding Yom Kippur Thus, the Arizal teaches us that Aharon HaKohen was a gilgul “בני עמרם service in the Holy of Holies. Furthermore, Scriptures itself attests providing tikun for Haran, the brother of Avraham. Recall that he אהרן ומשה, ויבדל אהרן להקדישו קודש קדשים, הוא ובניו עד עולם, להקטיר לפני ה’ to his outstanding character (Divrei HaYamim I 23, 13): sacrificed his life in Ur Kasdim in order to sanctify the holy name; the sons of Amram, Aharon and Moshe; however, his act was not completely sincere; it possessed an—לשרתו ולברך בשמו עד עולם” Haran died—“וימת הרן על פני תרח אביו בארץ מולדתו באור כשדים” and Aharon was set apart to sanctify him as holy of holies, he element of “lo l’shmah.” For, we learn in parshas Noach (Bereishis in the presence of Terach his father, in his native land, in Ur and his descendants forever, to burn offerings before Hashem, 11, 28): to serve Him and to bless in His name forever. Kasdim. “על פני תרח:Aggadah אביו, שעלa Midrash ידי of אביו מת,the name שקיבלin תרח על commentsאברם בנו Rashiלפני נמרוד, על שכתת את צלמיו והשליכו לכבשן האש, והרן יושב ואומר בלבו, אם אברם נוצח אני משלו, ואם נמרוד נוצח אני משלו. וכשניצל אברם אמרו לו להרן, משל מי אתה, אמר Let us review the pesukim recounting how Aharon became להם הרן, משל אברהם אני, השליכוהו לכבשן האש ונשרף, וזהו אור כשדים”. “וירא העם כי :(1 בושש ,32 משה לרדת Shemos) מן eigel ההר, of theויקהל העם על the making אהרן in ויאמרו אליו,involved קום עשה לנו אלהים אשר ילכו לפנינו, כי זה משה האיש אשר העלנו מארץ מצרים לא ידענו מה היה לו. ויאמר אליהם אהרן פרקו נזמי הזהב אשר באזני נשיכם בניכם We learn from the Midrash that Haran’s act of self-sacrifice ובנותיכם והביאו אלי, ויתפרקו כל העם את נזמי הזהב אשר באזניהם ויביאו אל אהרן, ,was tainted. His death came about as a result of his father, Terach ויקח מידם ויצר אותו בחרט ויעשהו עגל מסכה, ויאמרו אלה אלהיך ישראל אשר denouncing Avram for smashing Nimrod’s idols. Haran was העלוך מארץ מצרים”. The people saw that Moshe delayed in descending the initially uncertain as to whom to side with—with Avram or with mountain, and the people gathered around Aharon and said Nimrod. Upon seeing that Avram survived the ordeal of the fiery to him, “Rise up, make for us gods who will go before us; furnace, he chose to side with Avram. They threw him into the for this Moshe, the man who brought us up from the land of furnace and he was incinerated. This is alluded to by the name Ur Egypt—we do not know what became of him!” Aharon said Kasdim; the word “ur” means “fire.” to them, “Remove the golden rings that are in the ears of your According to the Arizal, it was precisely for this reason that wives, your sons, and your daughters, and bring them to me.” Haran subsequently reincarnated into Aharon HaKohen, who The entire people unburdened themselves of the golden rings rectified this shortcoming. Here are the words of our teacher, the “אהרן, ג’ אותיות מן הרן, :(33 ונוסף עליו אות Introduction) א’... ונחזור בענין HaGilgulim אהרן, Sha’arכי in הוא הרן בן,that were in their ears, and brought them to Aharon. He took Arizal אחי אברם, והרן בא לתקן חטא אדם הראשון שעבד עבודה זרה, ולא די שלא תיקן, it from their hands and he bound it in a scarf, and made it אלא שגם עתה לא האמין בה’, אלא עד שיצא אברהם מכבשן האש כמו שאמרו ז”ל, ,into a molten calf; then they said, “This is your god, O Yisrael ולכן נשרף הרן באור כשדים, ואחר כך נתגלגל באהרן לתקן חטא הנזכר”. ”.which brought you up from the land of Egypt Parshas Ki Sisa 5776 | 1 Aharon saw and built a mizbeiach—לפניו ויקרא אהרן ויאמר חג לה’ מחר” ,״הרן״ contains the three letters of the name ״אהרן״ The name with the addition of the letter “aleph.” . Returning to the matter before him; Aharon called out and said, “A festival to Hashem of Aharon, he is Haran, the brother of Avram. Haran came to tomorrow!” He saw make amends for the sin of Adam HaRishon, who worshipped that Chur the son of his sister was rebuking them, and they Rashi comments in the name of the Midrash: —“ויבן מזבח לפניו “ :avodah zarah. Not only did he not make amends, but even on this killed him. This is what is meant by the words occasion, he demonstrated a lack of faith in Hashem, until Avram “And he built a mizbeiach before him,” and he understood from he who was“ —״ וַיִבֶן מִזְָּבּוחַ לפניו״ emerged from the fiery furnace unscathed . Therefore, Haran which can be revowelized was incinerated in Ur Kasdim and subsequently reincarnated slaughtered before him.” Additionally, he saw and said, “Better to read into Aharon, to make amends for the aforementioned sin. that the foulness be attributed to me and not to them.” Regarding the contention that Haran was obligated to make So, Aharon HaKohen chose to make the eigel for the people amends for Adam HaRishon’s sin of avodah zarah, he is referring rather than sacrificing his life for “kedushas Hashem.” He had to the fact that in the commission of the “cheit Eitz HaDa’as,” Adam already witnessed the murder of Chur, who had refused the “כי יודע אלקים כי ביום אכלכם ממנו ונפקחו עיניכם והייתם כאלקים and Chava were deceived by the nachash’s blasphemous words for G-d knows that on the day you eat of it your rabble’s request to make the eigel. Aharon figured that if Yisrael --יודעי טוב ורע” (Bereishis 3, 5): eyes will be opened and you will be like G-d, knowing good and killed him as well, there would be no hope of saving them or bad. “Every craftsman hates others of his craft; remedying their transgressions. The Gemara explains the matter “וירא אהרן ויבן מזבח לפניו, מה ראה, אמר רבי :(7a בנימין בר יפת Sanhedrin) אמר רבי follows אלעזר,G-d ate from the tree and created the world. Thus, you will be as Rashi explains: ראה חור שזבוח לפניו, אמר אי לא שמענא להו השתא, עבדו לי כדעבדו בחור, ומיקיים ”.like G-d, creators of worlds בי )איכה ב-כ( אם יהרג במקדש ה’ כהן ונביא, ולא הויא להו תקנתא לעולם, מוטב דליעבדו לעגל, אפשר הויא להו תקנתא בתשובה”. Clearly, there is no greater blasphemy than believing the nachash’s lies that it is possible to be like G-d. “Aharon saw and built a mizbeiach before him.” What did This is the basis of the Arizal’s contention that as a gilgul of he see? Rabbi Binyamin the son of Yefes said in the name of Adam HaRishon—who was guilty of the sin of avodah zarah— Rabbi Elazar: He saw Chur slaughtered before him. He figured: Haran was required to sacrifice his life and be consumed by the If I do not do as they wish, they will now do to me what they fire for the sake of “kedushas Hashem.” Yet, his act was not truly did to Chur, and they will fulfill through me the words of the “l’shem shamayim,” since he did not choose to enter the furnace passuk (Eichah 2, 20): “Should a kohen and a navi be killed until he saw that Avram emerged unharmed; he assumed that in the Sanctuary of Hashem.” As a consequence, there will he would emerge from the fire unharmed as well. Therefore, never be a remedy for them; therefore, it is preferable that אהר”ן he reincarnated into Aharon HaKohen to make amends for the they make an eigel—leaving open the possibility that they הר”ן aforementioned sin. This is alluded to by the name , which is will have a remedy by means of teshuvah.” with the addition of an “aleph.” Now, however, it behooves us to explore: (1) How exactly did Aharon make amends for Haran’s defective act of self-sacrifice? He Furthermore, we find a tremendous chiddush in the Midrash did not sacrifice his life as Chur did by refusing to make the eigel. (V.R. 10, 3). Aharon accepted upon himself the blame for making In fact, he actually made the eigel, thereby facilitating the people’s the eigel in order to save Yisrael from extermination. In this merit, avodah zarah. (2) From the words of the Arizal, it is apparent that the HKB”H chose him to be the Kohen Gadol, the one who performs “aleph” added to Haran’s name to form Aharon is instrumental in the the service on Yom HaKippurim in the Kodesh HaKodashim.
Recommended publications
  • The Soul of a Jew and the Soul of a Non-Jew an Inconvenient Truth and the Search for an Alternative
    47 The Soul of a Jew and the Soul of a Non-Jew An Inconvenient Truth and the Search for an Alternative By: HANAN BALK Holiness is not found in the human being in essence unless he sanctifies himself. According to his preparation for holiness, so the fullness comes upon him from on High. A person does not acquire holiness while inside his mother. He is not holy from the womb, but has to labor from the very day he comes into the air of the world. 1 Introduction: The Soul of a Jew is Superior to that of a Non-Jew The view expressed in the above heading—as uncomfortable and racially charged as it may be in the minds of some—was undoubtedly, as we shall show, the prominent position maintained by authorities of Jewish thought throughout the ages, and continues to be so even today. While Jewish mysticism is the source and primary expositor of this theory, it has achieved a ubiquitous presence not only in the writings of Kabbalists,2 but also in the works of thinkers found in the libraries of most observant Jews, who hardly consider themselves followers of Kabbalah. Clearly, for one committed to the Torah and its principles, it is not tenable to presume that so long as he is not a Kabbalist, such a belief need not be a part of his religious worldview. Is there an alternative view that is an equally authentic representation of Jewish thought on the subject? In response to this question, we will 1 R. Simhạ Bunim of Przysukha, Kol Simha,̣ Parshat Miketz, p.
    [Show full text]
  • The Archetype of the Tzaddiq in Hasidic Tradition
    THE ARCHETYPE OF THE TZADDIQ IN HASIDIC TRADITION A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE DEPARTMENT OF RELIGION AT THE UNIVERSITY OF MANITOBA IN CONJUNCTION wlTH THE DEPARTMENT OF RELIGIOUS STUDIES AT THE UNIVERSITY OF WINNIPEG IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS BY YA'QUB IBN YUSUF August4, 1992 National Library B¡bliothèque nat¡onale E*E du Canada Acquisitions and D¡rection des acquisilions et B¡bliographic Services Branch des services bibliograPhiques 395 Wellinolon Slreêl 395, rue Wellington Oflawa. Oñlario Ottawa (Ontario) KlA ON4 K1A ON4 foùt t¡te vat¡e ¡élëte^ce Ou l¡te Nate élëtenæ The author has granted an L'auteur a accordé une licence irrevocable non-exclusive licence irrévocable et non exclusive allowing the National Library of permettant à la Bibliothèque Canada to reproduce, loan, nationale du Canada de distribute or sell cop¡es of reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou his/her thesis by any means and vendre des copies de sa thèse in any form or format, making de quelque manière et sous this thesis available to interested quelque forme que ce soit pour persons. mettre des exemplaires de cette thèse à la disposition des personnes intéressées. The author retains ownership of L'auteur conserve la propriété du the copyright in his/her thesis. droit d'auteur qui protège sa Neither the thesis nor substantial thèse. Ni la thèse ni des extraits extracts from it may be printed or substantiels de celle-ci ne otherwise reproduced without doivent être imprimés ou his/her permission. autrement reproduits sans son autorisation, ïsBN ø-315-7796Ø-S
    [Show full text]
  • Gilgul and Reincarnation in Zohar
    HAMAKOM YINACHEM ETCHEM CHORUS: HaMakom yinachem etchem HaMakom yinachen etchen HaMakom yinachem etchem B’toch sha’ar avlei tzion v’yerushalayim. In times when we are troubled By losses we must face The soul will bleed As we grieve Sorrow cuts its own pace.!! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!CHORUS: We’ll miss their smiles, touch, and smell The hands we once held Love lives on With memories strong Spirit dances beyond the veil.!! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!CHORUS: May you be comforted on your journey May you feel what you need to feel Let seeds be planted Of hope and consolation May you find the time to heal.!! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!CHORUS: This song by Geela Rayzel Raphael is based upon the traditional greetings to mourners following a funeral and at a shiva house. For music see Geela Rayzel Raphael, May the Angels Carry You - Jewish Songs of Comfort for Death, Dying and Mourning, www.Shechinah.com 17 GILGUL AND REINCARNATION IN ZOHAR AND LURIANIC KABBALAH HEINRICH GRAETZ ON KABBALAH & JEWISH MYSTICISM: JEWISH MYSTICAL IDEAS -> “a corruptive force throughout Jewish history” “malignant growth in the body of Judaism” KABBALAH -> “empty kabbalah could not fail to arouse enthusiasm in empty heads.” ZOHAR -> “occasionally offering a faint suggestion of an idea, which in a trice evaporates in a feverish fancies or childish silliness” HASIDISM -> “a new sect, a daughter of darkness, born in gloom, which even today proceeds stealthily on its mysterious way … [plunging east European Jewry] into a primitive state of barbarism.” (esp. Vol. IV of History of the Jews) GILGUL IN THE EVENING
    [Show full text]
  • Kabbalah Kabbalah - by the Blessing of G-D H”B with the Knowledge of Heaven D”Sb Contents Everything Belongs to Hashem
    Kabbalah Kabbalah - By the blessing of G-d h”b With the knowledge of heaven d”sb Contents Everything belongs to Hashem. }”hl Kabbalah - Title Page Kabbalah Meditation from Torah to Self-improvement to Prophecy ● I. Introduction hawbn la rswm la hrwt }m twnnwbth hlbq ● II. Torah Prophetic Truth and Version - 11/1/2001 Talmudic Dialectic Hermeneutical This work in progress is intended to train one to experience authentic Reality kabbalah. Study the manual by browsing the table of contents, links, ● III. The Written Law and footnotes. Let your spirit be your guide and Ribono Shel Olam (the ❍ A. Torah Master of the World) will reveal what you need to learn next. The work ■ 1. Bereshis -- In the focuses on learning kabbalah through character improvement through Beginning – Genesis the theoretical, meditative, and practical kabbalah. While I have written down some of my own kabbalistic journeys, in the final analysis one ■ a) Parsha Bereshsis must choose his own path and with the blessing of G-d reveal another truth path to the Infinite. ■ b) Parsha Noach This work uses a Hebrew true-type font that should be downloaded and ■ c) Parsha Lech installed on a PC to view the work correctly. To install the Hebrew true L’hah type font: ■ 2. Shemot - Names - Exodus ● Open location heb_tt.zip ● ■ a) Parsha Save the file to a location on your disc Terumah ● Double click on heb_tt.zip and extract files to a directory ● Double click on Install_Hebrew.ttf.vbs ■ 3. Vayikra - And Called - Leviticus ■ 4. Bamidbar - In the Your Hebrew fonts should now be installed.
    [Show full text]
  • Reincarnation
    Reincarnation Introduction to Reincarnation Reincarnation, literally "to be made flesh again" is a doctrine or mystical belief that some essential part of a living being (in some variations only human beings) survives death to be reborn in a new body. This essential part is often referred to as the Spirit or Soul, the 'Higher or True Self', 'Divine Spark', 'I' or the 'Ego' (not to be confused with the ego as defined by psychology). According to such beliefs, a new personality is developed during each life in the physical world, but some part of the being remains constantly present throughout these successive lives as well. Belief in reincarnation is an ancient phenomenon. This doctrine is a central tenet within the majority of Indian religious traditions, such as Hinduism (including Yoga, Vaishnavism, and Shaivism), Jainism, and Sikhism. The idea was also entertained by some Ancient Greek philosophers. Many modern Pagans also believe in reincarnation as do some New Age movements, along with followers of Spiritism, practitioners of certain African traditions, and students of esoteric philosophies. The Buddhist concept of Rebirth although often referred to as reincarnation differs significantly from the Hindu-based traditions and New Age movements in that the "self" (or soul) does not reincarnate. © 2014 All Star Training, Inc. 1 Eastern religions and traditions Eastern philosophical and religious beliefs regarding the existence or non-existence of an enduring 'self' have a direct bearing on how reincarnation is viewed within a given tradition. There are large differences in philosophical beliefs regarding the nature of the soul (also known as the jiva or atma) amongst the Dharmic Religions such as Hinduism and Buddhism.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewish Mourning Traditions
    JEWISH MOURNING TRADITIONS Shmira / The Vigil (From Chevra Kadisha) When a person dies, the soul or neshama hovers around the body. This neshama is the essence of the person, the consciousness and totality, the thoughts, deeds, experiences and relationships. The body was its container and the neshama, now on the way to the Eternal World, refuses to leave until the body is buried. In effect, the totality of the person who died continues to exist for a while in the vicinity of the body. Jewish mourning ritual is therefore most concerned with the feelings of the deceased, not only the feelings of the mourners. How we treat the body and how we behave around the body must reflect how we would act around the very person himself. IMMEDIATELY AFTER DEATH Jacob is promised that when he dies, “Joseph’s hand shall close your eyes.” (Genesis 46:4). The 16th century “Code of Jewish Law” dictated that the eyes should be closed, arms and hands extended and brought close to the body and the lower jaw closed and bound. The body was placed on the floor, with the feet towards the door. The body was covered with a sheet and a lit candle placed near the head. The Midrash states that on Shabbat one does not close the eyes, bind the jaw or light a candle. Some Jewish communities would place potsherds on the eyes; Russians placed coins. Ancient superstitions in many cultures held that if the eyes were opened, the ghost of the deceased would return to fetch away another of the household.
    [Show full text]
  • “Why the Geese Shrieked” Isaac Bashevis Singer's
    “WHY THE GEESE SHRIEKED” ISAAC BASHEVIS SINGER’S WORK BETWEEN MYSTICISM AND SCEPTICISM Khayke Beruriah Wiegand ABSTRACT: In a chapter of his memoirs, the acclaimed Yiddish writer Isaac Bashevis Singer grants his readers some insight into the life of his father’s rabbinic household in Warsaw – a household full of contrasts and tensions between his parents’ conflicting personalities, between Hasidic and Mitnagdic tendencies and between mysticism and scepticism. Both his father’s mysticism and his mother’s scepticism were formative influences on Bashevis, and his writing constantly vacillates between these two world-views. Bashevis is well-known for his short stories about demons, dybbuks and other supernatural phenomena, but it is interesting to note that at times his demons clearly seem to be external manifestations of internal, psychological states of being, whereas at other times no rational explanation for an apparent supernatural phenomenon can be found. Bashevis’s narrators and protagonists constantly question God and express their scepticism about traditional Jewish beliefs, while, on the other hand, they are deeply influenced by Jewish mystical ideas. The conflict between rationalism and mysticism, between modern philosophy and Jewish religious beliefs, especially Kabbalistic ideas, never gets resolved in Bashevis’s works, but this continuous tension is exactly what makes Bashevis such a great writer! In My Father’s Court), entitled) מײַ ן טאַטנס בית-דין שטוב In the second chapter of his memoirs Why the Geese Shrieked”), the acclaimed Yiddish writer Isaac“) ”פאַרװאָס די גענדז האָבן געשריגן“ Bashevis Singer (1904 – 1991) grants his readers some significant insight into the life of his father’s rabbinic household on Krokhmalne-gas (ulica Krochmalna) in Warsaw, a household full of contrasts and tensions between his parents’ conflicting personalities, between Hasidic and Mitnagdic tendencies and between mysticism and scepticism.1 Bashevis’s father, Rabbi Pinkhes-Mendl Zinger, was descended from an illustrious line of rabbis, scholars and Kabbalists.
    [Show full text]
  • In the First Generationhaskalah Literature
    Isaac Euchel: Tradition and Change in the First Generation Haskalah Literature in Germany (I) I SAAC EUCHEL' should be distinguished for his many contributions to modern Hebrew literature, and should be given proper credit for his many "firsts" in the Haskalah movement in Germany during the last quarter of the eighteenth century. He is regarded by many as the initiator of the Hebrew periodical press, being the first editor of Hame'asef; although others give Moses Mendelssohn the credit for starting the first Hebrew periodical, Qohelet Musar. It was Mendelssohn who became the subject of Euchel's other "first," that of a biographer. For Euchel is the author of a full biography of the so-called Jewish Socrates, first serialized in Hame'asefJ and Biographies, biographical sketches and notes on Isaac Euchel [or Eichel] could be found in the following works (arranged in chronological order), in addition to works cited later on in this study: Meir Halevi LETTERIS, "Toldot Hehacham R. Itzik Eichel Z.L.," [The Life Story ofthe Sage Rabbi Isaac Euchel*], in the second edition of Hame'asef I (1784), published in Wien in 1862, pp. 41-47, the first biography of Euchel, which contains some inaccuracies. Letteris republished this biography, with slight changes, in his Zikaron Basefer [Memoirs in the Book] (Wien, 1869), pp. 90-97, Samuel Joseph FODNN, Kneset Yisra'el [The Assembly of Israel] (Warsaw, 1886), p.96. Zalman REJZEN, Lexiconfun der Yudisher Literaturun Presse (Warsaw, 1914), ss. 42-43 [Yiddish]. The Jewish Encyclopedia, V (New York & London, 1916), p. 265 [article by A. Ko._Adolf KOHUT].
    [Show full text]
  • Forsaken HBI Series on Jewish Women
    Forsaken HBI Series on Jewish Women Shulamit Reinharz, General Editor Sylvia Barack Fishman, Associate Editor Th e HBI Series on Jewish Women, created by the Hadassah-Brandeis Institute, publishes a wide range of books by and about Jewish women in diverse contexts and time periods. Of interest to scholars and the educated public, the HBI Series on Jewish Women fi lls major gaps in Jewish tudiesS and in Women and Gender Studies as well as their intersection. Th e HBI Series on Jewish Women is supported by a generous gift from Dr. Laura S. Schor. For the complete list of books that are available in this series, please see www.upne.com Sharon Faye Koren, Forsaken: Th e Menstruant in Medieval Jewish Mysticism Sonja M. Hedgepeth and Rochelle G. Saidel, editors, Sexual Violence against Jewish Women during the Holocaust Julia R. Lieberman, editor, Sephardi Family Life in the Early Modern Diaspora Derek Rubin, editor, Promised Lands: New Jewish American Fiction on Longing and Belonging Carol K. Ingall, editor, Th e Women Who Reconstructed American Jewish Education: 1910–1965 Gaby Brimmer and Elena Poniatowska, Gaby Brimmer: An Autobiography in Th ree Voices Harriet Hartman and Moshe Hartman, Gender and American Jews: Patt erns in Work, Education, and Family in Contemporary Life Dvora E. Weisberg, Levirate Marriage and the Family in Ancient Judaism Ellen M. Umansky and Dianne Ashton, editors, Four Centuries of Jewish Women’s Spirituality: A Sourcebook Carole S. Kessner, Marie Syrkin: Values Beyond the Self Ruth Kark, Margalit Shilo, and Galit Hasan-Rokem,
    [Show full text]
  • The Ohr Somayach Torah Magazine on the Internet • O H R N E T Shabbat Parshat Vayakhel-Shekalim • 17 Adar I 5763 • Feb
    THE OHR SOMAYACH TORAH MAGAZINE ON THE INTERNET • WWW.OHR.EDU O H R N E T SHABBAT PARSHAT VAYAKHEL-SHEKALIM • 17 ADAR I 5763 • FEB. 22, 2003 • VOL. 10 NO. 21 THIS ISSUE IS SPONSORED BY KOF-K KOSHER SUPERVISION • WWW.KOF-K.ORG • [email protected] PARSHA INSIGHTS ble and adaptable as we were as children. IF YOU THINK YOU’RE If you ask someone to define a talmid chacham, he’ll probably tell you it’s someone who has a large and deep COMPLETE, YOU’RE FINISHED knowledge of the Torah. “The cherubim…their faces toward one another.” (37:9) True. However, literally, a talmid chacham translates as o you know where the word “Cherub” comes “a student of a sage.” from? Cherub comes from the Hebrew kruv. The In Judaism, the essence of being a sage is to always be a Dkruvim were solid gold statues extruded from the student. A talmid chacham, by definition, is someone who cover of the Aron Hakodesh (the Holy Ark) which con- never stops learning, who never feels himself complete tained the Torah and the Tablets of the Covenant. Kruv is but is constantly growing in Torah, in character, and in his related to the Aramaic word – k’ravia – which means “like awareness of G-d. A person who does this makes himself a child.” They were called kruvim because they both had a vehicle through which holiness descends to the world. the face of child. The biggest insult in the Yiddish vocabulary of a great Why? sage of the previous generation was that someone was a A child is like a new immigrant.
    [Show full text]
  • Jewishtimes Issue 185A
    Despite opinions endorsing reincarnation (gilgul) God told Adam he will return to dust. (Gen. 3:19) A Rabbi vs. God: you choose. Also of interest: those creations that go through a metamorphosis still die with no return. How much more so will man remain dead who doesn’t possess any metamorphic design. 1997 Dedicated to Scriptural and Rabbinic Verification 2009 of Authentic Jewish Beliefs and Practices YEARS Volume VIII, No. 29...July 10, 2009 www.mesora.org/jewishtimes Download and Print Free 0U;OPZ0ZZ\e Letters Parsha: pinchas 1-5 Reincarnation 1,6,7 Reincarnation 8,9 the LK\JH[PUNZjewishtimes Reincarnation: worldwide A Fact Arrived at through Rational Study? Or Simply a Cherished Belief? (page 6) QVPUPU[OLTP[a]HO www.mesora.org/donate JHUKSLSPNO[PUN7/ Boston 8:04 Moscow 8:54 Chicago 8:09 New York 8:11 Cleveland 8:44 Paris 9:35 Detroit 8:52 Philadelphia 8:13 Houston 8:07 Phoenix 7:23 Jerusalem 7:29 Pittsburgh 8:33 Johannesburg 5:13 Seattle 8:49 Los Angeles 7:48 Sydney 4:46 London 8:57 Tokyo 6:41 Miami 7:57 Toronto 8:42 Montreal 8:25 Washington DC 8:17 PinchasWeekly Parsha YHIIPILYUPLMV_ Hashem’s Covenant of Peace with Pinchas Therefore say that I give to him my FRYHQDQW RI SHDFH¬ ¬ %H0LGEDU 7KH FORVLQJ SDVVDJHV RI 3DUVKDW %DODNSURYLGHDQLQWURGXFWLRQWRRXU (continued on next page) Volume VIII, No. 29...July 10, 2009 www.Mesora.org/JewishTimes (Pinchas cont. from pg. 1) Weekly Parsha SDUDVKD¬:RPHQIURPWKHQDWLRQVRI0RDYDQG ,Q RUGHU WR DQVZHU WKHVH TXHVWLRQV ZH PXVW 0LG\DQ HQWHU WKH FDPS RI %QDL<LVUDHO¬ 7KHVH UHHYDOXDWHWKHHYHQWVGHVFULEHGDERYH¬7KHEHKDY-
    [Show full text]
  • The Cabala and Its Influence on Judaism and Christianity. Bernhard Pick
    10 $1.00 per Year JUNE, 1911 Price, Cents XTbe ©pen Court A MONTHLY MAGAZINE 2>evoteb to tbe Science ot iRelfaion, tbe "Religion of Science, anb tbe Extension of tbe "Religious parliament loea Founded by Edward C. Hegeler. mw^^_ ft^* 9421.1' BUDDHA AS A FISHER OF MEN. (See page 357.) Zbc ©pen Court publishing Company CHICAGO LONDON: Kegan Paul, Trench, Triibner & Co., Ltd. Per copy, 10 cents (sixpence). Yearly, $1.00 (in the U.P.U., 5s. 6d). Entered as Second-Class Matter March 26, 1897, at the Post Office at Chicago, 111. under Act of March 3, 1879. Copyright by The Open Court Publishing Company, 191 1. Price, 10 $1.00 per Year JUNE, 1911 Cents X^hc ©pen Court A MONTHLY MAGAZINE Htevoteo to tbe Science ot iReliQion, tbe "Religion of Science, ano tbe Extension ot tbe "Religious parliament loea Founded by Edward C. Hegeler. %*M%1&<* %*t»5* *$2l'1j BUDDHA AS A FISHER OF MEN. (See page 357.) Gbe ©pen Court ffimbUsbing Company CHICAGO LONDON: Kegan Paul, Trench, Triibner & Co., Ltd. Per copy, 10 cents (sixpence). Yearly, $1.00 (in the U.P.U., 5s. 6d). Entered as Second-Class Matter March 26, 1897, at the Post Office at Chicago, 111. under Act of March 3, 1879. Copyright by The Open Court Publishing Company, 191 1. — VOL. XXV. (No. 6. JUNE, 1911. NO. 661 CONTENTS: PAGE Frontispiece. Buddha the Fisherman. The Cabala and Its Influence on Judaism and Christianity. Bernhard Pick. 321 The Fish in Brahmanism and Buddhism (Illustrated). Editor 343 Immediacy. Frederic Drew Bond 358 Evolution of the Divine.
    [Show full text]