Summary Reports Are Issued to Members for Consideration and Are Also Posted on the Council’S Intranet

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Summary Reports Are Issued to Members for Consideration and Are Also Posted on the Council’S Intranet Committee: AUDIT COMMITTEE Date: WEDNESDAY, 22 APRIL 2009 Venue: MORECAMBE TOWN HALL Time: 6.00 P.M. A G E N D A 1. Apologies for Absence 2. Minutes Minutes of the Meeting held on 21st January, 2009 (previously circulated). 3. Items of Urgent Business authorised by the Chairman 4. Declarations of Interest 5. Investments in Icelandic Institutions - Update (Pages 1 - 130) Report of the Head of Financial Services 6. Risk Management (Pages 131 - 173) Report of the Head of Financial Services 7. Internal Audit Monitoring (Pages 174 - 178) Report of the Internal Audit Manager. 8. Results of Internal Audit Work (Pages 179 - 186) Report of the Internal Audit Manager. ADMINISTRATIVE ARRANGEMENTS (i) Membership Councillors Malcolm Thomas (Chairman), Jon Barry, Abbott Bryning, Roger Dennison, Janice Hanson, Geoff Knight and Keith Sowden (ii) Substitute Membership Councillors Shirley Burns, Tina Clifford, Tony Johnson, Karen Leytham, Geoff Marsland, Ian McCulloch, Sylvia Rogerson, Peter Robinson and Paul Woodruff (iii) Queries regarding this Agenda Please contact Sharon Marsh, Democratic Services - telephone (01524) 582096 or email [email protected]. (iv) Changes to Membership, substitutions or apologies Please contact Members’ Secretary, telephone 582170, or alternatively email [email protected]. MARK CULLINAN, CHIEF EXECUTIVE, TOWN HALL, DALTON SQUARE, LANCASTER LA1 1PJ Published on 9th April 2009 Page 1 Agenda Item 5 AUDIT COMMITTEE Investments in Icelandic Institutions - Update 22 April 2009 Report of Head of Financial Services PURPOSE OF REPORT This report provides the Committee with an update on actions taken since it last considered this matter back in November, and includes the Audit Commission’s and the Treasury Select Committee’s recently issued reports for Members’ consideration. This report is public. RECOMMENDATIONS (1) That the report be noted. (2) That the Committee indicates whether there are any further specific aspects of the attached reports they wish to be considered, as part of any subsequent review of the internal control and governance arrangements for the Council’s treasury management function. 1 Report 1.1 At the special Audit Committee meeting held last November, in considering details of the Council’s Icelandic investments Members resolved that a report be requested regarding any future changes in investment policy and also that updates be provided to each meeting of Full Council. 1.2 With regard to the latter point, updates have been included in each of Cabinet’s budget reports to Council. These have included recent briefings provided by the Local Government Association (LGA); the latest of which is included at Appendix A for information. Initially these briefings were provided weekly but given the timing of new information becoming available, these are now produced monthly. 1.3 As yet, there is no further information available on which to make an informed view regarding exactly how much of the total amounts owing (£6M plus £260K accrued interest to October 2008) will be returned. Now that the budget exercise for 2009/10 is completed, as reported to Council it is intended that formal updates will be included through the usual reporting routes (i.e. in particular through quarterly PRT meetings). Monthly updates from the LGA to Group leaders will continue. 1.4 With regard to reporting on future changes in investment policy, the Council’s treasury management framework has been updated significantly for 2009/10 and Page 2 prior to it being finally approved by Council on 04 March, it was also considered by both Cabinet and Budget and Performance Panel. 1.5 Since then, the Audit Commission has released its report on Icelandic investments (English authorities) and the Treasury Select Committee has also very recently released a report “Banking Crisis: The impact of the failure of the Icelandic banks”. This is one of a series of reports that the Committee is publishing as part of its broader inquiry into the banking crisis. 1.6 Copies of both the Audit Commission’s and the Select Committee’s reports are attached for Members’ information. It is clear that further information, advice and guidance will follow in due course, from the Audit Commission and from other bodies such as the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA). In view of this, and the actions already taken in updating the current year’s treasury management framework, at this stage it is recommended only that Members indicate whether there are any further specific aspects of the reports they wish to be considered, in reviewing the internal control and governance arrangements surrounding the function. 1.7 Once the Audit Commission and CIPFA have completed their deliberations, a further review of the Treasury Management Framework will be completed for Members’ consideration. This will pick up on any points raised at this meeting, as well as any other external reports etc. that may be issued by other bodies in the meantime. It should be noted that at present, general responsibility for scrutinising the treasury management framework proposals rests with Budget and Performance Panel, rather than the Audit Committee. Given the Audit Commission’s recommendations, it is envisaged that this aspect will be considered further in due course. 2 Options and Options Analysis (including risk assessment) This report is primarily for information and no options are put forward. CONCLUSION OF IMPACT ASSESSMENT (including Diversity, Human Rights, Community Safety, Sustainability and Rural Proofing) No implications directly arising or quantifiable at this time. FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS In terms of the legal advice obtained through the LGA, to date the City Council’s share of costs amounts to £1,501.91. This will be funded from the existing Contractor / Consultancy budget in Financial Services. DEPUTY SECTION 151 OFFICER’S COMMENTS This report has been prepared by the s151 Officer. LEGAL IMPLICATIONS Legal Services have been consulted and have no further comments. MONITORING OFFICER’S COMMENTS The Monitoring Officer has been consulted and has no further comments. BACKGROUND PAPERS Contact Officer: Nadine Muschamp Treasury Management Framework 2009/10 Telephone: 01524 582117 E-mail: [email protected] Ref: Page 3 promoting better local government From the Chairman and Chief Executive of the Association Councillor Margaret Eaton John Ransford To Group Leaders and Chief Executives All councils with exposure to Icelandic banks 20 March 2009 Dear Colleague ‘File on Four’ report Many of you will have heard or read about the recent ‘File on Four’ report on council finances and investments in Icelandic banks, which included suggestions about councils’ likely recovery from the banks. The information quoted was provided by an individual not involved in the administration processes for any of the banks and does not accord with information that is publicly available about potential recovery. We would advise councils to discount the forecast made on the programme; this update provides further information about progress and potential recovery from each of the banks councils invested in. Individual bank update The next creditor meetings for Landsbanki and Glitnir will take place during week beginning 30 March. As outlined in our previous update, the key issue in relation to both banks is the issue of preferential status for depositors, including local authorities. There are positive signs that depositors will be treated as having preferential creditor status under Icelandic legislation (as is the case in other jurisdictions such as the US). If this is the case, councils are likely to recover a very significant part of their deposits through this route (or even all of it, in the case of Glitnir). However, the position is not yet confirmed and it is likely to be several months before it is resolved. The expectation is that the issue will need to be tested in the courts, and draft legislation is before the Icelandic parliament which should enable this to happen once it is passed. Through our lawyers Bevan Brittan we are continuing to monitor this issue and, under the direction of the relevant local government creditor committees, will take appropriate action as necessary. The administration process for Heritable is ongoing. As stated in previous updates, the administrator has advised that he expects to make a material payment to E-mail [email protected] Local Government House, Smith Square, London SW1P 3HZ DX 119450 Clerkenwell 3 Chief Executive: John Ransford Tel 020 7664 3000 Fax 020 7664 3030 Information Helpline 020 7664 3131 http://www.lga.gov.uk Page 4 2 creditors. Further information about the administration will be made available to creditors in the statutory report required in April. There remains significantly less clarity about possible recovery from Kaupthing, Singer and Friedlander, although the administrator has advised that he expects a dividend will be payable. A meeting of the statutory creditor committee was held on 16 March. The committee were updated on payments and activity by different parts of the business, as well as on a Bank of England trust account holding some £150m of deposits made with KS&F between 2 -7 October 2008. A fuller update will be provided to creditors in the statutory report due by 21 April. Audit Commission and other reports We are anticipating that the Audit Commission will be publishing its report into local authority treasury management and Icelandic banks on 26 March. We will share further information with council finance officers and media teams as soon as possible. We understand that the CLG Select Committee report into local authority treasury management is unlikely to be published until after Easter. Dialogue with government We have had further dialogue with Treasury officials and their advisers at meetings in London and Reykjavik, and they have continued to provide useful information about processes taking place in Iceland and their dialogue with the Icelandic government / IMF. A further meeting has been scheduled for the end of April.
Recommended publications
  • VOLUNTARY CONTRIBUTIONS 2014 Facts and Figures
    ALBANIA ALBANIE ANDORRA ANDORRE ARMENIA ARMÉNIE AUSTRIA AUTRICHE AZERBAIJAN AZERBAÏDJAN BELGIUM BELGIQUE BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA BOSNIE-HERZÉGOVINE BULGARIA BULGARIE CROATIA CROATIE CYPRUS CHYPRE CZECH REPUBLIC RÉPUBLIQUE TCHÈQUE DENMARK DANEMARK ESTONIA ESTONIE FINLAND FINLANDE FRANCE FRANCE GEORGIA GÉORGIE GERMANY ALLEMAGNE GREECE GRÈCE HUNGARY HONGRIE ICELAND ISLANDE IRELAND IRLANDE ITALY ITALIE LATVIA LETTONIE LIECHTENSTEIN LIECHTENSTEIN LITHUANIA LITUANIE LUXEMBOURG LUXEMBOURG MALTA MALTE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA MONACO MONACO MONTENEGRO MONTÉNÉGRO NETHERLANDS PAYS-BAS NORWAY NORVÈGE POLAND POLOGNE PORTUGAL PORTUGAL ROMANIA ROUMANIE RUSSIAN FEDERATION FÉDÉRATION DE RUSSIE SAN MARINO SAINT-MARIN SERBIA SERBIE SLOVAK REPUBLIC RÉPUBLIQUE SLOVAQUE SLOVENIA SLOVÉNIE SPAIN ESPAGNE SWEDEN SUÈDE SWITZERLAND SUISSE «THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA» «L’EX-RÉPUBLIQUE YOUGOSLAVE DE MACÉDOINE» TURKEY TURQUIE UKRAINE UKRAINE UNITED KINGDOM ROYAUME-UNI ALBANIA ALBANIE ANDORRA ANDORRE ARMENIA ARMÉNIE AUSTRIA AUTRICHE AZERBAIJAN AZERBAÏDJAN BELGIUM BELGIQUE BOSNIA AND HERZEGOVINA BOSNIE-HERZÉGOVINE BULGARIA BULGARIE CROATIA CROATIE CYPRUS CHYPRE CZECH REPUBLIC RÉPUBLIQUE TCHÈQUE DENMARK DANEMARK ESTONIA ESTONIE FINLAND FINLANDE FRANCE FRANCE GEORGIA GÉORGIE GERMANY ALLEMAGNE GREECE GRÈCE HUNGARY HONGRIE ICELAND ISLANDE IRELAND IRLANDE ITALY ITALIE LATVIA LETTONIE LIECHTENSTEIN LIECHTENSTEIN LITHUANIA LITUANIE LUXEMBOURG LUXEMBOURG MALTA MALTE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA RÉPUBLIQUE DE MOLDOVA MONACO MONACO MONTENEGRO MONTÉNÉGRO NETHERLANDS
    [Show full text]
  • Speakers Conference Report.Qxd
    Second Report The Lord Alderdice, The Speaker Report of a Conference for Speakers, Presiding Officers and Clerks of the United Kingdom, Ireland, the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands Held on Thursday 27 and Friday 28 June 2002 in Parliament Buildings, Belfast Report of a Conference for Speakers, Presiding Officers and Clerks of the United Kingdom, Ireland, the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands Held on Thursday 27 and Friday 28 June 2002 in Parliament Buildings, Belfast Executive Summary The Speaker of the Northern Ireland Assembly, the Lord Alderdice, invited Speakers, Presiding Officers and Clerks from the United Kingdom, Ireland, the Isle of Man and the Channel Islands to a conference in Parliament Buildings, Belfast. The aim of the conference was to exchange information on matters of mutual interest, to provide a momentum for the development of inter- parliamentary co-operation and to build on the networks already flourishing at Presiding Officer and official level. The Clerks of the various Parliaments and Assemblies met on Thursday 27 June, prior to the Speakers’/Presiding Officers’ Conference on 28 June. The agenda for the conference was drawn up following consultation with participants. Preparing for elections was identified as one of the key themes and was discussed by both the Clerks’ Forum on 27 June and the meeting of Speakers and Presiding Officers on 28 June. A list of participants is attached at Appendix A. The agendas for both the Clerks’ Forum and the Speakers’/Presiding Officers’ Conference is attached at Appendix B. The records of discussion provide a detailed report on each of the conference sessions.
    [Show full text]
  • Modernizing Government in the Channel Islands: New Political Executives in British Crovvn Dependencies
    Modernizing Government in the Channel Islands: New Political Executives in British Crovvn Dependencies Philip Morris* Abstract This article examines recent reforms of internal government arrangements in the Channel Islands jurisdictions of Jersey and Guernsey. These reforms represent the most far-reaching changes in insular government for over half a century in response to concerns over slow and poor-quality decision-making, conflicts of interest, absence of effective accountability mechanisms and external critique of aspects of the Islands' offshore finance sectors, upon which their economies are heavily dependent. The article is structured into three sections. Section I outlines the constitutional position of both jurisdictions, the pressures for reform and the political economy of British offshore finance centres. Section II critically evaluates key features of the new systems and their performances to date. The final part, Section III, highlights key themes including the necessity for external pressure as a trigger for reform, selective/diluted implementation of reform packages and the problem of genuine accountability in small jurisdictions. Keywords: Jersey, Guernsey, governments, reform, offshore, accountability I. Background: Constitutional Context and the Political Economy of British Isles Offshore Finance Centres The Channel Islands of Jersey and Guernsey are distinct jurisdictions which enjoy a constitutional status that can only be characterized as 'unique'.' They are neither part of the United Kingdom nor colonies: * Independent public law researcher; e-mail: [email protected]. The background work for this article was prepared while the author was Senior Lecturer in Law at the University of Stirling. The author expresses his gratitude to those officials of the States Public Libraries in St Helier, Jersey and St Peter Port, Guernsey for their assistance during field trips to the Islands.
    [Show full text]
  • The World's Modern Autonomy Systems
    2 The concepT of poliTical auTonomy Thomas Benedikter The World‘s Modern Autonomy Systems Concepts and Experiences of Regional Territorial Autonomy 1 The World’s Modern Autonomy Systems Institute of Minority Rights Concepts and Experiences of Regional Territorial EURAC Research Autonomy Viale Druso/Drususallee 1 I – 39100 Bolzano/Bozen Bozen/Bolzano, 2009 Email: [email protected] This study was written for the European Academy of A second version of this work is available in German Bolzano/Bozen (EURAC; www.eurac.edu), Institute for language: Minority Rights, in the frame of the project Europe- Thomas Benedikter South Asia Exchange on Supranational (Regional) Autonomien der Welt – Eine Einführung in die Policies and Instruments for the Promotion of Human Regionalautonomien der Welt mit vergleichender Rights and the Management of Minority Issues Analyse, ATHESIA, Bozen 2007 (EURASIA-Net) (FP7). ISBN 978-88-8266-479-4 www.athesiabuch.it The first edition of this publication has been released [email protected] in India in 2007 under the title „The World‘s Working Regional Autonomies“ by ANTHEM PRESS, www. This work is dedicated to my father, Alfons Benedikter anthempress.com (born in 1918), who for most of his life gave his all for C-49 Kalkaji, New Delhi 110019, India autonomy and self-determination in South Tyrol. 75-76 Blackfriars Road, London SE1 8HA, UK or PO Box 9779, London SW19 7ZG, UK 244 Madison Ave. #116, New York, NY 10016, USA Edited by Copyright © EURAC 2009 This edition is published in collaboration with the Mahanirban Calcutta Research Group GC 45, Sector 3, Salt Lake, Kolkata-700106, India.
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Financial Regulation in the Crown Dependencies
    Review of Financial Regulation in the Crown Dependencies Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for the Home Department by Command of Her Majesty November 1998 Cm 4109-i Part 1 - Main Report £17.85 Cm 4109-ii Part 2 - The Jersey Finance Centre £10.30 Cm 4109-iii Part 3 - The Guernsey Finance Centre £12.60 Cm 4109-iv Part 4 - The Isle of Man Finance Centre £11.40 published by The Stationery Office as Part 1 ISBN 0 10 141092 1 Part 2 ISBN 0 10 141093 X Part 3 ISBN 0 10 141094 8 Part 4 ISBN 0 10 141095 6 Review of Financial Regulation in the Crown Dependencies OFFICE OF THE REVIEW OF FINANCIAL REGULATION IN THE CROWN DEPENDENCIES c/o Home Office 50 Queen Anne's Gate London SW1H 9AT Rt Hon Jack Straw MP Home Secretary Home Office 50 Queen Anne's Gate London SW1H 9AT 24 October 1998 Dear Home Secretary REPORT OF THE REVIEW OF FINANCIAL REGULATION IN THE CROWN DEPENDENCIES You commissioned me on 20 January 1998 to review with the Island authorities in Jersey, Guernsey and the Isle of Man their laws, systems and practices for regulation of their international finance centres, the combating of financial crime and co- operation with other jurisdictions. I have pleasure in submitting my Report with this letter. As explained in Chapter 1, the Report consists of four Parts. Part I presents my own assessment. I take responsibility for what it says. It includes a two-page summary of Principal Issues followed by a full Summary and Main Conclusions and then the Main Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Hollingsworth V. Virginia Was Rightly Decided, and Why INS V
    Volume 83, Number 5, April 2005 A Textualist Defense of Article I, Section 7, Clause 3: Why Hollingsworth v. Virginia Was Rightly Decided, and Why INS v. Chadha Was Wrongly Reasoned Seth Barrett Tillman* Every Order, Resolution, or Vote to which the Concurrence of the Senate and House of Representatives may be necessary (except on a question of Adjournment) shall be presented to the President of the United States; and before the Same shall take Effect, shall be approved by him, or being disapproved by him, shall be repassed by two thirds of the Senate and House of Representatives, according to the Rules and Limitations prescribed in the Case of a Bill. —U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 7, Clause 3 The sweeping nature of this obviously ill-considered provision . —Professor Stanley Corwin’s annotated Constitution (1964) The Court, on the day succeeding the [oral] argument, delivered an unanimous opinion, that the [Eleventh] amendment being constitutionally adopted, there could not be exercised any jurisdiction, in any case, past or future, in which a state was sued by the citizens of another state, or by citizens, or subjects, of any foreign state. —Hollingsworth v. Virginia (1798) All this, of course, leaves us entirely in the dark as to how or why the Court thought it had evaded the clear language of Article I, Section 7, Clause 3. * Harvard Law School, J.D., cum laude (2000); University of Chicago, A.B., honors (1984). This Article was written while clerking for the Honorable Mark E. Fuller (M.D. Ala.) and the Honorable William J.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutional Reform: Information Sources and Reading
    CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM: INFORMATION SOURCES AND READING Contents Constitutional Models .................................................................................. 3 Bailiwick of Guernsey ............................................................................... 3 Bailiwick of Jersey .................................................................................... 3 Isle of Man ................................................................................................ 4 Faroe Islands ............................................................................................ 5 Falkland Islands ........................................................................................ 5 English City Deals ........................................................................................ 5 Scottish Cities Alliance ................................................................................. 6 European Union ........................................................................................... 7 Representation within Europe ................................................................... 7 Examples of Self Governing Regions in the EU ........................................ 7 EU Budget Management .......................................................................... 8 European Court of Justice ........................................................................ 8 EU Single Market – including Directive on Consumer Rights, Universal Postal Service and The Postcode Penalty ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth Parliamentary Association
    COMMONWEALTH PARLIAMENTARY ASSOCIATION REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE UNITED KINGDOM BRANCH 2008/09 COMMONWEALTH PARLIAMENTARY ASSOCIATION REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE UNITED KINGDOM BRANCH 2008/09 COMMONWEALTH PARLIAMENTARY ASSOCIATION UNITED KINGDOM BRANCH Presidents RT HON. BARONESS HAYMAN (Lord Speaker) RT HON. MICHAEL MARTIN MP (Speaker of the House of Commons) Vice-Presidents RT HON. BARONESS BOOTHROYD OF SANDWELL RT HON. GORDON BROWN MP (Prime Minister) RT HON. LORD CARRINGTON KG GCMG CH MC DL RT HON. LORD FALCONER OF THOROTON QC RT HON. LORD HOWE OF ABERAVON CH QC RT HON. LORD HURD OF WESTWELL CH CBE RT HON. DAVID CAMERON MP RT HON. LORD IRVINE OF LAIRG QC RT HON. LORD MACKAY OF CLASHFERN KT RT HON. LORD OWEN CH RT HON. JACK STRAW MP RT HON. BARONESS THATCHER LG OM FRS Chairman of the UK Branch RT HON. GORDON BROWN MP (Prime Minister) Executive Committee Chair Mr JOHN AUSTIN MP Joint Vice-Chairs RT HON. LORD ANDERSON OF SWANSEA DL (until 21 July 2008) MR DAVID CLELLAND MP (until 21 July 2008) SIR NICHOLAS WINTERTON DL MP (until 21 July 2008) RT HON. JOHN MCFALL MP (from 21 July 2008) MS ANN MCINTOSH MP (from 21 July 2008) BARONESS NORTHOVER (from 21 July 2008) Honorary Treasurer RT HON. SIR JOHN STANLEY MP Members MR JOHN AUSTIN MP (Chair) RT HON. SIR JOHN STANLEY MP (Hon. Treasurer) RT HON. LORD ANDERSON OF SWANSEA DL RT HON. KEVIN BARRON MP MR HUGH BAYLEY MP DR ROBERTA BLACKMAN-WOODS MP RT HON. GORDON BROWN MP (ex-officio) MR PETER BOTTOMLEY MP RT HON.
    [Show full text]
  • A Century of Irish Parliamentary Government
    03 Finnegan McCarthy article.qxp_Admin 66-4 17/12/2018 11:39 Page 49 Administration, vol. 66, no. 4 (2018), pp. 49–59 doi: 10.2478/admin-2018-0032 A century of Irish parliamentary government Peter Finnegan Houses of the Oireachtas Muiris MacCarthaigh Queen’s University Belfast1 Introduction The centenary of the sitting of the first Dáil in January 1919 provides an opportune time to reflect on the evolution of the Irish parliamentary experience over that period, and the role played by the national parliament as the locus of Irish democratic politics. And though the Irish experience of parliamentary politics is not without its shortcomings, there are not many contemporary states within Europe or indeed globally that can attest to ten decades of unbroken parliamentary government from the early twentieth century to the present. In this forum piece we survey the principal changes to the structure, operation and character of the Oireachtas and Irish parliamentary politics since the First Dáil met in the turbulent post- WWI period. In a final section we look to the future of Irish parliament. 1 We are grateful to John Coakley for his comments on an earlier draft of this paper. 49 03 Finnegan McCarthy article.qxp_Admin 66-4 17/12/2018 11:39 Page 50 50 PETER FINNEGAN AND MUIRIS MACCARTHAIGH The emergence and design of the Oireachtas The sitting of the First Dáil in 1919 was a vital element of a wider nationalist effort to introduce an alternative system of government to the incumbent British one which had operated with increasing ineffectiveness from Dublin Castle and London.
    [Show full text]
  • Banking Crisis: the Impact of the Failure of the Icelandic Banks
    House of Commons Treasury Committee Banking Crisis: The impact of the failure of the Icelandic banks Fifth Report of Session 2008–09 Report, together with formal minutes Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 31 March 2009 HC 402 Published on 4 April 2009 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £0.00 The Treasury Committee The Treasury Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration, and policy of HM Treasury, HM Revenue & Customs and associated public bodies. Current membership Rt Hon John McFall MP (Labour, West Dunbartonshire) (Chairman) Nick Ainger MP (Labour, Carmarthen West & South Pembrokeshire) Mr Graham Brady MP (Conservative, Altrincham and Sale West) Mr Colin Breed MP (Liberal Democrat, South East Cornwall) Jim Cousins MP (Labour, Newcastle upon Tyne Central) Mr Michael Fallon MP (Conservative, Sevenoaks) (Chairman, Sub-Committee) Ms Sally Keeble MP (Labour, Northampton North) Mr Andrew Love MP (Labour, Edmonton) John Mann MP, (Labour, Bassetlaw) Mr George Mudie MP (Labour, Leeds East) John Thurso MP (Liberal Democrat, Caithness, Sutherland and Easter Ross) Mr Mark Todd MP (Labour, South Derbyshire) Mr Andrew Tyrie MP (Conservative, Chichester) Sir Peter Viggers MP (Conservative, Gosport) The following members were also members of the committee during the inquiry: Mr Philip Dunne MP (Conservative, Ludlow), Mr Stephen Crabb MP (Conservative, Preseli Pembrokeshire), Mr Siôn Simon MP, (Labour, Birmingham, Erdington) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No. 152. These are available on the Internet via www.parliament.uk.
    [Show full text]
  • Designing a Public Services Ombudsman for Jersey
    JERSEY LAW COMMISSION TOPIC REPORT DESIGNING A PUBLIC SERVICES OMBUDSMAN FOR JERSEY Topic Report No.1/2018/TR November 2018 2 The Jersey Law Commission is an independent body appointed by the States Assembly to identiFy and examine aspects oF Jersey law with a view to their development and reForm. This includes in particular: the elimination oF anomalies; the repeal oF obsolete and unnecessary enactments; the reductions oF the number oF separate enactments; and generally, the simpliFication and modernisation oF the law. Members oF the Law Commission serve on a part-time basis and are unremunerated. The current Law Commissioners are: Mr Clive Chaplin (chairman) Advocate Barbara Corbett ProFessor Claire de Than Mr Malcolm Le Boutillier ProFessor Andrew Le Sueur (the Topic Commissioner anD author of this report. His term of office enDeD 7 October 2018) Mr Jonathan Walker Published by the Jersey Law Commission in November 2018. This publication is available to download Free oF charge on the Jersey Law Commission website. Jersey Law Commission Address For correspondence: Jersey Law Commission Care oF: Corbett Le Quesne 1a West’s Centre St Helier Jersey JE2 4ST www.jerseylawcommission.org [email protected] Jersey Law Commission: Designing a Public Services Ombudsman For Jersey 3 SUMMARY What coulD anD shoulD a public services OmbuDsman scheme For Jersey look like? Those are the overarching questions addressed in this report oF the Jersey Law Commission. To help policy makers (oFFicials and Ministers), we identiFy options (the ‘could’ question). To do this, we examine international benchmarks For good design oF ombudsman organisations, other design principles, the design and operation oF 13 Ombudsman schemes in small jurisdictions, developments in Ombudsman organisations across the United Kingdom, knowledge oF Jersey (gained From a series oF research interviews and the lived experience oF the Law Commissioners) and academic research.
    [Show full text]
  • Composition and Election of the States Assembly
    STATES OF JERSEY COMPOSITION AND ELECTION OF THE STATES ASSEMBLY Lodged au Greffe on 12th December 2016 by Deputy A.D. Lewis of St. Helier STATES GREFFE 2016 P.133 PROPOSITION THE STATES are asked to decide whether they are of opinion (a) to agree that it should establish an Assembly of 44 Members comprising 12 Parish Connétables elected from within the current Parish boundaries and 32 other Members (to be known by the title of Senator), elected from 6 large districts, each choosing 5 Senators, with the exception of St. Helier Districts 1 and 2, which would each choose 6 Senators in addition to their Parish Connétable; (b) that the proposed 6 new large districts will replace the current Schedule 1 to the States of Jersey Law 2005, as follows – Number of Senators Constituencies to be returned District 1: St. Helier North Vingtaine du Mont Cochon, Vingtaine du Mont à l’Abbé, Vingtaine du Haut du Mont au Prêtre, and Vingtaine du Rouge Bouillon, in the Parish of St. Helier. 6 District 2: St. Helier South Cantons de Bas et de Haut de la Vingtaine de la Ville, and Vingtaine de Bas du Mont au Prêtre, in the Parish of St. Helier. 6 District 3: East District Parish of Grouville, Parish of St. Clement, and Parish of St. Martin. 5 District 4: North District Parish of St. Saviour, and Parish of Trinity. 5 District 5: West District Parish of St. John, Parish of St. Lawrence, Parish of St. Mary, and Parish of St. Ouen. 5 District 6: South District Parish of St.
    [Show full text]